The Town of Parker, Colorado

Similar documents
Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Architectural Narrative Columbia & Hawthorn responds to its unique location as a gateway to Little Italy and the Bay in several ways. 1. The visual ch

Chapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS

Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting #7 West Anaheim Youth Center May 26, 2016

VERTICAL MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT (Urban Village)

MEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

3.1 Existing Built Form

900 BURRARD STREET CD-1 GUIDELINES (BY-LAW NO. 6421) (CD-1 NO. 229) CONTENTS. 1 Application and Intent... 1

AGENDA SLOT HOME EVALUATION & TEXT AMENDMENT. 5:30 - Welcome

Chapter URBAN VILLAGE ZONING DISTRICTS

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

TOWNHOUSE. TYPICAL UNIT SIZE 1,200 to 1,600 square foot average unit (two to three stories) DENSITY dwelling units/acre without cottages

1615 EDGEWATER DRIVE, SUITE 180 ORLANDO, FL T: /F: Memorandum

Article 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

739 Channing Way PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

Missing Middle Housing in Practice

VIEW FROM CAMBIE STREET

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

5.1 Site Planning & Building Form

Plan Dutch Village Road

ARTICLE 5. COMMERCIAL AND OFFICE DISTRICTS 5.1 PURPOSE STATEMENTS 5.2 USES 5.3 DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS 5.4 DESIGN STANDARDS 5.5 DK DISTRICT STANDARDS 5

Article 2. Rules of Interpretation

BOROUGH OF HOPATCONG ORDINANCE No

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

DAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9

Crenshaw/LAX Transit Project Joint Development Fairview Heights Community Workshop #2 April 30, 2016

Article 7. URBAN CENTER (C-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

The demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.

Better Housing by Design - Proposed Draft Summary

Self-Guided Walking Tours Ground-oriented Housing Types. Cedar Cottage Tour Cambie Corridor Phase 3

38 th & Blake Height Amendments: Public Meeting #5 Building Design Comments July 13 th, 2016

Urban Design Brief (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London

DESIGN CRITERIA Ridegedale Center-Outparcel Restaurant, Minnetonka, MN

Central Business District Core Ordinance

SELLWOOD MORELAND IMPROVEMENT LEAGUE 8210 SE 13th AVENUE, PORTLAND, OR STATION CHURCH

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

DIVISION 1.3 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP

Jefferson County. Case RZ. Presenter: Alan Tiefenbach. Planning and Zoning Division

MONROE WARD REZONING SUMMARY. October 2018

COMMISSION ACTION FORM SUBJECT: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT FOR LINCOLN WAY CORRIDOR PLAN DOWNTOWN GATEWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS

Town Center Joint Commission Public Hearing #1: January 20, 2016

Wilson Bridge Corridor Zoning. Department of Planning & Building

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR

ARTICLE 909. PD 909. PD 909 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on April 23, (Ord.

SHAPING NEW BUILDINGS

KENECT DENVER 2136 LAWRENCE OPTIONAL CONCEPT REVIEW ARAPAHOE SQUARE DESIGN ADVISORY BOARD FEBRUARY 20, 2018

UrbanFootprint Place Types. Urban Mixed Use. Urban Residential. Urban Commercial. Residential 1% SF Large Lot 0%

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

CHAPTER 5 R ESIDENTIAL

Self-Guided Walking Tours Ground-oriented Housing Types. Mt. Pleasant Tour Cambie Corridor Phase 3

SECTION 10: COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES

SALT LAKE CITY ORDINANCE No. of 2016

2. The modification is consistent with the objectives of this chapter.

Appearance Review Board Staff Report

PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING

4.2.8 Westwood/VA Hospital Station Area

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Land Use and Zoning Changes for Land Development Code Update

To Download the Guidelines Document:

Rezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017

From Policy to Reality

MARKET & OCTAVIA AREA PLAN FUNDAMENTAL DESIGN PRINCIPLES

566 Hilson Ave & 148 Clare St., Ottawa Planning Rationale June 20 th, 2014 Prepared by Rosaline J. Hill, B.E.S., B.Arch., O.A.A.

STANDARDS FOR OUTDOOR DINING AREAS ON 8 th STREET

Introduction. General Development Standards

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT MCDONALD S ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT VARIANCES

CAN TRADITIONAL ZONING ACHIEVE OUR GOALS FOR DOWNTOWN ANN ARBOR?

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

Infill & Other Residential Design Review

BUILDING HEIGHTS. The following diagram depicts the maximum allowable building height in a +3 zone.

NORTHWEST QUADRANT NEIGHBORHOOD STUDY

ARTICLE 9 GENOA TOWN CENTER OVERLAY DISTRICT

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

Virginia Beach, Virginia. oceanfront resort dist r ic t FORM-BASED CODE APPENDIX 1 TO CITY ZONING ORDINANCE

City Avenue District Rezoning. Regional Center Area & Bala Cynwyd Retail District December 14, 2011 Public Hearing

Code Update Process For: Downtown Neighborhood Conservation Buffer (NCB)

Appendix C Built Form Guidelines

DOWNTOWN DANVERS C1-C1A DISTRICTS NEW ZONING BYLAW & DESIGN STANDARDS Town of Danvers, MA

Draft Town Center Development and Design Guidelines w/placeholder graphics 11/21/15 Joint Commission Meeting

A APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES

Section 1. Appendix A, "Zoning" of the Code of the City of Charlotte is hereby amended as follows:

THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH ROYALTON, OHIO

DRAFT STANDARDS PUBLIC DRAFT

T O W N O F B L A C K S B U R G RESIDENTIAL INFILL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

SITE & BUILDING DESIGN STANDARDS

Planning Commission June 25, Lincoln Boulevard

SECTION 10: COMMERCIAL ZONES

Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses

ncd zoning overlay regulations

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Chapters and Sections

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PUD/DCI BAINBRIDGE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

1935 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

Denver Zoning Code Text Amendment #3 Slot Home Text Amendment PLANNING BOARD REVIEW REDLINE DRAFT 3/13/18

2.35 BVT G Bow Valley Trail General Commercial District [ ]

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PREMIER AUTO SERVICES, INC. VARIANCES

Transcription:

August 14th, 2017 Development Design Standards commercial, industrial, and mixed-use The Town of Parker, Colorado 2017 URBAN DESIGN ASSOCIATES

Where we are in the process: Tasks 1 & 2: Listening and Understanding Trip 1: Understanding and Analysis Community Open ouse (May 3rd) Task 3: Testing Ideas Trip 2: Multi-amily Design Workshop Trip 2: Multi-amily Design Workshop Draft Multi-amily Design Standards Chapter Trip 3: Commercial, Industrial, and Mixed-Use Design Workshop Community Workshop (August 14th) Draft C,I,MU Design Standards Chapter Task 4: Implementation DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS / TOWN O PARKER, COLORADO

DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS / TOWN O PARKER, COLORADO

Community open house #1 (Commercial, industrial, mixed-use) EXISTING: Likes Awnings Brick/stone materials Dislikes Lack of landscape planting, especially in the parking lot Landscape blocking tenant visability Difficult/unsafe accessibility Commercial scale lighting Large scale entrances (should be more for pedestrians) PRECEDENTS: There is a desire for a mix of high-quality materials and design People liked well-designed building elements and interesting facades Desire for more pedestrian space near building entries Generic massing, lack of openings and articulation, and lack of building elements COMMERCIAL PRECEDENTS 2287 PARKER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS / PARKER, COLORADO / 15 MAY 2017 / town of parker Likes Inviting feel Eclectic character with variation in materials (brick, wood, stone), patterns and colors Well-defined pedestrian space in front of entrance Large building broken down to look like smaller, individual buildings Dislikes Contemporary character Generic massing and materials (looks boring) Urban form Character that doesn t fit Parker EXISTING: Likes Window articulation/breaking windows down into smaller panes Dislikes Appearance ugly and plain No landscaping PRECEDENTS: Likes Building elements like awnings Dislikes Character does not fit into Parker INDUSTRIAL PRECEDENTS 2287 PARKER DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS / PARKER, COLORADO / 15 MAY 2017 / town of parker DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS / TOWN O PARKER, COLORADO

Open house #2 (Commercial, industrial, and mixed-use) Study bringing buildings to the corners to create gateways Liked diversity in building designs, variety in materials, warm tones, natural materials Develop sites to preserve mountain views Develop sustainably & green (conserve water & energy) DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS / TOWN O PARKER, COLORADO

OUTPARCELS BIG/MID-BOX RETAIL Chapter 5. Building Type Standards Sec. 5.3 Permitted Building Types Chapter 5. Building Type Standards Sec. 5.3 Permitted Building Types D E D E G G A C B A C B igure 3.54 Precedent of an Outparcel Building igure 3.61 Precedent of a Big Box Building igure 3.53 Example of an Outparcel Building Type Lot igure 3.60 Example of Big Box Building Type Lot Table 3.11 Outparcel Building Type Lot Requirements Lot Size Minimum Maximum A Lot Width (eet) 120 800 Table 3.13 Box Retail Building Type Lot Requirements Lot Size Minimum Maximum A Lot Width (eet) 200 800 B Lot Depth (eet) 150 1,000 Lot Area (Square eet) 18,000 800,000 Lot Area (Acres) 0.4 18.4 Setbacks and Build-To Zone C ront Setback (eet) 0 25 D Side Setback (eet) 0 n/a E Rear Setback (eet) 20 n/a Side-Street Setback (eet on Corner Lots) 0 n/a G Build-To Zone (eet) 0 30 Build-To Zone Occupancy (Streetfacing Mass only, %) 0 ront Parking Setback (eet) n/a Permitted Uses Permitted Ground loor Uses Commercial, Retail, Community igure 3.55 Precedent of an Outparcel Building B Lot Depth (eet) 400 1,000 Lot Area (Square eet) 80,000 800,000 Lot Area (Acres) 1.8 18.4 Setbacks and Build-To Zone C ront Setback (eet) 20 40 D Side Setback (eet) 20 E Rear Setback (eet) 20 40 Side-Street Setback (eet on Corner Lots) 20 40 G Build-To Zone (eet) n/a n/a Build-To Zone Occupancy (Streetfacing Mass only, %) n/a n/a ront Parking Setback (eet) n/a Permitted Uses Permitted Ground loor Uses Commercial, Retail igure 3.62 Precedent of a Big Box Building Permitted Upper loor Uses Commercial, Community Permitted Upper loor Uses Commercial Permitted Development Areas Neighborhood Shopping Center, Outparcels, Mid- Box Shopping Center, Outdoor Outfitter, Club Membership Retailer Permitted Development Areas Neighborhood Shopping Center, Outparcels, Outdoor outfitter, and Club Membership Retailer igure 3.56 Precedent of an Outparcel Building igure 3.63 Precedent of a Big Box Building Jodeco Design Guidelines Jodeco, Atlanta South, Georgia 3 17 Draft April 2016 Jodeco Design Guidelines Jodeco, Atlanta South, Georgia 3 19 Draft April 2016

MIXED-USE RETAIL Chapter 5. Building Type Standards INLINE RETAIL Sec. 5.3 Permitted Building Types Chapter 5. Building Type Standards Sec. 5.3 Permitted Building Types E E D D G C B G A B A C igure 3.48 Precedent of a Retail Building igure 3.42 Precedent of a Mixed-Use Building igure 3.41 Example of Mixed-Use Building Lot igure 3.47 Example of Retail Building Lot Table 3.7 Mixed-Use Building Lot Requirements Table 3.9 Retail Building Lot Requirements Lot Size Minimum Maximum A Lot Width (eet) 0 200 B Lot Depth (eet) 120 200 Lot Size Minimum Maximum A Lot Width (eet) 120 300 B Lot Depth (eet) 0 180 12,000 54,000 0.28 1.24 Lot Area (Square eet) 12,000 40,000 Lot Area (Square eet) Lot Area (Acres).28.92 Lot Area (Acres) Setbacks and Build-To Zone Setbacks and Build-To Zone C ront Setback (eet) 0 15 C ront Setback (eet) 0 60 Side Setback (eet) 15 D Side Setback (eet) 25 D E Rear Setback (eet) n/a E Rear Setback (eet) 5 n/a Side-Street Setback (eet on Corner Lots) 0 60 G Build-To Zone (eet) 30 Build-To Zone Occupancy (%) 50 0 ront Parking Setback (eet) 70 n/a Side-Street Setback (eet on Corner Lots) 0 15 G Build-To Zone (eet) 0 Build-To Zone Occupancy (%) 60 0 ront Parking Setback (eet) 40 igure 3.43 Precedent of a Mixed-Use Building n/a Permitted Uses Permitted Uses Permitted Ground loor Uses Residential, Retail, Community, Commercial Permitted Upper loor Uses Residential, Retail, Community, Commercial Permitted Development Areas Residential Neighborhood and Town Center igure 3.49 Precedent of a Retail Building Permitted Ground loor Uses Retail, Community, Commercial Permitted Upper loor Uses Retail, Community, Commercial Permitted Development Areas Mid-Box Shopping Center and Town Center igure 3.50 Precedent of a Retail Building Jodeco Design Guidelines igure 3.44 Precedent of a Mixed-Use Building Jodeco Design Guidelines Jodeco, Atlanta South, Georgia Jodeco, Atlanta South, Georgia 3 13 Draft April 2016 3 15 Draft April 2016

2017 URBAN DESIGN ASSOCIATES 5 11 13 7 6 14 3 Travois 2 4 8 1 12 9 SITE DESIGN 1 2 3 4 Buildings Oriented to Shape Gathering Space Drive Aisles Designed as Internal Streets Wide Pedestrian-riendly Sidewalks On-Street Parking Pedestrian Walkways through Parking Lots 6 Parking Located in Rear and Side of Buildings 5 BUILDING DESIGN PUBLIC SPACE DESIGN Variation in Roof orms and Eave Lines 8 Tall 1.5 to 2-Story Building Massing 9 igh Transparency Storefronts Buildings Designed as Smaller Buildings along a Street Shade Trees Provide Comfort 12 Site urnishings and Lighting to Create Identity 13 Landscaping Addresses Sustainability Issues 14 Landscape to Transition to Existing Uses 7 APPLYING COMMERCIAL STANDARDS TO CREATE PLACES PARKER DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS / PARKER, COLORADO / JUNE 2017 / Town of Parker 11

2017 URBAN DESIGN ASSOCIATES 6 12 11 7 8 2 4 1 7 9 5 4 13 14 SITE DESIGN 1 2 3 4 5 6 Shared Entry Street for Multiple Parcels Street Trees, Sidewalks, and Landscaping Shared Signage Buildings ront the Primary Road and the Internal Street Sidewalks and Walkways through Parking Lots Buildings Located to Preserve Visibility BUILDING DESIGN Variation in Roof orms 8 Building Elements such as Awnings, Corner Expressions, Terraces, and Canopies that express Colorado Character 9 igh Quality Materials and Material Variation 7 STANDARDS OR AUTO-ORIENTED NEIGBOROOD COMMERCIAL PARKER DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS / PARKER, COLORADO / JUNE 2017 / Town of Parker PUBLIC SPACE DESIGN 11 12 13 14 Landscape Buffers from Larger Roads and Adjacent Uses Landscaping Addresses Sustainability Issues Limited Use of Shade Trees to Provide Comfort Timber ence to Define Project Identity and Edge Multi-Use Path for Pedestrian and Bicycle Access

Dining/gathering plazas between buildings 18 from building to back of sidewalk 8 Multi-use path ~14 Planting strip between sidewalk & Road CASE STUDY SUBURBAN RETROIT, TROY MICIGAN DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS / PARKER, COLORADO / 5 AUGUST 2017 / town of parker Walkways through parking lots and to fronts of retail buildings Parking located behind building Building pulled to corner Planting/Patio Zone -30 from building to back of sidewalk 8 Multi-use path 22 Planting strip between sidewalk & Road 30 from Patio Zone to Road (hardscape and plaza extended to the corner to enhance walkability 2017 URBAN DESIGN ASSOCIATES Parking located behind retail buildings Parking located behind retail buildings, shared with office uses

Tonight s modeling exercise Tables - 4 Different Commercial Sites Table 1: Medium and Big Box Center Table 2: Drive Thru Table 3: Inline Retail Table 4: Vertical Mixed-Use Questions: Where should buildings be located? What type of landscaping feels right? Where should parking be located? DEVELOPMENT DESIGN STANDARDS / TOWN O PARKER, COLORADO

Creating a sense of place through collaboration, context, and community.