COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Similar documents
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR BOARD, ACTING AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES:

RESOLUTION NO. C. No other public utility facilities are in use on the Easement and no facilities would be affected by the vacation.

The 6-foot wide walk connecting Ventura Boulevard to Sunswept Drive, adjacent to Lot 8, Tract No. 5896

ADOPTED BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

AGREEMENT TO NEGOTIATE EXCLUSIVELY WITH FOLLIS- CLIFFORD ALTADENA LLC TO DEVELOP A BUSINESS PARK COMPLEX IN THE WEST ALTADENA PROJECT AREA

CITY OF PALMDALE. REPORT to the Mayor and Members of the City Council from the City Manager

RENTAL INCREASE TO ASSESSOR LEASE FIRESTONE BOULEVARD, NORWALK (FOURTH) (3 VOTES)

3. Adopt the Preliminary Use and Management Plan for the property granted to the District.

MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROBIN DICKERSON, CITY ENGINEER

RESOLUTION NO. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 587 SQ.FT. RD:EEH:LCP

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO LEASE NO REGISTRAR-RECORDER/COUNTY CLERK 1050 SOUTH MAPLE AVENUE, MONTEBELLO (FIRST) (3 VOTES)

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO

;:ft{n Siegel, City Manager

public utility easement (PUE) in orderto facilitate the anticipated developmentof their property. Comments on the

LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA *************************************************************************

Agenda Item No. 6B January 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, City Manager

RESOLUTION NO

Monterey County Page 1

COUNT+ OF SAN MATE0 Inter-Departmental Correspondence

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3:

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD OF DIRECTORS. RESOLUTION No

Recommendation: The Public Works Director-Engineering recommends adoption of the following resolution.

AMENDMENT TO QUITCLAIM DEED AND GRANT OF EASEMENT RECITALS

ORDINANCE NO. 875 (AS AMENDED THROUGH 875

Metro. Board Report. File #: , File Type: Policy Agenda Number: 60.

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

April 15, Return the executed, adopted copy to Frances Lunetta, Suite 648 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration, Extension

ATTACHMENT B GRANT DEED. This deed is in satisfaction of the Eminent Domain Action Case No. GRANT DEED

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

JOEL ROJAS, COMMUNITY DE'WPfiENT DIRECTOR ACCEPTANCE OF A SEWER EASEMENT DEED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EASEMENT AREA TO ALLOW

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Planning Commission Staff Report

1 [Resolution of Intent - San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Public Service Easement Vacation Order - Parkmerced Development Project] 2

CALIFORNIA ERIC GARCETTI MAYOR

TEN-YEAR LEASE CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 3179 TEMPLE AVENUE, POMONA (FIRST DISTRICT) (3 VOTES)

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PUBLIC WORKS AGENCY 399 Elmhurst Street I ayward, CA (510)

RESOLUTION NO

292 West Beamer Street Woodland, CA (530) FAX (530)

ENGINEER S REPORT FOR. OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (Golden Valley Ranch) Fiscal Year CITY OF SANTA CLARITA LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

Brendan Vieg, Principal Planner ( ;

First Amendment to Easement Agreement with North County Transit District for the Cardiff Coastal Rail Trail.

APPROVAL FOR ACCELERATED PROCESSING DIRECT TO CITY COUNCIL

Office of the City Engineer 8/5/2014

RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Revised map for VTT message

AMENDED IN COMMITTEE 7/13/17 RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE THAT:

CITY OF BEVERLY HILLS Department of Public Works and Transportation Civil Engineering Division FINAL MAP SUBMITTAL PROCESS Transmitted

yjryly AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: November 20, 2018 Item Number: To: From:

MIKE FEUER CITY ATTORNEY

AMENDMENT AND EXTENSION OF PARKING EASEMENT

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

AN ORDINANCE OF THE NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN NAPA COUNTY AND NAPA REDEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC

San Carlos Wheeler Plaza Project, Disposal of Former Redevelopment Agency Property and Entry into Related Compensation Agreement

~EV~~LY AGENDA REPORT. Honorable Mayor & City Council Ara Maloyan, City Engineer Samer Elayyan, Civil Engineer ~

SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF DERBY, KANSAS

Order of Business. Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

ADOPT RESOLUTION APPROVING A REPLACEMENT HOUSING PLAN FOR 1855 AND 1875 CLAYTON ROAD

Felicia Newhouse, Public Works Administrative Manager Russ Thompson, Public Works Director SUBJECT: WILDWOOD GLEN LANDSCAPING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT C-91

4/8/2015 Item #10E Page 1

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR THE EXCHANGE OF REAL PROPERTY PIONEER SITE

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

Felicia Newhouse, Public Works Administrative Manager Russ Thompson, Public Works Director

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA Napa (707)

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP December 13, 2016

Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

1. Adopted the required findings for the project specified in Attachment A of the staff report dated February 6, 2004, including CEQA findings;

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

San Joaquin County Grand Jury. Getting Rid of Stuff - Improving Disposal of City and County Surplus Public Assets Case No.

San Francisco Business and Tax Regulations Code

RESOLUTION NO. P15-07

CHIEF REAL ESTATE OFFICER, 1949

REPORT TO THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY HOUSING COMMISSION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEET. DATE: January 12, 2018 HCR18-002

RESOLUTION NO. PC 18-14

RENT STABILIZATION BOARD. Honorable Members of the Rent Stabilization Board

ORDINANCE NO

STAFF REPORT FOR REZONE #R JANUARY 15, 2015 PAGE PC-1 CVH INVESTMENTS LLC 455 E. GOBBI ST UKIAH, CA 95482

Recording Requested by and When Recorded Return to: City of Pacifica Attn: Cecilia Quick City Hall 170 Santa Maria Avenue Pacifica, CA 94044

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION

Agenda Item No. 6E May 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, Interim City Manager

APPROVAL FOR ACCELERATED PROCESSING DIRECT TO CITY COUNCIL

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Transcription:

JAMES A. NOYES, Director COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS 900 SOUTH FREMONT AVENUE ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91803-1331 Telephone: (626) 458-5100 www.ladpw.org ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO: P.O. BOX 1460 ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA 91802-1460 IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO FILE: MP-5 The Honorable Board of Supervisors County of Los Angeles 383 Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 Dear Supervisors: RESOLUTION OF SUMMARY VACATION SLOPE EASEMENT - CANYON COUNTRY SUPERVISORIAL DISTRICT 5 3 VOTES IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT YOUR BOARD: 1. Find this action categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 2. Find pursuant to Section 8330, et seq., of the California Streets and Highways Code that: a. Pursuant to Section 8333(a) of the Streets and Highways Code, the easement has not been used for the purpose for which it was dedicated or acquired for five consecutive years immediately preceding the proposed vacation. b. Pursuant to Section 8334(a) of the Streets and Highways Code, the easement is excess right of way not required for street or highway purposes. c. Pursuant to Section 8334(b) of the Streets and Highways Code, the easement lies within property under one ownership and does not continue through such ownership or end touching property of another.

The Honorable Board of Supervisors Page 2 3. Find pursuant to Section 2381 of the Streets and Highways Code that the slope easement to be vacated is not useful as a non-motorized transportation facility and not needed for present or prospective public use. 4. Adopt the enclosed Resolution of Summary Vacation vacating the slope easement north of Old Soledad Canyon Road (vacated), described in Exhibit "A" of the Resolution. PURPOSE/JUSTIFICATION OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Sikand Engineering Associates, on behalf of JBH Development Company, the underlying fee owner, requested this vacation to eliminate an unnecessary slope easement, increase the property's buildable area, and remove from the record all public easement rights within their property. The vacation of the slope easement will not have a negative impact on any adjacent properties or to the roadway. No existing public utility easement will be affected by the proposed vacation. The slope easement being vacated was included in the design of the road in 1964 to protect the road right of way and adjoining properties. The easement, however, became expendable when your Board adopted a Resolution in April 1996 vacating Old Soledad Canyon Road that adjoins the slope easement. The road was relocated northerly as a result of development in the area. It is therefore in the County's interest to vacate the slope easement since it no longer serves the purpose for which it was dedicated nor is it required for general public access, circulation, or for bicycle paths and trails. Implementation of Strategic Plan Goals This action is consistent with the County Strategic Plan Goal of Fiscal Responsibility as the vacation of the slope easement will result in added revenue through assessment and taxation, eliminates unnecessary maintenance costs, and removes possible County exposure to liability. FISCAL IMPACT/FINANCING Vacation of the slope easement will not have a negative fiscal impact on the County's budget. A fee of $1,500 was paid by the applicant to defray the expenses of the investigation. The fee is authorized by your Board in a Resolution adopted May 4, 1982, Synopsis 62 (Fee

The Honorable Board of Supervisors Page 3 Schedule), and as prescribed in Section 8321(d), of the California Streets and Highways Code. FACTS AND PROVISIONS/LEGAL REQUIREMENTS The area to be vacated contains approximately 65,000 square feet and is shown on the map attached to the Resolution. The County, successor in interest to the State of California by State Relinquishment No. 286, acquired an easement for slope purposes in 1964. Said Relinquishment was recorded on December 8, 1964, as Instrument No. 3526 of Official Records, on file in the office of the Recorder of the County of Los Angeles. The easement is also delineated and labeled in Tract No. 45933, filed in Book 1200, pages 70 through 89, inclusive of Maps, on file in the office of the Recorder of said County. The Public Streets, Highways, and Service Easement Vacation Law allows your Board to voluntarily relinquish the County's interest over the slope easement. Adoption by your Board of our recommendations terminates the rights of the public to the vacated area and disposes of an unnecessary County slope easement. Your action will also result in the property being unencumbered of the public easement, thereby allowing the underlying fee owner to exercise their reversionary rights over the vacated area. ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION This proposed vacation is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), as specified in Class 21(a) of the Environmental Document Reporting Procedures and Guidelines adopted by your Board on November 17, 1987, Synopsis 57, and Section 15321 of State CEQA Statutes and Guidelines. IMPACT ON CURRENT SERVICES (OR PROJECTS) The County of Los Angeles Fire Department has found that no fire protection facilities will be affected by the proposed vacation. The County of Los Angeles Regional Planning Commission has determined that the proposed vacation does not conflict with the Countyadopted General Plan and that the vacation area is not suitable for bicycle paths and trails. Vacation of the easement eliminates County maintenance responsibility to the area.

The Honorable Board of Supervisors Page 4 CONCLUSION This action is in the County's interest. Enclosed is a Resolution of Summary Vacation, approved as to form by County Counsel. Upon adoption of the Resolution, please return the executed original and a copy to us for further processing, retaining an executed copy for your files. Public Works will record the Resolution and will return the executed original Resolution to you when recorded. One approved copy of this letter is requested. Respectfully submitted, JAMES A. NOYES Director of Public Works CVC:mrb 5:blcyncntryrsv Enc. cc: Chief Administrative Office County Counsel

RESOLUTION OF SUMMARY VACATION BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles that it is hereby found and determined that, the portion of real property dedicated to the County of Los Angeles for slope purposes, north of Old Soledad Canyon Road (vacated), legally described in Exhibit "A" and as shown by the map in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which right of way is located in the unincorporated area of Canyon Country, in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, is no longer needed for present or prospective public use based upon the following facts: (1) the easement has not been used for the purpose for which it was dedicated or acquired for five consecutive years immediately preceding the proposed vacation; (2) the easement is excess right of way not required for street or highway purposes; and (3) the easement lies within property under one ownership and does not continue through such ownership or end touching property of another. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the public easement in, over, and across said property for slope purposes legally described in Exhibit "A" is hereby vacated pursuant to Chapter 4, Part 3, Division 9, of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California, commencing with Section 8330. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the right of way to be vacated is not useful for nonmotorized transportation facility, that the vacation does not terminate any public service easement, and that no in-place public utility facilities that are in use would be affected by the vacation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Works be authorized to record the certified original Resolution in the office of the Recorder of the County of Los Angeles, at which time the slope easement vacated will no longer be a public easement. The foregoing Resolution was on the day of, 20, adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles, and ex-officio, the governing body of all other special assessment and taxing districts for which said Board so acts. APPROVED AS TO FORM VIOLET VARONA-LUKENS, Executive Officer of the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles LLOYD W. PELLMAN County Counsel By Deputy By Deputy CVC:mrb 5:blcnyncntryrsv

EXHIBIT "A" SLOPE EASEMENT S/O SOLEDAD CANYON ROAD (M0288106) That portion of Lot 155 of Tract No. 45933, in the unincorporated territory of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, as shown on the map filed in Book 1200, pages 70 to 89, inclusive of Maps in the office of the Recorder of said County, designated as "EASEMENT OF COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES SUCCESSOR TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR HIGHWAY SLOPES AND DRAINAGE PURPOSES". Total Area: 65,000+ square feet Description Approved James A. Noyes Director of Public Works By Deputy