Demolition of Three Heritage Properties in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue

Similar documents
5, 7 and 9 Dale Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement, 80 Bell Estate Road (Thornbeck-Bell House)

230 Oak Street- Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Bylaw Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

3390, 3392, 3394, 3396 and 3398 Bayview Avenue - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Islington Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Toronto Preservation Board Toronto East York Community Council. Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

377 Spadina Rd and 17 Montclair Ave - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Hazelton Avenue Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

307 Sherbourne Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

507, 509 and 511 Kingston Road - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

97 Walmer Road and Spadina Road Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Conversion Applications Final Report

Yonge Street and 3 Gerrard Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Church Street and 117 Dundas Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

178R Ossington Avenue Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

40-58 Widmer Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

1202 & 1204 Avenue Road Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Peter Street and 357 Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

111 Wenderly Drive Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

50 Wellesley Street East - Official Plan Amendment & Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

71-73 Saulter Street Common Elements Condominium Application Final Report

250, 252, 254 and 256 Royal York Road and 8 and 10 Drummond Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

10 St Mary Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Removal of a Designated Heritage Property under the Ontario Heritage Act 314 Jarvis Street

836 St Clair Ave W - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

49 51 Lawrence Avenue East and 84 Weybourne Crescent Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application Request for Direction Report

Richmond Street West Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

166 Clinton Street Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

25 Ballyconnor Court Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications Preliminary Report

1267 King Street West Zoning Amendment Final Report

CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

Church and Gloucester Properties Inclusion on Heritage Inventory

Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - College Street Properties

Church Street and Gloucester Street - Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

1 Valhalla Inn Road - Zoning Amendment - Preliminary Report

Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment

and King Street West Part Lot Control Exemption Application Final Report

39 Thora Avenue Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

2 Holiday Drive - Zoning Application - Preliminary Report

45 & 77 Dunfield Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

2800 Bloor Street West Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Applications Refusal Report

412 Church Street Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report

20 Edward Street Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Historic Yonge Street - Study Area Designation By-Law

Queen Street East Rental Housing Demolition Application Under Municipal Code 667 Final Report

250 Lawrence Avenue West - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications Preliminary Report

55 and 65 Broadway Avenue Rental Housing Demolition Application Final Report

75 The Esplanade - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

4650 Eglinton Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

2179 Weston Road Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium Application Final Report

507, 509 and 511 Kingston Road - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications Request for Interim Directions Report

250 Davenport Road - Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition & Conversion - Preliminary Report

21 Old Mill Road - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Heritage Evaluation 51A, 53, 53A, 63, 65, 67 Mutual Street

Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District WET 13 OZ and WET 13 RH

150 Eglinton Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

CITY OF VANCOUVER ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT

Yonge Street, 5-9 St. Joseph Street and 11-19, 25 St. Nicholas Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

Kingston Road - Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

Bloor Street West, 6-14 Oakmount Road and 35 and 37 Pacific Avenue Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Applications - Preliminary Report

50 and 52 Neptune Drive Rezoning Preliminary Report

144 and 150 Berry Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

200 St. Clair Ave W - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Weston Road (Phase 2) - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Lifting of the (H) Holding Symbol Applications - Preliminary Report

1061 The Queensway - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District ESC 44 OZ & ESC 44 SB

1327, 1329, 1333, 1335, 1337 and 1339 Queen Street East Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 Final Report

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

470, 490 and 530 Wilson Avenue - Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Applications - Preliminary Report

Bathurst Street Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition Application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 Final Report

66 Isabella Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

111 Pacific Avenue, 255 Glenlake Avenue and 66 Oakmount Road- Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

51-65 Quebec Avenue and High Park Avenue Residential Rental Demolition Application Final Report

1-25 Defries Street- Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED. 30 and 66 Humbert Street - City Initiated Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Final Report SUMMARY. Date: August 18, 2016

PREPARED FOR: ADI DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC.

50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No

Toronto Preservation Board Toronto East York Community Council. Acting Director, Policy & Research, City Planning Division

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT CASE

Zoning Options. Key Questions:

44 Jackes Avenue and 33 Rosehill Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

NOW, THEREFORE, THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CALGARY ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

666 Spadina Ave - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

71 RUSSELL AVENUE. PLANNING RATIONALE FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION (Design Brief)

Development Approvals

Deeming By-law, Maple Leaf Drive, Bourdon Avenue, Venice Drive, Stella Street and Seabrook Avenue Final Report

1 Blue Goose Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

355 King St W and 119 Blue Jays Way - OPA & Rezoning Applications - Preliminary Report

111 Plunkett Road (formerly part of 135 Plunkett Road) - Zoning By-law Amendment Application and Plan of Subdivision Application - Preliminary Report

Director, Community Planning, North York District NNY 10 OZ and NNY 10 RH

1370 Neilson Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Transcription:

REPORT FOR ACTION Demolition of Three Heritage Properties in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Date: January 30, 2018 To: Toronto Preservation Board Toronto and East York Community Council From: Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division Wards:Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale SUMMARY This report recommends that City Council refuse the demolition of three single family houses at 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue and the construction of one replacement building. The applicant has applied for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to allow for the construction of a 4-storey residential building with 26 units. RECOMMENDATIONS The Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, recommends that: 1. City Council refuse the issuance of a demolition permit for the heritage properties at 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act. 2. If the owner appeals City Council s decision to refuse the issuance of a demolition permit under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the heritage properties at 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the necessary City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the appeal. FINANCIAL IMPACT There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report. Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 1 of 22

DECISION HISTORY On February 4, 5 and 6, 2003 Toronto City Council adopted the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, enacted by Council on February 7, 2003 under By-law 115-2003. http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/bylaws/2003/law0115.pdf ISSUE BACKGROUND Development Proposal The Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning application is for the construction of a 4- storey residential building with 26 residential units on a development site in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District. The development site is located on the south side of Dale Avenue on three assembled and contiguous properties at 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue, each with an existing single family home. The three houses will be demolished and replaced with a new building that will have 7,923 square metres (85,286 square feet) of residential gross floor area. A Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by Phil Goldsmith Architect, dated August 23, 2017 and revised January 24, 2018 was submitted as part of the application to the City. On November 10, 2017 the owner of the subject properties appealed the Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning application to the Ontario Municipal Board. Description of the Properties According to the Heritage Impact Assessment, the original houses at 5 and 9 Dale Avenue were demolished in the 1940s with 7 Dale Avenue constructed in 1944-45 and with the construction of new houses at 5 Dale Avenue (1953) and 9 Dale Avenue (1954) approximately a decade later. Overall, 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue represent three mid- 20th century single-storey bungalow style houses located in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District within the Rosedale Ravine. 5 Dale Avenue includes a brick bungalow constructed in 1953 for Ralph Carrette Day, a former mayor of Toronto. This house incorporated design elements typical of midcentury bungalows including a prominent garage facing Dale Avenue. 7 Dale Avenue includes a custom designed bungalow constructed in 1944-45 that incorporates contemporary architectural design details. The 3300 square foot L-shaped house was designed by award winning Toronto architect Gordon Sinclair Adamson for Clare F. Woods, President of Crystal Glass and Plastics. The house, representative of the International style of architecture, features many modern design elements including an asymmetrical front façade incorporating a unique orientation, open floor plan, lowpitch roof with deep overhanging eaves and multiple large windows including numerous floor to ceiling windows. There is a gazebo structure in the rear yard of similar architectural design. Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 2 of 22

9 Dale Avenue includes a modest mid-century brick bungalow constructed in 1954. The bungalow is set well back from Dale Avenue, with a detached garage located closer to the street. Contextually, along Dale Avenue and the surrounding area, houses are 2, 2-1/2 or 3 stories in height, with architectural features typical of the late Victorian and Edwardian periods including, but not limited to, steeply pitched roofs with dormers and gables, brick walls with punched windows, bay windows and porches. Material selection of these houses includes brick and stone with decorative wood trim. Apartment style buildings are also located within the HCD. According to the South Rosedale HCD Study, most apartment style buildings were constructed in District between 1951-1970 and there are a few close to the subject properties including 40 Glen Road at the west end of Dale Avenue, 1A Dale Avenue, and a large complex just west of the development site at 21 Dale Avenue along the south side of the street. Policy Framework Provincial Planning Act and Policy Statement The Planning Act and the associated Provincial Policy Statement guide development in the Province. The Act states that municipalities must have regard for matters of provincial interest. Cultural heritage is identified in Section 2 (d) of the Act. The Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) issued under the authority of Section 3 of the Planning Act provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. The PPS sets the policy foundation for regulating the development and use of land. These policies support the goal of enhancing the quality of life for all Ontarians. Key policy objectives include: building strong healthy communities; wise use and management of resources; and protecting public health and safety. The PPS recognizes that local context and character is important. Policies are outcome-oriented, and some policies provide flexibility in their implementation provided that provincial interests are upheld. Policy 4.7 indicates that the Official Plan is the most important vehicle for implementation of the PPS. Policy 2.6.1 of the PPS directs that Significant built heritage resources and significant cultural heritage landscapes shall be conserved. Properties included on the City s Heritage Register are considered to be significant in this context. Conserved is defined in the PPS as the identification, protection, use and/or management of built heritage resources in a manner that ensures their cultural heritage value or interest is retained The Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2017) provides a strategic framework for managing growth in the Greater Golden Horseshoe region. Policy 4.2.7(1) of the Growth Plan states that cultural heritage resources, which includes built heritage resources, "will be conserved in order to foster a sense of place and benefit communities." Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 3 of 22

Official Plan The heritage policies in the City of Toronto's Official Plan provide the policy framework for heritage conservation in the City. The following Official Plan policies apply to the proposed demolition: Policy 3.1.5.4: "Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained consistent with the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, as revised from time to time and adopted by Council." Policy 3.1.5.5: "Proposed development on or adjacent to, a property on the Heritage Register will ensure that the integrity of the heritage property's cultural heritage value and attributes will be retained". Policy 3.1.5.26: "New construction on, or adjacent to, a property on the Heritage Register will be designed to conserve the cultural heritage values, attributes and character of that property and to mitigate visual and physical impact on it." Policy 3.1.5.32: "The impact of new development within or adjacent to HCDs will be " assessed to ensure that the integrity of the district's heritage values, attributes, and character are conserved." Policy 3.1.5.33: "Heritage Conservation Districts should be managed and conserved by approving only those alterations, additions, new development, demolitions, removals and public works in accordance with respective Heritage Conservation District plans." Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada The Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (Standards and Guidelines) is the official document guiding planning, stewardship and the conservation approach for all listed and designated heritage resources within the City of Toronto. The General Standards (1-9) and the Standards for Rehabilitation (10-12) apply to this project. http://www.historicplaces.ca/media/18072/81468-parks-s+g-eng-web2.pdf South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Study (2002) Section 5.3 of the Study states that the guidelines were established with a view to the "preservation of the existing architectural character of the district and its park like setting and streetscape as defined in the Heritage Character and Streetscape Character Statements." The intent of these guidelines is to "ensure development in the District enhances and sustains the unique character of South Rosedale, as defined in the Heritage Character Statement in this study." At the time the District Study was undertaken, four categories were established and all buildings were categorized as either "A", "B" "C" and "unrated". Of more than 1000 buildings in the area, the number of rated buildings was 724, or approximately 67% of Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 4 of 22

all building in the area and of that number 33%, or 357 buildings, were evaluated as category "C". The subject properties were evaluated as containing buildings rated as Category "C", which is defined in the District Study as "Buildings of contextual significance, which contribute to the heritage character of South Rosedale ". As the development proposal includes demolition of rated properties and a new replacement building, the following sections of the District Study apply: Section 5.3.3 Guidelines for New Buildings A. New buildings (and alterations and additions to unrated buildings) should contribute to and not detract from the variety and heritage character of the district. B. New buildings (and alterations and additions to unrated buildings) should be designed to be compatible with the heritage buildings, in terms of scale, massing height, setback, and entry level. C. The roof profile and the location of the eaves lines or the roof parapet should be designed so that the apparent height of the building is compatible with that of its neighbours and is not visually overwhelming to neighbouring buildings. Section 5.3.4 Guidelines for Demolition B. Demolition of buildings in the "C" category is "generally considered appropriate only if the proposed replacement building is equally able or more able to contribute to the heritage character of the district and is acceptable under these guidelines and the zoning by-law. " COMMENTS Staff have reviewed the HIA prepared by Phil Goldsmith Architect and carefully considered the Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning proposal with regard to the Provincial heritage policy context, the City of Toronto Official Plan heritage policies and the policies of the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District. The following sections discuss the proposed demolition, proposed new building, and comments on the proposal received by staff from the heritage conservation district advisory committee of the South Rosedale Ratepayers Association. Proposed Demolition In consideration of Section 5.3.4B identified earlier in this report, demolition of buildings in this category may be "appropriate" if the proposed replacement building complies with the HCD guidelines as well as the zoning by-law. As per the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Study (SRHCDS), all three properties at 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue were evaluated as category "C" which, by definition, contribute to the heritage character of the SRHCD. Early on in the application process, Heritage Preservation Services staff reviewed the Heritage Impact Assessment and raised concerns with the applicant about the proposed demolition of these three contributing buildings. Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 5 of 22

In the HIA, the applicants' heritage consultant reviews the District Plan and references that houses along Dale are typical of Edwardian to Victorian era. As such, the existing bungalows at 5, 7, and 9 Dale represent house forms that are rare in South Rosedale. Contextually, the bungalow style houses are single storey buildings with low roof profiles that sit within the landscapes of their respective properties. Each property gently slopes down from Dale Avenue along the north to the Bayview Valley ravine along the south with dense vegetation that includes a variety and large number of mature trees. Collectively, all three properties have front yards with a variety of landscaping including mature trees that screen view of the single storey buildings, as the landscaping is the predominant view from the street. The relevant Zoning By-laws are 438-86 and 569-2013. Under Zoning By-law 438-86, the R1 zoning category allows detached houses. Also, under Zoning By-law 569-2013, the site is zoned RD with a height limit of 10 meters and a maximum density of 0.6 times the area of the lot. The RD zoning category allows for detached houses. In this case, three existing houses on individual properties located at 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue, that contribute to the heritage character of South Rosedale will not be retained and integrated into the new proposal, but will be demolished and replaced by a 4-storey building that will occupy the assembled properties. The demolition of the existing bungalows will result in a loss of three contributing buildings in the District. Given that Section 5.3.4B is not satisfied, the proposed new building cannot be supported as it does not meet the zoning by-law and does not meet the guidelines for new buildings as described below. Proposed New Building The applicant consulted with City staff, the heritage district advisory committee of the South Rosedale Resident's Ratepayers Association (SRRA) and area residents. Through the consultation process the application was revised several times. The resulting condominium design is a proposal for a new 4-storey residential building of approximately 85,000 square feet, designed in a modern architectural style. The new building is designed by the Toronto based firm of Hariri Pontarini Architects (Attachment No. 3). The proposed 4-storey building is similar in height to existing apartment buildings in South Rosedale and the roof and eave line is similar to that of existing houses along Dale Avenue and in the District. The fourth floor is set back above the third floor of the building and the elevation design incorporates architectural features of houses along Dale Avenue including, chimneys, bay windows, and a roof pitch that provides visual interest along the length of the building. The building is divided into two sections, with the west section located closer to Dale Avenue with smaller front yards and with the east section set back from the street with a vehicular drop off and predominately hardlandscaped forecourt. Parking and garbage will be located in a below-grade garage with egress from the east end of the building. The proposed cladding materials are stone, brick, and slate and are similar to that of heritage buildings in the HCD. Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 6 of 22

In our review of the proposal staff considered the landscape setting, scale, massing, and height of the existing "C" rated houses on the development site along with the other contributing properties on Dale Avenue. The experience of the subject properties as viewed from Dale Avenue is that of three detached single storey houses in their landscape setting. The proposal for a single building with a footprint that extends across the assembled properties and with a height of 4-storeys (approximately 85,000 square feet) will have a significant visual impact on the landscape setting when viewed from the street and will negatively affect the HCD's park like setting. While efforts have been made to break down the appearance of the primary elevation, the scale and massing of the proposed building is not sufficiently mitigated by landscaping as the amount of front yard soft landscaping proposed is proportionally less than what exists on the subject properties and other contributing properties on Dale Avenue. At the same time, a relatively narrow side yard is proposed between the subject property and that of 3 Dale Avenue to the west. As such, there is insufficient space to allow for sufficient density and variety of landscaping to mitigate views of the west section of the proposed 4-storey building from Dale Avenue. While it is true that there is a neighbouring apartment style building at 21 Dale Avenue to the east, the building is significantly set back from the street with a deep and well treed front yard area. The result is that unlike the proposed development, 21 Dale Avenue has little impact visual impact on Dale Avenue. The proposed new building does not satisfy Section 5.3.3B of HCD as it is not compatible with the scale, massing, height and setback of the contributing buildings on Dale Avenue and as a result it has a negative impact on the park like setting of the South Rosedale. At the same time, the proposal does not satisfy Section 5.3.4B of the plan as the new building is not equally able or more able to contribute to the heritage character of the district and because it does not meet the zoning by-law as describe earlier in this report. Heritage Conservation District Advisory Committee of the SRRA A heritage district advisory committee was formed as per Section 5.2.6 of the District Study shortly after Council approval of the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District. As part of Heritage Preservation Services review process for this application, staff requested comments from the committee. A response to the proposal was received from the committee in November, 2017 recommending that the proposed development not be approved. The Committee's reasons included, but were not limited to, the demolition of three low-rise bungalows each in a garden setting as viewed from the street, the height of the proposed condominium building of 13.9m exceeding that of adjacent buildings on Dale Avenue, the appearance of the building from the street as having a significantly larger scale and massing than a nearby multi-unit building at 1A Dale Avenue and single family residences along the street that are adjacent to the Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 7 of 22

development property. The proposal was also compared with the co-op building at 21 Dale Avenue that is well set back from the street with large amounts of greenery in front, having minimal street presence. In addition, based on their own research of the subject properties and review of the HIA submitted by the applicant, the committee recommended to City staff that 7 Dale Avenue be individually recognized under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, as the house was designed by well-known architect of his time, Gordon Sinclair Adamson. Nomination On January 19, 2018 a nomination was formally submitted to Heritage Preservation Services by the community requesting that 7 Dale Avenue be considered under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. This nomination was accompanied by a report prepared by Letourneau Heritage Consulting Inc. Of note, is that the HIA submitted with the application identified that 7 Dale Avenue was designed by award winning Toronto architect Gordon Sinclair Adamson and is representative of the International Style of Architecture. HPS has conducted a preliminary review of the 7 Dale nomination and supporting research materials and have determined that the property has potential to meet the criteria for holding cultural heritage value under Part IV of the Act. Staff are currently reviewing the nomination in greater detail and will conduct additional research as needed as well as undertake an evaluation of the property under Regulation 9/06 the evaluation criteria used for determining significance. The results of this evaluation will be the subject of a future report. CONCLUSION The proposal to demolish the contributing "C" rated properties at 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue and to replace them with a new 4-storey building is not consistent with the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Study. As the proposal does not meet Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 8 of 22

the HCD Study, by extension it does not conform to the City's Official Plan heritage policies and the Growth Plan; and it is not consistent with the PPS. Heritage Preservation Services staff recommend refusal of the proposed demolition. CONTACT Paul Maka Acting Program Manager Heritage Preservation Services Tel: 416-338-1077; Fax: 416-392-1973 E-mail: Paul.Maka@toronto.ca SIGNATURE Gregg Lintern MCIP, RPP Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning Division ATTACHMENTS Attachment No. 1 Location Plan 5, 7 and 9 Dale Avenue Attachment No. 2 Photographs 5, 7 and 9 Dale Avenue Attachment No. 3 Proposal 5, 7 and 9 Dale Avenue Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 9 of 22

LOCATION PLAN 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue ATTACHMENT 1 The arrow marks the location of the properties at 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue The location map is for information purposes only. The exact boundaries of the property are not shown. Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 10 of 22

PHOTOGRAPHS- 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue ATTACHMENT 2 5 Dale Avenue- north view of house from Dale Avenue 7 Dale Avenue- north view of L-shape house with landscaped forecourt Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 11 of 22

PHOTOGRAPHS- 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue 7 Dale Avenue- view of partial south elevation 7 Dale Avenue- teahouse structure in rear yard Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 12 of 22

PHOTOGRAPHS- 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue 9 Dale Avenue- north view of property garage structure to left with house beyond Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 13 of 22

DRAWINGS- 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue ATTACHMENT 3 Drawings were prepared by Harari Pontarini Architects Context Plan Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 14 of 22

DRAWINGS- 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Ground Floor Plan (includes the Landscape Concept Plan) Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 15 of 22

DRAWINGS- 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Second Floor Plan Third Floor Plan Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 16 of 22

DRAWINGS- 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Fourth Floor Plan Roof Plan Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 17 of 22

Parking Plan 1 Parking Plan 2 Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 18 of 22

DRAWINGS- 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue North Elevation South Elevation Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 19 of 22

DRAWINGS- 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue West Elevation East Elevation Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 20 of 22

DRAWINGS- 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Perspective view looking southwest (Dale Avenue) Perspective view looking northwest (rear) Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 21 of 22

DRAWINGS- 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Design Detail- Primary Elevation Perspective view of proposal from Dale looking southwest Demolition of Heritage Properties 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Page 22 of 22