Guidelines and Best Practices for the Restitution and Compensation of Immovable (Real) Property Confiscated or Otherwise Wrongfully Seized by the

Similar documents
Legal Analysis of Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of Timor Leste and GTLeste Biotech. Legal issues concerning land and evictions

Summary of Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy for Infrastructure Development Project 2015

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

On the Rights of Landowners to Compensation for Restrictions on Economic Activities in Specially Protected Nature Territories and Microreserves

Understanding Real Property Interests and Deeds» By Brad Dashoff and John Antonacci. Understanding Real Property Interests and Deeds

FIRM ARTICLE ITALIAN LAW ON REAL ESTATE. Real estate matters are fundamentally regulated by the Civil Code.

THE EXPROPRIATION BILL

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE ASSIGNMENT OF RECEIVABLES IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE

European Federation of National Organisations working with the Homeless. Analysis by Tanja Šarec

TENANCY CHANGES POLICY

GUIDELINES ON SETTLEMENT OF ESTATES

DECLARATION OF PARTY WALL RIGHTS, COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, RESTRICTIONS AND EASEMENTS

Switzerland. Benedict F. Christ. David Jenny. Vischer. 1. General remarks about retention of title

CHIEF REGISTRAR S CIRCULAR NO. 11 OF 2004

TIMOR-LESTE EXPROPRIATIONS LEGAL FRAMEWORK APPROVED

ROUND-TABLE: PROPERTY RESTITUTION/COMPENSATION: GENERAL MEASURES TO COMPLY WITH THE EUROPEAN COURT S JUDGMENTS

Joint Ownership And Its Challenges: Using Entities to Limit Liability

On Land Privatisation in Rural Areas

ASSEMBLY, No. 266 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA THE ASSEMBLY. LAW No. 9235, dated ON RESTITUTION AND COMPENSATION OF PROPERTY

The original of this Certificate remains in the possession of the issuing authority

ON IMMOVABLE PROPERTY REGISTRATION. Pursuant to Articles 78 and 83 paragraph 1 of the Constitution, on proposal by the Council of Ministers,

Government Emergency Ordinance No. 54/2006 on the regime of the concession contracts for public assets ( GEO No. 54/2006 );

Park County Animal Shelter Gift Acceptance Policy Adopted 3/16/2017

NON JERSEY DOMICILED PROBATE & STAMP DUTY

ENSURING PRESERVATION OF THE IMMOVABLE CULTURAL HERITAGE OF MANORS

What Every New Zealander Should Know About Relationship Property

Lands Registry Regulation

DIRECTORATE DEEDS REGISTRATION SUB-SECTOR PROGRAMME. Title security of tenure to real property. Description

DRAFT LAW ON PROPERTY RESTITUTION AND COMPENSATION

Programme to rationalise international GMP inspections of active pharmaceutical ingredients/active substances manufacturers

Case Christ Carrying the Cross Dragged by a Rascal Gentili di Giuseppe Heirs v. Italy

Concession Contracts in Romania

On the right to social housing

Severing a Joint Tenancy. Severing a joint tenancy is the process by which you convert a Joint Tenancy into a Tenancy In Common.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SERVICE The Rental Agency Amsterdam

Wandsworth Borough Council. Tenancy and Rent Strategy

Title Transfer. When the title changes hands, this is called alienation.

Displacement and Relocation A. INTRODUCTION B. METHODOLOGY

LAW ON ALLOCATION OF LAND TO MONGOLIAN CITIZENS FOR OWNERSHIP

Standard for the acquisition of land under the Public Works Act 1981 LINZS15005

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS SEMITRAILER RENTAL

IPSASB Consultation Paper (CP): Financial Reporting for Heritage in the Public Sector Proposed comments from the FOCAL i working group

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 390 North Robert Street, St. Paul, MN Phone (651) TDD (651)

REPORTS ON TITLE. 2. Meet with the clients, in advance of the closing, to show them the title, explain the title to them;

COURT OF MILAN BANKRUPTCY - 2ND CIVIL SECTION * * * * * *

APPOINTMENT OF AGENT:

Expropriation. Recommended Policy Wordings (full): Lao National Land Policy. Context. Policy. Standard of Public Purpose

BLUEPRINT REAL ESTATE POLICY

AN-C57 MODIFICATIONS TO GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS GOVERNMENT PRIME CONTRACT F D-0006

Decree on State Land Lease or Concession

In light of this objective, Global Witness is providing feedback on key sections of the 6 th draft of the national land policy:

HKFRS 15. How the new standard affects revenue recognition of Hong Kong real estate sales before completion

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT (AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR EVICTIONS)

Overview of the Council's response to the fair housing complaint filed with HUD

Republika e Kosovës Republika Kosovo - Republic of Kosovo Kuvendi - Skupština - Assembly

South African Council for Town and Regional Planners

PRIVATE CLIENT DEPARTMENT DECLARATION OF TRUST FACT SHEET

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF EAST TIMOR MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

Ownership Data in Cadastral Information System of Sofia (CIS Sofia) from the Available Cadastral Map

WHAT IS AN APPROPRIATE CADASTRAL SYSTEM IN AFRICA?

IFRS - 3. Business Combinations. By:

Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia 16/2008 of 15 February 2008 CULTURAL HERITAGE PROTECTION ACT (ZVKD-1) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Treaty Claims Settlement Acts General Guideline

Participants of the Ministerial Meeting on Housing and Land Management on 8 October 2013 in Geneva

PROGRAM PRINCIPLES. Page 1 of 20

Global Witness submission on Myanmar s draft national land policy

A Good Governance Charter for Housing Co-operatives

Medical Assistance ESTATE RECOVERY PROGRAM

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. between THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND SOCIAL CARE OMBUDSMAN & THE HOUSING OMBUDSMAN

BY-LAWS OF THE SAINT BERNARD CEMETERY OF GLOUCESTER PREAMBLE

IC Chapter 17. Relocation Assistance

State of Palestine Decree Law No (6) of 2014 On Financial Leasing. President of the Palestinian National Authority

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 6 December 2007 *

Rules for the independent resolution of tenancy deposit disputes. 1st Edition, 1st April 2016

ABSTRACT Land Administration System in Lithuania

MITIGATION POLICY FOR DISTRICT-PROTECTED LANDS

CANADA - WITHDRAWAL OF TARIFF CONCESSIONS. Report of the Panel on Lead and Zinc adopted on 17 May 1978 (L/ S/42)

Difficulties in Creating a Notice filing System for Immovable Property

PROPOSED METRO JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: POLICIES AND PROCESS July 2015 ATTACHMENT B

White Paper. Proposed Legislative Fix to Problems Associated with Missing Shareholders and Nonresponsive/Non-locatable Heirs.

Shared Ownership Allocations Policy Islington & Shoreditch and Lien Viet Housing Associations

Government Gazette REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Assignment, Mutual Exchange and Succession Policy

Water metering Procedure for payment for supplied water in Estonia

A Joint UN-Habitat GLTN and FIG session CoFLAS: Progress Report

What is the Constitutional provision on foreign ownership of land in the Philippines?

INSTRUCTIONS FOR FINANCIAL ASSURANCES

A Guide to Supported Housing Partnerships

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS OF FLAT FOR LAND BASIS WİTHİN THE SCOPE OF URBAN TRANSFORMATİON PROJECT

Village At Pond View Woods Construction Contract Addendum

CHIEF REGISTRAR S CIRCULAR NO. 7 OF 2004

Croatia Law on Ownership and other Real Property Rights (adopted in 1996)

Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea Grenfell Rehousing Policy. Revision November 2017

Tenancy Changes Policy

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE

LEASEHOLD MORTGAGE. Mortgagor and Mortgagee agree as follows:

Summit Place Financial Advisors

APPENDIX 7. Housing Enforcement Policy V May 2003

BETWEEN. (Company No. ) (as the Assignor) AND. UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) BHD (Company No K) (as the Bank)

Transcription:

Guidelines and Best Practices for the Restitution and Compensation of Immovable (Real) Property Confiscated or Otherwise Wrongfully Seized by the Nazis, Fascists and Their Collaborators during the Holocaust (Shoah) Era between 1933-1945, Including the Period of World War II

Preamble In developing a consensus on these legally non-binding but morally important guidelines and best practices listed below for restitution and compensation of immovable (real) property, the participating states recognize that there are differing legal systems and that states act within the context of their own laws. 1. Recalling our joint commitment in the Terezin Declaration, which we incorporate by reference herein, including recognizing the importance of restitution and compensation of Holocaust (Shoah) related confiscations made during the Holocaust (Shoah) era between 1933-1945 and as its immediate consequence, to create by June 30, 2010, under the aegis of the European Shoah Legacy Institute, a set of legally non-binding but morally important guidelines and best practices for the restitution and compensation, where it has not been done, of immovable (real) property confiscated or otherwise wrongfully taken by the Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators during the Holocaust (Shoah) Era, and without prejudice to applicable international law and obligations; 2. Acknowledging the immeasurable damage done to Jewish individuals and communities as well as to other victims of persecution by Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators when their private and communal immovable (real) property was confiscated; 3. Recognizing that only part of immovable (real) property confiscated during the Holocaust (Shoah) has been recovered or compensated; 4. Noting also that the protection of property rights is an essential component of a democratic society and the rule of law; 5. Mindful of the priority given in the Terezin Declaration to meeting the material and medical needs of Holocaust (Shoah) survivors and other victims of persecution by Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators, and mindful that these needs may, inter alia, be met through the restitution and compensation of immovable (real) property; including the use of proceeds from heirless property; 6. Recognizing the State of Israel s special moral role as a home for the largest number of survivors of the Holocaust (Shoah); 7. Noting the recent 65 th anniversary of the end of WWII and defeat of Nazism and the subsequent end of persecution by Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators, we firmly believe that the formulation of the following guidelines and best practices marks a belated yet vital step in partially redressing the terrible wrongdoing resulting from the Holocaust (Shoah), and will be of profound and lasting significance;

8. Noting that these guidelines and best practices do not relate to any measures taken with respect to immovable (real) property prior to 1933. Likewise noting that no new rights are created with respect to any claims against a property of a state outside its own territory; 9. Recognizing that for most Holocaust (Shoah) survivors and other victims of persecution by Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators, their own and their families private immovable (real) property represented the principle source of their personal worth in assets and that for most communities communal immovable (real) property constituted the bedrock of the communities collective assets: Criteria for Guidelines and Best Practices We Participating States, in conformance with the Terezin Declaration, endorse the following guidelines and best practices for the restitution and compensation of immovable (real) property confiscated or otherwise wrongfully seized in the course of persecutions perpetrated by the Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators during the Holocaust (Shoah) Era between 1933-1945, including the period of WWII, and as its immediate consequence,. Countries may consider applying them as they develop their own national programs and legislation for addressing or revisiting the compensation and restitution of confiscated immovable (real) property. Our aim is especially to bring a measure of justice to Holocaust (Shoah) survivors as well as other victims of these persecutions, and their heirs during the period referenced above. The following guidelines and best practices will also bring greater stability and value to immovable (real) property markets by assisting to settle and regularize property titles that are clouded or cloudable because of confiscations and other wrongful takings perpetrated during the Holocaust (Shoah) Era between 1933-1945 and as its immediate consequence. a) Restitution and compensation laws should apply to immovable (real) property which was owned by (i) religious or communal organizations, or (ii) private individuals or legal persons and then subject to confiscation or other wrongful takings during the Holocaust (Shoah) Era between 1933-1945 and as its immediate consequence. b) In accordance with these guidelines and best practices, immovable (real) communal property is property owned by religious or communal organizations and includes buildings and land used for religious purposes, e.g. synagogues, churches cemeteries, and other immovable religious sites which should be restituted in proper order and protected from desecration or misuse, as well as buildings and land used for communal purposes, e.g. schools, hospitals, social institutions and youth camps, or for income generating purposes. Immovable (real) private property is property owned by private individuals or

legal persons, who either themselves or through their families owned homes, buildings, apartments or land, or who had other legal property rights, recognized by national law as of the last date before the commencement of persecution by the Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators, in such properties. c) Restitution and compensation processes should recognize the lawful owner or holder of other legal property rights as listed in property record files as of the last date before the commencement of persecution against them by the Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators during the Holocaust (Shoah) era between 1933 and 1945 including the period of WWII. d) The property restitution and compensation processes, including the filing of claims, should be accessible, transparent, simple, expeditious, non-discriminatory, inter alia by encouraging solutions to overcome citizenship and residency requirements, and uniform throughout any given country. Restitution and compensation procedures should not be subject to burdensome or discriminatory costs for claimants. e) Claimants should have unfettered and free access to all relevant local, regional, and national archives, including those in other countries, required to confirm the right of ownership and other legal property rights to immovable (real) property of victims of persecution by Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators. f) Decisions should be prompt and include a clear explanation of the ruling. g) Restitution of immovable (real) property should result in clear title to, not merely the use of, property belonging to victims and survivors of the Holocaust (Shoah) and their heir(s) as well as other victims of persecution by Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators. If former owners or their heir(s) are provided with genuinely fair compensation in lieu of restitution in rem, the current holder s title should be assured and no longer be clouded by the above mentioned victims claims against ownership. h) Restitution in rem is a preferred outcome, especially for publicly held property. When in rem restitution is not feasible or not possible without expropriating third persons property, other acceptable solutions may include substituting property of equal value or paying genuinely fair and adequate compensation. Transfer of property title or payment of compensation should be effected promptly. i) Privatization programs should not compromise claimants rights, including the right to claim property confiscated or otherwise wrongfully taken by the Nazi and Fascist regimes, and their collaborators during the Holocaust (Shoah) era between 1933 and 1945, including the period of WWII, and its immediate consequence. At the same time, restitution laws should provide protections for current good faith occupants of restituted property. j) States are encouraged to create solutions for the restitution and compensation of heirless or unclaimed property from victims of persecution by Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators. Heirless property is property which was confiscated or otherwise taken from the original owners by the Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators and where the former owner died or dies intestate without leaving a spouse or relative entitled to his

inheritance. The principles in Paragraph (i) should apply mutatis mutandis. From these properties, special funds may be allocated for the benefit of needy Holocaust (Shoah) survivors from the local community, irrespective of their country of residence. From such funds, down payments should be allocated at once for needy Holocaust (Shoah) survivors. Such funds, among others, may also be allocated for purposes of commemoration of destroyed communities and Holocaust (Shoah) education. k) States are encouraged to adopt property regimes and processes consistent with the Terezin Declaration and equivalent to these guidelines and best practices, and to take guidance from those states which have already done so, with respect to all victims of persecution by the Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators during the Holocaust (Shoah) era between 1933 and 1945, including the period of WWII, and as its immediate consequence. States may contact each other on matters related to the process of restitution and compensation of property, and the legal rights of their Jewish citizens and Holocaust (Shoah) survivors and other victims of persecution by Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators. States are encouraged to exchange with each other their experiences in the areas of restitution and compensation of properties referenced under these guidelines and best practices. l) Foundations and other non-governmental organizations established jointly by local Jewish and non-jewish communities and international groups, in particular the World Jewish Restitution Organization (WJRO), may assist claimants in the evaluation and preparation of claims and the management of restituted property confiscated or otherwise wrongfully seized by Nazis, Fascists and their collaborators and compensation payments with full transparency and accountability. States may also assist in the process of restitution and compensation of property without intervening in the judicial process of any other state. m) In order to review progress achieved on restitution and compensation of immovable (real) property, the European Shoah Legacy Institute will offer to host a conference in 2012.