Residential Construction in Farmland Preservation Zoning Districts

Similar documents
Working Lands Initiative

Transitioning from the Farmland Preservation Program to the Working Lands Initiative

Working Lands Initiative WI TOWNS ASSOCIATION December 2010

Farmland Preservation Agreements. -Frequently Asked Questions-

Farmland Preservation Plan

May 12, Randy Gilbertson Burnett County Land Conservation Department 7410 County Road K, #109 Siren, WI Dear Randy:

CHAPTER 4: STRATEGIES FOR PRESERVING FARMLAND

Farmland Preservation Agreements INSTRUCTIONS

Understanding the Clean and Green Program

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT: Our website is changing! Please click here for details.

LINCOLN COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR THE FARMLAND PRESERVATION PROGRAM

CHAPTER 352 COUNTY LAND PRESERVATION AND USE COMMISSIONS

Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update, Chapter 1 Plan Summary (Cover Document)

LEGISLATIVE PURPOSES. 2. Provide sources of agricultural products within the state for the citizens of the state

Rule 80. Preservation of Primary Agricultural Soils Revised and approved by the Land Use Panel during its public meeting on January 31, 2006.

Agricultural, Forest and Open Space Act of 1976 "Greenbelt"

DUNN COUNTY SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR THE FARMLAND PRESERVATION PROGRAM

APPENDIX "B" STANISLAUS COUNTY FARMLAND MITIGATION PROGRAM GUIDELINES

Understanding the Clean and Green Program

New York State Publication 51.1 Department of Taxation and Finance

Procedures Used to Calculate Property Taxes for Agricultural Land in Mississippi

Torch Lake Township Antrim County, Michigan

ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT A HISTORY OF PRESERVING FARMLAND IN MARATHON COUNTY April Marathon County. Land Conservation & Zoning Committee

TOWN OF WEST NEWBURY, MA PROCEDURE FOR CHAPTER 61, 61A, 61B RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSALS APPROVED ON FEBRUARY

Understanding. Clean and Green

The Land Division Amendments to the Subdivision Control Act

Sri Lanka Accounting Standard LKAS 40. Investment Property

Twenty-Four Years of Farmland Preservation in Michigan, PA 116. Kurt J. Norgaard. Ph. D. Extension Land Use Specialist

STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL. State of California GOVERNMENT CODE. Section 65915

RESEARCH BRIEF. Jul. 20, 2012 Volume 1, Issue 12

Clean and Green LEBANON COUNTY UNDERSTANDING THE PROGRAM

Application for 1-d-1 (Open-Space) Agricultural Use Appraisal

Appendix T Chapter VIII IMPLEMENTATION

Planning Commission Research Topic No. 1 (1995)

Town zoning: A good option for your town?

Columbia County. Farmland Preservation Plan

Natural Resources Assistance Council DISTRICT 12 - LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO

WB-36 BUYER AGENCY/TENANT REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT

2016 Highlands Region Land Preservation Status Report

Land Use. Land Use Categories. Chart 5.1. Nepeuskun Existing Land Use Inventory. Overview

Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) in Practice

AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM AGRICULTURAL LAND EASEMENTS

BLAIR COUNTY. UNDERSTANDING THE Clean and Green PROGRAM. COUNTY OF BLAIR Blair County Courthouse 423 Allegheny Street Hollidaysburg, PA

STAFF REPORT. Permit History:

Sec Planned unit development (PUD) zoning district requirements and procedures.

Business Item Community Development Committee Item:

PROPERTY TAX BULLETIN NO. 20 (Published under Appropriation No ) Issued February 4, 2008; Replaces January 5, 2005

13 NONCONFORMITIES [Revises Z-4]

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 320/373

KLAMATH COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Government Center 305 Main St., Klamath Falls, Oregon Phone Option #4 Fax

TDR RULES AND PROCEDURES TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) PROGRAM

CONSERVATION EASEMENTS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Kent/MSU Extension Attn: Stacy Byers 775 Ball Ave NE Grand Rapids, MI Tel: (616)

Planning & Zoning Department GENERAL APPLICATION 400 DeWitt Street - Portage, WI Phone: Fax:

Columbia County Farmland Preservation Plan

Subtitle H Agricultural Conservation Easement Program

Farmland and Open Space Preservation Purchase of Development Rights Program Frequently Asked Questions

HKAS 27 and HKFRS 3 (Revised) 9 August 2010

In December 2003 the Board issued a revised IAS 40 as part of its initial agenda of technical projects.

Appendix J Agricultural Land Preservation in Other States

Community Development Department

(2) Qualified tangible personal property purchased for use by a qualified person to be used primarily in research and development.

04.08 SPECIAL VALUATIONS AND DEFERRALS

Draft Hendersonville Zoning Ordinance SUMMARY

Open Space Taxation Act

PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT

AB 1397 HOUSING ELEMENT LAW SITE IDENTIFICATION STRENGTHENED OVERVIEW

Clean and Green ADAMS COUNTY UNDERSTANDING THE PROGRAM. COUNTY OF ADAMS Adams County Courthouse Baltimore Street Gettysburg, PA 17325

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING PROPOSALS

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 320/323

Understanding. Clean and Green. Lycoming County Assessment Office 48 West Third Street Williamsport PA (570)

Article 6: Planned Unit Developments

Comparison of Chapter CCC

Chapter 52 FARMLAND AND OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION

2018 Highlands Region Land Preservation Status Report

WEBSTER TOWNSHIP LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE. Summary Table of Amendments

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ARTICLE XXVI. TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) SECTION PURPOSE

ANNEXATION. The Handbook for Georgia Mayors and Councilmembers 1

In December 2003 the IASB issued a revised IAS 40 as part of its initial agenda of technical projects.

CCC XXX Rural Neighborhood Conservation (NC)

UNIFORM RULE 5. Administration of Williamson Act Contracts

1. The UAIZ shall not be established in areas that are outside the City of San Jose's USA/UGB.

Business Combinations

CHAPTER 15: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

SUBDIVISION GUIDELINES (As Approved by the State Agricultural Land Preservation Board on July 10, 1996)

RESIDENTIAL VACATION RENTALS

Chapter 20. Development Rights in the Rural Areas Zoning District in Albemarle County

The Financial Accounting Standards Board

Department of Planning & Development VILLAGE OF SOMERS REZONING PROCEDURES

Claudia Stuart, Williamson Act Program Manager and Nick Hernandez, Planning Intern

International Accounting Standard 17 Leases. Objective. Scope. Definitions IAS 17

BROCHURE # 37 OPEN SPACE

Central Lathrop Specific Plan

City of Puyallup. Parks Impact Fee Study

NC General Statutes - Chapter 106 Article 61 1

Town of. River Falls. Land Use Element Vierbicher Associates, Inc

ARTICLE VII TDR. 701 Purpose.

Township Planning & Zoning - A General Overview Prepared by: MAT Legal Staff Edited by: Kent Sulem, Attorney

Transcription:

Updated Draft: October 25, 2009 Residential Construction in Farmland Preservation Zoning Districts 2009 Wis. Act 28 repealed and recreated Wisconsin s Farmland Preservation program under ch. 91, Stats. Among other things, the new law creates new minimum zoning standards for residential construction in farmland preservation zoning districts (see Wisconsin Statutes ss. 91.42, 91.44 and 91.46). Background Farmers covered by a farmland preservation zoning ordinance are eligible for state income tax credits if the Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (DATCP) certifies that the ordinance meets or exceeds state farmland preservation standards. Among other things, a certified ordinance must restrict residential construction in farmland preservation zoning districts. Ordinance standards must meet or exceed the new state standards. A certified ordinance may not allow any residential use that is prohibited by the state standards. The new state standards apply to ordinances (and ordinance amendments) that are certified under the new law. Ordinances certified under the old law remain temporarily certified under the new law, but must eventually be recertified in order for farmers to continue claiming tax credits (deadlines vary). Farmland preservation standards do not apply to land that is rezoned out of a certified farmland preservation district. But the rezoning authority must make certain statutory findings and charge a statutory rezoning conversion fee before granting a rezone request. The conversion fee applies to rezones granted under a new or existing ordinance beginning January 1, 2010. The New Standards Overview Within a certified farmland preservation district: All residences must meet local zoning standards. Local standards for non-farm residences must meet or exceed state standards (local ordinance may be more restrictive).

Local standards for farm residences may be equivalent to or more lenient than local standards for nonfarm residences (local option). A conditional use permit is normally required. Local ordinance must require a conditional use permit for a non-farm residence (unless the residential parcel is rezoned out of the farmland preservation district). Local ordinance may require a conditional use permit for a farm residence (local option). A conditional use permit may authorize a small contiguous cluster of complying residences (local option, subject to state standards). Conditional use permit standards for a non-farm residence must meet or exceed the following minimum standards: The ratio of nonfarm residential acreage to farm acreage may not exceed 1 to 20 (0.05) on any base farm tract. There may be no more than 4 dwelling units in non-farm residences (nor more than 5 dwelling units in residences of any kind) on any base farm tract. The location of the non-farm residence (house and lot) will not convert cropland or prime farmland (if there are reasonable alternative locations), or significantly impair current or future agricultural use of other farmland. There is no longer a minimum lot size requirement. The new state standards encourage smaller residential lots that convert less farmland. If an ordinance still includes a minimum lot size requirement (local option), that requirement must be in addition to (and not in lieu of) the state standards. The result will be more restrictive than the state standards themselves. Residences that meet the new standards may be constructed within a farmland preservation zoning district without rezoning. There is no rezoning conversion fee because the land is not rezoned. Farmland preservation standards still apply (unlike rezoned land). The new standards do not regulate land divisions or parcel sizes as such, but only the "uses" to which those parcels are put. There is no per se limit on the size, shape or number of farm or open space parcels that may be created. 2

The new standards do not apply to residences that legally existed prior to the ordinance change ( prior nonconforming uses ). However: A prior nonconforming use may not be expanded (per normal law of prior nonconforming uses ). The number and location of existing residences may limit conditional use permits for new residences. Definitions Base farm tract means one of the following: All contiguous parcels in a farmland preservation zoning district that are part of a single farm when DATCP first certifies the farmland preservation ordinance under the new law (or on an earlier date specified in the ordinance), regardless of any subsequent changes in the size of the farm. Any other tract that DATCP by rule defines as a base farm tract. NOTE: The boundaries of all base farm tracts in a certified farmland preservation zoning district are determined on the same date. Once determined, those boundaries remain constant over time, even as actual farm boundaries change due to farm consolidations and splits. A base farm tract is not necessarily synonymous with a farm, except on the date when its boundaries are determined. Farm means land under common ownership (all owned by exactly the same person or entity) that is primarily devoted to agricultural use. NOTE: Land under common ownership that produced at least $6,000 in gross farm revenues in the previous year, or at least $18,000 in gross farm revenues in the preceding 3 years, is presumed to be primarily devoted to agricultural use. If a farm owner splits a parcel from the farm, and deeds it to another person, that parcel is no longer part of the original farm. A house built on the deeded parcel is not a farm residence (even if occupied by a parent, child or employee of the original farm owner) unless the deeded parcel qualifies as a farm in its own right. 3

Farm acreage means the size of a farm in acres. NOTE: For purposes of residential density calculations, farm acreage may also include open space parcels that are split from a farm if they are kept in open space use and contain no residential or other non-farm buildings. Farm acreage does not include non-farm residential acreage. Farm residence means any of the following structures that is located on a farm: A single-family or duplex residence that is the only residential structure on the farm or is occupied by any of the following: * An owner or operator of the farm. * A parent or child of an owner or operator of a farm. * An individual who earns more than 50 percent of his or her gross income from the farm. A state-certified migrant labor camp. NOTE: A local ordinance may adopt a more restrictive farm residence definition. Non-farm residence means any residence other than a farm residence. Non-farm residential acreage means the total number of acres of all parcels on which non-farm residences are located. NOTE: A residential lot, like a farm, may include land from 2 or more deed parcels. If a landowner proposes to build a nonfarm residence on land consisting of 2 or more commonly-owned and contiguous deed parcels, all of those deed parcels should be counted as part of the residential lot ( nonfarm residential acreage ) unless the landowner can show that some of the deed parcels are clearly devoted to nonresidential use (not just open space use). Prime farmland means any of the following: An area with a class I or class II land capability classification as identified by NRCS. Any other land designated as prime farmland in the county s certified farmland preservation plan. Protected farmland means land that is located in a farmland preservation zoning district, is covered by a farmland preservation agreement, or is otherwise legally protected from nonagricultural development. 4

Standards for Farm Residences A certified farmland preservation zoning ordinance may regulate farm residences. An ordinance may allow farm residences as permitted uses (without a conditional use permit) or conditional uses (with a conditional use permit), depending on local preference. A farm residence must be located on a farm parcel. A residence constructed on a separately-owned residential lot (split off from the farm and deeded to another person) does not qualify as a farm residence, even if occupied by a farm family member or farm worker. Example: Suppose that a local zoning ordinance requires a conditional use permit for a non-farm residence but not for a farm residence. The sole individual proprietor of a 200-acre farm deeds a one-acre parcel from that farm to his son. The son proposes to build a house on the parcel. The house will not qualify as a farm residence, because the residential parcel is separately owned and is no longer part of the farm. The son must get a conditional use permit to build the house, because it is considered a non-farm residence. The result is the same whenever a farm owner (individual, married couple or business entity) deeds a residential parcel to an individual or business entity that is not identical to the farm owner. A single-family or duplex residence may qualify as a farm residence if it is the only residential structure on the farm (regardless of who occupies it). An additional residence on the same farm may also qualify as a farm residence (even though it is not the only residential structure on the farm) if it is occupied by an owner or operator of the farm, a parent or child of the farm owner or operator, or an individual who earns more than 50 percent of his or her gross income from the farm. However, a change of occupancy may convert this farm residence to a non-farm residence. Example: A farmer owns a 200-acre farm parcel on which there are 2 houses (both owned by the farmer). The farmer lives in one of the houses, and rents the other to his son. An ordinance may treat both residences as farm residences (no conditional use permit required). But if the son vacates the rented house, and the farmer then rents that house to an unrelated person, the house becomes a non-farm residence (a conditional use permit is required for continued occupancy). 5

Standards for Non-Farm Residences Conditional Use Permit Required A conditional use permit is always required for a non-farm residence (unless the residence legally existed as a non-farm residence prior to the ordinance change, and thus qualifies as a prior nonconforming use ). A zoning authority may issue a separate conditional use permit for each residence or, if allowed by the local zoning ordinance, the zoning authority may issue a single permit covering an approved cluster of non-farm residences (see below). Standards for Issuing Conditional Use Permits A zoning authority may issue a conditional use permit for a non-farm residence if ALL of the following standards are met (a zoning ordinance may include additional or more stringent standards, but must ensure compliance with these minimum standards): Standard #1: The ratio of all nonfarm residential acreage to farm acreage on the base farm tract will not exceed 1 to 20 (0.05). Examples: A farmer operates a 200 acre farm when the farmland preservation ordinance is first certified under the new law (that 200-acre land area thus becomes a base farm tract ). The farmer subsequently sells a 7-acre parcel, and the purchaser applies for a conditional use permit to build a non-farm residence on that 7-acre parcel. The proposed residence meets Standard #1 because the ratio of non-farm residential acreage (7 acres) to farm acreage (now 193 acres) on the base farm tract does not exceed 1 to 20 (0.036 < 0.05). The same farmer then sells another 7-acre parcel, and the purchaser of that parcel also applies for a conditional use permit to build a nonfarm residence. The zoning authority may not issue a conditional use permit for that residence, because the ratio of non-farm residential acreage (now 14 acres) to farm acreage (now 186 acres) on the base farm tract would be greater than 1 to 20 (0.075 > 0.05). If the owner of the 200-acre farm had sold two 4-acre parcels, rather than two 7-acre parcels, the zoning authority could permit the construction of residences on both parcels, because the ratio of all non-farm residential acreage (8 acres) to farm acreage (192 acres) on the base farm tract would not exceed 1 to 20 (0.042 < 0.5). 6

If the original 200-acre farm were split into two 100-acre farms, the base farm tract would still be 200 acres (because the size of the base farm tract is determined when the ordinance is certified, and remains unchanged regardless of subsequent farm consolidations or splits): If one of the 2 farmers sells a 7-acre parcel, the zoning authority may permit the purchaser to build a house on that parcel because the ratio of non-farm residential acreage (7 acres) to farm acreage (193 acres) on the base farm tract (still 200 acres) will not exceed 1 to 20 (0.036 < 0.05). If the second farmer also sells a 7-acre parcel, the zoning authority may permit residential construction on one but not both of the 7-acre parcels because, if houses were built on both parcels, the ratio of all non-farm residential acreage (7+7=14 acres) to farm acreage (186 acres) on the base farm tract would exceed 1 to 20 (0.075 > 0.05). However, if each farmer sells two 2-acre parcels (rather than one 7- acre parcel), residences could be constructed on all 4 parcels because the ratio of all non-farm residential acreage (8 acres) to farm acreage (192 acres) on the base farm tract would not exceed 1 to 20 (0.042 < 0.05). If the original 200-acre farm is later expanded by adding another 150 acres (creating a farm of 350 acres), the base farm tract is still the original 200 acres for purposes of Standard #1. The 150 acres added from another base farm tract are still counted as part of that other base farm tract for purposes of Standard #1. The new law does not require any minimum residential lot size. If a local zoning ordinance nevertheless requires a minimum lot size, that local requirement will combine with Standard #1 to restrict residential development. For example: Suppose that a local government decides to keep a 35-acre minimum lot size requirement (even though it is no longer required to do so). If a farmer sells a 35-acre parcel from a 200-acre base farm tract, the buyer may not build a house on that parcel because the ratio of non-farm residential acreage (35 acres) to farm acreage (now 165 acres) on the base farm tract would exceed 1 to 20 (0.21 > 0.05). 7

By comparison, if a local ordinance has a 5-acre (not 35-acre) minimum lot size, and a farmer sells a 5-acre parcel from a base farm tract of 200 acres, the zoning authority may permit the buyer to build a house on that parcel because the ratio of non-farm residential acreage (5 acres) to farm acreage (now 195 acres) on the base farm tract will not exceed 1 to 20 (0.026 < 0.05). Standard #2: There will be no more than 4 dwelling units in non-farm residences (nor more than 5 dwelling units in residences of any kind) on the base farm tract. Examples: A farmer owns a 200 acre farm when the farmland preservation ordinance is first certified under the new law (that 200-acre land area thus becomes a base farm tract ). The farmer has one single-family farm residence on the farm. The farmer subsequently sells four 2-acre parcels, and each of the four purchasers applies for a conditional use permit to build a single-family non-farm residence on that purchaser s parcel. All 4 residences will meet Standard #2, because there will be no more than 4 dwelling units in non-farm residences (nor more than 5 dwelling units of any kind) on the base farm tract. There is one single-family farm residence on the original 200-acre farm ( base farm tract ). The farmer subsequently sells four 2-acre parcels: The purchaser of the first parcel obtains a permit to build a duplex on that parcel (there is no prohibition against multi-family dwellings, provided that Standard #2 is met). The purchasers of the 2 nd and 3 rd parcels obtain permits to build single-family homes on those parcels (because Standard #2 is still met). The purchaser of the 4 th parcel may not construct a residence on that parcel, because construction would cause a violation of Standard # 2. The owner of the original 200-acre farm sells 100 acres to another farmer (despite this farm split, the base farm tract is still the original 200 acres for purposes of Standard #2): The seller retains a 100-acre farm, including the existing singlefamily farm residence. 8

The purchaser farms the 100 acres that he has purchased, and builds a duplex residence on that 100-acre farm (no conditional use permit is required, because the duplex qualifies as a farm residence ). One of the farmers later sells 3 one-acre lots from his 100-acre farm, and the purchasers apply for conditional use permits to construct single-family residences. If the zoning authority grants the first 2 applications it must deny the third (construction on the 3 rd lot would violate Standard #2, because there would be more than 5 total dwelling units on the 200-acre base farm tract ). Standard #3: The location of the non-farm residence (house and lot) will not do any of the following: Convert cropland or prime farmland if there are reasonable alternative locations. Significantly impair the current or future agricultural use of other protected farmland. Example: A farmer sells a 5-acre lot, and the purchaser applies for a conditional use permit to construct a non-farm residence on the lot. The zoning authority finds that the proposed non-farm residence complies with Standard #1 and Standard #2. But before the zoning authority may issue a conditional use permit, it must also answer the following questions: Will the residential lot convert any cropland (other than woodlot) or prime farmland from agricultural use? If so, the zoning authority must deny the permit unless it finds that there are no reasonable alternatives. Will the location of the house or residential lot significantly impair or limit current or future agricultural use of other protected farmland? If so, the zoning authority must deny the permit. In its initial review, the zoning authority finds that the lot itself does not convert prime farmland or impair agricultural use of other protected farmland. However, the zoning authority finds that the proposed location of the house on the lot will impair agricultural use of neighboring protected farmland. The lot owner agrees to change the location of the house on the lot. The zoning authority finds that the new location will not impair agricultural use of the neighboring land, 9

and issues a conditional use permit allowing residential construction at the new location. Non-Farm Residential Clusters A zoning ordinance may authorize the local zoning authority to issue a conditional use permit for a cluster of 2 or more non-farm residences if all of the following apply: The residential parcels comprising the cluster are contiguous. Legal restrictions ensure that, if all of the proposed residences are constructed, each residence will meet the standards for non-farm residences (see above). Once a cluster permit is issued, parcel owners within the cluster may proceed with the authorized residential construction, without having to get another conditional use permit. Prior Non-Conforming Uses When a farmland preservation zoning district is created, or when zoning standards are revised, there may be some legally pre-existing residences that do not meet the new zoning standards. These prior non-conforming uses may continue to exist, but may not be expanded or modified in violation of existing laws related to prior nonconforming uses. Department of Agriculture, Trade and Consumer Protection (Draft 10/25/09) 10