Zoning innovations in support of place-making Ottawa examples

Similar documents
2607 Old Montreal Road, Ottawa, ON

LC Local Commercial Zone (Sections )

71 RUSSELL AVENUE. PLANNING RATIONALE FOR SITE PLAN CONTROL APPLICATION (Design Brief)

LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE

April 3 rd, Monitoring the Infill Zoning Regulations. Review of Infill 1 and 2 and Proposed Changes

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

Part 10 Mixed Use/Commercial Zones (Sections )

Part 5 Residential Provisions (Sections )

770 BROOKFIELD ROAD Site Plan Control Atlantis Investments November 2017

25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Streetscape Character Manual 1

Part 10 Mixed Use/Commercial Zones (Sections )

Chairman and Members of the Planning and Development Committee. Thomas S. Mokrzycki, Commissioner of Planning and Building

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

Omnibus Zoning Amendment (FILE # D ) Proposals

1202 & 1204 Avenue Road Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Part 10 Mixed Use/Commercial Zones (Sections )

2.35 BVT G Bow Valley Trail General Commercial District [ ]

PLANNING PRIMER. Elective: Understanding Residential Intensification and Infill. Planning and Growth Management Department.

12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Control % of fourplex additions on a particular street. Should locate to a site where there are other large buildings

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

PLANNING RATIONALE 680 BRONSON AVENUE OTTAWA, ONTARIO PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

Urban Exceptions (Section 239)

Director, Community Planning, South District

111 Wenderly Drive Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Accessory Coach House

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT

6208 Jeanne D Arc Boulevard North. Planning Rationale. Site Plan Control

SUBJECT: Character Area Studies and Site Plan Approval for Low Density Residential Areas. Community and Corporate Services Committee

Part 3 Specific Use Provisions (Sections 80-95)

SPECIALIZED COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL (CR) ZONES

Residential. Infill / Intensification Development Review

New Comprehensive Zoning

Urban Exceptions (Section 239)

50+54 BELL STREET NORTH

Urban Exceptions (Section 239)

(1) The following uses are permitted uses subject to:

Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment

HOLDING/ DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT

1. Multi-family dwellings, including town homes, apartments, or condominiums.

BYLAW NUMBER 159D2016

Plan Dutch Village Road

Kingston Road - Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

MARKHAM BYLAW REVIEW URA MARKHAM BYLAW SUB-COMMITTEE

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

RT-3 District Schedule

Part 3 Specific Use Provisions (Sections 79-99) (By-law )

774 BRONSON AVENUE MINOR ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT + SITE PLAN CONTROL PLANNING RATIONALE + DESIGN BRIEF

Urban Design Brief (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London

507, 509 and 511 Kingston Road - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

3390, 3392, 3394, 3396 and 3398 Bayview Avenue - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

MINOR VARIANCE REQUESTED:

PIN , Part 1, Plan SR-713 in Lot 2, Concession 5, Township of McKim (1096 Dublin Street, Sudbury)

M:\2016\116063\DATA\APPLICATIONS\SITE PLAN\PLANNING ADDENDUM\PLANNING BRIEF WATERFORD.DOCX.PAGE 1

111 Plunkett Road (formerly part of 135 Plunkett Road) - Zoning By-law Amendment Application and Plan of Subdivision Application - Preliminary Report

6040 Bathurst Street and 5 Fisherville Road Zoning Bylaw Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Part 4.0 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site

ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE

8.14 Single Detached with Granny Flat or Coach House Edgemere

Urban Exceptions 1,701-1,800

CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 2.1 Purpose COMMUNITY CONTEXT 3.1 Site Description Surrounding Uses...

Side Setback Amendments to the (RF3) Small Scale Infill Development Zone Options to amend side setbacks for Row Housing

5219 Upper Middle Road, Burlington

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

40-58 Widmer Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT JULY COMITÉ DE L URBANISME RAPPORT 34 LE 11 JUILLET ZONING 1008 SHEFFORD ROAD

566 Hilson Ave & 148 Clare St., Ottawa Planning Rationale June 20 th, 2014 Prepared by Rosaline J. Hill, B.E.S., B.Arch., O.A.A.

C-2C1 District Schedule

COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT CASE

Planning & Development. Background. Subject Properties

Residential Intensification in Established Neighbourhoods Study (RIENS)

100 Ranleigh Ave - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report

BYLAW NUMBER 20P2017

Urban Exceptions 2,001-3,000

49 51 Lawrence Avenue East and 84 Weybourne Crescent Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application Request for Direction Report

470, 490 and 530 Wilson Avenue - Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Applications - Preliminary Report

DECISION AND ORDER APPEARANCES. Decision Issue Date Thursday, March 22, 2018

S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A

5.0 Specific Use Regulations

1 Blue Goose Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

We contacted all RNOs in the area to come to their meetings and personally explain the draft, and take questions. Four RNOs took us up on the offer,

DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT

CITY OF ORILLIA Public Meeting of Council re Planning Matter Monday, February 8, :00 p.m. Council Chamber, Orillia City Centre A G E N D A

250 Lawrence Avenue West - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications Preliminary Report

Planning Rationale. 224 Cooper Street

AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER :00 P.M.

C-2B District Schedule

PUBLIC HEARINGS. Variance 1916, 1918 and 1920 St. Mary s Road (St. Norbert Ward) File DAV /2013D [c/r DASZ 28/2013]

166 Clinton Street Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

39 Thora Avenue Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

50 and 52 Neptune Drive Rezoning Preliminary Report

H4. Residential Mixed Housing Suburban Zone

Development Approvals

Transcription:

Zoning innovations in support of place-making Ottawa examples Alain Miguelez Program Manager - Zoning, Intensification and Neighbourhoods Planning and Growth Management Department, City of Ottawa

SUMMARY The challenges of zoning Turning a tool around Ottawa examples: The Mature Neighbourhoods by-law The Local Commercial by-law The review of minimum parking standards

The Mature Neighbourhoods By-law

A Bit of History

A Bit of History

A Bit of History

A Bit of History

A Bit of History

A Bit of History

A Bit of History

Lead-up to new by-law Two years of consultation 2012-147 Initial compromise with industry allowed front yard parking on all lots Appeal to OMB by some industry

Infill Over 1,600 units in 5 years (2010-14) On side streets Just in the Mature Neighbourhoods Outside Intensification Target Areas

Problems and Complaints Complaints Loss of green front Garage-dominated facades No interaction at grade Loss of on-street parking Snow storage challenges Excessive height Out of character Problems Zoning allows this Perception of market demand Where do you park? I agree, that is a horrible infill.

Purpose of By-law: LINK ZONING TO Streetscap e character Infill I: CHARACTER Grade Parking Relationship of buildings to streets Front yard hard/soft landscape Built form and block character Infill II: - Height, massing - Setbacks from side and rear yards

KEY PRINCIPLES Infill that fits

KEY PRINCIPLES Your street gives you your rules

KEY PRINCIPLES Fitting in properly with the streetscape trumps parking

KEY PRINCIPLES in other words, The wishes and convenience of one will not override the overall harmony of the whole street

Where does it apply? Mature Neighbourhoods Overlay

To what does it apply? Application for Development or Private Approach in Mature Neighbourhoods Building Permit Private Approach Permit leading to a parking space or driveway Committee of Adjustment consent for severance, minor variance Site Plan, Zoning Amendment You only do it once

HOW DOES THIS WORK? 1. What are the rules? 2. How do you apply them?

1. Align to your neighbours Front yard setbacks determined by alignment to abutting properties that face the same street

1. Align to your neighbours Front yard setbacks determined by alignment to abutting properties that face the same street

2. Use of land in the front yard YOU MUST PROVIDE A FRONT YARD THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE STREET'S DOMINANT CHARACTER. THIS OVERRIDES PARKING. IT IS A REQUIREMENT.

Front Yard Character Groups

The key to front yards Incidental use of lands It is EITHER: Amenity: a place for human enjoyment (vegetative or mineral landscaping, benches, planters, fountains, etc.) OR Utilitarian: parking, loading, storage

Walkway cannot abut driveway

Parking is not allowed on walkways

The right way to build a walkway Between entranceway and driveway 1.2 m. max. width From right of way to dwelling

3. Parking NO PARKING REQUIREMENT UNDER 12 UNITS BUILDINGS WITH 12+ UNITS HAVE A PARKING 'DEDUCTIBLE' FOR THE FIRST 12 UNITS Parking is permitted ONLY if it fits in with the streetscape character.

Parking and Driveway

3. Parking Where driveways are permitted, the maximum driveway width is: Lot width, or street frontage width Shared driveway Single driveway Double driveway Under 6 m 3.0 m Not permitted Not permitted Between 6.0 m and 7.49 m 3.0 m 2.4 m Not permitted Between 7.5 m and 8.24 m 3.0 m 2.75 m Not permitted Between 8.25 m and 14.99 m 3.0 m 3.0 m Not permitted Between 15 m and 17.99 m 3.0 m 3.0 m 5.5 m 18 m and more 3.0 m 3.0 m 6.0 m

Examples of shared driveway

Examples of shared driveway

'Shortened driveway' = front yard parking Unless legal, it's hard landscaping

Front Yard Parking Unless the applicant demonstrates that front yard parking has been legally established, this area is required to be documented as HARD LANDSCAPING. ⅓ or less

Front Yard Parking

Front Yard Parking

4. Front Doors YOU MUST PLACE THE FRONT DOOR AT A LOCATION THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE STREET'S DOMINANT CHARACTER. IF THE DOMINANT CHARACTER ON THE STREET IS TO HAVE A FRONT DOOR ON THE FRONT WALL OF THE HOUSE, YOU ARE REQUIRED TO PLACE YOURS THERE.

Front Doors

New zoning permissions Long semi Corner-lot wrap-around

Long semi-detached dwelling

Long semi-detached dwelling

Long semi-detached dwelling

Corner Lots

Corner Lots

Corner Lots

Streetscape Character Analysis How? What? What are the steps?

Streetscape Character Analysis Document the attributes of: Landscaping of front yard, interior yard, interior side yard and corner side yard Location of driveways, parking spaces and walkways Orientation of principal entranceways

Streetscape Character Analysis Dominant = the most frequently occurring 11 out of 21 = character group with 11 is dominant 8, 7 and 6 = character group with 8 is dominant 6, 5, 5 and 5 = character group with 6 is dominant 6 and 3 = character group with 6 is dominant This cannot be minor varied - it is a fact. 6 and 5 = character group with 6 is dominant

Streetscape Character Analysis

Patterns are found in Table 140(1)

Patterns are found in Table 140(2)

Patterns are found in Table 140(3)

Amsterdam

Brussels Oslo

Lisbon Paris

Barcelona New York

Chicago

Chicago

Ottawa

Ottawa

Ottawa

Ottawa

Local Commercial Study City-initiated Zoning By-law amendments for local shops and services in residential areas Images: Colin White

Zoning History The Impact of Zoning Euclid v. Ambler (1926) Segregated use zoning vs. Mixed-use zoning https://vimeo.com/123128997 https://vimeo.com/123128997 https://vimeo.com/123128997

Local Commercial Study Purpose: Introduce zoning within residential neighbourhoods to permit smallscale commercial (micro-retail) Provide opportunities for establishing neighbourhood services/conveniences Identify non-conforming stores and assign zoning that maintains the ability to operate local-serving businesses Identify streets that act as pedestrian/cyclist connections to larger mainstreets/destinations for new commercial opportunities The STUDY AREA = mature residential neighbourhoods in Wards 12, 13, 14, 15, 17 and 18

Existing Local Commercial

Existing Local Commercial

BEFORE AFTER

BEFORE AFTER

Public Questionnaire Are there any small scale commercial/retail (corner stores, barber shops, coffee shops, small restaurants, small Laundromats, small florists, etc) sites located in your residential neighbourhood? Do you typically walk, cycle, or drive to local commercial sites? Are you aware of any sites that were once commercial and have since been converted to residential? Would you have any concerns if a drive-through facility were located close to your home?

Public Questionnaire What type of commercial and service/convenience uses would you like to see in a residential neighbourhood? What connector streets in the neighbourhood serve as a primary pedestrian/cyclist connection to the larger mainstreets? Image by Colin White

Do you typically Walk, Cycle or Drive to Local Commercial sites? 90% 84.68% 84.96% 80% 70% 71.03% 60% 50% 40% 30% 28.97% 20% 10% 15.32% 15.04% 0% Walk Bicycle Drive Yes No

What type of local commercial and service/convenience uses would you like in your residential neighbourhood? 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Yes No

Public Consultation Study launched in November 2013; newspaper advertisements, study website, public online questionnaire, postcards/posters in local shops, and e-mail blast to all registered community groups Study updates via the website August 2014, January 2015, March 2015 Formal notice of proposal January 2015 with newspaper advertisements and letters to affected property owners and community groups. Public Meeting (community information session) January 21, 2015 (approx. 80 attendees). All property owners notified April 29, 2015 via mail.

Zoning approach Existing little stores in neighbourhoods: Updated zoning to allow more commercial uses, cap size, remove parking requirement New zoning permissions for little stores Residential root zone, commercial suffix with specific provisions

Existing stores: LCc Neighbourhood Commercial zone (LCc) created as a new subzone in Local Commercial Zones Typically larger sites that permit residential or commercial Predominantly existing Local Commercial zoned sites Animal Care Establishment Artist studio Bank / Bank Machine Community Gardens Health & Resource Centre Convenience store Day Care Instructional facility Library Medical facility Personal service business Post Office (ancillary) Restaurant Retail store Retail food store Service & Repair Shop Small batch brewery

New little stores: Suffix -c The Residential Neighbourhood Commercial permits local commercial business opportunities that fits within the character of a residential neighbourhood RESIDENTIAL ROOT ZONE Suffix c permits commercial Artist studio Convenience store Instructional facility Medical facility Personal service business Restaurant (conditional) Retail store Retail food store

New little stores: Suffix -c Commercial provisions Commercial use restricted to ground floor and basement Must be located in a building with a residential component (at least one dwelling unit) Maximum total size of commercial is 100 m 2 Parking is not permitted for commercial use Allow small outdoor patio / seating area on corner lots, max 10 m 2 Manage waste & recycling on site

Impact Zoning amendments that benefit: 70 legal non-conforming businesses 315 residential properties situated to permit micro-scale commercial 125 existing commercial properties that will be rezoned to better align with the Official Plan Recommendation 2 = phase 2 study

Examples

Examples

Examples

Examples

Examples

Currently underway REVIEW OF MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS

VIDEO

Study information WWW.OTTAWA.CA/ MINIMUMPARKING Discussion paper FAQ s Video As we heard it