ZEKIAH WATERSHED RURAL LEGACY AREA

Similar documents
The Maryland Rural Legacy and CREP Easement Programs

Public Information Meeting: Mattapany Rural Legacy Area - Proposed Expansion

PROTECTING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED. C. Ronald Franks Audrey Scott

Central Pennsylvania Conservancy Project Selection Criteria Form

Montgomery County Demographics

Land Preservation Programs Valuation Discussion

General Development Plan Background Report on Agricultural Land Preservation

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 1272 A BILL ENTITLED

Taxes and Land Preservation Computing the Capital Gains Tax

Preserving Forested Lands

Innovative Local Government Land Conservation Techniques

ORDINANCE NO. ORD-2014-

LAND USE ELEMENT PLAN

PROJECT SCORING GUIDANCE. Introduction: National Proiect Selection:

Frederick County Agricultural Land Preservation Program

Otto Farm LLC, Shepherdstown Pike

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA October 25, :00 A.M. HOPEWELL MANOR EXPANSION PROJECT Jason Divelbiss (attachment)

Article XII. R-1 Agricultural-Low Density Residential District

Implementation Guidance for The Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of 2012 Senate Bill 236

Kefauver-Canfield RLP Aerial

(a) Administrator: "Administrator" means the county employee assigned to administer the provisions of this subtitle.

ARTICLE XI - CONSERVATION SUBDIVISIONS

Chapter XX Purchase of Development Rights Program

RLP Staff Policies Reviewing Title Commitments

Preserving Maryland s Civil War Battlefields

Passaic County Open Space, Farmland, & Historic Preservation Trust Fund

The Maryland Puritan Tiger Beetle Habitat Conservation Program

SENATE BILL 236. Read and Examined by Proofreaders: Sealed with the Great Seal and presented to the Governor, for his approval this

Rural Legacy Program (RLP) Information

Implementation Guidance. for. The Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of Senate Bill 236

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING BOARD THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Article 3 - Rural Districts

OPEN SPACE & RECREATION PLAN

ANSWERS TO COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT AGRICULTURAL LAND VALUE IN KANSAS

Open Space Preservation Program

Appendix J Agricultural Land Preservation in Other States

CZMP Workshop Preserving Your Community & The Environment From Development Impacts

113,923,000. Article 1 Sec moves to amend H.F. No as follows: 1.2 Delete everything after the enacting clause and insert:

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund (ENRTF) M.L Work Plan

DRAFT FOR PUBLIC HEARING (rev. March, 2016)

APPENDIX B COMPLIANCE WITH THE GOVERNMENT CODE

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

Open Space Model Ordinance

Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) in Practice

Background and Eligibility Information

How Georgia Helped A Fast Growth County Capture Pristine Forest Land While Creating a Model for Other Communities

KAPITI COAST DISTRICT RESERVES ACQUISITION STRATEGY

Natural Resources Assistance Council DISTRICT 12 - LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO

4. facilitate the construction of streets, utilities and public services in a more economical and efficient manner;

RESEARCH BRIEF. Oct. 31, 2012 Volume 2, Issue 3

Welcome. Tax & Ecology Seminar. presented by The Georgian Bay Land Trust

Residential Capacity Estimate

Background and Eligibility Information

Kent Land Trust Strategic Reassessment Project Final Report

Cecil County, Maryland Purchase of Development Rights Program APPLICATION TO SELL AN EASEMENT

Transferable Development Credits

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

Protecting Farmland in Maryland: A Review of the Agricultural Land Preservation Program

Understanding. Clean and Green

Notice of Continuance Land Classified as Current Use or Forest Land Chapter and Revised Code of Washington

WHEREAS, the staff of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission recommended APPROVAL of the application with conditions; and

Understanding the Clean and Green Program

[First Reprint] SENATE, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED SEPTEMBER 17, 2018

IRS FORM 8283 SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENT DONATION OF CONSERVATION EASEMENT

Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund Request for Proposals (RFP)

Conservation Design Subdivisions

Greene Land Trust. Balancing Sound Development and Effective Conservation

SUBCHAPTER 59F CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (CREP) STATE PORTION OF THE PROGRAM

Summary of Project Proposal Awards 2010 Walton Family Foundation Conservation Grants Arkansas/Louisiana/Mississippi

Parkland Dedication By-Law User Guide

Transfer of Development Rights

Four American TDR Programs

Applying Open Space Design Techniques Lowell, MA 5/21/13

Preserving Agricultural Land by Transferring Residential Density in Calvert County, Maryland Presentation by Jenny Plummer-Welker, Principal Planner

Mount St. Helens Project Update Conservation and Economic Development March 16, 2011

WHEREAS, the staff of The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission recommended APPROVAL of the application with conditions; and

SALE OF PUBLIC LAND IN ALBERTA RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVING REGULATION, POLICY AND PROCEDURES

Conservation & Development Policies: The Plan for Connecticut

Savannah District. Regulatory Program. reg199.ppt 1

Hinesburg Natural Resources/Land Conservation Trust Fund. Introduction

Maryland Scenic Byways Resource Protection Methodology Sustaining the road less traveled

Notice of Continuance Land Classified as Current Use or Forest Land RCW Chapter and 84.33

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 769 A BILL ENTITLED

Using Easements to Conserve Biodiversity. Jeff Lerner Defenders of Wildlife

Master Plan Review POTOMAC. Approved and Adopted March Updated January 2013

You have a special connection to your land.

Springfield Protected Properties

Wood River Land Trust Staff Report

A Discussion of Real-Life Tax Revenue Impact on Agricultural Counties

78th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled

Interpretation of Conservation Purpose INTERNAL REVENUE GUIDANCE AS TO WHAT CONSTITUES A CONSERVATION PURPOSE

Torch Lake Township Antrim County, Michigan

BROCHURE # 37 OPEN SPACE

Lessard Sams Outdoor Heritage Council

Environmental Credit Offsets: Not Just for Wetlands Transportation Engineers Association of Missouri

TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) ORDINANCE Revised November 2013

PROPERTY TAX BULLETIN NO. 20 (Published under Appropriation No ) Issued February 4, 2008; Replaces January 5, 2005

About Conservation Easements

APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE

Using Agricultural and Forest Land Values to Estimate the Budgetary Resources Needed to Triple Maryland s Preserved Acres

Transcription:

ZEKIAH WATERSHED RURAL LEGACY AREA

GRANT AWARDS AND ACRES PRESERVED Since 1998, the County has received 8 grant awards totaling $9.4 million. With those funds, 2,328 acres have been protected on 18 properties. $7.5 million in outstanding grant requests; represents approximately 1,000 additional acres

THE CURRENT METHOD FOR DETERMINING EASEMENT VALUE County obtains 2 independent appraisals to establish the Fair Market Value (as though property was being sold in fee) The 2 appraisals must be within 20% of each other, or a 3rd appraisal is needed An Agricultural Value is computed using a formula from the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation The Easement Value is the difference between the appraised Fair Market Value and the calculated Agricultural Value

COST AND TIME ELEMENT FOR APPRAISALS Each appraisal takes 4-6 weeks to obtain and can run out to 10-12 weeks if a 3rd appraisal is needed The average cost of each appraisal is $2000 To date, the County has obtained 35 appraisals for the Rural Legacy Program at a cost of $73,750

Easement Valuation System (EVS) An Easement Valuation System (EVS) is a method by which the value to be paid for a conservation easement is determined partially by appraisal and partially by a point system for natural resources County and Department of Natural Resources' staff worked together to develop an EVS for Rural Legacy Acquisitions Models were used from other Rural Legacy Areas as well as the County's Ranking System for Agricultural Land Preservation Easement Purchases

RURAL LEGACY SPONSORS USING EASEMENT VALUATION SYSTEMS (EVS) 25 of 30 use EVS Agricultural Security Corridor Anne Arundel South Baltimore County Coastal Bear Creek Calvert Creeks Dividing Creek Manor Mattapany Mid-Maryland Frederick Mid-Maryland Montgomery Mid-Maryland Washington Carrollton Manor Coastal Bays Fair Hill Foreman Branch Gunpowder River Huntersville Nanticoke River North Calvert Patuxent River Piney Run Quantico Creek Upper Patapsco Lands End Little Pipe Creek Long Green Valley Lower Deer Creek Valley Upper Patuxent Watershed Montgomery Upper Patuxent Watershed Howard Zekiah Watershed

THE EASEMENT VALUATION SYSTEM (EVS) IS DESIGNED TO... Establish a Fair Market Value linked to the most recent appraisals available through the Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation (MALPF) Pay for easements commensurate with the resource qualities of the land (agriculture, forestry, habitat, etc) Set a minimum easement value of 50% of the Fair Market Value (tied to minimum % of MALPF purchase offers) Set a maximum easement value of 80% of Fair Market Value (tied to historical MALPF easement values)

THE PROPOSED EASEMENT VALUATION SYSTEM (EVS) ASSIGNS POINTS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING THREE PROPERTY ATTRIBUTES... LAND EVALUATION (240 Points) Soil Capability (Max 100): points awarded to soils with the least limitations for crop production Soil Productivity (Max 20): assigns points based on capability of soils to produce a certain yield with a specified system of management Property Size (Max 40): compared to average farm size in the County Area Devoted to Agricultural Use (Max 40): crop fields, pasture, farm buildings Forest Resources (Max 40): assigns points for land devoted to forest management

NATURAL RESOURCES (120 Points) Stream Buffer Protection (Max 40): vegetated buffers along streams Habitat Protection ( Max 40): number of acres that provide habitat for rare, threatened and endangered species Green Infrastructure/Forest Interior Dwelling Species FIDS Habitat (Max 40): considers the presence of FIDS habitat and its association with a riparian corridor

PRIORITY PRESERVATION AREA STATUS (120 Points) Concentration of Conserved Lands (Max 40): assigns points based on number of acres within a one mile radius that are in a preservation program Strategic Preservation Location (Max 15): assigns points to the property if it has adequate road frontage to support a major subdivision Contiguity to Preserved Lands and Easement Properties (Max 65): assigns points based on the number of contiguous acres under permanent preservation

EXAMPLE Calculation of Base Easement Value Fair Market Value (average of MALPF Appraisals) $9,000/acre x.50 Base Easement Value $4,500/acre Calculation of Additional Value Additional Points 285 x.10 28% 28% x (FMV) $9,000 = $2,520/acre Easement Value Base Easement Value Additional Value $4,500/acre + $2,500/acre $7,020/acre ************************************************************************* (Maximum easement value of 80% = $7,200)

CURRENT POLICY FOR RESERVED DEVELOPEMNT RIGHTS Development Rights can only be reserved at a density of one dwelling per 50 acres There is a $10,000 deduction from the easement value for each development Right reserved Pre-existing dwellings receive the deduction if the right to subdivide them off of the property is reserved

PROPOSED POLICY FOR RESERVED DEVELOPEMNT RIGHTS WITH THE EASEMENT VALUATION SYSTEM (EVS) Development Rights can only be reserved at a density of one dwelling per 50 acres The value of the easement will be reduced by 3 times the Fair Market Value for each development right reserved (currently would be $27,000) Pre-existing dwellings receive the deduction if the right to subdivide them off of the property is reserved

EASEMENT VALUATION SYSTEMS (EVS) PROS Saves on significant appraisal costs Allows an easement value to be calculated within a few days as opposed to several weeks Acts as a mechanism to prioritize acquisitions based on the value of natural resources Sets a cap on easement value paid (no more than 80% of Fair Market Value) Allows sponsor to revert back to the individual appraisal method, if necessary CONS Dependent on MD Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation Appraisals

COMMISSIONER ACTION REQUESTED Approve the proposed Easement Valuation System (EVS) for Rural Legacy Easement Acquisitions as prepared by County and DNR staff which includes the revised deduction for reserved development rights