Civil Action COMPLAINT vs. Plaintiffs

Similar documents
GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

TRIAL BRIEF ON TRANSFER DEVELOPMENT CREDITS

GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.

JOH. Plaintiff, Randolph Township Industrial Complex, a New Jersey. Partnership, by way of Complaint against the defendants, says: FIRST COUNT

Plaintiff, Defendant. Plaintiff, a New Jersey corporation, having its principal. office at 130 Davidson Avneue, Somerset, Somerset County, New

AGREEMENT ON CONSOLIDATION AND FAIR SHARE

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO.: 3d TRIAL COURT CASE NO MARIA T.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

FILED: ERIE COUNTY CLERK 02/26/2014 INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/26/2014

Case 2:12-cr PMP-PAL Document 27 Filed 06/06/13 Page 1 of 5

BOOKHAMMER ESTATES ) HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) C.A. No. v. ) ) GEOFFREY W. KLOPP and ) LYNNETTE L. KLOPP, ) ) Defendants.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/29/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/29/2016

ORDER AND JUDGMENT dl feg&e pi (OLD BRIDGE)

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA

MARK A. REMSA, P.P., being of full age, hereby certifies as follows: 1. I, Mark A. Remsa, P.P. am the Board Planner for the Monroe Township

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR YAKIMA COUNTY ) ASSESSMENT JUDGMENT SALE

Case 9:15-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/19/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

1. This is an action to challenge the Property Appraiser's assessment in. Plaintiff, UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD., a

Case 2:13-cv BCW Document 2 Filed 09/03/13 Page 1 of 9

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 04/15/ :57 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 70 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/15/2015 EXHIBIT 1

MER-L /28/2018 5:36:42 PM Pg 1 of 14 Trans ID: LCV

Town of Morristown PLANNING BOARD and ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT 200 South Street Morristown, NJ APPLICATION GUIDELINES

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CLAY COUNTY, FLORIDA

SENATE, No. 826 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 215th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2012 SESSION

' f7 - p, RE: URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER NEW BRUNSWICK VS. MAYOR S COUNCIL OF THE BORO OF CARTERET. ET ALS DEAR MR. SEARING:

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY 11-01

1. The continued delay by the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing ("COAH") in

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/22/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/22/2012

Plaintiff, SUMMONS WITH VERIFIED COMPLAINT. Nassau County is designated by -against- Plaintiff as the place of trial

Spending Plan TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/05/ :48 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 79 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/05/2018

SUPERIOR 'COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION - MIDDLESEX COUNTY. Docket No. C URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER NEW BRUNSWICK, et al.

Before Judges Fuentes, Koblitz and Suter. On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Bergen County, Docket No. C

CIVIL CASES COUNTY COURT

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/23/ :52 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/23/2016

Courthouse News Service

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF PAGE 1

CIRCUIT COURT SUMMONS

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS

[Hodges v. Sasil Corp., 189 N.J. 210, 221 (2007).]

TOWNSHIP OF MOORESTOWN ORDINANCE NO

RESOLUTION. by the West Windsor Township Council, pursuant to the Local Redevelopment and Housing Act, N.J. S.A. 40A:12A -I et seq.

!t,m«h»l»tll "' < ' : ' '' " LiOMKHHOT COVXTT COfHT SOMWRvitwa, Xwiy *i«r«sair O.HH?6. July 29, 1975

Notice to All Municipal Clerks & Administrative Agents

Case 6:18-cv CJS Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

DRAFT- SUBJECT TO REVISIONS BEFORE FILING

JUSTICE COURT, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA. Name: ) ) CASE NO.: Landlord, ) DEPT. NO.: ) -vs- ) ) Name: ) Address: ) ) Phone: ) )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/06/ :20 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 47 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/06/2016

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

Case 1:10-cv FAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/19/2012 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:08-cv TS -BCW Document 2 Filed 05/23/08 Page 1 of 6

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2016. Index No. [type in Index No]

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZET. A motcsstonal COR»OAATtON ATTORNEYS AT LAW PLAZA 9 BUILDING BOO ROUTE 9 P.O. BOX IO WOODBRIOGE. N. J.

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE KENT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

CONDOMINIUM FORECLOSURE

E.W. THE ALLAN-DEANE CORPORATION, ) a Delaware corporation, qualified ) to do business in the State of ) New Jersey, )

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/18/ :12 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 4 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/18/2014

380 US 46, SOUTH HACKENSACK, NJ

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/22/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/22/2018

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

1. The Plaintiff, PRESBYTERIAN RETIREMENT COMMUNITIES, [NC., 2. Plaintiff is a Florida not-for-profit corporation properly registered with the Florida

Docket No Motion No BRIEF AND APPENDIX IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL AN INTERLOCUTORY ORDER AND STAY ENFORCEMENT PENDING APPEAL

REO REDACTED CURRENT OWNER SEARCH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2. Plaintiff is a Florida not-for-profit corporation properly registered with the Florida

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS APPEALS COURT. TRUSTEES OF THOMAS GRAVES LANDING CONDOMINIUM TRUST & another 1. vs. PAUL GARGANO & another.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS

1. As of January L,20L4,legaI title to the Subject Property was vested in The

CIVIL ACTION COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Wholesale Relators Supply Co., by and through its attorneys Margolis Edelstein,

BUSCH AND BUSCH COUNSELLORS AT LAW 99 BAYARD STREET P. O. BOX 33 NEW BRUNSWICK, N. J

BARBARA J. WILLIAMS, of full age, being duly sworn. 1. I am the attorney for plaintiffs in the abovereferenced

NOW COME Plaintiffs Elizabeth Zander and Evan Galloway (collectively, "Plaintiffs"),

ENTRY OF A JUDGMENT AND EXECUTION. landlord, or (2) possession remains with the tenant, i.e. "case dismissed!" If judgment is

NO. COA Filed: 15 November Easements- servient tenant s impermissible interference with dominant tenant s use-- motion to dismiss

l. This is an action to contest the decision of the Osceola County Value 2. The plaintiff, Katrina Scarborough, is the duly elected Osceola County

MINUTES OF THE CRANBURY TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD CRANBURY, NEW JERSEY MIDDLESEX COUNTY MINUTES OF AUGUST 16, 2012 APPROVED ON OCTOBER 18, 2012

Case 1:15-cv TWP-MJD Document 1 Filed 06/09/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

THE EVICTION ACTION. Bruce E. Gudin

/ 21 SEABRAN, LLC, STATE OF MAINE Cumberla'ld ss Clerk's Otne\u)ER ON PETITIONER'S RECEIVED

Case 2:17-cv JHS Document 1 Filed 03/15/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA COMPLAINT

New Brunswick, New Jersey March 1, 1976

1. This is an action to contest an ad valorem tax assessment for the tax year

In the Matter of the Application of the Township of Denville Docket No. MRS-L

By F. Clifford Gibbons, Esq. 1

Bowery Residents' Comm., Inc. v 127 W. 25th LLC 2011 NY Slip Op 33971(U) November 2, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /11

IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax DECISION

APPENDIX TO COMPLAINT. Exclusionary Zoning & Other Land Use Policies and Practices of Defendant Municipalities

BEFORE THE OIL AND GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF COLORADO APPLICATION

Client Alert. A Pennsylvania Commercial Lender s Guide to Collecting Debts in New Jersey

PIATT COUNTY BOARD OF REVIEW RULES & PROCEDURES 2013

1. The Plaintiff, LAKE V/ALES RETIREMENT CENTER, [NC., (hereinafter

COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DOCKET NO. COAH THE HILLS DEVELOPMENT CO., ) Plaintiff ) v. ) TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDS, ) Defendant, )

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA. Plaintiff, CASE NO. :

COMPLAINT. Introductory Statement. 1. This lawsuit arises from a new Providence zoning ordinance that prohibits more

UNDERSTANDING EVICTION (F.E.D.) ACTIONS

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE TAX COURT COMMITTEE ON OPINIONS TAX COURT OF NEW JERSEY. January 2, 2018

How to Sue Your Landlord in Texas

Transcription:

At / KLOvMl

AF000Q08C J. ^ >y f y, SCERBO. KOBIN, LITWIN & WOLFF 1O PARK PLACE MORRISTOWN, N. J. O796O (2O1) 538-422O ATTORNEYS FOR Plaintiffs BROWNING-FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF SOUTH JERSEY, INC., A Corporation of the State of New Jersey, RICHCRETE CONCRETE COMPANY, A corporation of the State of New Jersey and MID-STATE FILIGREE SYSTEMS, INC., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSE LAW DIVISION MIDDLESEX COUNTY Docket No. P.W. Civil Action COMPLAINT vs. CRANBURY TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD AND THE TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF TOWNSHIP OF CRANBURY, Defendants Plaintiffs, Browning Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc., a corporation of the State of New Jersey, (hereinafter "BFI"), Richcrete Concrete Company, a corporation of the State of New Jersey, (hereinafter "Richcrete") and Mid- State Filigree Systems, Inc., a corporation of the State of New Jersey OTGA id

are transferred including a percent of the road frontage equivalent to the percent of the total land retired through deed restriction. The Township Clerk shall keep a record of the total approved number of credits and the number authorized to be transferred. 7. The use of TDC in a the Zoning Ordinance is not authorized by law. Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment that the Zoning Ordinance and the Land Use Plan be declared null and void. Wherefore, plaintiffs demands judgment appointing a Master to prepare a new land use plan and a new zoning ordinance. action. Wherefore, plaintiffs demand judgment for counsel fees and costs of this THIRD COUNT 1. Plaintiff repeat the allegations of the Second Count as if set forth hereinafter at length. 2. The defendant Planning Board provided in the land use plan that the use of T.D.C. in the Zoning Ordinance would lead to approximately 1500 credits or 1500 units of a residential character. 3. The utilization of T.D.C. assisted the defendant, Township Committee, in meeting the obligations of South Burlington County JTwp. 92 N.J. 158(1983). 4. The use of T.D.C. in a zoning ordinance is not authorized by law. 5. Therefore, the Township Committee will be unable to meet the obligations of South Burlington County NAACP_jk_Mj J JLaurel Twp. 92 N.J. 158 r\

(1983). ( } WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment that the Zoning Ordinance and the Land Use Plan be declared null and void. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment appointing a master to prepare a new land use plan and new zoning ordinance. WHEREFORE, plaintiff demands judgment for counsel fees and costs of this action. FOURTH COUNT 1. Plaintiff repeat the allegations of the First,Second,and Third Counts of the Complaint as if set forth hereinafter at length. 2. The Planning Board's public notice of Master Plan hearings provided: Please take notice that the Planning Board of the Township of Cranbury will hold a Public Hearing on Thursday, July 8, 1982 at 8:00 p.m. at the Cranbury Elementary School. To be considered are revisions to the Master Plan and discussion adoption of a Farmland Preservation Program. Copies of the proposed documents will be available for review ten days prior to the meeting at the Cranbury Township Office and the Cranbury Public Library. Please take notice that the Planning Board of the Township of Cranbury will hold a public hearing on Thursday, July 29, 1982, at the Cranbury Elementary School. To be considered are revisions to the Master, Plan and discussion of adoption of a Farmland Preservation Program. Copies of the proposed documents are available for review at the Cranbury Township Office and the Cranbury Public Library. Please take notice that the continuation of the public hearing to consider an amended

element of the Land Use Plan of the Township of Cranbury and, specifically, a Farmland Preservation Plan has been rescheduled August 3, 1982, at the Cr anbury Elementary School at 8:00 p.m. At that time the Planning Board will also consider possible revisions to the plan specifically in the high density planned development, middle density village, industrial districts and for properties on Dey Road, south of Station Road and north of the proposed Old Trenton Road, Master Planned road in the agricultural district. The Board will consider any written material provided it is submitted before the public hearing. Maps and reports are available for review at the Cranbury Township office be- *,«, hours of 9-12 a.m. and 1-4 p.m. -- ^'""nhased at $10.00.. that it does not put resu!t of the adoption thereof. Constitution. Zoning.. A irnin. & WOLF ESQ.