Using the Real Estate Market to Establish Streetcar Catchment Areas Case Study of Multifamily Residential Rental Property in Tucson, Arizona

Similar documents
Arthur C. Nelson Robert Hibberd University of Arizona

Use of the Real Estate Market to Establish Light Rail Station Catchment Areas

Land Use Impacts of BRT

Roback 1982 joint hhld firm decisions re wages and rent

TRACKING AND EXPLAINING NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHANGE IN U.S. METROPOLITAN AREAS BETWEEN 1990 AND 2010, WITH SPECIAL ATTENTION TO GENTRIFICATION

6. Review of Property Value Impacts at Rapid Transit Stations and Lines

How Fair Market Rents Limit Voucher Households to Live in Better Neighborhoods: The Case of Baltimore Metropolitan Area

Estimating the Value of the Historical Designation Externality

THE EFFECT OF PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC TRANSIT ON PROPERTY VALUES

Portland Streetcar Development Impacts

TOOLS TO BALANCE SUPPLY. Rail~Volution October 22, 2013 Dan Bertolet VIA Architecture and Planning

vision42: The Value of Rail Transit Access to Residential Properties of Manhattan

D LONG REALTY COMPANY // // 1890 E RIVER RD, TUCSON, AZ //

SOUTH CHURCH TUCSON S PREMIER OFFICE TOWER

LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT AS A MAGNET FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: EVIDENCE FROM TWIN CITIES

Hedonic Pricing Model Open Space and Residential Property Values

Multifamily Housing Development Notice of Funding Availability

A Real-Option Based Dynamic Model to Simulate Real Estate Developer Behavior

DRAFT. Transit Oriented Development Design Guidelines. Introduction. Path Forward

Modeling Housing Affordability in Corpus Christi, Texas

UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPER S DECISION- MAKING IN THE REGION OF WATERLOO

METROPOLITAN COUNCIL S FORECASTS METHODOLOGY

Re-sales Analyses - Lansink and MPAC

EAST-WEST CORRIDOR EXISTING CONDITIONS

Place Type Descriptions Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan

Real Estate Market Analysis

The impact of Liverpool-Parramatta Transitway on housing price: a repeat sales approach

Northgate Mall s Effect on Surrounding Property Values

TEMPE REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY

Impacts of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) on Surrounding Residential Property Values

Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee

RESEARCH ON PROPERTY VALUES AND RAIL TRANSIT

Estimating User Accessibility Benefits with a Housing Sales Hedonic Model

Transit Villages: Success & Sustainability

An Investigation into the Potential Relationship between Property Values and High Voltage Overhead Transmission Lines in Ireland

IDENTIFYING THE IMPACTS OF LIGHT RAIL STATION LOCATION ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY VALUES IN THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO

PEACHTREE INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD small area study

The Florida Affordable Housing Suitability Model. Florida Housing Coalition State Conference Sept. 27, 2011

3.05 Acres of Residential Land FOR SALES INFORMATION: JOHN PHOENIX (OFFICE) (MOBILE)

Hennepin County Economic Analysis Executive Summary

Review of the Prices of Rents and Owner-occupied Houses in Japan

100% LEASED INVESTMENT

FOR SALE $1,300, NORTH ELSTON AVENUE CHICAGO, IL 60618

Implementing Centers: Assessing Community Development Opportunities and Barriers

5. PROPERTY VALUES. In this section, we focus on the economic impact that AMDimpaired

Right Sizing Parking for Sustainable Suburbs

Land Enhancement and Intensification Benefits of Investing in an Urban Rail Network Henry Le a, Lim Wee Liang b and Wai Yan Leong c

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

Divergent Pathways of Gentrification: Racial Inequality and the Social Order of Renewal in Chicago Neighborhoods

Journal of Babylon University/Engineering Sciences/ No.(5)/ Vol.(25): 2017

RESIDENTIAL MARKET & ECONOMIC OUTLOOK QUEENSLAND, BRISBANE & WEST END

Leasehold discount in dwelling prices: A neglected view to the challenges facing the leasehold institution

COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY

The Economic Impact of Proximity to Open Space on Single-Family Home Values in Washington County, Minnesota

Data and Methodology: Location Affordability Index Version 2.0

Introduction Public Housing Education Ethnicity, Segregation, Transactions. Neighborhood Change. Drivers and Effects.

MUTTART URBAN DISTRICT

Value Capture: An Overview Eric Rothman President HR&A Advisors, Inc. October 15, 2012

DETERMINING THE EFFECTS OF LAND CHARACTERISTICS ON FARMLAND VALUES IN SOUTH-CENTRAL IDAHO

Property Right Restriction and House Prices

A Quantitative Approach to Gentrification: Determinants of Gentrification in U.S. Cities,

Recommendations for COD Standards. Robert J. Gloudemans Almy, Gloudemans, Jacobs & Denne. for. New York State Office of Real Property Services

Thoroughfares and Apartment Values

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

Meeting of Group of Experts on CPI 30 May 1 June 2012

Estimating Commercial Land-Use Conversion: Case Study of Athens-Clarke County, Georgia

Housing Conservation District Advisory Group

Hedonic Modeling of Open Space in James City County

The Improved Net Rate Analysis

Available Listings By Tom Nieman. PICOR Commercial Real Estate Services

ESTIMATING THE IMPACT OF FORECLOSURES ON HOUSING PRICES IN ORLANDO, FLORIDA: A HEDONIC MODELING APPROACH

Condominium Conversions in. Determinants

Download Presentation

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

Sorting based on amenities and income

Central Corridor Forecasting Methodology

Affordability First: Concerns about Preserving Housing Options for Existing and New Residents on Atlanta s Westside

Applying Lessons from The 606 to Map Displacement Pressure in Chicago

School Quality and Property Values. In Greenville, South Carolina

B-11-MN April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

Effect of Public Housing on House Prices

Description of IHS Hedonic Data Set and Model Developed for PUMA Area Price Index

Metro Boston Perfect Fit Parking Initiative

Proving Depreciation

The rapidly rising price of single-family homes in. Change and Challenges East Austin's Affordable Housing Problem

Determinants of residential property valuation

POPULATION FORECASTS

City of San Antonio. Neighborhood Improvements Bond Program Development Community Committee Meeting. October 20, 2016

LAND USE AMENDMENT SPRINGBANK HILL (WARD 6) ELMONT DRIVE SW AND 69 STREET SW BYLAW 114D2017

Community Impact: The Effects of Assisted Rental Housing in Delaware

BUSI 331: Real Estate Investment Analysis and Advanced Income Appraisal

The effect of transport innovation on property prices: A study on the new commuter line between Uppsala and Älvsjö. Student: Brikena Meha

Real Estate Market Report

Kane County. Division of Transportation. Technical Specifications Manual for Road Improvement Impact Fees Under Kane County Ordinance #07-232

TOWNHOME COMMUNITY CARLISLE VILLAGE

Final Report. City of Arvada, Colorado. Vauxmont/Cimarron Park ODP

THE IMPACT OF A NEW SUBWAY LINE ON PROPERTY VALUES IN SANTIAGO

Marketing Package S Main Street Concord NH

Neighborhood Effects of Foreclosures on Detached Housing Sale Prices in Tokyo

Transcription:

Using the Real Estate Market to Establish Streetcar Catchment Areas Case Study of Multifamily Residential Rental Property in Tucson, Arizona Arthur C. Nelson Robert Hibberd University of Arizona

Outline A brief history of streetcars Fixed guideway transit and real estate values Literature review and research gap Tucson case study description Model Results Implications Page 2 TRB 2018

A brief history of streetcars 1820s-1880s horse-drawn omnibus 1860s-1890s steam and cable 1890s-present electric Streetcar suburbs 1950s onward cars = decline 2000s Revival of the Modern streetcar Page 3 TRB 2018

The (skimpy) Literature on Streetcars and Real Estate Value Markets should capitalize transit investment into rents and value Only one article includes streetcars: Transit and Real Estate Rents, Nelson, Transportation Research Record 2017 Using distance bands, prior research in Salt Lake County found price premium to 1.25 miles. Page 4 TRB 2018

Limitations Very wide distance bands 0 to <0.50 mile 0.50 to 1.0 mile No socioeconomic controls No centrality controls But otherwise a pretty good study Page 5 TRB 2018

Tucson Case Study SunLink launched July 2014 3.9-miles (6.3 km) 21 stations (both ways) Page 6 TRB 2018

Tucson SunLink Modern Streetcar Inaugurated July 2014 System is 3.9 miles (6.3 km) 21 stations (both directions) Connects medical center to main campus along commercial route to downtown and the west side redevelopment area Page 7 TRB 2018

Page 8 TRB 2018

Research Question Is there an association between apartment rents and proximity to streetcar stations? Page 9 TRB 2018

Model R i = f (B i, S i, L i ) where: R is the price of rent per square foot for property i; B is the set of building attributes of property i; S is the set of socioeconomic characteristics of the vicinity of property i; and L is a set of location attributes of property i comprise of distance to the CBD as well as distance to streetcar stations based on distance bands. Page 10 TRB 2018

Variable Dependent Variable Specification, Predicted Sign Data Source Asking rent per square foot Continuous, logged CoStar Building Attributes Average Unit Size in Square Feet Gross Leasable Square Feet Effective Year Built Student-Restricted Continuous - Continuous + Continuous + Binary (rent restriction is the referent) + CoStar CoStar CoStar CoStar Socioeconomic Characteristics Percent Not White Non-Hispanic Median Household Tract Income Location Distance to CBD, miles Experimental Variables Distance to Nearest CRT Station in One- Eighth Mile Increments to 1.50 miles Percent x 100 + Continuous x 1,000 + Continuous - Binary + American Community Survey 2015 American Community Survey 2015 GIS measure from parcel centroid to CBD centroid GIS measure from parcel centroid to station centroid Page 11 TRB 2018

Variable Coefficient p Constant -2.030 * Building Attributes Average Unit Size 0.000 * Gross Leasable Area 3.486E-007 * Year Built 0.001 * Student Restricted -0.113 * Socioeconomic Characteristics White Percent, Block Group 0.001 * Median HH Income, Block Group 3.874E-007 Location Distance CBD, miles -0.010 * Experimental Variables Streetcar < 0.125 mile 0.119 * Streetcar 0.125-0.250 mile 0.125 * Streetcar 0.250-0.375 mile 0.024 Streetcar 0.375-0.500 mile 0.093 * Streetcar 0.500-0.625 mile 0.038 * Streetcar 0.625-0.750 mile 0.026 Streetcar 0.750-0.875 mile -0.032 Streetcar 0.875-1.000 mile -0.028 Streetcar 1.000-1.125 mile 0.006 Streetcar 1.125-1.250 mile -0.002 Performance Cases 574 Adjusted R2 0.352 F-ratio 19.27 * * p < 0.10 Page 12 TRB 2018 Results

Distance Band Square Foot Rent Increment Distance Band Results 0.15 0.1 0.05 0 SCT-0.125 SCT-0.250 SCT-0.375* SCT-0.500 SCT-0.625 Distance Band Page 13 TRB 2018

Implications There may be fundamentally different market responses between LRT and streetcar systems. Tucson streetcar system is very new so the full extent of market responsiveness to the streetcar may be years away. There are many physical barriers limiting access of rental housing to streetcar stations especially across Speedway. Full market responsiveness may be inhibited by existing detached residential neighborhoods and planning restrictions preventing the market from building more multifamily structures farther away. Page 14 TRB 2018

Future Research Extend to office, retail and other land uses. Expand methodology to other streetcar systems. Investigate change in value with respect to streetcar proximity over time. Page 15 TRB 2018