Contents. Figures: Tables:

Similar documents
Glenmont Sector Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS

Glenmont Sector Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS

Planning Board Worksession No.4: Parklawn South District and Randolph Hills District

White Oak Science Gateway Master Plan Staff Draft AFFORDABLE HOUSING ANALYSIS. March 8, 2013

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RENTAL HOUSING STUDY. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT June 2016

MONROE COUNTY HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT

New affordable housing production hits record low in 2014

Multifamily Market Commentary February 2017

Multifamily Market Commentary December 2018

City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents

San Francisco HOUSING INVENTORY

Monthly Indicators % + 3.9% % 2 New Listings. 3 Pending Sales. 4 5 Days on Market Until Sale. 6 7 Average Sales Price

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

Housing Indicators in Tennessee

Monthly Indicators. October Monthly Snapshot % + 9.0% %

Multifamily Market Commentary February 2019

Planning Board Work Session #2 June 7, 2018

Housing Affordability in Lexington, Kentucky

MPDU Law Update 9/10/2018 1

LOCAL LAW A Local Law amending Chapter 62 (Affordable Housing) of the Village of Ossining Code.

Definitions & Data on Rent Stabilization in New York City

Appendix D HOUSING WORK GROUP REPORT JULY 10, 2002

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development.

AN ECONOMIC, FISCAL AND CAPITAL ASSET IMPACT ANALYSIS OF THIRTEEN PROPOSED NEW DEVELOPMENTS ON THE TOWN OF DENTON, MARYLAND.

Date: January 9, Strategic Housing Committee. IZ Work Group. Legacy Homes Program

/'J (Peter Noonan, Rent Stabilization and Housing, Manager)VW

Ann Arbor Downtown Market Scan

CHAPTER 7 HOUSING. Housing May

Downtown Housing Policy

Post-Katrina housing affordability challenges continue in 2008, worsening among Orleans Parish very low income renters

Multifamily Market Commentary February 2018

Monthly Indicators % % - 6.0% Activity Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales. Days on Market Until Sale. Median Sales Price

MARKET WATCH: Dakota County

bae urban economics ALAMEDA RENT STUDY Presentation to Alameda City Council November 4, 2015

Residential Capacity Estimate

ORDINANCE NO

America s Rental Housing

Monthly Indicators + 3.5% + 3.0% % Activity Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales. Days on Market Until Sale. Median Sales Price

Subsidized. Housing. in 2017

Comprehensive Plan York, Maine HOUSING

INCENTIVE POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

MARKET WATCH: Twin Cities Trends in the unsubsidized multifamily rental market

Addressing the Impact of Housing for Virginia s Economy

Monthly Indicators % % % Market Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales Median Sales Price

5 RENTAL AFFORDABILITY

Fannie Mae Affordable Lender Meeting

Trulia s Rent vs. Buy Report: Full Methodology

City of Salinas Nexus Studies Overview and Summary February 2016

Policy Brief Achievable Local Housing

AFFORDABLE ATLANTA. Presented By: Presented For: ULI Atlanta: LCC Working Group on Affordable Housing 1/16/18

Affordable Housing Bonus Program. Public Questions and Answers - #2. January 26, 2016

Monthly Indicators % % - 5.3% Activity Overview New Listings Pending Sales. Closed Sales. Days on Market Until Sale. Median Sales Price

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

2013 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Metro Indianapolis Report

CITY OF SAN MATEO BELOW MARKET RATE (INCLUSIONARY) PROGRAM

MPDU Ordinance Traditional Neighborhood Housing Program

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases One Year Report

Town of Limon Comprehensive Plan CHAPTER 4 HOUSING. Limon Housing Authority Affordable Housing

Rental Housing: Poised for a Return to Growth

STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE STATE COMPTROLLER 110 STATE STREET ALBANY, NEW YORK 12236

Detroit Inclusionary Housing Plan & Market Study Preliminary Inclusionary Housing Feasibility Study Executive Summary August, 2016

City of Exeter Housing Element

Summit County Workforce Housing Needs. June 2013

SUPPLEMENTAL SUBJECT: WINCHESTER AND SANTANA ROW/VALLEY FAIR URBAN VILLAGE PLAN BASELINE AFFORDABLE HOUSING STOCK ANALYSIS

ARTICLE 101 Workforce Housing Regulation

Modeling Housing Affordability in Corpus Christi, Texas

American Canyon Affordable Housing Nexus Study: Background Report

Affordable Rental Housing in Chapel Hill Challenges and Opportunities. Presented to Mayor s Affordable Housing Task Force June 6, 2013

The State of Renters & Their Homes

Monthly Indicators. November Monthly Snapshot % % %

HOUSING ELEMENT Inventory Analysis

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

Affordably- Priced Housing

Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE

Phase I Assured Housing Feasibility Analysis for the City of Moab and Grand County, Utah. bae urban economics. March 2018

Status of HUD-Insured (or Held) Multifamily Rental Housing in Final Report. Executive Summary. Contract: HC-5964 Task Order #7

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND REDEVELOPMENT STRATEGY FOR THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT

housing element of the general plan Approved and Adopted April 2011

State of Renters and Their Homes

The rapidly rising price of single-family homes in. Change and Challenges East Austin's Affordable Housing Problem

City of San José. Produced by City of San José Department of Housing. Housing Market Update. First Quarter 2018

The number of people alive today is greater than the number of people who have ever died.

HUMAN ACTIVITY IV. RESIDENTIAL PATTERN AND HOUSING RESIDENTIAL PATTERN

Virginia Out of Reach A Report Released by the Virginia Housing Alliance in collaboration with The National Low Income Housing Coalition

TOWN OF HALIFAX, MASSACHUSETTS HOUSING PRODUCTION PLAN

Key Findings on the Affordability of Rental Housing from New York City s Housing and Vacancy Survey 2008

2015 New York City. Housing Security Profile and Affordable Housing Gap Analysis

DRAFT Inclusionary Housing Survey. Prepared for San Francisco s Technical Advisory Committee

Multifamily Challenges and Opportunities in Middle Appalachia

Changes in the New DHCD Comprehensive Permit Guidelines Prepared by CHAPA April 14, 2008

San Francisco Planning Department April 2008

Proposed Vancouver Affordable Housing Fund

3,300 SF RETAIL SPACE AVAILABLE ROCKVILLE, MD

500 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q1-2015

Analysis of Condo Converted Properties in Minneapolis

B-11-MN April 1, 2015 thru June 30, 2015 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

July 1, 2014 thru September 30, 2014 Performance Report

Multifamily Housing For All: The Need for Affordable Housing. Solutions for an Affordable Pittsburgh

AFFORDABLE HOUSING. City of Santa Ana

Transcription:

Housing Appendix

Contents Grosvenor-Strathmore Housing Conditions... 2 Townhomes and Condominiums... 3 Cost Burdening... 3 Multifamily Homes... 3 Affordable al Housing Methodology... 6 Affordable Housing Definitions:... 8 Figures: Figure 1. Effective Growth Tables: Table 1. Cost Burdening Table 2. Grosvenor Strathmore Current Units Table 3. Grosvenor Strathmore Current Conditions (2015) Table 4. Grosvenor Strathmore Affordability Conditions Table 5. 2015 Income Limits Table 6. Household-Size Distribution by Number of Bedrooms Table 7. Income Limits by Number of Bedrooms Table 8. Affordable Limits at 30 Percent of Income Table 9. Affordable Limits at 25 Percent of Income 1

Grosvenor-Strathmore Housing Conditions The Grosvenor-Strathmore Metro area has a variety of townhomes, condominiums, and multi-family housing. Cost Burdening Cost burdening is defined as spending more than 30 percent of household income on housing costs (defined as contract rent and utilities). Compared to Montgomery County, renters in Grosvenor- Strathmore are less likely to be cost burdened and severely cost burdened (spending more than 50 percent of household income on housing costs). In the Grosvenor-Strathmore Metro Area Minor Master Plan, 33 percent of households are classified as cost burdened, compared to Montgomery County, in which 49 percent of households are classified as cost burdened. Only 9 percent of households in Grosvenor-Strathmore are considered severely cost burdened, compared to 23 percent for Montgomery County wide. Table 1. Cost Burdening GROSS RENT AS A PERCENT OF HOUESHOLD INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS Grosvenor Strathmore Percent Montgomery County Percent Total: 855 100% 123,581 100% Less than 10.0% 16 2% 2,752 2% 10.0 to 14.9% 102 12% 7,742 6% 15.0 to 19.9% 176 21% 15,085 12% 20.0 to 24.9% 156 18% 16,963 14% 25.0 to 29.9% 94 11% 15,213 12% 30.0 to 34.9% 129 15% 12,498 10% 35.0 to 39.9% 44 5% 8,847 7% 40.0 to 49.9% 31 4% 11,335 9% 50.0% (Severely Cost Burdened) 80 9% 28,119 23% Total Households Cost 284 33% 60,799 49% Burdened (>30%) Not computed 27 3% 5,027 4% Source: 2011-2015 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates Townhomes and Condominiums The Plan area contains 232 townhomes and 274 condominiums. There are 112 townhomes in Symphony Park, located to the north of the Music Center at Strathmore. Stoneybrook has 120 townhomes, located to the east of Tuckerman Lane. Parkside and Strathmore Park are both located east of Tuckerman Lane, and contain 60 and 212 units, respectively. 2

Multifamily Homes Grosvenor-Strathmore has two multi-family rental structures with a total of 787 units, of which 54 percent are 1-bedroom units, 41 percent are 2-bedroom units, 4 percent are efficiency units, and 2 percent are 3-bedroom units. Of the 787 multi-family units in the Grosvenor-Strathmore area, 88 (or 11 percent) are rent-restricted in the MPDU program. Although both buildings in the Grosvenor-Strathmore Metro Area Minor Master Plan area were completed after the adoption of the MPDU law that set a minimum of 12.5 percent affordable housing, the Meridian at Grosvenor Station building has less than 8 percent of its units set aside in the MPDU program, most likely due to a buyout program. The Avalon at Grosvenor Station has around 13 percent of its housing stock in the MPDU program. Table 2. Grosvenor Strathmore Current Units Name Efficiencies 1- Bedrooms 2- Bedrooms 3- Bedrooms - Restricted Total Units Meridian at Grosvenor Station 30 163 106 0 23 299 Avalon At Grosvenor Station 0 260 215 13 65 488 Total 30 423 321 13 88 787 Percent 4% 54% 41% 2% 11% 100% Source: DHCA Survey, CoStar Grosvenor-Strathmore s two multi-family buildings were both built less than twenty years ago; the Avalon at Grosvenor, a garden style building, was built fourteen years ago, and the Meridian at Grosvenor Station, a high-rise, was built eight years ago. In 2015, both buildings had low vacancies at around 2-3 percent, respectively, and a concession rate of 0 percent. The effective rent per unit at the Meridian at Grosvenor Station is $1,916, and the effective rent per square is $2.08. At the Avalon at Grosvenor Station, the effective rent per unit is $1,886 and the effective rent per square foot is $1.91. Table 3. Grosvenor Strathmore Current Conditions (2015) Name City Structure Type Building Age Vacancy Percent Effective Concessions Effective Per Unit Effective Per SF Meridian at Grosvenor Station Avalon At Grosvenor Station Source: DHCA Survey, CoStar Rockville High-Rise 2008 2.6% 0.0% $1,916 $2.08 Rockville Garden 2002 1.9% 0.0% $1,886 $1.91 3

Figure 1. Effective Growth $2.10 $2.00 $1.90 $1.80 $1.70 $1.60 $1.50 Source: CoStar Grosvenor-Strathmore Effective Growth/Yr 2007-2015 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 The effective rent growth per year for both facilities in Grosvenor-Strathmore grew an average of 2 percent from 2007 to 2015, suggesting modest growth that slightly outpaced inflation, which averaged 1.8 percent during the same time. Table 4. Grosvenor Strathmore Affordability Conditions Name Efficiencies Average AMI 1- Bedroom Average AMI 2- Bedroom Average Meridian At Grosvenor Station AMI 3-Bedroom Average AMI $1,395 89% $1,678 96% $2,215 117% - - Avalon At Grosvenor Station - - $1,581 90% $1,971 104% $2,952 129% *Affordability was calculated using 25% of AMI due to utilities not being included Source: 2015 CoStar s Grosvenor-Strathmore has units that range in affordability from 89 percent of area median income (AMI) to 129 percent of AMI. Affordability is greatest in smaller units, with efficiencies and 1-bedroom units affordable to households earning under 100 percent of AMI (89 percent 96 percent, with a suggested income of around $67,000 - $80,000), and larger family-sized 2 and 3-bedroom units affordable to households earning over 100 percent of AMI (104 percent 129 percent, with a suggested income of around $76,000 - $142,000). The Plan area has no units that are considered market rate affordable. 4

Affordable al Housing Methodology To determine affordability, households are first categorized by their income and household size relative to the AMI. AMI is adjusted for household size. Low-to-moderate income households are those earning up to 65 percent of AMI. The income limits in the table below are based on income requirements for Montgomery County s moderately priced dwelling unit (MPDU) program and US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) standards. Table 5. 2015 Income Limits Household Size 65% AMI 80% AMI (Market Affordable Rate) 100% AMI (Median) 120% AMI 1 $48,660 $61,120 $76,400 $91,680 2 $56,810 $69,920 $87,400 $104,880 3 $63,895 $78,640 $98,300 $117,960 4 $70,980 $87,360 $109,200 $131,040 5 $76,635 $94,320 $117,900 $141,480 Source: 2015 Montgomery County DHCA, HUD Second, rather than just count the number of households, we need to count the number of rental units affordable to households to understand the inventory of low-cost housing. We, therefore, need to develop an assumption about the number of bedrooms that households of different sizes need. These assumptions also apply to households of the same size that may have different needs based on household composition, for example two unrelated adults would typically need two bedrooms, while a married couple would need one. The following table provides the Planning Department s standard assumptions regarding the distribution of household sizes by number of bedrooms. Table 6. Household-Size Distribution by Number of Bedrooms Number of Bedrooms Household Size Efficiency 1 2 3 4 1 100% 30% 2 70% 10% 3 60% 20% 4 30% 50% 40% 5 30% 60% Third, based on the previous two tables of household income limits and our assumptions about the distribution of household sizes by the number of bedrooms, we estimate income limits by number of bedroom rooms. This calculation is a weighted average of household-income limits for each bedroom 5

size. For example, for one-bedrooms occupied by households up to 65 percent of AMI, the maximum weighted income is 0.3 x $48,660 + 0.7 x $56,810 = $ 54,665 Table 7. Income Limits by Number of Bedrooms # of Bedrooms 65% AMI 80% 100% AMI 120% AMI (Market Affordable Rate) 0 $48,685 $61,120 $74,900 $89,880 1 $54,665 $69,920 $84,100 $100,920 2 $58,923 $78,640 $90,650 $108,780 3 $71,260 $87,360 $109,630 $131,556 4 $74,373 $94,320 $114,420 $137,304 Source: Montgomery County Department of Planning Affordable Housing Methodology Fourth, affordable housing is defined as housing that costs no more than 25 percent of household income, if utilities are not included, or 30 percent of household income if utilities are included. 1 All facilities in Grosvenor-Strathmore have utilities included. This definition is similar to the rent requirement for MPDUs set by the County Department of Housing and Community Affairs (DHCA). The maximum affordable rent by number of bedrooms is listed below. Table 8. Affordable Limits at 30 Percent of Income # of Bedrooms 65% AMI 80% AMI 100% AMI 120% AMI 0 $1,217 $1,528 $1,873 $2,247 1 $1,367 $1,748 $2,103 $2,523 2 $1,473 $1,966 $2,266 $2,720 3 $1,781 $2,184 $2,741 $3,289 4 $1,859 $2,358 $2,861 $3,433 Source: Montgomery County Department of Planning Affordable Housing Methodology 1 Housing and Urban Development, Affordable Housing http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/hud?src=/program_offices/comm_planning/affordablehousing/ 6

Table 9. Affordable Limits at 25 Percent of Income # of Bedrooms 65% AMI 80% AMI 100% AMI 120% AMI 0 $1,014 $1,273 $1,560 $1,873 1 $1,139 $1,457 $1,752 $2,103 2 $1,228 $1,638 $1,889 $2,266 3 $1,485 $1,820 $2,284 $2,741 4 $1,549 $1,965 $2,384 $2,861 Source: Montgomery County Department of Planning Affordable Housing Methodology Affordable Housing Definitions: Income Restricted Affordable Housing: A Moderately Priced Dwelling Unit (MPDU) or a dwelling unit built under government regulation or binding agreement requiring the unit be affordable to households at or below the income eligibility for the MPDU program. Income Restricted Workforce Housing: Defined in Chapter 25B as housing that is affordable to households at or below 120% area median income (AMI). When a master plan refers to Workforce Housing as a part of its affordable housing goals or requirements, incomes are limited to 100% of AMI. Market Rate Affordable Housing. There is no definition in code or elsewhere. The term is used to describe rents that occur in the market place and not subject to government rules or requirements (and therefore not income-restricted). Market rate affordable dwelling units are affordable to households earning no more than 80% of area median income, adjusted as MPDUs for household and unit size, and must not exceed the median rent for the planning area. Restricted Affordable Housing: This term is not currently defined in County code or commonly used, but appears to be the best term to describe housing where rent increases will be limited and there is no income test for the tenant. The preservation of market rate affordable housing may require an agreement that both establishes the baseline rent (priced to be affordable at 80% of AMI) and rent restrictions (such as requiring that rents increase by only the Voluntary Guideline.) 7