Project NH 0018(179)402 PCN 036L Hutchinson and Turner County. US18 From US81 to SD19. Grading, Structure (Bridge), and Interim Surfacing

Similar documents
PROJECT: P 0037(129)207 PCN: 039K BROWN COUNTY. S.D. Highway 37 From Aspen Ave to U.S. Highway 12 in Groton

PROJECTS: P 0083(74)56; 036E; JONES COUNTY NH 0083(79)45; 04E7; MELLETTE COUNTY NH 0083(80)44; 04E8; MELLETTE COUNTY

PROJECT NH 0050(99)381 PCN 6926 YANKTON COUNTY. SD HWY 50 (4 th Street) from Broadway Ave to Archery Road in Yankton, SD

PROJECT NH 0212(165)224 PCN 039L POTTER COUNTY. US212 - Through Gettysburg

INFORMATIONAL HANDOUT

MINNEHAHA COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT HIGHWAY ACCESS APPLICATION & PERMIT

DRIVEWAY/ACCESS PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS Douglas County Trunk Highways

1.1 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to summarize guidance on those requirements generally applicable to grant programs.

Welcome to the Location Public Hearing for Highway 89 Improvements

Hank's Exchange Road Bridge Replacement Project

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING JULY 19, 2017 HOLYOKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE KITTREDGE CENTER HOLYOKE, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

TECHNICAL PRESENTATION Project History and Description of the Proposed Improvements Perry Steger, Steger & Bizzell Engineering, Inc.

MAYHILL ROAD WIDENING AND IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT - PUBLIC MEETING December 15, 2010 COMMENT CARD QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS

CITY OF FORT COLLINS NATURAL AREAS AND CONSERVED LANDS EASEMENT POLICY

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING

OAKGREEN AVENUE. Project Goals. (County Road 65) Corridor Improvement Project. Turn lanes Resurfacing Stormwater management

Brief Summary of Drainage Law. November 2011

Draft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance

MINUTE ORDER BONNER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES AUGUST 6, 2015

People, Property and Power Lines. Frequently asked questions about power lines on or near your property

Evaluating and Processing Road and Utility Easement Proposals on Corps Lands and Flowage Easements

Locally Administered Projects Overview

FM 1626 Public Hearing - January 14, 2016

Ohio Township Association

BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP EMMET COUNTY, MICHIGAN. PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE Ordinance No. 11A-99. (to replace prior Private Road Ordinance No.

CHAPTER 9 RIGHT OF WAY

CHAPTER 3: IDENTIFYING SECTION 4(f) PROPERTIES

Attached is a Clinton Township Zoning Permit Application and requirements for issuance of a permit.

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING MAY 18, 2017 GROVELAND TOWN HALL GROVELAND, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00PM FOR THE PROPOSED

County Engineers Workshop February 4, Little River Casino and Resort Manistee, Michigan

GUIDELINES. RESIDENTIAL ENTRANCES To COUNTY ROADS

M-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE

PUBLIC HEARING FM 2499 Section 4

Section 4(f) Why don t we build the road through this green space over here?

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 12, 2017 TOWN HALL SULLIVAN MEETING ROOM 558 SOUTH MAIN STREET RAYNHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Region 2, USDA Forest Service

APPLICATION FOR DRIVEWAY PERMIT

MINUTE ORDER. BONNER COUNTY PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES APRIL 7, 2016

SANILAC COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION ROAD POLICIES. A. Drainage, Base and Grade Construction (NON BITUMINOUS)

SECTION 7000 LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS

Frequently Asked Questions From the Certification of R/W Training Sessions

3. Will there be any amenities provided for the apartment or townhouse area, such as play areas or trails?

SPRING BROOK TOWNSHIP 966 STATE ROUTE 307 SPRING BROOK TOWNSHIP, PA PHONE (570) FAX (570)

TOWN OF NORTHWOOD, NEW HAMPSHIRE

SAULT STE. MARIE NORTH PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION FOR A CONSENT TO CREATE NEW LOTS

State, County, or Municipal Agency or instrumentality thereof, applying for authorization

PUBLIC HEARING. Loop 88 Segment 3 Thursday, October 12, 2017 Lubbock-Cooper Performing Arts Center at 6:00p.m. Date. Footer Text

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING JULY 7, 2016 CITY COUNCIL HEARING ROOM, FIRST FLOOR ONE GOVERNMENT CENTER FALL RIVER, MASSACHUSETTS 6:30 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

TOWN OF BRISTOL. Ontario County, New York APPLICATION FOR LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT

CEDAR COUNTY SECONDARY ROAD DEPARTMENT POLICY FOR UPGRADE OF LEVEL B COUNTY ROADS

-MENDOCINO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES- DIVISION OF LAND REGULATIONS TITLE 17

Walton County Planning and Development Services

Answers to Chatham Residents Questions about the Western Wake Partners

PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA Gregg Manor Road - From Hill Lane to US 290 Travis County, Texas

Upper Bern Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania Street Occupancy Permit Application

BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR THURSTON COUNTY

A B. C Submission. Subdivision Application under The Planning Act C.C.S.M. c. P80

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY DISPOSAL FEE OWNERSHIP OF YELLOW CREEK INDUSTRIAL PARK PROPERTIES

Public Facilities and Finance Element

Site Development Review for

SITE PLAN REVIEW ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW. Please Note: Once submitted to the County, all application materials become a matter of public record.

I-820 / SH 121 INTERCHANGE IN NE TARRANT COUNTY

610 LAND DIVISIONS AND PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENTS OUTSIDE A UGB

CONSENT APPLICATION GUIDE

Floodplain Development Land Use Review

APPLICATION PROCEDURE

Wells County Area Plan Commission Requirements for a Wind Energy Conversion System (WECS) Testing Facility or Communication Tower Development Plan

Plan Presentation Guide SECTION 60. Chapter 3 RIGHT-OF-WAY SECTION PRESENTATION

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 9, ABIGAIL ADAMS MIDDLE SCHOOL Auditorium WEYMOUTH, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

Application for Validation Order

ROAD USE AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF (WIND FARM NAME) WIND FARM

ZONING VARIANCES - ADMINISTRATIVE

MAJOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PROCESS GUIDE

SKETCH PLAN REVIEW SPECIAL EXCEPTION, SPECIAL REVIEW,

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 28, 2018 KENNEDY MIDDLE SCHOOL, AUDITORIUM SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS 6:30 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

LINCOLN COUNTY COUNTY ROAD STANDARDS AND ROAD POLICY

Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Santa Fe National Forest P.O. Box 3307 Española NM 87533

For Office Use Only. Permit No. Fee: $ $ per proposed lot (AN ADDITIONAL 10% CODE COMPLIANCE FEE WILL BE CHARGED)

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Department proposes to amend 25 CFR 151

SECTION 4(F) & CHAPTER 26. TxDOT Environmental Conference 2017

Right-of-Way and Easements for Electric Facility Construction

TOWN OF ROME 1156 ALPINE DR. NEKOOSA, WI (715)

TOWNSHIP OF BORDENTOWN LAND DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CHECKLIST. General Requirements for all Applications

Chapter 46 STREETS, SIDEWALKS AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES*

CHESTERFIELD COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Page 1 of 3 AGENDA. Meeting Date: November 18, Item Number: 8.D.5. Subject: Summary of Information:

LABEL PLEASE NOTE: ALL APPLICATIONS AND SITE PLANS MUST BE COMPLETED IN BLACK OR BLUE INK ONLY Intake by:

PLANNING BOARD MEETING MINUTES APRIL 4, 2002

Right of Way Acquisition

Department of Planning Services Division of Planning SARAH E. KEIFER, AICP Phone: 302/ Director of Planning Services FAX: 302/

DATE. 1. Owners Name. A. Complete Address. B. Directions if Rural Route or Box Number. C. Other Address. D. If Corporation, Name of President.

Understanding the Conditional Use Process

Easements, Establishments, Abandonments and Vacations

instructions for consent application

MINOR BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PROCESS GUIDE

STAFF REPORT FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT CDP# STANDARD PERMIT June 11, 2013 CPA-1. Victor Suarez Fern Drive Mendocino, CA 95460

ORDINANCE NO. 41. PRIVATE ROAD ORDINANCE As Amended Through April 10, 2008

CHAPTER 14: DRIVEWAYS, TOWN HIGHWAYS, AND PRIVATE ROADS

5. That the Owner shall agree that all development Blocks shown within the Draft Plan will be connected to full municipal services.

1. Roll Call. 2. Minutes a. September 24, 2018 Special Joint Meeting with Clay County Planning Commission. 3. Adoption of the Agenda

Transcription:

Public Meeting/ Open House 2/12/2015 Project NH 0018(179)402 PCN 036L Hutchinson and Turner County US18 From US81 to SD19 Grading, Structure (Bridge), and Interim Surfacing The South Dakota Department of Transportation provides services without regard to race, color, gender, religion, national origin, age or disability, according to the provisions contained in SDCL 20-13, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Executive Order 12898, Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 1994. Any person who has questions concerning this policy or who believes they have been discriminated against should contact the Department s Civil Rights Office at 605-773-3540.

US Highway 18 From US81 to SD19 Hutchinson & Turner County P 0018(179)402 PCN 036L Karen Olson, PE Road Design Engineering Supervisor Involve You, the Traveling Public Discuss concerns, Exchange ideas Project Overview Background Information Proposed Project February 12, 2015 North Grading and Structures in 1927 and 1938 Resurfaced in 1999 Turkey Ridge Turkey Ridge Chip Seal in 2009 US81 SD19 2014 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) = 848 2039 Projected ADT = 950 10.5% Average Truck Traffic 3 Year Period from 2011 to 2013: 17 Reported Crashes 9Animal Hit 3 Fixed Object Off Road 3 Angle-Intersection 1 Rear End 1 Other 0 Fatalities Weighted Crash Rate = 1.43 Statewide Weighted Crash Rate Average = 1.56 (Rural Principal Arterial) 1

Vertical Curves Narrow Shoulders 2 ft Surfacing Structures Replace Structure over Turkey Ridge Creek Widen Roadway 6 ft Shoulders Replace Fence and Culverts Interim Surfacing (Final Surfacing planned 2019) Proposed Project To provide safe, efficient access to streets and highways Limit number of direct accesses to major roadways Existing Width - 100 ft Purchase additional ROW totaling 150 ft corridor < 150 ft through Turkey Ridge and near houses Permanent Easements Temporary Easements Private property, such as signs, buildings or private utilities located within the public ROW Federal Highway Regulations Safety Owners of encroachments will be contacted by Yankton Area Personnel 2

Some of the existing utilities may need to relocate Utility Companies may negotiate easements with landowners as needed Utility Companies: Western Area Power Administration Northwestern Energy Century Link Southeastern Electric Wide Open West (WOW) Golden West Communications Fort Randall Telephone Midcontinent Communications TM Rural Water B-Y Rural Water Any Known Private Utilities Contact SDDOT Waterlines Drainfields Septic Tanks Underground Storage Tanks Underground Power Lines The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires that federally funded projects be reviewed to determine the social, economic, and environmental consequences of the action. Public involvement is beneficial to the implementation of a project s NEPA process. This project is being developed in accordance with applicable State & Federal environmental regulations. Your input on the following will aid in the project s development and NEPA review. Section 4(f) Property The project was reviewed to determine potential impacts to Section 4(f) properties, i.e. publicly owned parks, recreational areas, wildlife & waterfowl refuges, or public & private historical sites. No Section 4(f) properties have been identified along the project. Section 106 Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires Federal actions to take into account the effects of project undertakings on historic properties. No historic properties were identified during a cultural resources survey of the project. The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has concurred in a Section 106 determination of No Historic Properties Affected for this project. Contaminated Materials No contaminated materials have been identified along the project, to date. If you have information on contaminated materials, or underground/above ground storage tanks that could be encountered during construction, please let us know. Threatened & Endangered Species The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service will review the project to determine if it will impact the following species that are knowntooccurinhutchinsonandturner Counties: Birds: Whooping Crane, Rufa Red Knot Mammals: Northern Long eared Bat Fish: Topeka Shiners Plants: Western Prairie Fringed Orchid Wetlands Federal regulations require that unavoidable wetland impacts caused by highway construction be mitigated. Approximately 5.74 acres of wetlands may be impacted by the project. If you are interested in creating or restoring wetlands on your property, please complete the Wetland Mitigation Registry Form in the handouts. 3

SD44 Road will be closed to through traffic during construction Local traffic and emergency vehicle access will be maintained at all times Detour routes for highway US 18 traffic during construction US81 US18 Turkey Ridge SD19 SD46 Summer 2015 Held with individual landowners Driveway location / widths Fence Drainage Trees Landowners will be contacted by SDDOT to schedule an appointment Landowner Meetings Summer 2015 Final Design 2016 ROW Acquisition Process 2017 Construction 2018 Estimated Cost: $19.8 million Final Surfacing is planned for 2019 Olivet Turkey Ridge Davis Please Submit Questions or Comments by February 26, 2015 to: US18 US81 SD19 Future Grading and Asphalt Concrete Surfacing Grading, Structure, and Interim Surfacing in 2018 Shoulder Widening, Str. Replacement, and Pipe Repair in 2017 Asphalt Concrete Surfacing in 2019 I29 Karen.Olson@state.sd.us South Dakota Department of Transportation 700 East Broadway Avenue Pierre, SD 57501 Public Meeting Information http://sddot.com/dot/publicmeetings/default.aspx 4

Access Management South Dakota s Commitment to Safety and Smart Investment Decisions in Transportation What is Access Management? Access Management is the process of providing highway entrances only at locations where they can be provided safely and efficiently. Consider that each access point added to an undivided highway in an urban or suburban area increases the annual accident rate by 11 to 18 percent on that highway segment. In rural areas, each added access point increases the annual accident rate by 7 percent. Overall, drivewayaccess accidents alone cost South Dakota approximately $36.5 million each year. Each additional access point also contributes to congestion. The more driveways on a street the more places where people are slowing, changing lanes and turning. A five-lane street can quickly become a parking lot when there are many driveways in each block. When that happens, our valuable transportation investments are wasted and access to adjacent businesses is restricted. Controlled access facilities are segments of highway where either no access or only limited access to the highway is allowed. Interstate highways are an example of controlled access facilities where no access to the highway is allowed. Good access depends on the following: Limiting the number of conflict points (places where there is a potential for crashes) Separating conflict areas Reducing interference with through traffic Providing good on-site circulation and storage Properly spaced traffic signals How does Access Management affect businesses? Studies have shown that access management can provide three benefits to businesses adjacent to highways: Making sure that drivers can get in and out of businesses without being blocked by other traffic Making the highway more attractive by reducing congestion Extending the business effective service area by reducing travel times These benefits come not from having many driveways, but by having well-planned, well-located, high-capacity access points on the highway. Even skeptical business owners have found that proper access management results in an improved business climate, as customers can easily get in and out of their business establishment. For more information on Access Management, contact: Brooke White, SDDOT Access Management Engineer, 5316 W. 60 th St. Sioux Falls, SD 57107, Phone: 605-367-4970 Ext. 2120; E-Mail: Brooke.White@state.sd.us

Right of Way Information Individual Landowner Meetings: During the early stages of the project s design, SDDOT will schedule a meeting with individual landowners having property adjacent to the project. See the following page for an explanation of the landowner meeting. Property Acquisition Offer: After the project construction plans have been prepared and the right of way limits have been established, you will be contacted by an appraiser or negotiations agent to visit with you for that portion of your property that is needed for construction of the project. Your property will be valued and a written offer presented to you by a negotiating agent who will contact you for an appointment to make the written offer. Relocation Assistance Program: This program provides a variety of services and payments to owners and tenants who have personal property affected by the right of way being acquired for the project. Relocation payments are in addition to payments made for the real property being acquired. To preserve your eligibility for payments, do not move property until you have received a written relocation offer or have contacted Andrew J. Andy Jackson of the SDDOT Right of Way Program in Rapid City. His phone number is 605-394-1626. Anyone not satisfied with the relocation offer made to them may appeal using the procedures described in the Relocation Brochure. The landowner may be reimbursed for various fair and reasonable incidental expenses that may be incurred during the transfer of property to the State depending on impacts to personal property and qualifications. Right of Way Information Brochures: Two brochures Better Roads Brochure and Relocation Assistance Brochure have been prepared which explain the SDDOT s Right of Way process. They provide information on your rights regarding the acquisition of your property and the benefits available to you with regard to the Relocation Assistance Program. These brochures are available at this meeting on the Sign-in table. Please feel free to take a copy of each with you. These brochures are available at the following SDDOT website: http://www.sddot.com/resources/brochures/

Encroachments in ROW Federal Regulations (CFR 23.1) require that the State Highway Department (SDDOT) shall be responsible for preserving such ROW free of all public and private installation, facilities, and encroachments. No improvements shall be allowed to remain in the ROW unless they are deemed in the best interest of the pubic and will not impair the highway or interfere with the free and safe flow of traffic. Encroachments are any private property or improvement in the public ROW that is not approved by permit such as: Landscaping Items Fence Signs Buildings Etc. SDDOT Staff will survey the project limits to identify all encroachments. Prior to the project being let to contract, landowners will be contacted by the SDDOT or City Government regarding how each encroachment will be addressed or handled. If it is determined that the removal of an encroachment is required, it will be the landowner s responsibility to remove the encroachment. For additional information please contact: Ronald Peterson, Area Engineer SDDOT Yankton Area Office 1306 W 31st Yankton, SD 57078-9662 Phone: 605-668-2929 ext.1302001; E-Mail: Ronald.Peterson@state.sd.us

Environmental, Social & Economic Impacts and Advanced Utility Coordination Environmental, Social & Economic Impacts Project will comply with all state and federal environmental regulations No splitting of neighborhoods will occur as a result of this project Project will be coordinated with the following state and federal agencies: SD Dept. of Environment & Natural Resources SD Dept. of Game, Fish & Parks US Fish & Wildlife Service State Historic Preservation Office For additional information, please contact : Terry Keller, Environmental Supervisor SDDOT Project Development Office 700 E. Broadway Ave. Pierre SD 57501 Phone: 605-773-3721; E-Mail: Terry.Keller@state.sd.us Advanced Utility Coordination Highway projects may require adjustments or relocation of existing utilities located along or crossing the highway project. The SDDOT has an "Advanced Utility Coordinating Process" in place that addresses all existing utility involvement. This process involves meeting with the utility owner and project designers to review any conflicts and determine the most cost effective option of changing the design to avoid the existing utility or adjusting the utility. If the utility is required to relocate, all replacement utility easement acquisition and relocation work will be addressed and coordinated between the landowner and the utility company. For additional information please contact: Levi Briggs, Utility Coordinator SDDOT Road Design Office 700 E. Broadway Ave. Pierre, SD 57501 Phone 605-773-3433; E-Mail: Levi.Briggs@state.sd.us

Wetland Mitigation Registry Form Federal regulations require that unavoidable wetland impacts caused by highway construction be mitigated. Wetland mitigations may be from 1) wetland creation typically, at a borrow pit; 2) wetland restoration plugging an existing, drained wetland; or, 3) by small dam construction. The South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) may participate in the cost of wetland creation/restoration, if the wetland can be used to mitigate wetland impacts caused by highway construction. If you are interested in creating or restoring wetlands on your property, please complete the attached form and mail to: Terry Keller, Environmental Supervisor SDDOT, and 700 E. Broadway Ave., Pierre, SD 57501. Your name will be added to the SDDOT Wetland Mitigation Registry and a SDDOT representative will contact you with additional information. Yes, I am interested in assisting the SDDOT to mitigate wetland impacts by creating or restoring wetlands on my property. Name: Address: Phone #: Legal Description of property: 1/4 of Section Township, Range, County Please note: Completion of this form does not commit either you or the SDDOT to a mitigation project. It is a statement of intent only.

Individual Landowner Meetings The purpose of this meeting is to provide you with an opportunity to comment on various issues pertaining to the design of this highway project as it relates to your property. The following topics will be discussed at the meetings. Please note that not all topics will apply to every property owner. 1. Permanent purchase and/or temporary use of your property. 2. Locations and widths of entrances to your property: The standard South Dakota Department of Transportation (SDDOT) entrance-width for rural highways is 24 feet. Note: In general, existing entrance widths along rural State Highways are 24 feet or smaller. A maximum width of 40 feet is allowed at locations where it is deemed appropriate and necessary. Entrances in urban areas can vary from 16 feet to 40 feet. The goal of the SDDOT is to provide property owners located adjacent to the project with the access they need, and at the same time, enhance highway safety and reduce project costs. In some instances, the SDDOT may seek to combine duplicate entrances. For example, if your property has two or three entrances to the same property that are located close to each other, we would ask you to assess your current entrance needs and consider one entrance location that will meet those needs. 3. Permanent fencing adjacent to the highway: SDDOT s fencing policy allows for the replacement of all disturbed fence with like-kind fence. Two fence types are typically installed: Type 2: 4-strand barbed wire with 8-inch wire spacing, and Type 6: 32-inch woven wire with 1 strand of barbed wire on the bottom and 2 strands of barbed wire on the top. Page 12 of the Better Roads Brochure contains added discussion of your permanent fencing options. This brochure will be available at the meeting. 4. Temporary fencing adjacent to the highway: Do you anticipate having livestock in pastures located adjacent to the proposed project during highway construction activities? 5. Are you aware of any waterlines, drainfields, septic tanks, underground storage tanks, underground power lines, etc. that are located adjacent to the project and may be impacted by construction activities? 6. Are there any highway-related drainage or flooding problems located along your property or elsewhere along this section of highway? 7. Possible sites for gravel and additional fill material: Are you aware of potential material available for construction that might be located adjacent to the highway? 8. Temporary access during construction activities. Please review your property and be prepared to discuss the above issues, as well as any other issues that you feel are unique to your property. No offers to acquire property will be made at these meetings since revisions to the plans may occur from your input.

Access Management PUBLIC COMMENTS Project: South Dakota s P 0018(179)402 Commitment to Safety and PCN: Smart 036L Investment Hutchinson Decisions and Turner In Transportation County Location: US18 From US81 to SD19 Name: Date: Address: Written testimony will be included in the meeting record. Please submit comments by Feb.26, 2015. Send to: Karen Olson, Road Design Engineering Supervisor E-Mail Address: Karen.Olson@state.sd.us South Dakota Department of Transportation 700 East Broadway Avenue Pierre, SD 57501-2586