McGill University School of Architecture ARCH 652 Architectural History and Theory Seminar 2 Fall 2016 Monday and Wednesday 8:30 10:30 Room MH 207 Instructor David Theodore david.theodore@mcgill.ca 514-398-2862; office hours; casual or by appointment Room 301, Macdonald-Harrington Building Calendar Description Arch 652 Second of four intensive seminars on the thematic study of modern architecture and its theoretical underpinnings as a response to technological, cultural, environmental, and philosophical challenges. Historiographical and design approaches to architectural problems encountered from the pre-industrial age to contemporary post-industrial expansion. Course Objectives There are three skills students will develop in this seminar: reading, talking, and writing. None of these are trivial. Your grade will be based on both your speaking and your writing. There s enough reading every week that you ll have to learn how to distil a large number of pages down to a few important arguments and pieces of evidence. In each of our class meetings, you ll also have to speak with confidence and engage your classmates as peers. In terms of content, we will seek to understand the engagement of theory and architecture. Theory, in this case, will be drawn from philosophers; explications of philosophical ideas; and from the methodologies of architectural historians. Requirements i) Note-taking/bibliography + questions: 10% (pass/fail) Each student will hand in a question that could form the basis of discussion for each reading each week (e.g. week 4 has 4 readings; therefore, four questions). Questions are to be posted in the Discussion Forum on MyCourses by 6 pm Sunday the night before the related seminar. Note-taking requirement will be discussed in class and (Week 5) ii) Participation: 10% ii) s: 10% (pass/fail) Each student will prepare and lead discussion twice in a smaller group in Page 1 of 6
cooperation with me. In the week preceding the respective session, the three (or four) of us will meet to discuss the key issues to be addressed and plan the seminar session. iv) In-class, ten-minute paper presentation 10% v) Term paper. The paper will explore a recent book of theory, summarizing and elucidating it, and then suggesting how the theory could engage architecture (i.e. topics such as buildings, architects, architectural education, history, architectural tourism, preservation, design and construction, and ethics). The paper has three components: a) Paper proposal: 10%. Due 17 October. b) Critical summary (précis) of the book: 10%. Due 26 October. c) Final paper: 40%. Due 7 December (5,000 to 7,500 words including references). Optional review of draft of final paper: date to be determined. Late Policy Grades for late work will be penalized at one grade level per day. For example, work graded as A but handed in in one day late will receive a A- ; work graded as A but handed in two days late will receive a B+. Ethics Please note that all projects dealing with human subjects require ethics review and approval before research can begin. For more information, see: http://www.mcgill.ca/research/researchers/compliance/human If you have questions, please see the Director of the School of Architecture. McGill Policy Statements The following two statements must be included in all course outlines, in keeping with various Senate resolutions: McGill University values academic integrity. Therefore, all students must understand the meaning and consequences of cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Code of Student Conduct and Disciplinary Procedures (see www.mcgill.ca/students/srr/honest/ for more information). (Approved by Senate on 29 January 2003.) In accord with McGill University s Charter of Students Rights, students in this course have the right to submit in English or in French any written work that is to be graded. (Approved by Senate on 21 January 2009 - see also the section in this document on Assignments and evaluation.) "In the event of extraordinary circumstances beyond the University s control, the content and/or evaluation scheme in this course is subject to change." Page 2 of 6
Schedule and Required Readings This schedule and list of required reading are subject to change. Students without any background in architectural theory may wish to consult: C. Greig Crysler, Stephen Cairns, Hilde Heyne, ed., The SAGE Handbook of Architectural Theory, (London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2012). K. Michael Hays, ed., Architecture Theory since 1968 (Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1998). Neil Leach, ed., Rethinking Architecture: A Reader in Cultural Theory (New York: Routledge, 1997). Kate Nesbitt, ed., Theorizing a New Agenda for Architecture: An Anthology of Architectural Theory, 1965-1995 (Princeton: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996). Joan Ockman and Edward Eigen, ed., Architecture Culture, 1943-1968: A Documentary Anthology (New York: Rizzoli, 1993). Week 0 2 September First class Week 1 5 September No class: Labour Day 7 September INTRODUCTION a) Martin Heidegger, The Question Concerning Technology. a) Nikolaus Pevsner, Introduction, An Outline of European Architecture (Thames 1942), xix-xxi. Week 2 12 September AESTHETICS b) Immanuel Kant, Analytic of the Beautiful, First and Second Moment of Taste; Analytic of the Sublime sec. 23-27, from The Critique of Judgement [1790], trans. James Creed Meredith (Oxford, 2007). c) David Hume, Of the Standard of Taste, Four Dissertations (London, 1757). d) The Art of the Time Image: Gilles Deleuze (only the beginning is required: pp. 289-91), in Robert L. Wicks, European Aesthetics: A Critical Introduction (2013), 289-308. 14 September with two students in preparation for the following week Week 3 19 September CONSCIOUSNESS a) John Searle, Minds, Brains, and Programs, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no. (1980): 417-24. b) Thomas Nagel, What is it Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review 83, no. 4 (Oct. 1974): 435-50. c) Frank Jackson, Epiphenominal Qualia, The Philosophical Quarterly 32, no. 127 (Apr. 1982): 127-36. d) René Descartes, Meditation 6, Meditations on First Philosophy. 21 September Page 3 of 6
Week 4 26 September PHENOMENOLOGY a) Caroline A. Jones, "The Mediated Sensorium," in Sensorium: Embodied Experience, Technology, and Contemporary Art, ed. Caroline A. Jones (Cambridge: MIT Press, 2006), 5-49. b) Sean Kelley, Edmund Husserl and Phenomenology, in The Blackwell Guide to Continental Philosophy, ed. Robert C. Solomon and David Sherman (Oxford: Blackwell, 2003), 112-42. c) Iris Young, Throwing Like a Girl: A Phenomenology of Feminine Body Comportment, Motility, and Spatiality, in Throwing Like a Girl and Other Essays in Feminist Philosophy and Social Theory (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990), 141-159. 28 September Week 5 3 October EMBODIMENT a) David J. Chalmers and Andy Clark, The Extended Mind," Analysis 58, no. 1 (1998): 7-19. b) Harry Francis Mallgrave, Know Thyself : Or What Designers Can Learn from the Contemporary Biological Sciences, in Sarah Robinson, Juhani Pallasmaa, eds., Mind in Architecture: Neuroscience, Embodiment, and the Future of Design (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2015). c) Jesse Prinz, Is Consciousness Embodied? in Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, ed. P. Robbins and. M. Aydede (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). 5 October NUTS AND BOLTS: writing, note-taking, reading. Bring two copies of the draft for your proposal. Week 6 10 October No Class (Thanksgiving) 12 October Week 7 PAPER PROPOSAL DUE; email PDF; hardcopy in mailbox 17 October SPACE a) Peter Collins, New Concepts of Space, Changing ideals in Modern Architecture, 2 nd edition (Montreal: MQUP, 1998), 285-94. b) Adrian Forty, Space, Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture (Thames and Hudson, 2000). c) Farid Masrour, The Geometry of Visual Space and the Nature of Visual Experience, Philosophical Studies 172 (2015): 1813-1832. d) Sigfried Giedion, Space, Time, and Architecture. The Growth of A New Tradition, (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard UP, 1982). Page 4 of 6
Selections from the 3 rd edition (1956): 30-54, 426-439, 287-493, 592-595, 730, index. 19 October Week 8 24 October BODIES a) David Valentine, Chapter 4, Imagining Transgender: An Ethnography of a Category (Durham: Duke UP, 2007), 143-72. b) Lucas Cassidy Crawford, Derivative Plumbing: Redesigning Washrooms, Bodies, and Trans Affects in ds+r s Brasserie, Journal of Homosexuality 61, no. 5 (2014): 621-35. c) J. Kent Fitzsimons, Seeing Motion Otherwise: Rethinking Architecture through the Differently Sensing and Mobile, Space and Culture vol. 15 no. 3 2012. d) Michael Warner, Queer and Then? Chronicle of Higher Education: The Chronicle Review (www.chronicle.com), January 1, 2012. 26 October Week 9 PAPER PRÉCIS DUE; email PDF; hardcopy in mailbox 31 October ANT a) Bruno Latour, Drawing Things Together, Representation in Scientific Activity, ed. Michael Lynch and Steve Woolgar (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1990), 19-68. b) Bruno Latour and Albena Yaneva, Give Me A Gun and I Will Make All Buildings Move : An Ant s View of Architecture, Architectural Theories of the Environment: Posthuman Territory, (Routledge, Taylor & Francis Books Ltd.): 107-115. c) Albena Yaneva, Is the Atrium More important than the Lab: Designer Buildings for New Cultures of Creativity, in Geographies of Science, ed. P. Meusberger and Jons, H. (New York: Springer, 2009), 139-51. d) Albena Yaneva, Reconnecting Practice, RIBA Research Symposium 2009: Changing Practices. 2 November Week 10 NEGATIVE THEORY 7 November a) Fredric Jameson, Architecture and the Critique of ideology, (Hays excerpt). b) Michael K. Hays, Critical Architecture: Between Culture and Form, Perspecta, 21 (1984): 14-29. c) Hays, K. Michael, Next to Nothing, in The Return of Nature: Sustaining Architecture in the Face of Sustainability, ed. Preston Scott Cohen and Erika Naginski (New York: Routledge, 2014), 71-78. Page 5 of 6
9 November Week 11 14 November SR/OOO a) Graham Harman, brief SR/OOO Tutorial, https://doctorzamalek2.wordpress.com/2010/07/23/brief-sroootutorial/ b) Dan Zahavi, The End of What? Phenomenology vs. Speculative Realism, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 24, no. 3 (2016): 289-309. c) David Ruy, Returning to (Strange) Objects, tarp Architecture Manual (2012): 38-42. d) Andrew Cole, Those Obscure Objects of Desire, Artforum International 53, no.10 (Summer 2015): 319. e) Graham Harman, "Object lesson," Artforum International 5, no. 1 (2015): 38+. 20 July 2016. 16 November Week 12 21 November SPATIAL a) Henri Lefebvre, excerpts from Production of Space (Hays reader). b) Lucasz Stanek, Chapter 3, Critique: Space as Concrete Abstraction, Henri Lefebvre on Space: Architecture, Urban Research, and the Production of Theory (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011), 133-64. c) Edward Soja, The City and Spatial Justice, «La ville et la justice spatiale», trad. Sophie Didier and Frédéric Dufaux, Justice Spatiale Spatial Justice 01 (September 2009). 23 November Week 13 28 November HISTORIANS AND THEORY a) Louis Martin, Against Architecture, Log 16 (Spring/Summer 2009): 153-67. b) C. Greig Crysler, Stephen Cairns, Hilde Heyne, Introduction, The SAGE Handbook of Architectural Theory, 1-21. c) Mark Jarzombek, The Disciplinary Dislocations of (Architectural) History, SJAH 58, no. 3 (1999): 488-93. d) K. Michael Hays, Introduction, Architecture Theory since 1968 (Cambridge, MA: MIT, 1998), x-xv. 30 November STUDENT PRESENTATIONS Week 14 5 December STUDENT PRESENTATIONS Last Class PAPER DUE Page 6 of 6