Accelerated ROW Process for Sidewalks FAQ s

Similar documents
Accelerated Right-of-Way Process for Sidewalks

Ohio Department of Transportation. Division of Engineering. Office of Real Estate. Synergy. Real Estate Business Analysis

SECTION 7000 LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS

PROJECT: P 0037(129)207 PCN: 039K BROWN COUNTY. S.D. Highway 37 From Aspen Ave to U.S. Highway 12 in Groton

REGULAR AGENDA ITEM December 10, 2014 Commission Meeting Eagle Road and McMillan Road ( Project )

L L O T DESIGN GUIDELINES. Appendices

Section 4.1 LAND TITLE

Right of Way Acquisition

Locally Administered Projects Overview

7. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Encroachment Permit Instructions and Application

The Uniform Act. Acquisition, Relocation & Demolition. Disaster Recovery CDBG Administration Training. February 14, 2012

Village of Glenview Zoning Board of Appeals

REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING NOVEMBER 15, 2017 CARLTON M. VIVEIROS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COMMUNITY ROOM 525 SLADE STREET FALL RIVER, MA :00 PM

Once your eligibility has been approved, you will need to provide a strategy containing the specific details of the proposed tankering arrangements.

Property Owner/Address: Holiday Partners, LLC & Dawson-AZ, LLC 168 N. 9 th Street, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83702

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

Streamlining the Entitlement Process for Transit-Oriented Development

APPENDIX G: SAMPLE CROSS-ACCESS AGREEMENTS

Senate Eminent Domain Bill SF 2750 As passed by the Senate. House Eminent Domain Bill HF 2846/SF 2750* As passed by the House.

REGULAR AGENDA ITEM May 25, 2016 Commission Meeting

May 21, ACHD Board of Commissioners Stacey Yarrington, Planner II DRH /DRH

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing

Preserving and Protecting Business Capital

Request for Proposals

Property Information. Date: 4/12/2016. Parcel ID: R Site Address: 107 N Olde Park Pl Eagle Warmest Regards,

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING

Encroachment Permit Application Instructions

CASE SUMMARY Conditional District Zoning Modification Planning Commission January 9, 2013 CD M1212

Information Needed for a Building Permit

Committed to Service

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING FEBRUARY 28, 2018 KENNEDY MIDDLE SCHOOL, AUDITORIUM SPRINGFIELD, MASSACHUSETTS 6:30 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SURVEY SUBCOMMITTEE WHITE PAPER SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MAY 15, 2009

Property Information. Date: 4/12/2016. Parcel ID: R Site Address: 81 N Olde Park Pl Eagle Warmest Regards,

PROJECT NH 0050(99)381 PCN 6926 YANKTON COUNTY. SD HWY 50 (4 th Street) from Broadway Ave to Archery Road in Yankton, SD

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Transfer of Development Rights

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 18, 2017

Pipelines & Eminent Domain THE PROPOSED KINDER MORGAN PERMIAN HIGHWAY PIPELINE OCTOBER 29, 2018 JIM BRADBURY JAMES D.

STAFF REPORT. To: Planning Commission Meeting date: January 11, 2017 Item: UN Prepared by: Marc Jordan. Schoolhouse Development, LLC

Referral Partnership Program

Sidewalk Program Policy Revised: 06 November 13

MEASURE U: Medical Marijuana FAQ 01/26/2017 Measure U info is at

THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE

DEVELOPMENT COVENANTS PROPOSED PUD B 1 ZONING FOR THE MAXPAC SITE

McGowin Park, LLC. B-3, Community Business District

Charter Township of Garfield Grand Traverse County

OFFICE OF REAL ESTATE

Guidelines for the Approval of New Homes Sales Offices (Building Permits, Agreements, Securities)

MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROBIN DICKERSON, CITY ENGINEER

Handling Multiple Offers

property even if the parties have no lease arrangement. This is often called an option contract.

PROJECTS: P 0083(74)56; 036E; JONES COUNTY NH 0083(79)45; 04E7; MELLETTE COUNTY NH 0083(80)44; 04E8; MELLETTE COUNTY

Glades County TEMPORARY USE PERMIT APPLICATION

A Minor Land Excavation Operating Permit is used to:

Warren County, Missouri Delinquent Tax Certificate Sale Frequently Asked Questions

The Uniform Act. CDBG Disaster Recovery Regional Training Acquisition Rehabilitation Demolition Displacement August 2015

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT JEA SEWER SYSTEM CUSTOMER OWNED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED

INFORMATIONAL HANDOUT

ASSOCIATION OF UNITED STATES POSTAL LESSORS

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of January 21, 2017

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 12, 2011

TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TIME EXTENSION

RECITALS. WHEREAS, the GMA requires counties to adopt county-wide planning policies in cooperation with cities within the County; and

BLUEPRINT REAL ESTATE POLICY

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: March 1, 2018

Right of Way Procedures for Highway Occupancy Permits (HOP) The following policies and revised deed forms are attached:

SUB /CAR /PUD

SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING AMENDMENT, & SIDEWALK WAIVER STAFF REPORT Date: July 19, 2018

Appendix A. Definitions

RFQ INDEFINITE DELIVERIES CONTRACT - LAND SURVEYING SERVICES MAY

A Guide for Developers, Public Officials, and Lenders

Joint Ownership And Its Challenges: Using Entities to Limit Liability

Belcher 1 USING THE EASEMENT ASSIGNMENT PROCESS FOR EFFICIENT UTILITY RELOCATION OF A LOCALLY ADMINISTERED PROJECT

PLNSUB Meridian Commerce Center Subdivision Amendment & PLNPCM Meridian Commerce Center Street Closure

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LOTTERY AND CHARITABLE GAMES CONTROL BOARD NOTICE OF FINAL RULEMAKING

City Council Report 915 I Street, 1 st Floor Sacramento, CA

Welcome to District 6-0

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 12, 2017 TOWN HALL SULLIVAN MEETING ROOM 558 SOUTH MAIN STREET RAYNHAM, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

GRAHAM PEDESTRIAN TRANSPORTATION PLAN

State Revolving Fund Loan Programs Guidance for Project Land Acquisition For SRF Financed Projects

SECTION 6 - SERVICE CONNECTIONS

Questions and Answers for RFA Housing Credit Financing for the Preservation of Existing Affordable Multifamily Housing Developments

PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING JULY 19, 2017 HOLYOKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE KITTREDGE CENTER HOLYOKE, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00 PM FOR THE PROPOSED

Guide to Combined Preliminary and Final Plats

Brad Faiman, NDDOT Right of Way Raymond Barchenger, NDDOT Right of Way

RIGHT OF WAY ENGINEERING MANUAL

Purpose of the Public Hearing

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING MAY 18, 2017 GROVELAND TOWN HALL GROVELAND, MASSACHUSETTS 7:00PM FOR THE PROPOSED

The following is a list of assumptions on which this Term Sheet is based:

CAPITAL ASSETS. POLICY No

SHORE DRIVE CORRIDOR: PAST, PRESENT, & FUTURE APRIL 19, 2018 BAYFRONT ADVISORY COMMISSION

CITY OF VINELAND ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION INSTRUCTION SHEET

THE WAIVER OF APPRAISAL

Frequently Asked Questions About 20B Undergrounding Updated on June 17, 2014

Understand Exhibit A foundational info. Definition Update triggers Value to an airport Sponsor Where we ve been & where we re at today

ROOSEVELT IRRIGATION DISTRICT

Town of Dover. Presentation on Article 20

Village of Glenview Plan Commission

Transcription:

Accelerated ROW Process for Sidewalks FAQ s General FAQs... 3 1. What is the Accelerated ROW Process for Sidewalks?... 3 2. When is the Process Available?... 3 3. Can the accelerated right-of-way process be used on non-limited scope projects?... 3 4. Can the Temporary Infeasible Form (TIF) Process still be used on a project following the new Accelerated Rightof-Way Process for Sidewalk Work?... 3 Survey & Mapping FAQs... 3 1. In general, what is the level of survey mapping completed for limited scope resurfacing projects, to support, among other aspects of the project, the preparation of ROW Documents, such as IPM s for permanent sidewalk easements?... 3 2. What funding sources are available for completion of a project s mapping and survey during Concept Development?... 3 ROW FAQs... 4 1. Why not use a fee simple taking to accommodate needed ADA sidewalk work?... 4 2. Can the accelerated right-of-way process be used on parcels involving fee acquisitions?... 4 3. How will the Department handle sidewalk easements (temporary and permanent) that don t settle with affected property owners?... 4 4. Does the preparation of Individual Parcel Maps (IPM s) have to be on the critical path of a project s schedule?... 4 5. Do temporary sidewalk parcels appear on the Entire Tract Maps (ETM s) and General Property Parcel Maps (GPPM s) completed for our projects?... 4 6. What are the recommended strategies for accessing Green Acres properties and railroad properties to complete sidewalk work needed to comply with ADA requirements?... 5 7. For temporary and permanent sidewalk easements involving the same Block and Lot, should those easements be kept separate or just one permanent easement be acquired, for simplicity, to cover all of the proposed sidewalk work?... 5 8. Does the roadway baseline always have to be shown on Individual Parcel Maps (IPM s)?... 5 9. Can the new sidewalk right-of-way agreements and descriptions, covering temporary and permanent sidewalk easements, be used to address adjustments in existing driveways when such adjustments are needed to accommodate ADA sidewalk work?... 5 10. Can Administrative Determinations of Values (ADV s) be used on both temporary and permanent sidewalk easements?... 5 11. In addition to the $25,000 ceiling, are there other considerations influencing the applicability of the use of... 5 Administrative Determinations of Value (ADV s)?... 5 12. Who can complete Administrative Determinations of Values (ADV s)?... 5 13. Do traffic signal upgrades to accommodate ADA requirements, such as pedestrian push buttons and countdown displays, fall under the new sidewalk easements associated with the Accelerated Right-of-Way Process?... 6

14. Can the accelerated right-of-way process be used for ADA sidewalk work that involves parcels with documented environmental contamination?... 6 15. Will a new curb ramp, located outside the exiting roadway right-of-way need a temporary or permanent sidewalk easement?... 6 16. For Limited Scope Resurfacing Projects, for which only a few sidewalk parcels are outstanding, will Right-of- Way (ROW) Waivers (i.e., allowing the project to advance to construction with ROW availability dates in the project s specifications), be granted?... 6

Accelerated ROW Process for Sidewalks FAQ s General FAQs 1. What is the Accelerated ROW Process for Sidewalks? a. It is a ROW process that utilizes accelerated tools (sidewalk right-of-way agreements, temporary and permanent sidewalk easement descriptions, Administrative Determinations of Values (ADV s), and simplified title research). 2. When is the Process Available? a. The Process is available for use now on the Department s projects. New start projects (i.e., those just entering Concept Development), especially limited scope resurfacing project, will be able to take full advantage of the new process. Given the foregoing considerations, the accelerated timeframes associated with the new process, as well at the updated Concept Development and Final Design Network Diagrams, should be reflected in limited scope resurfacing projects entering the Concept Development Phase. 3. Can the accelerated right-of-way process be used on non-limited scope projects? a. Yes, this process may be used on non-limited scope projects, where the right-of-way impacts involve ADA sidewalk work meeting the definitions of the new temporary and permanent sidewalk easements. 4. Can the Temporary Infeasible Form (TIF) Process still be used on a project following the new Accelerated Right-of-Way Process for Sidewalk Work? a. Yes, use of the Accelerated Right-of-Way Process for Sidewalk Work does not preclude the use of the TIF Process. Survey & Mapping FAQs 1. In general, what is the level of survey mapping completed for limited scope resurfacing projects, to support, among other aspects of the project, the preparation of ROW Documents, such as IPM s for permanent sidewalk easements? a. Level 3 survey mapping and supplemental survey efforts, as needed, are generally completed for resurfacing projects. For resurfacing projects, it is recommended that the Level 3 survey mapping be completed as earlier in the project development process as possible, preferably during Concept Development. 2. What funding sources are available for completion of a project s mapping and survey during Concept Development? a. State funds could be used, as well as federal funding, either through the issuance of task orders by the Department s CADD & Survey Services Office or through the federally funded Concept Development task orders recently issued by the Department.

ROW FAQs 1. Why not use a fee simple taking to accommodate needed ADA sidewalk work? a. Completing a fee simple acquisition for ADA sidewalk work is not recommended due to a number of considerations, some of which include: In accordance with NJ Administrative Code 16:38-3.1 Policies, sidewalks located within the state s public roadway right-of-way must be maintained by the adjacent property owner, except for the special circumstances listed under that code Fee acquisitions can alter property setbacks, as associated with local ordinances, which may not be an outcome favored by affected property owners. Despite these considerations, the Department s Right-of-Way Division will consider a fee acquisition, to accommodate sidewalk ADA work, if that type of acquisition is requested by the affected property owner. 2. Can the accelerated right-of-way process be used on parcels involving fee acquisitions? a. No, because full-blown appraisals and more thorough title research will need to be completed for parcels involving fee acquisitions. It is further anticipated that timeframes needed to acquire such parcels will follow the Department s standard acquisition timeframes, as opposed to the expedited timeframes associated with the accelerated process. 3. How will the Department handle sidewalk easements (temporary and permanent) that don t settle with affected property owners? a. For sidewalk easements that do not settle within 60 days (three months, using working days), a full appraisal must be completed, to replace ADV s completed for those easements. A full title search for such easements also must be completed to replace the limited search initially completed for them. These steps must be taken so that these easements can advance to condemnation if needed. Given the foregoing considerations, additional time will be needed to secure easements that do not settle within 60 days. This additional time may extend the duration of acquiring such easements to be on the order of standard timeframes associated with the Department s right-ofway acquisition process. 4. Does the preparation of Individual Parcel Maps (IPM s) have to be on the critical path of a project s schedule? a. No, especially for temporary sidewalk parcels for which existing as-built plans, aerial mapping, and/or tax maps are available. Since temporary parcels do not have to be filed, their IPM s do not have to be certified by a professional surveyor. The IPM s for temporary sidewalk parcels also can be kept off the critical path of the project s schedule, by completing these parcels as advanced acquisitions. Through advanced acquisition the IPM s for these parcels can be completed, and their acquisition advanced ahead of other parcels, such as permanent sidewalk parcels and non-sidewalk parcels. 5. Do temporary sidewalk parcels appear on the Entire Tract Maps (ETM s) and General Property Parcel Maps (GPPM s) completed for our projects? a. No, temporary sidewalk parcels are not to be included in ETM s and GPPM s; permanent sidewalk parcels do need to be shown on ETM s and GPPM s.

6. What are the recommended strategies for accessing Green Acres properties and railroad properties to complete sidewalk work needed to comply with ADA requirements? a. For both Green Acres and railroad properties, it is recommended that access for such work is obtained through either: (1) a temporary access right (good for up to 2 years) for Green Acres properties; and, (2) a temporary access right, such as obtaining a license from the involved railroad company. These strategies tend to limit the cost and time that may be associated with obtaining permanent access rights, such as permanent sidewalk easements, with these entities. 7. For temporary and permanent sidewalk easements involving the same Block and Lot, should those easements be kept separate or just one permanent easement be acquired, for simplicity, to cover all of the proposed sidewalk work? a. The recommendation is to keep the temporary and permanent sidewalk easements separated, since that approach will help to limit the extra work, such as supplemental survey efforts, associated with the right-of-way mapping needed for permanent sidewalk easements. 8. Does the roadway baseline always have to be shown on Individual Parcel Maps (IPM s)? a. No, however an existing right-of-way line always will be shown on IPM s, based on the best available information, which could include existing as-builts, aerial mapping and/or tax maps. 9. Can the new sidewalk right-of-way agreements and descriptions, covering temporary and permanent sidewalk easements, be used to address adjustments in existing driveways when such adjustments are needed to accommodate ADA sidewalk work? a. Yes, language can be included in the right-of-way documents prepared for temporary and permanent sidewalk easements that covers adjustments needed for existing driveways to accommodate ADA sidewalk work. 10. Can Administrative Determinations of Values (ADV s) be used on both temporary and permanent sidewalk easements? a. Yes, ADV s can be used on both temporary and permanent sidewalk easements, so long as the property value in question does not exceed the $25,000.00 ceiling placed on the use of ADV s. 11. In addition to the $25,000 ceiling, are there other considerations influencing the applicability of the use of Administrative Determinations of Value (ADV s)? a. Yes, even when a ROW parcel is valued at less than $25,000 other considerations may arise that make use of an ADV not practical or appropriate, such as: If the parcel is affecting existing vehicular parking, a full appraisal is appropriate since a Cost-to-Cure Report may be required to mitigate the parking impacts. When the parcel has a history of significant environmental contamination, there is a greater likelihood for encountering complications and extended durations in settling the parcel with the affected property owner. When the affected property owner is not interested in pursuing negotiations with the Department, to settle on the ROW parcel, a full appraisal will be needed to support the condemnation process. 12. Who can complete Administrative Determinations of Values (ADV s)? a. For the Department s capital projects, the Team Leaders at the Right-of-Way District Offices can complete ADV s. For Local Aid Projects, a tax assessor or purchaser of real estate associated with the involved municipality can complete ADV s.

13. Do traffic signal upgrades to accommodate ADA requirements, such as pedestrian push buttons and countdown displays, fall under the new sidewalk easements associated with the Accelerated Right-of-Way Process? a. No, the new sidewalk easements do not cover traffic signal equipment that needs to be placed outside of existing public roadway right-of-way. The right-of-way acquisition for placing traffic signal equipment outside of existing roadway right-of-way must follow the existing right-of-way process, including the use of the proper right-of-way parcel type and description, as found needed by the Right-of-Way Engineering Office based on that office s review of specific project circumstances. 14. Can the accelerated right-of-way process be used for ADA sidewalk work that involves parcels with documented environmental contamination? a. Yes, however the simplified sidewalk right-of-way agreement should be modified to include the more complicated environmental clauses recommended for such parcels. 15. Will a new curb ramp, located outside the exiting roadway right-of-way need a temporary or permanent sidewalk easement? a. A permanent sidewalk easement should be used for the construction of a new curb ramp, outside the existing roadway right-of-way; given the more complex design associated with the curb ramp, it is recommended that the Department maintain the ramp in the future, as opposed to having the property owner be responsible for the ramp s future maintenance as would be indicated if only a temporary sidewalk easement was obtained. 16. For Limited Scope Resurfacing Projects, for which only a few sidewalk parcels are outstanding, will Right-of- Way (ROW) Waivers (i.e., allowing the project to advance to construction with ROW availability dates in the project s specifications), be granted? a. Obtaining all of the needed ROW parcels during the design phase is encouraged on Limited Scope Resurfacing Projects; however, the Department s Division of Right-of-Way and Access Management, will entertain the issuance of ROW Waivers on these projects, on a case-by-case basis, given the time constraints associated with these resurfacing projects. In support of such waivers, the project designer will need to confirm that the project can be effectively and efficiently staged in a manner that avoids the outstanding right-of-way, until the anticipated time frame for acquiring the needed right-of-way.