Montgomery County Demographics

Similar documents
Frederick County Agricultural Land Preservation Program

The Maryland Rural Legacy and CREP Easement Programs

Land Preservation Programs Valuation Discussion

ZEKIAH WATERSHED RURAL LEGACY AREA

Taxes and Land Preservation Computing the Capital Gains Tax

LEGISLATIVE PURPOSES. 2. Provide sources of agricultural products within the state for the citizens of the state

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 769 A BILL ENTITLED

Instructions: Script:

2016 Highlands Region Land Preservation Status Report

Public Information Meeting: Mattapany Rural Legacy Area - Proposed Expansion

General Development Plan Background Report on Agricultural Land Preservation

UNOFFICIAL COPY OF HOUSE BILL 1272 A BILL ENTITLED

Appendix J Agricultural Land Preservation in Other States

(a) Administrator: "Administrator" means the county employee assigned to administer the provisions of this subtitle.

Section Intent

PURCHASE OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS AND TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS CASE STUDIES

Kefauver-Canfield RLP Aerial

TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS

Cecil County, Maryland Purchase of Development Rights Program APPLICATION TO SELL AN EASEMENT

Four American TDR Programs

ORDINANCE NO. ORD-2014-

PROTECTING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED. C. Ronald Franks Audrey Scott

a. It is the intent of these regulations to encourage the preservation of natural resources and facilitate orderly growth in the County.

CONSERVATION EASEMENTS. Public Policy Considerations for PRIVATE Land Management Harriet M. Hageman Hageman & Brighton, P.C.

2015 ACEP-ALE SUMMARY

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA October 25, :00 A.M. HOPEWELL MANOR EXPANSION PROJECT Jason Divelbiss (attachment)

Chapter XX Purchase of Development Rights Program

Farmland Preservation Agreements. -Frequently Asked Questions-

Otto Farm LLC, Shepherdstown Pike

Appraisals of the Current Market Value of Development Easements

Innovative Local Government Land Conservation Techniques

Special Consideration Multiple jurisdictions is cumbersome

SADC Guidance Document Farmland Preservation: Frequently Asked Questions

Torch Lake Township Antrim County, Michigan

Protecting Farmland in Maryland: A Review of the Agricultural Land Preservation Program

Preserving Forested Lands

Chapter VIII. Conservation Easements: Valuing Property Subject to a Qualified Conservation Contribution

Summary of Key Issues from Skagit County TDR Focus Group Meetings January 7, 2014

2018 Highlands Region Land Preservation Status Report

Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) in Practice

Appendix T Chapter VIII IMPLEMENTATION

Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Program in Frederick County, VA. Frederick County Department of Planning and Development

NC General Statutes - Chapter 106 Article 61 1

METHODOLOGY GUIDE VALUING LANDS IN TRANSITION IN ONTARIO. Valuation Date: January 1, 2016

WHAT CAN FARMLAND PRESERVATION, RIGHT TO FARM, AG MEDIATION & FARM LINK DO FOR ME?

Questions Commonly Asked by Prospective & New Homeowners Regarding Front Foot Benefit Charges (FFBC)

APPLICATION FOR TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE

Land Preservation in the Highlands Region

An Accounting Tradeoff Between WRP and Government Payments. Authors Gregory Ibendahl Mississippi State University

RLP Staff Policies Reviewing Title Commitments

DEED OF EASEMENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY AGRICULTURE RETENTION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. This Deed is made, 20. BETWEEN, and is referred to as the Grantor;

KANE COUNTY AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE AGENDA

They Ain t Making Any More of It: Conflicts, Development and Energy

TDR RULES AND PROCEDURES TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) PROGRAM

Ron Shultz, Director of Policy Washington State Conservation Commission

Frequently Asked Questions on Sustainable & Long-Term Leases in Minnesota

Walworth County Farmland Preservation Plan Update, Chapter 1 Plan Summary (Cover Document)

STATE OF OHIO FINANCIAL REPORTING APPROACH GASB 34 IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE

CLINTON COUNTY AGRICULTURAL LAND PRESERVATION BOARD Agricultural Conservation Easement Application Form

Affordable Housing Case Studies: Massachusetts & Maryland

DEED OF EASEMENT STATE OF NEW JERSEY AGRICULTURE RETENTION AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. BETWEEN, whose address is and is referred to as the Grantor;

Chapter 6 Summary Control of Land Use: Control of Land Use

ARTICLE VII TDR. 701 Purpose.

A STUDY OF TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS (TDR) IN THURSTON COUNTY, WASHINGTON

Chapter 52 FARMLAND AND OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION

Comprehensive Plan 2030

RESEARCH BRIEF. Oct. 31, 2012 Volume 2, Issue 3

What Should a TDC Bylaw Include?

Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Fund

Uniform Act for CDBG-DR

Planning Incentive Grant (PIG) Easement Purchase Application

PURCHASE OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS PROGRAMS IN THE U.S.

Rural Legacy Program (RLP) Information

A. GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPEN SPACE PLANNING

43 USC NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see

Issues at the Rural-Urban Fringe: Hillsborough County Agriculture Stewardship Program 1

ANSWERS TO COMMONLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT AGRICULTURAL LAND VALUE IN KANSAS

Status of State PACE Programs

Yolo Habitat Conservancy County of Yolo City of Davis City of Winters City of West Sacramento City of Woodland University of California, Davis

2015 Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) Reserve Wetlands Program

AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM AGRICULTURAL LAND EASEMENTS

Farmland and Open Space Preservation Purchase of Development Rights Program Frequently Asked Questions

Colorado s Legal Framework for Three Agricultural Tools:

BLAIR COUNTY. UNDERSTANDING THE Clean and Green PROGRAM. COUNTY OF BLAIR Blair County Courthouse 423 Allegheny Street Hollidaysburg, PA

Clean and Green LEBANON COUNTY UNDERSTANDING THE PROGRAM

ALC Bylaw Reviews. A Guide for Local Governments

Rule 80. Preservation of Primary Agricultural Soils Revised and approved by the Land Use Panel during its public meeting on January 31, 2006.

MUSKEGON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ORDINANCE NO MUSKEGON COUNTY FARMLAND DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ORDINANCE APPROVAL DATE: MAY 10, 2005

4. Parks and Recreation Fee Facility Needs and Cost Estimates Fee Calculation Nexus Findings 24

What is Farmland Preservation?

UNIFORM APPRAISAL DATASET (UAD) FHA SPOTLIGHT - SELECTION AND VERIFICATION OF COMPARABLE SALES

Land and Property Terminology

Snohomish County Purchase of Development Rights Program Strategic Opportunities for Farmland Conservation

2017 Annual Report. Fayette County Appraisal District P. O. Box 836 La Grange, TX 78945

CHAPTER 156: FARMLAND PRESERVATION. General Provisions. Qualifications and Certification of Farmland. Voluntary Agricultural Districts

South Sacramento Habitat Conservation Plan Nexus Study

Dakota County Farmland and Natural Areas Program. Lake Pepin TMDL May 31, 2007

More than 2,300 acres.

TOWN OF BALLSTON WORKSHOP SUMMARY OF PROPOSED ZONING CHANGES

Panama City Beach Fire Service Assessment Information

Transcription:

Formula Based Easement Valuations An Alternative to Standard Appraisals Montgomery County s Agricultural Easement Program AEP Montgomery County Demographics 1

2

Farmland Protected by Easements as of June 30, 2013 72,479 acres Public Sector Investment $59 Million 4,675 8,382 52,052 Private Sector Investment Wealth Transfer $115 Million 2,086 4,875 409 MALPF AEP MET RLP BLT TDR Formula Based Land Appraisal System Montgomery County was one of the first local jurisdictions to employ a formula based appraisal system as an alternative to standard appraisals 3

Why a Formula Based Appraisal System? There was need to reduce length of time between application and settlement of easements Was viewed as a cost containment exercise Standardized a valuation process that reduced variability in appraised values Was a useful way to compare one property against another for ranking purposes Treated all Properties equally Integrating a Formula Based Approach Montgomery County provided landowners the option of choosing the valuation method standard appraisal or the formula based appraisal method. The Formula Based Approach Provided Landowners the ability to know the maximum easement value the County could pay for an easement during their initial easement consultation appointment (vs waiting several months for the standard appraisals to be completed) 4

Integrating a Formula Based Approach What we Learned Landowners preferred the Formula Based Appraisal Approach Over time, the standard appraisal process was phased out and then ultimately removed from both the enabling Law and Regulation Formula Based Approach is now the only valuation method by which County Ag Easements are acquired. Integrating a Formula Based Approach Guidance for Implementing our Formula Based Approach was enabled through the law which governs our Agricultural Easement Program (Chapter 2B of the Montgomery County Code) Specific evaluation and valuation protocols were promulgated in the regulations governing the program (Executive Regulation 9-03AM) 5

Integrating a Formula Based Approach Over time adjustments were needed to the evaluation and valuation protocols which necessitated changes to the regulation. However flexibility was built into the Law and Regulation so that establishing an easement s base value could be set annually through Executive Order Integrating a Formula Based Approach In establishing the annual base value, the County Executive receives a recommendation from the local agricultural preservation advisory board (APAB) The APAB provides to the County Executive evidence of current land values and easement values from other State easement programs purchasing easements in Montgomery County, County sponsored appraisal studies, analyzing the current market value for Transferrable Development Rights, County and State Tax Assessment Data, or any other evidence of land values. The County Executive through Executive Order establishes the annual base value on or before July 1 of each year, expressed as dollars per point. 6

History of Base Value FY $/Points Base Value/Acre 1989 $7.00 $700 per acre 1991 $7.50 $750 per acre 1999 $8.00 $800 per acre 2004 $9.00 $900 per acre 2005 $15.00 $1,500 per acre (1st 6 months FY05) $1,700 per acre (2nd 6 months FY05) 2006-2011 $17.00 $1,700 per acre 2012 $16.00 $1,600 per acre 2013 $15.50 $1,550 per acre Establishing the Easement Value Formula Based Approach Formula Based Approach through an added value formula Points Appraisal Points awarded under each of the formula s attributes equate to a dollars/per acre purchase value Formula Based Approach determines the Maximum Easement Value To be eligible for the Maximum Easement Value a minimum of 1 TDR for every 25 acres must be retained with the property (Ag Zoning) 7

The Base Easement Value Every Farm, regardless of size receives 100 points as the Easement Base Value. This value is expressed as a function of multiplying 100 points times the County Executive approved dollars per point Example: If the County Executive establishes Base Value at $17.00 per point, then $17.00 per point/acre times 100 points would equal a base value of $1,700 per acre. 8

Added Value from the Base Value The First Attribute Size of Farm Determined by Deed, Recent Survey, or Tax Assessment Acreage For each 5 acres of Land, the added value is one percent of the base value. Example: If $1,700 is set at the base, then 1% of the base would be $17.00 dollars/point. 220 acres/5 = 44 points x $17.00 dollars/point or $748.00 in added value above the Base Value 9

Added Value from the Base Value Second Attribute Land Quality Land Quality is Determined by Grantee Land Quality Varies by Soil Quality Soil Quality is a function of the USDA Soil Capability Classification System The Added Value is Assigned Accordingly: 3 percent for each acre of Capability Class I 2 percent of each acre of Capability Class II or Woodland Group I 1 percent of each acre of Capability Class III or Woodland Group II 10

Added Value from the Base Value Third Attribute Full Implementation of Soil Conservation and Water Quality Plan. 10 percent of the Base Value is added to the Formula for farms that have fully implemented a Soil Conservation and Water Quality Plan Approved by the Montgomery Soil Conservation District If Implemented Prior to Settlement, this added value is paid at settlement If not, to receive this added value the plan must be fully implemented within 2 years of the settlement date. Funds are held by the County pending MSCD certification 11

Added Value from the Base Value Fourth Attribute Land Tenure Awarded 25 percent of the Base Value if: Gross Income of $5,000 Annually from Ag use If land is being purchased under a binding contract of sale and buyer certifies their intent to start a new Agricultural Operation or has entered into a long term lease with a third party that intends to use the land for agricultural purposes Landowner has an existing long term lease with a third party farmer intending to use the land for agricultural purposes 12

Added Value from the Base Value Fifth Attribute Road Frontage The added value for road frontage is 1 percent of the Base Value for each 50 feet of frontage on a public road Maximum of 5,000 feet Road Frontage determined by Grantor, using survey or other verifiable documentation 13

Added Value from the Base Value Sixth Attribute Agricultural Zone Edge Awarded 100 points if the property is located within 1 mile of the border of Rural Density Transfer Zone (RDT), or 1 mile within the border of an incorporated municipality or town 1 mile is determined using scaled maps by the Grantee. 14

Formula Based Appraisals Approaches and Program Evolution In Montgomery County we have expanded the use of the formula based approach to other agricultural and conservation easement programs: These include the State s Rural Legacy Program (RLP) and the County s new Building Lot Termination Program (BLT) Numerous counties in the State of Maryland employ some type of formula based valuation methodology in administering their programs locally. Summary Provides an alternative to the standard appraisal process Helps to streamline the program Should be reviewed annually so formula is properly calibrated Landowners acceptance of the approach Helps to contain some program costs Can be used as a tool to help prioritize acquisitions 15

John Zawitoski Director of Planning and Promotions Montgomery County Department of Economic Development Agricultural Services Division Phone: 301-590-2831 Email: john.zawitoski@montgomerycountymd. gov 16