Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session

Similar documents
Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2007 Session FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE

Vacant & Distressed Properties Regulations Maryland Municipal City of Baltimore. Urban; Suburban Title: City of Baltimore Special Tax Sale

Department of Legislative Services

Department of Legislative Services

April 12, The Honorable Martin O Malley And The General Assembly of Maryland

Department of Legislative Services

The Honorable Larry Hogan And The General Assembly of Maryland

The Baltimore City Property Tax Study

Evictions. Advancing Human Rights and Justice for All in Maryland since Maryland Tenants Rights: Evictions

THE TAX SALE PROCESS

2011 ASSESSMENT RATIO REPORT

HOUSE BILL 365 CHAPTER

STATE OF MARYLAND Maryland Health Connection EXECUTIVE REPORT. June 25th, 2015

DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENTS AND TAXATION 2008 RATIO REPORT

PROPERTY FORECLOSURES IN MARYLAND FOURTH QUARTER 2014

SENATE BILL 274 CHAPTER. Tax Increment Financing and Special Taxing Districts Transit Oriented Development

Maryland Farmland Conservation: Supporting Sustainable Use of Land through Tax Policy

COUNTY COUNCIL OF WICOMICO COUNTY, MARYLAND. Resolution No

TABLE OF CONTENTS. I. Executive Summary...1. II. Registration of Builders...3. A. The Home Builder Registration Unit...3

Maryland s Office of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation

GENERAL QUESTIONS ASKED ABOUT TAX SALE

RESEARCH BRIEF. Oct. 31, 2012 Volume 2, Issue 3

Department of Legislative Services

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2009 Session

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT ANALYSIS

H 7816 AS AMENDED S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

ASSEMBLY, No. 477 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 216th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2014 SESSION

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 968

AN ACT RELATING TO REAL ESTATE DEEDS OF TRUST; DESIGNATING PRIORITY AND TIME PERIODS FOR REDEMPTION RIGHTS AFTER JUDICIAL

HOUSE BILL 365. Read and Examined by Proofreaders: Sealed with the Great Seal and presented to the Governor, for his approval this

H 7816 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

Circuit Court for Montgomery County Case No v UNREPORTED

SECOND CLASS CITY TREASURER'S SALE AND COLLECTION ACT Act of Oct. 11, 1984, P.L. 876, No. 171 AN ACT

FORECLOSURE SALES. Eagle County Public Trustee Karen Sheaffer

Community Associations & Maryland's New Stormwater Fees

.:Foreclosure Timeline:.

NEW LEGISLATION 2017 Oregon Land Title Association Summary of Bills of Particular Interest to Title Companies

Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Fund

Additional senior homestead exemption.

S 2613 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

SENATE STAFF ANALYSIS AND ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT

Carolina supreme court temporarily bars foreclosures/

January 2018 longandfoster.com

Affidavit Rerecorded Lost Assignment Affidavit Agreement A document in which two or more parties All Persons Signing All Persons Signing None None

Georgia 2015 Legislation as of May 25, 2015

First Name Last Name Phone County County Judging Preference 4-H Or Open Class Judging Preference

Assembly Bill No. 140 Committee on Commerce and Labor

Legislative Update -Course Overview

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 HOUSE BILL 174 RATIFIED BILL

A Model Ordinance Establishing a Local Government Tax Deferral Program for Recreational and Commercial Working Waterfront Properties

March 20, TO: All MAAO Members FROM: MAAO President Stephen C. Behrenbrinker, CAE, RE: MAAO-DOR Foreclosure Advisory Document

CHAPTER Council Substitute for House Bill No. 643

AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT

AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING BOARD OF DIRECTORS RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT

UNREPORTED IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND. No SEPTEMBER TERM, 2014

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY 11-01

Qualified PG, St. Marys 12 Lindsey Carlin Montgomery AA, Baltimore, Carroll, Frederick, Howard, Somerset

Read and Examined by Proofreaders: Proofreader. Sealed with the Great Seal and presented to the Governor, for his approval this day of at o'clock, M.

NORTH CAROLINA PLANNED COMMUNITY ACT AND CONDOMINIUM ACT Martha Walston, staff attorney January 13, 2010 (revised)

CHAPTER Senate Bill No. 1986

AN ACT. The General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania hereby enacts as follows:

8/1/2016 Act of Oct. 24, 2012,P.L. 1239, No. 153 Cl. 68 REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY (68 PA.C.S.) CREATION OF LAND BANKS FOR THE CONVERS

Summary of Sub SB 172 Modifying Ohio laws governing land reutilization programs and property tax foreclosures of abandoned lands

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 331

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2010 Session

Maryland Scenic Byways Resource Protection Methodology Sustaining the road less traveled

Department of Legislative Services

2017 Legislative Update

COUNTY LAND REUTILIZATION CORPORATION. Summary of Ohio Statutory Foreclosure Proceedings

Distribution of Sale Proceeds. Distribution of Sale Proceeds [p. 788] Distribution: Nonjudicial Sale. Distribution: Nonjudicial Sale

Massachusetts Collectors & Treasurers School August 15, Tax Title Assignments Under MGL Ch. 60, Sections 2C & 52.

Tax Title Foreclosure Overview Presenters Jeffery D. Ugino, Esq. Olga Bagnel, Esq. July 9, 2015

NORTH CAROLINA POWER OF SALE FORECLOSURE ABSTRACT - LONG FORM

COMBINED NOTICE OF SHERIFF S SALE OF REAL PROPERTY AND RIGHT TO CURE AND REDEEM #

Foreclosure and Blighted Property: Tools for Municipal Officials

Monday, August 28, :00 a.m.

Uniform Assignment of Rents Act

RULES OF DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE VEHICLE SERVICES DIVISION CHAPTER TITLES TABLE OF CONTENTS

Delmarva Outlook 2015

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2007 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 429

SENATE BILL 794. By Dickerson BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE:

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/07/ :02 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 68 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/07/2017

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2009

Registration must be received by Thursday, June 14, 2018 at 4:30 p.m. The following documents are required to register for the tax sale:

Real Estate Foreclosure & Loss Mitigation

Tax Sale Information

CITY OF COLLEGE PARK NEW NEIGHBOR HOMEOWNERSHIP GRANT PROGRAM

Report to the General Assembly on Implementation of Senate Bill 236, the Sustainable Growth and Agricultural Preservation Act of 2012

SENATE BILL lr3298 CF HB 78 A BILL ENTITLED. Condominiums and Homeowners Associations Payments Under Protest

Sec DEFINITIONS. In this chapter:

Senate Bill No. 301 Senator Smith

Department of the Environment

Referred to Committee on Taxation. SUMMARY Revises provisions governing the collection of delinquent property taxes. (BDR )

Present: Hassell, C.J., Lacy, Keenan, Koontz, Kinser, and Lemons, JJ., and Carrico, S.J.

JULIE DAUGHERTY P. O. Box 217 Indianola, IA Phone 515/ Fax 515/

MARYLAND CIRCUIT COURT JUDICIAL LAW CLERK & INTERN POSITIONS Updated November 13, 2017 APPROXIM NUMBER OF LAW CLERK POSITIONS AVAILABLE **

Directory of Judges Maryland Orphans Court

OFFICE OF SHELBY COUNTY TREASURER 612 COURT ST. P.O. BOX 110 HARLAN, IA 51537

NC General Statutes - Chapter 47F 1

HOUSE BILL lr0177

Transcription:

Department of Legislative Services Maryland General Assembly 2012 Session SB 123 FISCAL AND POLICY NOTE Revised Senate Bill 123 (Chair, Judicial Proceedings Committee)(By Request - Departmental - Assessments and Taxation) Judicial Proceedings Environmental Matters Real Property - Foreclosure Sale of Residential Property - Notice to Local Supervisor of Assessments This departmental bill requires a purchaser of residential property sold in an action to foreclose a mortgage or deed of trust on the property to provide a copy of the court order ratifying the foreclosure sale to the supervisor of assessments for the county in which the residential property is located. The copy must be provided by the later of (1) 60 days after the entry of the court order ratifying the foreclosure sale; or (2) if a motion to alter a judgment is made before expiration of the aforementioned 60 days, 30 days after the entry of a court order that resolves the motion without nullifying the ratification order. The bill requires the supervisor of assessments to provide a receipt to the person providing a copy of the ratification order. If a copy of the ratification order is not provided to the supervisor of assessments, any reduction in property tax received by the residential property because of its status as an owner-occupied principal residence (from the date of the entry of the ratification order until the earlier of either the receipt of this order by the supervisor or the recordation of the deed transferring the property to a third party) remains due and collectable as a property tax. The bill takes effect June 1, 2012, and applies to all taxable years beginning after June 30, 2012. Fiscal Summary State Effect: Potentially significant special fund revenue increase in FY 2013 and subsequent years due to the more efficient removal of the Homestead Tax Credit (tax credit) on foreclosed residential properties. No impact on expenditures.

Local Effect: Potentially significant increase in local property tax revenues in FY 2013 and subsequent years due to the more efficient removal of the tax credit on foreclosed residential properties. No impact on expenditures. Small Business Effect: The State Department of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT) has determined that this bill has minimal or no impact on small business (attached). Legislative Services concurs with the assessment. (The attached assessment does not reflect amendments to the bill.) SB 123/ Page 2 Analysis Bill Summary: The bill does not apply if an instrument of writing transferring the residential property has been recorded in the appropriate county land record office before the expiration of the aforementioned time periods. Additionally, the bill does not apply if the foreclosure sale is subject to a pending appeal of the ratification order, a bankruptcy stay, or an unexpired right of redemption in favor of the United States or any agency or department of the United States. Current Law: No title to property acquired at a foreclosure sale is invalid because the property was purchased by the secured party, his or her assignee, or representative, or for his or her account. Post-sale Procedures: Under the Maryland Rules, a person authorized to make a foreclosure sale must file with the court, within 30 days after the sale, a complete report of the sale and an affidavit of the fairness of the sale and the truth of the report. In addition, the purchaser must file an affidavit setting forth whether the purchaser is acting as an agent and, if so, information regarding the principals and stating that the purchaser has not directly or indirectly discouraged anyone from bidding for the property. A party and a holder of a subordinate interest in the property subject to the lien in an action to foreclose a lien may file exceptions to the sale within 30 days after receiving notice. The court must then ratify the sale if (1) the time for filing exceptions has expired and either no exceptions were filed or exceptions were filed but overruled; and (2) the court is satisfied that the sale was fairly and properly made. If the court is not satisfied that the sale was fairly and properly made, it may enter any order that it deems appropriate. After the court has ratified the sale and the purchase money has been paid, the individual making the sale must convey the property to the purchaser or the purchaser s assignee. Recordation of Deed: Generally no deed may pass or take effect unless it is executed and recorded. No deed, mortgage, or deed of trust may be recorded unless it meets the requirements specified by statute relating to form, necessary attached documents, and

payment of taxes. Included in the necessary attached documents must be a copy of the deed for the submission to SDAT. The supervisor of assessments must transfer ownership of property in the assessment records upon receipt of this copy of the deed. The proper jurisdiction for recording all deeds is the county in which the land is located. If the land is located in more than one county, the deed must be recorded in all such counties. After any document has been recorded in one county, a certified copy of the recorded document may be recorded in any other county. Background: The Homestead Tax Credit Program provides tax credits against State, county, and municipal real property taxes for owner-occupied residential properties for the amount of real property taxes resulting from an annual assessment increase that exceeds a certain percentage or cap in any given year. The State requires the cap on assessment increases to be set at 10% for State property tax purposes; however, local governments have the authority to set their caps between 0% and 10%. A majority of local subdivisions have assessment caps below 10%: 20 counties in fiscal 2011 and 2012, and 21 counties in fiscal 2013. Exhibit 1 lists county assessment caps for 2013, the number of homestead accounts, and the average tax credit for a property. Two counties (Prince George s and Queen Anne s) raised the assessment cap for fiscal 2013, while one county (Wicomico) lowered the assessment cap. The Homestead Tax Credit Program is administered as follows: Increases in property assessments are equally spread out over three years. For example, if a property s assessment increased by $120,000, from $300,000 to $420,000, the increase would be phased in through increments of $40,000 annually for the next three years. If the assessment cap were set at 10%, however, the amount of assessment subject to taxes would increase by only $30,000 in the first year, $33,000 in the following year, and $36,300 in the third year. Since the assessment cap was set lower than the actual market increase, the homeowner does not have to pay taxes on the property s full assessed value. SB 123/ Page 3

FY 2013 Assessment Cap Exhibit 1 County Homestead Tax Credit Statistics County** Average Gain Per Credit Removed State** Average Gain Per Credit Removed Average County Homesteads Credit* Allegany 7% 3,632 $9,635 $95 $11 Anne Arundel 2% 114,129 108,567 988 122 Baltimore City 4% 92,149 46,929 1,064 53 Baltimore 4% 147,253 40,755 448 46 Calvert 10% 452 34,774 310 39 Caroline 5% 3,632 26,423 230 30 Carroll 5% 8,916 19,660 202 22 Cecil 8% 946 19,067 179 21 Charles 7% 2,362 20,404 218 23 Dorchester 5% 4,670 26,260 256 29 Frederick 5% 10,775 19,630 209 22 Garrett 5% 5,019 23,985 237 27 Harford 5% 3,088 14,328 149 16 Howard 5% 42,874 46,133 530 52 Kent 5% 3,401 58,616 599 66 Montgomery 10% 7,659 29,324 281 33 Prince George s 4% 120,783 45,480 600 51 Queen Anne s 5% 7,811 53,337 452 60 St. Mary s 5% 16,371 44,610 382 50 Somerset 10% 457 20,948 185 23 Talbot 0% 9,411 222,961 999 250 Washington 5% 9,802 17,983 170 20 Wicomico 5% 873 14,441 111 16 Worcester 3% 10,622 50,552 354 57 Total 627,087 *Represents the difference between a house s true assessed value and the value with an assessment cap. **Represents the amount the county or State gains if a house with an average homestead credit loses the credit. Source: State Department of Assessments and Taxation, Department of Legislative Services Real estate-owned (REO) property is property acquired by a secured party as a result of an unsuccessful foreclosure sale on the property. This acquisition occurs when the amount of the outstanding loan owed to the secured party is greater than the value of the property. In Maryland, 10,607 properties were bought by a secured party after a foreclosure auction in 2010. Six jurisdictions (Prince George s, Baltimore, Montgomery, Anne Arundel, and Frederick counties and Baltimore City) represented approximately SB 123/ Page 4

77% of all lender purchases. Exhibit 2 shows the number of REO purchases in each Maryland jurisdiction in 2010. Often when a secured party has acquired the property after a foreclosure sale, it delays the recording of the deed until it sells the property to another party, thus avoiding the payment of any recordation fee or transfer tax until absolutely necessary. When it does sell the property, the financial institution will record the deed twice and pay the transfer taxes twice: once for the transfer between the foreclosed-on property owner and the financial institution and again for the transfer between the financial institution and the new purchaser. Exhibit 2 2010 REO Purchases in Maryland Jurisdictions by Quarter Jurisdiction Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Allegany 14 17 10 15 Anne Arundel 136 211 157 179 Baltimore 239 272 281 280 Baltimore City 582 285 390 454 Calvert 29 25 24 51 Caroline 13 16 10 17 Carroll 22 33 32 29 Cecil 31 13 25 24 Charles 66 96 79 96 Dorchester 20 18 21 17 Frederick 130 152 152 111 Garrett 7 10 5 7 Harford 46 77 105 48 Howard 47 54 44 30 Kent 11 6 8 6 Montgomery 356 594 312 243 Prince George s 588 596 783 776 Queen Anne s 23 31 11 33 St. Mary s 35 36 27 23 Somerset 10 18 12 17 Talbot 4 7 11 6 Washington 114 91 84 80 Wicomico 36 42 33 27 Worcester 33 40 52 38 Total 2,592 2,740 2,668 2,607 Source: Department of Housing and Community Development SB 123/ Page 5

According to SDAT, this delay in recording the transfer of the deed causes many foreclosed residential properties to improperly retain tax credits because SDAT traditionally uses the recordation of a deed in the land records to determine whether to remove the tax credit. Property owned by a financial institution does not qualify for the tax credit because the property must be the owner s primary residence. State Fiscal Effect: By requiring the secured party to provide the court order ratifying the sale directly to the supervisor of assessments within the specified time periods, SDAT will remove the tax credit regardless of whether the secured party records the deed. When the tax credit is removed, the property is taxed on its full value and not at the value capped by the credit. A more efficient removal of the tax credit will increase property tax special fund revenues. However, the amount of increase in property tax revenues is not quantifiable at this time because the property value for each house with an improper tax credit is unknown. Exhibit 1 shows the amount that the State gains if a house with an average tax credit loses the credit. However, this cannot be used to calculate the increase in property taxes because it includes all houses in the county and not solely REO properties. Local Fiscal Effect: A more efficient removal of the tax credit will increase property tax revenue for local jurisdictions. The amount of increase in property tax revenues is not quantifiable at this time because the property value for each house with an improper tax credit is unknown. Carroll County notes that the potential increase is likely minimal because the average amount of the tax credit has dropped significantly in recent years due to stagnant property values. Cecil County also estimates a minimal increase in the tax revenues because the county already tracks foreclosures closely in order to remove the tax credit. Each of these jurisdictions has a small number of REO properties. For a jurisdiction such as Baltimore City or Prince George s County, the increase in revenue may be significant given the exceptionally high number of REO properties. Exhibit 1 shows the amount that the local government gains if a house with an average tax credit loses the credit. However, this cannot be used to calculate the increase in property taxes because it includes all houses in the county and not solely REO properties. Additional Information Prior Introductions: None. Cross File: None. Information Source(s): Baltimore, Carroll, Cecil, Harford, Montgomery, and St. Mary s counties; State Department of Assessments and Taxation; Maryland SB 123/ Page 6

Foreclosure Task Force; Judiciary (Administrative Office of the Courts); Department of Legislative Services Fiscal Note History: First Reader - February 6, 2012 mlm/kdm Revised - Senate Third Reader - March 28, 2012 Analysis by: Michael F. Bender Direct Inquiries to: (410) 946-5510 (301) 970-5510 SB 123/ Page 7

SB 123/ Page 8

ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC IMPACT ON SMALL BUSINESSES TITLE OF BILL: Real Property Purchase of Residential Property by Secured Party Notice to Local Supervisor of Assessments BILL NUMBER: SB 123 PREPARED BY: Department of Assessments and Taxation PART A. ECONOMIC IMPACT RATING This agency estimates that the proposed bill: X WILL HAVE MINIMAL OR NO ECONOMIC IMPACT ON MARYLAND SMALL BUSINESS OR WILL HAVE MEANINGFUL ECONOMIC IMPACT ON MARYLAND SMALL BUSINESSES PART B. ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SB 123/ Page 9