EVALUATION OF THE BUR K E-G I LM A N TRAIL'S EFFECT ON PROPERTY VALUES AND CRIME. Executive Summary SEATTLE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

Similar documents
Research Report. The Housing Corporation and Communities and Local Government Panel Survey 7

Residential New Construction Attitude and Awareness Baseline Study

Residential New Construction Attitude and Awareness Baseline Study

2019 Profile of Home Staging

5. PROPERTY VALUES. In this section, we focus on the economic impact that AMDimpaired

Chapter 12 Changes Since This is just a brief and cursory comparison. More analysis will be done at a later date.

8Land Use. The Land Use Plan consists of the following elements:

ARLA Survey of Residential Investment Landlords

ROCKIES REALTY BANFF/CANMORE

THE EFFECT OF PROXIMITY TO PUBLIC TRANSIT ON PROPERTY VALUES

RBC-Pembina Home Location Study. Understanding where Greater Toronto Area residents prefer to live

University of Huddersfield Repository

Courtesy Officer Job Description (Sample, Revise as needed)

Individual Property Report. Cambooya Toowoomba, QLD 4358, Australia

III. Housing Profile and Analysis

Trends. Trends in Condominiums, Co-Ops and PUDs. Condominium Summary

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases One Year Report

7224 Nall Ave Prairie Village, KS 66208

ANNEXURE A CRIME PREVENTION IN NEIGHBOURHOODS CHECKLIST

Sales of intermediate housing

Appendix A. Factors Affecting City Current Expenditures

APPENDIX A FACTORS INFLUENCING COUNTY FINANCES

Re-sales Analyses - Lansink and MPAC

Appendix A. Factors Affecting City Expenditures

GUIDE TO OWNING A HOME WITH HABITAT FOR HUMANITY

APPENDIX A FACTORS INFLUENCING CITY FINANCES

The Coldwell Banker Carlson Real Estate Market Report

ARLA Members Survey of the Private Rented Sector

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eleven-Year Report

A GUIDE TO SELLING YOUR PROPERTY

Landlords Report. Changes, trends and perspectives on the student rental market.

Berkeley, California. Not everyone is happy when the post office closes, but you must be prepared.

Urban Land Use. Unit 4 GEO22F PB

The Seattle MD Apartment Market Report

Planning for Licensed Premises

Lathrop Homes Riverworks Survey Response Percentages

Brad Mertz; and Craig Huff. Director Fred Aegerter; Planner Laura Boyd; Planner Brandon Snyder and Secretary Darlene Gray

2012 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Texas Report

Math 11 Essentials -- TEST -- Chapter 4 -- Renting an Apartment Name: 1. Match each of the following terms to its correct description.

2013 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Metro Indianapolis Report

University Gables Gazette Summer 2017 Issue

Settlement Pattern & Form with service costs analysis Preliminary Report

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS SAFETY SURVEY SURVEY FINDINGS

METROPOLITAN TRACT PERFORMANCE REPORT For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2007

11031 WOODINVILLE DR.

Residential December 2009

Hennepin County Economic Analysis Executive Summary

Outstanding Achievement In Housing In Wales: Finalist

Why Kevo? Information About The Company And Frequently Asked Questions

CONTENTS. Executive Summary 1. Southern Nevada Economic Situation 2 Household Sector 5 Tourism & Hospitality Industry

PROJECT DESCRIPTION STATION 1300

The 6th and Woodland Building

Residential Flat Lease Extensions Information for Leaseholders on Extending Your Lease

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FENTON SEWER SYSTEM FINANCIAL OVERVIEW MARCH, 2018

things to consider if you are selling your house

Annual Market Report for 2010 for Naples, Bonita, Estero market area

San Fernando Valley multifamily market

The Impact of Deep Tunnels on Property Value

Texas State Affordable Housing Corporation

THE REAL ESTATE BOARD OF NEW YORK REAL ESTATE BROKER CONFIDENCE INDEX THIRD QUARTER 2014

BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CASE SUMMARY FOR VARIANCE REQUEST. 325 Veterans Road

5-1 L ECTURE LAUNCHER PAGES PAGES

ASSESSORS ANSWER FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT REAL PROPERTY Assessors Office, 37 Main Street

VI. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY

Office Stays Positive

THE REAL ESTATE BOARD OF NEW YORK

Orange County Housing Report: I m Going to Wait to Buy. October 8, Good Afternoon!

DO YOU RENT? A Guide to Residential Tenancies in Nova Scotia

2013 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Texas Report

2017 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers

Panama City Beach Fire Service Assessment Information

Financial Impact Statement There are no immediate financial impacts associated with the adoption of this report.

CHAPTER 7 HOUSING. Housing May

Community Dev. Coord./Deputy City Recorder

OFF-CAMPUS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES. Updated December 2nd, 2015

Proposal to Establish a Vacant Property Inventory and Early Warning Database. in Jamestown, New York. Jamestown Renaissance Corporation April 2012

FAQs (Frequently Asked Questions) August 2011

29 BARSTOW ROAD POLITAN

2012 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers New Jersey Report

Dispute Resolution Services

City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents

2012 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Florida Report

Planning Commission April 23, 2008 Minutes

Research report Tenancy sustainment in Scotland

Community Opinion Surveys

Waterfront Luxury at Harborside Old Town, Alexandria. mcenearney.com

MHC 2012 Housing Tax Credit Cycle MARKET STUDY GUIDE

ACT 425 AGREEMENTS: CAN THEY WORK FOR YOU? LAW, WEATHERS & RICHARDSON, P.C. 333 Bridge Street, NW, Suite 800 Grand Rapids, MI (616)

Fremont Triplex. Licton Springs APARTMENTS :: FINANCIAL SUMMARY 520 N 47TH ST. Value-Add 3 Units or Development Site Seattle, Washington

Texas State Affordable Housing Corporation

The 2008 National Association of REALTORS Profile of International Home Buying Activity

REAL ESTATE MARKET OVERVIEW 1 st Half of 2015

CAAR Market Report 2010 Mid-Year Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS

Contents. off the fence. It s a good life!

Making Your Dream Home Wish List

2018 Member Profile Charlotte Regional REALTOR Association Report

LONG ISLAND CITY AND ASTORIA LIC AND ASTORIA ORANGE REPORT MODERN SPACES BROOKLYN 135 KENT AVENUE BROOKLYN, NY 11211

How to Use the After Repaired Value Calculator

Table of Contents. Since 1919

Opening doors for you...

Transcription:

EVALUATION OF THE BUR K E-G I LM A N TRAIL'S EFFECT ON PROPERTY VALUES AND CRIME Executive Summary SEATTLE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT OFFICE FOR PLANNING MAY 1987

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to determine what effect, if any, the Burke Gilman Trail has had on property values and crime rates of property owners near and adjacent to the trail. The need for the study became apparent when property owners in a different area of the city expressed concern over the development of a new trail project on the basis that it might reduce their. property values, increase crime, and generally reduce the quality of li'fe. These concerns are similar to concerns raised by property owners who bought their homes prior to the construction of the Burke-Gilman Trail. TRAIL PROFILE The Burke Gilman Trail is a 12.1 mile (9.85 miles are in Seattle) multipurpose trail that follows an abandoned railroad right-of-way. Most of the trail passes through residential neighborhoods. In Seattle, there are 152 single-fami ly homes and 607 condominiums immediately adjacent to the trail, and 320 single-family homes within one block of the trail. The trail also passes through an i ndustri a1 area, several. neighborhood commerical areas, the University of Washington, and links six different parks. The trail was constructed in 1978 and has about three quarters of a million users per year. METHODOLOGY Data was collected via telephone by interviewing residents near and adjacent to the trail, real estate agents who buy and sell homes near the trail, and police officers who patrol neighborhoods adjacent to the trai 1. Residents were asked questions regarding: their decision to buy their home; what effect they thought the trail would have on selling their home; what problems, if any, they have had with break-ins and vandalism by trail users; and how the trail has affected their overall quality of life. Real estate agents were asked similar questions on how the trail affects the selling price of homes along the trail. In addition, police officers were asked questions regarding t rai 1 users breaki ng i nto and vandal izi ng homes. A bi -weekly survey of newspaper real estate advertisements and real estate magazi nes was a1 so conducted to determi ne whether homes were being advertised as being near or on the Burke-Gilman Trail. An attempt was made to compare the selling prices and assessed values of homes along the trail with homes in comparable neighborhoods. However, due to the many variables that determine the value of a home, it was impossible to isolate the trail as a determinant of increased or decreased home value using this method. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: Property near but not immediately adjacent to the Burke-Gilman Trail is significantly easier to sell and, according to real estate agents, sells for an 1

average of six percent more as a result of its proximity to the trail. Property immediately adjacent to the trail, however, is only slightly easier to sell, and sells for zero to 1/2 of one percent more. Residents who bought their homes after the trail was opened are most likely to view the trail as a positive factor that increases the value of their home. Longtime residents who bought their homes prior to the opening of the trail are generally less likely to view the trail as an economic asset. Real estate advertisements that promote properties as being on or near the trail tend to be from the companies that reyularly sell homes near the trail. In other words, people who have recently been involved in the real estate market near the trail are more likely to have experienced the economic assets of the trail. Homes immediately adjacent to the trail did not experience an increase in burylaries and vandalism as a result of the trail. In the eight years the trail has been open, there has been an average of two incidences of vandalism or break-ins per year where a trail user was thought to be involved. This is well below the neighborhood average, which would expect about five incidents per year, given the number of homes along the trail. Police officers interviewed stated that there was not a greater incidence of burglaries and vandalism of homes along the trail. They attributed that fact to the absence of motor vehicles. The police officers said that there would be no significant trail problems as long as parking lots were away from the trail and bo1 1 ards prevented motor vehi cl e use. Not a single resident surveyed felt the trail should be closed. Less than three percent said there were any problems associated with the trail that were serious enough to cause them to consider moving. Almost two-thirds of the residents felt the trail increased the quality of life in the neiyhborhood. Two of the residents surveyed indicated that they had been leaders in the group opposing the trail, and that they now believe the trail is the best thing that has happened to the neighborhood. One point of concern regarding the trail must be mentioned. Although not included in the survey, thirteen percent of those surveyed brought up the problem of user conflicts (i.e., speeding bicyclists) on the trail. To some extent it is a problem of success. The trail has twice as many users as had been ori gi nal ly forecasted. Sol vi ng thi s probl em may requi re t rai 1 desi gn changes, educati ny users, and enforcing trai 1 regul ati ons. 2

~! ', SURVEY OF RESIDENTS WHO OWN SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ADJACENT TO TRAIL 1. If you were to sell your home today, do you think being near the Burke-Gi lman Trai 1 would a. make the home easier to sell b. make the home more difficult to sell c. have no effect on selling the home 2. If you were to sell your home today, do you think being near the Burke-Gi lman Trai 1 would a. make the home sell for more b. make the home sell for less c. have no effect on the selling price of the home 3. When you bought your home, did the Burke-Gilman Trail a. b. c. d. positively influence your decision to buy your home cause some misgivings about buying your home have no effect on your decision to buy your home owned home prior to construction of trail 100% - 90 a0 70 60 50 40 30 43.9 ^t! 13.0 i 7 28.0 46.4 20 10 0 a b c d a b c d a b c d QUESTION 1 QUESTION 2 QUESTION 3 Key: - -1 RESIOENTS ADJACENT TO TRAIL WHO BOUGHT PROPERTY PRIOR TO TIME TRAIL WAS OPENED. RESIDENTS AOJACENT TO TRAIL WHO BOUGHT PROPERTY AFTER TRAIL WAS OPENED.

SURVEY OF CONDOMINIUMS ADJACENT TO TRAIL 1. If you were to sell your condominium today, do you think being near the Burke-Gilman Trai 1 would a. make the condo easier to sell b. make the condo more difficult to sell c. have no effect on selliny the condo 2. If you were to sell your condominium today, do you think beiny near the Burke-tii lman Trai 1 would a. make the condo sell for more b. make the condo sell for less c. have no effect on the selling price of the condo 3. When you bought your condominium, did the Burke-Gilman Trail a. b. c. d. positively influence your decision to buy your condo cause some misgivings about buying your condo have no effect on your decision to buy your condo owned condo prior to construction of trail 90 80 70 60 57.0 a b c d ' a b c d a b c a QUESTlON 1 QUESTlON 2 QUESTION 3

SURVEY OF RESIDENTS WHO OWN SINGLE FAMILY HOMES WITHIN ONE BLOCK OF TRAIL 1. If you were to sell your home today, do you think being near the Burke-Gi lman Trai 1 would a. make the home easier to sell b. make the home mre difficult to sell. c. have no effect on sel li ng the home 2. If you were to sell your home today, do you think being near the Burke-Gi lman Trai 1 would a. make the home sell for more b. make the home sell for less c. have no effect on the selling price of the home d, do not know 3. When you bought your home, did the Burke-Gilman Trail a. b. c. d. positively influence your decision to buy your home cause some misgivings about buying your home have no effect on your decision to buy your home owned home prior to construction of trail 100% 85.4 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 QUESTION 1 QUESTION 2 QUESTION 3 Key:.'--VR-T A RESIOENTS ADJACENT TO TRAIL WHO BOUGHT PROPERTY PRIOR TO TIME TRAIL W AS OPENED. RESIDENTS ADJACENT TO TRAIL WHO BOUGHT PROPERTY AFTER TRAIL WAS OPENED.

SURVEY OF REAL ESTATE AGENTS 1. If a home is immediately adjacent to the Burke-Gilman Trail, the trail will a. make the home easier to sell b. make the home more difficult to sell c. have no effect on selling the home 2. If a home is immediately adjacent to the Burke-Gilrnan Trail, the trail will a. make the home sell for more b. make the home sell for less c. have no effect on the selliny price of the home How much more or less? (want 56) (see paye -) Average = +0.47-!, 3. If a home is within two blocks of the Burke-Gilman Trail, immediately adjacent to the trail, the trail.will a. make the home easier to sell b. make the home more difficult to sell c. have no effect on selling the home 4. If a home is within two blocks of the Burke-Gilman Trail, immediately adjacent to the trail, the trail will a. make the home sell for more b. make the home sell for less c. have no effect on the selling price of the home How much more or less? (want %) (see page ) Average = ~5.2% but but not not QUESTION 1 QUESTION 3 QUESTION 2 QUESTION 4

SAMPLE ADVERTISEMENTS (See Appendix for Additional Ads.) HOME ALONG TRAIL HOME NEAR TRAIL b 1. :,....... :..... -..I '-... -.--....- CEOAR PARK $139.950 Close in N Seattle locatlon adjoining the Burke-Gilman Trail with full Lake Washington views. Ideal family or shared living w/4+ bdrms. 3 baths, 2 frpls.!ec rrn & full length entertainment deck. Call Jon Beahm, 527-5250. Date: Mar. Source: FORUM ' 28 - April IO VALHALLA tioasw View of Wayne Golf Course. Outstanding value. Loveiy neighborhood. Family room off kitchen plus rec room. Community pool. Convenient to Burke-Gilman Trail. Sonia aartel. 482-3503 or 527-1777, I 1 Date: Mar. 28 - April 10 Source: FORUM CONDOMINIUM ALONG TRAIL APARTMENT NEAR TRAIL,.., FAIRWAY ESTATES ' tl65.ow Proiessionally decorated unit with view overlooklng Lake Wasnington & Cascaoes. Wet bar & fireplace for elegant entertaining. Sauna. pool. rec room AGilman trail at me door. Laureinurst Office. 5256571. ~~ EIGHT UNIT APARTMENT near UW. BURKE GIL,MAN TRAIL parking in rear. Updated and aiways rented. waiting list. prime rents & neignborhood. NEVER VACANT. 5239.950. 543-1 046 Date: June 6 -# June 19 Source: HOMES 8i LAND OF SEATTLE & SNOHOMISH COUNTY

SURVEY OF RESiDENTS WHO O AN SINGLE FAHILY HOIIES ADJACE:iT TO TRAIL Question #l: To the best of your knowledge a. Has a trail user ever broken into your home? E Yes E 210 b. (if yes) How often? (see paye 1 c. What was stolen? Hhat other dainaije occurren? (s2e page Results: Out of a total of 1lU residents surveyed, five of the resid nts saia th.-, most probably, a -- trail user had broken into their home at one time durinc; the 8 years the trail has been open. Two of the residents indicactd c9ac their home had been broken into twice. Hence, there has been a total of 7 break-ins during the 8 years the trail has been open. This is 4.5 percent of the residents surveyed. Ouestion #2: To the best of your knowledge a. Has a trail user ever vandalized your proper:,:/? 7 Yes NO b. (i f yes) How often? (see page c. What damage occurred? (see page 1 Results: Out of a total of 110 residents surveyed, four of the resi62nts said that, most probably, a trail user had vandalized their Jroperzy at one time during the 8 years the trail has been open. One of the residents indicated that their property had been vandalized txice. Henct, ther? has Seen a :oca1 of 5 incidents of vandalism during the eight years the ;rail nas been open. Only 3.5% of the residents indicated that their?roperc,y had 3een vandalized.

SURVEY OF RESIDENTS WHO OWN SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ADJACENT TO TRAIL 3. Have you ever made any efforts to a. Keep trail users off your property? b. (if yes) How did you do it? (see page. ) c. Has it been successful? a Yes No 4. Are there are problems caused by the trail that a. are serious enough to cause you to consider moving? a Yes No (if yes) What are the problems? (see page ) b. are serious enough that you would like to see the t rai 1 cl osed? Yes NO 5. In general, do you feel that the presence of the Burke-Gilman Trail has a. increased the quality of life in the neighborhood b. decreased the quality of life in the neighborhood c. had no effect on the quality of life in the neighborhood 100% 90 a0 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 QUESTlON 3 QUESTION 4 QUESTION 5.: Key: --- RESIDEHTS ADJACENT TO TRAIL WHO BOUGHT i PROPERTY PRIOR TO TIME TRAIL WAS OPENED. RESIDENTS ADJACENT TO TRAIL WHO BOUGHT PROPERTY AFTER TRAIL WAS OPENED.