Foreclosures Part 2:

Similar documents
Neighborhood Stabilization Program

TIF Scattered Site Housing Rehabilitation Program Request for Qualifications Information Meeting

January 1, 2012 thru March 31, 2012 Performance Report

July 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report

Disposition Strategies

Montgomery County, Ohio NSP Amendments Submitted June 18, 2010

Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) A Briefing To The Housing Committee November 17, 2008

January 1, 2015 thru March 31, 2015 Performance Report

January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report

CITY OF AURORA. and Neighborhood Stabilization Program

October 1, 2016 thru December 31, 2016 Performance

January 1, 2013 thru March 31, 2013 Performance Report

Using NSP to Preserve Affordability. March 22, 2011

July 1, 2018 thru September 30, 2018 Performance Report

CITY OF TITUSVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN

B-08-MN October 1, 2015 thru December 31, 2015 Performance. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

B-08-MN April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

Overview. Five Eligible NSP Uses. Meeting the 25% Set-Aside for Low-Income Persons

Reviewed and Approved

January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report

Chapter 4: Housing and Neighborhoods

January 1, 2017 thru March 31, 2017 Performance Report

October 1, 2011 thru December 31, 2011 Performance Report

April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report

NSP Program Overview. Daniel Blanchard COJ Management Consultant

Developing NSP Projects with Habitat Organizations

April 1, 2017 thru June 30, 2017 Performance Report

July 1, 2017 thru September 30, 2017 Performance Report

October 1, 2012 thru December 31, 2012 Performance Report

July 1, 2011 thru September 30, 2011 Performance Report

City of Chicago Affordable Housing Plan Fourth Quarter Progress Report April 8, 2010

Reviewed and Approved

Managing NSP2 Programs For Success. Key Success Factors in NSP1. Typical NSP1 Market Strategies. Lessons Learned from NSP1

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

April 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2013 Performance Report

Reviewed and Approved

October 1, 2011 thru December 31, 2011 Performance Report

Vacant Building Receivership

October 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014 Performance Report

Amendment #2. To the

Kane County Foreclosure Redevelopment Program

Jackson County Home Development Resources, Inc. Neighborhood Stabilization Program Policies and Procedures

ONE YEAR ACTION PLAN

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Meeting the 25% Set-Aside for Low-Income Persons

Models for Vacant Property Disposition and Community Stabilization

January 1, 2017 thru March 31, 2017 Performance Report

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento. City Council. October 27, 2009

April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report

Kane County Foreclosure Redevelopment Program

Reviewed and Approved

B-08-MN April 1, 2016 thru June 30, 2016 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

April 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2013 Performance Report

B-08-MN April 1, 2017 thru June 30, 2017 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report

B-11-MN April 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report

October 1, 2009 thru December 31, 2009 Performance Report

October 1, 2017 thru December 31, 2017 Performance

Guidance on Amendment Procedures Updated April 3, 2014

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

THE NSP SUBSTANTIAL AMENDMENT

Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN April 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012 Performance Report

Grantee: Broward County, FL Grant: B-08-UN April 1, 2011 thru June 30, 2011 Performance Report

January 1, 2010 thru March 31, 2010 Performance Report

October 1, 2016 thru December 31, 2016 Performance


City of Bradenton. Proposed Neighborhood Stabilization Program Plan Revised as of

PO Box 1535 Bismarck ND Attn: Jennifer Henderson

July 1, 2009 thru September 30, 2009 Performance Report

April 1, 2017 thru June 30, 2017 Performance Report

October 1, 2015 thru December 31, 2015 Performance

January 1, 2012 thru March 31, 2012 Performance Report

HOME and NSP. A Guide for Successfully and Effectively Combining Funding Sources

Reviewed and Approved

Housing Initiative Clinic Briefs

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)

Multifamily Housing For All: The Need for Affordable Housing. Solutions for an Affordable Pittsburgh

Denver Comprehensive Housing Plan. Housing Advisory Committee Denver, CO August 3, 2017

April 1, 2017 thru June 30, 2017 Performance Report

October 1, 2017 thru December 31, 2017 Performance

April 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report

January 1, 2016 thru March 31, 2016 Performance Report

July 15, 2009 Prepared by County of Lake s Federal Grants Office Tracy L. Udrija, Federal Grants Administrator

B-09-CN-CA April 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

NSP Project Feasibility Analysis Template: Instruction Manual

July 1, 2014 thru September 30, 2014 Performance Report

B-11-MN April 1, 2014 thru June 30, 2014 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

January 1, 2013 thru March 31, 2013 Performance Report

January 1, 2017 thru March 31, 2017 Performance Report

October 1, 2014 thru December 31, 2014 Performance Report

Reviewed and Approved

B-08-UN April 1, 2015 thru June 30, 2015 Performance Report. Community Development Systems Disaster Recovery Grant Reporting System (DRGR)

City of St. Petersburg, Florida Consolidated Plan. Priority Needs

NSP DEVELOPER ARRESALE PROGRAM PROCEDURES

Guidance for Habitat for Humanity Affiliates January 12, 2011

July 1, 2018 thru September 30, 2018 Performance Report

Genesee County Land Bank Authority

NSP - How Can Counties Recover from The Malaise of Homeowner Foreclosures June 16, Working Together for Stronger Communities

Submitted - Await for Review

Transcription:

April 22, 2009 Sensible Land Use Foreclosures Part 2: Brooklyn Park Foreclosure Initiatives Robert Schreier Director of Community Development City of Brooklyn Park (763) 493-8060

Overview 1. Foreclosures in Brooklyn Park 2. City foreclosure response

Brooklyn Park Foreclosures Hwy 610 2008: 983 2007: 593 2006: 315 2005: 157 Hwy 81 I-94 85 th Ave Hwy 252 Known Vacant Homes: 850

Foreclosure Impacts

Foreclosure Impacts Neighborhood blight Disinvestment Decreased property values

Foreclosure Impacts Vandalism, graffiti, theft of copper, fires Homes become unfit for habitation (lack of utilities, unsanitary conditions) Lack of winterization leads to broken water pipes Mold, electrical hazards, structural damage Takes longer to repair and longer to re-occupy General property hazards

Graffiti

Copper Theft

Junk & Debris

Fire Houses Houses in foreclosure that suffer a fire can be difficult to resolve in a quick manner. Insurance issues Multiple parties

Broken Water Pipes

Mold

Brooklyn Park Foreclosure Response

Brooklyn Park Response 1. Prevent foreclosures 2. Stabilize and preserve the city s housing stock 3. Foreclosure recovery Acquisition and rehabilitation of foreclosed homes

Foreclosure Prevention Increased Foreclosure prevention counseling through CAPSH (Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin) Renter counseling referrals to HOME Line, Legal Aid, Centro Legal Credit counseling through Lutheran Social Services 1 st time homebuyer classes through CAPSH

Foreclosure Prevention (cont.) Typical outreach City newsletter Utility bill inserts City website Brooklyn Park NOW cable show City Hall displays Special events Enhanced outreach Home Ownership Center Citywide mailing News papers Ethnic media Multicultural outreach: Leadership in diverse communities City events & festivals Faith communities

Stabilization and Preservation New code enforcement case started for each property after sheriff's sale Constant monitoring Streamlined internal processes and management Greater cross department communication Everyone knows the status of properties Better able to preserve properties (e.g. water shut-offs, nuisance abatement, etc.)

Stabilization and Preservation City Staff communicates with occupants, banks, realtors, neighbors, restoration companies, potential owners, and other city departments regarding issues unique to each property Point of Sale program est. in Fall 2007 Ensures residential property is maintained in a safe, clean, and healthy condition The Seller must complete repairs on all hazardous conditions prior to sale and non-hazardous repairs may be completed by the buyer, but must be completed within 180 days of ownership transfer

Before After

Foreclosure Recovery

Foreclosure Recovery $3.7 m Neighborhood Stabilization Program $600,000 Mn Housing Pilot Program Proposed Uses Acquisition and Rehab Demolition and redevelopment Homebuyer assistance Flexible plan -- fund most successful programs

Neighborhood Stabilization Program To use NSP money, recipients must: Target areas of greatest need Affect vacant, foreclosed, or blighted Document how meeting national objectives Document how serving at or below 50% and 120% of AMI Income verification Purchase at a discount (15% average) URA appraisal Document purchase discount Require HUD approved homebuyer counseling Document homebuyer financing used Create and enforce affordability period Meet rehabilitation standards (including lead-based paint)

Neighborhood Stabilization Program (cont.) Complete environmental review (includes historic preservation) Follow relocation and acquisition processes (notices, etc.) Meet labor standards i.e. Davis Bacon for more than 8 units Adhere to fair housing & equal opportunity laws i.e. accessibility, Section 504 Track administration costs Follow procurement (competitive bidding) Complete audit report Manage program income Manage contracts with partners Complete regular reporting and compliance monitoring

Foreclosure Recovery (cont.) Foreclosure Recovery Partners Robert Engstrom Companies Interim loans (30% of costs) Gap funding (approx. $30,000) PRG Interim loans (100% of costs) Gap funding (approx. $30,000) Rains Properties Gap funding (approx. $30,000) Other TBD??

7701 Noble Ave

Brooklyn Park Foreclosure Recovery Plan (2009) Funds required for Facilitated Recovery = $4.3 million *1,576 Foreclosed Properties Homes Near Foreclosure Foreclosure Prevention Who? What? EDA Facilitated Recovery 78 Market Recovery 1,498 EDA Staff 10 Developers Homebuyers 30 38 How? Tear Downs Acquisition, Rehab and Re-sale Home Improvement Loans Land Bank and Redevelop * Number of foreclosed properties in Brooklyn Park 2007 and 2008 Down Payment Assistance