ORDINANCE E WHEREAS, WHEREAS,

Similar documents
2030 Mobility Plan Update Working Group 2/21/18

Sec Definitions. [Note: the long list of definitions related to Mobility will appear in the Handbook.]

COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY ( C-PACE ) AGREEMENT

COMMERCIAL PROPERTY ASSESSED CLEAN ENERGY ( C-PACE ) AGREEMENT

RECITALS. WHEREAS, the GMA requires counties to adopt county-wide planning policies in cooperation with cities within the County; and

ASSUMPTION OF HOUSING CHOICE RENTAL ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT

Goals and Policies Concerning Use of MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982

CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE

ESCROW AGREEMENT This Escrow Agreement is made and entered into this day of, 20, by (the Company ) and. (the Escrow Agent ) and

ESCROW AGREEMENT. by and among HARBOR DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES. and. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee and as Escrow Agent

THIS IS A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT PLEASE READ CAREFULLY. Clearfield City Good Landlord Program Agreement

Senate Bill No. 301 Senator Smith

INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day of, 20, by and

UTILITY EASEMENT AGREEMENT

CITY AND COUNTY OF BROOMFIELD SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR (PROPERTY NAME - ALL CAPS)

[Letterhead of Landlord] OFFICE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO LEASE Version. [Date of agreement]

USE AGREEMENT AMONG <OWNER>, <LESSEE>, AND ORANGE COUNTY. THIS USE AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) is entered into by and among


COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL REFERRAL SALES ASSOCIATES INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

1 West Main Street -- Box 1, Fincastle, Virginia STORMWATER MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT

EASEMENT AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, Hall Brothers owns certain real property located in Weber County, Utah ( Hall Brothers Property );

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

THE TOWNHOMES AT WESTLINKS

ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT

SECTION I APPOINTMENT OF ESCROW AGENT

Memorandum of Understanding between County Board of Arlington County, Virginia and The Northern Virginia Conservation Trust

VILLAGE OF Niles Facade & Streetscape Improvement Program APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT The following includes the Façade & Streetscape Improvement

THE INTRODUCING BROKER (IB) AGREEMENT

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: December 16, 2014 AGENDA ITEM NO. 35. Public Hearing [t(" Consent Agenda D Regular Agenda D

ESCROW AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE DEFEASANCE OF PORTIONS OF

Grant Contract Specified Grants

Assignment of Leases and Rents

PACIFIC TRUST DEED SERVICING COMPANY, INC. Collection Escrow Instructions

(Ord. No , 1, )

[This entire document will be deleted and replaced with the new agreement base]

ARTICLE 18 PARK AND RECREATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES

CORPORATE SUPPLY ARRANGEMENT

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 797, TENANT SUPPORT GRANT PROGRAM. Chapter 797 TENANT SUPPORT GRANT PROGRAM

SMOKY LAKE COUNTY. Alberta Provincial Statutes

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT

ESCROW AGREEMENT. Dated as of August [ ], 2017

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER

KANSAS LLC OPERATING AGREEMENT

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 437

H.329. It is hereby enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Vermont: (a) Land which has been classified as agricultural land or managed forest

EXEMPT FROM CLERK S FEE PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION EXEMPT FROM RECORDATION TAXES PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION

CITY OF DOVER ORDINANCE # BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DOVER, IN COUNCIL MET:

Public Improvement District (PID) Policy

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

City of Dallas Historic Development Program Your guide to incentives for rehabilitating historic buildings

THE SCHOOL BOARD OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA acting as the governing body of the School District of Broward County, Florida and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSO

DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS AND COST SHARING AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA, ORDAINS that:

SUBPART B. REAL PROPERTY DISPOSITIONS

Riverside County Transportation Commission Rail Station Joint Development Guidelines June 2005

ESCROW AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE DEFEASANCE OF A PORTION OF

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

Florida Senate CS for CS for CS for SB 736

Equipment Lease Agreement Template

LIMITED FINANCIAL SERVICES AGREEMENT. THIS AGREEMENT dated for reference as of the day of, 20.

RESOLUTION NO

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 12, 2011

Resolution No. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, TEXAS: I.

Village of Morton Grove Façade Improvement Program PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT

THE CODE; PROVIDING FOR

IC Chapter 1.7. Abandoned Manufactured Homes in Mobile Home Communities

4/8/2015 Item #10E Page 1

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW

DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY

TOWN OF WOODSIDE. Report to Town Council Agenda Item 6 From: Susan George, Town Manager July 26, 2011

Appendix 'A' Bill No. By-law No

RECITALS. Page 1 of 9

1 ORDINANCE 4, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER TAXATION.

IC Application of chapter Sec. 1. This chapter applies to each unit having a commission. As added by P.L (ss), SEC.18.

POLICY. Cancels: ^ I Approved By: Mitchell Brells, P.E. DE POL ROUTING PUBLIC ROAD DRAINAGE TO PRIVATE STORMWATER SYSTEMS

HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION DUES ASSISTANCE GRANT INFORMATION, INSTRUCTIONS, APPLICATION AND AGREEMENT

THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER

GENERAL ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS. THIS GENERAL ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS is made

WATER AND WASTEWATER AGREEMENT (Individual)

TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT JEA WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS CUSTOMER OWNED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED

Multifamily Housing Revenue Bond Rules

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, periodically the Conservation, Development and Planning Department

CITY OF CALABASAS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO SPECIAL TAX REFUNDING BONDS SERIES 2006 REFUNDING ESCROW AGREEMENT

ORDINANCE NO

AFFORDABLE HOUSING SECTIONS 5.1 GENERAL GOALS

Application Packet for Fee Deferral Agreement

Improvement District (T.I.D.) Document Last Updated in Database: November 14, 2016

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 415 INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Florida Department of State, Division of Library and Information Services LIBRARY COOPERATIVE GRANT AGREEMENT

DEED RESTRICTION AGREEMENT FOR THE OCCUPANCY AND TRANSFER OF CHAMONIX VAIL RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Long Term Rental Property Management Agreement

BOONE COUNTY, MISSOURI RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT (573)

City of Philadelphia

THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

D E P A R T M E N T O F P L A N N I N G A N D D E V E L O P M E N T

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento City Council. April 18, 2017

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CONTRACT STATE OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF HILLSBOROUGH

Transcription:

SUBSTITUTED & REREFERRED // SUBSTITUTED // Introduced by Council Member Bishop and twice substituted by the Transportation, Energy and Utilities Committee: 0 ORDINANCE --E AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER (CONCURRENCY AND MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM), PART (MOBILITY FEE), ORDINANCE CODE, SECTION.0 (TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CONSTRUCTED BY A LANDOWNER OR DEVELOPER) AND SECTION.0 (MOBILITY FEE CONTRACT), TO ALLOW A LANDOWNER OR DEVELOPER TO CONSTRUCT AN APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WITHIN THE SAME MOBILITY ZONE(S) AS A PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AND RECEIVE CREDIT FOR THAT APPLICABLE PROJECT EVEN IF THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IS NOT CURRENTLY IDENTIFIED IN THE 0 MOBILITY PLAN OR IN THE 0 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR AN INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 0 WHEREAS, on September, the City Council adopted Ordinance --E which implemented the 0 Mobility Plan, after having opted out of transportation concurrency and the fair share assessment contract system by Ordinance --E on May, ; and WHEREAS, as initially adopted, Part of the Mobility Ordinance allows for a Mobility Fee Contract between a landowner or developer and the City, to memorialize an arrangement for credits as set forth in Sections.0 and. for the payment or satisfaction of the mobility fee; and

SUBSTITUTED & REREFERRED // SUBSTITUTED // 0 0 WHEREAS, as initially adopted, Section.0 limits mobility fee credits for a transportation improvement project to those identified in the 0 Mobility Plan, while other transportation improvement projects that are not currently identified in the 0 Mobility Plan that either maintain or improve the adopted City-wide and Mobility Zone minimum mobility scores or which improves mobility would not be eligible for credits; and WHEREAS, as initially adopted, Section.0 limits the amount of mobility fee credits to the mobility fee assessed and thereby does not accommodate construction of transportation improvements projects that would maintain or improve the adopted City-wide and Mobility Zone minimum mobility scores or which improves mobility; and WHEREAS, the City s review of transportation improvement projects, related mobility fee contracts and other associated traffic circulation and operational matters necessarily require the City to evaluate the impacts of proposed development(s) upon the City's overall transportation facilities, infrastructure and expenditures, including its ability to provide for and direct future growth, such considerations are legislative in nature and subject to the policy-making functions of the City Council; now therefore BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Jacksonville: Section. Amending Section.0 (Transportation improvement projects constructed by a landowner or developer), Part (Mobility Fee), Chapter (Concurrency and Mobility Management System), Ordinance Code. Section.0 (Transportation improvement projects constructed by a landowner or developer), Part (Mobility Fee), Chapter (Concurrency and Mobility Management System), Ordinance Code, is hereby amended to read as follows: CHAPTER. CONCURRENCY AND MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM - -

SUBSTITUTED & REREFERRED // SUBSTITUTED // 0 0 * * * PART. MOBILITY FEE. * * * Sec..0. - Transportation improvement projects constructed by a landowner or developer. A landowner or developer may construct, or cause to be constructed, an applicable transportation improvement project within the same Mobility Zone(s) as a proposed development and receive credit for that applicable project, as set forth herein. However, any transportation improvements and land associated with those improvements that are required for a development s minimum transportation and traffic circulation design standards applicable to the development s standard access management, pursuant to federal, state or local laws or regulations, including but not limited to the Land Development Procedures Manual, shall not be considered as applicable transportation improvements eligible for credit pursuant to this section. (a) Applicability. The following shall be considered applicable transportation improvement projects: () Project(s) identified in the 0 Mobility Plan that meet all of the following criteria: A landowner or developer may construct, or cause to be constructed, any transportation improvement project that is identified in the 0 Mobility Plan to offset a calculated mobility fee if the transportation improvement project: () Is located within the applicable Mobility Zone; (a) Using professionally accepted standards and criteria, to the satisfaction of the City, the transportation improvement project Mmaintains or improves the adopted City-wide and Mobility Zone(s) minimum - -

SUBSTITUTED & REREFERRED // SUBSTITUTED // 0 mobility score; and () Either: (i) Costs the same as the applicant s mobility fee; or (ii) Costs less than the applicant s mobility fee and the applicant pays the difference between the mobility fee and the cost of the improvement project. (b) The transportation improvement project is identified in the 0 Mobility Plan on either the (i) Prioritized Project List, (ii) Project Evaluation and Prioritization List, (iii) Committed Project List, (iv) Bicycle Mode Project Summary List or (v) Pedestrian Mode Project Summary List as set forth in Tables,,, and respectively, below. () Projects not identified in the 0 Mobility Plan for auto/truck mode(s) that meet all of the following criteria: (a) It either: (i) Maintains or improves the adopted 0 0 City-wide and Mobility Zone(s) mobility score for the auto/truck mode, as calculated by deleting the 0 Mobility Plan Prioritized Project List project set forth in Table, for such mode and substituting in its place the proposed transportation improvement project; or (ii) Improves mobility within the applicable Mobility Zone(s), as evidenced by a professional traffic study provided by the applicant which utilizes and employs professionally accepted standards and criteria, subject to the review and approval of the Planning and Development Department, and has a minimum cost of $,000,000.00, calculated using the most recent cost - -

SUBSTITUTED & REREFERRED // SUBSTITUTED // 0 estimate information issued by the Florida Department of Transportation, Office of Policy Planning regarding generic cost per mile models; (b) Meets the requirements of the 0 Mobility Plan as applicable, including the evaluation criteria set forth in Section..; (c) The City Council approves the proposed transportation improvement project; and (d) The project is adopted into the next cycle of the -year Capital Improvements Element schedule. () Projects not identified in the 0 Mobility Plan for bicycle and pedestrian mode(s) that meet all of the following criteria: (a) Improves mobility within the applicable Mobility Zone(s), beyond the minimum standards required by law for such development, as evidenced by a professional traffic study provided by the applicant which utilizes and employs professionally accepted standards and criteria, subject to the review and approval of the Planning and Development Department. The traffic study shall include and not be limited to information such as: a demonstration that the bicycle or pedestrian mode transportation improvement project improves the respective bicycle or pedestrian mode mobility within such Mobility Zone(s); documentation of existing conditions; pedestrian and bicycle counts; an assessment of the previous three year crash data including pedestrian and bicycle crashes; identification of any existing pedestrian and bicycle facilities; - -

SUBSTITUTED & REREFERRED // SUBSTITUTED // 0 (b) Meets the requirements of the 0 Mobility Plan as applicable, including the evaluation criteria set forth in Section.; (c) Connects to and compliments other available bicycle or pedestrian mode facilities, including transit access, within the Mobility Zone; (d) The City Council approves the proposed transportation improvement project; and (e) The project is adopted into the next cycle of the -year Capital Improvements Element schedule. () Projects not identified in the 0 Mobility Plan for transit mode(s) that meet all of the following criteria: (a) It either: (i) Maintains or improves the adopted 0 0 City-wide and Mobility Zone(s) mobility score for the transit mode, as calculated by deleting the 0 Mobility Plan Prioritized Project List project set forth in Table, for such mode and substituting in its place the proposed transportation improvement project; or (ii) Improves mobility within the applicable Mobility Zone(s), as evidenced by a professional traffic study provided by the applicant which utilizes and employs professionally accepted standards and criteria, subject to the review and approval of the Planning and Development Department; (b) Meets the requirements of the 0 Mobility Plan as applicable, including the evaluation criteria set forth in Section..; (c) It is reviewed and approved by the Jacksonville Transportation Authority ( JTA ); (d) The City Council approves the proposed - -

SUBSTITUTED & REREFERRED // SUBSTITUTED // 0 transportation improvement project; and (e) The project is adopted into the next cycle of the -year Capital Improvements Element schedule. Factors that the City may consider in its review of transportation improvement projects include but are not limited to the City s Multi-Modal Studies, the Comprehensive Plan, the Mobility Plan, the value of any calculated credits proposed to be issued and their relationship to the value of the proposed project s improvement of mobility, the status of existing infrastructure coupled with the needs of the City, an analysis of the proposed development and its impacts to the surrounding areas and infrastructure, and any other applicable factors in the City s determination. (b) Credit against mobility fee. () A landowner or developer who constructs, or causes to be constructed, an entire applicable transportation improvement project that is identified in the 0 Mobility Plan as authorized in subsection (a) shall receive credit against the applicable mobility fee as provided in this section for the design, permitting, and construction of the entire applicable transportation improvement project located within the same Mobility Zone or Mobility Zones as the development. () Credit may be transferred to other landowners or developers for payment of a mobility fee owed to the City for development within the same Mobility Zone(s) of Mobility Zone as the development transportation improvement project. () Credit for donated land as authorized by subsection (f), may be transferred to other landowners or developers for payment of a mobility fee. 0 (c) Calculation of Credit. - -

SUBSTITUTED & REREFERRED // SUBSTITUTED // 0 0 () The credit authorized in subsection (b) for an applicable transportation improvement project shall be calculated using the most recent cost estimates information issued by the Florida Department of Transportation, Office of Policy Planning regarding generic cost per mile models in the most recent issue of the Florida Department of Transportation, Office of Policy Planning, Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation publication entitled Transportation Costs. The cost estimates for facilities and/or projects not identified in Transportation Costs such FDOT cost estimates shall be determined by the Public Works Department, prior to the approval of any credit. () Credits authorized pursuant to this section shall be applicable to the particular mode from which the transportation improvement project was derived. () The credit authorized in subsection (f), shall be equal to the value of the eligible land donated, based on the established value by the appraisal of an MAI appraiser. The landowner or developer and the City of Jacksonville Public Works Department shall mutually agree upon the appraiser and the scope of work of the appraisal assignment prior to the appraisal being performed. The Public Works Department s agreement shall be evidenced by a memorandum or letter executed by the Real Estate Officer, applicable Division Chief or the Director of the Public Works Department. (d) Timing of credit. The costs shall be deemed incurred and credit shall be provided pursuant to this section when a contract for the construction of the entire transportation improvement project is awarded, and a payment and performance bond, or other form of security approved by the Office of General Counsel, is provided to the City to guarantee the funding of the facilities - -

SUBSTITUTED & REREFERRED // SUBSTITUTED // 0 and/or projects. The City shall be a co-obligee under the bond or other form of security. (e) Public Works Department review. All transportation improvement projects shall be approved by the Public Works Department prior to, and after construction to verify completion and fulfillment of any mobility fee requirements. (f) Right-of-way donation. A landowner or developer may receive credit in the Mobility Zone(s) for donating eligible land within the same Mobility Zone(s), if the land is necessary for a an applicable transportation improvement project identified as a prioritized transportation improvement project identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Comprehensive Plan Priority Project or a bicycle or pedestrian improvement identified in the Master Plan in the 0 Mobility Plan. However, no credit shall be given and eligibility shall not be established for the donation of any portion of land which would be required to be donated or dedicated for a development s minimum transportation and traffic circulation design standards applicable to the development s standard access management, pursuant to federal, state or local laws or regulations, including but not limited to the Land Development Procedures Manual. An appraisal shall be required for any donation of land. The landowner or developer and the City of Jacksonville Public Works Department shall mutually agree to the appraiser prior to the appraisal being performed. The Public Works Department s agreement shall be evidenced by a memorandum or letter executed by the Real Estate Officer, applicable Division Chief or Deputy Director in the Public Works Department or the Director of the Public Works Department. TABLE PRIORITIZED PROJECT LIST 0 TABLE PROJECT EVALUATION AND PRIORITIZATION LIST - -

SUBSTITUTED & REREFERRED // SUBSTITUTED // TABLE COMMITTED PROJECT LIST TABLE BICYCLE MODE PROJECT SUMMARY LIST 0 TABLE PEDESTRIAN MODE PROJECT SUMMARY LIST Section. Amending Section.0 (Mobility fee Contract), Part (Mobility Fee), Chapter (Concurrency and Mobility Management System), Ordinance Code. Section.0 (Mobility fee contract), Part (Mobility Fee), Chapter (Concurrency and Mobility Management System), Ordinance Code, is hereby amended to read as follows: CHAPTER. CONCURRENCY AND MOBILITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM * * * PART. MOBILITY FEE. * * * Sec..0. Mobility fee contract. * * * (d) After the Director has executed the Mobility Fee Contract, the CMMSO shall record a short form of the fully executed contract in the public records within five () calendar days of its receipt of same. Notwithstanding, any Mobility Fee Contract which includes any credit for any transportation improvement project not identified in the 0 Mobility Plan or in the 0 Comprehensive Plan as set forth in Section.0, Ordinance Code, shall require City Council review and approval prior to the Director executing such Mobility Fee Contract. * * * Section. Notification, Acknowledgement, Indemnification 0 and Hold Harmless Agreement. An agreement subject to the review and - 0 -

SUBSTITUTED & REREFERRED // SUBSTITUTED // 0 0 approval of the Office of General Counsel and the Planning and Development Department shall be executed by each applicant upon issuance of a mobility fee calculation certificate, calculation of credit for any transportation improvement project and execution of any related mobility fee contract which shall contain the following: (i) an acknowledgement, representation and agreement by the applicant (and their successors or assigns) that such mobility fee calculation of credit system for any transportation improvement project or any of the matters as set forth in this ordinance, or any action(s) taken by the City with respect to accomplishing same, including but not limited to pursuing and effectuating any text amendment(s) to the Comprehensive Plan or Mobility Plan, may be subject to administrative and/or court challenges or proceedings, and that upon the commencement of any such action or event the applicant (and their successors or assigns) shall be required to immediately pay to the City the full amount of the mobility fee calculated pursuant to Section.0, Ordinance Code (and any other applicable provisions), which such amount payable to the City shall include all amount(s) of any mobility fee credit(s) for any transportation improvement project(s), and in such event any mobility fee credit for any transportation improvement project(s) and any other rights or benefits related thereto, shall completely terminate and be of no further force or effect; (ii) a hold harmless and indemnification provision which sets forth that such applicant (and their successors or assigns) is solely liable for and shall indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from any and all loss, damage, action, suit, judgment, cost, fee or expense whatsoever (including but not limited to all attorney s fees and costs) related to this ordinance, and to any approvals, waivers or actions granted or taken by the City with respect to the mobility fee system (inclusive of any mobility fee calculation system of - -

SUBSTITUTED & REREFERRED // SUBSTITUTED // 0 credit for any transportation improvement project or any of the matters as set forth in this ordinance), and including but not limited to effectuating any text amendment(s) to the Comprehensive Plan or Mobility Plan, (iii) the applicant s name, contact information, the mobility fee calculation, and the mobility fee calculation of credit for any transportation improvement project amount which is to be credited pursuant to the provisions herein, and (iv) any other applicable provisions as required by the Office of General Counsel and the Planning and Development Department. This particular agreement shall no longer be required, and any existing agreements (or agreement provisions) regarding same shall automatically terminate, once all events or actions taken by the City with respect to accomplishing a mobility fee calculation of credit system for any transportation improvement project or any of the matters as set forth in this ordinance, including but not limited to effectuating any text amendment(s) to the Comprehensive Plan or Mobility Plan, have been approved, any administrative and/or court challenges or proceedings have been finalized and terminated, and any and all time periods for appeal have been completely exhausted and/or expired. Section. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective upon signature by the Mayor or upon becoming effective without the Mayor's signature. Form Approved: 0 /s/ Susan C. Grandin Office of General Counsel Legislation Prepared By: Jason R. Gabriel and Susan C. Grandin G:\SHARED\LEGIS.CC\\Sub\--E.doc - -