CITY HALL PROJECT UPDATE/DIRECTION BRIEF September 19, 2017

Similar documents
Glendale Municipal Golf Courses Glen Lakes Analysis. City Council Workshop November 13, 2018

City of Shakopee, MN. Planning Objectives: City Hall Plan Options. City Hall Plan Options

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 17, 2012

DEKALB COUNTY ENTERPRISE ZONE APPLICATION. Project Information

Hopkinton Public Library Feasibility Study

City of Stockton. Legislation Text AUTHORIZE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 501 AND 509 WEST WEBER AVENUE

Frequently Asked Questions

Item 7.1, June 29, 2004 ACQUISITION OF THE GLOBAL PHOTON PROPERTY FOR THE GUADALUPE RIVER PARK

LUCAS COUNTY. Downtown Site Analysis. 26 March 2018

Sidewalk Program Policy Revised: 06 November 13

New Police Facility Community Presentation. September 23, 2017

RECITALS STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT. Draft: November 30, 2018

Development Impact Fee Compliance Report Required Pursuant to Government Code Section 66006

A. Approval / Disapproval of Resolution No : Adopting a Fair Housing Policy.

DESIGN PUBLIC HEARING

A. Approval / Disapproval of Resolution No : Adopting a Fair Housing Policy.

Housing Program Application (HOME & HTF) County of Bucks, Pennsylvania Housing Services

MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE

CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA ANNUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT FISCAL YEAR

Funding Capital Projects: CHEFA Financed Bond Sales for Auxiliary Services Facilities FY

CHARLEBOIS FAMILY INVESTMENTS. University of Alberta

4 Questions to ask before you hire Dave Steinberg!

Wisconsin downtown action council Downtown project case study profile

Bringing Community Together Phase 2 Construction

Broadway Corridor Framework Plan Pearl District Business Association November 10, 2015

CREATIVE IDEAS. PRECISELY DELIVERED.

ARLINGTON COUNTY TENANT RELOCATION GUIDELINES

Building Re-use Presentation. A look at City Hall, the Police Station and the Briscoe Building. December 6, 2016

Potential Property Impacts Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization

LAKE MERRITT STATION AREA PLAN

Section 1. Appendix A, "Zoning" of the Code of the City of Charlotte is hereby amended as follows:

Request For Proposals RFP Date of Issue: September 15, 2015 RFP DUE ON: October 2, 2015 at 3:00pm Alaska Time THIS IS NOT AN OFFER

Planning Services/Inspections Services FY12 Budget Presentation

2019 New Homes Tour Important Dates & Contact Information

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Regular Meeting Date: April 5, 2017

A Website dedicated entirely to Selling Your Home!

Village of North Palm Beach Council Workshop February 10 and 11, 2016

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Real Estate Division. J.P. Correia Real Estate Manager. Real Estate Division

Town of Carrboro Space Planning // Town Assets

Truax Park Apartments

Upper Dublin Public Library. Master Plan Presentation for: 520 Virginia Drive

CALL FOR OFFERS / REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL

The Miramar Santa Monica

ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA

Request Conditional Use Permits (Open-Air Market, Assembly Use) Staff Planner Robert Davis

Pierson Library Project Presentation. March 10, 2015

ULI Boston Technical Assistance Panel (TAP) Program. Dedham Square

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Mitigation Program Procedural Manual

EAST CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT UPDATE Board of Trustees January 20, 2011

Expanded feasibility study for the United Nations accommodation needs

NOTICE OF REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) COMMUNITY PLACEMENT PLAN (CPP) FISCAL YEAR

GREAT FALLS HIGH SCHOOL MASTER PLAN. GFHS Master Plan Task Force

Town of Southampton - Minutes Board Meeting of April 29, Employee Retirement $ 8,000.

TORONTO COMMUNITY HOUSING - DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM Development and Redevelopment Projects Under Construction

1. INTRODUCTION 2. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND DESCRIPTION

60. ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 14, DATE: July 13, 2018

Acquisition of Warehouse at Good Luck Road

DISPOSITION OF REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY POLICY. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS a. "Land Bank" shall mean Albany County Land Bank Corporation.

Gardnerville Parking District Strategy

McCLATCHY FACILITY SUMMARIES

APPENDIX A FACTORS INFLUENCING COUNTY FINANCES

Project Description Preferred Alternative

Short Term Rentals VIRGINIA BEACH CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 7, Mark D. Stiles City Attorney

Ashland City Hall Feasibility Study City Council Presentation Monday, October 17, 2016

KERN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION

CITY OF NORTH MIAMI BEACH COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

Jefferson Street Center Winchester Public Schools Winchester, Virginia

MEMORANDUM. 1. Approve additional expenses in the amount of $29,685 for additional work on the 2015 Street Repair project;

501 Adelaide Street East: Closing Report

COLUMBIA COUNTY EVENTS CENTER PLANNING COMMITTEE REPORT (FINAL)

Real Estate Development and Reuse

Claremont Club, Spa & Residences Project Description November 22,2016

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE

HOME PROGRAM /AFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND HOUSING APPLICATION. Applicant Type Non-Profit For Profit Partnership CHDO Other.

Brownfield Plan. For the. Huron-Main Revitalization Project Huron and Grand River Avenues Port Huron, Saint Clair County, Michigan

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

Lebanon Village Center Study

SHORE DRIVE CORRIDOR: PAST, PRESENT, & FUTURE APRIL 19, 2018 BAYFRONT ADVISORY COMMISSION

Urban Redevelopment Through Adaptive Reuse: From Blight to Bright

CASCADE CHARTER TOWNSHIP 2865 Thornhills SE Grand Rapids, Michigan

STAFF REPORT FOR MONDAY, MAY 9, 2016 MAYOR AND TOWN COUNCIL OF SYKESVILLE

PHASE 2B DROP-IN INFORMATION SESSION PROJECT BACKGROUND:

What is a special taxing district? A History of Special Taxing Districts

SUBJECT: Report Number PDC Acquisition of 20 Single Family Residences from the Housing Authority of Portland EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

7. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

LIVE STREAMING & AUDIO RECORDING. Now In Progress

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA Session Legislative Fiscal Note

(c) County board of commissioners means 1 of the following, as applicable: (ii) In all other counties, 1 of the following:

DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT

La Finestra at the Hacienda. Lease Agreement. Moraga Town Council Meeting May 23, 2018

BISCAYNE BAY CAMPUS REPLACEMENT STUDENT HOUSING

Assets, Regeneration & Growth Committee 11 July Development of new affordable homes by Barnet Homes Registered Provider ( Opendoor Homes )

SELF EVALUATION

City of Toronto Condo Consultation

Lawrence. Police Department. Riverfront

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN POLICY/PROCEDURE Approved by the Town Council at the Town Council Meeting

Town Of Myersville. TOWN HALL Planning Office Phone: Main Street Fax: ANNUAL REPORT 2014

Transcription:

CITY HALL 2020 PROJECT UPDATE/DIRECTION BRIEF September 19, 2017 1

2017 IN REVIEW January 17 th Deficiencies / Space Needs February 28 th Buildings & Assets Presentation May 23 rd Options / Schedules / Budget June 19 th City Hall 2020 Video Clip June 26 th First Public Session June 27 th Options Limited to Municipal Center July 26 th Second Public Session, Facebook Live August 23 rd Third Public Session September 1 st Public Information Session Info 2

WHERE ARE WE? Building deficiencies well documented Program (space needs analysis) developed through 2070 and revalidated CIP 3072, City Hall Replacement Approved 50,250,000 for Planning / Design / Construction Developed 6 options to either renovate the existing building, or build a new building Conducted citizen engagement 3

CITY HALL SPACE NEEDS November 2016 Existing B1: 80,000 SF Current Need: 128,431 SF 2020: 134,310 SF 2030: 139,664 SF 2040: 144,572 SF 2070: 149,089 SF August 2017 80,000 SF 134,161 SF 139,607 SF 144,210 SF 147,344 SF 149,939 SF Need 70,000 SF more than we have now to meet 2070 requirement 4

Let s Review Our Options 5

CITY HALL 2020 OPTION 1A Addition to and Renovation of B1, our current City Hall 2

CITY HALL 2020 OPTION 1A ADVANTAGES Reuses an existing Cityowned building. Maintains B1, the current City Hall as the future City Hall. Does not displace any existing parking. DISADVANTAGES Does not provide sufficient space for the known additional space needs. Requires use of temporary facilities (swing space) some departments would move twice. Longest City Hall construction schedule, by about 4 months. Limits implementation of the mall of services concept. Construction activities, immediately adjacent to City Hall would be disruptive. DESIGN COSTS 4,930,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION 37,500,000 TEMPORARY FACILITY COSTS 3,070,000 SITE CONSTRUCTION 1,550,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 42,120,000 FF&E 4,640,000 PROJECT BUDGET CONTINGENCY 5,170,000 TOTAL CITY HALL BUDGET 56,860,000 TOTAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST PER SF 251.53/SF 3

CITY HALL 2020 OPTION 1B Larger addition to B1 to create a completely new City Hall 4

CITY HALL 2020 OPTION 1B ADVANTAGES Connection of the new City Hall to the existing B1 allows more departments to be housed in contiguous space. Removal of the tunnel connecting B1 and B2 (Operations) alleviates an ongoing maintenance issue. DISADVANTAGES Would require the relocation of volunteer park and gazebo. Construction activities, immediately adjacent to City Hall would be disruptive. With multiple entrances and the main entrance to City Hall not facing a major road, there will be wayfinding challenges. DESIGN COSTS 4,310,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION 40,850,000 TEMPORARY FACILITY COSTS 0 SITE CONSTRUCTION 1,830,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 42,680,000 FF&E 3,730,000 PROJECT BUDGET CONTINGENCY 5,080,000 TOTAL CITY HALL BUDGET 55,800,000 TOTAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST PER SF 274.00/SF 5

CITY HALL 2020 OPTION 2 New 3 story building between B1 and B2 6

CITY HALL 2020 OPTION 2 ADVANTAGES Provides improved pedestrian connectivity between the new City Hall, B1 and B2. Removal of the tunnel connecting B1 and B2 alleviates an ongoing maintenance issue. DISADVANTAGES Would require relocation of volunteer park and gazebo. Increases distance from visitor parking to the front door of the building. DESIGN COSTS 4,090,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION 40,510,000 TEMPORARY FACILITY COSTS 0 SITE CONSTRUCTION 2,230,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 42,740,000 FF&E 3,730,000 PROJECT BUDGET CONTINGENCY 5,060,000 TOTAL CITY HALL BUDGET 55,620,000 TOTAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST PER SF 271.72/SF 7

CITY HALL 2020 OPTION 3A New 3 story building between Building 2 and the School Administration Building 8

CITY HALL 2020 OPTION 3A ADVANTAGES Creates a new City Hall with its entrance on George Mason Drive with service entrances colocated with B2. Centralizes City Hall within the municipal campus. DISADVANTAGES Minimal standoff distance from Mattaponi Road. DESIGN COSTS 4,080,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION 40,510,000 TEMPORARY FACILITY COSTS 0 SITE CONSTRUCTION 2,070,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 42,580,000 FF&E 3,730,000 PROJECT BUDGET CONTINGENCY 5,040,000 TOTAL CITY HALL BUDGET 55,430,000 TOTAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST PER SF 271.72/SF 9

CITY HALL 2020 OPTION 3B New 3 story building adjacent to B2 10

CITY HALL 2020 OPTION 3B ADVANTAGES Locates City Hall near Building 2 while creating a distinguished City Hall presence on George Mason Drive. Provides improved pedestrian connectivity to Building 2. Leaves the Building 3 site available for future development. DISADVANTAGES Obstructs the front door to B2. DESIGN COSTS 4,150,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION 40,520,000 TEMPORARY FACILITY COSTS 0 SITE CONSTRUCTION 2,770,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 43,290,000 FF&E 3,730,000 PROJECT BUDGET CONTINGENCY 5,120,000 TOTAL CITY HALL BUDGET 56,290,000 TOTAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST PER SF 271.78/SF 11

CITY HALL 2020 OPTION 3C New 3 story building adjacent to Building 2 and the School Administration Building 12

CITY HALL 2020 OPTION 3C ADVANTAGES Provides opportunity for a pedestrian friendly City Square in front of the City Hall by closing Mattaponi Road. Centralizes City Hall to the Municipal Campus improving pedestrian access. DISADVANTAGES Requires the closing of Mattaponi Road, restricting vehicular movement on campus DESIGN COSTS 4,190,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION 40,770,000 TEMPORARY FACILITY COSTS 0 SITE CONSTRUCTION 3,240,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 44,010,000 FF&E 3,730,000 PROJECT BUDGET CONTINGENCY 5,200,000 TOTAL CITY HALL BUDGET 57,130,000 TOTAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST PER SF 273.46/SF 13

PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSIONS Citizen Engagement Initiative Inform the public Solicit feedback regarding options Dedicated Webpage info / survey, 114 respondents Public Sessions briefs / surveys, 99 attendees, 43 surveys 2 City Employee Meetings 95 surveys Virtual Meeting 2,506 views 18

PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT TAKEAWAYS Option 2 was the alternative preferred by most Ease of Access / Security Parking / ADA / Security / EMS Access / Signage Architectural Considerations Efficiency of space / Integrity of Municipal Center / Incorporate Technology Logistical Considerations (Program Desires) Kiosks for Zoning, Permits & Inspections Community spaces / Computer lab Space for a historian and virtual tour of City Library book drop, workout spaces, food services What does the future hold for Building 1? 19

MUNICIPAL CENTER Reuse of Building 1 Construction of a new B3 for Public Utilities and IT has been discussed for about 10 years. 2011 planning study identified a space requirement of 76,904 SF. New B3 construction would cost 36M. Since B1 provides 80,000 SF, we have an opportunity to renovate B1 for PU and IT Renovation could be done for 24M. A 24M CIP will be presented in the FY19 program to facilitate design in 2021 and renovation in 2022 DESIGN COSTS 2,230,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION 17,310,000 TEMPORARY FACILITY COSTS 0 SITE CONSTRUCTION 350,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 17,660,000 FF&E 2,160,000 PROJECT BUDGET CONTINGENCY 2,210,000 TOTAL CITY HALL BUDGET 24,610,000 TOTAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST PER SF 200.52/SF 3

PATH FORWARD Discussion of options Selection of preferred option via City Council Resolution 21

BACKUP SLIDES 22

MUNICIPAL CENTER Reuse of Building 1 ADVANTAGES OF CONSOLIDATING IT & PUBLIC UTILITIES Consolidation of dispersed IT and PU staff enhances effectiveness and efficiency IT Data Center, in the basement of B2 is susceptible to flooding. An upper floor in B1 is a safer location. Space would be available in B2 to enable floorbyfloor remodeling of B11 (Public Safety) without having to build/lease swing space. Ultimately, Public Works could consolidate dispersed staff into the 2 nd and 3 rd floors of B2. Planning could better serve the public utilizing the Basement and 1 st floors of B2. Repurposing or possibly demolition of 3 buildings B4, B17, & B22. Reduction of overall Municipal Center square footage via targeted demolition reduces maintenance and utility expenses. 3

City Hall Milestone Schedule Design services (full plans and specifications) October 2017 October 2018 Construction contractor solicitation / selection November 2018 April 2019 Construction May 2019 May 2021 May 2019 September 2021 (Option 1A) Furnishing and Movein June 2021 August 2021 September 2021 October 2021 (Option 1A) 24

Other Benefits of a New City Hall IT Department Needs additional SF now and longterm Data Center is in the basement of B2, susceptible to flooding IT staff is dispersed in 9 different Municipal Center buildings Public Utilities Department Needs additional SF now and longterm PU staff is dispersed in 3 different Municipal Center buildings. A combined PU / IT facility would require 77,000 gross SF Renovating and repurposing B1 for this function looks like an opportunity Public Safety / Police Department, B11 Condition of B11 is very similar to that of City Hall Basement and 2 nd Floor of B2 would make great swing space for B11 renovation Public Works Department Needs more SF now and longterm in B2 PW staff is dispersed in 4 different Municipal Center buildings Could consolidate using 2 nd and 3 rd floor of B2 Planning Department Needs more SF now and longterm in B2 Could provide better public service using entire 1 st floor and basement of B2 25

Space Needs November 2016 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH NEW CITY HALL SPACE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY CURRENT 2020 2030 2040 2070 NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS PERS NSF PERS NSF PERS NSF PERS NSF PERS NSF CITY HALL BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES 15 2,731 16 2,893 17 2,979 20 3,390 23 3,800 CITY ATTORNEY 43 11,166 48 12,014 50 12,497 54 13,302 54 13,410 CITY AUDITOR 7 2,741 8 2,903 11 3,475 16 4,344 18 4,641 CITY CLERK 6 2,205 6 2,205 6 2,205 6 2,205 6 2,237 CITY MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL/CITY MANAGER 21 17,203 21 17,268 22 17,532 22 17,662 22 17,921 COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE 65 12,663 70 13,230 70 13,642 71 14,106 71 15,004 FINANCE 59 17,110 70 18,622 74 19,113 74 19,113 74 19,113 MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS 17 6,446 19 6,743 22 7,464 23 7,599 25 8,145 POLICE AND SECURITY 1 216 1 216 1 216 1 216 1 216 TREASURER 72 13,538 86 14,629 102 15,881 116 16,994 129 18,058 SHARED SUPPORT SPACES 16,727 16,727 16,727 16,727 16,727 TOTAL PERSONNEL / NSF 306 102,744 345 107,448 375 111,731 403 115,657 423 119,271 CURRENT / REQUIRED GROSS SQ FT 128,431 134,310 139,664 144,572 149,089 Required gross square footage calculation above is determined using an efficiency of 80%. 26

Space Needs August 2017 CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH NEW CITY HALL SPACE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY CURRENT 2020 2030 2040 2070 NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS NEEDS PERS NSF PERS NSF PERS NSF PERS NSF PERS NSF CITY HALL BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES 14 2,699 15 2,861 17 3,082 19 3,406 23 3,951 CITY ATTORNEY 43 11,441 48 12,289 50 12,772 54 13,577 55 13,921 CITY AUDITOR 7 2,741 8 2,903 10 3,313 12 3,723 12 3,723 CITY CLERK 6 2,277 7 2,392 7 2,399 9 2,473 9 2,627 CITY MAYOR/CITY COUNCIL/CITY MANAGER 19 17,238 20 17,238 21 17,346 21 17,346 21 17,346 COMMISSIONER OF THE REVENUE 65 13,219 70 13,786 70 14,265 73 15,094 73 15,992 FINANCE 59 16,519 67 17,558 71 18,001 71 18,001 71 18,001 COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE 20 7,625 20 7,625 24 8,432 24 8,432 26 8,735 POLICE AND SECURITY 1 216 1 216 1 216 1 216 1 216 TREASURER 74 14,658 90 16,122 99 16,845 100 16,910 99 16,743 SHARED SUPPORT SPACES 17,132 17,132 17,132 17,132 17,132 VOLUNTEER OFFICE 4 1,565 4 1,565 4 1,565 4 1,565 4 1,565 TOTAL PERSONNEL / NSF 312 107,329 350 111,686 374 115,368 388 117,875 394 119,952 CURRENT / REQUIRED GROSS SQ FT 134,161 139,607 144,210 147,344 149,939 Required gross square footage calculation above is determined using an efficiency of 80%. 27

Cost Models Options 1A 3C CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION OPTION 1A DESIGN 4,930,000 NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION 37,500,000 OPTION 1B OPTION 2 4,310,000 OPTION 3A 4,090,000 4,080,000 40,850,000 40,510,000 40,510,000 OPTION 3B OPTION 3C 4,150,000 40,520,000 4,190,000 40,770,000 TEMPORARY FACILITY COSTS 3,070,000 SITE CONSTRUCTION 1,550,000 1,830,000 2,230,000 2,070,000 2,770,000 3,240,000 SITE ACQUISITION NEW CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL 42,120,000 42,680,000 42,740,000 42,580,000 43,290,000 44,010,000 FF&E 4,640,000 3,730,000 3,730,000 3,730,000 3,730,000 3,730,000 PROJECT BUDGET CONTINGENCY 5,170,000 5,080,000 5,060,000 5,040,000 5,120,000 5,200,000 TOTAL CITY HALL BUDGET TOTAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION COST PER SF TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED 56,860,000 251.53 149,089 55,800,000 274.00 149,089 55,620,000 271.72 149,089 55,430,000 271.72 149,089 56,290,000 271.78 149,089 57,130,000 273.46 149,089 FUTURE CONSTRUCTION (BEYOND 6 YEARS NOT INCLUDED IN FY1823 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM) BUILDING 3 35,690,000 BUILDING 1 RENOVATION Inc Above 24,610,000 24,610,000 24,610,000 24,610,000 24,610,000 TOTAL BUDGET INC FUTURE FACILITIES PROGRAM 92,550,000 80,410,000 80,230,000 80,040,000 80,900,000 81,740,000 Renovation of Building 1 Construction of Building 3 New City Hall TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED 86,327 86,327 62,762 235,416 86,327 0 149,089 235,416 86,327 0 149,089 235,416 86,327 0 149,089 235,416 86,327 0 149,089 235,416 86,327 0 149,089 235,416 28