DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount

Similar documents
Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

Comprehensive Plan Amendment #PLN , Reserve at Cannon Branch (Coles Magisterial District)

Chapter URBAN VILLAGE ZONING DISTRICTS

Article Optional Method Requirements

Fundamentals. New ordinance takes effect April 1, 2016

PLANNING AND REGULATING HOUSING OPTIONS FOR CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS

DRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes

Unified Development Ordinance. Chamblee Chamber of Commerce Meeting May 21, 2015

UPDATE Board of Selectmen June 20, 2017

COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOODS AND HOUSING. Community Summit 02 February, 2012

Poverty Rates by Census Tracts

STAFF REPORT City of Ormond Beach Department of Planning

Downtown 2025 Sector Development Plan

PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015

Master Plan Review SILVER SPRING CBD. Approved and Adopted February Updated January 2013

Trenton Train Station Redevelopment Process. Applying the Principles of Successful Transit Oriented Development

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

UDO Advisory Committee Meeting #3 August 18, 2011

APPENDIX A PART 1: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS

Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

Ann Arbor Downtown Zoning Evaluation

FINAL DRAFT 12/1/16, Rev. to 7/18/17

ARTICLE OPTIONAL METHOD REGULATIONS

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Missing Middle Housing in Practice

PLANNING COMMISSION. Agenda Item # 2.

Puyallup Downtown Planned Action & Code Changes. January 10, 2017

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

Chapter 5: Testing the Vision. Where is residential growth most likely to occur in the District? Chapter 5: Testing the Vision

Director, Community Planning, North York District

City of Spokane Infill Development. June 30, 2016

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

Twin Cities Region Equitable Development Principles & Scorecard

To Download the Guidelines Document:

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

Bridgeland-Riverside Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP)

EIA Model Test 7: R-O to R-O

Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Build-Out Analysis. City of Buffalo, New York. Prepared by:

Appendix D - Manheim Township Zoning Ordinance

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

Modernizing DC s Zoning Code. Summer/Fall 2012

Residential. Infill / Intensification Development Review

LILLIAN WEBB PARK DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL. City of Norcross, Georgia 2034 Comprehensive Plan

MODERATE INCOME RENTAL HOUSING PILOT PROGRAM: APPLICATION PROCESS, PROJECT REQUIREMENTS AND AVAILABLE INCENTIVES

DRAFT. Amendment to the Master Plan Land Use Element for Block 5002, Lot Township of Teaneck, Bergen County, New Jersey.

Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PUD/DCI BAINBRIDGE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT

F l e x c o d e. T o w n o f L e l a n d, N C

PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING TOD: KEY FACTORS FOR SUCCESS. Sujata Srivastava Knowledge Corridor TOD Workshop June 5, 2013

CITY OF PORTSMOUTH. CITY COUNCIL POLICY No HOUSING POLICY

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

EIA Model Test 7: R-O to R-O

Downtown Plano. Creating a Transit Village

ANC 1A ZONING REGULATIONS REVIEW SUMMARY. February, 2014

2014 Plan of Conservation and Development. Development Plan & Policies

The Philadelphia Code. Table : Commercial and Commercial Mixed-Use Districts {For a printable PDF version, click HERE}

Using Performance Measures to Improve Parking Policies & Livability

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 904

Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed. November 2009 COMPLETED CODE AMENDMENTS. Parking Regulations Effective Sept 28, 2009 Ordinance No.

Bunker Hill Part II Urban Design. Specific Plan. Case No. CPC SP TABLE OF CONTENTS

(H) RM-10: LOW-DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 123

PLANNING COMMISSION WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA WORK SESSION AGENDA Wednesday, May 23, 2012

HOUSING ELEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION...HO- 1 BAINBRIDGE ISLAND SNAPSHOT: PEOPLE AND HOUSING.. HO-1

PIN , Part 1, Plan SR-713 in Lot 2, Concession 5, Township of McKim (1096 Dublin Street, Sudbury)

CITY OF FATE, TEXAS UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE. Article III Zoning Districts

Place Type Descriptions Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

SECTION 6: DOWNTOWN ZONES

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

Wheaton Sector Plan. Preliminary. Recommendations. Montgomery County Planning Board

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

INCENTIVE POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

GNV RISE Subdivision. GNV RISE Subdivision

NC 54/I-40 Corridor Master Plan Draft Land Use Blueprint

ATTACHMENT C. Development Requirements

Indicates Council-recommended changes Introduced by: Mr. Tackett Date of introduction: June 14, 2016 SUBSTITUTE NO. 1 TO ORDINANCE NO.

A. Districts Concept

Planning & Strategic Initiatives Committee

Article 04 Single Family Residential Districts

Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed As of September 2014

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

Policy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site

Missing Middle Housing Types Showcasing examples in Springfield, Oregon

BUILDING HEIGHTS. The following diagram depicts the maximum allowable building height in a +3 zone.

ARTICLE V AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

Article Floating Zone Requirements

Zoning Regulations of the Town of Redding Connecticut

CHAPTER 2: PEOPLE AND THEIR HOMES

Pima Country, Arizona Code of Ordinances : Residential recreation areas.

Coding For Places People Love Main Street Corridor District

(Draft Glenville ordinance, June 2008) ARTICLE XXII Transfer of Development Rights

Introduction. General Development Standards

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT BENDER URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY EXPANSION AND ANNEXATION REQUEST April 3, Background

3.0 Project Description

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND POLICIES

Transcription:

DRAFT 2030 Plan Incentives July 26, 2006 Part A: Basic Discount In order for a development to be eligible for any 2030 Land Resource Management Plan Discounts it must be located in the Urban Corridor and meet all of the following Smart Growth criteria. A 40% discount is provided if all 5 criteria of Part A are met. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide the required submittals. Words that are underlined are defined at the end of this document. 1. Location: Project is to be located within the Urban Corridor as defined by the Kane County 2030 Land Resource Management Plan Intent: The Urban Corridor, the municipalities along the Fox River from Algonquin on the north to Montgomery on the south, is experiencing what can best be described a renaissance, a new urban focus for a new century The development strategy for the corridor includes downtown revitalization, neighborhood preservation, redevelopment, and infill development The strategy is working and the renaissance needs to be fostered and encouraged as the 2030 Plan is implemented so the Urban Corridor may continue to serve as home to the majority of the county s residents. (2030 Land Resource Management Plan, p. 22) Can 50% or more of Kane County s total area still be in farmland and open space uses by 2030? The answer to the citizens of Kane County is yes, but only if we obtain the goal of almost 50% of the new population residing within the Urban Corridor. (2030 Land Resource Management Plan, p. 25) 2. Mixed Land Uses Prerequisite: Project boundary is: within ¼ mile walking distance of at least 4 of the following uses: within ½ mile walking distance of at least 6 of the following uses:

park; school; place of worship; convenience store; neighborhood retail; stand-alone pharmacy; bank; community or civic center; library; post office; laundry/dry cleaner; restaurant; supermarket; other offices or places of employment Note: Uses may not be counted in 2 categories medical/dental office; Intent: In order to enhance community livability and decrease auto dependency, a mix of land uses within a neighborhood combine residential with retail, restaurants, schools, and other amenities in close proximity to encourage ease of pedestrian access. (2030 Land Resource Management Plan, p. 53) Keeping services and shopping within a half-mile of residences and providing desirable and safe routes to reach the destination is essential. (2030 Land Resource Management Plan, p. 78) 3. Compact Development Prerequisites: Average residential density of at least seven units per acre; Average non-residential FAR of at least 0.5 Intent: Research shows that regular, half-hour bus transit service begins to be viable at around seven dwelling units per acre and that, other factors, being equal, each doubling of residential density is associated with a 20-30% reduction in vehicle miles traveled per household and per capita. See, e.g., Pushkarev and Zupan, Public Transportation and Land Use Policy, Indiana University Press, 1977. (LEED for Neighborhood Developments Rating System Preliminary Draft, September 6, 2005, p. 49)

4. Housing Diversity Prerequisite: Within the project within 1/4 mile of project, a maximum of 50% of any one housing type as follows: Detached residential (max. 2000 SF; max. 6200 SF Lot Size) Detached residential (2000 SF +) Attached townhouse or duplex (max. 1800 SF) Attached townhouse or duplex (1800 SF +) Residence in multi-unit building (max. 1200 SF) Residence in multi-unit building (1200 SF +) Live/work unit (max. 1200 SF) Live/work unit (1200 SF +) Accessory unit (max. 1200 SF) Intent: Planning Issues Housing Objective #1. To encourage a variety of housing types to meet the profound changes and shifts in the socio-demographic profile of Kane County residents (2030 Land Resource Management Plan, p. 45) 5. Walkability Prerequisites: Average block perimeter limited to max. 2200 ft.; AND No parking allowed between building and sidewalk along street Intent: Walkable neighborhoods consist of an interconnected street network providing connectivity and linkages throughout the entire neighborhood and to specific destinations. (2030 Land Resource Management Plan, p. 179) a few tools for improving strip commercial centers: place buildings upfront with attractive architecture, wall signs and sidewalks featured along the frontage, not parking lots and pole signs; encourage a mix of housing and other uses adjacent to the shopping to begin to build a walkable neighborhood rather than a strictly commercial driving district; fill in fronts of large parking lots with small, closely spaced or attached storefronts to build a street frontage with courtyard parking behind. (2030 Land Resource Management Plan, p. 61)

Part B: Additional Discounts In addition to the Basic Discount for meeting the Location and Smart Growth criteria in Part A, a proposed development is eligible for additional discounts if it meets any of the following criteria. Each of the following is worth a 10% discount in addition to the 40% discount provided for the Location and Smart Growth criteria, which are still required to be met. 1. Transportation Efficiency & Choice (10% additional discount): Project to be located on infill or previously developed site Majority (over 80%) of dwelling units and business entrances are within 1/2 mile walking distance of existing or planned bus service within 1 mile walking distance of existing or planned train service 2. Increased Housing Diversity (10% additional discount): Within the project within 1/4 mile of project, a maximum of 25% of any one housing type, as listed in Part A #4 3. Density X2 (10% additional discount): Average residential density of at least 14 units per acre; Average non-residential FAR of at least 1.0 4. Density X4 (10% additional discount): Average residential density of at least 28 units per acre; Average non-residential FAR of at least 1.5 Maximum discount is 80%; a minimum of 20% of the Road Impact Fee must be paid.

DRAFT 2030 PLAN DISCOUNTS DEFINITIONS Density FAR Infill site Project Residential density is calculated by dividing the total number of units by the total buildable land area in acres. Buildable land excludes land occupied by nonresidential structures, and land excluded from residential development by law (e.g. wetlands, floodplains). For detached units on individual lots, use the average density for the entire development as reported to the Road Improvement Impact Fee Program. Floor Area Ratio A site having at least 75% of its perimeter bordering land that has been previously developed. Previously developed land means having pre-existing paving, construction, or altered landscapes. Land that is currently in agricultural use, forestry use, or is a preserved natural area is not considered previously developed. Previously developed sites have at least 75% land which has been previously developed. The land and construction that constitutes the basis for a road impact fee application. Use Type Individual use types include residential, retail, office. "Commercial" is not a single use type. A residential component is not required as part of a project, but proximity (Part A #2) and diversity (Part B #4) must still be met along with all of the Part A criteria. Uses may not be counted in two categories, e.g., an office building gets counted only once even if it is also a major employment center, and a store of any kind gets counted only once even if it has a diverse line of products and services. But a mixed use building housing several of the above services as distinct enterprises would count each as a separate use.

Walking Distance The distance that a pedestrian must travel between destinations without obstruction, in a safe and comfortable environment such as sidewalks, footpaths or other pedestrian facilities. These facilities must be maintained year-round and do not include facilities such as bike trails that are not cleared of snow in the winter. Distance is measured in linear feet along such paths, with 1320 feet representing 1/4 mile and 2640 feet representing 1/2 mile. Average Block Perimeter The linear measurement taken along the public right-of-way line around an area of land entirely bounded by streets.