Moorestown Housing Element Draft

Similar documents
Affordable Housing. Settlement of Ridgewood s Affordable Housing Litigation. December 5, Elizabeth McManus, PP, AICP, LEED AP

AFFORDABLE HOUSING MONROE TOWNSHIP

Bernardsville Housing Element and Fair Share Plan. Presentation to Planning Board 5/24/18

Presentation to Citizens COAH / West Farms Road Project Township Council Meeting. October 19 th, 2015

AFFORDABLE HOUSING. Overview

Township of Denville Affordable Housing Update Facts & Frequently-Asked Questions

Affordable Housing Background & Frequently Asked Questions Prepared: September 14, 2017

WHEREAS, currently pending development fee payments total $750,000; and

IN RE CLINTON TOWNSHIP, ) NEW JERSEY COUNCIL HUNTERDON COUNTY ) ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING

In the Matter of the Village of Ridgewood, County of Bergen, Docket No. BER-L

NJAC 5:97-2.2(e), the provision of affordable housing shall be based on the issuance of

TOWNSHIP OF CLARK FAIR SHARE PLAN

Re"nee Reiss^/Secretary New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing

Public Portion: Mr. Bianchini opened the public portion. There being no comment, the public portion was closed. Resolutions:

On July 3, 2007, the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing (the "Council" or

HOUSING ELEMENT AND FAIR SHARE PLAN

SUPPLEMENTAL MODIFICATION TO THE MASTER PLAN REEXAMINATION REPORT TOWN OF HACKETTSTOWN WARREN COUNTY, NEW JERSEY DECEMBER 2008

Status of Affordable Housing Litigation as of December 31, 2018

A. This ordinance shall not be effective until approved by COAH pursuant to NJAC 5:

WEST WINDSOR TOWNSHIP

COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DOCKET NO. COAH THE HILLS DEVELOPMENT CO., ) Plaintiff ) v. ) TOWNSHIP OF BERNARDS, ) Defendant, )

Ordinance No Affordable Housing Ordinance Borough of Glen Ridge, Essex County

Information Only. WHEREAS, the collection of development fees will assist the Township in meeting its affordable housing obligations; and

AB 1397 HOUSING ELEMENT LAW SITE IDENTIFICATION STRENGTHENED OVERVIEW

2011 AICP Review Course

By motion dated January 3, 2 008, the New Jersey Council. on Affordable Housing (the "Council" or "COAH") received a request

January 23, In the Matter of the Application of the Borough of Red Bank, County of Monmouth, Docket No. MON-L

IN RE MOTION TO RESCIND ) NEW JERSEY COUNCIL ON BOROUGH OF ALLENDALE'S ) AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUBSTANTIVE CERTIFICATION ) OPINION COAH DOCKET #

Subject. Date: 2016/10/25. Originator s file: CD.06.AFF. Chair and Members of Planning and Development Committee

IN RE TOWN OF ) SECAUCUS/XCHANGE AT ) SECAUCUS JUNCTION ) OPINION INCLUSIONARY DEVELOPMENT ) DOCKET # /

1. The continued delay by the New Jersey Council on Affordable Housing ("COAH") in

MEMBERS OF THE BOROUGH OF ORADELL PLANNING BOARD

ASSEMBLY, No. 266 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

housing plan May 18, 2009

18 Sale and Other Disposition of Regional Lands Policy

Spending Plan TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON

OTTAWA COMMUNITY LANDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DOCKET NO.CO/\W W IN RE FANWOOD/MOTION TO ) OPINION

2018 Housing Plan Element and Fair Share Plan

This matter having been opened to the Council on Affordable Housing by. applicant Borough of Oceanport, on a motion to exclude from consideration for

HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTION DOCUMENT

State Policy Options for Promoting Affordable Housing

Plan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 12-13, 2010 Georgia Tech Student Center

FAIR HOUSING & FAIR SHARE PLANNING California s Housing Element Law & Inclusionary Zoning

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of Health, Housing & Community Services

(Council) upon the application of the Civic League of Greater. New Brunswick (League) for an Order prohibiting the Township of

CITY OF TORONTO. Response to the Provincial Inclusionary Zoning Consultation

NEW JERSEY COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DOCKET NO. COAH In Re: PETITION FOR SUBSTANTIVE CERTIFICATION OF RAMSEY BOROUGH, BERGEN COUNTY

TOWNSHIP OF EVESHAM ORDINANCE NO

Corporate Report. 2. That the Interim Control By-law prohibit within the Low Density Residential Suburban Neighbourhood (R1) zone, the following:

Public Hearing. Green Township Petition for Plan Conformance

Smashmouth Affordable Housing New Jersey s Third Round: From Fair Share to Growth Share

BURGIS ASSOCIATES, INC.

Affordable Housing Update

COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING IN RE TOWNSHIP ) COAH DOCKET NO OF RIVER VALE ) MOTION DECISION

Participants of the Ministerial Meeting on Housing and Land Management on 8 October 2013 in Geneva

Pondview, and a Scarce Resource Restraint imposed by the Council on June 13, All briefs have been filed and the appeal is pending in the

Barbara County Housing Element. Table 5.1 Proposed Draft Housing Element Goals, Policies and Programs

Rachel G. Bratt. Professor Emerita Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning Tufts University

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

IN RE BETHLEHEM ) TOWNSHIP: ORDER ) OPINION TO SHOW CAUSE )

Plan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 11-12, 2011 Georgia Tech Student Center

Low and Moderate Income Housing Asset Fund Housing Successor Report Year ended June 30, 2014

Adopts a revised Real Property Excess, Surplus, and Disposition Policy and supersedes Resolution No. R99-35.

SECTION I - INTRODUCTION

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Inter-Departmental Correspondence Planning and Building. Steve Monowitz, Community Development Director

INFORMATION ITEM. Annual Report to the City Council Concerning the City=s Affordable Housing Production Program Ordinance.

What is Affordable Housing?

COMMENTS REGARDING COAH's PROPOSED NEW THIRD ROUND SUBSTANTIVE RULES

TOWNSHIP COUNCIL AGENDA REGULAR MEETING 7:00 P.M. September 17, 2018 Municipal Building, 600 Bloomfield Avenue

Minutes of the Planning Board of the Township Of Hanover JULY 14, Board Secretary, Kimberly Bongiorno took the Roll Call.

Inclusive Housing Policies in Rising Markets

Thank you for the opportunity to provide commentary on the Draft Highlands Regional Master plan. (RMP)

To provide exceptional customer service to every property Owner and ensure that every property is performing at the highest level possible.

Contents Introductory Section... 3 Financial Section... 6 Required Information... 9

Re: In the Matter of Fair Share Housing Center, Inc. et al. v. Cherry Hill Township, et al. Docket No. CAM-L

DRAFT Inclusionary Housing Survey. Prepared for San Francisco s Technical Advisory Committee

Poughkeepsie City Center Revitalization Plan

Draft for Public Review. The Market and Octavia Neighborhood Plan

NOTICE ORDINANCE NO Township of Neptune County of Monmouth

Amended Third Round Housing Element and Fair Share Plan. Township of Cranbury Middlesex County, New Jersey

Amended Third Round Housing Element & Fair Share Plan

Town of Yucca Valley GENERAL PLAN 1

Summary of Status of Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) Rule Compliance

Exclusionary Housing vs. Fair Housing: The Need for State Legislation

Volume I, Part III. GENERAL PROPOSAL POLICIES. 1. General Policies

What Affordable Housing Policies Make Sense for New Jersey?

o School crowding. This is probably the biggest concern of many of our residents. The type of rentals proposed are targeted towards young

Eleven Tindall Road Middletown, New Jersey 07748

This is a motion filed by Middletown Township. ("Middletown") in Monmouth County requesting the following relief

Plaintiff, Defendant. Plaintiff, a New Jersey corporation, having its principal. office at 130 Davidson Avneue, Somerset, Somerset County, New

AGREEMENT ON CONSOLIDATION AND FAIR SHARE

Testimony before the New York City Council Committee on Housing and Buildings and the Committee on Land Use

RESOLUTION DISMISSING PETITION FOR SUBSTANTIVE CERTIFICATION NO.

Land Use Control Techniques

FINAL DRAFT CONSISTENCY REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS REPORT

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District

4 Hope Township. 407 Hope-Great Meadows Road P.O. Box 284 Hope, New Jersey 07~44 Phone: / Fax:

1. Updating the findings for the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance ("Ordinance"); and


Transcription:

Moorestown Housing Element Draft

Who qualifies for affordable housing? Seniors Individuals with Special Needs A new college grad making less than $46,592 A family of 4 making less than $66,560

History of Affordable Housing Mt. Laurel I Establishes that each municipality has a constitutional obligation to provide affordable housing Fair Share Housing Center Established Founded by one of the three attorneys who litigated the Mt. Laurel Decision; their mission is to monitor, enforce, and expand the Mt Laurel Decision Mt. Laurel II Requires municipalities to submit housing plans Fair Housing Act Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) is established to implement housing plans

History of Affordable Housing in Moorestown 100% Compliance for COAH Round 1 and 2 332 units created Creation of MEND 1969: Prior to Mt. Laurel Decisions 3 rd Round plan submitted No plans were approved because rules were not established by COAH Planning and Transparency Housing element created through inclusive process Regional Contribution Agreements Payments to towns in need of affordable housing Protect Against Builder s Remedy Legal action taken by a property developer to force a municipality to permit the construction of dense housing, including a set aside for affordable housing

History of Affordable Housing Moorestown Amended Round 1 Substantive Certification Moorestown Achieves Round 1 Substantive Certification Moorestown Achieves Round 2 Substantive Certification Moorestown Adopts Round 3 Plans COAH Round 1 COAH Round 2 COAH Round 3 1987 1988 1991 1993 1997 1999 2005 2008

History of Affordable Housing FSHC Motion FSHC files motion to compel the State to adopt rules COAH Fails to Adopt 3 rd Round Rules Supreme Court Decision COAH Round 3 rules are adopted and overturned twice COAH Methodology is invalidated. New rules are ordered to be adopted Mt Laurel IV Decision Supreme Court transfers approval of housing plans to Courts COAH Round 3 2013 2014 2015 2025

The New Jersey Supreme Court mandated that every municipality in the state has an affordable housing obligation The Current Process for Affordable Housing The court process constrains public discussion Interveners Developers sue a municipality to permit the construction of market rate and affordable housing, or similarly interested parties who wish to intercede in the litigation, such as FSHC The courts shall approve housing plans, with appointment of a Court- Special Master Any future multifamily development over 5 units must have 20% set aside for affordable housing

Current number of households in Moorestown: 7,950 1667 School crowding $283,500,000 Stress on infrastructure Demands on police and fire Increased traffic Total: 6000 units (approximate)

Neither of these options work for Moorestown $283,500,000 6000 units (approximate)

Limit financial obligation to town Protect fabric of town Our Considerations Limit stress on our infrastructure (roads, water and sewer, etc.) Build affordable housing the Moorestown way Limit the impact to schools

Our Options Accept the number Create approximately 6,000 total new households Fight In Court Unknown resolution Lose control Costs 1667? Negotiate We We control our destiny Lower obligation Lower obligation Compliance flexibility Compliance flexibility

Strategies We ve Used Negotiate with FSHC Strategic Partnerships Renew Credit for Existing Units 100% Affordable vs. Inclusionary Zoning Explore All Types of Affordable Housing Vacant Land Adjustment

Vacant Land Adjustment Identify vacant and developable land Calculate potential capacity of development Major Advantages: Eliminate parcels not appropriate for affordable development Known, smaller obligation Moorestown s future obligation will be controlled by Moorestown

1667 1167 Results of the Vacant Land Adjustment 606 300 Unmet Need Addressed through inclusionary zoning overlays

Meeting Our Obligation 1667 1167 606-117 -152 337 Renew Expiring Controls & Surplus Credits Maximize Bonus Credits

Our Tenets for Meeting our Remaining Obligation Maintaining Moorestown s Inclusivity Fiscally Responsible Minimal Impact to the Community

Our Options Accept 1667 Build as many as 6,000 total new households Fight In Court Unknown resolution Lose control Costs 1667? Negotiate We control our destiny Lower obligation We control our destiny Lowest Vacant obligation Land Adjustment Vacant Land Adjustment Compliance flexibility Compliance flexibility

Why we are Seeking a Settlement Compliance flexibility Vacant Land Adjustment Limit costs Lower obligation Control our destiny