Ms. Vaishali Mane Director, Transfer Pricing Services Grant Thornton India LLP

Similar documents
Functional and Comparability Analysis

Pricing. Selection of Methods / Comparables Examples/ Case studies. Sanjay Kapadia

Intangibles CHAPTER CHAPTER OBJECTIVES. After careful study of this chapter, you will be able to:

Session outline IAS 11 IAS 18, 5 28, 39 IAS 18 IAS 18 IAS 18, 39 SIC 31 IAS 18. Multiple elements. Construction contracts

Search for Comparables Workshop on Transfer Pricing ICAI, Bangalore Chapter, 19 August 2006

IAS 18. Revenue recognition Measurement & Disclosures

International Financial Reporting Standards. Sample material

Comparability Toolkit: Background, the Policy Conundrum, and Scope

VALUATION CONSIDERATIONS AND METHODS FOR A PATENT VALUATION ANALYSIS

CFA UK response to the Exposure Draft on Leases

Decision. On Application of Methods on Determination of Customs Value of Goods According to the Transaction Value of Imported Goods (Method 1)

Leases. (a) the lease transfers ownership of the asset to the lessee by the end of the lease term.

University of Economics, Prague. Non-current tangible and intangible assets (IAS 16 & IAS 38)

International Financial Reporting Standard 16 Leases. Objective. Scope. Recognition exemptions (paragraphs B3 B8) IFRS 16

.01 The objective of this Standard is to prescribe the accounting treatment for investment property and related disclosure requirements.

Exposure Draft. Indian Accounting Standard (Ind AS) 116 Leases. (Last date for Comments: August 31, 2017)

TANGIBLE CAPITAL ASSETS

Intellectual Property Forensic Analysis Valuation Considerations

CAS -16 COST ACCOUNTING STANDARD ON DEPRECIATION AND AMORTISATION

IFRS 15 and IFRS 16 Webinar

Intangible Assets Web Site Costs

Accounting for Intangible Assets

Materiële Vaste Activa. 27 September 2005 Pearl Couvreur

31 July 2014 Japan s Modified International Standards (JMIS): Accounting Standards Comprising IFRSs and the ASBJ Modifications

SSAP 18 STATEMENT OF STANDARD ACCOUNTING PRACTICE 18 REVENUE

Exposure Draft. Accounting Standard (AS) 40 Investment Property. Last date for the comments: November 10, 2018

Preparing for the new ASC 842 Leasing Standard Challenges and Solutions. August 24, 2017

Business Combinations

The objective of this policy is to outline the accounting and reporting requirements for tangible capital assets.

CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Sri Lanka Accounting Standard - SLFRS 16. Leases

FASB Finalizes Targeted Amendments to the Related-Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities

Preparing for the new ASC 842 Leasing Standard Challenges and Solutions. August 24, 2017

TOPIC 6 - IAS 38 INTANGIBLE ASSETS

EU JOINT TRANSFER PRICING FORUM

MGT401 Mega Quiz File For Final Term By Innocent Prince

Exposure Draft ED/2010/9 - Leases

FASB Updates Business Definition

Lease accounting scope & impacts

Business Combination. CA Yagnesh Desai. Compiled by CA Yagnesh 1

Intangible Assets Web Site Costs

IFRS Training. IAS 38 Intangible Assets. Professional Advisory Services

In December 2003 the Board issued a revised IAS 17 as part of its initial agenda of technical projects.

IASB Staff Paper March 2011

Accounting Standards for Private Enterprises. A Case Study in Transition

Click to edit Master title style REVENUE RECOGNITION Understanding the New Revenue Recognition Standard ASC 606

Capital Assets, Supplies, Equipment, and Intangible Property

Intellectual Property Rights - Accounting aspects

In December 2003 the IASB issued a revised IAS 17 as part of its initial agenda of technical projects.

LEASING VS OWNING: HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE

What is the Omni-Circular Final Guidance on the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principals and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards

BUSINESS COMBINATIONS: CLARIFYING THE DEFINITION OF A BUSINESS

Intangible Assets IAS 38, IAS 36, IFRS 3

Security over Collateral. USA - NEBRASKA Baird Holm LLP

Federal Grants Manual Webinar Series: Property Management

EU JOINT TRANSFER PRICING FORUM

Intangible Assets. Contents. Accounting Standard (AS) 26 (issued 2002)

REVIEW PROBLEM 1: CONTRASTING VARIABLE AND ABSORPTION COSTING

Sri Lanka Accounting Standard LKAS 40. Investment Property

7 Days Intensive Workshop on IFRS ICAI Tower, BKC, Mumbai. IAS 16 Property, Plant & Equipments

Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate

Accounting Standards for. A Case Study in Transition

December 13, delivery: To: Subject: File Reference No

Finishing strong in the ASC 606 marathon: An in-depth look at Step 5 and contract costs

Topic 14 IAS 18 - Revenue

This article is relevant to the Diploma in International Financial Reporting and ACCA Qualification Papers F7 and P2

CAPITAL ASSET POLICY

Accounting for Amalgamations

ANNUAL REPORT 2017 Lake Country Co-operative Association Limited

The joint leases project change is coming

GASBs Presented by: William Blend, CPA, CFE

Non-current Assets. Prof.(FH) Dr. Walter Egger

Chapter 11. Learning Objectives. Non-current Assets. Horngren, Best, Fraser, Willett: Accounting 6e 2010 Pearson Australia

Real estate project costs

A Professional Real Estate Advisory Firm Advice You Can Trust

17 July International Accounting Standards Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH United Kingdom. Dear Sir/Madam

DUE DILIGENCE HEART OF A PRIVATE EQUITY TRANSACTION

General Terms and Conditions for the Sale and Delivery of Software Support Services Edition

New Zealand Equivalent to International Financial Reporting Standard 16 Leases (NZ IFRS 16)

New Accounting Rules for Nonfinancial Asset Sales

Financial Accounting Standards Committee

TOWN OF LINCOLN COUNCIL POLICY

Broker. Basic Business Appraisal. Chapter 9. Copyright Gold Coast Schools 1

A Comparative Study on Depreciation as Per Companies Act and Income Tax Act in Indian Context

THE CHAIRPERSON. Hans Hoogervorst Chairman International Accounting Standard Board 30 Cannon Street London EC4M 6XH.

Special Purpose Properties. Special Valuation Considerations

Ind AS 115 Impact on the real estate sector and construction companies

Contract-Related Intangible

FIRST PRINCIPLES OF VALUE

Intangible Assets. Contents. Accounting Standard (AS) 26

Accounting for Amalgamations

INTANGIBLE ASSETS (IAS 38) OBJECTIVE The objective of this IAS is to prescribe the accounting treatment of intangible assets not dealt in any other

Insights into IFRS 16 Global

Tangible Personal Property Summation Valuation Procedures

Distributor Agent Commissionaire Franchisee Buy/Sell Buy For Licence Binding Framework

Lease Accounting and Loan Covenants: What is the Impact?

Business Combinations IFRS 3

COMMITTEE OF EUROPEAN SECURITIES REGULATORS

CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT DATED AS OF, 2008 AMONG SELLING COMPANY LLC SELLING COMPANY TOO LLC [NEWCO] SC ACQUISITION CO. AND SCT ACQUISITION CO.

In December 2003 the Board issued a revised IAS 40 as part of its initial agenda of technical projects.

Transcription:

Function, Asset and Risk Analysis Mumbai Ms. Vaishali Mane Director, Transfer Pricing Services Grant Thornton India LLP 2012 Grant Thornton India LLP. All rights reserved.

Tested Party Key Takeaways

FAR analysis - exercise to determine and document significant economic activities performed by the enterprise and its AEs in an International Transaction The allocation of these activities between those entities involved in the transaction so each entity can be fully characterised Price charged in any transaction reflects the functions performed (taking into account the risks assumed and assets used) FAR analysis essential to determine comparability Functional analysis identifies and compares Economically significant activities Assets used Risks assumed Functions Risks Assets

Gathering and organizing facts needed to analyze intercompany prices To identify an appropriate level of profit that related parties should earn with respect to intercompany transactions under review To identify effects of functions, risks and assets on its profitability To determine the economic characterization of the entities in the international transaction To determine the most appropriate method for benchmarking the international transaction To identify any uncontrolled transaction involving one of the controlled parties

The arm s length principle is based on comparability: [When] conditions are made or imposed between two [associated] enterprises in their commercial or financial relations which differ from those which would be made between independent enterprises, then any profits which would, but for those conditions, have accrued to one of the enterprises, but, by reason of those conditions, have not so accrued, may be included in the profits of that enterprise and taxed accordingly. * *Paragraph 1 of Article 9 of the OECD Model Tax Convention

Transactions Functions Risks Entities Assets Products FAR Analysis Agreements / Terms Markets / Competition Business Processes Forecasts / Business Plans Organisation / Staff Financial Results

Internal Comparables Understanding of the Business Basis to search for external comparables FAR Analysis Documentation Risk and opportunity assessment Characterization of entities Determination of the MAP Method

Functions performed Activities carried out by each of the parties to the transaction Focus should be on identification of critical functions which add value to the international transactions Principal functions performed by the entities in a controlled transaction are compared with the functions performed in uncontrolled transactions

Assets employed The type of assets and their nature needs to be understood Helps in determination of their contribution to the business process / economic activity Facilitates understanding of respective roles played by the entities participating in the International transaction Knowledge of assets owned and employed by the entities facilitates determination of the profit margin to be earned by them

Risks Assumed Probable variability of future outcomes or returns As the risk increases, the expected return should increase as well The potential risks are company and industry specific Only important risks should be described and quantified Important to distinguish between which entity bears risks as per legal terms and which one bears as per the economic substance of the transaction

Functions Assets Risks Manufacturing / Processing Research & Development Quality control Advertising / Marketing Sales Ordering and distribution Invoicing and collection Inventory Service, Warranty and Spare Parts Administrative, Financial and Legal Matters - Tangible Assets (e.g Building, Plant & Machinery, etc) - Intangible Assets (e.g Patents, Trade Marks, Copyrights etc) Market risk Product liability risk Inventory risk Technology risk Research and development risk Credit risk Foreign exchange risk Manpower risk

Contract IT/ITE Services Contract Manufacturer Sales Agent Low Function & Low Risk Full fledged service provider Manufacturer/ Developer Marketing/ Distribution High Function & High Risk Comprehensive FAR leads to in-depth understanding of the business and related commercial considerations Allows correct characterization of the business Helps setting up of an appropriate pricing model for inter company transactions Robust FAR analysis - foundation of a sound economic analysis

PQR Group, USA develops, manufactures and markets cancer related products PQR India is engaged in the business of import and resale of these products in India

Outside India PQR Group Trading of products Entities Involved Functions - Manufacture - Research & Development - Quality Control - Sales & Distribution India PQR India Distribution Customers - Distribution - Warehousing / Inventory

Assets Employed Type of Assets PQR India PQR Group Employees Yes Yes Property, Plant & Equipment Yes Yes Intangible such as Trade Licenses, Know-How etc No Yes

Risk Assumed Type of Risk PQR India PQR Group Product Development Risk No Yes Market Risk Yes (Limited) Yes Manpower Risk Yes Yes Credit & Collection Risk Yes Yes General business Risk Yes (Limited) Yes Foreign Exchange Risk Yes No Vital Consideration Accordingly, PQR USA should be characterised as the 'Entrepreneur' and WDV India as 'Limited Risk distributor'

ABC India is a is a software development company. Engaged in the development of IT solutions and software products ABC India provides software development and related services to ABC Group ABC India is remunerated by ABC Group on full cost plus mark up basis All the IPRs developed and owned by ABC Group

Outside India India Entities Involved ABC Group ABC India Software Development Services Functions - Contracting, Billing & Collection - Services Delivery - Development of new products - Credit, Market, Service Liability Risk - Development of software - No Credit Risk - Limited Manpower Risk

Assets Employed Type of Assets ABC India ABC Group Employees Yes Yes Property, Plant & Equipment Yes (Limited) Yes Intangible such as Trade Licenses, Know- How etc No Yes

Risk Assumed Type of Risk ABC India ABC Group Entrepreneur Risk No Yes Market Risk No Yes Manpower Risk Yes Yes Credit & Collection Risk No Yes General business Risk Limited Yes Foreign Exchange Risk No Yes Legal Risk No Yes Vital Consideration Accordingly, ABC Group should be characterised as the 'Entrepreneur' and ABC India as 'Limited Risk Bearing enterprise'

Profitability ROI (=Risk) High Profit Examples: High Assets Brand Tradenames Know How Risks Doubtful Debtor Foreign Exchange Market Functions Manufacturing Sales Distribution R&D Low Low

Function, Assets and Risk Analysis Key Takeaways

Participant in an international transaction with whose reference the international transaction is tested The selection of the tested party influences the selection of the most appropriate method to benchmark the international transaction and consequently on the comparables selected The comparables performing similar functions as the AE in the territory in which the AE operates will have to be selected as comparables The term tested party has not been defined in the Indian transfer pricing regulations.

Entity performing simpler functions and not owning any valuable intangibles is normally selected as the tested party Availability of the reliable financial information of the comparable companies Normally least complex entity selected as the tested party as testing the margin of such entity would require least adjustments

ABC Inc Parent Ownership of IP Contract Risk R&D Marketing & Sales USA India Provision of Services Payment for Services ABC India Subsidiary Back Office, accounting Least Complex entity No ownership of IP Tested Party

Selection of comparables based on Economic Characterization of Tested Party Quantitative Analysis Qualitative Analysis Financial Analysis

Function, Assets and Risk Analysis Tested Party

To summarize. Key Takeaways Robust FAR analysis is the foundation of a sound Transfer Pricing Analysis Choice of the tested party should be consistent with the functional analysis of the controlled transaction Selection of Tested Party, plays a central role in the overall application of the arm's- length principle Enough documentation to substantiate

Open House