City of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report

Similar documents
CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL

VARIANCE APPLICATIONS Requirements and Process Overview

Wednesday, October 9, :00 P.M. City Council Chambers

City of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION January 19, Front yard setback variance to convert a three-season porch into a master bedroom at 3649 Woody Lane

To: Stillwater Town Board Reference: Horst Variance Request Stillwater Township, Minnesota Copies To: Town Board Kathy Schmoekel, Town Clerk

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION September 6, 2018

City of Independence

# , Lecy Bros. o/b/o Charlie & Nora Daum, 1920 Fagerness Point Road - Variances (Lot area, hardcover, setbacks) - Public Hearing

1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: a. November 15, 2016 Planning Commission Meeting

SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the Zoning Ordinance

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION July 31, 2014

STAFF REPORT. Arthur and Kathleen Quiggle 4(b)

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION October 26, Rear yard setback variance for a deck expansion at 5732 Kipling Avenue

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION June 16, Parking lot setback variance from 20 feet to 5 feet at K-Tel Drive

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Wayzata Planning Commission. Meeting Agenda

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION June 2, A conditional use permit for 2,328 square feet of accessory structures at 4915 Highland Road

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION October 20, Parking variance for a self-storage facility at 6031 Culligan Way

NOTICE OF MEETING The City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission will conduct a meeting on Monday July 24, 2017 at 7:00 p.m. AGENDA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ACCESSORY STRUCTURES L D C I TEM #6 S U M M A RY A N A LY S I S

Paper copies & an electronic copy (pdf) of the following drawings or plans: 1 full size scalable certified survey and 1 (11 x 17) copy

CITY OF EMILY VARIANCE APPLICATION

NOTICE OF MEETING. The City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission will conduct a meeting on Wednesday, November 14, 2012 at 7:00 p.m.

Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Jessica Loftus, City Administrator

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION June 25, 2015

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Ordinance No. 04 Series of 2013 RECITALS

Corporate Report. 2. That the Interim Control By-law prohibit within the Low Density Residential Suburban Neighbourhood (R1) zone, the following:

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION October 1, Setback variances for a detached garage at Linde Lane

Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA) Detached Accessory Dwellings

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION August 18, Expansion permit to increase the height of the existing building at 5605 Green Circle Drive

CHAPTER 10 Planned Unit Development Zoning Districts

4. MINUTES: Consideration, review and approval of Minutes from the March 15, 2017 meeting.

REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION

RESOLUTION NO BUILDING, ZONING, AND SEWAGE ENFORCEMENT FEE SCHEDULE

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Variance Application

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA PACKET

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION March 19, Brief Description Expansion permit and variance for a new two-story home at 3520

Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Doug Reeder, Interim City Administrator

TOWN OF CLINTON PLANNING BOARD MEETING FINAL MINUTES May 3, 2016

A DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D

MAJOR SUBDIVISION REPLAT/PDA INFORMATION

MAPLE GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION May 26, 2015

1. ROLL CALL Richardson (Vice-Chair) Vacant Bisbee Hamilton Wells Roberts-Ropp Carr (Chair) Peterson Swearer

Draft MINUTES OF THE CARLTON COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING August 21, 2018

INFORMATIONAL HANDOUT FOR GARAGES AND ACCESSORY BUILDINGS RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ZONED R-3 (SINGLE FAMILY, MIN. LOT 11,000 SQ. FT.

PUBLIC HEARINGS Loren and Debra Pelzer Variance for additional approach on parcel

Township of Howick Special Meeting Agenda Tuesday August 7, 2018 at 5 pm Howick Council Chambers

Castle Danger Subordinate Service District Phase I Land Use Ordinance #1

PLANNING 101. What architects think I do. the what s and how s of land use planning

PRINT OR TYPE. Applicant Name: Owner Name (if different): Mailing Address: Phone: (home) (business)

Case To: Oxford Board of Adjustment From: Benjamin Requet, Senior Planner Date: October 10, Applicant: Owner: Request:

Accessory Dwelling Units

Municipal Council has directed staff to report annually on the nature of Variances granted by the Committee of Adjustment.

City of Independence

Staff Report. Planning and Development Services Planning Division

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT

LARAMIE COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Secondary Dwelling Unit

50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 09/03/2015

ORDINANCE NO P 39a/12-16(klk)

City Council Agenda Item #10_ Meeting of May 18, Resolution approving a conditional use permit for an accessory structure at 1721 Oakland Road

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

City Council Agenda Item #11_ Meeting of October 26, 2017

Land Use Application Fees

There was no further discussion. Secretary Warren presented the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION July 19, Expansion permit for an addition at the existing home at 206 Townes Lane

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA June 27, :00pm

CITY OF NAPLES STAFF REPORT

A. Land Use Designations: General Plan: LDR Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1H Single Family Residential - Hillside Overlay

5. This variance is not the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel of land, building or structure;

LAND USE AND ZONING OVERVIEW

LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE

WELCOME! Please start here

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION March 15, Conditional use permit for a microbrewery and taproom at 5959 Baker Road.

Rules and Regulations. for. Building Control Fees. Revised January 2, 2018

APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE APPLICANT:

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Public Notice. Subject Property. May 10, Subject Property: 920 Kilwinning Street

Review Authority. CMC Section (D) requires that applications for a Site Plan Review be reviewed by the commission at a public hearing.

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

WASECA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING July 9, :00 p.m. WASECA COUNTY EAST ANNEX AGENDA

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH

Town of Lake George. Area Variance Review Application

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 07/05/2012

How a Solar Installation Affects. Property Value. Find out how much will your home s value increase by going solar?

Polk County Board of Adjustment October 3, 2014

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Packet Contents: Page #

Transcription:

City of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report Agenda Item: 6C Meeting Date: October 14, 2015 Originating Agenda Section: Public Hearing Department: Community Development Resolution: X Ordinance: N/A Prepared By: Lonnie Nichols, Associate Planner Attachments: 6 Presented By: Lonnie Nichols, Associate Planner Jason and Gretchen Pruett Variance (#15-127) to exceed the maximum allowed floor Item: area of accessory structure for lots greater than one acre at 8015 Sunkist Boulevard North. Proposed Action: MOTION SECOND TO RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL DENY THE VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED FLOOR AREA OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURE FOR LOTS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AT 8015 SUNKIST BOULEVARD NORTH. Staff Recommendation: For the reasons set forth in this report, staff recommends denial of the Variance. Overview: The subject property is located at 8015 Sunkist Blvd North in the R-2 (Detached Single Family Estate) District. The parcel size is 72,185 square feet (200 x 361) or 1.66 acres; and the existing home was constructed in 1958. The Principle Structure total footprint includes 1444 sq. ft. house (habitable space) and 572 sq. ft. attached accessory space (88 sq. ft. glazed porch and 484 sq. ft. attached garage). The applicant has proposed to build an 870 sq. ft. addition to the house and convert the 88 sq. ft. glazed porch, bringing the total footprint of the habitable portion of on the home to 2,402 sq. ft. The applicant has proposed to remove three existing detached accessory structures totaling 966 sq. ft. (476 sq. ft. detached garage, 330 sq. ft. detached garage, and 160 sq. ft. detached shed). The applicant has proposed to build 2,432 sq. ft. of new accessory structure and retain the existing 484 sq. ft. garage, to create a new total footprint of attached accessory structure space to 2,916 sq. ft. Based on the lot size of greater than one acre, the Ordinance (section 152.263.B.3.b) states that the combined floor area of all accessory structures may not exceed 1,500 square feet or the foundation footprint of the habitable portion of the principle building, whichever is greater. Variance Findings The purpose of a variance is to provide for flexibility from zoning code requirements, and a variance may be granted when the applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the requirements. The following five standards are used to determine if practical difficulties exist that support the granting of a variance.

6C Page 2 (1) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. The applicant has proposed to remove three existing detached accessory structures totaling 966 sq. ft. (476 sq. ft. detached garage, 330 sq. ft. detached garage, and 160 sq. ft. detached shed). The applicant has proposed to build 2,432 sq. ft. of new accessory structure and retain the existing 484 sq. ft. garage, to create a new total footprint of attached accessory structure space to 2,916 sq. ft. The roof peek of the new attached accessory structure would be taller than the roof of the habitable area of the principle structure and typically accessory area height cannot exceed the habitable area of the principle structure. The removal and consolidation of accessory structure space is reasonable, but the size and design of the proposed home addition and accessory structure expansion would not be a reasonable use in a residential setting and would alter the character the neighborhood. (2) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by the landowner. The applicant has not established that there are unique circumstances or practical difficulties in complying with the code requirements for accessory structures on this property. (3) Granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the area or neighborhood where the property is located. The applicant proposes to roughly double the existing amount of accessory structure space through demolition and consolidation for a finished product of one principle building of 5396 square feet (2480 sq. ft. habitable-house and 2916 sq. ft. attached garage-accessory structure space). The size and appearance of the home addition and attached accessory structure expansion are not reasonable in a residential setting. The granting of the variance would alter the character of the neighborhood. (4) Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been discussed with the applicant. (5) There is inadequate access to direct sunlight for a solar energy system. The applicant previously installed a ground mounted solar panel array at another location on the property. There is adequate access to direct sunlight for a solar energy system. Based on the above criteria, staff is recommending denial of the variance based on the size and design of the combined home addition and accessory structure expansion. It would not be reasonable in a residential setting and would alter the character the neighborhood.

6C Page 3 Primary Issues/Alternatives to Consider: 1. Deny the Variance as recommended. 2. Approve the Variance. 3. Approve the Variance with modifications. Budgetary/Fiscal Issues: None Attachments: A. DRAFT RESOLUTION B. LOCATION MAP C. PLANNING & ZONING INFORMATION D. CITY PROPERTY SKETCH E. APPLICANT STATEMENT F. PLANS

6C RESOLUTION Page 4 RESOLUTION #2015- RESOLUTION DENYING THE VARIANCE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED FLOOR AREA OF ACCESSORY STRUCTURE FOR LOTS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AT 8015 SUNKIST BOULEVARD NORTH. Planning Commission File #15-127 WHEREAS, Jason and Gretchen Pruett have made application for a variance to exceed the maximum allowed floor area of accessory structure for lots greater than one acre at 8015 Sunkist Boulevard North, Brooklyn Park, MN, and legally described as: E 361 FT of Lot 015, SUNKIST ACRES Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the matter has been referred to the Planning Commission who have given their advice and recommendation to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the effect of the proposed use upon the health, safety and welfare of surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions and its effect on property values in the neighborhood have been considered. WHEREAS, the Review Standards, Practical Difficulties used in connection with the granting of a variance, means: (1) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance. (2) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by the landowner. (3) Granting of the variance will not alter the essential character of the area or neighborhood where the property is located. (4) Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. (5) There is inadequate access to direct sunlight for a solar energy system. WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the matter and makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions: 1. The Plans have not met the review standard for practical difficulties used in connection with the granting of a variance. 2. The size of the structure as proposed would not be reasonable in a residential setting. 3. The granting of the variance would alter the character of the neighborhood. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF BROOKLYN PARK that based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the applicant s request for a variance to exceed the maximum allowed floor area of accessory structure for lots greater than one acre at 8015 Sunkist Boulevard North is DENIED.

6C LOCATION MAP Page 5

6C PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION Page 6 Land Use Plan Current Zoning Surrounding Zoning Lot Size L Low Density Residential R2 - Detached Single-Family Estate District North: R2 Detached Single-Family Estate District East: R2 Detached Single-Family Estate District South: R2 Detached Single-Family Estate District West: R2 Detached Single-Family Estate District 72,185 sq. ft. or 1.66 acres Principle Structure Footprint 2,016 sq. ft. (1444 sq. ft. house, 88 sq. ft. glazed porch, 484 sq. ft. garage) Existing Building Area Proposed Building Area Neighborhood Conforms to: Land Use Plan Zoning Code Variances Needed Notification Distance Total: 2982 sq. ft. (Habitable - 1444 sq. ft. and Accessory 1538 sq. ft.) Accessory Space Breakdown - 484 sq. ft. attached, 966 sq. ft. detached Total: 5396 sq. ft. (2480 sq. ft. habitable and 2916 sq. ft. attached accessory) River Park Yes No Yes, to exceed the maximum allowed floor area of accessory structure for lots greater than one acre and the concept design shows the height of the proposed accessory structure exceeding the height of habitable area of the principle structure, which is typically not allowed. 100 feet

6C CITY PROPERTY SKETCH Page 7

6C APPLICANT STATEMENT Page 8

6C APPLICANT STATEMENT Page 9

6C PLANS Page 10

6C PLANS Page 11