UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Similar documents
Case 8:16-cv CJC-DFM Document 284 Filed 08/03/18 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:10028

Case 6:09-cv AA Document 2629 Filed 09/29/17 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:12-cv BSJ Document 1429 Filed 11/13/18 Page 1 of 17

Case 8:16-cv CJC-DFM Document 281 Filed 07/27/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:9937

Case 1:10-cv FAM Document 80 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/19/2012 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:06-cv Document 83 Filed 08/16/2007 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Case 4:11-cv Document 75 Filed in TXSD on 05/31/12 Page 1 of 9

Case 3:16-cv PK Document 591 Filed 03/14/18 Page 1 of 7

Case: 1:03-cv Document #: 824 Filed: 02/19/14 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:15009

BAY COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM DISPOSITION OF LIBRARY OWNED REAL PROPERTY POLICY

Case 2:12-cv BSJ Document 772 Filed 09/30/14 Page 1 of 14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Case 2:12-cv BSJ Document 102 Filed 12/28/12 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:12-cv BSJ Document 1430 Filed 11/13/18 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiff, Defendants.

STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT MILWAUKEE COUNTY. Plaintiffs, Case No. 17CV5769 MOTION TO APPROVE TRANSITION OF FACILITIES TO NEW OPERATORS

MOTION FOR AN ORDER APPROVING THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY FREE AND CLEAR OF LIENS, CLAIMS, ENCUMBRANCES AND INTERESTS

Case JMC-7A Doc 1133 Filed 01/31/17 EOD 01/31/17 13:25:18 Pg 1 of 10 SO ORDERED: January 31, 2017.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Appellant/Defendant, v. Case No. 12-C Appellant/Defendant. Case No.

NEW LEGISLATION 2017 Oregon Land Title Association Summary of Bills of Particular Interest to Title Companies

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

AUCTION MARKETING AGREEMENT

Case Doc 904 Filed 02/14/18 Entered 02/14/18 11:48:34 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Case reg Doc 40 Filed 06/20/16 Entered 06/20/16 14:20:14

Case 4:15-cv DLH-CSM Document 119 Filed 10/18/16 Page 1 of 14

REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE CONTRACT

H 7816 S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

H 7816 AS AMENDED S T A T E O F R H O D E I S L A N D

IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Minnesota State Colleges and Universities System Procedures Chapter 6 Facilities Management

Filing # E-Filed 08/03/ :13:06 PM

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO JUDGE DANIEL T. HOGAN. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Motion of Plaintiff Smart Federal

THIS CONTRACT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES AND THE PARTIES SHOULD CONSULT LEGAL AND TAX OR OTHER COUNSEL BEFORE SIGNING.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR CLAY COUNTY, FLORIDA

Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Case No. 1:17-cv FB Case No. 1:17-cv FB. Appellant, -against-

SAMPLE CONTRACT TO BUY AND SELL REAL PROPERTY

REAL ESTATE AUCTION PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT

CWCOT. REO ID: Property Address: Listing Agent: Brokerage Company: Buyer s Vesting: Buyer Contact: Buyer s Broker/Agent: National Title Vendor:

SEALED BID FORM AND SALE TERMS

NOTICE OF REGULATED WATER UTILITY SALE, TRANSFER, OR MERGER

Owners Full Name(s): (hereinafter, Sellers )"

THIS FORM HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES AND THE PARTIES SHOULD CONSULT LEGAL AND TAX OR OTHER COUNSEL BEFORE SIGNING.

8:19-cv LSC-CRZ Doc # 1 Filed: 01/30/19 Page 1 of 11 - Page ID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

Case 6:09-cv HO Document 1222 Filed 04/28/2010 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

Case 1:05-cv JDT-TAB Document Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 5

ANNUAL INVENTORY AND PROPERTY DISPOSITION REPORT For the Period Commencing February 2, 2014 and Ending February 1, 2015

Case 1:05-cv JDT-TAB Document 343 Filed 12/05/2007 Page 1 of 5

Case JMC-7A Doc 738 Filed 12/08/16 EOD 12/08/16 15:01:37 Pg 1 of 10 SO ORDERED: December 8, 2016.

(collectively, Urban Science ), through their undersigned counsel, hereby submit this limited

Town of Pittston Ordinance Regarding Tax Acquired Property

PROPERTY EXCHANGE AGREEMENT

Dartmouth College. Rennie Farm Value Assurance Program

Case 2:12-cv BSJ Document 627 Filed 04/04/14 Page 1 of 5

**** DISCLAIMER ****

REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

ARTICLE I 1. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY

ADDENDUM TO OFFER TO PURCHASE BETWEEN HOLIDAY LODGE OF WYEVILLE, INC., HOLIDAY LODGE R.V. PARK, INC. AND RAYMOND J.

Case 4:11-cv ALM Document 354 Filed 10/13/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 7630

(the Buyer ), offers for the Property the following amount in United States funds

Case 3:17-cv RS Document 385 Filed 04/27/18 Page 1 of 10

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION

REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

shl Doc 479 Filed 10/04/18 Entered 10/04/18 19:03:40 Main Document Pg 1 of 2

March 20, TO: All MAAO Members FROM: MAAO President Stephen C. Behrenbrinker, CAE, RE: MAAO-DOR Foreclosure Advisory Document

Sheriff Sale info from the Ohio Revised Code

Case 8:09-cv RAL-TBM Document 1300 Filed 07/06/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID 27542

PROPERTY DISPOSITION GUIDELINES OF STATE OF NEW YORK MORTGAGE AGENCY, ESTABLISHING STANDARDS FOR THE DISPOSITION AND REPORTING OF PROPERTY

rbk Doc#236 Filed 03/22/18 Entered 03/22/18 15:00:22 Main Document Pg 1 of 9

Keenan Auction Company

Case: 1:03-cv Document #: 894 Filed: 07/14/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:16961

KRS 324A A.150 Definitions for KRS 324A.150 to 324A.164. Effective: June 25, 2013

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY

UNOPPOSED ORDER GRANTING RECEIVER'S MOTION TO APPROVE THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY MAMC EMERALD CAY, LLC

Auction Terms and Conditions 2018 ONLINE AUCTION

VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS EXCLUSIVE AUTHORIZATION TO SELL

The terms and conditions of this letter of interest are as follows:

Knowledge Learning Corporation ( KLC ), by its undersigned counsel, hereby objects to

DEED OF TRUST PUBLIC TRUSTEE

Mold Masters Co., ( Mold Masters ) a creditor and party-in-interest in this case objects,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

504213AD1140 OWNER S NAME: Commercial Marking Systems LTD LEGAL DESCRIPTION:

City of Los Angeles CALIFORNIA

NOTICE OF SEALED BID FOR SALE OF REAL PROPERTY

REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT

CHAPTER 7 TAX SALES Public Auction, Sealed Bid Sale, Internet Auction. Presented by The State Controller s Office Burlingame, CA October, 2015

GENERAL ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS. THIS GENERAL ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS is made

THE TOWN OF VAIL EMPLOYEE HOUSING GUIDELINES

RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT for

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY 11-01

PRESS FIRMLY you are writing through 4 copies.

IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: SC LOWER CASE NUMBER: 3D THOMAS KRAMER, Petitioner,

Real Estate Procedures for Registered Online Bidders

AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE

Matagorda, TX Online & Live AUCTION

(the Buyer ), offers for the Property the following amount in United States funds

Transcription:

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. Plaintiff, GLOBAL ONLINE DIRECT, INC., BRYANT E. BEHRMANN and LARRY "BUCK" E. HUNTER, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:07-CV-0767-WSD NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ORDER (i) AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS, CLAIMS, INTERESTS AND ENCUMBRANCES,; (ii) AUTHORIZING THE RECEIVER TO PAY CERTAIN LIENS AND CLAIMS FROM THE SALE OF THE REAL PROPERTIES; (iii) RELIEVING THE RECEIVER FROM THE PROVISIONS OF 28 U.S.C. 2001-2002; AND (iv) APPROVING THE REAL ESTATE BROKER'S COMMISSION PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Michael A. Grassmueck (the "Receiver"), the duly appointed receiver for Global Online Direct, Inc. ("Global") and its subsidiaries Global Online Depository, Global Online SPIP, Global Online Auction Stores, Triple Diamond B, Bodaga Bay, Bodaga Bay Trucking, Inc., Catherine Crick Riders, Double B Broadcasting, Inc., The AM Show, Double B MPG, Global Online Direct, U Loan We Pay, and Bargain Hunter, Inc. and their subsidiaries and affiliates and any entities controlled by them (collectively referred to as the "Receivership Entities"), has moved this Court (the "Motion") for authorization to (i) sell certain real properties free and clear of all liens, claims, interests and encumbrances; (ii) pay certain liens and claims from the sale of the 2344123v1

real properties; (iii) relieve the Receiver from the provisions of 28 USC 2001-2002; and (iv) approve the real estate broker's commission. By the Motion, the Receiver requests that the Court authorize the sale of certain real properties of the receivership estate (the "Receivership Estate"), which consist of the real properties located at 460 W. Lincoln Street, Union, Oregon 97883 (the "Lincoln Property") and located at 499 E. Beakman Street, Union, Oregon 97883 (the "Beakman Property"), free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances, with such liens, claims and encumbrances attaching to the proceeds of sale. Pursuant to the Application (the "Employment Application") to Employ Property Manager and Real Estate Broker, filed on August 20, 2007, the Receiver previously sought the approval of the listing of the Lincoln Property and the Beakman Property, and other Receivership Estate properties, (collectively, the "Receivership Estate Properties") with real estate broker Mr. Roger Goodman of Century 21 Eagle Cap Realty (the "Broker"). The Broker's employment to market and sell the Lincoln Property and the Beakman Property (collectively, the "Lincoln and Beakman Properties") was approved by Court Order entered on October 30, 2007 (the "Broker Employment Order"). The Receiver, through his Broker, has found buyers for the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, and this Motion is submitted to seek approval of the sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, to the buyers. The Receiver submits this Motion to approve the sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties to the highest offers received for the Properties. The Receiver has obtained offers for the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, but such offers are subject to higher bids. To the extent that the Receiver obtains higher offers than the current offers, the Receiver seeks Court approval of sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties to the highest offers. The Receiver sells such Lincoln and 2344123v1

Beakman Properties "AS IS," "WHERE IS," and "WITH ALL FAULTS", and the Receiver makes no representations or warranties in respect to the condition of these Lincoln and Beakman Properties. Further, the Receiver requests that the Court authorize him to pay from the proceeds of sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, the valid liens, taxes, and any other claims, on the Properties, subject to any objections to such liens, taxes or claims by the Receiver. The Receiver also requests, by this Motion, that the Court waive the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2001(a) and 2002, which provide for the sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties pursuant to a foreclosure-type or public auction process. Further, the Receiver seeks waiver of the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2001(b) applying to private sales, including requiring certain appraisals, newspaper publications for the private sale, and confirmation of the private sale. In accordance with the Receiver's business judgment, the waivers of Sections 2001(a) and 2002 are appropriate. The most likely way for the Receiver to realize the highest prices for the sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties is through the commercially reasonable and customary method of listing the Properties with a broker and conducting a private sale. Further, the Receiver believes that listing and selling the Lincoln and Beakman Properties through a broker for the highest price offered, is the best method to obtain the highest and best price for the Properties, without having to incur the additional expenses in complying with Section 2001(b). Finally, the Receiver seeks authority to compensate the Broker in accordance with the listing agreement (the "Broker Agreement") at the applicable sales commission from the proceeds of sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties. The sales commission amounts are described in the Motion and in the Employment Application. The Employment Application was approved pursuant to the Broker Employment Order. The Broker Employment Order also approved the 2344123v1

Broker Agreement, and this Motion also seeks approval to pay the Broker his sales commission in accordance with such previously approved Broker Agreement. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that copies of the Motion can be viewed at or obtained from the Clerk of the Court, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, 75 Spring Street SW, Room 2211, Atlanta, GA 30303-3361, or by writing to counsel to the Receiver at the below-referenced address. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that the Motion is set without hearing, unless otherwise ordered by the Court pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(E), and any opposition shall be filed no later than ten (10) days after service of the Motion, excluding weekends and Court holidays, pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(B). Failure to file an opposition shall indicate that there is no opposition to the Motion pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(B). Dated: April 7, 2008 Respectfully submitted, /s/ David R. Zaro, Esq. David R. Zaro, Esq. Pro Hac Vice -- CA Bar No. 124334 dzaro@allenmatkins.com ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP 515 S. Figueroa Street, 7 th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-3398 Telephone: 213.622.5555 Facsimile: 213.620.8816 AND 2344123v1

/s/ Darryl S. Laddin, Esq. Darryl S. Laddin, Esq. Georgia Bar No. 460793 darryl.laddin@agg.com Frank N. White, Esq. Georgia Bar No. 753377 frank.white@agg.com ARNALL GOLDEN GREGORY LLP 171 17th Street, NW, Suite 2100 Atlanta, Georgia 30363 Telephone: 404.873.8500 Facsimile: 404.873.8121 Attorneys for Receiver, Michael A. Grassmueck 2344123v1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. Plaintiff, GLOBAL ONLINE DIRECT, INC., BRYANT E. BEHRMANN and LARRY "BUCK" E. HUNTER, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:07-CV-0767-WSD MOTION FOR ORDER (i) AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS, CLAIMS, INTERESTS AND ENCUMBRANCES,; (ii) AUTHORIZING THE RECEIVER TO PAY CERTAIN LIENS AND CLAIMS FROM THE SALE OF THE REAL PROPERTIES; (iii) RELIEVING THE RECEIVER FROM THE PROVISIONS OF 28 U.S.C. 2001-2002; AND (iv) APPROVING THE REAL ESTATE BROKER'S COMMISSION; AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF Michael A. Grassmueck (the "Receiver"), the duly appointed receiver for Global Online Direct, Inc. ("Global") and its subsidiaries Global Online Depository, Global Online SPIP, Global Online Auction Stores, Triple Diamond B, Bodaga Bay, Bodaga Bay Trucking, Inc., Catherine Crick Riders, Double B Broadcasting, Inc., The AM Show, Double B MPG, Global Online Direct, U Loan We Pay, and Bargain Hunter, Inc. and their subsidiaries and affiliates and any entities controlled by them (collectively referred to as the "Receivership Entities"),

hereby moves this Court (the "Motion") for authorization to (i) sell certain real properties free and clear of all liens, claims, interests and encumbrances; (ii) pay certain liens and claims from the sale of the real properties; (iii) relieve the Receiver from the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2001-2002; and (iv) approve the real estate broker's commission. I. INTRODUCTION. By this Motion, the Receiver requests that the Court authorize the sale of certain real properties of the receivership estate (the "Receivership Estate"), which are located at 460 W. Lincoln Street, Union, Oregon 97883 (the "Lincoln Property") and at 499 E. Beakman Street, Union, Oregon 97883 (the "Beakman Property"), free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances, with such liens, claims and encumbrances attaching to the proceeds of sale. Pursuant to the Application (the "Employment Application") to Employ Property Manager and Real Estate Broker, filed on August 20, 2007, the Receiver previously sought the approval of the listing of the Lincoln Property and the Beakman Property, and other Receivership Estate properties, (collectively, the "Receivership Estate Properties") with real estate broker Mr. Roger Goodman of Century 21 Eagle Cap Realty (the "Broker"). The Broker's employment to market and sell the Receivership Estate Properties was approved by Court Order entered on October 30, 2007 (the "Broker Employment Order"). The Receiver submits this Motion to approve the sale of the Lincoln Property and Beakman Property (the "Lincoln and Beakman Properties") to the highest offer received for such Properties. The Receiver has obtained offers for the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, but such offers are subject to higher bids. To the extent that the Receiver obtains higher offers than the current offers, the Receiver 2344099v1 2

seeks Court approval of sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties to the highest offers. The Receiver sells the Lincoln and Beakman Properties "AS IS," "WHERE IS," and "WITH ALL FAULTS", and the Receiver makes no representations or warranties in respect to the condition of the Properties. Further, the Receiver requests that the Court authorize him to pay from the proceeds of sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, the valid liens, taxes, and any other claims, on the Properties, subject to any objections to such liens, taxes or claims by the Receiver. The Receiver also requests, by this Motion, that the Court waive the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2001(a) and 2002, which provide for the sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties pursuant to a foreclosure-type or public auction process. Further, the Receiver seeks waiver of the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2001(b) applying to private sales, including requiring certain appraisals, newspaper publications for the private sale, and confirmation of the private sale. In accordance with the Receiver's business judgment, the waivers of Sections 2001(a) and 2002 are appropriate. The most likely way for the Receiver to realize the highest prices for the sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties is through the commercially reasonable and customary method of listing the Properties with a broker and conducting a private sale. Further, the Receiver believes that listing and selling the Properties through a broker for the highest price offered, is the best method to obtain the highest and best price for the Properties, without having to incur the additional expenses in complying with Section 2001(b). Finally, the Receiver seeks authority to compensate the Broker in accordance with the listing agreement (the "Broker Agreement") at the applicable 2344099v1 3

sales commission from the proceeds of sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties. The sales commission amounts are described below and in the Employment Application. The Employment Application was approved pursuant to the Broker Employment Order. The Broker Employment Order also approved the Broker Agreement, and this Motion also seeks approval to pay the Broker his sales commission in accordance with such previously approved Broker Agreement. II. STATEMENT OF FACTS. A. The SEC Action and Investigation of Global's Business Operations On April 25, 2007, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") commenced an action against the Defendants for violations of various federal securities laws. According to the SEC, the Defendants were involved in the fraudulent offer and sale of approximately $45 million of unregistered securities, beginning in October 2005. On June 4, 2007, this Court appointed Michael A. Grassmueck as receiver. Based on the Receiver's investigation, Global sold its inventory on consignment through a handful of retail outlets, but conducted its business on atypical terms. Global also sold some inventory via online auctions. There does not appear to have been financial analysis or reporting that reflects an evaluation as to the cost of the inventory acquired by Global versus the pricing of inventory sold. B. Global is Not Viable as an Ongoing Business From his investigation and analysis, the Receiver concluded that Global is not viable as an ongoing business concern. Global's lack of financial controls and record keeping coupled with inadequate working capital, and nonexistent business plans, do not make for a viable ongoing business. The Receiver therefore 2344099v1 4

concluded that Global cannot be sold as a going concern, and its assets must be sold for the benefit of the Receivership Estate. C. The Receivership Estate Properties and the Application to Employ Broker The Receiver previously identified at least twenty (20) separate real properties owned by the Receivership Entities. The Receiver conducted an extensive investigation and analysis in connection with the prospective sale of these properties. On August 20, 2007, the Receiver filed the Employment Application. Pursuant to the Employment Application, the Receiver identified the Lincoln and Beakman Properties on his list of the Receivership Estate Properties to be sold by the Broker. Further, pursuant to the Employment Application, and the Broker Agreement, the Receiver sought and obtained authority to pay the Broker a sales commission from the sale of the Receivership Estate Properties of six percent (6%), if the sales price is less than or equal to $200,000, and five and one half percent (5.5%) if the sales price is greater than $200,000. All sales of the Receivership Estate Properties are to be governed by the Receiver's Earnest Money Agreement, subject to Court approval. The Court entered the Broker Employment Order approving the Employment Application on October 30, 2007. D. The Marketing of the Receivership Estate Properties Through the Receiver's Broker, the Receiver marketed the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, along with other Receivership Estate Properties, by, among other things, listing them with several real estate listing services in Oregon, including "Real Estate Source", "The Real Estate Guide", and the "Home Builders Guide", listed them on the web at "GoodmanMLS", "Century 21. com", and the 2344099v1 5

"Realtor.com", and advertised them in a public newspaper, "The Observer", which is circulated in the area where the Properties are located. The Receiver's Broker also sent flyers to 980 of the Broker's clients in his efforts to market the Properties. The Properties were listed and advertised for a period of at least twenty-one (21) days, after which the Receiver began receiving offers to purchase the Properties. The Receiver accepted the highest offer for the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, subject to higher bids. The accepted offer was derived through armslength negotiations, and the Receiver believes that the accepted offers, at this time, are the best and highest offers that the Receivership Estate will receive for the Lincoln and Beakman Properties. However, the Receiver reserves the right to pursue higher and better offers to the extent they are received by the Receiver, and seeks as part of the Court's order authority to sell the Lincoln and Beakman Properties to the highest bidder. 1. Lincoln Property On or about January 26, 2008, the Receiver entered into the Receiver's Earnest Money Agreement, with proposed buyers Danny and Kristina Martens, for the sale of the Lincoln Property to the Martens. See Grassmueck Declaration, Exhibit "A". The Martens offered the amount of $97,000 for the purchase of the Lincoln Property. The Receiver counter-offered for the amount of $117,500 and requested that the Martens remove any contingencies to the sale of the Lincoln Property. See Grassmueck Declaration, Exhibit "B". Pursuant to the Addendum to the Agreement, executed on March 7, 2008, the Martens accepted the Receiver's counter-offer of $117,500, agreed to remove all contingencies to the sale, and desired to proceed with the sale of the Property. See Grassmueck Declaration, Exhibit "C". 2344099v1 6

The Martens have paid an earnest money deposit, and will pay the balance of the purchase price following Court approval of the sale of the Lincoln Property and at closing of the sale of the Property. The Earnest Money Agreement also provides at Section 3.2 that the Martens acknowledge that the sale of this Lincoln Property may be subject to higher bids. See Grassmueck Declaration, Exhibit "A". Since the purchase price is less than $200,000, the Broker would be entitled to a 6% commission from the sale of the Lincoln Property in accordance with the Broker Agreement. See Grassmueck Declaration, 8. The Receiver estimates a net return from the sale of the Lincoln Property of $111,693.48, after payment of the Broker's Commission of $3,525, closing charges of $1,200, and property taxes of $1,081.52. See Grassmueck Declaration, 10. 2. Beakman Property On or about January 9, 2008, the Receiver entered into the Receiver's Earnest Money Agreement, with proposed buyers Dennis Burnell and LaZelle Burnell (the "Burnells"), for the sale of the Beakman Property to the Burnells. See Grassmueck Declaration, Exhibit "D". The Burnells offered the amount of $65,000 for the purchase of the Beakman Property. As part of a counter-offer, the Receiver requested that the Burnells pay an earnest money deposit of $2,500 for the purchase of the Beakman Property. See Grassmueck Declaration, Exhibit "E". The Burnells accepted the counter-offer request and have paid the earnest money deposit, and will pay the balance of the purchase price following Court approval of the sale of the Beakman Property and at closing of the sale of the Property. The Earnest Money Agreement also provides at Section 3.2 that the Burnells acknowledge that the sale of this Beakman Property may be subject to higher bids. See Grassmueck Declaration, Exhibit "D". 2344099v1 7

Since the purchase price is less than $200,000, the Broker would be entitled to a 6% commission from the sale of the Beakman Property in accordance with the Broker Agreement. See Grassmueck Declaration, 13. The Receiver estimates a net return from the sale of the Beakman Property of $64,150, after payment of the Broker's Commission of $1,950, and closing charges of $1,100. See id. E. The Relief Requested Pursuant to the Application, and the Earnest Money Agreements, the sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties is subject to Court approval. Thus, pursuant to the Motion, the Receiver seeks Court approval of the sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances, with such liens, claims and encumbrances, if any, attaching to the proceeds of sale. Further, the Receiver requests that the Court authorize him to sell to the highest bidders for the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, and to pay from the proceeds of sale, the valid liens, taxes, and any other claims, on the Properties, subject to any objections to such liens, taxes, or claims by the Receiver. Further, the Receiver requests that the Court waive the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2001-2002, as discussed in Section IV below. III. THE SALE OF THE LINCOLN AND BEAKMAN PROPERTIES SHOULD BE AUTHORIZED. A. This Court has Authority to Order the Sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties. It is generally conceded that a court of equity having custody and control of property has power to order a sale of the same in its discretion. See, e.g., S.E.C. v. Elliott, 953 F.2d 1560, 1566 (11 th Cir. 1992) (the District Court has broad powers and wide discretion to determine relief in an equity receivership). "The power of sale 2344099v1 8

necessarily follows the power to take possession and control of and to preserve property." See also S.E.C. v. American Capital Invest., Inc., 98 F.3d 1133, 1144 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied 520 U.S. 1185 (decision abrogated on other grounds) (citing 2 Ralph Ewing Clark, Treatise on Law & Practice of Receivers 482 (3d ed. 1992)(citing First Nat'l Bank v. Shedd, 121 U.S. 74, 87 (1887)). "When a court of equity orders property in its custody to be sold, the court itself as vendor confirms the title in the purchaser." 2 Ralph Ewing Clark, Treatise on Law and Practice of Receivers 487). "A court of equity, under proper circumstances, has the power to order a receiver to sell property free and clear of all encumbrances." Miners' Bank of Wilkes-Barre v. Acker, 66 F.2d 850, 853 (2d Cir. 1933). See also, 2 Ralph Ewing Clark, Treatise on Law & Practice of Receivers 500 (3rd ed. 1992). To that end, a federal court is not limited or deprived of any of its equity powers by state statute. Beet Growers Sugar Co. v. Columbia Trust Co., 3 F.2d 755, 757 (9th Cir. 1925) (state statute allowing time to redeem property after a foreclosure sale not applicable in a receivership sale). Generally, when a court-appointed receiver is involved, the receiver, as agent for the court, should conduct the sale of the receivership property. Blakely Airport Joint Venture II v. Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp., 678 F. Supp. 154, 156 (N.D. Tex. 1988). The receiver's sale conveys "good" equitable title enforced by an injunction against the owner and against parties to the suit. See 2 Ralph Ewing Clark, Treatise on Law and Practice of Receivers 342, 344, 482(a), 487, 489, 491 (3d ed. 1992). "In authorizing the sale of property by receivers, courts of equity are vested with broad discretion as to price and terms." Gockstetter v. Williams, 9 F.2d 354, 357 (9th Cir. 1925). 2344099v1 9

Based on the information set forth above, this Court has the power to authorize the Receiver to sell the Lincoln and Beakman Properties free and clear of all liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances. The Receiver sells such Properties "AS IS," "WHERE IS," and "WITH ALL FAULTS" basis, and the Receiver makes no representations or warranties in respect to the condition of these Properties. Further, in conjunction with its broad equitable power in respect to authorizing the sale, the Receiver requests that the Court authorize him to the extent that higher offers are received, to sell to the highest bidders, and to pay from the proceeds of sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, the valid liens, taxes, and any other claims, on the Properties, subject to any objections to such liens, taxes, or claims by the Receiver. IV. THE RECEIVER SEEKS COURT APPROVAL OF THE RECEIVER'S ADDITIONAL REQUESTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE SALE OF THE LINCOLN AND BEAKMAN PROPERTIES The Receiver also requests, by this Motion, that the Court waive the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2001(a) and 2002, which provide for the sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties pursuant to a foreclosure-type or public auction process. Further, the Receiver seeks waiver of the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2001(b) applying to private sales, including requiring certain appraisals, newspaper publications for the private sale, and confirmation of the private sale. See Grassmueck Declaration, 16. In accordance with the Receiver's business judgment, the waivers of 28 U.S.C. 2001(a) and 2002 are appropriate and the most likely way for the Receiver to realize the highest prices for the sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties is through the commercially reasonable and customary method of listing 2344099v1 10

the Properties with a broker and conducting a private sale, as opposed to conducting a foreclosure-type sale. Further, the Receiver believes that listing and selling the Properties through a broker for the highest price offered, is the best method to obtain the highest price for the Properties, without having to incur the additional expenses for appraisal, publication, and confirmation, as set forth in Section 2001(b). See Grassmueck Declaration, 17. The Receivership Estate Properties were marketed and advertised in an effort to maximize the prices received, and after at least twenty-one (21) days of marketing and advertising, the Receiver began receiving offers for the purchase of the Properties. The Receiver accepted the highest offers for the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, subject to higher bids. The accepted offers were derived through arms-length negotiations and the Receiver believes that the accepted offers are the best and highest offers that the Receivership Estate will receive for the Properties. However, the Receiver reserves the right to pursue higher and better offers to the extent they are received by the Receiver, and seeks as part of the Court's order authority to sell the Lincoln and Beakman Properties to the highest bidders. The Receiver also seeks authority to compensate the Broker, in accordance with the Broker Agreement at the applicable sales commission, from the proceeds of sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, as described above and in the Application, filed on August 20, 2007, and as approved pursuant to Court Order, entered on October 30, 2007. Grassmueck Declaration, 18. 2344099v1 11

V. CONCLUSION. WHEREFORE, the Receiver requests that this Court enter an order for authorization to (i) sell certain real properties free and clear of all liens, claims, interests and encumbrances; (ii) pay certain liens and claims from the sale of the real properties; (iii) relieve the Receiver from the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 2001-2002; and (iv) approve the Broker's commission. Dated: April 7, 2008 Respectfully submitted, /s/ David R. Zaro, Esq. David R. Zaro, Esq. Pro Hac Vice -- CA Bar No. 124334 dzaro@allenmatkins.com ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP 515 S. Figueroa Street, 7 th Floor Los Angeles, California 90071-3398 Telephone: 213.622.5555 Facsimile: 213.620.8816 AND /s/ Darryl S. Laddin, Esq. Darryl S. Laddin, Esq. Georgia Bar No. 460793 darryl.laddin@agg.com Frank N. White, Esq. Georgia Bar No. 753377 frank.white@agg.com ARNALL GOLDEN GREGORY LLP 171 17th Street, NW, Suite 2100 Atlanta, Georgia 30363 Telephone: 404.873.8500 Facsimile: 404.873.8121 Attorneys for Receiver, Michael A. Grassmueck 2344099v1 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. Plaintiff, GLOBAL ONLINE DIRECT, INC., BRYANT E. BEHRMANN and LARRY "BUCK" E. HUNTER, Defendants. Civil Action No. 1:07-CV-0767-WSD ORDER ON MOTION FOR ORDER (i) AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES FREE AND CLEAR OF ALL LIENS, CLAIMS, INTERESTS AND ENCUMBRANCES,; (ii) AUTHORIZING THE RECEIVER TO PAY CERTAIN LIENS AND CLAIMS FROM THE SALE OF THE REAL PROPERTIES; (iii) RELIEVING THE RECEIVER FROM THE PROVISIONS OF 28 USC 2001-2002; AND (iv) APPROVING THE REAL ESTATE BROKER'S COMMISSION This Court, having reviewed the Receiver's motion for authorization to (i) sell certain real properties free and clear of all liens, claims, interests and encumbrances; (ii) pay certain liens and claims from the sale of the real properties; (iii) relieve the Receiver from the provisions of 28 USC 2001-2002; and (iv) approve the real estate broker's commission, (the "Motion"), and good cause appearing therefore, orders as follows: 1. The Motion is granted in its entirety. 2. The Receiver is authorized to sell the receivership estate properties located at 460 W. Lincoln Street, Union, Oregon 97883 (the "Lincoln Property") 2344183v1

and located at 499 E. Beakman Street, Union, Oregon 97883 (the "Beakman Property"). 3. The Receiver is authorized to sell the Lincoln Property and Beakman Property (collectively, the "Lincoln and Beakman Properties") to the highest offers received for such Properties. The Receiver sells such Lincoln and Beakman Properties "AS IS," "WHERE IS," and "WITH ALL FAULTS", and the Receiver makes no representations or warranties in respect to the condition of these Properties. 4. The Receiver is authorized to close the sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties and record the grant deeds necessary to deliver title to the subject Properties to the buyers with the highest offers for the Properties. The sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties shall be free and clear of all liens, claims, and encumbrances, with such liens, claims and encumbrances attaching to the proceeds of each sale. The Receiver is authorized to pay the valid liens, taxes, and claims on the Properties, subject to any objections to such liens, taxes, and claims by the Receiver. 5. The Court hereby relieves the Receiver from the provisions of 28 USC 2001-2002. 6. The Receiver is authorized to compensate the real estate broker Mr. Roger Goodman of Century 21 Eagle Cap Realty, in accordance with the listing agreement at the applicable sales commission from the proceeds of sale of the Lincoln and Beakman Properties, as set forth in the Motion and in the Receiver's Application to Employ Property Manager and Real Estate Broker, filed on August 20, 2007, which was approved by Court Order entered on October 30, 2007. 2344183v1

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: The Honorable William S. Duffey, Jr. United States District Court Judge 2344183v1