COLLEGE PARK AT MOUNTAIN HOUSE

Similar documents
Appendix D MOUNTAIN PARK SPECIFIC PLAN EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

A APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

(H) RM-10: LOW-DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 123

ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

25282 Baseline Street, San Bernardino

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

AGENDA SLOT HOME EVALUATION & TEXT AMENDMENT. 5:30 - Welcome

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

Appendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017

ZIMMERMAN/VOLK ASSOCIATES, INC. 17 East Main Street Clinton, New Jersey facsimile Research & Strategic Analysis

RIVER VALE MASTER PLAN PZ CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING JULY 19, 2017 CITY OF BEND

TOWNHOUSE. TYPICAL UNIT SIZE 1,200 to 1,600 square foot average unit (two to three stories) DENSITY dwelling units/acre without cottages

ZONING Matters. Zoning Determines. Citywide Zoning Workshop April 26, 2010 North Oakland West Oakland North Oakland Hills

NORTH PARK 2 UNITS WITH DEVELOPMENT DESIGN PLAN

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

Development Standards

LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 8.1 PURPOSE 8.2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS BY BUILDING TYPE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 7-1

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses

Article 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT


5219 Upper Middle Road, Burlington

City of Menifee EXPLORING DENSITY. General Plan Advisory Committee. July 8, :00 to 8:00 p.m. WHAT DOES DENSITY LOOK LIKE?

Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment

Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts

City of North Richland Hills Transit Oriented Development Code

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.

Bellingham Planning Commission April 30, 2009 Nicole Oliver, Communications Coordinator Tim Stewart, PCD Director

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

GENERAL ZONING CODE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MULTIPLE- DWELLING DEVELOPMENT

Article 19: Southeastern San Diego Planned District ( Southeastern San Diego Planned District added by O N.S.)

Appendix C Built Form Guidelines

1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request.

Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting #7 West Anaheim Youth Center May 26, 2016

PLANNING COMMISSION. Study Session: Beach Boulevard Specific Plan Workshop

Missing Middle Alternative Proposal: Olympians for Smart Development & Livable Neighborhoods

SECTION 3.1 ZONING DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED

South San Francisco Lanes Project. May 2, 2017 San Francisco State University Austin Gates, Ellen Edgar, Ziyun Li

Technical Study of Bellingham s Residential Development Code and Design Guidelines: Summary of Recommendations

Missing Middle Housing in Practice

UDO Advisory Committee Meeting #3 August 18, 2011

12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

CHAPTER 2: PEOPLE AND THEIR HOMES

Truax Park Apartments

CHAPTER RESIDENTIAL ZONES

Residential Design Standards and Guidelines

Development Standards

Chapter CC COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL ZONES REGULATIONS

9. MIXED HOUSING TYPES AND AFFORDABILITY

Article 7. URBAN CENTER (C-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ARTICLE 5.0 SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS

RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE NEIGHBORHOODS

City of Reno October 30, 2012 Draft Midtown Zoning Text Amendments 1

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ARTICLE 3: RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

Lacey UGA Residential density

SECTION 6. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Joel Rojas, Development Services Directo r~

CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

3.1 Existing Built Form

Anacortes, WA. 718 commercial ave. FOR lease. 2,320 +/- sf retail space in a 10,820 +/- sf building. Located in historic downtown Anacortes

PROTOTYPE HANDBOOK WEST BEND PROPERTY COMPANY LLC FEBRUARY 2015

Introduction. General Development Standards

DAVIDSON PLANNING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS AFTER SEPTEMBER 2009 SECTION 9

Barton Brierley, AICP, Director of Community Development (Staff Contact: Laurie Suess (707) )

Project Team. Community Workshop Draft Specific Plan Review West Anaheim Youth Center September 4, /6/2018.

CHAPTER SECOND UNITS

Sedro woolley, WA 720 MURDOCK ST. FOR sale. 14,500 +/- sf office building with 8,500 +/- sf unfinished basement space on 0.

YURCHESHEN RESIDENCE BZA APPLICATION

17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS SECTIONS:

Affordable Housing Bonus Program

Residential expansion revising the process

For Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario

Chapter URBAN VILLAGE ZONING DISTRICTS

ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS

Chapter DOWNTOWN ZONING DISTRICTS

City of North Richland Hills Transit Oriented Development Code

Cottage Court Subdivision

STAFF DESIGN REVIEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT


CHAPTER 8: HOUSING. Of these units, 2011 Census statistics indicate that 77% are owned and 23% are rental units.

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

ARTICLE 4: SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT, USE AND SETBACK REGULATIONS

Policy Issues City of Knoxville Zoning Code Update

A. Location. A MRD District may be permitted throughout the County provided it meets the standards established herein.

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

DIVISION 1.3 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP

CITY OF MURFREESBORO PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA

Community Open House March 8, 2017

Medium Density Condominium Residential Zone (RMD1 *CCC) Zone. Minimum lot frontage for Corner Lot

Please visit to learn more about these proposed overlay zone districts.

Transcription:

COLLEGE PARK AT MOUNTAIN HOUSE SPECIFIC PLAN III RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR POTENTIAL HOUSING PROTOTYPES DRAFT March 14, 2005

2 Draft 03/14/05

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR POTENTIAL HOUSING PROTOTYPES Mountain House Specific Plan III is proposed to include a wide range of housing types consistent with the goals of the Mountain House Master Plan. The array of size, density and plotting concepts is based on the following objectives: Provide housing for the various stages of family growth (singles, young couples, growing families, mature families and empty nesters) so that families are not forced to leave their community due to the lack of appropriate housing. Provide attainably priced housing for work force, young families and retirees by exploring higher density housing types such as condominiums, townhomes and combinations of the two. Strive to provide a variety of attainably priced single family detached housing which continues to be the most sought after housing form by the overall marketplace. Explore creative forms which help control price inflation by achieving higher densities, such as green court, alley load, two-pack, auto court and conventional small-lot detached. Achieve a diversity of neighborhood character through multiple housing sizes, densities and price points so that the overall village is experienced as a rich pattern of varied textures, street scenes and building forms. The following product array is representative of the Specific Plan III proposed residential prototypes, as shown in the Land Use Plan. Criteria for general lot size range, setbacks, building heights, and productspecific information are included to guide the individual builders in their housing developments. Builders are required to comply with the general intent of these guidelines. Draft 03/14/05 3

4 Draft 03/14/05

Draft 03/14/05 5

Product Type 1 Neighborhood A/B RL 7,000 SF Lots (70 x 100) SFD RL 6,000 SF Lots (60 x 100) SFD Product Criteria Lot Size Range Setbacks Minimum Conditions 6,000-7,500 SF Lot Front to Back of Sidewalks Porch / Courtyards 12 Living 15 Corner / Street Side 15 Side Setbacks 5 min. Rear Setbacks Living 22 min./25 avg. Garage Setback Shallow Recess 18 Swing-In 15 Rear 5 Building Height (2 and 3 Story) 35 Parking 2 spaces/du Architectural Styles Varied Elevation Styles Required 6 Draft 03/14/05

Draft 03/14/05 7

Product Type 2 Neighborhood A/B RL 5,400 SF Lots (60 x 90) SFD RL 5,000 SF Lots (55 x 90) SFD RL 5,000 SF Lots (50 x 100) SFD Product Criteria Lot Size Range Setbacks Minimum Conditions 5,000-6,000 SF Lot Front to Back of Sidewalks Porch / Courtyards 12 Living 15 Corner / Street Side 15 Side Setbacks 5 min. Rear Setbacks Living 20 min./23 avg. Garage Setback Shallow Recess 18 Swing-In 12 Rear 5 Building Height (2 and 3 Story) 35 Parking 2 spaces/du Architectural Styles Varied Elevation Styles Required 8 Draft 03/14/05

Draft 03/14/05 9

Product Type 3 Neighborhood A/B RM 4,400 SF Lots (40 x 110) Alley Loaded Product Criteria Lot Size Range Setbacks Minimum Conditions 4,000-5,000 SF Lot Front to Back of Sidewalks Porch / Courtyards 8 Living 10 Corner / Street Side 12 Side Setbacks 5 Rear Setbacks 4 Between Buildings 10 Garage Face to Garage Face 30 Porch to Porch 15 Side to Rear 30 Building Height (2 and 3 Story) 35 Parking 2 spaces/du Architectural Styles Varied Elevation Styles Required 10 Draft 03/14/05

Draft 03/14/05 11

Product Type 4 Neighborhoods A/B & D RM 4,700 SF Lots (55 x 85) Neighborhood D RM 4,000 SF Lots (45 x 90) SFD RM 4,000 SF Lots (50 x 80) SFD Product Criteria Lot Size Range Setbacks Minimum Conditions 4,000-4,800 SF Lot Front to Back of Sidewalks Porch / Courtyards 10 Living 12 Corner / Street Side 12 Side Setbacks 5 Rear Setbacks Living 10 min./15 avg. Garage Setback Shallow Recess 18 Rear 5 Building Height (2 and 3 Story) 35 Parking 2 spaces/du Architectural Styles Varied Elevation Styles Required 12 Draft 03/14/05

Draft 03/14/05 13

Product Type 5 Neighborhoods A/B & D RM 3,800 SF Lots (45 x 85) SFD Neighborhood D RM 3,500 SF Lots (50 x 70) SFD Product Criteria Lot Size Range Setbacks Minimum Conditions 3,500-4,000 SF Lot Front to Back of Sidewalks Porch / Courtyards 10 Living 12 Corner / Street Side 12 Side Setbacks 5 Rear Setbacks Living 10 min./15 avg. Garage Setback Shallow Recess 18 Rear 5 Building Height (2 and 3 Story) 35 Parking 2 spaces/du Architectural Styles Varied Elevation Styles Required 14 Draft 03/14/05

Draft 03/14/05 15

Product Type 6 Neighborhoods A/B & D RM 3,300 SF Lots (57.5 x 60) 4-Court (Greencourts) Product Criteria Lot Size Range Setbacks Minimum Conditions 3,300-4,000 SF Lot Front to back of sidewalks Porch / Courtyards 8 Living 10 Corner / Street Side 12 Side Setbacks 4 Rear Setbacks Living 7.5 Garage Setback Shallow Recess 18 Rear 5 Building Height (2 and 3 Story) 35 Private Open Space Requires 200 SF min. Open space/patio area Parking 2 spaces/du Architectural Styles Varied elevation styles Required 16 Draft 03/14/05

Draft 03/14/05 17

Product Type 7 Neighborhoods A/B RM 3,000 SF Lots (37 x 80) Alley Loaded Product Criteria Lot Size Range Setbacks Minimum Conditions 2,700-3,400 SF Lot Front to Back of Sidewalks Porch / Courtyards 10 Living 12 Corner / Street Side 15 Side Setbacks 5 Rear Setbacks Living 5 Garage Setback Rear Alley Drive 18 Rear 5 Building Height (2 and 3 Story) 35 Private Open Space Requires 200 SF min. Open space/patio area Parking 2 spaces/du Architectural Styles Varied Elevation Styles Required * At least one 1,350 1,420 square foot plan is required to comply with affordable housing goals. 18 Draft 03/14/05

Draft 03/14/05 19

Product Type 8 Neighborhoods A/B RM 2,700 SF Lots (33 x 80) Alley Loaded Greencourt Product Criteria Lot Size Range Setbacks Minimum Conditions 2,000-3,200 SF Lot Front to Back of Sidewalks Porch / Courtyards 8 Living 10 Side Setbacks 10 Rear Setbacks 5 Between buildings Garage Face to Garage Face 30 Courtyards Minimum Dimensions 20 Common Area Building Height (2 and 3 Story) 35 Private Open Space Requires 200 SF min. Open space/patio area Parking 2 spaces/du Architectural Styles Varied Elevation Styles Required 20 Draft 03/14/05

Draft 03/14/05 21

Product Type 9 Neighborhood D RM 2,900 SF Lots (42 x 72) 2-Pack Product Criteria Lot Size Range Setbacks Minimum Conditions 2,650-3,375 SF Lot Front to Back of Sidewalks Porch / Courtyards 8 Living 10 Corner / Street Side 11 Side Setbacks 4 Rear Setbacks 4 Living 10 min./15 avg. Garage Setback Front 18 Rear 4 Building Height (2 and 3 Story) 35 Parking 2 spaces/du Architectural Styles Varied Elevation Styles Required 22 Draft 03/14/05

Draft 03/14/05 23

Product Type 10 Neighborhoods A/B RMH Townhomes Product Criteria Density Range Setbacks Minimum Conditions 12-15 du/ac Front to Back of Sidewalks Porch and Balconies 8 Living 10 Side Setbacks 12 Rear Setbacks 15 Between buildings Side to Side 15 Garage Face to Garage Face 30 Rear to Face 24 Front to Front 50 Porch to Porch 20 Side to Front 20 Side to Rear 30 Building Height (2 and 3 Story) 35 Private Open Space Requires 150 SF min. Open space/patio area Parking 1.5 spaces/du Architectural Styles Varied Elevation Styles Required 24 Draft 03/14/05

Draft 03/14/05 25

Product Type 11 Neighborhood D RH Apartments/Condos Product Criteria Density Range Setbacks Minimum Conditions 18-24 du/ac Front to Back of Sidewalks Porch 6 Living 10 Side Setbacks 12 Rear Setbacks 15 Between buildings Side to Side 15 Garage Face to Garage Face 30 Rear to Rear 24 Front to Front 24 (30 avg.) Porch to Porch 15 Side to Front 20 Side to Rear 30 Building Height (2 and 3 Story) 35 Private Open Space Requires 100 SF min. Open space/patio area Parking 1.5 spaces/du Architectural Styles Varied Elevation Styles Required 26 Draft 03/14/05

Draft 03/14/05 27

DESIGN GUIDELINES REFERENCE The Design Guidelines for Specific Plan III are referenced to the following manuals and reports to achieve the general design intent for the community. Public Facilities: MHCSD Design Manual Adopted January 22, 2002 Parks and Recreation: MHCSD Parks, Recreation and Leisure Plan Adopted May 10, 2004 Single Family Residential: Mountain House Single Family Residential Design Manual Received San Joaquin County Staff Administrative Approval July 22, 2003 Developed by Trimark Communities Multi-Family Residential: Mountain House Multi-Family Development Design Manual Received San Joaquin County Staff Administrative Approval March 19, 2004 Developed by Trimark Communities Commercial, Office and Industrial Development: Mountain House Commercial, Office and Industrial Design Manual Received San Joaquin County Staff Administrative Approval October 6, 2003 Developed by Trimark Communities 28 Draft 03/14/05