Tulsa County Public Service Net Values

Similar documents
State Housing Trust Fund Revenues 2017

Business Creation Index

NCSL TABLE REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAXES

Your Guide to Real Estate Customs by State

State Tax Credits for Historic Preservation A State-by-State Summary. States with income tax incentives States that do not tax income

Your Guide to. Real Estate. Customs by State

What is Proper Tax Policy for Smokeless Tobacco Products?

CBRE INDUSTRIAL & LOGISTICS SPECIAL PROPERTIES GROUP

Alabama. Alaska. Arizona. Arkansas. California. Colorado

SPECIAL PROPERTIES GROUP INDUSTRIAL SERVICES

Administration > Exemption Certificate Validity Periods

I. The Affordability Problem in Boston II. What is Affordable? III.Housing Costs IV.Housing Production V. What Can Public Policy Do? I.

What Is Proper Tax Policy for Smokeless Tobacco Products?

No Survey Required w/ Survey. Affidavit. Affidavit. Affidavit

MULTIFAMILY TAX SUBSIDY PROJECT INCOME LIMITS

The Subject Section. Chapter 2. Property Address

Medicaid Prescription Reimbursement Information by State Quarter Ending June 2010

AGRICULTURAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT PROGRAM AGRICULTURAL LAND EASEMENTS

REQUIRED WITNESSES FOR A MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST

ALI-ABA Course of Study Commercial Lending and Banking Law January 29-31, 2009 Scottsdale, Arizona

Nevada Single Document Rule

TO: Rural Development State Directors

Phoenix, Central and Northern Arizona

VERMONT S RENTAL HOUSING AFFORDABILITY GAP CONTINUES TO GROW The Average Vermont Renter Can t Afford a Modest 2-Bedroom Apartment

Paper for presentation at the 2005 AAEA annual meeting Providence, RI July 24-27, 2005

Status of State PACE Programs

Goomzee Corporation Fall MLS Platforms. America s MLS Platform Vendors & Market Distribution. Goomzee Research

STATUS OF STATE PACE PROGRAMS

National Foreclosure Report

Citizen s Activity Sheet

APPLICATION FOR LEASE OF APARTMENT EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY

National Foreclosure Report

U.S. Home Price Insights Report

Understanding Whom the LIHTC Program Serves

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

TUCSON and SOUTHERN ARIZONA

Sources Consulted. International Association of Assessing Officers Standard on Ratio Studies (draft version). February.

REPORT TO COUNCIL City of Sacramento

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Foreclosures Copyright 2014 Rogue Investor

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Automatic Renewal Laws in All 50 States Index

Federal Rental Assistance Provides Affordable Homes for Vulnerable People in All Types of Communities

Good design makes a difference

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Collateral Risk Network Review Panel Discussion

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. Fair Housing. It s Your Right

State Guide To Tax Lien And Tax Deed Investing

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

OKLAHOMA AD VALOREM MILL LEVIES,

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

The Voice of the 1031 Industry

The only dedicated operating revenue source for cities in Oklahoma is sales tax. While many cities utilize Ad Valorem (property tax) taxes for

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

District Facilities and Public Charter Schools

City Housing Trust Fund Revenues 2018

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Marijuana and Real Estate: A Budding Issue

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Testimony on OH HB 323, Foreclosure Reform, November, 2009

Horry County Personal Property Return 2017

More details >>> HERE <<<

The following is a review of the law of land trusts in all fifty states:

The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program Bruce Katz, Director

STATE POLICY SNAPSHOT

The Cost of Value: PV and Property Tax Policy. Justin Barnes North Carolina Solar Center/DSIRE World Renewable Energy Forum 2012 Denver, CO

Gardner Business Review May 2018 Applied economic analysis by the David Eccles School of Business

Black Knight Home Price Index Report: December Transactions U.S. Home Prices Up 0.1 Percent for the Month; Up 8.4 Percent Year-Over-Year

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

(904) (904)

Black Knight Home Price Index Report: October Transactions U.S. Home Prices Up 0.1 for the Month; Up 4.5 Percent Year-Over-Year

Understanding Mississippi Property Taxes

Black Knight Home Price Index Report: December Transactions U.S. Home Prices Down 0.1 Percent for the Month; Up 4.5 Percent Year-Over-Year

ABOUT THE UNITED TRUSTEE ASSOCIATION

Vertical File Finding Aid 1. Vertical File. Art and Architecture Collection. New York Public Library

Wilcomb E. Washburn Papers,

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Taxing Construction. Are you Setting the Stage for Irreparable Consequences? 2017 IPT Annual Conference Charlotte, North Carolina

(904) (904)

issues key STATE ADVOCACY

More details >>> HERE <<<

(904) (904)

APPLICATION FOR LEASE OF APARTMENT EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY

(904) (904)

City of Boerne, Texas Incentives Policy

Short Sale Guide. The real estate agent faxes the complete Short Sale Package to , Attn: Setup.

STATE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING

MSSP. Market Segment Specialization Program. Rehabilitation Tax Credit

Can Government Open More Doors for Borrowers?

Chapter 3 Real and Personal Property. Louisiana Mid-Continent Oil and Gas Association and Louisiana Oil and Gas Association

Shawnee Landing TIF Project. City of Shawnee, Kansas. Need For Assistance Analysis

The Economic & Fiscal Impacts of the Blanche Hotel Redevelopment Project

Steve Leimberg's Asset Protection Planning Newsletter - Archive Message #190 Date: From: Subject:

Transcription:

Tulsa County Public Service Net Values Source: Assessor s Report to the Excise Board (Net Assessment) CITIES & TOWNS 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 5 Yr Chg BIXBY 8,817,889 8,277,095 6,633,728 6,791,304 6,605,012 6,820,378-22.65% BROKEN ARROW 22,948,152 20,067,592 17,418,147 13,902,641 17,689,157 18,859,608-17.82% COLLINSVILLE 916,431 861,557 689,153 626,135 594,253 599,682-34.56% GLENPOOL 2,910,727 2,886,223 3,240,950 3,509,332 3,469,492 5,322,847 82.87% JENKS 32,537,846 33,002,811 25,424,472 25,591,728 25,704,723 27,756,620-14.69% LIBERTY 274,660 273,572 296,618 262,663 235,901 228,431-16.83% OWASSO 6,094,803 5,065,860 4,308,823 4,316,180 4,434,913 4,661,600-23.52% SAND SPRINGS 7,978,972 7,458,988 6,234,484 6,211,826 6,377,033 6,922,508-13.24% SAPULPA 112,112 121,007 116,879 138,397 141,578 159,185 41.99% SKIATOOK 775,996 581,739 493,863 682,377 696,748 666,195-14.15% SPERRY 1,014,042 1,292,185 1,909,006 1,940,349 1,843,459 1,721,826 69.80% TULSA 192,985,207 151,147,389 130,980,865 131,772,316 147,579,716 152,776,286-20.84% SUBTOTAL 277,366,837 231,036,018 197,746,988 195,745,248 215,371,985 226,495,166-18.34% UNINCORPORATED AREAS 67,834,153 65,847,790 59,168,198 54,296,552 58,205,308 60,766,607-10.42% TOTAL: 345,200,990 296,883,808 256,915,186 250,041,800 273,577,293 287,261,773-16.78% -14.00% -13.46% -2.68% +9.41% +5.00% Revised 8-4-17 1 of 17

Tulsa County Public Service Net Values Source: Assessor s Report to Excise Board (Net Assessment) SCHOOL DISTRICTS 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 5 Yr Chg #01-TULSA 185,371,836 145,070,442 126,271,415 124,717,439 139,598,373 144,744,270-21.92% #02-SAND SPRINGS 10,299,232 9,906,918 8,443,035 8,585,214 8,930,147 9,597,306-6.82% #03-BROKEN ARROW 23,269,453 20,894,224 18,515,458 14,644,932 18,983,418 20,134,679-13.47% #04-BIXBY 16,276,361 14,733,236 10,550,643 10,033,137 9,852,325 10,268,246-36.91% #05-JENKS 47,103,471 45,658,686 35,581,902 36,186,903 37,352,117 39,720,193-15.67% #06-COLLINSVILLE 2,492,813 2,047,246 1,816,490 1,646,234 1,647,413 1,786,188-28.35% #07-SKIATOOK 883,414 798,357 764,117 905,952 925,731 953,444 7.93% #08-SPERRY 2,165,734 2,549,224 3,224,870 3,289,933 3,200,287 3,123,537 44.23% #09-UNION 21,252,456 19,160,939 16,546,904 16,351,844 18,150,870 19,086,696-10.19% #10-BERRYHILL 9,788,183 11,232,321 11,599,241 10,803,566 12,043,359 12,612,953 28.86% #11-OWASSO 19,316,804 17,757,237 16,216,975 15,648,314 15,576,205 16,000,715-17.17% #13-GLENPOOL 5,530,165 5,747,416 6,102,892 5,966,707 5,989,810 7,791,487 40.89% #14-LIBERTY 562,197 602,707 610,655 565,916 547,535 648,860 15.42% #15-KEYSTONE 888,871 724,855 670,589 695,709 779,703 793,199-10.76% TOTAL: 345,200,990 296,883,808 256,915,186 250,041,800 273,577,293 287,261,773-16.78% -14.00% -13.46% -2.68% +9.41% +5.00% Revised 8-4-17 2 of 17

Tax Increment Financing Source: County Treasurer s Office and City Governments Provided for by the Local Development Act, 62 O.S. 850 1. Brady Village Performance level 153.4% Designed to become an Arts & Entertainment District in conjunction with the Brady Theatre and the Cain s Ballroom The projected tax over the life of TIF: $4,533,702 (sales & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $5,683,0009 sales tax $1,270,178 Term: 1993-2017 (Paid off Jun. 2017) (Closed Jul. 18, 2017) 4. Cimarron Center Performance level 16.1% For development and redevelopment of the Cimarron Center site to attract businesses and revitalize the area. The projected tax over the life of TIF: $13,857,705 (sales & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $624,922 sales tax $1,602,181 Term: 2001-2011 (Paid off Oct. 2006) (Closed Feb. 7 2007) 2. Central Park Performance level 123.4% Partnering with the Home Depot Downtown to improve the district with streetscaping (lighting, sidewalks, benches, signage, etc.) and utility improvements The projected tax over the life of TIF: $7,446,924 (sales & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $961,437 sales tax $8,231,183 Term: 1994-2009 (Paid off Jun 2009) (Closed Feb. 11, 2010) 5. North Peoria Performance level 73.9% Revitalize an underserved area of Tulsa with public improvements The projected tax over the life of TIF: $7,860,978 (sales & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $4,262,220 sales tax $1,545,431 Term: 2002-2017 (Paid off Jun. 2017) (Closed Jan. 10, 2018) 3. Tulsa Technology Performance level 28.8% Created to provide public infrastructure for high-tech corporate headquarters in downtown to support business expansion. The projected tax over the life of TIF: $26,296,401 (ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $7,247,093 sales tax $339,216 Sales Tax was collected for one year only Term: 1999-2014 (Paid off Dec. 2014) (Closed Jan. 15, 2015) 6. Blue Dome Performance level 240.2% Planned public improvements for streetscaping (lighting, sidewalks, benches, signage, etc.) and fire suppression assistance grants The projected tax over the life of TIF: $1,501,911 (sales & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $1,118,504 sales tax: $2,489,282 Term: 2003-2017 (Paid Off Mar. 2016) (Closed Apr. 1, 2016) Note: All collections from inception thru December 2017. Countywide collections total $74,236,247 and Countywide projections total $748,327,340 for an overall Performance level 9.9% Revised 1-22-18 3 of 17

Tax Increment Financing Source: County Treasurer s Office and City Governments Provided for by the Local Development Act, 62 O.S. 850 7. Tulsa Hills Performance level 16.3% Construction of a storm water drainage facilities, facilities, earthwork, and other public improvements for the 695,000 sq. ft. retail center at HWY 75 and 71 st Street The projected tax over the life of TIF: $170,446,000 (sales & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $12,356,492 sales tax $15,464,356 Term: 2006-2021 (Ad Valorem Terminated in 2015) 8. Jenks One Performance level 115.5% Development of roadways, sewer and other public improvements to increase marketability for development The projected tax over the life of TIF: $2,376,166 (ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $2,743,781 sales tax N/A Term: 2006-2017 (Extended for another 13 years) Performance level N/A 10. Broken Arrow Flightsafety & Downtown Economic Development One Promote economic development and job creation, including the retention and relocation of FlightSafety, and the acquisition of redevelopment sites and implementation of public improvements in the downtown area The projected tax over TIF life: $ (sales & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $4,058,087 sales tax $1,111,794 Term: 2010-2036 Performance level 22.2% 11. Sand Springs Webco Industries Economic Development Two Promote economic development and job creation, including the construction of a new facility for Webco Industries, and the acquisition of redevelopment sites and implementation of public improvements in the Star Center industrial area The projected tax over TIF life: $11,511,000 (ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $2,364,181 sales tax $187,290 Sales Tax was collected for one year only Term: 2011-2036 9. Jenks Two Performance level 0.0% Provides area with stability and market potential for further development The projected tax over TIF life: $294,469,879 (sales & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $0 sales tax $0 Term: 2008-2025 Note: All collections from inception thru December 2017. 12. Jenks Three Performance level 0.3% Provide the funding necessary to upgrade and extend water, sewer, storm drainage, roadways, environmental resolutions/mitigations, make necessary floodplain modifications and other improvements to serve as a catalyst for retaining or expanding employment, to reverse economic stagnation or decline, to attract major investment in the area and to preserve or enhance the tax base in the area of the district The projected tax over the life of TIF: $26,194,540 (sales & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $80,776 sales tax $0 Term: 2014-2029 Countywide collections total $74,236,247 and Countywide projections total $748,327,340 for an overall Performance level 9.9% Revised 1-22-18 4 of 17

Tax Increment Financing Source: County Treasurer s Office and City Governments Provided for by the Local Development Act, 62 O.S. 850 13. Jenks Four Performance level 0.0% Provide the funding necessary to upgrade and extend water, sewer, storm drainage, roadways, environmental resolutions/mitigations, pipeline removal and/or relocations and other improvements to serve as a catalyst for retaining or expanding employment, to reverse economic stagnation or decline, to attract major investment in the area and to preserve or enhance the tax base in the area of the district The projected tax over the life of TIF: $76,662,134 (sales & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $33,817 sales tax $0 Term: 2014-2030 16. Tulsa Airport D Performance level 1.5% Support the area s aerospace economy and generate additional, related private investment in the area through new public infrastructure taxilanes, hangars, storage facilities, water and sewer lines, access roads, and building pads The projected tax over the life of TIF: $14,000,000 (sales & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $4,064 sales tax $207,094 Term: 2017-2041 14. Sapulpa Four Performance level 3.1% Extend public infrastructure improvements including water, sewer and roadways, in the area commonly know as Polson Industrial Park to spur its further development The projected tax over the life of TIF: $5,670,000 (ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $174,437 sales tax N/A Term: 2015-2030 17. Owasso Redbud Performance level 0.1% Develop the area surrounding Main Street, achieve the City s development objectives, improve the quality of life for its citizens, stimulate private investment, and enhance the tax base The projected tax over the life of TIF: $21,500,000 (sale & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $10,920 sales tax $1,743 Term: 2017-2041 15. Santa Fe Square Performance level 0.1% Develop a mixed use project including a substantial retail component, apartments, Class A office space, a full-service boutique hotel, and over 1,100 structured parking spaces The projected tax over the life of TIF: $64,000,000 (sales & ad valorem) Actual collections: ad valorem tax $62,714 sales tax $46 Term: 2016-2040 Note: All collections from inception thru December 2017. Countywide collections total $74,236,247 and Countywide projections total $748,327,340 for an overall Performance level 9.9% Revised 1-22-18 5 of 17

Incentive Districts Source: County and City Government The Local Development Act, 62 O.S. 850, provides for the granting of incentives and exemptions from taxation within certain areas where investment, development, and economic growth is difficult. Duration Status Market Value Exempted 2017 Taxable 1.Pioneer Village-City of Jenks 1997-2001 Ended $7,479,500 $640,927 2. Ambassador Hotel-City of Tulsa 1999-2003 Ended $14,596,000 $4,910,300 3. Hamilton Office Building-City of Tulsa 1999-2003 Ended $13,048,100 $3,419,200 4. Tulsa Uptown-City of Tulsa 1999-2004 Ended $39,004,200 $9,820,000 5. Cardinal Heights-City of Collinsville 2001-2005 Ended $9,507,500 $867,100 6. Autumn Park-City of Bixby 2002-2006 Ended $9,564,500 $1,233,600 7. Redbud Village-City of Glenpool 2009-2013 Ended $11,655,000 $749,500 8. EDS-Tulsa County 2009-2013 Ended $613,708,300 $149,880,200 9. Mayo Hotel and Lofts LP-City of Tulsa 2010-2015 Ended $180,927,600 $36,738,600 10. Mayo 420-City of Tulsa 2011-2016 Ended $42,120,000 $8,087,100 11. Atlas Life-City of Tulsa 2011-2016 Ended $50,256,600 $9,438,200 Totals for Ended Districts $991,867,300 $225,800,727 12. Greenarch LLC-City of Tulsa 2014-2019 Active $26,001,900 N/A 13. Coliseum LLC-City of Tulsa 2016-2021 Active $2,532,900 N/A 14. Macy s Corporate Service 2016-2020 Active $338,270,900 N/A 15. Art Deco Lofts & Apts LLC-City of Tulsa 2017-2022 Active $2,458,600 N/A 16. Palace Bldg LLC (newsprint bldg)-city of Tulsa 2017-2022 Active $2,300,000 N/A Totals for Active District $371,564,300 N/A 6 of 17 Revised 7-11-17

Tulsa County Ad Valorem By Type Source: County Assessor s Abstract of Tax Rolls FY 1997-98 FY 2007-08 Real (74%) $208,083,581 Personal (15%) $42,465,468 Central (11%) $32,512,275 Total Taxes $283,061,324 Real (79%) $416,332,593 Personal (14%) $71,325,793 Central (7%) $39,607,229 Total Taxes $527,265,615 FY 2012-13 FY 2017-18 Real (81%) $515,938,963 Personal (12%) $78,977,286 Central (7%) $42,853,250 Total Taxes $637,769,499 Real (82%) $633,372,212 Personal (13%) $100,633,227 Central (5%) $37,080,701 Total Taxes $771,086,140 Revised 10-25-17 7 of 17

Tulsa County Ad Valorem Tax By User Source: County Fiscal Office and County Treasurer s Office FY 2012-2013 FY 2017-2018 Career Tech County Gen 10.45% Fund 8.10% City-County Health 2.02% City-County Library 4.17% Community College 5.65% City 15.80% County Gen Fund 7.54% City-County Health 1.88% City-County Library 3.88% Career Tech 9.72% Community College 5.26% City 16.37% Schools K-12 53.81% Total Property Taxes Collected $637,769,499 School K-12 55.34% Total Property Taxes Estimated $771,086,140 Note: Largest growth has been Schools K-12 (55.34% - 53.81% = 1.53%) as a portion of countywide property taxes. Largest decrease has been Career Tech (9.72% - 10.45% = -0.72%). Revised 10-25-17 8 of 17

Mills (Tax Levy) & Demand for Taxes Source: Assessor s Office What is a mill? One mill= 1/1,000 of a dollar One mill generates $1 in revenue for every $1,000 in Net Assessed Taxable Valuation Net Assessed Taxable Valuation is: Taxable Value x Assessment Ratio less any Exemptions Example: Fair Market Value $100,000 Taxable Value $90,000 Assessment Ratio x 11% 9,000 Less Homestead Exemption 1,000 Net Assessed Taxable Value $8,000 Net Assessed Taxable Valuation x Millage Rate (fixed and variable)= Taxes Collected Ex. $8,000 (net assessed taxable valuation) x mills (tax levy) = $ (tax to be collected) In other words, taxes to be collected are: $8,000 x.135 = $1,080 in this example, if the tax levy is 135 mills. Tax Levies are two types: fixed mills voted by citizens; and mills calculated each year to retire bonds and other legal judgments (these vary each year to ensure collection of fixed dollar amounts!) Demand for Money Net Assessed Taxable Valuation = Millage Rate (fixed and variable) Ex. $771,086,140 (Approved by Excise Bd for 2017) $5,864,743,980 (County Total Valuation) = 131.48 Weighted Average Mill levy for Tulsa County) The Excise Board annually receives and approves the demand for taxes from every school, city, and other countywide entities, i.e. county general fund, the library, health, community college, and technology center. Revised 10-26-17 9 of 17

TAX AMOUNT $800,000,000 $750,000,000 $700,000,000 $650,000,000 $600,000,000 $550,000,000 $500,000,000 $450,000,000 $400,000,000 $350,000,000 $300,000,000 $250,000,000 $200,000,000 $150,000,000 $100,000,000 $50,000,000 Property Taxation 102 Tulsa County Ad Valorem Tax By Levies Source: County Assessor s Abstract of Tax Rolls Countywide School ADA School Building Fund FY 2017-18 $162,719,363 $178,475,639 $99,206,944 $23,458,976 $29,323,720 County Operations $58,647,440 School General Fund $205,266,039 LOCAL "FIXED" MILLAGE (Permanent)---------------------------------------21% City-County Health ( 2.50) $14,661,860 City-County Library ( 5.20) $30,496,669 Tulsa Community College ( 7.00) $41,053,208 Career Tech(General & Bldg) (13.00) $76,241,672 Glenpool EMS ( 3.00) $265,954 LOCAL PROJECTS (Varies Annually)------------------------------------------23% School Sinking Fund (K-12) (6.96 to 33.50) $178,475,639 CITY SINKING FUNDS (Varies Annually)-------------------------------------13% ANNUAL OBLIGATIONS & COURT JUDGEMENTS (NOT VOTED) Collinsville (0.00) $0 Glenpool (0.00) $0 Skiatook (0.00) $0 Sperry (0.00) $0 Owasso (0.04) $10,262 Sand Springs (5.99) $798,077 Jenks (11.94) $3,258,948 Bixby (13.11) $3,380,487 Sapulpa (13.45) $70,920 Broken Arrow (16.84) $12,511,167 Tulsa (22.44) $79,177,082 HOUSEHOLD PERSONAL PROPERTY (Revenue Netutral in 1994)----2% School District Building Fund (0.15 to 0.30) $1,634 to $366,906 School District General Fund (1.05 to 2.10) $11,440 to $2,568,341 Health, Library, TCC, TTC & Glenpool EMS (0.08 to 0.33) $7,979 to $1,935,366 County Government (0.30) $1,759,423 $13,753,933 STATEWIDE MILLAGE (Permanent)-------------------------------------------41% $316,696,175 Countywide (K-12) School ADA Levy (4.00) School (K-12) District Building Fund (5.00) County (Assessor, BOCC, County Clerk, Court Clerk, Sheriff, & Treasurer) (10.00) $0 Demand for Property Taxes $771,086,140 (Based on Excise Board Approved Tax Levies) Revised 10-26-17 10 of 17 County "Weighted" Average $131.48 mills

Tulsa County Tax Apportionment Source: County Treasurer s Office 10 year Entity 2006-2007 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Change Berryhill Fire District $243,352 $756,707 $774,404 $778,278 219.8% City of Sapulpa $49,200 $71,946 $57,388 $132,318 168.9% City of Tulsa $34,216,654 $72,086,106 $76,778,299 $73,078,014 113.6% Glenpool School District $2,703,642 $5,055,070 $5,323,246 $5,668,867 109.7% Collinsville School District $2,265,134 $3,964,323 $4,364,714 $4,577,825 102.1% Drainage District 12 -- Sand Springs $394,116 $1,189,132 $1,289,042 $793,450 101.3% Skiatook School District $508,349 $883,298 $911,201 $989,026 94.6% Glenpool Emergency Medical Service $133,130 $220,685 $233,843 $247,035 85.6% Liberty School District $412,048 $611,587 $653,100 $753,155 82.8% Berryhill School District $1,625,244 $2,641,495 $2,711,512 $2,855,292 75.7% City of Broken Arrow $7,356,181 $11,641,028 $11,967,181 $12,556,302 70.7% Broken Arrow School District $23,519,931 $36,003,191 $37,363,218 $39,909,166 69.7% City of Jenks $2,470,800 $3,982,663 $3,902,069 $3,913,043 58.4% Bixby School District $19,384,661 $24,055,023 $25,806,477 $29,539,358 52.4% City of Bixby $1,790,967 $2,759,479 $2,847,417 $2,726,156 52.2% Collinsville Fire District $201,461 $283,018 $292,033 $302,451 50.1% Jenks School District $38,118,409 $52,664,916 $55,375,506 $56,473,139 48.2% Keystone School District $354,136 $422,247 $507,545 $523,220 47.7% Ow asso School District $15,597,513 $22,031,943 $22,748,154 $22,679,800 45.4% Tulsa School District $116,445,533 $151,316,782 $157,456,892 $163,356,346 40.3% Sperry School District $577,454 $752,134 $797,214 $801,008 38.7% County of Tulsa $41,948,179 $53,409,535 $55,938,483 $57,586,835 37.3% Health Department $10,475,065 $13,338,539 $13,983,011 $14,373,576 37.2% City County Library $21,598,488 $27,504,274 $28,833,186 $29,627,474 37.2% Tulsa Technology Center $54,118,022 $68,915,784 $72,245,558 $74,235,757 37.2% Tulsa Community College $29,276,056 $37,275,529 $39,076,555 $40,153,024 37.2% Countyw ide School 4-Mill $16,486,345 $20,659,782 $21,605,709 $22,203,924 34.7% Union School District $42,868,362 $51,869,915 $54,250,112 $56,316,867 31.4% Sand Springs School District $8,636,911 $10,661,391 $10,846,413 $11,076,077 28.2% City of Sand Springs $1,460,475 $1,991,508 $1,597,622 $1,632,914 11.8% City of Ow asso $0 $139,198 $121,760 $89,547 N/A City of Collinsville $0 $0 $0 $0 N/A County Wide Common Schools $4,673,965 $4,269,469 $4,319,059 $4,624,517-1.1% City of Glenpool $193,211 $5 $3 $84-100.0% Drainage District 13 -- Jenks $182,132 $0 $0 $0-100.0% Leonard School District $158,585 $0 $0 $0-100.0% Sew er District 6 $5,553 $0 $0 $0-100.0% Total: Ad Valorem $ 499,422,649 $ 681,198,841 $712,622,449 $732,699,666 46.7% Total: Others (Fire, Drainage, and Sew er) $1,026,614 $2,228,857 $2,355,478 $1,874,179 82.6% Grand Total $ 500,449,263 $ 683,427,698 $ 714,977,927 $ 734,573,845 46.8% Revised 7-12-17 11 of 17

Property Taxation 102 Property Tax Rates by School Districts Source: County Fiscal Office and Oklahoma Tax Commission 12 of 17 Revised 1-25-18

Property Taxation 102 Property Tax Rates by Cities Source: County Fiscal Office and Oklahoma Tax Commission 13 of 17 Revised 1-25-18

Oklahoma Property Taxes by County Source: Oklahoma Tax Commission Revised 1-25-18 14 of 17

Regional Taxes Source: D.C. Nationwide Comparison Report and Oklahoma and other State Tax Commissions Revised 1-25-18 15 of 17

Property Tax Collections Per Capita Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Tax Foundation FY 2014 Data D.C. $3,139 Montana $1,465 Arizona $986 New Jersey $3,065 U.S. Total $1,462 Hawaii $980 New Hampshire $2,861 Virginia $1,457 Indiana $970 Connecticut $2,774 Alaska $2,639 New York $2,581 * Kansas $1,435 Minnesota $1,411 Pennsylvania $1,405 * Utah $969 Missouri $960 Nevada $953 Vermont $2,339 California $1,385 North Carolina $951 Rhode Island $2,307 Massachusetts $2,181 * Colorado $1,365 Washington $1,364 Idaho $928 Mississippi $916 Wyoming $2,109 Oregon $1,350 West Virginia $852 Illinois $2,007 Michigan $1,335 Louisiana $839 Maine $1,918 South Dakota $1,301 Tennessee $830 Nebraska $1,757 Ohio $1,203 Delaware $828 * Wisconsin $1,657 Texas $1,635 Iowa $1,525 Jenks $1,503 Maryland $1,491 Revised 6-21-17 Florida $1,184 North Dakota $1,121 Georgia $1,087 Tulsa County $1,084 South Carolina $1,080 Kentucky $737 New Mexico $731 Arkansas $675 Oklahoma $623 Alabama $522 16 of 17 * Surrounding States * *

Median Property Taxes Paid on Homes Source: Tax Foundation 2006-2010 Average Ranking Nationwide Highest Taxes Ranking Oklahoma Highest Taxes Ranking New York Westchester County $9,003 1 Oklahoma Tulsa County $1,344 972 New York Nassau County $8,711 2 Oklahoma Cleveland County $1,281 1044 New Jersey Hunterdon County $8,523 3 Oklahoma Canadian County $1,232 1128 New Jersey Bergen County $8,489 4 Oklahoma Oklahoma County $1,132 1275 New York Rockland County $8,268 5 Oklahoma Wagoner County $1,087 1354 New Jersey Essex County $8,117 6 Oklahoma Rogers County $1,030 1441 Nationwide Lowest Taxes Ranking Oklahoma Lowest Taxes Ranking Louisiana Vermilion Parish $214 2768 Oklahoma Harper County $289 2732 Alabama Coosa County $212 2769 Oklahoma Kiowa County $285 2736 Alabama Clay County $210 2770 Oklahoma Alfalfa County $284 2737 Alabama Crenshaw County $206 2771 Oklahoma Pushmataha County $272 2745 Louisiana St. Landry Parish $202 2772 Oklahoma Latimer County $266 2749 Louisiana Union Parish $202 2772 Oklahoma Cimarron County $244 2757 Regional Highest Taxes by State Ranking Texas Collin County $4,351 48 Kansas Johnson County $2,664 236 Colorado Douglas County $2,590 253 Missouri St. Charles County $2,377 306 New Mexico Bernalillo County $1,530 750 Oklahoma Tulsa County $1,344 972 Revised 1-23-15 17 of 17