Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Similar documents
Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 1

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation Unified Staff Report for Small Scale Plan Amendment and Rezoning

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

B. The Plan is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan.

CITY OF TARPON SPRINGS Staff Report May 16, 2017

2. Rezone a portion of the lot from R2 (Small Lot Residential) to RD2 (Duplex: Housing Lane).

3. What is the requested zoning for the property (including intensity designator)? RM1-45 Residential (Multi-Dwelling).

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011

Mohave County General Plan

CITY OF ALBERT LEA PLANNING COMMISSION ADVISORY BOARD

Urban Planning and Land Use

Planning Commission Application Summary

Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation REZONING

Marcel Williams, MPC Project Planner

Proposed Overland Park Kansas Ordinance RE-1 Residential Estates Community

May 12, Chapter RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections:

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Town of Waxhaw Board of Commissioners. Waxhaw Police Department Community Meeting Room Tuesday January 12, 2016

ARTICLE IV DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Planning Commission Application Summary

Memphis City Council Summary Sheet. S.D Roland Road Street Right-of-Way Dedication

ACTION FORM BRYAN CITY COUNCIL

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. Staff Report. Site Plan Review. SP June 19, 2018

Marion County Board of County Commissioners

TOOELE COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE CHAPTER 31 Page 1

CITY OF BELLEVIEW PLANNING & ZONING BOARD AGENDA

THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

COUNTY OF LINCOLN, NORTH CAROLINA

GENERAL PROVISIONS, DISTRICTS, AND DISTRICT MAPS

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

Metropolitan Planning Commission. DATE: April 5, 2016

DATE: February 28, Marilynn Lewis, Principal Planner

MPC STAFF REPORT REZONING MAP AMENDMENT ALDERMANIC DISTRICT 1 COUNTY COMMISSION DISTRICT 5 April 3, 2013 MPC FILE NUMBER.

STAFF REPORT City of Ormond Beach Department of Planning

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

Planning Commission Application Summary

Report to the Plan Commission February 4, 2013

Public Notice. June 7, Application: New Zoning Schedule: RD3 (Residential Infill)

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BRYAN, TEXAS:

Request Subdivision Variance (Section 4.4(c)(1) of the Subdivision Regulations) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jonathan Sanders

RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

PLAN COMMISSION Wednesday, August 30, 2017

CITY OF DURHAM DURHAM COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA. Zoning Map Change Report. RR Existing Zoning. Rural Rural Density Residential Site Characteristics

The Planning Commission. DATE: July 19, 2016

M E M O R A N D U M. Planning and Zoning Commission. Daniel Turner, Planner I

Request Subdivision Variance (to Section 4.4 (b) of the Subdivision Regulations) Staff Planner Kevin Kemp

Land Use, Transportation, and Infrastructure Committee of the Denver City Council FROM: Scott Robinson, Senior City Planner DATE: March 22, 2018 RE:

ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT

STAFF REPORT. Community Development Director PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report. 956 W. Chatham Street. Town Council Meeting January 9, 2014

Land Use, Transportation, and Infrastructure Committee of Denver City Council FROM: Scott Robinson, Senior City Planner DATE: December 6, 2018 RE:

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda Public Hearing Item

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

Chapter MIXED USE ZONING DISTRICTS

31, Township 29 South, Range 25 East, Polk County, Florida, as depicted by the Land Use Plan attached

Town of Jamestown Planning Board Zoning Staff Report June 14, 2010

Planning Commission Hearing Date: 2/21/2017 Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date: 3/8/2017

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-20 Habitat for Humanity Evans Road Town Council Meeting October 16, 2014

ARTICLE Encourage well planned, efficient development.

PLNSUB Meridian Commerce Center Subdivision Amendment & PLNPCM Meridian Commerce Center Street Closure

Attachment 5 - Ordinance 3154 Exhibit D (Revised for 9/15 Council Meeting) Page 1 of 7 Port Townsend Municipal Code. Chapter 17.18

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-24 Indian Wells Road Properties Town Council Meeting November 20, 2014

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

FINAL DRAFT 12/1/16, Rev. to 7/18/17

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia

NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH... JANUARY 23, 2018

CITY OF RAYTOWN Request for Board Action

TO: Glynn County Islands Planning Commission. Eric Landon, Planner II. PP2754 Stones Throw Cottages. DATE: February 6, 2014

SECTION 3.1 ZONING DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 13-REZ-13 An Zou Property Town Council Meeting November 21, 2013

Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Date: December 3, 2012

Marion County Planning & Zoning Commission

The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District:

MISSOULA COUNTY ZONING REGULATIONS Effective April 11, Chapter 2 Zoning Districts

RM18 RS9 RM12 RS9 !( S DOCKET #: W3120 PROPOSED ZONING: GB-L EXISTING ZONING: HB-S. PETITIONER: Bank of North Carolina for property owned by Same

Staff Report Zoning Amendment Case Number R #1/18

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

Comprehensive Plan Amendment #PLN , Reserve at Cannon Branch (Coles Magisterial District)

Transcription:

City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2017-0451 Legistar File ID 9/5/2017 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non-Agenda Item Andrew Garner Submitted By 8/18/2017 Submitted Date Action Recommendation: City Planning / Development Services Department Division / Department RZN 17-5862: Rezone (41 E. NORTH ST./ANDONA PROPERTIES, 445): Submitted by ANDREA FOURNET for property at 41 E. NORTH ST. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE, and R-O, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE and contains approximately 0.84 acres. The request is to rezone a portion of the property to NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION. Budget Impact: Account Number Fund Project Number Project Title Budgeted Item? NA Current Budget $ - Funds Obligated $ - Current Balance $ - Does item have a cost? No Item Cost Budget Adjustment Attached? NA Budget Adjustment Remaining Budget $ - Must Attach Completed Budget Adjustment! Previous Ordinance or Resolution # V20140710 Original Contract Number: Approval Date: Comments:

MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 5, 2017 TO: THRU: FROM: Mayor, Fayetteville City Council Andrew Garner, Planning Director Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner DATE: August 18, 2017 SUBJECT: RZN 17-5862: Rezone (41 E. NORTH ST./ANDONA PROPERTIES, 445): Submitted by ANDREA FOURNET for property at 41 E. NORTH ST. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE, and R-O, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE and contains approximately 0.84 acres. The request is to rezone a portion of the property to NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION. RECOMMENDATION: The City Planning staff and recommend approval of an ordinance to rezone the subject property to NC, Neighborhood Conservation, as shown in the attached Exhibits A and B. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located at the intersection of North Street and Pollard Avenue west of North College Avenue, and contains approximately 0.84 acres. The property is zoned R-O, Residential Office and contains an existing 2,553 square foot home, constructed in 1942. In December of 2016 the City Council approved an ordinance that vacated an un-built right-of-way that had existed on the property since the area s platting. Request: The request is to rezone the property from R-O, Residential Office to NC, Neighborhood Conservation. The applicant stated that the intent is facilitate development of the site. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed zoning is compatible with surrounding land use patterns in this area, which consists of single-family residential properties west of Pollard Avenue, and commercial uses generally to the east of Pollard. The property is located at a well-defined boundary between typical residential neighborhood and more intense commercial uses and high volume traffic corridors. The NC zoning district allows only single-family residences by right, which is more restrictive and allows less intense development patterns than is currently allowed. Further, the residential lots in this area display a very regular pattern of 60-foot wide lots containing approximately 10,000 square. The NC zoning district allows a slightly narrower residential lot, at 40 wide, which would result in very similar and compatible lots sizes at this location. Land Use Plan Analysis: The proposed zoning is compatible with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and consistent with the City Neighborhood Area designation of the subject property,

which encourages a wide variety of residential types within a traditional neighborhood pattern. City Plan 2030 encourages both infill development and re-development in a traditional urban form, which is satisfied by proposed zoning, where the existing R-O zoning district requires the large setbacks typical of a suburban development pattern. DISCUSSION: On, the forwarded the proposal to City Council with a recommendation for approval passed by a vote of 9-0-0. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: N/A Attachments: Exhibit A Exhibit B Application Staff Report 2

RZN 17-5862 Close Up View ANDONA PROPERTIES 17-5862 EXHIBIT 'A' OAKWOOD ST P-1 COLLEGE AVE C-2 WASHINGTON AVE NORTH ST Subject Property UT PIKE ST R-O PARK AVE ALLEY 48 POLLARD AVE C-1 BAXTER LN RSF-4 HIGHLAND AVE CLEBURN ST DG N Legend Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Building Footprint Feet 0 75 150 300 450 600 1 inch = 200 RSF-4 Residential-Office C-1 C-2 Urban Thoroughfare Downtown General P-1

17-5862 EXHIBIT 'B'

TO: THRU: FROM: City of Fayetteville Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Quin Thompson, Planner MEETING DATE: July 26, 2017 SUBJECT: RZN 17-5862: Rezone (41 E. NORTH ST./ANDONA PROPERTIES, 445): Submitted by ANDREA FOURNET for property at 41 E. NORTH ST. The property is zoned R-O, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE and contains approximately 0.84 acres. The request is to rezone a portion of the property to NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding RZN 17-5862 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval, based on the findings herein. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located at the intersection of North Street and Pollard Avenue west of North College Avenue, and contains approximately 0.84 acres. The property is zoned R-O, Residential Office and contains an existing 2,553 square foot home, constructed in 1942. The surrounding land use and zoning is depicted on Table 1. Table 1 Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Direction Land Use Zoning North UAMS P-1, Institutional South Single-family Residential RSF-4, Residential Single-family / 4 units per acre East Office UT, Urban Thoroughfare West Parking Lot RSF-4, Residential Single-family / 4 units per acre Request: The request is to rezone the property from R-O, Residential Office to NC, Neighborhood Conservation. The applicant stated that the intent is facilitate development of the site. Public Comment: No public comment as of writing this report. INFRASTRUCTURE: Streets: The subject parcel has access to Pollard Avenue, an unimproved, asphalt local street. Any street improvements required in these areas would be determined at the time of development proposal. Page 1 of 14

Water: Sewer: Drainage: Fire: Police: Public water is available to the site. There is an existing 6-inch main along the southern side of the property in an easement (vacated right-of-way). This line is available for service connections Sanitary Sewer is available to the site. There is a 12-inch sewer main that runs along the western side of this parcel, just offsite in a utility easement. This line is available for service connections. Any additional improvements or requirements for drainage will be determined at time of development. No portion of this property is identified as FEMA regulated floodplain. No protected streams are located onsite, nor is any of this parcel in the HHOD. Some areas onsite are however identified as having 15% or greater slopes and may be subject to residential grading permits if applicable. The Fire Department did not comment on this request. The Police Department did not comment on this request. CITY PLAN 2030 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN: City Plan 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates the properties within the proposed rezone as City Neighborhood Area. These areas are more densely developed than residential neighborhood areas and provide a varying mix of nonresidential and residential uses. This designation supports the widest spectrum of uses and encourages density in all housing types. Non-residential uses range in size, variety and intensity from grocery stores and offices to churches, and are typically located at corners and along connecting corridors. FINDINGS OF THE STAFF 1. A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: Land Use Compatibility: The proposed zoning is compatible with surrounding land use patterns in this area, which consists of single-family residential properties west of Pollard Avenue, and commercial uses generally to the east of Pollard. The property is located at a well-defined boundary between typical residential neighborhood and more intense commercial uses and high volume traffic corridors. The NC zoning district allows only single-family residences by right, which is more restrictive and allows less intense development patterns than is currently allowed. Further, the residential lots in this area display a very regular pattern of 60-foot wide lots containing approximately 10,000 square. The NC zoning district allows a slightly narrower residential lot, at 40 wide, which would result in very similar and compatible lots sizes at this location. Land Use Plan Analysis: The proposed zoning is compatible with the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and consistent with the City Neighborhood Area designation of the subject property, which encourages a wide variety of residential types within a traditional neighborhood pattern. City Plan 2030 encourages both infill development and re-development in a traditional urban form, which is satisfied by proposed zoning, where the existing R-O zoning district requires the large setbacks typical of a suburban development pattern. G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2017\Development Review\17-5862 RZN 41 E. North St. (Andona Properties) 445\01 \07-24-2017\Comments & Redlines Page 2 of 14

2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: The applicant has requested the NC zoning district to allow for reduced lot widths which would allow for future residential development. 3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: The proposed zone is expected to be a decrease in potential traffic danger or congestion in the area over the current R-O zoning. 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities. Finding: The proposed zoning would result in significantly less potential impacts to public services than the current R-O zoning. The R-O zoning allows a density of 24 units per acre along with office and limited business uses by right. The NC zoning allows a density of 10 units per acre and only single-family dwellings by right. The Police and Fire Departments have not commented on the proposed zoning. 5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted under its existing zoning classifications; b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding RZN 17-5862 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval, based on the findings discussed throughout this report. G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2017\Development Review\17-5862 RZN 41 E. North St. (Andona Properties) 445\01 \07-24-2017\Comments & Redlines Page 3 of 14

Action: Approved Tabled Denied Meeting Date: July 26, 2017 Motion: Second: Vote: BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: None Attachments: UDC 161.20 - R-O, Residential Office UDC 161.29 NC, Neighborhood Conservation Request letter Property exhibit One Mile Map Close-Up Map Current Land Use Map Future Land Use Map G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2017\Development Review\17-5862 RZN 41 E. North St. (Andona Properties) 445\01 \07-24-2017\Comments & Redlines Page 4 of 14

161.20 - District R-O, Residential Officemodified (A) Purpose. The Residential-Office District is designed primarily to provide area for offices without limitation to the nature or size of the office, together with community facilities, restaurants and compatible residential uses. (B) Uses. (1) Permitted uses. Unit 1 Unit 5 Unit 8 Unit 9 Unit 12a Unit 25 Unit 41 Unit 44 Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 11 Unit 13 Unit 15 Unit 24 Unit 26 Unit 36 Unit 42 Unit 45 City-wide uses by right Government facilities Single-family dwellings Two-family dwellings Limited business Offices, studios, and related services Accessory dwellings Cluster Housing Development (2) Conditional Uses. (C) Density. Units per acre City-wide uses by conditional use permit Public protection and utility facilities Cultural and recreational facilities Manufactured home park* Eating places Neighborhood shopping goods Home occupations Multi-family dwellings Wireless communications facilities* Clean technologies Small scale production 24 or less (D) Bulk and Area Regulations. (Per dwelling unit for residential structures) (1) Lot Width Minimum. Manufactured home park 100 Lot within a manufactured home park 50 Single-family 60 Two (2) family 60 Three (3) or more 90 (2) Lot Area Minimum. Manufactured home park Lot within a manufactured home park Townhouses: Development Individual lot Single-family Two (2) family Three (3) or more Fraternity or Sorority (3) Land Area Per Dwelling Unit. Manufactured home Townhouses & apartments: No bedroom One bedroom Two (2) or more bedrooms Fraternity or Sorority (E) Setback Regulations. Front 3 acres 4,200 square 10,000 square 2,500 square 6,000 square 6,500 square 8,000 square 1 acre 3,000 square 1,000 square 1,000 square 1,200 square 500 square per resident Front, if parking is allowed between the right-of-way and the building Front, in the Hillside Overlay District Side Side, when contiguous to a residential district Side, in the Hillside Overlay District Rear, without easement or alley Rear, from center line of public alley Rear, in the Hillside Overlay District 15 50 15 10 15 8 25 10 15 G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2017\Development Review\17-5862 RZN 41 E. North St. (Andona Properties) 445\01 \07-24-2017\Comments & Redlines Page 5 of 14

(F) Building Height Regulations. Building Height Maximum 60 Height Regulations. Any building which exceeds the height of 20 shall be set back from any side boundary line of an adjacent single family district an additional distance of 1 foot for each foot of height in excess of 20. (G) Building Area. On any lot, the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 60% of the total area of such lot. (Code No. 1965, App. A., Art. 5(x); Ord. No. 2414, 2-7-78; Ord. No. 2603, 2-19-80; Ord. No. 2621, 4-1-80; Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-70; Code 1991, 160.041; Ord. No. 4100, 2 (Ex. A), 6-16- 98; Ord. No. 4178, 8-31-99; Ord. No. 4726, 7-19- 05; Ord. No. 4943, 11-07-06; Ord. No. 5079, 11-20-07; Ord. No. 5195, 11-6-08; Ord. No. 5224, 3-3-09; Ord. No. 5312, 4-20-10; Ord. No. 5462, 12-6-11; Ord. No. 5735 1-20-15; Ord. No. 5800, 1(Exh. A), 10-6-15; Ord. No. 5921, 1, 11-1-16; Ord. No. 5945, 5, 7 9, 1-17-17) 161.27 - Neighborhood Conservation (A) (B) Purpose. The Neighborhood Conservation zone has the least activity and a lower density than the other zones. Although Neighborhood Conservation is the most purely residential zone, it can have some mix of uses, such as civic buildings. Neighborhood Conservation serves to promote and protect neighborhood character. For the purposes of Chapter 96: Noise Control, the Neighborhood Conservation district is a residential zone. Uses. (1) Permitted Uses. Unit 1 Unit 8 Unit 41 City-wide uses by right Single-family dwellings Accessory dwellings (2) Conditional Uses. Unit 2 Unit 3 Unit 4 Unit 9 Unit 10 Unit 12 Unit 24 Unit 25 Unit 28 Unit 36 Unit 44 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Public protection and utility facilities Cultural and recreational facilities Two (2) family dwellings Three (3) family dwellings Limited business* Home occupations Offices, studios, and related services Center for collecting recyclable materials Wireless communication facilities Cottage Housing Development (C) Density. Ten (10) Units Per Acre. (D) Bulk and Area Regulations. (1) Lot Width Minimum. G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2017\Development Review\17-5862 RZN 41 E. North St. (Andona Properties) 445\01 \07-24-2017\Comments & Redlines Page 6 of 14

Single Family Two Family Three Family 40 80 90 (2) Lot Area Minimum. 4,000 square (E) Setback Regulations. Front Side Rear Rear, from center line of an alley A build-to zone that is located between the front property line and a line 25 from the front property line. 5 5 12 (F) Building Height Regulations. Building Height Maximum 45 (Ord. No. 5128, 4-15-08; Ord. No. 5312, 4-20-10; Ord. No. 5462, 12-6-11; Ord. No. 5592, 6-18-13; Ord. No. 5664, 2-18-14; Ord. No. 5800, 1(Exh. A), 10-6-15) G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2017\Development Review\17-5862 RZN 41 E. North St. (Andona Properties) 445\01 \07-24-2017\Comments & Redlines Page 7 of 14

G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2017\Development Review\17-5862 RZN 41 E. North St. (Andona Properties) 445\01 \07-24-2017\Comments & Redlines Page 8 of 14

June 13, 2017 City of Fayetteville 113 West Mountain St Fayetteville, AR 72701 Subject: Rezoning of 41 E. North Street on southwest corner of North and Pollard. The property is zoned RO and contains approximately one acre. Request is for rezoning of part the lot to NC-Neighborhood Conservation (Tract B - 80 x180.05 ) Legal description and survey attached. A. Andona Properties, LLC own the property located at the corner of North St and Pollard. We purchased the property in 2009, spent thousands of dollars to refurbish the old deteriorating house and overgrown yard. Currently, it is rented as a single family residence and at the end of 2016 the city vacated the roadway easement of Pike street. B. We have been consulting with engineers and the City Planning office about the highest and best use for this property. It is our conclusion that NC zoning for this tract would allow it to be developed with a mixture of residential and commercial uses in a traditional urban form. C. With its location, across the street from the ever growing UAMS and VA campuses and the newly rezoned to Urban Thoroughfare property on the corner of College and Pollard, we believe a rezoning to NC would be in line with the primary goal of City Plan 2030 infill development. We believe there will be little impact on traffic. By developing this property the opportunity to walk to work increases. Page 9 of 14

D. Water and Sewer: Public water is available to the property. There is an 8 and 10 main adjacent to the property. Sanitary sewer is available to the site. There is a 12 and 6 public main adjacent to the property. E. This change of zoning would be consistent with land use planning objectives. See C. F. This is approximately an acre of land that has had development grow up around it. Because of the neighborhood changes we feel the NC zoning for Tract B is the highest and best use and is in line with the primary goal of City Plan 2030 infill development. G. No appreciable increase in traffic, danger, or congestion. H. No this rezone will not alter the population density undesirably thereby not increasing the load on public services. I. Current RO zoning will remain of the house and front lot Tract A. This rezone is for the vacant land behind to the south of the house allowing infill to this area Tract B. Respectfully submitted, Andrea Fournet Ramona Jones Page 10 of 14

Page 11 of 14

RZN 17-5862 One Mile View ANDONA PROPERTIES N I-1 CS FRISCO AVE DAWN DR MOLLY CT MOA N RMF-24 GREGG AVE PL RMF-40 SPRUCE ST FOREST HTS LAWSON ST HOLLY ST SHADY LN ADAMS ST HAWTHORN ST PROSPECT ST WOOLSEY AVE SYCAMORE ST 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Miles C LEBURN ST PARK AVE ALLEY 48 HIGHLAND AVE POLLARD AVE ABSHIER DR CLEBURN ST NATURAL WAY C-2 P-1 Subject Property PROSPECT ST R-O HILLCREST AVE OAKWOOD ST BAXTER LN NORTH ST FR IT Z DR PROSPECT ST LAKE RIDGE DR LAKEFRONT DR RUSH DR RSF-4 MISSION BLVD EDGEHILL DR KNOX DR GREGG AVE WILSON AVE WEST AVE VANDEVENTER AVE DG LOUISE ST ILA ST NC MOCK AVE TRENTON BLVD FOREST AVE HIGHLAND AVE ALLEY 13 COLLEGE AVE DAVIDSON ST MSC MAPLE ST LAFAYETTE ST REBECCA ST WILLOW AVE WALNUT AVE ALLEY 456 OLIVE AVE ALLEY 534 FALLIN AVE RMF-6 Legend Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Shared Use Paved Trail Trail (Proposed) Building Footprint Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Zoning RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY Residential-Agricultural RSF-.5 RSF-1 RSF-2 RSF-4 RSF-7 RSF-8 RSF-18 RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY RT-12 Residential Two and Three-family RMF-6 RMF-12 RMF-18 EXTRACTION RMF-24 PLANNED ZONING DISTRICTS RMF-40 Commercial, Industrial, Residential INDUSTRIAL INSTITUTIONAL I-1 Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial P-1 I-2 General Industrial E-1 COMMERCIAL Residential-Office C-1 C-2 C-3 FORM BASED DISTRICTS Downtown Core Urban Thoroughfare Main Street Center Downtown General Community Services Neighborhood Services Neighborhood Conservation Page 12 of 14

RZN 17-5862 Close Up View ANDONA PROPERTIES OAKWOOD ST P-1 COLLEGE AVE C-2 WASHINGTON AVE NORTH ST Subject Property UT PIKE ST R-O PARK AVE ALLEY 48 POLLARD AVE C-1 BAXTER LN RSF-4 HIGHLAND AVE CLEBURN ST DG N Legend Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Building Footprint Feet 0 75 150 300 450 600 1 inch = 200 RSF-4 Residential-Office C-1 C-2 Urban Thoroughfare Downtown General P-1 Page 13 of 14

RZN 17-5862 Current Land Use ANDONA PROPERTIES N OAKWOOD ST VA Hospital COLLEGE AVE WASHINGTON AVE NORTH ST PARK AVE Subject Property PIKE ST CLEBURN ST ALLEY 48 HIGHLAND AVE Single Family POLLARD AVE Commercial BAXTER LN CLEBURN ST RZN17-5862 2017 Imagery - Kucera Street RGB Downtown Master Plan Red: Band_1 MSP Class Green: Band_2 MAIN STREET 63 Blue: Band_3 PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 2017 Imagery - Pictometry County Parcels RGB Planning Area Red: Band_1 Fayetteville City Limits Green: Band_2 Blue: Band_3 Feet 0 75 150 300 450 600 1 inch = 200 Page 14 of 14