BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: March 18, 2014 AGENDA ITEM NO. c;2f. Consent Agenda D Regular Agenda Public Hearing 0. Administrator's Si

Similar documents
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: October 8, 2013 AGENDA ITEM NO. 20v-C,

COMMISSION AGENDA: # /0

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: October 8, 2013 AGENDA ITEM NO. 20v-C,

City of Sunny Isles Beach Collins Avenue Sunny Isles Beach, Florida 33160

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

ORDINANCE NUMBER 2015-

ORDINANCE NO. O-5-10

Planning Commission Report

ALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: February 12, 2013 AGENDA ITEM NO.._3

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED THE CHAIRMAN SIGN THE AGREEMENT AND THE CLERK ATTEST.

ORDINANCE NO. 15- Regulations (LDR) which would further the codification of TOD regulations that

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: December 16, 2014 AGENDA ITEM NO. 35. Public Hearing [t(" Consent Agenda D Regular Agenda D

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

Gulf Boulevard, Indian Rocks Beach

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

SECTION I AMENDMENT REPORT BROWARD COUNTY LAND USE PLAN TEXT PROPOSED AMENDMENT PCT BrowardNext Corrective Amendments RECOMMENDATIONS/ACTIONS

MEMORANDUM. Douglas Hutchens, Interim City Manag~ August 4, 2016 / Greg Rice, Director of Planning & Development

Item 10C 1 of 69

ORDINANCE NO. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SARASOTA COUNTY, FLORIDA:

i? Subiect: DATE: April 21,2009,., AGENDA ITEM NO. Consent Agenda [7 Regular Agenda Public Hearing Countv Administrator's Siqnature

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

ORDINANCE NO

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

Ordinance No. 04 Series of 2013 RECITALS

ORDINANCE City of DeBary Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 3

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (Ordinance No.: 3036, 12/3/07; Repealed & Replaced by Ordinance No.: 4166, 10/15/12)

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Express Short-Term Rental Prohibition. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director and the City Attorney s Office

LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE

Chair to close public hearing. Review Deadline: 60 Days: 8/18/ Days: 10/17/2017

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

TOWN OF PALM BEACH Information for Town Council Meeting on: July 12, 2017

Village of Glenview Zoning Board of Appeals

direct that agriculture is the primary land use in the County, minimize conflicts arising from

DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

Mountain Village seeks to amend Community Development Code to better align with Comprehensive Plan

Multi-family dwellings (including assisted living facilities), Public buildings, facility or land; and,

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES DOCUMENT: BrowardNEXT

City Commission Agenda Cover Memorandum

ORDINANCE NO

PUBLIC HEARING Agenda Item No.: 9a CC Mtg.: 05/24/2011

"ARTICLE - VINE STREET TRANSITIONAL (VST) DISTRICT

Barton Brierley, AICP, Community Development Director (Staff Contact: Barton Brierley, (707) )

CITY OF LOS ALTOS CITY COUNCIL MEETING June 9, 2015

ORDINANCE NO. _ _

Bunker Hill Part II Urban Design. Specific Plan. Case No. CPC SP TABLE OF CONTENTS

Village of Glenview Zoning Board of Appeals

PENINSULA TOWNSHIP DONATION of DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS ORDINANCE (DDR, No. 45)

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

Director, Community Planning, South District

TOWNSHIP OF MANALAPAN ORDINANCE NO

STAFF REPORT. September 25, City Council. Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

SUBJECT: Character Area Studies and Site Plan Approval for Low Density Residential Areas. Community and Corporate Services Committee

TOWNSHIP OF EAST HEMPFIELD. Lancaster County, Pennsylvania ORDINANCE NO.

Amendment to the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances; Consider Repeal Cluster Development Standards

And adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pleasanton on May 2, 2017 by the following vote:

The Countywide Rules. Amended through May 31, 2016

1 ORDINANCE 4, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER TAXATION.

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO provides that historic preservation ad valorem tax exemptions may be granted only by ordinance of the county; and

ARTICLE 4: SCHEDULE OF DISTRICT, USE AND SETBACK REGULATIONS

Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance

May 12, Chapter RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections:

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

ORDINANCE NO

ORDINANCE NO

November 21, The City Council reviewed and discussed a report setting forth the existing regulations pertaining to vacation rentals.

R E S O L U T I O N. Residential 384,918 sq. ft. To be demolished Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 0 0.7

Village of Palm Springs

RESIDENTIAL VACATION RENTALS

BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JANET REESE, PLANNER II

ORDINANCE NO WHEREAS amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan and. 10 WHEREAS, for year 2015, the City is required to conduct a "Periodic

DATE: September 18, 2014 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Douglas Spondello, Associate Planner

ORDINANCE NO to amend subsection A to add subsection (15) which shall read as follows: (15) Attached dwelling units such as townhouses.

Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-

Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR February 24, 2014 Page 2 of 7 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENTS

CITY OF LABELLE ORDINANCE BROWARD AVE LLC PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONE

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. DISCUSSION ON ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADUs)

CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU BILL , CDI

Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Planning Commission. DATE: September 28, 2015 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

ATTACHMENT 4 ORDINANCE NO.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

DIVISION 7. R-6 AND R-6A RESIDENTIAL ZONES* The purpose of the R-6 residential zone is:

In order to permit maximum applicability of the PUD District, PUD-1 and PUD-2 Districts are hereby created.

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. Regular Agenda I RECOMMEND THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (BOARD) APPROVE THE ZONING REQUEST.

ORDINANCE NO. WHEREAS, many Vacation Rentals are currently operating throughout Mendocino County; and

Presentation. Agenda Item # 1. Meeting Date February 3, Erkin Ozberk, Planner. Prepared By. Brian T. Kenner City Manager.

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: January 6, 2016

DRAFT- FOR REVIEW BY COUNCIL ON 1/8/19 ORDINANCE NO. XXXX

City of Chicago. Office of the City Clerk Document Tracking Sheet 6/25/2014

TOWNSHIP OF UPPER MACUNGIE LEHIGH COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. ORDINANCE NO [To be considered for Adoption June 1, 2017]

WHEREAS, the extreme shortage of housing in the City of Los Angeles has been well documented;

COUNCIL BILL NO ORDINANCE NO. 3594

Transcription:

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DATE: March 18, 2014 AGENDA ITEM NO. c;2f Consent Agenda D Regular Agenda Public Hearing 0 Coun Administrator's Si Subject: Proposed Minor Plan Change to Beach By Design Special Area Plan Department: Planning and Development Services Staff Member Responsible: Larry Arrington, Executive Director Recommended Action: IT IS RECOMMENDED THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (BOARD}, SITTING AS THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY (CPA}, RECEIVE AND ACCEPT THE REQUESTED MINOR CHANGES TO THE BEACH BY DESIGN SPECIAL AREA PLAN. Summary Explanation/Background: The Board has received a recommendation from the Pinellas Planning Council (PPC or Council) concerning proposed minor changes to the Beach By Design Special Area Plan (Case CW 01-25 (SAP Change No. 8-2014)). The Board approved the Beach by Design Special Area Plan in June 2001 in support of the City of Clearwater's initiative for guiding redevelopment on Clearwater Beach. Since then, the City has submitted seven revisions to Beach by Design for action by the CPA. The City of Clearwater has submitted a proposal to amend the Beach by Design Special Area Plan relating to setbacks, stepbacks, and operational characteristics for hotels that receive room allocations from the Hotel Density Reserve. County staff agrees with the PPC finding that the proposed changes to Beach by Design are not substantive and concurs with the PPC recommendation that the CPA receive and accept for filing the minor changes. Fiscal Impact/Cost/Revenue Summary: N/A Exhibits/Attachments Attached: Council Documentation Revised 03-2012

TO: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the Board of County Commissioners, in Your Capacity as the Countywide Planning Authority THROUGH: Robert S. LaSala, County Administrator FROM: Michael C. Crawford, Interim Executive~ Pinellas Planning Council SUBJECT: March 18, 2014 Countywide Planning Authority Agenda Part III- Regular Agenda Re: Minor Plan Change- CW 01-25 (SAP Change No. 8-2014) Beach by Design - City of Clearwater DATE: March 18, 2014 RECOMMENDATION: THE PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL RECOMMENDS THE BOARD, IN YOUR CAP A CITY AS THE COUNTYWIDE PLANNING AUTHORITY, RECEIVE AND ACCEPT THE CITY OF CLEARWATER BEACH BY DESIGN- MINOR PLAN CHANGE - CW 01-25 (SAP CHANGE NO. 8-2014), AS OUTLINED BELOW. DISCUSSION: The City of Clearwater proposes to amend the Beach By Design Special Area Plan (SAP) regarding building setbacks, step backs, and hotel operational characteristics. Ordinance No. 8497-14 from the City outlines the proposed revisions to the SAP which were approved and adopted by the City Council on December 19, 2013 (first reading). The Council has reviewed the proposed revisions and concluded they are not substantive relative to the Countywide Rules and the CRD plan category; therefore it is recommended this requested be received and accepted pursuant to the requirements of Section 4.2.7.6.3 of the Countywide Rules. The Pinellas Planning Council, by a vote of 8-0, received and accepted the proposed Minor Change to the City of Clearwater Beach By Design Special Area Plan and authorized transmittal to the Countywide Planning Authority for Receipt and Acceptance.

Case CW 01-25 (SAP Change No. 8-2014) Minor Plan Change to the Beach By Design Special Area Plan City of Clearwater

PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL AGENDA MEMORANDUM I AGENDA ITEM: IV A. [MEETING DATE: February 12,2014 I SUBJECT: CASE#: JURISDICTION: LOCATION: TYPE: Proposed Minor Plan Change to the Beach By Design Special Area Plan CW 01-25 (SAP Change No. 8-2014) Clearwater See Attached Map Minor Special Area Plan Change RECOMMENDATION: Council, Based On Accompanying Findings, Receive And Accept The Proposed Minor Change To The Beach By Design Special Area Plan And Transmit This Item To The Countywide Planning Authority For Receipt And Acceptance. I. BACKGROUND The City of Clearwater proposes to amend the Beach By Design Special Area Plan (SAP) regarding building setbacks, stepbacks, and hotel operational characteristics. The attached ordinance (refer to Attachment I, Ordinance No. 8497-14) from the City outlines the proposed revisions to the SAP which were approved and adopted by the City Council on December 19, 2013 (first reading). Beach By Design does not establish minimum side and rear setbacks. The amendments establish a minimum 1 0-foot side building setback for development in the Small Motel District. This district is located between Hamden and Coronado Drives and along Brightwater Drive. The district is characterized by older motel development. The amendments are intended to prevent this district from becoming too intensive by providing minimum open space between buildings. The amendments specify that the Tourist zoning district side and rear setback regulations will apply within the SAP boundaries, unless otherwise specified, such as for the Small Motel District. The City's development code establishes side and rear setback ranges per use in the Tourist zoning district. Beach By Design subjects properties on Coronado Drive, which receive allocations from the Hotel Density Reserve, to front setback and stepback regulations. The amendments subject properties on Hamden Drive, receiving allocations from the density pool, to the same setback and stepback regulations. The amendments are intended to prevent development along Hamden ~--------------------------------------------------~------------------ PINELLAS PLANNING COUNCIL ACTION: The Council received, accepted and authorized transmittal to the Countywide Planning Authority for receipt and acceptance (vote 8-0). l C_O_U_N T_Y_W_ID_E P_1A N_N_IN_G A_U_T_'B_O_RJ T_Y_A_C_T_1_0_N_: ------------------= I 1 H:\USERS\Countvwide Plan Mao\Amendments\2014\02 February\Reports\CW 01-25 (SAP Chanl(e No. 8-2014).docx

SUBJECT: Case CW 01-25 (SAP Change No. 8-2014) Drive from becoming too intensive by minimizing building mass and maintaining a pedestrianfriendly environment. The amendments replace the associated graphics illustrating the setback and stepback regulations with those that are intended to be more informative. The City has received a number of hotel development agreements for properties requesting allocations from the Hotel Density Reserve, which is Beach By Design's hotel room density pool. Beach By Design requires developments receiving room allocations from the density pool to meet operational characteristics which are intended to prevent these developments from operating as something other than a temporary lodging establishment, such as a primary residence or a vacation home. The proposed amendments provide additional operational characteristics criteria, addressing length of occupancy and prohibiting full kitchens, to further this goal. The amendments also specify that the Hotel Density Reserve shall not be used to render nonconforming density conforming, in response to a request previously made and denied by the City Council. IL FINDINGS Staff submits the following findings in support of the recommendation for approval of the amendment to the Beach By Design Special Area Plan: A. The proposed changes are consistent_ with the overall objectives of the Beach By Design Special Area Plan and are minor in nature. B. The changes are consistent with the Countywide Rules and will maintain consistency with the Updated Countywide Plan for Pinellas County (The Countywide Plan). C. The submittal satisfies a condition placed on the original approval of Beach By Design (as part of Case #CWO 1-25) that required the City to submit any amendment to the special area plan to the Pinellas Planning Council (PPC) and the Countywide Planning Authority (CPA) for review and consideration. In summary, Council staff has reviewed the above proposed revisions to the special area plan and has concluded that these changes are not considered to be substantive relative to the Countywide Rules and the CRD plan category; therefore it is recommended this request be received and accepted by the PPC and CPA, pursuant to the requirements of Section 4.2.7.6.3 of the Countywide Rules. IlL PLANNERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PAC) At their February 3, 2014 meeting, the PAC members discussed and recommended approval of staff recommendation (vote 9-0). IV. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Attachment 3 Attachment 4 City of Clearwater Ordinance No. 8497-14 Map of Beach By Design Special Area Plan Area Map of Land Use Districts, from City of Clearwater's Beach By Design PAC Summary Actions Sheet 2

ATTACHMENT I ORDINANCE NO. 8497-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, FLORIDA MAKING AMENDMENTS TO BEACH BY DESIGN: A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR CLEARWATER BEACH AND DESIGN GUIDELINES; BY AMENDING SECTION II. FUTURE LAND USE, SUBSECTION F. SMALL MOTEL DISTRICT, BY ESTABLISHING MINIMUM SIDE SETBACKS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE DISTRICT; BY AMENDING SECTION V. CATALYTIC PROJECTS, SUBSECTION B.2 HOTEL DENSITY RESERVE, TO EXPAND THE CRITERIA HOTELS MUST MEET IN ORDER TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR AN ALLOCATION OF HOTEL ROOMS FROM THE RESERVE; BY AMENDING SECTION VII. DESIGN GUIDELINES, SUBSECTION D. SETBACKS AND STEPBACKS, CLARIFYING THAT SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS ARE GOVERNED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE OR APPLICABLE CHARACTER DISTRICT PROVISIONS AND EXPANDING THE PROVISION FOR CERTAIN SETBACK AND STEPBACK REQUIREMENTS FOR HOTELS USING THE HOTEL DENSITY RESERVE ALONG CORONADO DRIVE TO ALSO APPLY TO HAMDEN DRIVE; CERTIFYING CONSISTENCY WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND PROPER ADVERTISEMENT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Clearwater Beach is a major contributor to the economic health of the City overall and the City desires to support the tourism industry; and WHEREAS, the City of Clearwater established the hotel density reserve in Beach by Design to incentivize hotel development on Clearwater Beach; and WHEREAS, to achieve the goals envisioned by the Hotel Density Reserve, hotels receiving units from the Reserve shall have certain operational characteristics; WHEREAS, it is desirable to minimize building mass along Hamden Drive and create an environment with a human scale; WHEREAS, minimum required side setback requirements have been deemed to appropriate in the Small Motel District to ensure that open space is provided between properties; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to Beach by Design have been submitted to the Community Development Board acting as the Local Planning Authority (LPA) for the City of Clearwater; and WHEREAS, the Local Planning Agency (LPA) for the City of Clearwater held a duly noticed public hearing and found that amendments to Beach by Design are consistent with the Clearwater Comprehensive Plan and the Clearwater Community Development Code; and WHEREAS, Beach By Design was originally adopted on February 15, 2001, and subsequently amended, now therefore, Ordinance No. 8497-!4

FLORIDA: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CLEARWATER, Section 1. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, Section II. Future Land Use, Subsection F. Small Motel District is amended as follows: F. Small Motel District The area to the east of the Beach District is an area of small motels, many of which have established clientele. The Small Motel District reflects a common paradox of beachfront communities -- improvements which were constructed in a different time before jet travel and air conditioning -- with limited on-site amenities and off-street parking. In many parts of the country, these kinds of units have evolved into residential uses. However, the relative intensity of adjacent land uses and the volumes of north south traffic have maintained the current condition between Hamden and Coronado. Beach by Design contemplates that the existing improvements in the Small Motel District will be sustained over time. Although the existing improvements may not represent the theoretical "highest and best" use of this area, the relatively good condition of most buildings and the economic value of the existing improvements make it difficult, if not impossible, to anticipate significant land assembly, demolition and new development. Brightwater Drive is also developed with small motel uses with building conditions and transient populations similar to those found along Hamden and Coronado. Brightwater's location on the Intracoastal Waterway, in between two other stable residential "fingers", makes it riper for redevelopment. Beach by Design calls for the redevelopment of Brightwater with land uses and building mass which are compatible with the residential cui-de-sacs to the north and south. Mid-rise townhouses and timeshares between 2-4 stories above parking are contemplated. Additionally, consideration should be given to the development of a shared parking facility along the street to provide some of the required parking that will be associated with redevelopment. Due to the compact nature of this district. its location in the heart of the tourist area and the potential for intensive redevelopment. minimum side setbacks of 1 0 feet for all development are hereby established to ensure that adequate open space is provided between properties. Section 2. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, Section V. Catalytic Projects, B. Community Redevelopment District, Subsection 2. Hotel Density Reserve, is amended as follows: 2. Hotel Density Reserve (20Q.7.13 Update) ********** The allocation of hotel rooms from the Reserve shall be made through the approval of a development agreement with the City of Clearwater with said allocation being strictly controlled. In order to be eligible to draw units from the Hotel Density Reserve, a development would have to incorporate, meet, and/or abide by each of the following: 2 Ordinance No. 8497-14

Those properties and/or developments that have acquired density from the Destination Resort Density Pool are not eligible to have rooms allocated from the Reserve; Those properties and/or developments that have had density transferred off to another property and/or development(s) through an approved Transfer of Development Rights (TOR) application by the City after December 31, 2007, are not eligible to have rooms allocated from the Reserve; : The Hotel Density Reserve shall not be used to render nonconforming density conforming; A maximum of 100 hotel rooms may be allocated from the Reserve to any development with a lot size less than 2.5 acres. Those developments with a lot size greater than or equal to 2.5 acres may use the Reserve to achieve a density of 90 hotel rooms per acre. However, in no instance shall the density of a parcel of land exceed 150 units per acre regardless of whether it has received benefit of transfers of development rights or units through a termination of status of nonconformity in addition to the Reserve, or not; Accessory uses inconsistent with amenities typical of a mid-priced hotel shall require compliance with the base FAR requirements of the Resort Facilities High (RFH) Future Land Use category; No hotel room allocated from the Reserve may be converted to a residential use (i.e. attached dwelling); All units in a hotel receiving units from the Reserve shall be made available to the public as overnight transient hotel guests at all times through the required hotel reservation system. Occupancy in any hotel receiving units from the Reserve is limited to a term of less than one (1) month or thirty-one (31) consecutive days, whichever is less and units in such a hotel shall not be used as a primary or permanent residence. No hotel room in a hotel allocated units from the Reserve may have a full kitchen. Mini kitchens. defined as including reduced sized kitchen appliances. may be permitted; The maximum building heights of the various character districts cannot be increased to accommodate hotel rooms allocated from the Reserve; When both the allocation of hotel rooms from the Reserve and the transfer of development rights (TOR) are utilized as part of a development, only hotel rooms brought in to the project through the TOR process are eligible to be constructed above the otherwise maximum building height, but only provided that all TOR criteria are met; : A legally enforceable mandatory evacuation/closure covena.nt that the overnight accommodation use will be closed as soon as practicable after a hurricane watch that includes Clearwater Beach is posted by the National Hurricane Center; : Access to overnight accommodation units must be provided through a lobby and internal corridors; All hotel rooms obtained from the Reserve that are not constructed shall be returned to the Reserve; 3 Ordinance No. 8497-14

The development shall comply with the Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) countywide approach to the application of concurrency management for transportation facilities, and the transportation analysis conducted for the development shall include the following: Recognition of standard data sources as established by the MPO; Identification of level of service (LOS) standards for state and county roads as established by the MPO; Utilization of proportional fair-share requirements consistent with Florida Statues and the MPO model ordinance; Utilization of the MPO Traffic Impact Study Methodology; and Recognition of the MPO designation of "Constrained Facilities" as set forth in the most current MPO Annual Level of Service Report; A reservation system shall be required as an integral part of the hotel use and there shall be a lobby/front desk area that must be operated as a typical lobby/front desk area for a hotel would be operated; and The books and records pertaining to use of each hotel room shall be open for inspection by authorized representatives of the City, upon reasonable notice, in order to confirm compliance with these regulations as allowed by general law. Section 3. Beach by Design: A Preliminary Design for Clearwater Beach and Design Guidelines, Section VII. Design Guidelines, Subsection D. Setbacks and Stepbacks, are amended as follows: ********** 2. Side and Rear Setbacks Except for the setbacks set forth above, no side or rear setback lines are recommended, except as may be required to comply with the City's Fire Code. Side and rear setbacks shall be governed by the provisions of the Tourist District of the Community Development Code unless otherwise prescribed in the applicable Character District provisions contained in Section II., Future Land Use. 3. Coronado and Hamden Drive. Setbacks and Stepbacks. To reduce upper story massing along the street and ensure a human scale street environment, buildings using the hotel density reserve along Coronado and Hamden Drive. shall be constructed in accordance with the following: a. Buildings constructed with a front setback of fifteen feet (15') or more shall stepback with a minimum depth of fifteen feet (15') from the setback line at a height not more than twenty-five feet (25'). Insert new graphic: 4 Ordinance No. 8497-14

DIAGRAM 'A' b. Buildings constructed with a front setback greater than or equal to ten feet (10') and less than fifteen feet (15') shall stepback at a height not more than twenty feet (20'). The required stepback/ setback ratio is one and one-half feet (1.5') for every one foot (1 ') reduction in setback in addition to the minimum stepback of fifteen feet ( 15'). Insert new graphic: ax 6~~ N Hl'l.'2fiiQ!i!.. DIAGRAM '8' EXAMPLE c. Buildings constructed with a front setback of less than ten feet ( 1 0') shall provide a building stepback at a height not more than fifteen feet (15'). The required stepbackl setback ratio is two and one-half feet (2.5') for every one foot (1 ') reduction in setback in addition to the minimum stepback of fifteen feet (15'). Insert new graphic: 5 Ordinance No. 8497-14

DIAGRAM 'C' EXAMPLE GQRQI!ADQ OR. OR HAMPfNOR, d. To achieve upper story facade variety and articulation, additional stepbacks may be required. To avoid a monotonous streetscape, a building shall not replicate the stepback configuration of the adjacent buildings including those across rights-of-way. Insert new graphic: DIAGRAM 'D' EXAMPLE 6 Ordinance No. 8497-14

e. Required stepbacks shall span a minimum of 75% of the building frontage width. Delete the following two graphics FAGADE VARIETY EXAMPLES PROHIBITED REQUIRED EXAMPLE#! EXAMPLE#2 *********** Section 4. The City Manager or designee shall forward said plan to any agency required by law or rule to review or approve same. Section 5. The City of Clearwater does hereby certify that the amendments contained herein, as well as the provisions of this Ordinance, are consistent with and in conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Section 6. Notice of the proposed enactment of this Ordinance has been properly advertised in a newspaper of general circulation in accordance with applicable law. Section 7. Should any part or provision of this Ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole, or any part thereof other than the part declared to be invalid. Section 8. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon adoption. PASSED ON FIRST READING PASSED ON SECOND AND FINAL READING AND ADOPTED George N. Cretekos Mayor 7 Ordinance No. 8497-14

Approved as to form: Attest: Leslie K. Dougaii-Sides Assistant City Attorney Rosemarie Call City Clerk 8 Ordinance No. 8497-14

Legend Residential Commercial Public I Semi-Public Residential Urban Commercial General Preservation Residential Medium Residential High Institutional Recreation I Open Space Special Designations [~ water Community Redevelopment D Central Business District ~ Scenic/Noncommercial Corridor Attachment 2 - Map of Beach By Design Plan Area CASE#: CW01-25 (SAP Change No. 8-2014) JURISDICTION: Clearwater

Attachment 3: Map of Land Use Districts, from City of Clearwater's Beach By Design Functional Land L'. e Di tricts OLD FLORIDA... DESTI ATION' RESORT INA RE:TAILJ RESTAURANT... PIER 60 BEACH WALK SOUTH BEACH/ CLEARWATER PASS

.. Attachment 4 PAC AGENDA- SUMMARY AGENDA ACTION SHEET DATE: February 3, 2014 ITEM I. MINUTES OF REGULAR PAC MEETING Am~roved December 30,2013 ACTION TAKEN Motion: Dean Neal Second: Jan Norsoph II. REVIEW OF PPC AGENDA FOR FEB. 12,2014 A. Subthreshold Land Use Plan Amendments- Am~roved 1. Case CW 14-05: City of Dunedin Motion: Dean Neal Second: Danny Taylor B. Regular Land Use Plan Amendments- Armroved subject to four enumerated 2. Case CW 14-06: (SAP Adoption 2014)- conditions City of St. Petersburg CARP Motion: Dean Neal Second: Jan Norsoph 3. Case CW 14-07: City of St. Petersburg Continued to April 9, 2014 Motion: Dean Neal Second: Jan Norsoph C. Minor Plan Change: Case CW 01-25 (SAP Receive/ Accept for transmittal to the Change No. 8-2014) Beach by Desigg- City Count~ide Planning Authority of Clearwater Motion: Dean Neal Second: Bob Klute D. Truth in Annexation Online Worksheet - Approved Uodate for 2013/14 Fi...t..::v""ar ~ Mo T'> ~ 1~ TT ) ~Secc 1d: Dean eal E. Annexation Reoort J "'',; 1Uarv ~1 ll...ro Inf hnation Onlv ~ ' F. CPA Actions - January 2014 -- No Action- Information Only VOTE 8-0 8-0 9-0 9-0 9-0 9-0 G. PPC/MPO Unification Update No Action- Information Only H. Count~ide Plan and Transportation Update- No Action- Information Only Technical Memo II- Updated Count~ide Linda Fisher presented PowerPoint noting Plan the Council will be asked to Receive/ Accept. III. OLD BUSINESS - None IV. OTHER PAC BUSINESS/PAC DISCUSSION Derek Kilborn noted article of possible AND UPCOMING AGENDA- interest in the Neighborhood Times - copy attached -re: preservation of green space V. ADJOURNMENT 2:30 Respectfully Submitted, PAC Chairman Date