CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

Similar documents
Charlottesville Planning Commission, Neighborhood Associations & News Media

ARTICLE III. RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS DIVISION 1. GENERALLY

PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT (PRD)

Approval of Amendment to City Code Chapter 34 (Zoning) Read Brodhead, Zoning Administrator of the City of Charlottesville

(1) At least ten percent of the total units are designated for low income households.

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

ORDINANCE NO

RC ; Reclassification The Garrison at Stafford Proffer Amendment (formerly Stafford Village Center)

Amendment to the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances; Consider Repeal Cluster Development Standards

CPC CA 3 SUMMARY

RECOMMENDATION REPORT

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN

Chapter 17.90: Affordable Housing Incentives

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

B. The Plan is in conformity with the Comprehensive Plan.

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

Title 8 - ZONING Division AFFORDABLE HOUSING. Chapter RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS

1. Applicants, Michael and Mary Phillips are the owners of a property located

COUNTY OF EL DORADO, CALIFORNIA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS POLICY. Policy Number B-14 Date Adopted: 12/11/2007

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

Zoning Text Amendment to Allow Hotels and Public Parking Lots as By- Right Uses in the M-1 Zoning District

Lacey UGA Residential density

Amendments to Transfer of Development Rights Program

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 415 INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

ORDINANCE NO

MEMORANDUM. 407 West Patterson Place: Appeal of Town Manager Decision (File No ) INTRODUCTION

R3 (MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE)

Town of Gorham Development Transfer Fee Program SECTION XVIII DEVELOPMENT TRANSFER OVERLAY DISTRICT

Chapter 14C - INCLUSIONARY HOUSING [42]

Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 35 Article 7: R-M Mobile Home Residential Districts Amendments:

RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

Ordinance No. 04 Series of 2013 RECITALS

VILLAGE OF JUSTICE ORDINANCE NO

NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH... JANUARY 23, 2018

MASON COUNTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 16, PLATS AND SUBDIVISIONS CHAPTERS AND 16.21

CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS

(5b) R-2 (two family), consisting of areas where the predominant land use is residential, within single-family-detached and two-family dwellings;

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GIG HARBOR, WASHINGTON, RELATING TO LAND USE AND ZONING, AND IMPLEMENTING LIMITATIONS

Town of Cumberland Town Council Neighborhood Meeting Notice Monday, December 12, 2016 at 5:30 P.M. Town Council Chambers

EXHIBIT B FINDINGS OF FACT BEND DEVELOPMENT CODE (BDC) UPDATE AMENDMENT PZ

550 North 800 West West Bountiful, Utah Phone (801) FAX (801) PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING 1801 WILLIAMS BOULEVARD BUILDING B, 1ST FLOOR KENNER, LOUISIANA PHONE (504)

BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of Chesterfield County:

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT

DATE: September 18, 2014 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Douglas Spondello, Associate Planner

# Coventry Rezoning, Variation and Preliminary/Final PUD Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

Business Park District Zoning Text Amendment (PLNPCM ) ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT

ARTICLE 101 Workforce Housing Regulation

DT Downtown. a) Intent. The "downtown (DT) district" is designed for the commercial core of Lake Worth, primarily along Lake and Lucerne Avenues from

ORDINANCE NO

VOLUME II - APPENDIX B - BASIC ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE V. DISTRICT REGULATIONS

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

Draft Zoning Changes for the 2nd Planning Board Public Hearing, January 22, 2018.

SECTION PLANNED RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Accessory Dwelling Units

PLAN COMMISSION Wednesday, August 30, 2017

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 208 Article 21: Residential Unit Developments Amendments: ARTICLE XXI

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING ORDINANCE ADMINISTRATIVE RULES AND REGULATIONS

Cluster Development Princeton Township, Mercer County

MEMORANDUM. Critical Areas Ordinance Density Requirements

CHAPTER 1268 R-1-F (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, GOLF COURSE COMMUNITY)

ARTICLE 7 R-1 LOW DENSITY ONE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Updated 5/4/13

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER OF THE MOSES LAKE MUNICIPAL CODE ENTITLED "RESIDENTIAL ZONES"

Paseo de la Riviera. August 12, 2015

1. ROLL CALL Richardson (Vice-Chair) Vacant Bisbee Hamilton Wells Roberts-Ropp Carr (Chair) Peterson Swearer

a public hearing was held before the Parks and Recreation Board on June 11, 2009, to receive public input; and

MEETING TYPE: Board of Commissioners - Regular. MEETING DATE: 21 Nov STAFF RESPONSIBLE: Chris Rice. DEPARTMENT: Planning & Zoning Division

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)

ADDING CHAPTER TO THE SAN MATEO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ART IN PUBLIC PLACES

GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA. For Granting Tax Abatement in the North Killeen Revitalization Area. Designated by the City of Killeen, Texas

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE

TOWN OF LANTANA. Preserving Lantana s small town atmosphere through responsible government and quality service.

ARTICLE SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS

DIVISION 7. R-6 AND R-6A RESIDENTIAL ZONES* The purpose of the R-6 residential zone is:

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

IMPORTANT UPDATED ADVISORY ON TAX SHELTER ABUSE INVOLVING CONSERVATION DONATIONS


PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING

The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District:

BY AUTHORITY A BILL For an ordinance adopting a new Article VI in Chapter 27 of the Denver Revised

1 ORDINANCE 4, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM 5 BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA AMENDING CHAPTER TAXATION.

TO: Glynn County Board of Commissioners. Eric Landon, Planner II. ZM2773 Peppertree Crossing Phase II

SECTION 866 APARTMENT CONVERSION

Charlottesville Planning Commission, Neighborhood Associations & News Media

ORDINANCE NO

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 21, 2017

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017

PLANNING SERVICES MEMORANDUM

ZONING ORDINANCE: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY. Hamburg Township, MI

5. Project Description including type and square footage of units:

# Grant St. Apartments Preliminary/Final PUD Project Review for Planning and Zoning Commission

Attachment 4 ANALYSIS I. Current Special Exception Use Standards for Accessory Apartments (Also See Attachment 2 Table for Quick Comparison)

March 6, The County Board of Arlington, Virginia. Ron Carlee, County Manager

HOUSING OPPORTUNITY ORDINANCE

Transcription:

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES MEMORANDUM To: Charlottesville Planning Commission From: Brian Haluska, Neighborhood Planner Date: October 21, 2008 Re: Zoning Text Amendment Request Background The Planning Commission voted at their August meeting to initiate a zoning text amendment examining the density limitations in the R-3, R-UMD and R-UHD districts. The proposal came from the owners of multi-family residential housing, primarily occupied by students. The reasoning behind the request is that the current unit per acre standard leads developers of student housing to construct projects comprised entirely of 4 bedrooms units. The developers propose a standard based on bedrooms per acre, which would not increase the number of potential bedrooms the developers could build, but would introduce flexibility into the unit layout of the buildings permitting the construction of 1 and 2 bedroom units. Analysis The proposed change based on the issue the University area developers pointed out, would be to multiply the number permissible dwelling units per acre by 4, and change the language to bedrooms per acre. Thus, 21 dwelling units per acre would become 84 bedrooms per acre. A wider variety of units would allow a single student to rent a 1- bedroom unit, and groups of students to rent units that have the requisite number of bedrooms they desire. Because the City s restriction on the number of unrelated persons that may reside in a property is based on the number of units, a density limitation based on bedrooms could potentially increase the number of residents permitted in a development. A simple example of this is that one 4-bedroom unit can currently legally accommodate 4 unrelated persons, or 1 per bedroom. Under the proposed amendment, a developer could construct two 2-bedroom apartments and have the same density as one 4-bedroom apartment. These two units could each legally accommodate 4 unrelated individuals, or a total of eight persons. The below table shows that by basing the density on a bedroom calculation, the proposed change could potentially double the amount of people permitted to reside in a development. It should be noted that several privately owned County apartment

complexes restrict the number of lessees to 2 per bedroom in a unit. So the situation described above is not outside the realm of possibility. Density Limit (per Acre) Maximum units Per Acre Potential Persons Per Acre 21 Dwelling units 21 Units 84 Persons 84 Bedrooms 84 Units 168 Persons 43 Dwelling units 43 Units 172 Persons 172 Bedrooms 172 Units 344 Persons 64 Dwelling units 64 Units 256 Persons 256 Bedrooms 256 Units 512 Persons 87 Dwelling Units 87 Units 348 Persons 348 Bedrooms 348 Units 696 Persons Based on these calculations, the proposal can be seen as a density increase that has the potential to double the number of residents in the targeted zones. Such an increase would primarily affect the availability of parking in the affected areas. In spite of the potential number of residents doubling, the parking regulations for a development would remain the same, at one space per two bedrooms. Recommendation The opinion of staff is that the proposal could result in a density increase in the residential areas that primarily serve the University student population. The potential for an increase in density anywhere in the City is one that must be weighed carefully. The potential to increase the density in existing buildings, and the impact of parking in surrounding neighborhoods is one that cannot be overlooked. Staff feels that the issue raised by apartment complex owners in the University area can be best dealt with via an alternative avenue requesting an increase in the allowable density measured in units per acre without a corresponding increase in allowable building size. Based on the proposal s current form, staff recommends the amendment be denied. Standard of Review The Planning Commission must make an advisory recommendation to City Council. Council may amend the zoning ordinance upon finding that the proposed amendment would serve the interests of public necessity, convenience, general welfare, or good zoning practice. The factors to consider in weighing the merit of a zoning text amendment include conformity with the comprehensive plan, furthering the purposes of the zoning code and the community s general welfare, and ascertaining the need and justification for the change. Suggested motions

1. I move to recommend approval of this zoning text amendment, to amend and re-ordain Sections 34-367 through 34-370 and Section 34-420 of the Charlottesville City Code (1990) as amended (Zoning Ordinance) to make changes to the regulations of Regulations for Multifamily Residential Developments on the basis that the changes would serve the interests of the general public welfare and good zoning practice. 2. I move to recommend denial of this zoning text amendment, to amend and reordain Sections 34-367 through 34-370 and Section 34-420 of the Charlottesville City Code (1990) as amended (Zoning Ordinance) to make changes to the regulations of Regulations for Multifamily Residential Developments on the basis that the changes would not serve the interests of [public necessity, convenience, general public welfare, and/or good zoning practice] for the following reasons:

AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 34 OF THE CODE OF THE CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE (1990), AS AMENDED Article III of the City Code concerning Residential Zoning Districts Amend Article III (Residential Zoning Districts), Division 3 (Regulations Multifamily Residential Developments), Sections 34-367 through 370 and Division 7 (Use Matrix), Sections 34-420, as follows: Sec. 34-367. Bedrooms--Limitation of number in R-UMD and R-UHD Districts. Within the R-UMD and R-UHD zoning districts, the number of bedrooms permitted within a multifamily development shall be restricted as follows: (1) Density of 3-21 DUA: R-UMD: Eighty-four (84) bedrooms per acre, maximum; not more than four (4) bedrooms per dwelling unit R-UHD: Eighty-four (84) bedrooms per acre, maximum; not more than four (4) bedrooms per dwelling unit (2) Density of 22-64 DUA: R-UMD: One hundred fifty (150) bedrooms per acre, maximum; not more than: Four (4) bedrooms per dwelling unit (units attributable to density of up to twenty-one (21) DUA), and Three (3) bedrooms per dwelling unit (units attributable to density in excess of twentyone (21) DUA) R-UHD: Two hundred fifteen (215) bedrooms per acre, maximum; not more than: Four(4) bedrooms per dwelling unit (units attributable to density of up to twenty-one (21) DUA), and Three (3) bedrooms per dwelling unit (units attributable to the density in excess of twenty-one (21) DUA) (3) For densities in excess of sixty-four (64) DUA approved by special use permit within the R-UHD district, the city council may establish reasonable conditions limiting the number of bedrooms per dwelling unit. (9-15-03(3); 6-6-05(2)) Sec. 34-368 367. Density bonus, R-UMD and R-UHD. Within a multifamily development proposed within any R-UMD or R-UHD district, an additional five (5) units twenty (20) bedrooms shall be allowed over and above the number of units bedrooms permitted by the density limitations of the applicable zoning district, for each single-family detached dwelling owned by the developer and for which the developer records restrictive covenants requiring such dwelling, for so long as it remains a residential use, to be: (i) owner-occupied, and (ii) used and occupied by no more than two (2) persons unrelated by blood or marriage. To qualify for this bonus, the single-family detached dwelling must be located within an R- 1(U) or R-2(U) zoning district within the city, and the restrictive covenants must be recorded prior to approval of the preliminary site plan for the multifamily development to which the bonus units will be applied. (9-15-03(3))

Sec. 34-369 368. Retail sales and consumer service uses. Sec. 34-370 369. Property management offices. Sec. 34-420. Use matrix--residential zoning districts Use Types ZONING DISTRICTS R-3 R-UMD R-UHD RESIDENTIAL AND RELATED USES Residential density (developments) 1--84 Bedrooms per acre B B B 85--172 Bedrooms per acre S B B 173-256 Bedrooms per acre S B 257-348 Bedrooms per acre S S Requirements 34- xxxx