CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FENTON SEWER SYSTEM FINANCIAL OVERVIEW MARCH, 2018

Similar documents
Building & Site Sinking Fund Election

STAFF REPORT. Authorization to Proceed with Proposition 218 Notification and Public Hearing Process in Connection with Proposed Sewer User Fee

METROPOLITAN NORTH GEORGIA WATER PLANNING DISTRICT CONSERVATION PRICING GUIDANCE JANUARY 2014

Ontario Rental Market Study:

The only dedicated operating revenue source for cities in Oklahoma is sales tax. While many cities utilize Ad Valorem (property tax) taxes for

EN Official Journal of the European Union L 320/373

Submission on Bill 7, The Promoting Affordable. Housing Act. Standing Committee on Social Policy Legislative Assembly of Ontario.

SECTION 3 FEES AND CHARGES

Summary. Draft Redevelopment Plan Summary Flowery Branch Tax Allocation District # 1:

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC WORKS COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

PROPERTY ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION

Keys Energy Services Relocation of Electrical Facilities Frequently Asked Questions

Orange Water and Sewer Authority Water and Sewer System Development Fee Study

DRAFT REPORT. Boudreau Developments Ltd. Hole s Site - The Botanica: Fiscal Impact Analysis. December 18, 2012

16 April 2018 KEY POINTS

CHAPTER VIII 1 PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR RETAINING TANKS

Auditing PP&E, Including Leases

08/07/ STATE PRIMARY MANISTEE COUNTY

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGFIELD NOTICE OF HEARING ON CLINTON OAKLAND SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM SOFTWATER LAKE EXTENSION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ROLL

City of Stockton. Legislation Text AUTHORIZE ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 501 AND 509 WEST WEBER AVENUE

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FENTON BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINUTES FOR REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 3, 2009

PROPOSED STATE STREET ROAD SANITARY SEWER DISTRICT

AB 346 (DALY) REDEVELOPMENT: HOUSING SUCCESSOR: LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING ASSET FUND JOINT AUTHOR ASSEMBLYMEMBER BROUGH

Lease-Versus-Buy. By Steven R. Price, CCIM

ORDINANCE NUMBER

Q: When will the first SID payment become due?

Report and Recommendations of the Chelsea City Study Committee

Housing Commission Report

Halifax Water Rate Pricing and Stormwater Management Programs. March 4 th, 2013

808 & 880 FOR SALE EAST MILL STREET 2 BUILDINGS LEASED TO SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SOLD TOGETHER OR SEPARATELY

TULSA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (A Component Unit of the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma) FINANCIAL REPORTS June 30, 2018 and 2017

3. FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 29

11 Essential Steps to Purchasing or Selling Your Veterinary Practice

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FENTON BOARD OF TRUSTEES MINUTES FOR REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2008

Memorial Northwest Homeowners Association Master Plan Project Phasing

MODEL ORDINANCE Certificate of Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) Compliance

STAFF REPORT. Grandview Beach and Paradise Point Water System Funding and Connection Costs

Frequently Asked Questions: June 26, 2018 Adopted Amendments to the City of Santa Cruz Sanitary Sewer Ordinance

BUILDING SANITARY SERVICE REPAIR ASSISTANCE PROGRAM

CHAPTER 24 F FLOOD ZONE OVERLAY DISTRICT

PROPERTY BAROMETER Residential Property Affordability Review The recently improving Housing Affordability trend stalled in the 1 st quarter of 2017

Solutions to Questions

Revenue Summary Chart - Sewer Service Fees

M A N I T O B A ) Order No. 118/15 ) THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD ACT ) November 19, 2015

You Get What You Pay For: Special Assessments Fund Public Improvements

Planning and Development Department Building and Development Permit Summary Report

HERSHEY COMMUNITY CENTER

Parks & Recreation Master Plan Update. Chapter 7: Park Land Dedication & Park Impact Fee Ordinances & Other Strategies. Town of.

TANGIBLE CAPITAL ASSETS

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Proposed Abington Terrace Development Abington Township, Montgomery County

820 First Street, NE, Suite 510, Washington, DC Tel: Fax:

ARTICLE XVIII MISCELLANEOUS

Current Situation and Issues

Charter Township of Bedford 115 S. ULDRIKS DRIVE BATTLE CREEK, MICHIGAN 49037

A Guide to Water Supply Replacement and Subsidence Damage Repair

M I N U T E S AGENDA MEETING OF HAMPTON TOWNSHIP COUNCIL WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2017

CLARK COUNTY NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION PLAN. Effective Date. January 1, Revised

things to consider if you are selling your house

CAAR Market Report 2010 Mid-Year Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS

5-1 L ECTURE LAUNCHER PAGES PAGES

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PINOLE ADDING CHAPTER SANITARY SEWER LATERALS TO THE PINOLE MUNICIPAL CODE

Finding an Apartment LESSON 4. Choosing an Apartment

Investment Guide. home loans

WASTEWATER SERVICE CHARGES EFFECTIVE FOR ALL BILLS ISSUED ON AND AFTER AUGUST 1, 2003

Sell Your House in DAYS Instead of Months

City of Whittier Penn Street, Whittier, California (562) Fax (562)

Re: Fairwinds Amenity Contribution Analysis

City of Richmond Municipal Code

How to Read a Real Estate Appraisal Report

PROPERTY OWNERS MEETING SEWER SERVICE RATES

Post Construction and Operations & Maintenance Guidance

SEWER RATES AND CHARGES

Chapter 15 Leases 15-1

Regional Jail Planning Frequently Asked Questions

MUNICIPAL A UTHORITY OF THE TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH FAYETTE

Building Permits & Inspections

ALGIERS RATE CASE FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Charlottesville Housing Market Report Year-End (Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS )

Shawnee Landing TIF Project. City of Shawnee, Kansas. Need For Assistance Analysis

CITY OF COLD SPRING ORDINANCE NO. 304

City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents

IFRS - 3. Business Combinations. By:

Valbridge Valuation Advisory

IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment. Uphold public interest

Village Hall At The Regatta P.O. Box 369 OFFICE OF. Village of Mamaroneck Private Sewer Lateral Law

TRANSMITTAL FROM The Mayor

ALBEMARLE COUNTY SERVICE AUTHORITY

CHARTER OF THE TOWN OF HANOVER, N.H.

MARCH GUIDE TO BUILDING CONDITION ASSESSMENTS and RESERVE FUND STUDIES

3 November rd QUARTER FNB SEGMENT HOUSE PRICE REVIEW. Affordability of housing

Benchmark Benzie! March 21, 2016 Benzie County, Michigan Court Place, Beulah, Michigan Benzie County is an Equal Opportunity Employer.

OREGON ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

CAAR Market Report 2010 First Quarter Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS

Buying Property in the San Juans

ADOPT RESOLUTIONS OF SUPPORT AND OPPOSITION FOR UPCOMING BALLOT MEASURES

COMPARISON OF THE LONG-TERM COST OF SHELTER ALLOWANCES AND NON-PROFIT HOUSING

ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

COMMERCIAL TAX ABATEMENT GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA PROCEDURES AND APPLICATION

ACT 425 AGREEMENTS: CAN THEY WORK FOR YOU? LAW, WEATHERS & RICHARDSON, P.C. 333 Bridge Street, NW, Suite 800 Grand Rapids, MI (616)

Municipal Home Rule Pilot Program Phase III APPLICATION

Transcription:

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FENTON SEWER SYSTEM FINANCIAL OVERVIEW MARCH, 2018 Fenton Township continues to receive inquiries regarding the relatively high sewer use fees that Township residents have been paying since 2006. The Township is sensitive to these concerns and understands that the high sewer use fees represent a financial burden for our citizens and businesses. This overview includes background information and provides details to explain the current financial status of Fenton Township s sanitary sewer system. Background Fenton Township entered into an Administrative Consent Order (ACO) with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) in 2002. This ACO mandated that the Township improve its sanitary sewer system in order to minimize the risk of sewage spills and overflows. It was then that Fenton Township implemented an aggressive program to: Conduct a video inspection of the Township s entire sanitary sewer system. Identify problem areas and determine the most cost-effective rehabilitation methods. Complete the necessary repairs, upgrades and/or replacements to restore the system to an adequate level of operation. Fenton Township spent approximately $24 million from 2002-2010 on the sewer rehabilitation project, (see graph below). The work completed included: Comprehensive inventory of the entire sewer system, including GPS location of nearly 2,500 manholes. Cleaning & video inspection of the entire sewer system (approximately 97 miles of sewer pipe). Excavation and replacement of approximately 6 miles of sewer pipe. Lining of approximately 5 miles of sewer pipe. Repaired more than 200 inflow/infiltration defects. Refurbished & repainted 22 sewer pump stations. Raised over 400 manholes to the proper grade. Repaired/rebuilt 45 manholes. Charter Township of Fenton Sanitary Sewer Capital Improvement Expenditures 5,000,000.00 4,500,000.00 4,000,000.00 3,500,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,500,000.00 2,000,000.00 1,500,000.00 1,000,000.00 500,000.00 0.00 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

The rehabilitation of the sewer system was substantially completed by the end of 2010, however the process of inspection and repairs on a smaller scale will continue on an ongoing basis. These system improvements were costly, however it is vitally important that the entire sewer system maintains an acceptable level of operation in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of our residents, schools and businesses. It was this need for extensive rehabilitation of the Township s sewer system due to its age and condition, combined with several economic factors, that created the situation in 2006 where the Fenton Township Sewer Fund was not able to meet the financial needs of the sewer system, which resulted in the increase in user fee rates to their current level. At the time of the rate increase in 2006, there were four primary factors involved in the Township s need to generate additional revenues: 1. Even though the Township had already allocated approximately $10 million to sewer system improvements, it was estimated that an additional $20 million would be needed to complete the necessary repair, upgrade and rehabilitation of the sewer system over the next several years. 2. Genesee County increased their charge to Fenton Township by $33.00 per quarter per unit in 2006. These costs relate to the operation and maintenance of the sewage treatment plant and the main interceptor sewer lines. 3. The Sewer Fund was experiencing a reduction in revenues due to lower levels of new development, (i.e. new connections to the sewer system). 4. A sewer debt retirement tax millage that was initiated in the 1960 s, (originally 1.5 mills), had dwindled to approximately 1/10 of one mill by 2006 due to Headlee rollback requirements, (this millage expired completely in 2008). As an enterprise or business-type fund, the Township s Sewer Fund is expected to be selfsupporting. Revenues generated in the Sewer Fund should cover both the cost of ongoing operation & maintenance of the sewer system, (Township and County), and the cost of periodic bond payments to retire the debt issued to construct, expand and/or improve the system. There are four different ways for the Township to generate revenues for the Sewer Fund: 1. Connection fees 2. Property taxes (voted millage) 3. Special assessments 4. User fees The Township Board developed and introduced an integrated financial plan proposal in 2006 that included a mix of property taxes (millage), special assessments and user fees. The Township Board placed a 2-mill tax proposal on the ballot in August of 2006, but that proposal was not approved by the voters. The Township also initiated proceedings to establish five separate special assessment districts to generate a portion of the needed revenues. Concerns raised at the special assessment public hearings, however, made it clear that the property owners did not feel that special assessments were equitable and an overwhelming majority of those in attendance indicated a preference for an additional rate increase rather than special assessments. That left user fees as the only revenue source option for the Township Board. Therefore, effective September 1, 2006, the sewer use fees were increased to $85.00 per unit per month, making the quarterly bill for most residential customers $255.00. The current breakdown of the quarterly sewer use billing rate of $255.00 per unit is as follows: Fee Component Quarterly Monthly Genesee County (Operation & Maintenance) $ 94.00 $ 31.33

Fenton Township (Operation & Maintenance) 68.00 22.67 Fenton Township (Debt Service) 93.00 31.00 It is important to understand that the cost of the repairs was not directly funded by the user fees. Bonds were sold to provide the funds to pay for the system rehabilitation. The use fees generate the revenue necessary to make the periodic payments on those bond issues. Summary and Current Projections The sewer use rates were increased drastically in 2006 because, by process of elimination, it was the only revenue source available to the Township to pay for the state-mandated sewer system rehabilitation. The increase in sewer use fees generates revenue to make the periodic payments on bonds issued to fund the cost of the system repairs. The large-scale sewer system rehabilitation project has been completed, however the bonds issued to fund the work won t be paid off until the late 2020 s. A sewer user rate decrease is not anticipated within the next few years. Based on our current cash flow model, the Township may be able to consider a minor rate decrease within 5-6 years, but it will be approximately 10 years before the rate could drop below $200 per quarter. That outlook could change drastically, however, based on a number of factors, such as voter approval of a millage proposal, or if the volume of new connections increases significantly above current projections. Either one or combination of both of these factors could lower the sewer use rates sooner. The Fenton Township Board understands that the sewer use rates represent a burden on the finances of our residents and businesses. Unfortunately the Township is faced with a situation where the higher rates are the only viable alternative at this time. We will continue to closely monitor the status of the Sewer Fund to ensure its long-term financial stability, while also making sure the entire sanitary sewer system is properly maintained to provide consistent and reliable service to our citizens. Although Fenton Township s sewer rates are higher than other communities, our property tax millage rates are among the lowest in Genesee County. As a result, it is still less expensive to live in Fenton Township when compared to many surrounding communities. An analysis was developed to look at all local government related costs for those surrounding communities. These costs include property taxes, sewer fees and costs for fire protection, trash collection and mosquito control services (if not included in property taxes). The result is the following Cost of Living comparison:

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FENTON COMPARISON OF NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES "COST OF LIVING" (PROPERTY TAXES, SEWER FEES & OTHER ASSESSMENTS) Assumed Taxable Value 120,000 Community > Fenton Township City of Fenton City of Linden Mundy Township Grand Blanc Township City of Grand Blanc 2010 Population > 15,552 11,746 3,991 15,082 37,508 8,276 Property Taxes 3,723.09 4,980.16 4,892.23 4,155.10 4,532.28 5,247.23 Sewer Use Fees 1,020.00 612.72 563.40 385.44 476.04 607.81 Fire Protection 65.00 Trash Collection 141.00 133.72 145.32 115.06 118.20 133.56 Mosquito Control 20.00 0.00 0.00 Total 4,969.09 5,726.60 5,600.95 4,655.60 5,126.52 5,988.60 Average "Cost of Living" City of Grand Blanc 5,988.60 City of Fenton 5,726.60 City of Linden 5,600.95 Grand Blanc Township 5,126.52 Fenton Township 4,969.09 Mundy Township 4,655.60 Please see below for the answers to some of the most commonly asked questions regarding Fenton Township s sewer system. If you have further questions issue please contact the Township office at (810) 629-1537.

QUESTIONS & ANSWERS Why did the Township need more money for the sanitary sewer system? As explained in the overview, there were four primary factors affecting the Township s need to begin generating additional revenues in 2006: 1. The Sewer Fund was experiencing a reduction in revenues due to slower growth, (i.e. new connections to the sewer system). 2. The proceeds of the bonds previously issued to finance sewer repairs had been spent, however it was estimated another $20 million would be needed to complete the necessary repair, upgrade and rehabilitation of the sewer system over the next several years to comply with the state mandated Administrative Consent Order (ACO). 3. Genesee County increased their charge to Fenton Township by $33.00 per quarter per unit as of August 1, 2006. These costs are related to the operation and maintenance of the main interceptor sewer lines and the sewage treatment plant. The Township s Sewer Fund could not absorb this increase without passing it on to the sewer system users. 4. A sewer debt retirement tax millage that was initiated in the 1960 s, (originally 1.5 mills), had dwindled to approximately 1/10 of a mill in 2006 due to Headlee restrictions, (this millage expired completely in 2008). How much of the sewer system needed to be repaired or replaced? The initial video inspection process identified over 1,000 segments of sewer line with defects in need of repair or replacement, (a segment is a span of sewer pipe that extends from one manhole to the next and can range in length from 50 to 400 feet). In those 1,000+ segments of sewer pipe, over 5,000 individual defects, (broken pipe, cracks, leaks, root intrusions, etc.), were identified. Not all defects were high priority and many did not need to be addressed immediately. After a careful review and assignment of priorities, the Township Engineer determined that about half of the identified defects, (approximately 500+ pipe segments and 2,000+ defects), were considered to be priority items and needed to be either repaired or replaced as part of the project to be funded under the $20 million cost estimate. I read in the newspaper that the Township saved millions of dollars by utilizing an alternative repair method for the Torrey Road sewer line. Shouldn t that reduce the total amount needed? It is true that the Township saved approximately $4 million by using a state-of-the-art pipe lining process on the Torrey Road sewer main, instead of the traditional and more costly open cut method. As a result, the bond issue sold in 2007 was downsized from $15 million to $11 million. From an overall project perspective, although the Township authorized the sale of up to $20 million in bonds, a total of only $13.6 million was issued. Why did the sewer system need so much repair and rehabilitation? Most of the Township s sanitary sewer system was installed in the 1960 s and 70 s, using clay pipe, which is not as flexible or durable as the plastic pipe used today. The many lakes in Fenton Township also means that we have a very high water table and soil types that are less than ideal for sewer lines. The sewer lines are subjected to a great deal of underground movement and shifting, which causes the pipes to sag, crack and break. For many years we could only fix problems that became apparent due to a spill or an overflow. With the introduction of newer technology, we have the ability to use cameras to inspect the inside of sewer lines and identify problems before they become too large. This video inspection process allowed the Township to identify 30-40 years worth of accumulated problems in a relatively short time. Why wasn t something done sooner to generate more revenues? The Township did not know the extent of the needed system improvements until we were well into the state-mandated sewer rehabilitation project. As recently as the end of 2004 the Township was still maintaining a healthy cash reserve in the Sewer Fund and it appeared that

the existing fee structure would be adequate to fund the needs of the sewer system. When it became apparent that the volume of new connections in 2005 would fall well short of projections, the Township implemented a relatively small user rate increase at that time to help offset this shortfall. Several other factors, which were not known until late 2005 or early 2006, created the situation that resulted in the 2006 rate increase. 1. The unexpected drop to 110 new connections in 2005 was the lowest total in more than 10 years. New connections continued to decline for several more years, bottoming out at 4 in 2010. This Township has experienced a modest increase in new connections for the past seven years, however those numbers are still well below the peak years from the mid 1990 s through the early 2000 s, (see chart below). New sewer connections by year 1996 217 1997 171 1998 213 1999 438 2000 225 2001 162 2002 160 2003 201 2004 220 2005 110 2006 61 2007 22 2008 9 2009 10 2010 4 2011 8 2012 16 2013 29 2014 36 2015 90 2016 59 2017 68 2. The review, evaluation and prioritization of needed sewer system improvements were not completed until early 2006. 3. The 2006 Genesee County increase to the rate charged to Fenton Township was communicated to the Township only a few months prior to implementation and the Township s Sewer Fund could not absorb this increase without passing it on to the sewer system users. It is important to note that Genesee County implemented another rate hike in 2014 that increased the Township s costs by approximately $500,000 per year. Thus far the Township Board has not passed that increase on to the sewer system users. Instead, General Fund dollars have been transferred into the Sewer Fund, enabling it to meet the Township s sewer related financial obligations, including bond payments. Why not wait for a pipe to break before fixing it? Wouldn t that be cheaper? Undetected cracks or breaks in the sewer lines can cause two types of problems. Inflow and infiltration of ground water and storm water into the sanitary sewer system increases the volume of water being treated at the sewage plant, thus increasing the overall cost of sewage treatment. Cracks or breaks can also lead to sewer lines becoming blocked, which many times will result in a backup of sewage into one or more homes. Most communities, including Fenton Township, are only able to obtain minimal (if any) insurance coverage for sewage backups. Therefore, the cost to clean up a sewage backup and replace damaged property, (sometimes totaling over $50,000.00 per occurrence), can become a significant expense to the Township s Sewer Fund. Identifying and repairing problems before they create a catastrophe is much more cost effective. Our sewer use rates are the highest in Genesee County. Why don t other communities charge that much? The number of lakes and the topography of Fenton Township make our sanitary sewer system one of the most elaborate and costly to maintain in the entire state. You will not find any community in Genesee County that has anywhere near the 57 pump stations that are operated

and maintained by Fenton Township. Therefore it is virtually impossible to make a meaningful comparison of our fee structure with those of other communities because our system is much more costly to operate and maintain. Also, many communities use a mixture of tax revenue (millage), special assessments, connection fees and user fees to fund their system. Fenton Township currently utilizes only connection fees and user fees. Why can t the Township use General Fund money to pay for sewer system improvements? The Sewer Fund is an Enterprise or business type fund, and is intended to be self-sufficient. All costs associated with the operation and maintenance of the system should be paid for by revenues generated in the Sewer Fund. For the past several years, however, the Township has transferred funds from the General Fund to the Sewer Fund to address cash flow issues. The Township started proceedings to create special assessment districts in 2006. Why was that process stopped? The initial financial plan considered by the Fenton Township Board included a mixture of all four revenue types, (tax millage, special assessments, connection fees & user fees). When the millage proposal was defeated by the voters, the board decided to continue with special assessment proceedings as originally planned. At the special assessment public hearings many objections were raised regarding the difference in proposed assessment amounts among the five districts. Residents were also opposed to other aspects of the special assessments, (interest cost, requirement to be paid off if the property is sold, assessing properties that were not currently using the sewer system, etc.). This input from the public prompted the Township Board to reconsider this option and the board ultimately decided that a rate increase would be the most equitable method to generate the required revenues. Why not have Genesee County assume operation and maintenance responsibilities for the Township s sewer system? The Township has explored concept of having Genesee County take over operation and maintenance of the sewer system. The Township solicited a cost estimate from Genesee County for annual operation and maintenance and it was higher than what the Township was paying at that time. Also, regardless of who is responsible for maintenance, the Township would be responsible for the cost of all necessary improvements. Therefore, there does not appear to be any benefit to turning sewer system maintenance over to the County. One of the reasons given for the need for additional funds is a slower economy and decreased development, resulting in lower connection fee revenue. The economy has improved and development has increased recently. Will that result in a user fee rate reduction? While development has increased somewhat, the number of new sewer connections is still relatively low compared to the late 1990 s and early 2000 s and the improvements to the Sewer Fund cash flows have been very modest not yet enough to allow a rate reduction. If the volume of new connections to the sewer system increases significantly (150-200 units per year), the Township may be in a position to reduce the user rates at some point. The Township will only collect the revenues necessary to operate & maintain the sewer system, service the related debt and maintain adequate fund reserves. Sewer Fund dollars cannot be spent for any other purpose and the Township is not permitted to accumulate excessive amounts of cash reserves.