RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, the City of San José ( City ) has an interest in promoting affordable housing within the City; and

Similar documents
RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING A NEW COUNCIL POLICY No ENTITLED SURPLUS SALES

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING SECTION OF CHAPTER 4.46 AND SECTION OF CHAPTER 4

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE AMENDING RESOLUTION NO

RESOLUTION NO. RD:TDM:CER 6/1/2017

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

RESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, on April 8, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No to establish parkland fees for secondary units; and

Memorandum /14/17. FROM: Harry Freitas TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. DATE: February 9, 2017 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW. Date.

RESOLUTION NO. CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 587 SQ.FT. RD:EEH:LCP

Recommendation: The Public Works Director-Engineering recommends adoption of the following resolution.

San Carlos Wheeler Plaza Project, Disposal of Former Redevelopment Agency Property and Entry into Related Compensation Agreement

RESOLUTION NO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE THAT:

5.I iii ******#* FROM: 2. Provide comments to staff and recommend edits to the Resolution, as necessary, and adopt the Resolution as amended; or

Agenda Item No. 6E May 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, Interim City Manager

ORDINANCE NO. RD:SSG:LJR 7/24/2017

Memorandum TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL. FROM: Planning Commission. DATE: September 28, 2015 SUBJECT: SEE BELOW COUNCIL DISTRICT: 3

SAN RAFAEL CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, a map showing the location of such territory is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein by this reference; and

Staff Report. Victoria Walker, Director of Community and Economic Development

M E M O DECLARATION OF SURPLUS DISTRICT PROPERTY

SAN IPSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

December 13,2011. Resolution No Resolution of the Board of Directors Marina Coast Water District Approving a District Surplus Property Policy

ST. LAWRENCE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY CIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Resolution No. CDC January 23, 2013

TOWN OF WOODSIDE. Report to Town Council Agenda Item 6 From: Susan George, Town Manager July 26, 2011

RESOLUTION NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE THAT:

WHEREAS, the Board passed Resolution approving the aforementioned Guidelines; and

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, LOS ANGELES REGION AND THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO STAFF REPORT November 3, 2015

ST. LAWRENCE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Resolution No. IDA January 22, 2015

AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY. Express Short-Term Rental Prohibition. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director and the City Attorney s Office

MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROBIN DICKERSON, CITY ENGINEER

CITY OF SAN LEANDRO SUCCESSOR AGENCY OVERSIGHT BOARD. Cynthia Battenberg, Business Development Manager

Agenda Item No. 6B January 23, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Jeremy Craig, City Manager

STAFF REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

AGREEMENT FOR THE GIFT OF REAL PROPERTY. This AGREEMENT TO GIFT ( Agreement ), is made and entered into this day of

Forest). The SB 1022 RFP that proposes construction at the JAMF to add 384 beds is a necessarily included element contemplated as part of these previo

IRVINE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO

CITY OF ALAMEDA ORDINANCE NO. New Series

RD:JVP:JMD 01/10//2017 RESOLUTION NO.

ORDINANCE NO The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Joaquin ordains as follows:

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

RESOLUTION 5607 (10) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lompoc as follows:

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. T15-058

Buffalo Niagara Convention Center. Management Corporation. Property Disposition Guidelines

Chapter 17.90: Affordable Housing Incentives

OWNERS, BUSINESSES AND TENANTS PARTICIPATION AND RE-ENTRY RULES

Development Authority of the North Country Governance Policies

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

RESOLUTION NO

Property Disposition Compliance Process Governance Committee #1345, approved March 29, 2017

Meeting Date: March 14, 2018

Property Disposition Guidelines of the New Rochelle Industrial Development Agency

SURPLUS PROPERTY SALES PROCEDURES. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING COMMITTEE May 1, 2006

ORDINANCE NO. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE:

DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY/PERSONAL PROPERTY

CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018

[Disposition and Development Agreement - Seawall Lot 337 Associates, LLC - Mission Rock Project]

THE CITY OF LAKE FOREST ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE FOREST CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH A HOUSING TRUST FUND BOARD

Honorable Mayor and City Council Members Honorable Chair and Agency Board Members Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager/Executive Director

PISMO BEACH COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM

BATAVIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DISPOSITION OF REAL ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 2896 OF THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW

CITY OF YUBA CITY STAFF REPORT

CHAPTER 23A: SURPLUS CITY PROPERTY ORDINANCE

DISPOSITION OF REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY POLICY

Mayor and City Council, as and constituting The Board of Contra Costa County Sanitation District No. 6 (Board)

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

RESOLUTION NO. C. No other public utility facilities are in use on the Easement and no facilities would be affected by the vacation.

RESOLUTION NO

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAUSALITO APPROVING THE NINTH AMENDMENT TO THE LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAUSALITO AND THE NEW VILLAGE SCHOOL.

FRANKLIN COUNTY CIVIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY POLICY. I. Introduction

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Agenda Item No. 6G August 11, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: Laura C. Kuhn, City Manager. Gerald L. Hobrecht, City Attorney

INFORMATION SUBJECT: UPDATE ON COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN FOR PROPOSED GOOGLE DEVELOPMENT AT DIRIDON STATION

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

SUFFOLK COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES SUBJECT: SCWA PROPERTY DISPOSITION POLICY FILE UNDER SECTION NO: 9

ORDINANCE NO. Part 12 Tenant Protection Ordinance. This Part shall be known as the Tenant Protection Ordinance.

VILLAGE OF FAIRPORT LOCAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY GUIDELINES ADOPTED PURSUANT TO TITLE 5-A OF THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW

DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY/PERSONAL PROPERTY

CITY COUNCIL REPORT 2006-xx

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, The City of Santa Clara is the Government entity responsible for providing public

SanJose. Memorandum. \\[i[ Or. FROM: Jacky Morales-Ferrand TO: RULES AND OPEN GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE. SUBJECT: ALMADEN ROAD DATE: November 1, 2017

ORDINANCE NO

LOUISIANA HOUSING CORPORATION QUALIFIED CONTRACT PROCESSING GUIDELINES

Property Disposition Guidelines of the Erie County Industrial Development Agency ( ECIDA ), Buffalo and Erie County Regional Development Corporation;

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE SUNSET DATE FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY FEE DEFERRAL PROGRAM TO DECEMBER 31, 2016; AND

This FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE OF AIRPORT PREMISES is entered into this

San Joaquin County Grand Jury. Getting Rid of Stuff - Improving Disposal of City and County Surplus Public Assets Case No.

STEUBEN TOBACCO ASSET SECURITIZATION CORPORATION DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY GUIDELINES ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 2896 OF THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW

This Fifth Amendment to Lease of Airport Premises is entered into this day of

BID PROPOSAL FORMS FOR THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF CORONA IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

ORDINANCE NO

LEE COUNTY ORDINANCE NO 02-34

DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY POLICY

Transcription:

RD:EJM:LCP 4/15/2016 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE UPDATING THE CURRENT PROCEDURE FOR THE DISPOSITION OF SURPLUS CITY-OWNED PROPERTY TO REFLECT THE GENERAL TERMS OF ASSEMBLY BILL 2135 WHEREAS, the City of San José ( City ) has an interest in promoting affordable housing within the City; and WHEREAS, as a Charter City the City has plenary power over its municipal affairs and as such City is not required to follow the requirements of AB 2135 which sections modified provisions of Government Code Sections 54220 et seq., pertaining to the sale of surplus real property by a local agency, but has traditionally generally followed that Section; and WHEREAS, changes to California Government Code Section 54220 went into effect on January 1, 2015; and WHEREAS, the changes to California Government Code Section 54220 increases the ability for affordable housing developers to acquire surplus land, and can be used as an additional tool to support the development of affordable housing that is important for addressing the housing crisis in the area, but the changes also may impact the value of real property to be sold by the City and the impede the City s power to determine the future use of parcels to be sold; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to update the current procedure for the disposition of surplus City-owned real property to formalize the implementation of surplus sale procedures that generally follow the revised California Government Code Section 54220 T-29317 / 1279686_3.doc 1 Council Agenda: 4-26-16 Item No.: 4.1 DRAFT Contact the Office of the City Clerk at (408) 535-1260 or CityClerk@sanjoseca.gov for final document.

RD:EJM:LCP 4/15/2016 as described in the memorandum to the City Council from Kim Walesh, Director of Economic Development, and Jacky Morales-Ferrand, Director of Housing, dated April 15, 2016; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE THAT: The procedure for the disposition of surplus City-owned real property, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth herein, is hereby approved. ADOPTED this day of, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: DISQUALIFIED: ATTEST: SAM LICCARDO Mayor TONI J. TABER, CMC City Clerk T-29317 / 1279686_3.doc 2 Council Agenda: 4-26-16 Item No.: 4.1 DRAFT Contact the Office of the City Clerk at (408) 535-1260 or CityClerk@sanjoseca.gov for final document.

ATTACHMENT A Proposed Process to Determine Whether Property is Surplus to the needs of the City and Subsequent Sale of the Property A. Prepare the File - Real Estate staff will confirm ownership, prepare various documents related to size and configuration, develop a preliminary estimate of value, and identify any restrictions on use. B. Conduct Internal Review - Real Estate staff will communicate with internal stakeholders to determine if there is a current or intended future use of the subject property, in order to determine whether the property should be considered "needed for, or adaptable to, City use". C. Fiscal Analysis by Internal Stakeholders - If there is an interest expressed by an internal stakeholder, the requesting party conducts a fiscal analysis determining the cost/benefit of retaining the property. During the fiscal analysis Real Estate staff will determine if the property is independently developable and will develop a good faith estimate of the market value of the subject property. D. Retain Property in City Inventory - If it is determined that there is a bona fide need to keep the property for City purposes, the property is removed from the list of potential surplus properties. If it is determined the property should continue to be considered for surplus sale continue to Step E. E. Inform the City Council of the Results of Steps "A" through "D", above - Real Estate staff will prepare an informational memo to the City Council advising them of the results of steps "A" through "D", above (including identification of all internal stakeholders and outside parties with whom communications were had, and a summary of the basis for all conclusions reached) and, if applicable, staffs intention to proceed to surplus, market and dispose of the property. F. Response from City Council from Information Memo - If one or more of the Council responds to the Informational Memo requesting additional information Real Estate staff responds with the requested information. If there are no responses from the Council Real Estate staff proceeds to Step G. G. Initiate the 54222 Process - If no City use is identified, Real Estate staff prepares the notification letter in accordance with Government Code Section 54220 et seq. and distributes to the current list of open space, educational use, and the Housing Department for distribution to affordable housing agencies (Preferred Entities). The Preferred Entities will have sixty (60) days (notification period) to notify the City of their interest in entering into negotiations for the acquisition of the property. At the conclusion of the sixty (60) day negotiation period, if a Preferred Entity has contacted Real Estate and expressed an interest in acquiring the property proceed to Step H. If no Preferred Entities have contacted Real Estate proceed to Step I.

H. Request to Purchase Received from one or more Preferred Entities - If one or more Preferred Entities request to purchase a potential surplus property Real Estate staff will negotiate in good faith with each entity individually for a minimum of ninety (90) days (negotiation period). At the end of the negotiation period which began at the conclusion of the sixty (60) day notification period (or a total of 150 days) identified in Step G, there are three (3) options. Option One - A single Preferred Entity submitted a bid to purchase the property and the bid reflects the estimated market value of the property. Real Estate staff would continue to Step K. Option Two - There are more than one bid submitted from Preferred Entities. a. If the bids are from multiple Preferred Entities in affordable housing, open space, or educational use, the affordable housing bid is given the priority over the other submitted bidders. Real Estate staff negotiates with each affordable housing bidder until the highest most qualified bidder is determined. The highest most qualified bidder between multiple affordable housing entities is determined by the bidder that proposes the highest price for the property and the greatest number of units at the deepest level of affordability. Once the highest and most qualified bidder is determined continue to Step K. b. If the bids are from multiple Preferred Entities which does not include affordable housing, Real Estate staff negotiates with each bidding party until the highest most qualified bidder is determined. Once the highest and most qualified bidder is determined continue to Step K. Option Three - Staff are unable to reach an agreement with a Preferred Entity. Real Estate staff would continue to Step I. I. Initiate Public Outreach If no City use is identified, or there are no bids submitted by a Preferred Entity, or staff and the Preferred Entity are unable to reach an agreement, Real Estate staff will post a sign on the property notifying the public of the City's intent to surplus the property, post the surplus property on the Real Estate website, advertise the property in a local newspaper for a minimum of two consecutive weekends, post the property on various on-line services, and notify parties which have expressed an interest in acquiring the property. J. Complete Public Outreach - Real Estate staff responds to any inquiries related to the property. If there is an offer proceed to Step K. K. Complete Process - The transaction would either be with a Preferred Entity or private party and a determination needs to be made whether the property is developable or not. If the property is determined to be undevelopable proceed to Step L. If the property is determined to be developable proceed to Step M.

L. Determine if the property is undevelopable - Based upon the determination by Real Estate staff that the property: i) is not needed for, or adaptable to, City use, ii) is not independently developable, and iii) has a market value of less than $500,000, the City Manager may adopt the recommendation of the Director of Economic Development and decide to declare the subject property surplus, which decision shall include a summary of the basis for all conclusions reached concerning subsections i, ii and iii, immediately above. Such decision shall be posted on the City's website, whereupon staff may proceed with disposition of the property. Such decision will not be adopted any sooner than fourteen days following the date of the informational memo described in Step "E", above. If the subject property is not deemed surplus by action of the City Manager as provided above, or does not meet the criteria above (ie. the property is developable) any decision to surplus must be taken to City Council for approval. M. Property is developable -If the property is sold on the open market, the Surplus Sale policy requires that if it is ever used for the development of ten (10) or more residential uses, then the entity (or its successor-in-interest) must provide not less than fifteen percent (15%) of the total number of units developed on the parcel(s) at affordable prices for rental, for-sale, or long term lease (35 years or more) of the property. An affordable housing restriction documenting the total number of restricted units and the affordable prices must be recorded against the surplus land at the time of sale. The restriction is to run with the land for fiftyfive (55) years, and be enforceable against any owner (or its successor-in-interest) who violates the covenant or restriction. N. Prepare Annual Report of Surplus and Sold Properties - Real Estate staff will prepare an informational report of properties declared surplus and properties sold for the City Council on an annual basis. This report is intended, in particular, to highlight for the City Council those properties that staff intends to analyze for the surplus process, as well as those properties that have been declared surplus and sold in the prior time period, including those properties that were sold for affordable housing or where a housing restriction was recorded at the time of the transfer. O. Significant or Unusual Properties - The City Manager may modify the process described above from time to time in order to accommodate circumstances applicable to significant or unusual properties.