ASSIGNMENT 4: URBAN DESIGN AND HOUSING DESIGN

Similar documents
(OUSING 0ROPOSAL -OUNT!UBURN

Self-Guided Walking Tours Ground-oriented Housing Types. Cedar Cottage Tour Cambie Corridor Phase 3

Rule of corner may need to be flexible i.e. context school, park. With a clustered approach. Should row housing go where fourplexes are?

Pros & Cons of Multiple Product Types. January 21, What s different about multifamily? Renter Profiles. Townhomes

PLANNING COMMISSION. Study Session: Beach Boulevard Specific Plan Workshop

From Policy to Reality

PROJECT DESCRIPTION STATION 1300

UPDATE Board of Selectmen June 20, 2017

PIN , Part 1, Plan SR-713 in Lot 2, Concession 5, Township of McKim (1096 Dublin Street, Sudbury)

H6 Residential Terrace Housing and Apartment Buildings Zone

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

History of Broadview Avenue

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

LIN AVE The applicant is proposing to construct a four-unit Lot A R.P

6.0 DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES

1 Application Form 4

320 Maple Mixed Use PDR Narrative Fort Collins, CO Project # 1525

DRAFT. Amendment to the Master Plan Land Use Element for Block 5002, Lot Township of Teaneck, Bergen County, New Jersey.

Crenshaw/LAX Transit Project Joint Development Fairview Heights Community Workshop #2 April 30, 2016

DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount

Chapter URBAN VILLAGE ZONING DISTRICTS

Jefferson County. Case RZ. Presenter: Alan Tiefenbach. Planning and Zoning Division

Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APRIL 21, 2016

COMPLETE NEIGHBORHOODS AND HOUSING. Community Summit 02 February, 2012

Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

Auburn Avenue Corridor

Missing Middle Housing Types Showcasing examples in Springfield, Oregon

MEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres

City Avenue District Rezoning

2.7 R-6: High Density Residential District

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

SAMOA MASTER PLAN PROJECT DESCRIPTION (8-4-05)

Ann Arbor Downtown Zoning Evaluation

COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE zones COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES. Zoning By-law PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DIVISION

4. General Land Use and Urban Design Policies

Direct Control District No. 1 (DCD1) for The South Downtown

RM-11 and RM-11N Districts Schedule

SPECIALIZED RESIDENTIAL APARTMENT (R.4) ZONES

City Avenue District Rezoning

DENSITY BONUS ZONING & PUBLIC BENEFITS

Report to: Development Services Committee Report Date: April 21, 2015

FOR SALE BRYANT MOTORS 1300 BRONSON WAY N., RENTON, WA PROPERTY FEATURES: PRIME DEVELOPMENT OR OWNER/USER OPPORTUNITY IN RENTON

Project Team. Community Workshop Draft Specific Plan Review West Anaheim Youth Center September 4, /6/2018.

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013

COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY

APPENDIX A PART 1: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS

5.1 Site Planning & Building Form

A Building Area: 489,616 gross SF apartments, with 214,768 SF garage

PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

Bridgeland-Riverside Area Redevelopment Plan (ARP)

PLANNING COMMISSION WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA WORK SESSION AGENDA Wednesday, May 23, 2012

COMO LAKE AVE. LAND ASSEMBLY

RM-10 and RM-10N Districts Schedule

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE OFFICE BUILDINGS / SPORTS PROJECT WITHIN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AREA NO.

CITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP

Self-Guided Walking Tours Ground-oriented Housing Types. Mt. Pleasant Tour Cambie Corridor Phase 3

H5. Residential Mixed Housing Urban Zone

Part 4.0 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

Grand Pacific Center 400 E Broadway Ave. - 6th Floor - Bismarck, ND 14,700 $16.75 psf

Faribault Place 3 rd Addition Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, & PUD

West End. FOR SALE Executive Summary. Urban Infill Mixed Use Development Opportunity. 879 & 889 Ralph D. Abernathy Blvd.

Truax Park Apartments

CONCEPTUAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLAN PROPOSED CONCEPTUAL PLAN

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

Request Conditional Rezoning (B-2 Community Business to Conditional A-24 Apartment) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Ashby Moss

5. Housing. Other Relevant Policies & Bylaws. Several City-wide policies guide our priorities for housing diversity at the neighbourhood level: Goals

a. South of Sherman Hill b. Gateway West

Section 1. Appendix A, "Zoning" of the Code of the City of Charlotte is hereby amended as follows:

Sub-District C: Washington Park Cultural District

SECTION CLASSIFICATION OF ZONES For the purpose of this Code the following primary land use zoning districts are hereby established:

DeKalb County Zoning Code Update: Hits, near Hits, and Misses

REVISED NOTICE OF APPLICATION & NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING BEFORE THE PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE for OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT

Waterfront Project Summary ATTACHMENT 3

2.0 LAND USE FRAMEWORK

Technology Park Planned Unit Development Technology Park PUD-IP

What is a Neighbourhood Plan?

1. Cuyler-Brownsville planned neighborhood conservation (P-N-C) districtphase I (section ). (2) Single-family semiattached dwellings;

1999 Town Center West Proposal

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

PUBLIC HEARINGS. Variance Ness Avenue (St. Charles Ward) File DAV /2018C [c/r DCU /2018C]

RECOMMENDATIONS OVERVIEWS. Overall Neighborhood Design

City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File:

PLANNING AND REGULATING HOUSING OPTIONS FOR CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS

Honorable Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item

SPECIALIZED COMMERCIAL RESIDENTIAL (CR) ZONES

GLORIOUS PERIOD FARMHOUSE, SEPARATE VACANT COTTAGE, ANNEXE & BARNS. hall farm house gonalston, nottinghamshire

2. Rezone a portion of the lot from R2 (Small Lot Residential) to RD2 (Duplex: Housing Lane).

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

Wheaton Sector Plan. Preliminary. Recommendations. Montgomery County Planning Board

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT BENDER URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY EXPANSION AND ANNEXATION REQUEST April 3, Background

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

355 King St W and 119 Blue Jays Way - OPA & Rezoning Applications - Preliminary Report

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

900 BURRARD STREET CD-1 GUIDELINES (BY-LAW NO. 6421) (CD-1 NO. 229) CONTENTS. 1 Application and Intent... 1

The summary of zoning regulations for each site is provided in the same order (and using the same names for each site) as the RFEI.

Transcription:

ASSIGNMENT 4: URBAN DESIGN AND HOUSING DESIGN Mt. Auburn Vision Statement: To build a vital neighborhood identity for a self sustaining community through the use of existing resources. Intervention Intentions 1. GOAL: Revitalize the Mt. Auburn community through an influx of students from U.C. Objective: To link Mt. Auburn to campus through a series of pedestrian experiences. Objective: Break the stigma of Vine street by creating a more livable and walkable neighborhood environment. Objective: Draw students through magnet functions located within Mt. Auburn Objective: Provide student housing 2. GOAL: Create an identity for Mt. Auburn Objective: provide public gathering places Objective: Establish a more urbanized system of spaces Objective: Preserve the local culture, heritage and historic character of Mt. Auburn Objective: provide entertainment and attractions for residents Objective: provide clear pedestrian connectivity throughout Mt. Auburn giving residents better access to amenities. Objective: Identify park system as a vital part of Mt. Auburn living and identity. 3. GOAL: define park character Objective: determine clear boundaries Objective: put eyes on the park Objective: programmatic designation of park space 4. GOAL: Provide improved living environment for families within Mt. Auburn

Objective: provide support facilities for family living such as schools, day care centers, children s play facility, and easy access to health facilities. Objective: Increase housing stock for a variety of demographic profiles Objective: Integrate character of new building with existing neighborhood Objective: improving safety in park facilities.

Inwood Place : Inwood Park, Inwood on Vine, Inwood Commons & Inwood Village. Inwood Park Proposed Land Use: Recreation, Entertainment and Residential Quantities: Residential units: Number of units: 32 Unit types: single family attached/ row house Non-residential units: Types: Amphitheatre (seating 150), pond with skating rink, half football field, basketball and tennis courts, plaza with fountain jets. Parking: Residential: 32 integrated within units Amphitheatre: on street parking Park Recreation: shared with elementary school Photos: Existing Site Conditions Proposed Site Conditions

Analysis: Existing use: Park is accessed via cul-de-sac from off Auburn ave. Park recreational uses include pond, swimming pool, vacant building, play ground, basketball court, trail network. A small convenience store sits on the south west corner of the park. Development restrictions: Zoning restrictions: All park area is zoned single family residential. The area east of the park and north of Wellington is zoned office and the area east of the park and south of Wellington is zoned multi family residential. Our scheme conforms to the residential land use indicated south of Wellington. However it does not conform along our proposed street west of Wellington, which is currently zoned office and single family but will need to be rezoned to multifamily residential. Setbacks, Height, & Density conformance: This proposal area will be multi family rowhouse which allows maximum height of 35ft, a front setback of 20ft, for lot sizes of 2,500sft. Mt. Auburn community plan conformance: The MCP designates the area south of Inwood st. up to Leroy st. as high density residential, and the area north of Inwood st. as business. The remainder is designated as park space. Our scheme develops housing along a proposed street connecting Hollister st. to Valroy st overlooking the park. Some of this housing does conform with the high density residential designation of the plan. The remainder sits within the boundaries of park designations. Uptown Parks Plan conformance: The parks plan has also proposed a through street from Wellington to Mc.Millan ave, part of which we conform with. However we do not propose extending this street up to Mc. Millan and we will extend south to Valroy. The parks plan also incorporates multifamily residential on the east side of this street. Our plan conforms to this proposal. We will propose more units south of Wellington in addition to the parks plan. Our scheme also proposes an outdoor amphitheatre in the park which does not conform with the parks plan.

Inwood on Vine : Location: West of Vine facing the upper west section of Inwood Park Proposed Land Use: Mixed use residential with retail/commercial at street level and parking in pockets behind the buildings Quantities: Residential units: Number of units: 36 Unit types: multi-family apartments within long street facing blocks Non-residential units: Types: deli/convenience store, specialty shops, bars and cafes, salon, Number of units: 10 Parking: Total 70 / 10,500 sft 36 Residential 20 shops 14 restaurant Photos: Existing Site Conditions Proposed Site Conditions Analysis: Existing use: Scattered buildings line the street: some contain multi family residential, some are vacant and there is one convenience store. Development restrictions:

Zoning restrictions: This section off vine is zoned multi-family residential. Our scheme, proposing mixed use residential and commercial, does not conform with these regulations. Setbacks, Height, & Density conformance: This proposal area will be mixed commercial and multi family residential which allows maximum height of 35ft, a front setback of 20ft, for lot sizes of 2,500sft to 7,500sft. Mt. Auburn community plan conformance: The MCP designates this section off Vine st. as residential high density. Our mixed use scheme does not conform as a result of the commercial use at street level. Uptown Parks Plan Conformance: The plan proposes infill multi family residential west of Vine street south of the pond in Inwood Park. Our scheme proposes similar infill which will be mixed use rather than residential. The north west side of Vine, directly opposite the pond is proposed to be left untouched due to steep topography. Our scheme proposes that the mixed use buildings be integrated into the hillside with the topography to put eyes on the park, develop the critical node at Vine and Hollister, and to define the edge of the park.

Inwood Commons Location: At the interior of the area bounded by McMillan st., Vine st., Hollister st. and Auburn Avenue Proposed Land Use: High density residential for students with integrated parking at street level Quantities: Residential units: Number of units: 112 Unit types: multi family apartment/ row house Parking: Some integrated within buildings and the remainder located in lots behind the buildings Photos: Existing Site Conditions Proposed Site Conditions Analysis: Existing use: Tennis courts sit in the interior behind the street buildings and the bank on McMillan has its parking lot in this space. Development restrictions: Zoning restrictions: The interior of the area bounded by McMillan st., Vine st., Hollister st. and Auburn Avenue are zoned single family residential and the strips along McMillan st., Hollister st. and Auburn Avenue are zoned office. Our scheme does not conform with either of these designations. It proposes multi family residential. The south west corner of this plot will be commercial / public use.

Setbacks, Height, & Density conformance: This proposal area will largely be multi family residential which allows maximum height of 35ft, a front setback of 20ft, for lot sizes of 2,500sft. The south west corner with commercial will front onto both Vine and Hollister. The height requirement for this building will be between 50 and 85ft depending on our future proposed use. Mt. Auburn community plan conformance: The MCP designates the strip along McMillan as Neighborhood Business District/Major Focus Area. It designates the area east of the tennis courts and on the built strip of Hollister st. as business clusters Uptown Parks Plan Conformance: The parks plan proposes parking in the south west corner of the plot where we propose a commercial and public use. The plan proposes a park in the center where we propose multi family residential on the north and south sides of the court. Their proposal had multi family residential on the east side of the through street connecting McMillan and Wellington. Our scheme proposes an extension of the central court with housing on the outside and parking behind.

Auburn Entertainment District Location: North and South of Hollister st. except for Inwood Park Proposed Land Use: Conversion of some of the existing houses on Hollister ave. to artist s studios, galleries, cafes and bars Quantities: Residential units: Number of units: 9 Unit types: as existing Non-residential units: Types: Artist s studios, galleries, specialty shops, florist, book shop, giftshops, organic food stores, restaurants, cafes and bars Number of units: 10 in total Number of parking units: 30 Photos: Existing Site Conditions Proposed Site Conditions Analysis: Existing use: Single family residential Development restrictions:

Zoning restrictions: The north and south strips of Hollister avenue under consideration are zoned office. Under our scheme these areas would be re-zoned to commercial. This area would slowly phase out office use and will be replaced by the functions proposed. Setbacks, Height, & Density conformance: This commercial street will maintain current setbacks and heights (as single family homes) to maintain the historic character of the street. Any new construction would conform to this standard. Mt. Auburn community plan conformance: The MCP designates the area under consideration as business clusters. Our scheme with existing residential and proposed commercial/institutional does not conform to the suggested land use. Uptown Parks Plan conformance: The parks plan does not propose any alterations to this street from the existing conditions.

Inwood Village Extension: Location: Single family rowhouses in strips along vacant property between existing buildings on Glencoe st., Inwood st., and Leroy st. Proposed Land Use: High and medium density residential Quantities: Residential units: Number of units: 40 rowhousing units Unit types: Single family rowhouses Number of Parking units: 40 Photos: Existing Site Conditions Proposed Site Conditions Analysis: Existing use: single family residential, open space, and vacant lots Development restrictions: Zoning restrictions: Zoning designates this area as multi family residential. Our scheme conforms to the zoning restrictions. Setbacks, Height, & Density conformance: This proposal area will be multi family rowhouse which allows maximum height of 35ft, a front setback of 20ft, for lot sizes of 2,500sft. Mt. Auburn community plan conformance: The MCP designates this area as high density residential. Our scheme conforms to this designation. Uptown Parks Plan conformance: The parks plan proposes single family residential units backed by open space. Our scheme proposes multi family residential backed by alternated parking and green space.