Contractual Allocation of Environmental Risk in Transactions: Case Law Developments Under CERCLA

Similar documents
New Phase I Requirements for Real Estate Transactions: Implications of the New All Appropriate Inquiries Rule

Trends in M&A Provisions: Sandbagging and Anti-Sandbagging Provisions

Chapter XII BROWNFIELDS & BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS. A. Business Transactions

Relation Back of Exercise of Option Are There Exceptions? By John C. Murray i

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

Present: Carrico, C.J., Compton, Stephenson, Lacy, Keenan, and Koontz, JJ., and Whiting, Senior Justice

Aaron Leaf, J.D. Candidate 2017

BUY/SELL AGREEMENT. 4. Possession will be given to Buyer at closing. Exceptions: Subject to tenant s rights.

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

INNOPHOS, INC. ( SELLER ) GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE

LLC Operating Agreements in Bankruptcy: Are They Executory?

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. This case arises from a real estate deal gone sour. In June 2008, Plaintiff JLB Realty,

MERGERS ACQUISITIONS! C onsider this: you have worked for years to build a BNA, LAW REPORT. Earn-Outs: Bridge the Gap, With Caution INC.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LIFTING STAY. Fox 716 Realty LLC ( Landlord ), the landlord and a creditor of Sweet N Sour

TACKLING ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IN NORTH CAROLINA. Presented by The Cambridge Institute

Executory Contracts. Evelyn H. Biery Fulbright & Jaworski LLP Houston, Texas

TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE

2013 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

ALI-ABA Course of Study Modern Real Estate Transactions August 13-15, 2009 Santa Fe, New Mexico

Preparing for Negotiations: The Environmental Lawyer s Checklist In Oil and Gas Transactions

The New Bulk Sales Notification Requirements and Their Application to New Jersey Real Estate Transactions - Part II

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM v. CASE NO. 5D

TOKEN SALE AGREEMENT TERMS AND CONDITIONS

CONTENTS. (1995 ed)... Jean M. DeFond (2003 supp)... John C. Watkinson Abigail A. Klinect 3 Easements

Rappaport v. Banfield, No Wncv (Katz, J., July 14, 2005)

SYLLABUS. Law REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS AND LITIGATION. II. REAL ESTATE BROKERS AND SALES AGENTS (August 27; September 3)

Terms and Conditions of Sales

Whether a rent-to-own (RTO) contract for a consumer good is a true lease or a conditional sales contract for Federal income tax purposes.

Supreme Court of Florida

Case 3:10-cv MO Document 123 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 9 Page ID#: 1439

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2009

Preparing for the Sale or Purchase

10 PITFALLS TO AVOID IN PRE LITIGATION DISPUTES

ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2009

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

"AS IS" IN A CONTAMINATED WORLD. WILLIAM H. LOCKE, JR. HELEN CURRIE FOSTER Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody Austin, Texas

FILED IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE AFFIRMED AND REMANDED

BUILDER S ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (Use with NWMLA Form 21)

Real estate project costs

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT. v. Case No. 5D

ALI-ABA Course of Study Modern Real Estate Transactions July 30 - August 2, 2008 Boston, Massachusetts. Primer of Remedies for Landlord Defaults

Dealing with Financial Distress: Strategies for Acquiring Distressed Assets and Protecting Contractual Relationships

EXAM SPECIFICATIONS FOR REAL ESTATE LAW

Terms & Conditions of Sale:

Borowski v. STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, Wis: Court of Appeals, 1st...

Referral Partnership Program

IN RE COPELAND 238 B.R. 801 (Bankr. E.D. Ark. 1999)

Liquidated Damages under The Florida Residential Landlord and Tenant Act. Background

THESE FORMS ARE NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR LEGAL ADVICE.

Security over Collateral. USA - NEBRASKA Baird Holm LLP

How to Avoid Environmental Liability in Business Transactions

OFFER TO PURCHASE REAL ESTATE

F L, E D MAR ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA. No

DISPATCHES FROM THE TRENCHES

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Broker improperly files lis pendens for recovery of commission

WHRL SOLUTIONS LLC. CONDITIONS AND TERMS OF SALE 1. APPLICABLE TERMS.

SELLER WARRANTIES AND DUE DILIGENCE IN THE PURCHASE OF COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE. ALAN WAYTE Dewey Ballantine LLP Los Angeles

Title Example. Cure of Title Defect and Tender. When Tender Is Excused: Review. Closing and Tender

DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS AND HOME INSPECTION

Broker Liability. By William C. Wagner

What you need to know Real Estate Education Series

Case 6:18-cv CJS Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Question Under what theory or theories may Paula be successful in her breach of contract action against Bert? Discuss.

Oil and gas leases typically contain a habendum clause

Chapter 13 Questions Title Records

RECENT TRENDS AND LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS IN M&A AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Buy and Sell Agreement

Business & Contract Law. Week 5. Law, 5ed., 2017, Prof. Dr. P. Zamaros

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT January Term 2005

VALUATION OF PROPERTY. property. REALTORS need to keep in mind first, that the Occupational Code limits what

LIST OF CHAPTERS. Chapter 2 MECHANICS OF A QUIET TITLE ACTION QUIET TITLE ACTIONS AGAINST THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

COMMERCIAL LEASES IN BANKRUPTCY. John M. August. Upon the filing of a petition pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. 101,

Real Estate Records. and what they are

CHAPTER 14 REAL PROPERTY PRACTICE

CASH SALE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION SENATE DRS35055-LTz-20A* (2/14)

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Appellees, : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 02 CV 1606

RESIDENTIAL RESALE CONDOMINIUM PROPERTY PURCHASE CONTRACT

The Evolving Analysis of IP Licenses in M&A Transactions

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/29/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 99 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/29/2018

WICO UCTIONS. REAL ESTATE AUCTION TERMS AND CONDITIONS. Thank you for attending today s auction. Good luck!

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 229

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

BILL OF SALE. BILL OF SALE No. ######### COVER PAGE

Attendees of the 31 st Annual NARO Convention, Long Beach, California, October 20-22, 2011

OWN A PIECE OF HISTORY

DISPOSSESSORY AND DISTRESS WARRANTS. by Scott I. Zucker, Esq. Weissmann & Zucker, P.C.

CONTRACT FOR SALE OF REAL ESTATE

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

RESIDENTIAL PURCHASE CONTRACT

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2007

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SALE FOR MARINE FUEL

EPA Issues Guidance On New CERCLA Landowner Defenses

Bank Not Entitled To Attorney's Fees In Pursuing Borrower For Waste

Transcription:

1037 Twenty First Annual Advanced ALI-ABA Course of Study The Impact of Environmental Law on Real Estate Transactions: Brownfields and Beyond October 2-3, 2008 Boston, Massachusetts Contractual Allocation of Environmental Risk in Transactions: Case Law Developments Under CERCLA By David B. Farer Farer Fersko, P.A. Westfield, New Jersey Copyright 2008 David B. Farer. The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Abigail M. Jones and Maureen Benson in the update and preparation of these materials.

1038 2

1039 CONTRACTUAL ALLOCATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RISK IN TRANSACTIONS: CASE LAW DEVELOPMENTS UNDER CERCLA David B. Farer, Esq.* Farer Fersko Westfield, New Jersey Updated to August 2008 I. Case Law as to Caveat Emptor: 1. Mardan Corp. v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd., 600 F. Supp. 1049 (D.Ariz. 1984), aff'd, 804 F.2d 1454 (9th Cir. 1986). "As is" clause only precludes breach of warranty action. 2. Sunnen Prod. Co. v. Chemtech Indus., Inc., 658 F. Supp. 276 (E.D.Mo. 1987). Party which owned property at time of release cannot shift liability to purchaser by claiming caveat emptor. 3. Smith Land & Improvement Co. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86 (3d Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029 (1989). Doctrine of caveat emptor is not a defense to CERCLA claims and cannot be invoked to transfer liability to purchaser. 4. Southland Corp. v. Ashland Oil, Inc., 696 F. Supp. 994 (D.N.J. 1988). Caveat emptor doctrine inapplicable in CERCLA action. "As is" clause inapplicable in action not based on breach of warranty. 5. International Clinical Lab. v. Stevens, 710 F. Supp. 466 (E.D.N.Y. 1989). "As is" clause does not bar CERCLA lawsuit; only precludes breach of warranty action. * Copyright 2008 by David B. Farer. The author gratefully acknowledges the assistance of Abigail M. Jones and Maureen Benson in the update and preparation of these materials. 1

1040 6. Allied Corp. v. Frola, 730 F. Supp. 626 (D.N.J. 1990) "As is" clause precludes action for breach of implied representations as to condition of property, but does not preclude either CERCLA or New Jersey common law claims, which cannot be precluded by contract unless buyer knowingly accepts responsibility. 7. Westwood Pharm., Inc. v. National Fuel Gas Distrib. Corp., 737 F. Supp. 1272 (W.D.N.Y. 1990), aff'd on reconsideration, 767 F. Supp. 456 (W.D.N.Y. 1991), aff'd, 964 F.2d 85 (2d Cir. 1992). In rejecting caveat emptor argument, court notes that it is difficult to imagine how buyer could have bargained away CERCLA liability eight years before the statute was passed. 8. Alcan-Toyo America v. Northern Ill. Gas Co., 881 F. Supp 342 (N.D.Ill. 1995). Court considers doctrine of caveat emptor as one element to be considered in equitable allocation, and concludes that buyer should bear "some" responsibility for response costs. 9. New West Urban Renewal Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp., 909 F. Supp. 219 (D.N.J. 1995). In 1983 real estate transaction between two sophisticated entities, "as is" clause found insufficient to contractually allocate CERCLA liability. See case 89 below, under "Case Law as to Contract," for decision on subsequent litigation. 10. M & M Realty Company v. Eberton Terminal Corporation, 977 F. Supp. 683 (M.D.Pa. 1997). 1994 sale agreement includes "Environmental Contingency" clause providing that buyer's obligation to purchase is subject to buyer's satisfaction with its own environmental audit, and specifying that if buyer closes it accepts the property "as is," based on its own investigation, with no reliance on any statements or representations by seller. Seller argues that the clause allocated all environmental liability to the buyer. 2

1041 Finding no Pennsylvania law considering the effect of an "as is" provision on CERCLA liability, court follows majority of federal courts in determining that the clause does not bar buyer's CERCLA claims, but does bar buyer's claims of breach of warranty, fraud, and implied warranty of good faith and fair dealing. 11. Foster v. U.S., 130 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2001). A buyer's 1985 acquisition of property in "as is" condition was not tantamount to assumption of risk for contaminants of which buyer had no knowledge. Nor did "as is" clause inure to the benefit of a non-party to the 1985 transaction, who was not an intended third party beneficiary of the terms of the deal. 12. New York v. Westwood-Squibb Pharmaceutical, 2004 WL 1570261 (W.D.N.Y. May 25, 2004). Non-jury trial proceeds on litigation that was the subject of the Westwood Pharmaceutical case (see case 7 above), and court renders findings of fact on allocation. Court finds no compelling reason to shift any portion of the responsibility for the cleanup from the polluter-seller to the buyer under the doctrine of caveat emptor. Considering all facts and circumstances, court finds it fair and equitable for polluter to bear 90% of past and future costs, and for the buyer to bear the remaining 10%. 13. XDP, Inc v. Watmull Properties Corp., 2004 WL 1103023 (D. Or. May 16, 2004). In multi-party dispute over cleanup of historical contamination at manufacturing site, a former owner-operator seeks summary judgment against the buyer on issues of defense and indemnity based on a 1989 agreement. Agreement was in lieu of foreclosure that settled claims of the buyer on a series of defaulted loans previously made by the seller. As part of the agreement, the seller was released from further liability on the loans in exchange for the transfer of assets, including the property that is the subject of the contamination dispute. 3