Brant County O.P.P. Detachment Committee Report

Similar documents
2 REVISED NOBLETON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CHARGE OPTIONS AND PREPAID DEVELOPMENT CHARGE CREDIT AGREEMENT PRINCIPLES TOWNSHIP OF KING

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in Policy and Finance Committee Report 7, which was considered by City Council on July 19, 20, 21 and 26, 2005.

DEVELOPMENT CHARGE BYLAW

COUNTY OF BRANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT. Chair and Members of the Committee of Adjustment

TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 849, WATER AND SEWAGE SERVICES AND UTILITY BILL. Chapter 849 WATER AND SEWAGE SERVICES AND UTILITY BILL 1

3660 Kingston Road New Lease for Toronto Employment & Social Services Office. Government Management Committee

CITY CLERK. (City Council at its Special Meeting held on July 30, 31 and August 1, 2002, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

BYLAW a) To impose and provide for the payment of Off-site development levies;

SPECIAL GENERAL COMMITTEE AGENDA Tuesday, February 27, 2018 Immediately following the General Committee Meeting Town Council Chambers Page 1

COUNTY OF BRANT DEVELOPMENT CHARGE BACKGROUND STUDY AND PROPOSED BY-LAW

Construction. Required Documentation From Owner/Developer

TANGIBLE CAPITAL ASSETS

CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF LEEDS AND THE THOUSAND ISLANDS BY-LAW

Results of the Request for Proposals to Develop and Operate Affordable Rental Housing at 200 Madison Avenue

Addendum to: Town of Bradford West Gwillimbury Development Charge Background Study for Water, Wastewater, and Road Services

By-law C.P Guide to Development Charges

Moorhead,, Minnesota

City of Barrie Development Charge Background Study

TOWN OF PELHAM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE BACKGROUND STUDY OFFICE CONSOLIDATION NOVEMBER 4, (As Amended March 5 th and April 28 th, 2014)

REPORT. Mayor Bonnette and Members of Council. Adam Farr, Manager of Development Review Water Allocation Georgetown Urban Area

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

Implementing the Housing Now Initiative

Saskatchewan Municipal Financing Tools

2019 Development Charges By-law Update Project Plan

Town of Grimsby Development Charge Background Study

2016 Development Cost Charges Bylaw Update

Tangible Capital Assets Implementation of Section 3150 New Brunswick Local Governments. October 2010

Staff Report. October 19, 2016 Page 1 of 17. Meeting Date: October 19, 2016

Government Management Committee. P:\2011\Internal Services\Fac\Gm11008Fac- (AFS 10838)

CITY CLERK. Provincial Policy for Secondary Uses in Hydro Corridors

Shawnee Landing TIF Project. City of Shawnee, Kansas. Need For Assistance Analysis

Robert Armstrong, Director, Development & Environmental Services

Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake Development Charges Background Study

Town of Lincoln Development Charges Background Study

CITY OF HAMILTON. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Economic Development Division

DRAFT REPORT. Boudreau Developments Ltd. Hole s Site - The Botanica: Fiscal Impact Analysis. December 18, 2012

TOWN OF LINCOLN COUNCIL POLICY

enter into land leases; 2. donate land; or 3. provide land at below market value.

EHLANZENI DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY ACCOUNTING POLICIES TO THE ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF GUELPH. WHEREAS the City of Guelph will experience growth through development and redevelopment;

7 CONDITIONAL GRANTS EQUAL TO DEVELOPMENT CHARGES FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

The Honourable Peter Milczyn Minister of Housing/Minister Responsible for the Poverty Reduction Strategy College Park, 17th Floor

DATE: May 6, 2013 REPORT NO. CD Gregory Dworak, General Manager, Community Services

Land and Easement Donation Process and Requirements Summary

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

INVENTORY POLICY For Real Property

THAT Council receives for information the Report from the Planner II dated April 25, 2016 with respect to the annual Housing Report update.

NORTHWEST TERRITORIES HOUSING CORPORATION

Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development Commercial Space Underwriting Guidelines

Community & Infrastructure Services Committee

Grinder Pump & Greywater Systems Policy May 2016

3. PRESENTATIONS/DELEGATIONS (list, if any, available at meeting) Brant & Brantford Local Housing Corporation Board of Directors May 4, 2016

Administration and Calculation of Servicing Agreement Fees and Development Levies

The Corporation of the City of Kawartha Lakes Committee of the Whole Report

City Council Draft 08/15/03

1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE CIP VISION LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Municipal Act Planning Act...

Order No. 152/18. RURAL MUNICIPALITY OF LA BROQUERIE LA BROQUERIE WASTEWATER UTILITY REVISED RATES FOR JANUARY 1, 2019, 2020, and 2021

REPORT Peel Living. ~ecember 16,2010 REPORT TITLE: TWIN PINES REVIEW FROM: Mwarigha MS., General Manager, Peel Living RECOIMIMENDATION

DATE: December 8, 2014 REPORT NO. PHSSS Housing Development Coordinator 1.0 TYPE OF REPORT CONSENT ITEM [ ] ITEM FOR CONSIDERATION [ X ]

TOWN OF SIDNEY BYLAW NO A BYLAW OF THE MUNICIPALITY TO IMPOSE DEVELOPMENT COST CHARGES.

Appendix 'A' Bill No. By-law No

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NORTH FRONTENAC BY-LAW #123-13

TOWN OF RICHMOND HILL DEVELOPMENT CHARGE BACKGROUND STUDY

Mayor and Members of Council. Storey Samways Planning Ltd. DATE: March 8, SUBJECT: Planning Services Report

Orange Water and Sewer Authority Water and Sewer System Development Fee Study

ORIGINAL PRONOUNCEMENTS

Standing Committee on City Finance and Services

REPORTING TREATMENT OF SOCIAL HOUSING FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES IN THE FINANCIAL INFORMATION RETURN (FIR)

REQUEST FOR DECISION Zoning Bylaw No. 670, 1999, Amendment Bylaw No

City of Brandon Development Charges FAQs

BYLAW 5781 ****************

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

Members of the City of Brantford Committee of Adjustment. 1.0 TYPE OF REPORT Committee of Adjustment Decision Regarding an Application for Consent

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MEETING AUGUST 21, 2017 REQUEST FOR CONNECTION TO THE MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY FOR GREEN BRIAR AND BRIAR HILL

ADDENDUM TO: TOWN OF ORANGEVILLE 2014 DEVELOPMENT CHARGES BACKGROUND STUDY

Municipality of Bluewater Development Charge Background Study

Cheakamus Crossing Expansion

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF DURHAM SEATON WATER SUPPLY AND SANITARY SEWERAGE SERVICE AREA SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT CHARGE INFORMATION

Bill 7, Promoting Affordable Housing Act, 2016

Implementing the Open Door Affordable Housing Program

1.0 General Information Municipal Address: Assessment Roll No. Concession: Registered Plan No.

TITLE 5 MUNICIPAL FINANCE AND TAXATION 1 CHAPTER 1 MISCELLANEOUS

SITE PLAN CONTROL GUIDE

Accounting for Tangible Capital Assets

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES REPORT B

Planning Advisory Committee Meeting Agenda

REPORT. Economic Development Committee. Tara Buonpensiero, Senior Planner - Policy

TOWNSHIP OF SOUTHGATE ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN ROADS, BRIDGES, STORM, FACILITIES, WATER AND WASTEWATER ASSETS. In association with:

Impact Fees. Section 1 Purpose and Intent.

1.3. The Policy is based on the City of London governing principles:

The Corporation of the City of Kawartha Lakes. Amended Agenda. Planning Advisory Committee Meeting

CHARTER OF THE TOWN OF HANOVER, N.H.

Kane County. Division of Transportation. Technical Specifications Manual for Road Improvement Impact Fees Under Kane County Ordinance #07-232

Discover the world SEPTEMBER 13, International Accounting Standards Board First Floor 30 Cannon Street London, United Kingdom EC4M 6XH

Subject. Date: January 12, Chair and Members of Planning and Development Committee 2016/02/01

RÉGION D OTTAWA-CARLETON

A Guide to Establishing Additional Service Areas in Rural Municipalities

Transcription:

To: From: Date: June 7, 2016 Subject: Purpose: Brant County O.P.P. Detachment Committee Report To the Chair and Members of the Brant County O.P.P Detachment Committee Robin Hewitt, General Manager of Corporate Services DET-16-03 O.P.P. Detachment Options For approval Recommendation That the County of Brant proceed with Option 2 ( a Base ing of the O.P.P. Detachment) on the lands previously purchased by the County, at the north-east corner of Bethel Road and Rest Acres Road and have the Province undertake the leasehold improvements at their expense; That the O.P.P. Detachment Committee be directed to submit a proposal to Infrastructure Ontario outlining the said proposal for approval; And that staff work with the O.P.P. and Infrastructure Ontario to issue a Request for Proposals for a design of the facility capable of housing the O.P.P. Detachment that fully meets the requirements of the O.P.P. and preparation of the construction RFP documents. Key Strategic Priority 4.2 To ensure our community is healthy, safe and progressive. Financial Considerations Financial analyses of the options discussed in this report are included in Appendix 1. Background On May 16, 2016 the O.P.P. Detachment Committee met to discuss the various options for the new detachment. The meeting resulted in the request for additional analyses, including costs for site servicing, lease estimates and debt financing projections. As a result, a more detailed analysis is being provided by way of this report. The analysis includes specific costs and revenues for the three options: 1. County (Turnkey) 2. Shared 3. Provincial/O.P.P. Donation of land by County

Report There are numerous variables that effect the financial implications of each option. Not all costs and revenues can be determined with certainty at this point, therefore some numbers are based on staff projections. Mechanic Street The financial implications for all three options are effected by the decision on whether or not to sell the existing O.P.P. Station located on Mechanic Street in Paris. Selling the Mechanic Street location would reduce the amount of financing required and create revenue through assessment and taxation. Retaining Mechanic Street and renting it out, based on current local comparable rental rates, would create rental income. All of these factors are included in the attached analysis. Site Servicing Site servicing, which is the responsibility of the County in all three options, is cause for concern because currently there are no services that extend that far down Rest Acres Road. In 2015, GM Blueplan Engineering did a servicing concepts exercise for the TCA lands in anticipation of developing the business park. Based on this exercise, it has been determined that extension of the municipal water supply to the site from the Bethel Water Treatment Plant could be done by directionally boring a 300 mm water service line. This line would further be adequate to service the remainder of the TCA site at some future time. The alternate to this option would be to install a deep well, fire pump and above ground storage tank for fire flows. Although specific costs for this option are not known at this time, it is estimated that the costs to do that would undoubtedly exceed the cost of providing the water service line. The installation of a force main from the southwest corner of the TCA site to the Folsetter Drive sewage pumping station is currently being costed and may become a feasible option in conjunction with the development of the TCA site. In the meantime, the more conservative approach would be to include costs for a septic system as a base assumption. If, down the road, the force main is installed, the option for a septic system can be removed from the project. Storm water management on site should be adequately captured in the existing cost per square foot. It is estimated that these costs would be nominal. Should the development of the TCA lands proceed, storm water could be addressed by connecting it to the storm service. Depending on the timing of the project as compared to the timing of the development of the TCA site, some of the costs may be shifted onto either development charges or the project budget for the TCA lands. Leasing The portion of the new 18,969.87 square foot detachment that can be attributed to the Provincial Policing piece is 27.7%. As a result, the County can collect lease revenue from the O.P.P. The lease rate for the shared build is $20 to $25 per square foot, as provided by Infrastructure Ontario. The lease rate for the County build would be $35 to $40 per square foot for 10 years, to incorporate the costs of the leasehold improvements ($2,845,481). After 10 years, the lease rate would be reduced to market rate (currently $20 to $25 per square foot). Should the Province/O.P.P. build the entire building, the County would be required to DET-16-03 Page 2 of 6

pay a lease for the local O.P.P. share of the building, which is 72.3% of 18,969.87 square feet. Although not confirmed at the time of writing this report, it is assumed the rate would be market rate, with a reduction attributable to the land donation. Financing For the purpose of this report, financing rates were obtained from Infrastructure Ontario and all estimates were based on the current days rate (May 18, 2016) which was 3.29%. The amortization period used for the calculations was 25 years. The amount to be financed was offset by $320,000 in development charges that have been collected. Interdepartmental Considerations Attachments 1. Appendix 1 Cost Analysis 2. Appendix 2 Proposed O.P.P. Detachment Concept Location of building on the site Copy to File # DET-16-03 In adopting this report, is a bylaw or agreement required? If so, it should be referenced in the recommendation section. By-law required (No) Agreement(s) or other documents to be signed by Mayor and /or Clerk (No) Is the necessary by-law or agreement being sent concurrently to Council? (No) DET-16-03 Page 3 of 6

Attachment #1 County Shared OPP County Shared OPP Includes Sale of Mechanic St. Does not Include Sale of Mechanic St. Project Costs - Capital Expenses Cost of Land (3 of 5 acres) 223,024 223,024 223,024 223,024 223,024 223,024 Base ing 5,235,684 5,235,684-5,235,684 5,235,684 - Leasehold Improvements 2,845,481 - - 2,845,481 - - Municipal Water Supply 221,000 221,000 221,000 221,000 221,000 221,000 Septic System 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Total Project Expenses 8,625,189 5,779,708 544,024 8,625,189 5,779,708 544,024 Revenue Sale - Mechanic Street 820,000 820,000 820,000 - - - Total Project Income 820,000 820,000 820,000 - - - Financing Gross amount to be Financed 7,582,165 4,736,684-8,402,165 5,556,684 321,000 DC's Collected - offset 320,000 320,000 320,000 320,000 320,000 Net to be Financed 7,262,165 4,416,684-8,082,165 5,236,684 1,000 Annual Costs - Operating Expenses Annual Financing 426,520 259,400-474,668 307,560 - Operating costs 125,000 125,000 125,000 * 125,000 125,000 125,000 * Rent Paid to Province - - 284,454 - - 284,454 Total Annual Expenses 551,520 384,400 409,454 599,668 432,560 409,454 Revenue Rent Recovered from OPP 197,050 118,230-197,050 118,230 - Rent Recovered from Mechanic St. 83,000 83,000 83,000 Future Tax Revenues Mechanic St. 30,375 30,375 30,375 Taxes, maintenance, insurance (15%) 29,557 17,734-29,557 17,734-256,982 166,339 30,375 309,607 218,964 83,000 Net income/(loss) - Annual Financial Impact - 294,538-218,061-379,079-290,061-213,596-326,454 * Actual costs may vary

Key Assumptions Land cost prorated (3 of 5 acres). Total land cost was $371,707.23. Detachment portion is 60% = $223,024 Square footage of proposed detachment: 18,969.87 Provincial share of building: 27.7%, County share of building is 72.3% Base building square footage costs: $276 Leasehold improvements square footage costs: $150 Project financing based on Infrastructure Ontario Amortizer 25 year loan at 3.29% (rate as at May 18, 2016) Annual maintenance costs as determined by staff Lease Rates > Lease rates provided by Infrastructure Ontario > Base building only: $20.00-25.00 per square foot. The amount of $22.50 was used for this analysis > County build: $35.00-40.00 per square foot. The amount of $37.50 was used for this analysis. The increased rate is to pay for the leasehold improvements and is only payable at that rate for 10 years ($15.00 X 18,969.87 X 10 years = $2,845,481 leasehold cost) > Lease rate for OPP build based on $22.50 per square foot for 72.3% of the building, reduced $1.76 per square foot for recognition of the donation of land Water Servicing > Municipal water supply: Information provided by GM Blueplan Engineering from servicing concepts done for the TCA lands in 2015 Water supply involves boring a 300mm water service line to the site providing all domestic and fire suppression water. It would be adequate to service the remainder of the TCA site at some future time. > The cost to install a deep well, fire pump and above ground storage tank for fire flows would likely exceed the costs bringing in a water service line. > Depending on the timeline, the costs may become DC eligible and we could include the project in the next DC study. Waste Water > The installation of a force main from the S.W. corner of the TCA site to the Folsetter Drive sewage pumping station is currently being costed and may become a feasible option in conjunction with the development of the TCA site. At this point, it would be more prudent to include a septic system until such time as the force main is installed. Storm Water Management >Storm Water Management on site should be adequately captured in the existing cost per square foot as the costs would be nominal. In the event that the TCA lands are developed, storm water could be addressed by connecting it to the storm service. Mechanic Street Sale of 28 and 32 Mechanic Street based on CBRE Valuation, 2012 and may be higher now Future tax revenues based on future assessment of $950,000 Rental rates based on estimate of 8,300 square feet at $10.00 per square foot = $83,000 (based on local market analysis) DET-16-03 Page 5 of 6

Attachment #2 DET-16-03 Page 6 of 6