Billboard Relocation Code Amendments. City Council Transportation and Environment Committee March 23, 2009

Similar documents
ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Chapter 51A, Dallas Development Code: Ordinance No , as

CITY PLAN COMMISSION THURSDAY, JULY 19, 2018 Planner: Vasavi Pilla. FILE NUMBER: DCA DATE INITIATED: December 14, 2017

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #11

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

Oak Cliff Gateway District PD 468

Bulk Requirements (For other supplementary location and bulk regulations, see Article VII.)

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

Please feel free to contact either myself or Kris Sweckard if you have any questions or need additional information.

ITEM NO(S): B.1 B.3 STAFF: SHARON ROBINSON FILE NO(S): CPC CU QUASI-JUDICIAL CPC UV QUASI_JUDICIAL CPC NV QUASI-JUDICIAL

WELCOME! Please start here

DCA Proposed Development Code Amendment to Subdivision Regulations. Division 51A-8.500, Subdivision Layout and Design

ARTICLE 834. PD 834. PD 834 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on December 8, (Ord.

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

City Wide Design Guidelines Attachment A Proposed Ordinance

R-1 ONE-FAMILY DWELLING ZONE

VILLAGE CENTER ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA ADVISORY WORKING GROUP/ PLANNING COMMISSION FOR ORR PARTNERS 01/

ARTICLE 10. NONCONFORMITIES

SECTION SITE SURVEYS

Signs along highways shall meet all of the requirements of the zoning districts in which they are located.

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013

Chapter 1107: Zoning Districts

Proposed Development Code Amendments to Parking Requirements for Certain Uses

ARTICLE 5.0 SCHEDULE OF REGULATIONS

Community Mixed Use Zone Districts (CMU)

ZONING ORDINANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Thursday, April 27, 2017 DALLAS DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT FILE NO. DCA

Town of Siler City - Unified Development Ordinance ARTICLE XII - Density and Dimensional Regulations

ARTICLE 2 GENERAL REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Plats and subdivisions; mapping requirements. (a) Size Requirements. All land plats presented to the register of deeds for recording in the

Plan Area and Current Facilities

ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 9, 2015

ARTICLE 260. PD 260.

Community Development

CHAPTER 154: SIGNS. Section

No sign shall interfere with vehicular or pedestrian safety in any manner.

I. Requirements for All Applications. C D W

ORDINANCE NO

Article 1 UNIVERSITY PARK ZONING DRAFT. LEGEND See inside front cover. August 31, 2018 DRAFT 4.0 ZONING ORDINANCE CITY OF UNIVERSITY PARK

Changing the Paradigm

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

ARTICLE 10 SPECIAL PURPOSE DISTRICTS

HEIGHTS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS PLANNING AND ZONING 101 EDUCATION SESSION

Heights in Residential Zoning Districts Stakeholders Meeting September 17, 2009

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-20 Habitat for Humanity Evans Road Town Council Meeting October 16, 2014

LeBreton Flats Redevelopment Development Summary Chart (First Subdivision)

SECTION 3. Housing. Appendix A LAND USE DEFINITIONS

Presented by: Michael G. Geier, PLS Snyder & Associates, Inc.

Department of Planning & Development Services

Metropolitan Planning Commission. DATE: April 5, 2016

** If your lot does not meet the requirements above, please read Sec below

Section 1. Appendix A, "Zoning" of the Code of the City of Charlotte is hereby amended as follows:

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REVIEW CRITERIA

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #2

Voluntary Inclusionary Zoning

ARTICLE ZONING DISTRICTS AND OFFICIAL MAP SEC SUPPLEMENTAL AREA, YARD AND HEIGHT RESTRICTIONS.

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

DIVISION 1 PURPOSE OF DISTRICTS

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION June 2, A conditional use permit for 2,328 square feet of accessory structures at 4915 Highland Road

Anacortes, WA. 718 commercial ave. FOR lease. 2,320 +/- sf retail space in a 10,820 +/- sf building. Located in historic downtown Anacortes

Article 19: Southeastern San Diego Planned District ( Southeastern San Diego Planned District added by O N.S.)

SUBDIVISION APPLICATION CHECKLIST SKETCH PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT FINAL PLAT

City of Independence

RESOLUTION NO

Sedro woolley, WA 720 MURDOCK ST. FOR sale. 14,500 +/- sf office building with 8,500 +/- sf unfinished basement space on 0.

Draft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance

"ARTICLE - VINE STREET TRANSITIONAL (VST) DISTRICT

CHAPTER 13 SIGNS 13-1

Zoning Project Objectives

Group Sewer Only** 80 Ft Frontage* 20,000 Sq. Ft. (.46 acre) Minimum** 120 Ft Frontage* 20,000 Sq. Ft. (.46acre) Minimum** 150 Ft Frontage*

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION October 1, Setback variances for a detached garage at Linde Lane

Bunker Hill Part II Urban Design. Specific Plan. Case No. CPC SP TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following rules shall apply in the interpretation of district boundaries and the location of centers shown on the zoning map:

Conditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

Combined Zoning/Minor Variance and Boulevard Parking Agreement Exception

Voluntary Inclusionary Zoning

mandatory injunction to remove any previous violation hereof.

ORDINANCE NO

c. Public Facilities: Community Center; Public Park; Religious Use; Transit Stop. [Amended Ordinance #11-07]

East Side Community Meeting

City of Prior Lake APPLICATION FOR COMBINED PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT

C HAPTER 15: N ONCONFORMITIES

30% 10 FT 10 FT A 20 FT A 16 FT 35 FT 35 FT 10 FT A 20 FT A 2 35 FT PERMITTED PERMITTED NOT AN ACCESSORY STRUCTURE MAY NOT EXCEED THE.

APPLICATION OF THIS CHAPTER RELATIONSHIP OF THIS CHAPTER TO STATE LAW... 4

ARTICLE 847. PD 847. PD 847 was established by Ordinance No , passed by the Dallas City Council on April 27, (Ord.

Division Development Impact Review.

ORDINANCE NO. An ordinance amending Section of the Los Angeles municipal Code by amending the zoning map.

E1-12: Final Decision AS

Chapter 12 RMH MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT/ZONE

Cluster Development Princeton Township, Mercer County

CITY OF DALLAS. CITY PLAN COMMISSION Thursday, February 3, 2011 AGENDA. BRIEFINGS: 5ES 12:00 p.m. PUBLIC HEARING Council Chambers 1:30 p.m.

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-24 Indian Wells Road Properties Town Council Meeting November 20, 2014

Oceanside Zoning Ordinance

PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda - Public Hearing Item

Farming & Livestock related activities Y Y Y Y Y Y. Commercial Type Animal Facility Y Y Y

PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT

Chapter 15: Non-Conformities

FRONT YARD MP 35 FT 35 FT 10 FT A 20 FT A 2 35 FT 30% NOT PERMITTED NOT PERMITTED

Please feel free to contact either myself or David Cossum if you have any questions or need additional information.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

Transcription:

Billboard Relocation Code Amendments City Council Transportation and Environment Committee March 23, 2009

PURPOSE Brief the committee on a code amendment to the current provisions allowing the relocation of billboards located on land acquired by a governmental entity Provide additional information specifically on: Relocating billboards that are within 2,000 feet of the Trinity River Maximum sign height for billboards adjacent to expressways The impact of allowing billboards to be relocated to office zoning districts 2

BACKGROUND Section 51A-7.307 permits relocation of billboards located on or overhanging land acquired by a governmental entity subject to certain restrictions. Billboards are often located on land needed for highway expansion projects and rail transit projects. 25 billboards from a single sign company were displaced as a result of construction of the northwest and southeast (Green) DART lines The Transportation and Environment Committee was briefed on May 27, 2008 and instructed staff to bring a proposal forward to modify the existing relocation provisions. 3

BACKGROUND The Zoning Ordinance Advisory Committee considered this issue at three public meetings between October and December of 2008 On December 4, 2008 the Zoning Ordinance Advisory Committee recommended approval On January 8, 2009 the City Plan Commission recommended approval 4

BACKGROUND Transportation and Environment Committee was briefed on the City Plan Commissions recommendation on February 9, 2009 at which time the committee requested additional information on: Relocating billboards that are within 2,000 feet of the Trinity River Maximum sign height for billboards adjacent to expressways The impact of allowing signs to be relocated to office zoning districts 5

Expressway Sign Height Current definition of height for expressway signs The height of an expressway sign may be extended to 50 feet, or to 30 feet above the nearest point on the nearest travel surface of the nearest expressway or new expressway, whichever is higher,, if the total height of the sign does not exceed 60 feet above the ground at the base of the sign Current definition of height for other signs HEIGHT, as applied to a sign, means the vertical distance between the highest part of the sign or its supporting structure, whichever is higher, and a level plane going through the nearest point of the vehicular traffic surface of the adjacent improved public right-of of-way,, other than an alley. In the event a sign is equidistant from more than one improved public right-of of-way, none of which are alleys, the highest point shall be used 6

Expressway Sign Height CPC Proposed A relocated sign may not exceed an overall height of 42.5 feet measured from the highest point of the sign to the grade level of the centerline of the nearest travel lane, not including ramps, closest to the sign, at a point perpendicular to the sign location, except that in no instance may a relocated sign exceed 80 feet measured from ground level. 7

Expressway Sign Height 8

Expressway Sign Height 9

Expressway Sign Height Current Height Allowed 50 ft 42 ft 26 ft 10

Expressway Sign Height 60 ft Max Current Height Allowed 30 ft 56 ft 26 ft 11

Expressway Sign Height 80 ft Max Height Under Proposal Current Height Allowed 42 ft 60 ft 68 ft 26 ft 12

Expressway Sign Height Proposed Max Height Current Height Allowed 42 ft 80 ft 60 ft 38 ft 13

Expressway Sign Height Proposed The height of a relocated expressway sign may not exceed an overall height of 50 feet, or 30 42.5 feet above the nearest point on the nearest travel surface of the nearest expressway, whichever is higher, if the total height of the sign does not exceed 60 80 feet above the ground at the base of the sign. 14

Expressway Sign Relocation to Office Districts Existing Signs may not be relocated within 300 feet of a non-business zoning district. A Specific Use Permit may authorize lesser spacing. Proposed Expressway Signs may not be relocated within 300 feet of a non-business zoning district except that LO, MO and GO zoning districts shall be considered business zoning districts (otherwise considered non- business for purposes of the sign code). A Specific Use Permit may authorize lesser spacing. 15

Expressway Sign Relocation to Office Districts Expressway signs are the only billboards which could be relocated to an office zoning district Signs relocated to an office district would still need to comply with all other spacing requirements 300 feet from a residential district 500 feet from an historic district, park or escarpment zone 500 feet from another expressway sign 2000 feet from the Trinity River 16

Non-Business Office Districts 17

Legend Zoning GO(A) LO-1 LO-2 LO-3 MO-1 MO-2 D(A) TH-1(A) TH-2(A) TH-3(A) R-10(A) R-5(A) R-13(A) R-7.5(A) R-16(A) R-1/2ac(A) R-1ac(A) CH MF-1(A) MF-1(A)(SAH) MF-2(A) MF-2(A)(SAH) MF-3(A) MF-4(A) 18

Legend Zoning GO(A) LO-1 LO-2 LO-3 MO-1 MO-2 D(A) TH-1(A) TH-2(A) TH-3(A) R-10(A) R-5(A) R-13(A) R-7.5(A) R-16(A) R-1/2ac(A) R-1ac(A) CH MF-1(A) MF-1(A)(SAH) MF-2(A) MF-2(A)(SAH) MF-3(A) MF-4(A) 300 ft Residential Buffer 19

Sign Relocation in Proximity to the Trinity River Corridor Existing No detached non-premise sign may be relocated within 2,000 feet of the Trinity River. For purposes of this subsection, the term Trinity River means the portion of the river south of the confluence of the Elm and West forks as depicted on the most recent version of the flood insurance rate maps published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency Existing 20

Sign Relocation in Proximity to the Trinity River Corridor Proposed A Specific Use Permit may authorize lesser spacing than that required above 21

Sign Relocation in Proximity to the Trinity River Corridor Measurement is taken from the centerline of the river Additional provision that billboards may not be relocated within 500 feet of a public park Applies to both expressway signs and signs on thoroughfares such as Industrial and Lamar. 22

Sign Relocation in Proximity to the Trinity River Corridor 23

Sign Relocation in Proximity to the Trinity River Corridor - 2000 ft Buffer 24

Sign Relocation in Proximity to the Trinity River Corridor - 2000 ft Buffer 25

Sign Relocation in Proximity to the Trinity River Corridor - 2000 ft Buffer 26

Sign Relocation in Proximity to the Trinity River Corridor - 2000 ft Buffer 27

Signs Relocated on Same Parcel Existing Signs relocated to a remainder must comply with the size, height, spacing, setback and other restrictions Industry Proposal Allow signs relocated to a remainder to maintain the same degree of non-conformity as original sign 28

Signs Relocated on Same Parcel Industry proposal would make it easier to relocate to remainder but not increase the degree of non-conformity of the original sign (i.e. a sign that was non-conforming relative to separation between signs or zoning classifications could maintain, but not increase, the non- conformity) This is similar to what is proposed for signs in DART right-of of-way when located within 500 ft of the original sign Spacing requirements can be addressed today through SUP process to maintain non-conformity Implications to Trinity (would allow signs to maintain proximity to Trinity if relocated to remainder) 29

Signs Relocated on Same Parcel (d) Relocation to remainder. (1) All relocated signs must be relocated on the remainder of the tract from which the parcel of land was acquired d unless relocating to the remainder is not possible for reasons such as: (A[1]) there is no remainder; (B) the sign owner is unable to obtain an agreement from the property owner of the remainder; or (C[2]) the remainder is not of sufficient size or suitable configuration to allow the relocated sign: (i) to be as visible as the original sign from the nearest main traveled thouroughfare; ; or (ii) to fully comply with the size, height, spacing, setback, and other restrictions in this article. (2) Signs relocated to a remainder may not be less conforming than the original sign 30

Recommendations Staff - Approval ZOAC Approval City Plan Commission - Approval 31

Next Steps City Council Public Hearing Mach 25, 2009 32