Summary of Tower Road Property Planning and Maintenance

Similar documents
San Joaquin County Grand Jury. Getting Rid of Stuff - Improving Disposal of City and County Surplus Public Assets Case No.

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

SECTION 22. PARKS, OPEN SPACE, TRAILS AND BUILDING GROUNDS RECORDS

Organizational Project Management

San Mateo County invites applications for the position of Real Property Manager

12. STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED SUMMARY. Date: September 21, Toronto Public Library Board. To: City Librarian. From:

Hazardous Materials in Project Development Additional Guidance

18 Sale and Other Disposition of Regional Lands Policy

CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 15, 2018 LEGISLATIVE

MEMORANDUM. Timothy P. Slottow Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Audit of City Lease Administration

ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD INTERPRETATION OF THE STANDARDS OF GENERALLY RECOGNISED ACCOUNTING PRACTICE

Adopts a revised Real Property Excess, Surplus, and Disposition Policy and supersedes Resolution No. R99-35.

County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report

PART ONE - GENERAL INFORMATION

Internal Audit Report

Crown Corporation. Table of Contents FOR THE FISCAL YEAR Harbourside Commercial Park Inc. Business Plan

Table of Contents Executive Summary...1 This audit focused on acquisitions and dispositions of City-owned real estate... 1 During the four-year

Real Estate Assets Division Manager

CITY OF HAMILTON. PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Economic Development Division

MOTION NO. M Capitol Hill Site D Agreement with Seattle Central College and Capitol Hill Housing

AUBURN UNIVERSITY PROCEDURES FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

Portland Historic Resources Zoning Regulations

Department of the Environment

INTERNAL AUDIT DIVISION REPORT 2017/062. Audit of oversight and support of property management in field missions by the Department of Field Support

2. Our community wants to demolish some blighted properties. How can we meet a CDBG national objective with this activity?

TO MEMBERS OF THE FINANCE AND CAPITAL STRATEGIES COMMITTEE: DISCUSSION ITEM

Proposed Development at Ajax Plaza Windcorp Grand Harwood Place Ltd.

University Policy UNIVERSITY PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT INVENTORY

SANTA CLARA COUNTY RHNA SUBREGION TASK FORCE GUIDING PRINCIPLES - May 2018

Proposed Framework for Multi-Residential Rental Property Licence. Tenant Issues Committee Licensing and Standards Committee

Real Estate Acquisitions Audit (Green Line LRT Stage 1)

CHAUTAUQUA COUNTY LAND BANK CORPORATION

THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE

Profiting from Building Permit Fees March 20, 2001

APPROVED: Asset Management Section (AMS): The property and asset management section of the DJJ Office of Property Management.

KENT COUNTY LAND BANK AUTHORITY REVIEW DECEMBER 2018

PROPERTY DISPOSAL POLICY

TO MEMBERS OF THE COMMITTEE ON GROUNDS AND BUILDINGS: ACTION ITEM

City of LaBelle Passive Recreational Park Management Plan

State of Florida Department of Transportation EXHIBIT A, SCOPE OF SERVICES

REGENTS POLICY PART V FINANCE AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT Chapter Real Property

LAND USE AND ZONING OVERVIEW

Voluntary standard; accepted by USEPA to comply with AAI rule. 2. Regulatory/Developmental History

Office of the County Auditor. Broward County Property Appraiser Report on Transition Review Services

Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Progress Report

Trumbull County Land Reutilization Corporation

Tenant s Scrutiny Panel and Designated Persons and Tenant s Complaints Panel

SENIOR FACULTY APARTMENT RENOVATION POLICY. Effective Date: April 1, 2009

Contract Risk Allocation Working Group. Recommended Practice for Managing Risks in Contracts Involving OWNER-FURNISHED PROPERTY

Affordable Homes Service Plan 2016/17 and 2017/18

City of Brandon Brownfield Strategy

Housing Initiative Clinic Briefs

ADMINISTRATION & FINANCE August 2010 FEDERAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT STANDARDS

SUBJECT: Report Number PDC Acquisition of 20 Single Family Residences from the Housing Authority of Portland EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

LAKE SUPERIOR STATE UNIVERSITY CHARTER SCHOOLS OFFICE REAL PROPERTY LEASE POLICY

Alternative Project Delivery Strategies for Expansion and Renovation

INVENTORY POLICY For Real Property

SOLAR MASSACHUSETTS RENEWABLE TARGET PROGRAM (225 CMR 20.00) GUIDELINE

C Secondary Suite Process Reform

MN STATUTES ANNOTATED 145A.04 POWERS AND DUTIES OF BOARD OF HEALTH. Subdivision 1.Jurisdiction; enforcement. A county or multicounty board of health

RESOLUTION NO Adopted by the Sacramento. City Council. October 27, 2009

A REPORT FROM THE OFFICE OF INTERNAL AUDIT

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

INVENTORY POLICY For Real Property

Housing and Economic Development Strategic Plan for Takoma Park OCTOBER 18, 2017

Land Procedure: Allocation Procedures - Major Projects/Sales. Summary of Changes:

Representatives from Build Toronto and City Real Estate will be in attendance at the meeting to present their review.

Staff Report. October 19, 2016 Page 1 of 17. Meeting Date: October 19, 2016

Midtown Housing Development (Phase I)

ENACTMENT AND EXECUTION OF THE PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT BETWEEN NT VALDOS UAB AND KARALIENĖS MORTOS MOKYKLA UAB ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2015

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY

MULTIPLE CHALLENGES REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL INDUSTRY FACES QUALITY CONTROL. Issues. Solution. By, James Molloy MAI, FRICS, CRE

NAVAL AIR STATION (NAS) PATUXENT RIVER Potential EUL Project Proposed Modernized Work Campus

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT. These procedures apply to all tangible, non-consumable equipment meeting all the following criteria;

PROJECT INITIATION DOCUMENT

Planning and Building Department

OSUE Dig In Class. Lilah Zautner

Town of Bristol Rhode Island

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

Identifying Troubled NYCHA Developments in Brooklyn. Cost Considerations for Rehabilitating Troubled NYCHA Brooklyn Developments.

NORTH LEEDS MATTER 2. Response to Leeds Sites and Allocations DPD Examination Inspector s Questions. August 2017

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

On: 20 April Report by: Director of Development and Housing Services. Heading: Paisley West End - Regeneration Masterplan. 1.

Implementing the Housing Now Initiative

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION

BASTROP COUNTY TAX ABATEMENT POLICY. (Guidelines and Procedures)

Property Accountability and Inventory Control. Finance and Accounting

EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY OF FELLSMERE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX D HOUSING ELEMENT

Creating a Brighter Future in the Post-Redevelopment Era

BALLOT MEASURE SUBMITTAL FORM. Jurisdiction Name: San Leandro Unified School District Election Date: 8 November 2016

LAND LEASE COMPLIANCE IN DANA POINT HARBOR SUMMARY

Buying Greener Leases for Government Facilities

Term: Sixty (60) years commencing October 1, Approximately 24,258 sq. ft.

SEE BELOW SEPTEMBER 20, 2007

GUIDE TO SUBDIVISION & LAND DEVELOPMENT

CITY OF LOGAN REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. A Resolution approving the Auto Mall Community Development Project Area Plan

Training the Next Generation of Appraisers The S.T.A.R.T. Program - Standards to Assure Responsible Training:

19 Implementation Jurisdiction Monitoring Development Applications Finance

National Trust for Historic Preservation Collections Management Policy INTRODUCTION

Transcription:

Issue Background Findings Conclusions Recommendations Responses Attachments Summary of Tower Road Property Planning and Maintenance Tower Road Property Needs Master Planning and Maintenance Plans Issue Does San Mateo County have comprehensive plans for the future planning and clear accountability for current maintenance of its Tower Road property? Summary San Mateo County (County) owns an 89 acre property in central San Mateo County at the intersection of Routes 92 and I-280 (Tower Road Property or Property). Several different County and other governmental agencies have buildings within the Property. The County recently built and occupied a $120 million juvenile facility (Youth Services Center) operated by the Probation Department and a six-room school facility (Gateway School) operated by the County Office of Education. The 2006-2007 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury (Grand Jury) conducted an investigation to determine if the County has a comprehensive plan for the future use and development and clear accountability for current maintenance of the Property. The Grand Jury made numerous visits to the Property, and interviewed several government officials. The Grand Jury found that, although the County has a valuable asset in the Tower Road property, there is no general overall plan for the site; rather, construction has taken place on the Property as County needs arose. Some sites, particularly the Sheriff's Forensic Laboratory and the Youth Services Center, reflect thoughtful site planning, while others, particularly the new Gateway School and the Hazardous Waste Facility, do not. The Grand Jury also found that maintenance of much of the Property is indifferent. The Grand Jury recommends that the County Manager and the Board of Supervisors initiate a Master Planning process to establish a long-term strategy for the property as a whole, as well as for individual parcels. The Grand Jury also recommends that the County adopt standards for the regular maintenance of the Tower Road Property and should require all users of the Property to contribute adequate funding toward such maintenance. Lastly, the Grand Jury recommends that

the County dispose of unused vehicles and other items stored at the Property, remove weeds and other debris, and execute a contract to demolish the old Hillcrest youth facility. -2-

Tower Road Property Planning and Maintenance Tower Road Property Needs Master Planning and Maintenance Plans Issue Does San Mateo County have comprehensive plans for the future planning and clear accountability for current maintenance of its Tower Road property? Background San Mateo County (County) owns an 89 acre property in central San Mateo County at the intersection of Routes 92 and I-280 (Tower Road Property or Property). Several different County and other governmental agencies occupy buildings on the Property. The County recently completed construction of and occupied a $120 million juvenile facility (Youth Services Center) operated by the Probation Department and a six-room school (Gateway School) operated by the County Office of Education. Investigation The 2006-2007 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury (Grand Jury) conducted an investigation to determine if the County has a comprehensive plan for the future use and development and clear accountability for current maintenance of the Property. The Grand Jury made numerous visits to the Property, interviewed the County Manager, the Sheriff, and representatives of the County Manager's office, Public Works Department, Sheriff's Department and County Office of Education. The Grand Jury also reviewed records of the various departments and entities connected with the Property. The Grand Jury determined that information about individual sites within the Property is not centralized, but rather is held in scattered locations and jurisdictions. It took persistent investigation to extract information about individual sites. Documents related to land-use planning for the Property were few and incomplete, causing the Jury to conclude that further inquiry would not likely produce a set of comprehensive planning documents. Findings The County has a very valuable asset in the Tower Road Property. The Property is not fully built out and additional facilities are likely to be added in the future. A number of existing facilities may not represent the highest or most efficient use of their sites, and are logical candidates for future redevelopment or upgrading. Limited availability of County-owned sites and local opposition to County development of public use facilities, will make the Tower Road Property increasingly desirable for future County facilities. Although the Property houses buildings used by more than 20 County and other governmental facilities, there has been no general overall planning of the site, but rather, construction has taken place on the Property as County needs arose. Some sites, particularly the Sheriff's Forensic -3-

Laboratory and the Youth Services Center, reflect thoughtful site planning, while others, particularly the new Gateway School and the Hazardous Waste Facility, do not. For example, the new Gateway School, a facility involving four modular classrooms and two administration buildings, was built immediately adjacent to Tower Road with no apparent consideration of site setback or landscaping. In contrast, the County, with the leadership of the Sheriff, developed and constructed a well-planned, attractive Forensic Laboratory directly across the street and of which County residents can be proud. Much of the Property is indifferently maintained. While the areas around the Forensic Laboratory and the Youth Facility are well maintained, the remainder of the Property lacks uniform maintenance standards. Construction debris remains from the construction of the Youth Facility and Gateway School and there appears to be little concern about weeds and the related fire hazard. Numerous abandoned vehicles are parked in the corporation yard and other vehicles, apparently privately-owned, are also stored on the Property. An abandoned shipping container and casually stored paint and hazardous chemicals are other examples of conditions which exist at the Property. No single County department is responsible for either site planning or for overall maintenance of the Property, although the County does have maintenance agreements with some tenants. Planning for the future use and development of the Property is affected by important environmental constraints and infrastructure considerations embedded in the documentation of the individual sites. Another factor that could affect the preparation of a quality plan for future use and development is the pending "institutional memory" crisis that may develop when a substantial number of senior administrators retire in the near future. Conclusions The County has a valuable asset in its Tower Road Property. Some recent developments such as the Forensic Lab and Juvenile Services Center are impressive buildings and, more importantly, well-sited to optimize the use of the land. Other older facilities such as the Library Offices, Elections Building and Household Hazardous Waste Facility represent suboptimal use of land and may, at some point be considered for replacement. New facilities being built such as the Gateway School (a modular building) and the proposed Receiving Home represent low-intensity land use. A Master Plan as described in Appendix A would benefit future decision makers, as well as benefit individual site occupants and the Property's residential neighbors. Such a plan would allow the County to make decisions about parcel usage that enhance the long-term value of this asset. Maintenance throughout the Property is uncoordinated and in some instances inadequate. -4-

Recommendations The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors should direct the County Manager to: 1. Initiate a Master Planning process to establish a long-term strategy for the Tower Road property as a whole as well as for individual parcels. The Master Plan should include the elements described in Appendix A. The Grand Jury acknowledges that budget considerations and the timing of future property development could affect the pace or phasing of the implementation of a Master Plan. 2. Prepare a Property Strategic Plan (see Appendix B) in conjunction with the above Master Plan, to guide decisions as facility needs arise and to ensure optimal use of San Mateo County s entire real estate portfolio. 3. Undertake efforts immediately to ensure the proposed Receiving Home is developed and constructed in accordance with sound planning principles. 4. Adopt standards for the regular maintenance of the Tower Road property and require all users of such property to contribute adequate funding toward maintenance. The Public Works Department should be made responsible for overall property maintenance and a senior official of that department should be tasked with maintenance responsibility. The County Manager should make periodic visits to the Tower Road property to ensure it is properly maintained. 5. Improve the appearance of the Tower Road property by: disposing of, or justifying the presence of, all unused vehicles and other items stored at the property removing weeds and other plant matter that constitute a fire hazard removing all debris from the property including that related to the recent construction of the Youth Services Center and Gateway School completing construction of the Gateway School infrastructure executing a contract for demolition of the old Hillcrest youth facility. -5-

Appendix A Recommended Elements for the Property Master Plan The Property Master Plan should include: A Site inventory of Existing land uses including building data, conditions and lease disposition (if applicable) Utilities and infrastructure including roads, site lighting, landscape, power, gas, water, waste, storm systems and other elements serving the site Geologic and seismic conditions Topographic survey Archaeological, paleontological, and biotic conditions and issues A Site plan and recommendations for Master strategy for land capacity and site development Parcel by parcel opportunities indicating site coverage, height limits, setbacks showing illustrative examples Traffic and parking strategy, policy and restrictions onsite as well as impact on peripheral access roads Site utilities and infrastructure capacity and strategy to accommodate optimized uses Landscape strategy for the Property as well as by parcel Archaeological, paleontological, and biotic conditions, restrictions and mitigations -6-

Appendix B Recommended Elements for the Property Strategic Plan The Property Strategic Plan would allow the County to look at opportunities within its entire portfolio when Tower Road sites are being considered to determine if the Property is the optimum location for the requirement. Such a Plan would include: Land and building inventory Disposition (lease vs. owned) Physical condition Adequacy for purpose Financial model of the County s real estate costs Current and projected occupancy and site utilization data Parking strategy and analysis Highest and best use assessment Model for decision making and financial implications as new or altered facility requirements arise Operating cost and maintenance analysis and model Recommendations to optimize the value of the County s real estate portfolio, identifying inefficient, overcrowded, physically or functionally deficient or other suboptimal conditions -7-

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Inter-Departmental Correspondence County Manager s Office DATE: July 30, 2007 BOARD MEETING DATE: August 14, 2007 SPECIAL NOTICE: None VOTE REQUIRED: None TO: FROM: Honorable Board of Supervisors John L. Maltbie, County Manager SUBJECT: 2006-07 Grand Jury Response RECOMMENDATION: Accept this report containing the County s responses to the following 2006-07 Grand Jury reports: Summary of Coyote Point Marina: A Valuable Asset Deserving Effective Management; Health and Human Services Survey on Compliance with Recent Grand Jury Recommendations; and Tower Road Property and Maintenance. VISION ALIGNMENT: Commitment: Responsive, effective and collaborative government. Goal 20: Government decisions are based on careful consideration of future impact, rather than temporary relief or immediate gain. This activity contributes to the goal by ensuring that all Grand Jury findings and recommendations are thoroughly reviewed by the appropriate County departments and that, when appropriate, process improvements are made to improve the quality and efficiency of services provided to the public and other agencies. DISCUSSION: The County is mandated to respond to the Grand Jury within 90 days from the date that reports are filed with the County Clerk and Elected Officials are mandated to respond within 60 days. To that end, attached are the County s responses to the following Grand Jury reports: Coyote Point Marina: A Valuable

Asset Deserving Effective Management issued May 17, 2007; Health and Human Services Survey on Compliance with Recent Grand Jury Recommendations issued May 22, 2007; and Tower Road Property and Maintenance issued May 24, 2007.

Tower Road Property and Maintenance Findings: Staff is in general agreement with the Grand Jury s findings. Recommendations: The Board of Supervisors should direct the County Manager to: 1. Initiate a Master Planning process to establish a long-term strategy for the Tower Road property as a whole as well as for individual parcels. The Master Plan should include the elements described in Appendix A. The Grand Jury acknowledges that budget considerations and the timing of future property development could affect the pace or phasing of the implementation of a Master Plan. Response: Concur. The Department of Public Works, in conjunction with the Office of Economic Development/Real Property Services, is in the process of developing a strategy for addressing the County s short- and long-term space needs through a comprehensive space needs analysis accompanied by updated or master plans for all County properties, including the Tower Road property. This strategy includes performing an inventory of all County-owned and leased space, determining current and projected future space needs, evaluating current master plans for County campuses, updating the master plans where appropriate, and developing new master plans where necessary. Tower Road will be one of many County campuses to be evaluated and master-planned. The intent is to develop a long-range plan for addressing facilities needs through future capital improvement projects. The Grand Jury guidance provided in its Appendices A and B provide a framework for the accomplishment of this plan. As part of its FY 2008-09 budget request, the Department of Public Works will develop a capital project request that includes beginning the space needs analysis by December 31, 2007. 2. Prepare a Property Strategic Plan (see Appendix B) in conjunction with the above Master Plan, to guide decisions as facility needs arise and to ensure optimal use of San Mateo County s entire real estate portfolio. Response: Concur. As explained in the response to Recommendation 1, a comprehensive plan and review process is being developed to address all of the County s capital projects, infrastructure, real estate assets, and

future needs. The guidelines provided by the Grand Jury for both Master and Strategic Plan development will be incorporated into this process. 3. Undertake efforts immediately to ensure the proposed Receiving Home is developed and constructed in accordance with sound planning principles. Response: Concur. This recommendation has been implemented in accordance with sound construction planning principles. The Receiving Home design has been fully completed. The architect retained for this purpose was selected through a Request for Proposals process and has significant experience designing this type of facility. A construction contractor will be selected through a competitive bidding process to be conducted in strict compliance with the Public Contract Code. Oversight of the project and construction inspection will be done directly by the construction management staff in the Department of the Public Works Capital Projects Section. 4. Adopt standards for the regular maintenance of the Tower Road property and require all users of such property to contribute adequate funding toward maintenance. The Public Works Department should be made responsible for overall property maintenance and a senior official of that department should be tasked with maintenance responsibility. The County Manager should make periodic visits to the property to ensure it is properly maintained. Response: Concur. The current County-owned rent schedule for the facilities located at the Tower Road campus includes funding for property maintenance immediately external to the individual buildings, including parking lots. As noted in response to Recommendation 5, an assessment will be made by the end of August 2007 regarding the cost and staffing needed to expand these services to the entire Tower Road property. This assessment, including options for service expansion and impact on facility rental charges, will be submitted to the County Manager's Office for consideration. The Public Works Facility Maintenance section is responsible for ensuring the Tower Road property is properly maintained. 5. Improve the appearance of the Tower Road property by: disposing of, or justifying the presence of, all unused vehicles and other items stored at the property removing weeds and other plant matter that constitute a fire hazard removing all debris from the property including that related to the recent construction of the Youth Services Center and Gateway School

completing construction of the Gateway School infrastructure executing a contract for demolition of the old Hillcrest youth facility. Response: Concur. The County Manager s Office and the Department of Public Works agree that the Tower Road property needs to be improved and properly maintained. Planned activities are as follows: (1) disposal and/or relocation of all unused vehicles and other large equipment currently stored at the property will begin with a current site assessment to be conducted by August 31, 2007; (2) expand and/or extend landscaping services to Tower Road property not covered by current rental agreements; (3) first-time implementation of the demolition and deconstruction policy recently adopted by the Board of Supervisors at the Hillcrest facility, including maximum feasible recycling of construction materials. The Gateway School is now completed and occupied. There are materials left over from construction that have been reserved for the garden, which have been temporarily moved and stacked so not immediately visible to the public.