Day 1 Session 4: International & Country Perspectives on Financing, Upgrading and Affordable Housing (Monitor Group)

Similar documents
Affordable Housing in Kenya

TRAINING ON FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FOR KSAD OFFICERS

ASHOKA: HOUSING FOR ALL Building Affordable Housing Communities. MANIKANDAN KP November 2013 TERI

Findings: City of Johannesburg

Guidance Note on Accounting for Real Estate Transactions. Dinesh Jangid

Brickwork Ratings reaffirms the ratings for the Non-Convertible Debentures of Crores of Crescent Amity Realtors Private Limited (CARPL).

Real Estate Funds. 22 nd June Presented by : Mr. Harish Gagwani Sr. Investment Manager. CA. Rajeev Saraogi Investment Manager

R E Q U E S T F O R P R O P O S A L S

1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE CIP VISION LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Municipal Act Planning Act...

Growing Housing Opportunities in Africa

ROLE OF SOUTH AFRICAN GOVERNMENT IN SOCIAL HOUSING. Section 26 of the Constitution enshrines the right to housing as follows:

Non-Profit Co-operative Housing: Working to Safeguard Canada s Affordable Housing Stock for Present and Future Generations

REAL ESTATE IN INDIA 2017

AN OVERVIEW OF LAND TOOLS IN SUB- SAHARAN AFRICA: PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE

JANUARY 2018 CONSUMER SENTIMENT REPORT. What does 2018 have in store for Indian Real Estate?

Promoting Affordable Housing in Madison s Isthmus Neighborhoods

The Affordable. Housing Finance Summit Highlights. Vinod Kothari Consultants P. Ltd. presents.

Rating Rationale Artsy Homes Real Estate Private Limited 4 Jun Coup on. Maturi ty Date. 29-Jun Zero

Cities for development

Corridor of growth. Corridor Description and Rating UNDRI - PISOLI. Areas Included: Undri, Pisoli, Handewadi and Mohammedwadi

Government of Uttar Pradesh. Workshop for Housing for All Date - 09/08/2016. State Urban Development Agency

Bending the Cost Curve Solutions to Expand the Supply of Affordable Rentals. Executive Summary

SOCIAL HOUSING THE WAY FORWARD

Subject. Date: 2016/10/25. Originator s file: CD.06.AFF. Chair and Members of Planning and Development Committee

Economic and Fiscal Impact Analysis of Future Station Transit Oriented Development

Hkkjr es a vkokl dh izo`fùk,oa izxfr lecu/kh fjiksvz] twu] 2003

Document under Separate Cover Refer to LPS State of Housing

Revenue Recognition- Real Estate Companies

Housing Reset :: Creative Advisory Accelerating Non-Profit / City Partnerships What We Heard

MULTIPLE CHALLENGES REAL ESTATE APPRAISAL INDUSTRY FACES QUALITY CONTROL. Issues. Solution. By, James Molloy MAI, FRICS, CRE

Affordable housing in India: Case of Mumbai. Arnab Jana May 18, 2017

SPECIAL EDITION INNOVATION+CITIES THE HOME STRETCH 14

Course Number Course Title Course Description

State of the Johannesburg Inner City Rental Market

Low Cost Housing in India

Exploring Shared Ownership Markets outside London and the South East

Ontario Rental Market Study:

UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPER S DECISION- MAKING IN THE REGION OF WATERLOO

TDR - Lessons from Mumbai

Informal urban land markets and the poor. P&DM Housing Course March 2009 Lauren Royston

Whispering Heights Real Estate Private Limited

City and County of San Francisco

Housing is a key component in the history of community. Getting to Scale: The Need for a New Model in Housing and Community Development

Developing a Consumer-Run Housing Co-op in Hamilton: A Feasibility Study

Housing. Imagine a Winnipeg...: Alternative Winnipeg Municipal Budget

Summary of Findings & Recommendations

INVESTOR PRESENTATION MAY 2013

Housing as an Investment Greater Toronto Area

Course Descriptions Real Estate and the Built Environment

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OFFICE OF PR.COMMISSIONER(H,LD&CWG)

96 (lower income group [LIG] 12; middle income group [MIG] 53 and higher income group [HIG] 31) No. of units 3,950 (LIG 380; MIG 1,644 and HIG 1,926)

Housing the World: Leveraging Private Sector Resources for the Public Good

UNDERSTANDING THE TAX BASE CONSEQUENCES OF LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS

Douja Promotion Groupe Addoha. An African leader of Real Estate Development

Housing and the Economy: Impacts, Forecasts and Challenges

Changes in Real Estate Finance and Their Effect on Retail Development in Urban Areas

Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation. Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation Government of India. JnNURM & RAY

BUSINESS PLAN Part 1

Day 1 Session 1 'Rajiv Awas Yojana - Slum Free India Mission' by P.K.Mohanty (Joint Secretary and Mission Director JNNURM, MoHUPA)

City Futures Research Centre

Housing and the Economy: Impacts, Forecasts and Current Research 2018 Update

Panache. Project profile

General Manager of Planning, Urban Design and Sustainability. CAC Policy Update: Simplifying CACs on New Rental Housing and Commercial Development

Community Housing Federation of Victoria Inclusionary Zoning Position and Capability Statement

7. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

Ind AS 115 Impact on the real estate sector and construction companies

Channelling Financial Flows for Adequate and Affordable Housing

GM Infinite s Global Techies Town

HOUSING ISSUES IN NORTHERN ALBERTA. June 1, 2007

Suburb Profile Report. Paddington, 2021 NSW

UN-HABITAT: Philippines - Overview of the Current Housing Rights Situation and Related Activities

Fort Collins Housing Affordability Policy Study Stakeholder Workshop #1

S L U M R E H A B I L I T A T I O N A U T H O R I T Y M U M B A I M A H A R A S H T R A I N D I A M A R C H 2 1 ST

Rent Policy. Approved on: 9 December 2010 Board of Management Consolidated November 2015

Paragraph 47 National Planning Policy Framework. rpsgroup.com/uk

Chapter 24 Saskatchewan Housing Corporation Housing Maintenance 1.0 MAIN POINTS

PROPOSED $100 MILLION FOR FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING

GM Global Techies Town

NATIONAL PLANNING AUTHORITY. The Role of Surveyors in Achieving Uganda Vision 2040

Scheme of Service. for. Housing Officers

Permanent Supportive Housing: An Operating Cost Analysis

US Worker Cooperatives: A State of the Sector

Affordable Homes Service Plan 2016/17 and 2017/18

A Diagnostic Checklist for Business Inspection

CPACE Financing Overview

Credit Constraints for Small Multifamily Rental Properties

Analysis of the Financial Viability of New Purpose- Built Rental Housing at Transit-Oriented Locations in Metro Vancouver

Presenter: Jennifer Oomen Associate Director, Center For Innovation In Shelter & Finance Habitat for Humanity International

The cost of increasing social and affordable housing supply in New South Wales

Business and Property Committee

How Swaziland Is Upgrading Its Slums

First Sponsor Group Limited Investor Presentation 24 July 2015

COLLIERS INTERNATIONAL 2019 LANDLORD SENTIMENT SURVEY

Denver Comprehensive Housing Plan. Housing Advisory Committee Denver, CO August 3, 2017

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ) FOR COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING ACTION PLAN

PROJECT INITIATION DOCUMENT

FICCI QUARTERLY SURVEY ON INDIAN MANUFACTURING SECTOR FEDERATION OF INDIAN CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRY FICCI QUARTERLY SURVEY

A Comparative Analysis of Affordable Housing in Saudi Arabia

B8 Can public sector land help solve the housing crisis?

Detroit Inclusionary Housing Plan & Market Study Preliminary Inclusionary Housing Feasibility Study Executive Summary August, 2016

Transcription:

Cities Alliance Project Output Day 1 Session 4: International & Country Perspectives on Financing, Upgrading and Affordable Housing (Monitor Group) India International Workshop: Scaling up Upgrading and Affordable Housing: From National Policies, to State Programs, and City-Wide Slum-Free Interventions P120776 This project output was created with Cities Alliance grant funding.

2 0 0 9 AMSTERDAM BEIJING CAMBRIDGE CHICAGO DELHI DUBAI FRANKFURT HONG KONG JOHANNESBURG LONDON LOS ANGELES MADRID MANILA MILAN MOSCOW MUMBAI MUNICH NEW YORK PALO ALTO PARIS SAN FRANCISCO SÃO PAULO SEOUL SHANGHAI SINGAPORE TOKYO TORONTO ZURICH A Market Based Approach to Low Income Housing : Commercial Viability of Supply Based on a Project for National Housing Bank, with active support from World Bank and funded by FIRST Initiative Implementation support by IFC and Michael & Susan Dell Foundation January 27 th, 2010 Copyright 2009 by Monitor Company Group, L.P. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without the permission of Monitor Company Group, L.P. This document provides an outline of a presentation and is incomplete without the accompanying oral commentary and discussion. COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL

Low Income Housing in India: A Rs 1,300,000 Cr Opportunity (USD 260 Billion) Confidential MHI 1 (INR) >80000 40000 80000 Urban Income Pyramid 1% (0.7MM) 5% (3.4MM) Offering & Market Potential Price of unit 2 > INR 25 Lakhs Potential demand from ~2 M HHs with estimated Market Size:of ~INR 500,000 Cr Various mortgage finance options available for segment Competitive Highlights Leading developers (DLF, Unitech) Highly competitive, slowing demand growth due to increasing prices and high interest costs 30000 40000 20000 30000 4% (2.7MM) 5% (3.4MM) Price of unit: INR 10 25 Lakhs Potential demand from ~5 M HHs with estimated Market Size of ~INR 900,000 Cr Mortgage finance available broadly Mostly small / regional developers (Naik Navare) Major plans / announcements from many large players (e.g. Omaxe, Ansals, Lodha, MAYTAS, Purvankara, etc.) 10000 20000 5000 10000 <5000 22% (15.0MM) 31% (21.1MM) 33% (22.4MM) Price of House: INR 3 10 Lacs Potential demand from ~21 M HHs with estimated Market Size ~INR 1300,000 Cr Finance available for MHI > INR 12K in the formal sector, limited availability below MHI of INR 12K; negligible availability to the informal sector Presence of urban development bodies (DDA, MHADA) Nascent presence of scale private developers (TMC, Tata, Homex) Note: 1 Monthly Household Income; 2 Affordability defined as households which have EMI / MHI Ratio of 40% of a Home loan which has a 20% down payment on an Home value, EMI level of INR 1,200 per Lac (at 12% interest for a 15 year loan) Source: NHB Trends in Housing; CRIS Infac Report; Monitor Research 2 Copyright 2008 Monitor Company Group, L.P. Confidential

Customer Perspective: Social Need and Willingness to Pay (16 Focus Groups and over 2,000 potential customers) Confidential Many lower income households live in poor conditions and are dissatisfied with their housing situation; but their searches for affordable housing have been unsuccessful Profile - Nathubhai Steady job as a factory worker in a textile enterprise in Ahmedabad Monthly HH income ~ Rs 8,000, ($160) savings up to Rs 900 ($18) p.m. Lives in 1 RmK in low income neighborhood, Rent Rs 1800 ($ 36) Family size: 5 (mother, wife, 2 children) Assets Bank Account, LIC (Rs 3L), TV Education: Both children attend private Gujarati medium schools Rent: Increased by 50% in past 3 years, has moved every 2 to 3 years Appalling conditions of Slum-Dwellers Live in poorly constructed small cramped houses Poor sanitary conditions - shared toilets, bad drainage, water logging during monsoons Lack of facilities - properly planned access points, walkways, gardens, dedicated schools etc. Profile - Ganesh Self-employed Mechanic in Mumbai Monthly HH income ~ Rs 11,000 ($ 220), savings up to Rs 1000 ($ 20) p.m. Lives in 150 sq. ft. room in slums, Rent Rs 2,400 ($ 48) Married with 2 children Assets Bank Account, LIC (Rs 1.5L), Refrigerator and PC Education: Both children attend English-medium school Rent: Has seen significant & frequent increases in rent, has moved house 5 times in 12 years Both share a dream A house of their own Can afford a 250-350 sqft. house, willing to make 20% down payment & pay 35% of monthly income as EMIs to realize their dream Source: Primary Research (n=2000), Monitor Analysis 3

Confidential Low Income, not Low Cost or Low Quality 4

An Alternate Business Model Land as Inventory Sample Project Economics: Margin 22%, IRR 40% Confidential Project details Option UOM Key Numbers With Land Cost / No Revenue Share Total Land size 10 sq. ft. 435,600 FSI allowed 1.80 Total area available for construction sq. ft. 784,080 Area for Commercial 5% sq. ft. 39,204 Area for Residential 95% sq. ft. 744,876 Land Cost FSI INR/sq. ft. 200 Construction Cost INR/sq. ft. 800 Average size of flat (sq.ft.) sq. ft. 396 Number of flats nos 1,883 Average realisation per flat (Rs) INR 476,799 Mix of Houses - Area % of number 1 RMK 29% sq. ft. 220 1 BHK Type 1 32% sq. ft. 300 1 BHK Type 2 40% sq. ft. 400 Loading Factor for Saleable Value 25% Mix of Houses - Base Price in Phase 1 1 RMK INR/sq. ft. 1100 1 BHK Type 1 INR/sq. ft. 1200 1 BHK Type 2 INR/sq. ft. 1250 Price Rise between Phases 0% Average Residential (Rs) INR/sq. ft. 1,205 Average Commercial Yield Factor 2 Commercial (Rs) INR/sq. ft. 2,410 Overall realization from project Revenue from different Sources Commercial (Rs) INR 9.45 Residential (Rs) INR 89.76 Overall Realization of the Project (Rs. Crores) 99.21 Costs from different Sources Cost of land INR cr. 15.7 Construction Cost INR cr. 62.7 INR Sales and Marketing Overall cost of project (Rs. Crores) cr. 3.0 INR cr. 81.38 INR cr. 17.82 Net realization (Rs) Margin 21.9% Return on Investment (IRR) 40% Assumptions: The project is constructed over 3 phases - each phase consists of approximately 600 flats Price is constant over the duration of the project The value of area per square feet is enhanced using two methods: Commercial space is valued more than residential space with an Average Yield Factor of 2 The mix of flats is such as to allow some area to be sold at a higher price point Cost of construction is Rs. 800 per square foot (comparable to other estimates for such projects based on our experience) Land is owned by the developer 5

Making a Market: Phase 1: 2008-2009 Facilitating supply using an ecosystem approach Confidential RAISING AWARENESS Government, regulatory bodies etc. Press (over 20 articles) Conferences and industry sessions One on one meetings with broad range of stakeholders (over 400) END TO END SUPPORT Conveying the opportunity Arranging customer financing Selecting land, Obtaining customers Sharing best practices (architectural designs, site layouts, etc.) SMALL DEVELOPERS AND NEW PLAYERS BUILDING THE ECOSYSTEM Existing and new players for mortgage finance (including incubating housing finance companies) PE and VC funds (incubated a USD 100 Million housing ecosystem fund) Research on optimal architectural designs, low cost construction technology, sustainability etc. Two years, 600 developers, and downturn in the economy to: 1) Achieve a clear recognition in the market of the opportunity 2) Lead to a number of players in this space 6

Market demonstration of Demand: Private sector projects across India Confidential Mumbai :Ambivili Neptune Group 100 acres Phase 1: 1800 units; Sector 1: 600 flats sold out in 3 days 1-BHK and 2-BHK Rs 4.73 lakh and Rs 8.40 lakh Project launched on March 27 Ahmedabad: Vatva Taral Bakeri Phase 1: 800 units Construction start: June 2009 Price: Rs 3.3 lakh 5.6 lakh Ahmedabad: Vatva Foliage Developers Phase 1: 400 units Price: Rs 2.81 lakh upwards Maharashtra :Boisar Tata Housing 67 acres: Phase 1: 1300 units for LIH 1-RMK and 1BHK Rs 3.9 lakh and Rs 6.7 lakh Bangalore: Atibele Janadhar 11 acres: 1500 units 1BHK and 2 BHK; Rs 4 lakh and 6 lakh Bangalore: Value Budget Housing Rs 3-9 lakh townships on minimum 10 acre plots Maharashtra: Karjat TMC Matheran Realty 15,000 units by June 2011; 3,000 units in Phase 1 June 09 6,000 flats @ Rs 3 lakh Possession: June 2009 Potential demand from 21 Million Households with estimated Market Size ~INR 1,300,000 Cr (USD 260 Billion) 7

Confidential Entry by potential scale players Tanaji Malusare City Value Budget Housing Development Corporation Tata Housing Launched by Matheran Realty Pvt. Ltd. in Karjat Aims to create large scale commercially viable housing for low-income households 66,000 applications for sale of 3,000 units in Phase 1. Will contain 15,000 flats 1-RMK 200 and 300 sq. ft. at 2.1 lakh and 3.15 lakh, 1-BHK 400 sq.ft. at 5.25 lakh and 2-BHK 500 sq.ft. at 7.35 lakh Jerry Rao (founder, MphasiS) and P.S. Jayakumar (ex Citibank) set up housing development company Large business opportunity with significant social impact Goal: 1 Million homes in urban India in price range of Rs. 3-9 lakh in next decade The company has partnered with Monitor to test feasibility of vision, provide in-depth knowledge of the market and assist in building the organization structure Launched a low income housing township in Boisar, 98 kms from South Mumbai Spread over 67 acres and has 1,000 flats in the first phase 1 RMK 283 sq. ft and 1 RMK with 360 sq. ft. Flats priced between Rs. 3.9 lakh and Rs. 6.7 lakh 8

Confidential A Low Income Housing Finance Business: Outline The business will primarily focus on the urban customer in the Income Group Rs. 5,000-20,000 who does not currently have access to a home loan Customer Profile and Focus Geography: The need for low income housing and home loan financing is especially acute in urban areas, which are seeing rapid population expansion through migration from rural areas Reach: The HFC will have an urban focus and will establish presence in Metros and surrounding Tier I/II/III cities Branch: Hub and Spoke model with 55 branches by Year 10 Target Monthly Household Income range: Rs. 5,000 20,000 Customer groups: Both salaried customers who are unable to access home loans and informal sector customers, i.e. self-employed and salaried unorganized individuals Product Offerings and Pricing Structure Primary Product: Loan for home purchase Loan Amount: 2 8 Lakhs: Families earning between Rs. 5,000 and 20,000 can afford homes costing up to 40 times their monthly income, i.e. Rs. 3 10 Lakhs Loan to Value: 50 80%: A minimum of 20% equity from the customer will help mitigate the financier s risk, while ensuring that the loan is not sub-prime Installment-Income Ratio (IIR): 30-40%: This income group typically pays between 20-25% of their monthly incomes as rent, so a 30-40% EMI is feasible Loan Tenure: 6 15 years: Will vary based on the customer s income Pricing Structure Adjustable Rate Mortgages with typical interest rates between 11-15% based on down-payment amount, IIRs, loan Tenure, and perceived risk profile of customer; and allowing approximately a 3-4% spread Processing fee of 1% of loan value to re-cover loan origination and credit check costs 9

A Low Income Housing Finance Business Customer Level Economics: Branch Level Revenue & Costs Per Customer Cost Analysis Confidential The average cost to acquire a customer is Rs. 8,000 and cost to service their loan over the loan term is Rs. 20,000, while the net income earned per customer is Rs. 88,000 Assumptions Income Earned Per Cost to Serve Per Customer (Rs.) 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 Customer (Rs.) 5,000 0 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 3,000 Legal & Technical clearance 2,000 Sales Incentive 2,000 1,000 4,000 Office Documentation, Average Overheads Storage & Retrieval NPA Per Customer Revenue Analysis 84,000 Net Interest Income 4,000 Processing Fee 20,000 Operating Overheads 88,000 Total 32,000 Total Cost to Serve Average Loan Size: Rs. 4 Lakhs Interest Rate Charged: 14% Loan Processing Fee: 1% NPA: 1.0% 1 A 0.5% of loan value bonus is provided to the branch sales force as an incentive fee for each loan generated These assumptions are typical for most HFCs (our data is based on inputs from Dewan, GRUH, HDFC and MHFC) Observations It costs approximately Rs. 32,000 to serve each customer, i.e. cost to serve is about 8% of loan size, The HFC would earn approximately Rs. 88,000 in net income from each customer Net Profit Per Customer Over 8 years (not including other costs) is approximately Rs. 56,000 Note: 1 DHFC and Gruh NPAs are less than 1% 10

A Low Income Housing Finance Business Profitability over a 10 year time frame Confidential The HFC will turn profitable after 3 years of operations, and it is anticipated that margins will grow sequentially in progressive years Profitability over a 10 year time period Assumptions 1 Net Profit/(Loss) (Rs. crores) Percentage Return 300 250 200 150 101.9 100 52.6 50 27.3 5.6 16.0-2.8-1.2 0.8 0-50 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 25 20 Return On Assets 19.0 Return On Equity 17.0 15 13.0 10.0 10 6.0 5 0.8 2.2 2.9 2.5 2.6 2.9 0-3.0-5 -4.0 1.0 276.9 180.3 Y9 Y10 22.0 23.0 3.2 3.3 Average Loan Tenure: 8 years Cost of debt: 10% Debt Equity ratio: Year 5-4: 1 Year 10-6: 1 Capex in Years 1 to 3- Rs 3 Cr (towards software and hardware) NPA of 1 % provided on all loans disbursed from Year 4 Net Profit/Loss = Post Tax (Income Expenses) ROE = Net Profit/Loss / Average Equity ROA = Net Profit/Loss / Average Assets Observations The HFC will operate at a loss for the first few years, but will turn profitable by year 3 ROE of 23% in year 10 is very robust by the Indian financial industry standards ROA of 3% in year 10 is comparable to HFC industry standards -10-13.9-13.0-15 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6 Y7 Y8 Y9 Y10 Note: 1 Based on conversations with HFC Industry Experts and existing HFCs 11

Low Income Housing as a Driver for Economic Growth Wide Range of Benefits Market based affordable housing can be part of a broader portfolio of solutions to housing for the poor and lower income groups Provide alternative to Urban Slums ~40M people live in urban slums without basic facilities such as sanitation, water, schools, etc Renters disempowered. All power is w/ slum lords Slum lords own houses and benefit from Slum Rehabilitation Schemes Slums create high pressure on infrastructure within a city Benefits for families of Urban LIG Housing is essential for the well-being of a family Enhanced security and health through organized housing with access to sanitation Access to better services (schools, healthcare etc.) which are typically available to higherincome groups Affordable Housing Aiding Overall Economic Development Construction of low income housing provides disproportionate job creatiion Creates signficant economic value for state (taxes, anxiliary economic activity, source of labor potentially leading to industry, etc Creation of Low-Risk Asset for Families Long term wealth creation due to value of asset, saving on rent & collateral for loan A security net in crisis Low income houses typically built on land with low cost per sq. ft. Low likelihood of price depreciation, Hence downside risk is low Allows Government funds to focus on poor Limited government resources can be spent on rental and owned housing for poorer sections of society Sets benchmarks that can be used for housing for the poor 12 Copyright 2009 Monitor Company Group, L.P. Confidential IND

Our path forward: Monitor s plans for the next two years In the next few years, we intend to facilitate the scaling up of a robust, commercially viable, and sustainable low income housing market in India Ensuring Supply of Housing (Distinct Business Model) Attract players who can provide large scale low income housing at reasonable prices, including Facilitating entry of mid/large developers, Attracting international low income housing developers and new players into the field Facilitating Consumer Finance Formal Sector: Highlight opportunity for low income home financing to large banks and HFCs Informal Sector: Catalyzing housing finance through banks, dedicated HFCs, MFIs, etc. Facilitating access to low-cost, long-term debt Supporting Government Scale up Low Income Housing Facilitating Broader Market Innovations Develop a list of options relevant in the Urban Indian Context, including the pros and cons of each option and the situations where it would be effective Working with the central Government and nodal agencies like NHB to transfer this knowledge to local decision makers. Sustainability Elements in Low Income Housing Developing Consumer Education Modules Developing a Paradigm for Low Income Rental Housing Monitoring, Evaluating, and Spreading Best Practices/Addressing Unintended Consequences Developing Architectural Benchmarks and Low Cost Construction Technologies Working with financial institutions to lower cost of service for low income customers Including low income housing in SEZs Facilitating the flow of long term low cost debt to the sector, including warehouse facilities and securitization options. 13 Copyright 2009 Monitor Company Group, L.P. Confidential IND

Confidential Back-up 14

Confidential Key Challenges and Critical Success Factors Several challenges will need to be addressed in order to enable the creation of a robust, commercially viable, and sustainable low income housing market in India Ensuring Sustained Supply of Housing in the Rs. 3-7 Lakhs Range Some traditional developers have expressed interest in low income housing because of the current economic downturn once the market recovers, may move out of this space Most developers are building affordable homes that cost between Rs. 10-20 Lakhs, but the real need and business opportunity is houses costing Rs. 3-7 Lakhs The challenge is to ensure a sustained supply of housing in the Rs. 3-7 Lakhs price range Facilitating Consumer Finance Supporting Government Scale up Low Income Housing Access to home financing for low income customers remains the major choke point to the scale development of this market There is a need for additional traditional financial institutions to serve the salaried low income market, since existing banks and HFCs are slow to process loans and charge high rates of interest New entrants are required to serve the low income informal customer segment - this group is currently un-served because they are perceived as being high risk and high cost to serve While the government is interested in stimulating private sector led approaches to low income housing, they are unclear on effective enabling policy measures They are concerned that the private sector is largely profit driven and benefits will not percolate to customers State policies need to be customized to local situations on the ground to be effective Facilitating Broader Market Innovations The low income housing market will also require the creation of an enabling ecosystem through interventions/projects such as: Introduction of Sustainability Elements, Development of Consumer Education Modules, Development of a Paradigm for Low Income Rental Housing, Monitoring, Evaluating, and Spreading Best Practices/Addressing Unintended Consequences, Developing Architectural Benchmarks and Low Cost Construction Technologies, Working with financial institutions to lower cost of service for low income customers, Including low income housing in SEZs, Facilitating the flow of long term low cost debt to the sector, including warehouse facilities and securitization options etc. 15

Confidential Facilitating Supply of Housing for Low Income Customers We would like to ensure a sustained supply of housing in the Rs. 3-7 Lakhs range, and facilitate the entry of new, scale players into this market Challenge Due to the economic downturn, some traditional developers have expressed interest in low income housing because of the current economic downturn once the market recovers, may move out of this space Most developers are building affordable homes that cost between Rs. 10-20 Lakhs, but the real need and business opportunity is houses costing Rs. 3-7 Lakhs The challenge is to ensure a sustained supply of housing in the Rs. 3-7 Lakhs price range There is broad awareness in the market of the business opportunity in Low Income Housing so our approach will be reactive For developers who are currently in (or interested in) this space, encourage them to build housing in the Rs. 3-7 Lakhs range Focus on large and medium developers Approach Facilitate the entry of new, scale players (such as corporates, successful entrepreneurs). Demonstrate commercial viability and sustained demand for homes costing between Rs. 3-7 Lakhs, and help them enter this market through provision of end-to-end support Monitor support varies from non-commercial sharing of information to light-touch customized delivery of existing information to traditional customized consulting. Monitor is also tracking the space and engaging with a broad group of developers (doing group sessions on areas like ways to lower cost of construction, sustainable elements, etc) 16

Confidential Facilitating Consumer Financing for Low Income Customers We would like to extend access to home financing to low income customers, especially informal sector workers Access to home financing for low income customers remains the major choke point to the scale development of this market For low income formal sector customers: Challenge Large public sector banks are slow to process loan applications Small housing finance companies charge higher rates of interest to cover their cost of funds New entrants are required to serve the low income informal customer segment - this group is currently un-served because they are perceived as being high risk and high cost to serve Understanding real versus perceived credit risk and managing costs to serve are the key challenges for HFCs serving the informal sector Approach Encourage a few traditional financial institutions to serve low income formal sector customers Work with them on specific projects and ensure they see the value in the market Work on policy aspects to encourage traditional Fis to serve this market Incubate new housing finance companies to serve the informal sector etc. Dissemination of the opportunity through media, conferences & events, and group sessions Highlight the opportunity to a shortlist of alternate financial institutions such as MFIs, NBFCs, cooperative banks etc. who have the reach and potential capabilities to effectively serve this market Help them start an HFC. From designing the go-to-market strategy and configuration to deliver, to raising funds (helping them with the IM and using our network of capital providers), to connecting them to other service providers and players and helping them with their NHB application. 17

Confidential Supporting the Government to Scale Low Income Housing We would like to work with central and state governments to devise ways to incentivize the private sector to provide access to low income housing Challenge The government, at the central and state level, is interested in facilitating the supply of affordable housing through the private sector; but is unsure of effective ways to do so They are concerned that the private sector will enter this segment to make large profits, and benefits will not percolate to the customers The local situation on the ground and policies will define the appropriate low income housing solution on the ground Preferred Approach Short Term Approach Work with the central government to develop a portfolio of options to incentivize private players to provide low income housing Create a list of options relevant in the urban Indian context identify the pros and cons of each option, and situations where they are applicable and/or likely to be misused. Shortlist a set of options that are effective in different environments Work with the central Government and nodal agencies like NHB transfer this knowledge to local decision makers Support a few ULBs on implementing these options and use this learning to refine the options Leverage our networks to address Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) and state governments to raise awareness of the potential for private sector led approaches to low income housing Follow up with interested ULBs/States to raise awareness among developers in their geography Provide support in getting a few projects off the ground Tie-up with the local governments to deliver targeted pieces of support, e.g., customer education modules 18

Confidential Development and Facilitation of Market Innovations In addition to our core market making efforts, we intend to work on special projects that will help create an enabling ecosystem for the scalable growth of low income housing in India Development and Dissemination of Customer Education Modules The success of the affordable housing market in India will create a new group of home-owners that is unaware of the responsibilities of home ownership. We intend to: Communicate key information on home/developer selection, financing, maintenance, and long term value enhancement to this segment Create modules in a format that is easily accessible to target segments i.e. in local languages, involving role-play and illustrations Disseminate this information through stakeholders that have aligned incentives (e.g., developers and housing finance companies on a financial education module). First module will be a customer finance module (in discussion with FMO about funding) Monitoring, Evaluating, and Spreading Best Practices/ Addressing Unintended Consequences The low income segments move from their current rental housing into the low income flats, they will be among the first home-owners in this income group. While we expect the impact of moving from tenements and slums into homes in good neighborhoods to be positive, there are also likely to be problems. If we can identify these early, we may be able. Therefore we intend to: Assess the financial, socio-cultural, and broader (e.g., health, education levels) implications on the first sets of customers (about 200) moving into these low income houses Follow a these customers over a 30 month period; this will also allow determining outcomes of areas like home ownership, maintenance, etc. Develop approaches to reduce negative factors and spread best practices Provide rapid feedback to developers, housing finance companies, the government, and other relevant stakeholders (RBI, NHB etc.) and engage relevant players in addressing the issues/opportunities (so these become the norm in the market 19

Confidential Development and Facilitation of Market Innovations In addition to our core market making efforts, we intend to work on special projects that will help create an enabling ecosystem for the scalable growth of low income housing in India. These projects are pending funding from sponsors Sustainability Elements in Low Income Housing The creation of the low income housing market offers a rare opportunity to introduce a new set of environmentally sustainable elements in the market. If these elements are included in early projects that are commercially successful, they are likely to be replicated by future entrants in this space We have identified an initial set of feasible sustainability elements that are environmentally better than conventional practice without increasing cost. We would like to expand this list, quantify the benefit of these elements, include some of them in the new projects and propagate information about them. Developing a Paradigm for Low Income Rental Housing Facilitating Broader Market Making Innovations There is a clear need for more and better quality rental housing, and there may be a commercially viable opportunity to provide such housing We would like to understand the current living conditions of families such as recent migrants, young breadwinners etc. who cannot afford to buy homes of their own and their interest in rentals that the market can provide, regulatory issues, the potential of combining a rental model ownership housing, etc. This is likely to lead to a innovative models for rental housing and a clear articulation of a business opportunity which we could help implement and scale We are also interested in exploring broader market making efforts such as: Developing Architectural Benchmarks Developing Low Cost Construction Technologies Facilitating the flow of long-term and low-cost debt to the sector, including warehousing facilities and options for securitization Including Low Income Housing in SEZs Working with financial institutions to lower the cost of service for low income customers 20

Confidential Monitor Group: An Introduction Founded by renowned academics, the Monitor Group has grown rapidly to become a leading global management consulting and merchant banking firm Michael Porter, Harvard Business School Director and Co-Founder of the Monitor Group Founded by Michael Porter and other HBS faculty in 1983 Renowned for focus on strategy and cutting-edge ideas that help clients grow We believe that Ideas can create impact. With over 25 offices across the globe, we go the last mile Corporates Governments Non Profits Growth Strategies Leadership & Innovation Private Equity Funds City Strategies Cluster Development Country Competitiveness Social Venture Funds Impact Investing Education Ecosystem 21

Confidential Monitor Inclusive Markets in India An autonomous unit that is actively facilitating scaling of market based solutions Customers Developers Financial Institutions Construction Technology Identifying and refining business models at scale Making the market for low income housing in India 22

Urban Housing Market 2007 Smallest house costs ~ Rs. 5 Lakhs (~ USD 10,000) Confidential Multiple builders: Three room flats @ Rs 950 / sq. ft. Vatwa, 12 km from city centre; 40 minutes travel, Naroda Land rate of 80L to 1.1 Cr per acre available 45 minutes to 1 hour from city center, FSI of 1.8 given for 60% of the plot size Jaipur Potential to provide housing at Rs 800 Rs 1000 per sq.ft. However, overriding concern is financing of these houses Urban India Expenditure & Income Pyramid MHE: >Rs 9,625 pm MHE: Rs 4,575 Rs 9,625 pm 16% (10MM) 37% (~23MM) Monthly Income Rs. 11,000 USD 220 Ahmedabad / Vadodara Rs. 5,000 Mumbai Hyderabad MHE: Rs 2,500 Rs 4,575 pm 33% (~21MM) USD 100 1RK flat at Karjat, (Mumbai suburb) being sold at Rs 999 per sqft Land rate of 0.6-1.2 Cr per acre available in Titwala, FSI norm of 1 1BHK flats (450 500 sq. ft.) being sold at Rs 900 1,200 per sq. ft. in areas such as Uppal, L B Nagar, Kuthapet, Kukatpalli etc. but not on a large scale. MHE: <Rs 2,500 pm 14% (~9MM) LESS THAN TOP 16% of Urban Indian Households can afford to own houses Rs. 2,500 USD 50 Current segment served Source: NHB Trends in Housing; CRIS Infac Report; Monitor Research 23

The opportunity: Smaller houses using current private sector construction practices Confidential Cost Structure : Project IRR of 30 40% Project IRR 30-40% Rs 550-650 Rs 10-25 Rs 70-100 Rs 15 Operating Profitability Rs 25-60 Rs Rs. 200-300 1100-1400 250-400 sq ft. houses MHE: >Rs 9,625 pm MHE: Rs 4,575 Rs 9,625 pm Urban India Expenditure Pyramid 16% (10MM) 37% (~23MM) Monthly Income Rs. 11,000 USD 220 Rs. 5,000 Rs 25 Rs 150-250 Land & Legal Design Constructi on Costs Infrastruct Marketing ure Costs Salaries Interest PBT Total MHE: Rs 2,500 Rs 4,575 pm MHE: <Rs 2,500 pm 33% (~21MM) 14% (~9MM) USD 100 Rs. 2,500 USD 50 Target segment for this project Potential to provide housing for 15 21 Million urban households Source: NHB Trends in Housing; CRIS Infac Report; Monitor Research 24

Confidential Efficient Use of Space Sample Unit Layout 25

Interest in Housing: Focus Groups Household Income Rs. 6,700-7,700/month ($ 140) 26 Housing Concept 3 Tested with Respondents Area: Housing is within 1 hour of the city centre 4 Complex would comprise 6 buildings with 32 flats in each building (8 flats/ floor and 4 floors) Regular water and electricity No lifts and single set of staircases Complex would have a compound wall with shared open spaces including garden and play area for kids Close to primary, secondary schools, healthcare centre and market place Well connected to city by bus linkages Each flat would have a built up area of ~ 300 sq.ft. (large cities) or 400 sq. ft. (small cities) 1 BHK with an attached toilet and bathroom Well painted walls and well ventilated Rs 300 per month as maintenance charges All respondents were very interested in this concept Confidential Key is strong interest, proximity to facilities (e.g. schools, market places), connectivity via public transport and shared open spaces Maximum Affordable EMI Payments Maximum Affordable Housing Unit (Super Built Up) Customer Profile: Income: Rs. 7,000/month Maximum Affordable Down Payment Housing Loan Tenure 1 Current Rent (Large City) Current Average Savings Rs. 70,000 20 years Rs. 1,500 1,800 per month 2 Rs. 700 1,000 per month Rs. 2,450 / month (35% of monthly income) 292 sq ft Rs. 2,92,000 Note: 1 Interest rate assumed to be 12%; 2 Rent excludes electricity and water payments; 3 Price for lower-income segment housing estimated at Rs. 900/sq ft 3 Housing concept tested is based on examples of larger (400-500 sq. ft) flats constructed in cities like Ahmedabad; 4 The project team identified areas in the various cities where apartments could be constructed at property rates of Rs. 800-1,000 / sq. ft and these specific locations were tested with respondents

Low Income Segments as Target Market Untested Risk Profiles, different from Sub-prime in USA Confidential Sub-prime Experience in USA Very high LTV; creative structures developed to reduce EMIs Loans extended without due consideration to ability to pay (basis employment history) financing provided to those with questionable employment record Cost of asset disproportionately high compared to replacement cost; this is attributed to the real estate asset bubble in the US hence high risk of payment default Low-Income Housing in India 75-80% LTV significant individual contribution required; EMIs tend to be 35% of Monthly Income Target customers have regular employment, albeit with low income with an unproven credit record which needs to be tested In the low income segment, relatively low cost of land (esp. in peri-urban areas) leads to high correlation between cost of asset and replacement cost; and hence lower risk of asset bubbles Outcome: Sub-prime Defaults and Foreclosures Outcome: Untested, relatively low-risk segment with significant business potential 27

Low Income Housing as a Driver for Economic Growth Significant Employment Potential to Lower-Income Segments Within the construction industry which is the largest employers of labor in urban India, affordable housing emerges as the most labor-intensive providing high potential for employment opportunity to the urban poor Confidential Construction Laborer in India With 31 million workers (2005), the Construction Industry is the leading provider of employment to lower income segments in Urban India A typical construction worker is from states with lower economic development (U.P., Bihar), a daily wage earner (income of ~Rs 100 per day), resides in temporary settlement near construction site and has been badly hit by inflation and slowdown in construction industry 1,300 Capital 2 Comparison of spend on Labor in Construction Projects (as % of total Project Value) Traditional Housing Project 550 Raw Material 3 13% 400 Labor 750 Gross Margin 3,000 Total 250 Capital Low Income Housing Project 400 Raw Material 25% 300 Labor 250 Largest spend on labor Gross Margin 1,200 Total Note: 2 Includes land costs, design expenses and equipment costs; 3 Includes cost for steel, cement, tiles etc; Source: Construction Industry Development Council Report, Industry Experts, Monitor Analysis 28

Interviews with over 30 Housing Developers Interest in Low Income Housing Confidential Large private developers are not interested in the segment unless it facilitates access to additional land for high end projects while some medium / small private developers are interested in serving the segment provided they get sufficient volumes and financing is available for customers Large Private Developers Very limited interest in building housing for low income customers Developers believe that there is still a large opportunity in housing for middle income and higher income segments Recognize land as an extremely valuable resource and consider stand alone low income housing projects as sub optimal utilization of available land Not willing to compromise on profit margins Believe that it is difficult to make housing at price affordable for low income segment Interested in looking at housing for low income customers only if developing such housing helps them acquire land (from the government) for high end residential and commercial projects Willing to cross subsidize low income houses Medium and Small Private Developers Believe that there is high competition in the middle segments and market is saturating Some medium and small developers recognize the opportunity in low income housing are interested in looking at the segment Believe they have the management capabilities for taking on such additional projects Believe that it is viable to serve this segment while earning close to their current margins (20-30%) However, need comfort that they will get sufficient volumes from this segment; concerned about non availability of housing finance to the segment Some developers have also expressed interest in being part of a pilot project 29

Confidential Financial Institutions: Current Market Focus The target segment is largely un-served select medium sized HFCs and banks have a small presence among customers (primarily salaried) with household income above Rs. 5,000 per month Salaried (Organized) Self Employed & Salaried (Unorganized) > Rs. 10 K Large Private and Government Banks, Large Housing Finance Companies Banks typically treat the unorganized salaried segment as part of self employed Rs. 8K 10 K Large Private and Government Banks, NBFCs Select Medium Sized Housing Finance Companihes, Co-op Banks, NBFCs Target Segments for the Project Rs. 5K 8K 1 Rs. 3K 5K Rs. 2.5K 3K Government Banks, Medium Sized HFCs, Co-operative Banks, NBFCs (Select players, small % of portfolio) Limited MFIs (Home repair / extension loans) Shaded portion represents unserved customer segments Note: 1 Certain large private banks willing to look at salaried customers with income level down to Rs. 5,000 per month if there is proper documentation and sourcing / collection is done through third parties thereby managing the overall cost to serve the segment Source: Discussions with Industry Participants, Monitor Analysis 30

Confidential New Housing Business Model: Salaried Sector The new product for those employed in formal sector settings required several reconfigurations of existing products and practices, with a direct link to customer employers Current Bottom of the Market (12k 20k) Alternative Model Serves 6k 12k Market Developer (Small and Medium) No construction finance (concern on buyers / delays) Developer (Small and Medium) Construction Finance Employer Retention issues Uncertainty of Sales Sales and Mktg. costs Funding constraint Developer puts 500 sq.ft.+ apartments on market in phases (3 4 years) and gets individual, walk in customers Formal Sector Customers Financial Institution Serve 1 customer at a time, won t finance below Rs. 12,000/month Risk of Delays Employer Retention tool High productivity Affordable 200-350 sq ft units, good quality, no delays Payroll deduction Facilitates aggregation and information on customers Upfront, financed, aggregated customers Formal Sector Customers Financial Institution Aggregated low risk, low cost to serve customers Loans at affordable rates Opportunity to Set Standards: Architectural Design, Maintenance, Consumer Education 31

Confidential New Housing Business Model: Informal Sector The new product for those employed in informal sector settings may require the introduction of MFIs as an aggregator and potentially a credit guarantor to incentivize financing Current Bottom of the Market (12k 20k) Alternative Model Serves 6k 12k Market Developer (Small and Medium) No construction finance (concern on buyers / delays) Developer (Small and Medium) Construction Finance Credit Guarantee Uncertainty of Sales Sales and Mktg. costs Funding constraint Developer puts 500 sq.ft.+ apartments on market in phases (3 4 years) and gets individual, walk in customers Informal Sector Customers Financial Institution Risk of Delays Often will not finance Affordable 200-350 sq ft units, good quality, no delays Customers Upfront, financed, aggregated customers Aggregated customers Potentially low risk Low cost to serve Aggregated customers Use of tools such as rolling guarantee to reduce risk Credit check, collection, consumer education Financial Institution MFI Financial return with aligned incentives 32

Confidential Summary of Various Affordability Levers Various quantifiable affordability levers significantly differ from each other in terms of impact on affordability and feasibility Small Sized Houses Land Subsidy Feasibility FSI Increase Stamp Duty and Registration waiver on Land High Low Cost Construction Semi Finished Construction Bulk Material Purchase Subsidized Construction material Medium Tax Concessions 1 Income tax Exemption to Developer Stamp Duty Exemption to Customer Registration Fee s Waiver to Customer Low Longer Tenure Loan Interest Subsidy Note: 1 Sales Tax and Excise Duty Exemption ; The numbers in the graph represent the percent reduction of gap in affordability due to the lever Source: Discussions with Industry Participants, Monitor Analysis 33

Monitor s Value Proposition to Developers Support provided across the affordable housing value chain Business Blueprint Project implementation Sales and Marketing Business Planning and Organization Design Financing Land selection and validation Design and Developmen t Product mix and pricing Sales process design Training of client team Access to housing financing companies Development of business plan including strategy Organization design and structure Roles and responsibilities Identification of functions that can be outsourced/inhouse Project/Business Economics Access to targeted financing for specific projects Access to doublebottomline funds for investment at a business level Access to PE funds interested in investing in affordable housing Developing list of attractiveness criteria as well as inhibiting features to evaluate areas for determining buy decision Validation of selected land parcels Facilitating site visits by potential customers to determine attractiveness and demand. Databank of unit layouts (Lower cost and increase value to customer) Improve mix of commercial and residential to improve returns Databank of site layouts to incorporate open, green spaces, max FSI, etc.) Project phasing Developing optimal product mix given FSI norms and desired returns Differential product pricing Strategy to reach out to different sets of customers Building the sales process from the time a customer walks in to the project until the time possession is handed over to the customer. Templatize processes Structure team in order to achieve long term competencies in selling Train team to be able to do this at scale across projects Work with banks, MFIs and specialized institutions to enable access to financing options for customers at booking stage Tie-ups with financial institutions for both formal and informal sector customers Sensitivities of plan to approval process, construction costs and time, sales efficiencies, etc Access to Monitor Networks End-to-end handholding : Base IP and customized application; Decision support and overall knowledge