Nevada Public Land Management Task Force Final Report, SJR 1 of the 78 th Nevada Legislature and Implementation through Federal Legislation

Similar documents
Nevada Land Management Task Force Established Pursuant to Assembly Bill 227 enacted in the 2013 Legislative Session

Pursuant to AB 227 of the 2013 Nevada Legislative Session. July 18, $TEM#2c

Decades of dysfunctional federal bureaucracy is literally dismantling the environmental well being of Nevada and the West.

APPENDIX C. Summary of Formal Presentations to the Nevada Land Management Task

Utah Trust Lands & Education Funding

Utah Trust Lands & Education Funding

February 2, 2012 BOARD MATTER C - 1 WYOMING LAND AND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, PROPOSAL TO ACQUIRE REAL PROPERTY IN ALBANY COUNTY, WYOMING

How Could Your Recreational Access Change if Federal Lands were Controlled by the States?

. Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act: Operation and Issues for Congress Carol Hardy Vincent Specialist in Natural Resources Policy June 13, 201

On April 25, 2014, the Nevada Land Management Task force met in the Nevada Association of Counties office in Carson City.

A Presentation to the. Wyoming Solid Waste and Recycling Association (WSWRA) 2016 Annual Conference Agenda

CHALLENGES IN MANAGING MULTIPLE USE LANDS & TOOLS TO ENABLE SUCCESS

H. Trust Lands Management in Utah

Basic Facts Claim-Patent System Leasing System General Patterns

Exploring Ecosystem Services on State Trust Lands in the West

Lincoln County Conservation, Recreation and Development Act of 2004

Washoe Public Lands Management Act TITLE I FEDERAL LAND DISPOSAL

Public Law th Congress An Act

Claudia Stuart, Williamson Act Program Manager and Nick Hernandez, Planning Intern

February 12, 2009 BOARD MATTER H 2 CHASE FARMS SALE PROPOSAL IN SHERIDAN COUNTY, WYOMING

PUBLIC LANDS. NACo American County Platform and Resolutions

Legislative Counsel Bureau. Public Lands BULLETIN NO. 15-7

Measuring the Scope of Federal Land Ownership

NEVADA NATIVE NATIONS LAND ACT

APPROPRIATIONS Congress should prohibit agencies from expending any funds for:

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST

December 21, The specific provisions of P.L that apply solely to the CDCA are:

Summary of State Trust Land Revenue

STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF EDDY ORDINANCE NO: 41 LAND USE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR FEDERAL, STATE AND COUNTY

U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management

Justification Review. State Lands Program. Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability

The Ironwood proclamation includes the same language and similar language is provided in the Military Lands Withdrawal Act of 1999, which states:

Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests Region 2, USDA Forest Service

Review of Idaho s Forest Legacy Program

A Profile of Federal Land Payments

Lands and Minerals. Lands and Minerals. Director Jess Richards

Lead Agency: USDA Forest Service Santa Fe National Forest P.O. Box 3307 Española NM 87533

The Bureau of Land Management and Mineral Development

US Code (Unofficial compilation from the Legal Information Institute) TITLE 43 - PUBLIC LANDS CHAPTER 37 PUBLIC RANGELANDS IMPROVEMENT

DETAILED ANALYSIS. Wyoming Board of Land Commissioners. Consideration for Disposal of State Trust Land. Prepared on July 11, 2014

STATE LAND OFFICE Schedule of Fees

[15X L1109AF LLUTW L FR0000; UTU A] Notice of Realty Action; Recreation and Public Purposes Act Classification for

[15XL LLIDI02000.L EO0000. LVTFD A ; IDI- Notice of Intent to Amend the Pocatello Resource Management Plan and Notice of

STATEMENT OF BASIC PHILOSOPHY

Presentation to AZ Ch., American Soc. of Farm Managers & Rural Appraisers Feb 2017

PUBLIC GRAZING IN THE WEST: THE IMPACT OF RANGELAND REFORM 94

CONSERVATION EASEMENTS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

LINCOLN COUNTY CONSERVATION, RECREATION, AND DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 2004

CLACKAMAS COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. Policy Session Worksheet. Presentation Date: September 25, 2018 Time: 11:00 AM Length: 30 min.

Board of County Commissioners

STATE LAND OFFICE Schedule of Fees

to NMSA 1978 Updated 2013 ARTICLE 6 Sale of Public Property Section Disposition of obsolete, worn out or

SEC MINERAL DEVELOPMENT LANDS AVAILABLE FOR PURCHASE.

Section 4(f) Why don t we build the road through this green space over here?

Mining on Federal Lands: Hardrock Minerals Summary Mining of hardrock minerals on federal lands is governed primarily by the General Mining Law of 187

Seneca Resources Corporation. Comments on Senate Bill 258

Appendix A Major Federal, State, and Local Permits or Approvals

CONSERVATION EASEMENTS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

CHAPTER 3: IDENTIFYING SECTION 4(f) PROPERTIES

Record of Decision Mt. Hood National Forest Geothermal Leases August Record of Decision. Mt. Hood National Forest Geothermal Leases

State Land Boards, the Public Trust and Good Planning Can they Coexist? 1:30 p.m. 2:40 p.m. Friday, April 22, 2005 Sturm College of Law

CHAPTER 12. BE IT ENACTED by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:

EMERY COUNTY PUBLIC LAND MANAGEMENT ACT OF 2017

SEQRA (For Land Surveyors) Purpose of this Presentation

LAKE POWELL PIPELINE DEVELOPMENT ACT Passed by 2006 Utah State Legislature

State Trust Lands in the West

ESP 172: Public Land Management. Professor Mark Lubell TA Rodd Kelsey

Forest Service Role CHAPTER 2

S.J. QUINNEY COLLEGE OF LAW

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

Arizona s State Trust Land

New Mexico State Land Office 2015 Annual Report. Aubrey Dunn New Mexico State Land Commissioner

Title 5: ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND SERVICES

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 SESSION LAW HOUSE BILL 436

Annual Report

( ) Ordinance. Environmental Resources Management

SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. Managing Division / Dept: Office of Management & Budget

Chapter SWAINSON S HAWK IMPACT MITIGATION FEES

FOREST SERVICE HANDBOOK NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS (WO) WASHINGTON, DC

WikiLeaks Document Release

3.23 LANDS AND SPECIAL USES

Chapter VIII. Conservation Easements: Valuing Property Subject to a Qualified Conservation Contribution

Oregon Trust Lands & Education Funding

Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and Opportunity for Public Meeting; Arizona. SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Interior proposes to withdraw approximately

Representative Dan Fabian Chair, House Environment and Natural Resources Policy and Finance Committee 359 State Office Building Saint Paul, MN 55155

FROM PREFERENCE RIGHTS TO GRAZING ALLOTMENTS: WHY RANCHERS OWN THEIR ALLOTMENTS

Property Tax Overview. Budget, Finance, & Audit Committee January 3, 2017

Funding Economic Development in Nevada: Special Assessment Districts

Bureau of Land Management

3 Federal Laws Affecting Access

Christian C. Sizemore, Land Lead Newfield Exploration Company

ARIZONA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 949 East Second Street Library and Archives Tucson, AZ (520)

Lessard Sams Outdoor Heritage Council

8. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE

MARCH 19, Referred to Committee on Government Affairs

State Trust Lands in Arizona: A Primer JANUARY 21, 2016

Land Asset Management: Metro Area Land Exchange Project Summary School Trust Benefits Project Strategy A.

WORK SESSION DOCUMENT

RENITA HURDSMAN BEAR RIVER STATE PARK LAND EXCHANGE PROPOSAL

SPECIAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Transcription:

Nevada Public Land Management Task Force Final Report, SJR 1 of the 78 th Nevada Legislature and Implementation through Federal Legislation Churchill County Public Meeting Churchill County Commission Chamber Fallon, Nevada Mike Baughman, PhD, CEcD President Intertech Services Corporation January 18, 2017

Nevada s economy is constrained by limited state and private owned land 2

3

AB 227, passed in the 2013 Session of the Nevada Legislature, established the Nevada Land Management Task Force Seventeen member Task Force is comprised of one county commissioner from each Nevada county Task Force required to produce a study specifically covering three main things: an economic analysis including costs and revenues associated with transferring federal lands to the State of Nevada a proposed plan for the administration and management of any lands transferred an identification of the lands that Task Force determines would be included in any potential transfer The Task Force presented its Final Report and Recommendations to the Legislative Interim Committee on Public Lands August 1, 2014. Task Force Background 4

Lands to be Excluded from Transfer Current Congressionally designated wilderness areas National Conservation Areas Lands currently administered by: Department of Energy Department of Defense Department of Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs Department of the Interior U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service Department of the Interior National Park Service Areas of Critical Environmental Concern designated by BLM to protect the desert tortoise Key Task Force Recommendations 5

Lands to be Transferred in Phase I Description BLM Checkerboard 4,230,600 Identified by BLM as Suitable for Disposal Estimated Acreage 1,000,000 Existing BLM R&PP Leases 200,000 Existing BLM ROW Grants 255,000 BLM Split Estate 300,000 BLM Designated Solar Energy Zones 60,395 Existing BLM Geothermal Leases 1,045,079 Approved and Proposed Congressional Transfers of BLM Land 250,000 Total Estimated Phase I Acreage 7,281,074 Key Task Force Recommendations 6

BLM Checkerboard Lands 7

The checkerboard land pattern is difficult to manage for both the private land owners as well as the BLM. There are no United State Forest Service (USFS) lands within the checkerboard, which minimizes the number of federal agencies to be dealt with. There are no federally designated wilderness areas or wilderness study areas within the checkerboard land pattern. There are few wild horse management areas within the checkerboard land pattern. The Union Pacific Railroad mainline, Interstate 80, U.S. 95, and U.S. 93 transportation corridors lie within the checkerboard land pattern. There are an estimated 233,600 acres of BLM administered checkerboard land within Churchill County Why BLM Checkerboard Lands are Logical First Step 8

Five Year Observed High, Observed Low and Average Net Revenue and FTEs for Arizona, Idaho, New Mexico and Utah State Trust Land Management (2008-2012) 5-Yr. Observed High 5-Yr. Observed Low 5 Yr. Average Net Revenue $639,11,910 $25,591,016 $223,111,851 Total Acres Managed 9,302,255 2,449,255 6,021,441 Revenue/Acre $72.40 $16.78 $36.79 Expense/Acre $9.00 $1.45 $3.73 Net Revenue/Acre $72.26 $10.00 $28.59 Acres Managed/FTE 74,616 9,266 44,275 9

Beneficiary Amount Received Common Schools (K-12) $544,244,931 University of New Mexico $9,9482,298 New Mexico State University $2,955,919 New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology $1,558,074 New Mexico Military Institute $23,094,438 Miner s Hospital $7,401,699 Behavioral Institute $2,986,671 State Penitentiary $11,416,378 School for the Deaf $11,635,495 School for the Visually Impaired $11,613,393 Water Reservoirs $7,278,813 Distribution of Net Revenues Derived from New Mexico State Trust Lands: Selected Beneficiaries (2012) 10

Estimated Net Revenue from Expanded State Land Ownership in Nevada Using Four Other State Models Net Revenue Per Acre Total Net Revenue Assuming 7.2 Million Acres of BLM Land Transferred to Nevada Total Net Revenue Assuming 45 Million Acres of BLM Land Transferred to Nevada Four State Avg. Net Revenue/Acre Model $28.59 $205,848,000 $1,286,550,000 Four State Low Observed Net Revenue ($16.78) and High ($9.00) Observed Expense/Acre Model $7.78 $56,016,000 $350,100,000 1 1/ While an expanded state land base in Nevada would likely contain mineralized areas and potential for fossil fuel production, the likelihood that such resources would be located within most of the nearly 48 million acres now administered by BLM is not great. As a consequence, a significant (yet admittedly unknown) portion of the public lands in Nevada would not have the potential to generate net revenues of the magnitude observed for other states considered in this study. 11

FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 5-Yr. Avg. Revenue Non-ONRR $47,456,580 $27,170,048 $26,463,030 $23,882,418 $25,114,972 $30,017,409 ONRR Revenue $30,717,807 $39,683,895 $26,151,969 $17,281,366 $20,891,112 $26,945,229 Total Revenue $78,174,387 $66,853,943 $52,614,999 $41,163,784 $46,006,084 $56,962,639 Expense n/a $97,657,000 $109,657,000 $108,379,000 $108,142,000 $105,958,750 Net Revenue n/a -$30,803,057 -$57,042,001 -$67,215,216 -$62,135,916 -$54,299,047 Total Acres Managed 47,808,114 47,806,738 47,805,923 47,7940,96 47,783,458 47,799,665 Revenue Per Acre Managed $1.64 $1.40 $1.10 $0.86 $0.96 $1.19 Expense Per Acre Managed n/a $2.04 $2.29 $2.27 $2.26 $2.22 Net Revenue Per Acre Managed n/a -$0.64 -$1.19 -$1.40 -$1.30 -$1.03 Total FTEs 697 701 755 786 790 745 Acres Managed Per FTE 68,591 68,198 63,319 60,806 60,485 64,279 Grazing Revenue $1,736,900 $1,718,401 $1,713,409 $1,937,754 $1,886,517 $1,798,596 No. of Grazing Authorizations 516 555 536 570 555 546 AUMs Authorized 1,133,094 1,138,147 1,138,171 1,333,346 1,291,610 1,206,873 Price per AUM $1.35 $1.35 $1.35 $1.35 $1.35 $1.35 Timber Revenue $22,405 $30,665 $29,078 $26,581 $27,267 $27,199 Oil, Gas and Geothermal Lease Revenue (BLM) $1,245,616 $167,828 $642,010 -$174,777 $1,039,054 $583,946 Sale of Land and Minerals (SNPLMA sales Included) $35,120,737 $14,520,137 $14,795,398 $9,702,808 $10,649,922 $16,957,800 Fees and Commissions $3,560 $2,577 $2,998 $2,314 $1,302 $2,550 Rights of Way Rent $5,398,217 $7,030,419 $6,322,440 $7,461,663 $7,742,420 $6,791,031 Rent of Land $1,155,870 $1,165,915 $213,145 $1,034,525 $118,502 $737,591 Recreation Fees $2,743,664 $2,530,780 $2,741,286 $3,874,883 $3,641,559 $3,106,434 Other Revenue $29,611 $3,326 $3,266 $16,667 $8,429 $12,259 Sources: ONRR Revenue date from Department of Interior, Office of Natural Resources Revenue, Annual Revenue Reports, 2008-2012; Expense and FTE data from BLM Nevada State Office, correspondence dated February 18, 2014 from Robert M. Scruggs, Deputy State Director, Support Services, response to FOIA request; all other data from U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Public Land Statistics, annual reports 2008 2012. BLM Nevada Revenues and Expenditures 12

The following will be transferred from the federal government to the State of Nevada: Surface estate Subsurface estate Federally held water rights appurtenant to transferred lands The following lands should be considered for transfer from the federal government to the State of Nevada in subsequent phases: Other BLM administered lands United States Forest Service lands Lands deemed to be surplus by the Bureau of Reclamation Other federally managed and administered lands Key Task Force Recommendations 13

The transferred lands will be held by the State of Nevada in trust and managed for long-term sustainable net revenue maximization for the following beneficiaries: Public K-12 education Public higher education Public specialized education (schools for deaf and blind) Public mental health services Public medical services Public programs for candidate and listed threatened or endangered species recovery plan development and implementation Local government to mitigate the loss of PILT, at minimum Key Task Force Recommendations 14

The following principals will guide State management of transferred lands: All transferred land subject to applicable State and local statutes, regulations, ordinances, and codes All transferred land subject to valid existing federal, state, and local permits; land use authorizations; rights of access and property rights Administration and management, including disposal, of transferred land by the State of Nevada subject to review by the governing board of local government(s) within which land to be disposed of is located for consistency with master plans, ordinances and land use policies. Costs incurred by the State of Nevada to administer land transferred to the State to be covered by gross revenue derived from managing said land Key Task Force Recommendations 15

Nevada State and Local Permitting Capacity: No Additional NEPA or CEQA-Like Needed 16

No General Fund Expenditures to Manage Transferred Lands Portion of Transferred Lands Collateralized Short to Intermediate Term Debt for Land Management Startup Capital Four-State, Five-Year Average Expense Per Acre of $3.73 Estimated First Year Expense for 7.2 Million Acres Estimated at $26,856,000 (includes $2,304,000 for wildfire suppression) First Year Sale of Select Parcels to Generate Start-up Capital and Repay Debt First Year Sale of 30,000 Acres at Assumed $1,000/acre Yielding $30 Million Plus Other On-Going Revenues (rents, royalties, fees, etc.) Land sales in Las Vegas Valley and Reno-Sparks areas would likely result in higher values per acre. Preliminary Business Plan Concepts 17

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) today (11/30/2016) sold 135 acres in 12 parcels for $24,903,000 during a competitive public land sale. The agency offered 182.93 acres, in 16 parcels, under the Southern Nevada Public Land Management Act (SNPLMA). Parcels offered for sale varied in size from 1.25 to 37.5 acres and were located in the Las Vegas Valley. Source: https://www.blm.gov/press-release/land-sale-generates-almost-25-million-projects Carson City District Office has identified 76,900 acres suitable for disposal in Churchill County in the November 2014 Draft Resource Management Plan BLM Land Sales 18

2006-2015 BLM Nevada Wildfire Statistics Average annual acres burned is 212,629 or.44% of 47.8 million acres of BLM land in Nevada.44% of 7,200,000 acres is 31,680 acres of lands transferred to Nevada in Phase 1 Based on Nevada Division of Forestry wildfire cost data, wildfire protection and suppression cost for transferred lands budgeted at $0.32 per acre owned or $2,304,000 per year for 7,200,000 acres Task Force Considered Costs of Wildfire Suppression 19

Urges Congress to enact legislation transferring title to certain public lands to the State of Nevada in accordance with the report prepared by the Nevada Land Management Task Force SJR 1 includes all recommendations of the Nevada Land Management Task Force presented to the Legislature s Interim Committee on Public Lands SJR 1 Passed the 78 th Nevada Legislature Overview of SJR 1 20

H.R. 1484, Honor the Nevada Enabling Act of 1864 Act, introduced into 114 th Congress by Congressman Amodei Phase I 7.2 million acres to State of Nevada Phase II Balance of non-exempt federal lands transferred to State of Nevada within 10 years Proposed legislation to be introduced into 115 th Congress Phase I 7.2 million acres to State of Nevada Reports to Congress submitted by State of Nevada every fours years for 20 years following Phase I transfer Identify lands conveyed to date Describe annual State revenues and expenses in managing conveyed lands Include recommendation by Board of Examiners for additional federal lands to be conveyed to the State Recognition by State of all valid existing rights and uses on, permits for and public access to the conveyed lands Federal Legislation 21

Private 12.2 Current State 0.2 After Phase 1 Private 12.2 State 10.3 Federal 87.6 Federal 77.4 Nevada Land Status 22

Copies of all Task Force materials including the full July 18, 2014 final Task Force report entitled, Congressional Transfer of Public Lands to the State of Nevada: A Report of the Nevada Land Management Task Force to the Legislative Committee on Public Lands, can be viewed at the Nevada Association of Counties website under the following Nevada Land Management Task Force link: http://www.nvnaco.org/images//final%20nv%20land%20mgmn t%20task%20force%20report%20%28print%20version%29.p df SJR 1 can be viewed at: https://www.leg.state.nv.us/session/78th2015/bills/sjr/sjr1.pdf For Additional Information 23