Heights in Residential Zoning Districts Stakeholders Meeting September 17, 2009

Similar documents
HEIGHTS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

HEIGHTS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS PLANNING AND ZONING 101 EDUCATION SESSION

We contacted all RNOs in the area to come to their meetings and personally explain the draft, and take questions. Four RNOs took us up on the offer,

TABLE (A): TABLE OF DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICTS REQUIRED YARDS [4], [5] SIDE YARD (FT) REAR YARD (FT) R-1 DISTRICT

PEDESTRIAN OVERLAY DISTRICT. November 6, 2013 Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing Steering Committee Meeting #2

The Planning Commission. DATE: July 19, 2016

MONROE WARD REZONING SUMMARY. October 2018

Indicates Council-recommended changes Introduced by: Mr. Tackett Date of introduction: June 14, 2016 SUBSTITUTE NO. 1 TO ORDINANCE NO.

Amendment to Subdistrict 6, the Davis Corridor, within Planned Development District No. 830

ZONING ORDINANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Thursday, April 27, 2017 DALLAS DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT FILE NO. DCA

MPC STAFF REPORT REZONING MAP AMENDMENT ALDERMANIC DISTRICT 1 COUNTY COMMISSION DISTRICT 5 April 3, 2013 MPC FILE NUMBER.

Accessory Dwelling Units

ORDINANCE NO

Community Development Department City of Pismo Beach 760 Mattie Road Pismo Beach, CA Telephone: (805) / Fax: (805)

CLEARFIELD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AND SUMMARY REPORT July 31, 2018 SPECIAL POLICY SESSION

PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT. For Planning Commission Meeting of May 6, 2014

BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-20 Habitat for Humanity Evans Road Town Council Meeting October 16, 2014

UDO Advisory Committee Meeting #3 August 18, 2011

3804 Wilson Boulevard (Staples Site) Special General Land Use Plan Study

Metropolitan Planning Commission. DATE: April 5, 2016

WELCOME! Please start here

For Sale 50 SOUTH QUEEN STREET MAYTOWN, PA Industrial/Commercial Realtors

CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action

SUBJECT: Character Area Studies and Site Plan Approval for Low Density Residential Areas. Community and Corporate Services Committee

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

2. Rezone a portion of the lot from R2 (Small Lot Residential) to RD2 (Duplex: Housing Lane).

Triangle Special Planning Area Update. Community Workshop #5 September 17, 2018

"ARTICLE - VINE STREET TRANSITIONAL (VST) DISTRICT

THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA

City Avenue District Rezoning. Regional Center Area & Bala Cynwyd Retail District December 14, 2011 Public Hearing

Appendix C Built Form Guidelines

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015

4/27/2017. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) Zoning Ordinance Amendments Planning Commission April 27, 2017

Voluntary Inclusionary Zoning

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Surrey, in open meeting assembled, ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

Planning and Building Department

City of Charlotte. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Government Center 600 East 4th Street Charlotte, NC Zoning Agenda. Monday, December 14, 2015

3.1 Existing Built Form

Overview. Review Zoning Rewrite Project Zoning Ordinance Subdivision Ordinance

PD No. 15 Authorized Hearing

1. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA THAT the Commission adopts the agenda for the January 17, 2018 meeting of the Advisory Planning Commission.

Toronto and East York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

SUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard

Accessory Dwelling Units

Charlotte L. Moore, AICP, MPC Project Planner

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to amend Surrey Zoning By-law, 1993, No , as amended...

Residential - Mixed Housing Urban and Suburban zones

836 St Clair Ave W - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

The Planning and Zoning Commission also recommended a building height of 58 with these added mitigating measures.

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

ORDINANCE NO BOROUGH OF PHOENIXVILLE CHESTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

4.13 RM7 and RM8 ZONES (DETACHED, SEMI-DETACHED, DUPLEX, TRIPLEX AND HORIZONTAL MULTIPLE DWELLINGS WITH 4 TO 6 DWELLING UNITS)

MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Travis Parker, Planning Director DATE: April 4, 2018 Lakewood Zoning Amendments Housing and Mixed Use

Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts

*as amended Dec. 5, 2018

Pennsbury Professional Center 201 Woolston Drive Morrisville, PA

Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1

Goal 1 - Retain and enhance Cherry Creek North s unique physical character.

PUD Zoning Framework

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-24 Indian Wells Road Properties Town Council Meeting November 20, 2014

Site Context 2.1. Site Context

LIN AVE The applicant is proposing to construct a four-unit Lot A R.P

RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES

CITY OF TYLER CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION

STAFF REPORT. September 25, City Council. Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

Memo to the Planning Commission HEARING DATE: APRIL 21, 2016 Closed Session

Text Amendment July 29, Charlotte - Mecklenburg Planning Department

AGENDA COMMITTEE OPENING OF. use. given the. by staff. CHAIRPERSON DALLAS BAKER CITY PLANNER OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS CHIEF BUILDING

Monaco Investments Partnership December 7, 2017

PACE LAW SCHOOL LAND USE & SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE

50 and 52 Neptune Drive Rezoning Preliminary Report

Fountain District Urban Village

66 Isabella Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

Zoning Most Frequently Asked Questions

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report. 956 W. Chatham Street. Town Council Meeting January 9, 2014

CITY AND BOROUGH OF SITKA PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VARIANCES

50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Lot 1 KAP Lot 1. Lot 1. Lot 4. ot 5

LUXURY MARKET REPORT. - March

Voluntary Inclusionary Zoning

The Corporation of Delta COUNCIL REPORT Regular Meeting

Implementing Pre-Application Neighborhood Meetings in Prince George s County A Discussion Paper

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses

6040 Bathurst Street and 5 Fisherville Road Zoning Bylaw Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013

Agenda Report TO: CITY COUNCIL DATE: NOVEMBER 21, 2005 FROM: CITY MANAGER

Unified Development Ordinance. Chamblee Chamber of Commerce Meeting May 21, 2015

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

City of Vancouver Planning By-law Administration Bulletins

Planning Department Priorities. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Commission 2015 Retreat

PLAN COMMISSION Wednesday, August 30, 2017

The Zoning Committee voted 4-2 to APPROVE this petition.

STAFF REPORT PLN September 11, 2017

Transcription:

Heights in Residential Zoning Districts Stakeholders Meeting September 17, 2009

TONIGHT S AGENDA Recap Ground Rules and Process Final Product Minority Opinion Background Information - Case That Brought Us Here Summary of Stakeholders Issues Height Regulations In Other Jurisdictions Standards For Group Discussion Break Group Discussion Next Steps

Ground Rules Treat each other with respect Be concise, not repetitive Express disagreement, without being disagreeable Offer solutions Follow through on commitments Share information with those you represent Speak one at a time Participate, but do not dominate Do your homework

PROJECT BACKGROUND 2001 Queens Road October 31, 2007 The first development proposal for 2100 Queens is submitted for permit review. These development plans indicated a 19 unit, 11-story residential building. November 13, 2007 The Myers Park Homeowners Association files rezoning petition #2008-032 to rezone the 2100 Queens site along with approximately 40 other acres within Myers Park from R-22MF to R-8MF. The height regulations are the same but hoped to reduce the height ht by reducing the maximum number of units allowed.

PROJECT BACKGROUND January 17, 2008 - The Boulevard Company sent a letter requesting the City to withhold the approval of the first development proposal for 2100 Queens. July 25, 2008 The Boulevard Company files rezoning petition #2008-134 to rezone the 2100 Queens site from R-22MF to UR-3(CD). The rezoning would increase the number of units allowed from 19 to 42 and commit to a height limit of 90 feet.

PROJECT BACKGROUND November 17, 2008 City Council denied the Boulevard Companies rezoning petition #2008-134. March 26, 2009 The second development proposal for 2100 Queens is submitted for permit review. These plans were approved on June 11, 2009 for a 19 unit, 63 foot tall residential building.

PROJECT BACKGROUND July 20, 2009 At the public hearing for the Myers Park rezoning petition #2008-032, City Council directed staff to provide alternate ways to address the height issue other than through rezoning. Staff has developed a process and formed a stakeholders group to study height in residential districts.

SUMMARY OF STAKEHOLDER ISSUES Different Requirements for Different Uses Adjacent Uses and Properties Road Classification Oh Other

Different Requirements for Different Uses There Are No Maximum Heights There Are No Maximum Heights Needed Institutional Uses Should Have Different Reg. Exceptions To Heights Reg. Should Be Revised Should Be Different Heights For MF & SF Should Be Some Transition For Different Uses and Districts

Consider Adjacent Uses and Properties Scale Should Be Relative To Neighborhood Be Aware Of Nearby Zoning Character Of A Neighborhood Should Be Considered Should Not Just Consider Adjacent/Abutting Properties But Also Proximity To Other Residences

Consider Road Classification For Major Corridors There Should Be Different Height Regulations Street Widths Should Be Considered Development Near Transit Corridors Should Have Different Regulations

Other Factor In All Ordinances Buildings Shadow Regulations Should Be Strengthen Density Needs To Be Balanced With Height Ratios Need Revising Setback-Proportional To Height Value/Affordability Of A Property Should Not Be Considered Light And Air Health Effects Should Be Considered Consider Sustainability And Carbon Footprint

REQUIREMENTS IN OTHER DISTRICTS Municipality Single Family Max. Height Multi-Family Max. Height Exceptions Austin, TX 35 Feet MF-1 thru 3: 40 Feet MF-4 & 5: 60 Feet MF-6: 90 Feet SF-Increase distance from front setback by 10 feet for each foot increase in height. May exceed a max of 20% for HVAC, towers, etc. Baltimore, MD 35 Feet 40 Feet MF- increase height only by specific cases authorized by the Mayor and/or City Council. Dallas, TX 36 Feet 90 Feet MF- Additional side and rear yard setback of 1 foot for each two feet in height is required for portion of structure above 45 feet.

Municipality Single Family Max. Height REQUIREMENTS IN OTHER DISTRICTS Multi-Family Max. Height Exceptions Jacksonville, FL 35 Feet High Density A: 45 MF- 1 to 1 ratio for Feet High Density B: 60 Feet all yards to increase height with no limit. Nashville, TN 3 Stories RM2-15: 20 Feet RM20: 30 Feet RM40: 45 Feet RM60: 60 Feet Phoenix, AZ MF-2 to 1 ratio using height plane (Vertical to Horizontal) ontal) form building setback. 30 Feet or 2 story Max. 40 Feet or 3 stories 48 Feet or 4 stories 1 to 5 ratio from the building setback to increase height.

REQUIREMENTS IN OTHER DISTRICTS Municipality Single Family Max. Height Multi-Family Max. Height Exceptions Raleigh, NC 40 Feet 40 Feet One foot of additional height for every one foot of additional setback. Richmond, VA 35 Feet 35 Feet MF- Higher 60 Feet: if on a min of 2 acres. Densities must meet extra conditions.

WHAT IS THE ISSUE WITH HEIGHT? What is the issue with a building exceeding the maximum building height? The Building Is Too Tall No Matter Where It Is Located? or The Building Is Too Close To Single Family To Be So Tall?

Single Family Adjacent to Single Family

Multi Family Adjacent to Single Family

Multi Family Adjacent to Single Family

Scale and Mass

STANDARDS FOR GROUP DISCUSSION Decrease Single Family Max Height to 35 TOD Height Regulation

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT The base height for all TOD districts shall be 40 feet. The maximum height for all TOD districts shall be The maximum height for all TOD districts shall be 120 feet.

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT For new development across a local (public or private) street from existing single family zoning (R-3, R-4, R-5, R-6, and R-8), the 40 base height shall be measured at the minimum setback line. The height may increase one foot in height, over 40 feet, for every 10 feet in distance the portion of the building is from the required setback along that street.

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT For new development abutting on the same side of a local (public or private) street as existing single family zoning (R-3, R-4, R-5, R-6, and R- 8), the 40 base height shall be measured at the required yard. The height may increase one foot in height, over 40 feet, for every 10 feet in distance the portion of the building is from the required yard.

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT

MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT For all other parcels, the permitted maximum height shall be determined by the distance from the structure to the boundary line of the nearest single-family residential district (R-3, R-4, R-5, R-6, and R-8). This distance shall be the shortest measurable distance between the building footprint edges and nearby single- family residential district boundaries. Height increases for portions of the building that are a further distance from single-family residential zoning districts, are allowed at a rate of one additional foot of height for every 10 feet of additional distance the portion of the building is from the edges of nearby single-family zoning districts.

Multi-Family Adjacent to Single Family 10:1

GROUP BREAK OUT SESSION Discussion Topic: Discuss Presented Standards

Feedback from Groups GROUP FEEDBACK

NEXT STEPS Next meeting is October 1 st at 6 pm Summary minutes from meeting and other information will be posted on website TONIGHT S HOMEWORK: Submit any additional alternatives to kjyoung@charlottenc.gov prior to next meeting.

MORE INFORMATION Please visit our website at charlotteplanning.org Agendas Updates Summary Minutes PowerPoint Presentations