Seoul BRT. - Innovative system of meeting the travel demand - KWON, Young Jong (The 5 th EST Forum in Bangkok)

Similar documents
Dr. Pawan Kumar, Associate T&CP

DRAFT. Transit Oriented Development Design Guidelines. Introduction. Path Forward

The Role of Transit in Equitable Housing

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement

PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTING TOD: KEY FACTORS FOR SUCCESS. Sujata Srivastava Knowledge Corridor TOD Workshop June 5, 2013

METRO BOARD OF DIRECTORS REAL ESTATE WORKING COMMITTEE MEETING AUGUST 20, :30 PM

Financing Municipal Services for Sustainable Development Getting the Prices Right

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 904

TOD: Types of Capital Investment

From Policy to Reality

Urban Mobility India 2012 New Delhi. Dr. Adnan Rahman. December, Transportation leadership you can trust.

2014 National Territorial and Regional Development Policy Course for Sustainable Development of the Three Emerging Countries.

Korea Real Estate Market Report

Measuring the Quality of Transport Infrastructure and Housing Conditions in Hong Kong

Major Transport Scheme Appraisal An Overview

Parallel Lines : Railway Infrastructure Development and its interaction with Urban Growth in Hong Kong

Prospect of Using Rail-Plus-Property Model for Transit Financing in China: Based on Comparative Case Studies of Shenzhen and Hong Kong

Appendix : Housing Policy

Land Use Impacts of BRT

2014 Charleston Tri-County Region

Parking Assessment Proposed Mixed-Use Residential Development. 177 Cross Avenue Town of Oakville. Prepared For: Ontario Inc.

Case Study: Tokyu Corporation

Transit Oriented Development - Trip Generation & Mode Split in the Portland Metropolitan Region

CONCEPT DESIGN STUDY STAGE ENVELOPE EXTENSION 13 JULY Commerce and Creativity on a Whole New Level.

CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL For the meeting of January 23, 2018 Originating Department: City Attorney/City Manager

I-405 Bus Rapid Transit

Public Private Partnership in Railway. -A success story in Hong Kong-

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority. Metro s Joint Development Completed Projects

Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

Urbanization. Urbanization in Chindia -- India Struggles with the Next 500 Million. Asian Experience with Compact Growth

Penny Wise, Pound Fuelish:

Proposed Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

Estimating User Accessibility Benefits with a Housing Sales Hedonic Model

PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

Suburban Sprawl: Exposing Hidden Costs, Identifying Innovations. Summary

100% LEASED INVESTMENT

CTBUH Copyright. The Remaking of Mumbai in the Sustainable Age. Mr. Ratnakar Gaikwad

To achieve growth, property development, redevelopment and an improved tax base in the cities and boroughs in the Lehigh Valley.

CONNECTING ARLINGTON S POLICY FRAMEWORK TO THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING WORKING GROUP

A vibrant and livable community at the center of RVA s Midtown area. Libbie Mill - Midtown

Downtown Plano. Creating a Transit Village

Center for the Study of Economics South 10th Street Philadelphia, PA

Route 6 Corridor Study Bristol Planning Commission Meeting #1. May 25, 2016 FITZGERALD & HALLIDAY, INC. Innovative Planning, Better Communities

Twin Cities Region Equitable Development Principles & Scorecard

Fountain District Urban Village

SECTION I - INTRODUCTION

Lakeview - Chicago TOD OPPORTUNITY NEAR TWO BROWN LINES N. Lincoln Ave N. Lincoln Ave. & 1713 W. Cornelia Ave.

RESEARCH ON PROPERTY VALUES AND RAIL TRANSIT

NC 54/I-40 Corridor Master Plan Draft Land Use Blueprint

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

Behavioral Impact of the Financing Collection Mechanism on Accessibility:! Two Cases from Chinese Cities

Transit Joint Development: A New Look at FTA s Guidelines

Neighborhood Conservation District Code Revisions CITY OF MIAMI PLANNING DEPARTMENT NCD-COCONUT GROVE 27 JANUARY

Impact Fee Reductions as Incentives. How Do They Work?

Cadastral survey for the effective management of Cave in Korea

TOD and Equity. TOD Working Group. James Carras Carras Community Investment, Inc. August 7, 2015

PLANNING FOR PARKING AROUND MARTA STATIONS. Lindbergh Transit Oriented Development. Lessons Learned & Best Practices

Land Stewardship at TODs Does It Work?

MPN. S broad street corner development site. 701 s broad street, philadelphia, pa 19147

MONROE WARD REZONING SUMMARY. October 2018

Planning Justification Report

APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT ST. LAURENT BOULEVARD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TIA SCOPING FORM. Prepared for:

UPDATE Board of Selectmen June 20, 2017

Montgomery Residential Report February 2018

Building Livable Communities with Transit. Introduction to Financing Livable Communities. Portland Lindbergh City Center Case Study

Modernizing DC s Zoning Code. Summer/Fall 2012

Terrance Ware Manager, Transit-Oriented Development City & County of Honolulu

The City of Burlington 4880 VALERA ROAD PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT. December 2017 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT. AJC Project Number:

1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE CIP VISION LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Municipal Act Planning Act...

6208 Jeanne D Arc Boulevard North. Planning Rationale. Site Plan Control

Streamlining the Entitlement Process for Transit-Oriented Development

Impacts of a New Transit Service on Property Values

Metropolitan Transportation Authority Hudson Yards TOD

Transit Oriented Development Right Sizing TODs. & Travel. GB Arrington. TCRP Report 128 Effects of TOD on Housing, Parking,

Markets, Design through regulations, and housing affordability

YOUR GUIDE TO. Transit Oriented Development. National Institute of Urban Affairs

Residential Land Strategy for Ottawa

Technology-driven solutions for the innovation of land administration and management

MTR Kwun Tong Line Extends to Ho Man Tin and Whampoa Stations From 23 October 2016

DRAFT Specific Plan. Ordinance No. ### Adopted month day, year

Portland s Recent Experience with Reduced Off-Street Parking Regulation. Rail~Volution October, 2013

The Florida Affordable Housing Suitability Model. Florida Housing Coalition State Conference Sept. 27, 2011

DIRECTIONS/HOTELS/MAPS/PARKING

UrbanFootprint Place Types. Urban Mixed Use. Urban Residential. Urban Commercial. Residential 1% SF Large Lot 0%

housing element of the general plan Approved and Adopted April 2011

98 Ralph avenue Brooklyn, NY Bedford stuyvesant

SB 827 (WIENER) TRANSIT-RICH HOUSING BONUS, RESOLUTION TO OPPOSE UNLESS AMENDED COUNCILMEMBER JOHN D'AMICO COUNCILMEMBER LAUREN MEISTER

Megacities: Lessons of Experience

Cities for development

Incentive Zoning. City Plan Commission September 20, Pam Thompson, Senior Planner, Sustainable Development and Construction

DMC Office Market. Savills Research. Savills Research I Seoul, Korea. November DMC Office Market Summary, Q3/

Approval to Negotiate and Execute a Term Sheet at Branch Avenue

REPORT OF THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FOR APPLICATION FOR REZONING ORDINANCE TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AUGUST 20, 2015

RTD NEIGHBORHOOD ECO PASS RESOURCE GUIDE

UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPER S DECISION- MAKING IN THE REGION OF WATERLOO

BUSINESS AND SPACES THAT WORK TOGETHER

Report by Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee (B)

PLANNING AND REGULATING HOUSING OPTIONS FOR CHANGING DEMOGRAPHICS

Summary of Findings & Recommendations

Transcription:

Seoul BRT - Innovative system of meeting the travel demand - 2010. 8. 24 (The 5 th EST Forum in Bangkok) KWON, Young Jong A Senior Research Fellow, Korea Transport Institute

Overview I. Introduction of the Seoul Metropolitan Areas II. Recent Travel Conditions and Patterns in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas III. Bus Rapid Transit Policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas

I. Introduction of the Seoul Metropolitan Areas 1. Area, Pop. and Economy 2. Suburbanization and Density

1. Location, Pop. and Economy I. Introduction of the Seoul Metropolitan Areas Location Function Pop., Area, & Economy Area (km 2 ) Population (1,000 person) GRDP (billion $) Entire Korea 99,678 (100%) 49,624 (100%) 8,178 (100%) SMAs 11,739 (11.8%) 24,127 (48.6%) 3,870 (47.3%) Seoul Incheon Kyunggi 605 (0.6%) 1,002 (1.0%) 10,132 (10.2%) 10,356 (20.9%) 2,664 (5.4%) 11,107 (22.4%) 1,851 (22.6%) 379 (4.6%) 1,640 (20.1%)

I. Introduction of the Seoul Metropolitan Areas 2. Suburbanization and Development Density Suburbanization Early 1990s Housing-Oriented Sub. First-Dev. Then Transport Road-Oriented Tran. Pol. Development Density Pop. Density (1000 per./ km2 ) Employee Density (100Emp. / km2 ) Firm Density (100Fir m/ km2 ) SMA 2.06 6.65 1.28 Seoul Incheon Kyunggi 17.12 2.66 1.10 64.37 7.44 3.12 12.13 1.55 0.61

II. Recent Travel Conditions and Patterns in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas 1. Increasing Travel Demand and Modal Split 2. Increasing Travel Distance and Worsening Traffic Congestion

Modal Split II. Recent Travel Condition and Pattern in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas 1. Increasing Travel Demand and Modal Split Trend of Population, Car Registration and Car Trips Metropolitan Area Seoul Population (1,000) Car Registration (1,000) Car Trips (1,000) Yr. 2002 22,877 6,484 4,748 Yr. 2006 24,127 7,319 5,587 Change (%) 5.5% 12.9% 17.7% Yr. 2002 10,281 2,691 2,054 Yr. 2006 10,356 2,852 2,260 Change (%) 0.7% 6.0% 10.0% Modal Split Trend of Private Cars and Public Transit 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 17.3% 14.5% 13.1% 52.6% 51.5% 53.4% 29.3% 32.9% 35.4% Yr 1996 Yr 2002 Yr 2006 Private Cars Public Transit Etc.

Congestion Cost(Unit: Billion KWR) 2. Increasing Travel Distance and Worsening Traffic Congestion II. Recent Travel Condition and Pattern in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas Change Trend of Commuting Distance Seoul Incheon Kyunggi Metropolitan Area Yr 1995 7.06km 6.31km 7.79km 7.37km Yr 2000 6.58km 6.06km 8.19km 7.41km Yr 2005 7.76km 6.92km 9.27km 8.49km Change ( 95~ 05) 0.7 km (110.02%) 0.61 km (109.67%) 1.48 km (119.00%) 1.12 km (115.20%) Source: Korea Transport Institute (2008) Impacts of School Supply Policy on Transportation in the Seoul Metropolitan Area, Policy Meeting Report, p.53. Road congestion costs Ulsan Daejun Kwangju Incheon 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 Daegu 2000 Busan 1000 Seoul 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Year Traffic Congestion Cost(Unit: Billion KWR, $1=1,000KWR) a) Congestion costs of major cities (b) Trend of congestion costs for Source: Cho and Shim (2008)

III. Bus Rapid Transit Policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas 1. New Town Development and TOD 2. Case Study: Unjeong New Town TOD Project 3. TOD and Housing Policy in Seoul 4. Regional BRT Plan and Policy 5. BRT Operation and Construction Plan in the Seoul City

III. Bus Rapid Transit Policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas 1. New Town Development and TOD New Town Development 1 st New Towns Yr. 1989-1995 1.2M People 2 nd New Towns Policy Changes 1 st New Towns Pop. Decentralization Stabilizing Housing Price Housing-Oriented Dev. Dev. First, then Transport 2 nd New Towns 3 rd New Towns Yr. 2007-2013 0.15 M People Yr. 2003-2010 0.4 M People Self-Sufficiency Relatively Low-Density for Env. Preservation New Town TOD 3 rd New Towns Same as 2 nd NT Dev. Stabilizing Housing Price esp. Kangnam-subcenter area

2. Case Study: Unjeong New Town TOD Prj. Land Use Plan & Rail Stations III. Bus Rapid Transit Policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas Location Development Plan Source: Kim(2006) Unjeong Stn. New Stn. Seoul Time Span 2004.12~2009.12 Developer Develop. Outline Korea National Housing Corporation + Paju City Area: 9,407,766 m2 Population: 124,898 persons (46,256 households) Density: 133 persons/ha Land Use Plan Area Ratio Total 9,407,766 m2 100.0% Residential 3,248,327 m2 34.6% Park& Green 2,851,160 m2 30.3% Road 1,446,830 m2 15.3% School 488,002 m2 5.2% Commercial 411,502 m2 4.4% Source: Kho(2006) Others 1,264,274 m2 13.4%

III. Bus Rapid Transit Policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas 2. Case Study: Unjeong New Town TOD Prj. Regional Transport System Plan High-Speed Kyungui Railway Regional BRT on Urban Expressway New Rail Station and Transit Center BRT Route Plan within the New Town Line Plan - BRT-A : CBD(Unjeong St.) 5 4 Expressway Susack St., 33.0km - BRT-B : CBD(Unjeong St.) New Rail St. 3 7 Expressway Susack St., 33.6km - BRT-C : Kyumcheon 6 CBD(Unjeong St.) 5 4 Expressway Susack St., 34.8km Unjeong St. (Transit Center) New Rail Station BRT-C BRT 4 BRT-A 7 5 6 BRT-B 1 3 2 Source:Kho(2006) Source:Kho(2006)

2. Case Study: Unjeong New Town TOD Prj. Unjeong St. Transit Center Travel Demand of Unjeong St. in 2029 Transfer Modes Unjeong Car Station Walking Bus Taxi Bike Park & Ride Kiss & Ride Getting On 28,043 16,981 9,316 437 1,181 84 44 Getting Off 28,139 17,039 9,940 439 677 44 Location of Unjeong St. Transit Center III. Bus Rapid Transit Policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas Transit Center (Unit: Person/Day) Transit Center Bus & Ride Park & Ride Bus & Ride Source:Kho(2006) Source:Kho(2006)

Development Density III. Bus Rapid Transit Policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas 3. TOD and Housing Supply Policy in the city of Seoul Rosario Concept Late Prof. Kang s Rosario Concept in 1980 Coordination b/w subway construction plan and urban development within the city Inducing all development to accommodate population growth in 2000 (10 M people) Urban Comprehensive Plan (Yr 1992 and Yr 1997) However, not succeeded because of new town development by the central government Non-residential use Rail station High-density residential use Low-density residential use Underground Walking- Available Distance Distance Current Plan(2008) Housing Supply Plan for 160,000 HHs in the Rail Station Area until Yr. 2018 Long-term rental housing for 30,000 HHs (Low-income group, the elderly, etc) Incentives: releasing such regulations as FAR, Height for development through upzoning

III. Bus Rapid Transit Policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas 4. Regional BRT Plan and Policy Total 22 regional BRT Lines (540km) Planned in 2003 Along with the areas not served by railways and to the city of Seoul Reflected to the 2nd Implementation Plan of Metropolitan Transportation (Yr. 2004~2008) 2 regional lines already operating and 2 regional lines constructing in 2008 BRT Line BRT Plans Line Plans BRT Routes BRT Routes and Plans and Plans BRT in Constructing 1) Kyungbu 1) Kyungbu Exp. (40.2km) Exp. (40.2km) E 2) X Bundang 2) Bundang Urb. Exp. Urb. (9.8km) Exp. (9.8km) 3) PR Olympic 3) Olympic Urb. Exp. Urb. (40.7km) Exp. (40.7km) 4) North 4) Kangbyun North Kangbyun Urb. Exp. Urb. (65.4km) Exp. (65.4km) 5) E Kyungin 5) Kyungin Exp. (13.8km) Exp. (13.8km) 6) SS Ansan 6) Exp. Ansan (29.8km) Exp. (29.8km) 7) W Chuncheun 7) Chuncheun Exp. (14.8km) Exp. (14.8km) 8) AY Phochun 8) Phochun Exp. (53.4km) Exp. (53.4km) 9) Munsan 9) Munsan Exp. (22.1km) Exp. (22.1km) 10) Kanghwa 10) Kanghwa Exp. (17.4km) Exp. (17.4km) 11) National 11) National Road No.1 Road (14.8km) No.1 (14.8km) A 12) Suwon~Sadang 12) Suwon~Sadang Road (30.0km) Road (30.0km) RT 13) National 13) National Support Support Road No.23 Road (18.8km) No.23 (18.8km) 14) E Sungnam 14) Sungnam Road (22.2km) Road (22.2km) 15) R Chunho 15) Chunho Road (13.4km) Road (13.4km) 16) I Seoul~Chuncheun 16) Seoul~Chuncheun Road (20.2km) Road (20.2km) A 17) National 17) National Road No.3 Road (7.6km) No.3 (7.6km) L 18) Tongil 18) Road Tongil (29.5km) Road (29.5km) 19) R Susak 19) Road Susak (19.5km) Road (19.5km) 20) O National 20) National Road No.48 Road (25.5km) No.48 (25.5km) 21) A Seoul~Incheon 21) Seoul~Incheon Road (19.2km) Road (19.2km) D 22) Chungra~Hwagok 22) Chungra~Hwagok Road (18.2km) Road (18.2km) Operating Operating Constructing Constructing Planning Planning Const. Period Chungra BRT 2007 ~2012 Chunho BRT 2006 ~2010 Nangok BRT 2005 ~2009 Length 18.2 km 10.5 km 3.1 km Total Cost (B KWR) Develo -per 125.5 (73.5) 62.3 (24.9) 25.3 (17.1) SMTA SMTA Seoul City Note: The cost of ( ) is financed by the central government; SMTA=Seoul Metropolitan Transportation Association

4. Regional BRT Plan and Policy III. Bus Rapid Transit Policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas Kyungbu Expressway BRT Susack BRT Opening in 2008 Total Length = 44.8km Operating fr. 7 to 21 O clock Kyungbu Inter-regional Expressway 190,000 250,000 trips per day Opening in 2006 24-hour operating on the arterial road Total Length = 15.6km Travel time decreased up to 11 min. for bus and 3 min. for car

5. BRT Planning and Policy in Seoul Reform of Bus Network System Exclusive median bus lanes Bus management System III. Bus Rapid Transit Policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas BRT in Seoul began with the reform of public transit system in 2004 Bus System Reform in 2004 Reform of Public transport System in Seoul High Quality Bus Transit Transfer Center Reform of Bus Operation System Integrated fare system New Smart Card System Improvement on safety environment of urban rail Seoul = Transit-oriented city

III. Bus Rapid Transit Policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas 5. BRT Plan and Policy in Seoul Evaluation of BRT Operation Performance in the City of Seoul Source : http://www.seoul.go.kr Ridership Before: the 4th quarter of 2004 After: the 4th quarter of 2005 Speed Punctuality Line Dist (km) T-time (min) Deviation from Schedule (Bus_min) Deviation from Schedule (Car_min) Dobong-Mia 15.2 44.3 2.7 15.3 Susack-Sungsan 6.8 18.1 1.2 15.6 Kangnam 4.8 16.7 1.3 4.6 Safety Number of Traffic Accident 7,966 5,971 (25% decreased) Number of Deaths 60 41 (31.7% decreased)

III. Bus Rapid Transit Policy in the Seoul Metropolitan Areas 5. BRT Plan and Policy in Seoul Additional BRT Lines and Plan in the city of Seoul Total BRT lines = 10 in 2008 Total BRT Length =73.5 km in 2008 Add 5 lines (44.1km) in 2009 BRT Line Opening Time Length Chunho-Hajeong 2003.7 7.6Km Dobond-Mia 15.8Km Susack-Sungsan 2004.7 6.8 Km Kangnam(Samil Road) 5.9 Km Mangou 4.8 Km 2005.7 Kyungin 6.8 Km Sheung Daebang 2005.12 9.4 Km Hangang 5.5 Km 2006.12 Mapho 5.3 Km Songpa 2007..1 5.6 Km

Thanks! End.