August 4, 217 Economics Group Special Commentary Housing Chartbook: August 217 The Housing Market Remains Woefully Out of Balance The housing recovery remains woefully out of balance, with far too few homes available for sale in parts of the country where population and employment are growing rapidly. The mismatch between supply and demand has sent home prices soaring in many parts of the West and South, which has reduced affordability and set off alarm bells about another possible housing bubble. While some markets are seeing price gains reminiscent of the height of the housing bubble, most markets are not. The Case-Shiller national home price index has risen 5.6 percent over the past year, which is close to the pace maintained the past four years. Moreover, there are still many housing markets that are languishing throughout the country, particularly in large parts of the South, Midwest and the Northeast. The split is also apparent between many suburban and exurban markets, which have been slower to recover, and many urban markets and areas close to key employment centers, which have seen home prices recover much more rapidly. Homeowners in parts of the country where home prices have been slower to recover have been unable to sell their homes and relocate to more vibrant job markets. As a result, the share of the population moving from one state to another has fallen to its lowest level since World War II. Young persons are less impacted by this trend and continue to migrate to where they believe the greatest opportunities are. The wave of relocating millennials has set off an apartment boom, primarily in rapidly growing Sun Belt cities and parts of the West, many of which are seeing a renaissance in their urban centers, where neighborhoods have often been dramatically gentrified. The geographic mismatch is just one way housing is out of balance. There is also far less turnover in existing homes today than there has been historically, particularly at the lower price points needed to pull first-time buyers back into the market. The lack of lower-priced homes is a consequence of the housing bust. Many of the homes lost to foreclosure were bought by investors and converted to rentals. This trend was particularly prevalent in rapidly growing Sun Belt areas. Figure 1 Figure 2 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.5.9 Multifamily Starts Multifamily Forecast Single-Family Starts Single-Family Forecast Housing Starts Millions of Units Forecast 2.4 2.1 1.8 1.5.9 2 22% 2 18% 1 U.S. Mobility Rate Total Movers as a Percent of the Population Mark Vitner, Senior Economist mark.vitner@wellsfargo.com (74) 41-3277 Hank Carmichael, Economic Analyst john.h.carmichael@wellsfargo.com (74) 41-359 Mobility Rate: 216 @ 1% 2 22% 2 18% 1 Mismatch between supply and demand has sent home prices soaring in many parts of the West and South. The lack of lower-priced homes is a consequence of the housing bust..6.6 1 1.3.3.. 1 8 82 84 86 88 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 18 2 48 52 56 6 64 68 72 76 8 84 88 92 96 4 8 12 16 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities 1 This report is available on wellsfargo.com/economics and on Bloomberg WFRE.
Housing Chartbook: August 217 August 4, 217 There is also far less housing turnover at higher price points. We have slightly scaled back our forecast homes sales and new home construction. Demographics Headwinds Are Taking Longer to Dissipate The lack of turnover is also a problem at higher price points, which is inhibiting trade-ups. Part of the problem in the trade-up market is that there are so few homes available for sale in the nation s stronger economies that many potential home buyers are choosing to stay put, further compounding the lack of inventory. The inclination to stay put has likely been reinforced by the persistence of low mortgage rates that have allowed homeowners to refinance at incredibly low interest rates and quickly build equity. For many homeowners, refinancing their home has provided their biggest financial windfall in recent years, and they are unwilling to put their current lower housing costs at risk to trade up for another home at what looks like the top of the market in many parts of the country. There have been some signs that this logjam is beginning to break. There has been a slight uptick in the corporate relocation market, with businesses and workers leaving higher costs markets like California, New Jersey and Connecticut for lower costs areas like Texas, Florida, Georgia and the Carolinas. Baby Boomers are also retiring in increasing numbers, boosting demand for homes in retiree-driven markets like Florida, Arizona, Nevada and South Carolina. In many cases, retirees are buying homes without selling their current residence. This is not that unusual, as youngerretirees tend to gradually transition to full-time living in retiree areas and may choose to hold onto their current home to maintain ties with family. There has been a rise in the number of vacant homes held off the market and more homes are also likely been rented. We are also seeing some positive trends in the first-time home buyer market. Millennials are aging up and the leading edge of this cohort is now reaching their peak family formation years. While Millennials face more obstacles than previous generations, such as larger student loan debts and generally tighter mortgage qualification requirements, their sheer numbers are pushing first-time home buying higher. The rising number of first-time buyers is a big reason why the median price of a new home has fallen over the past year, as homebuilders are increasingly finding ways to bring more affordable homes to market. The median price of a new home has fallen 3.4 percent over the past year to $31,8, as a larger share of new home sales in recent months has been for homes priced under $3,. Even with the drop, new homes still sell at a huge premium to existing homes. The large relative price gap is creating an opportunity for builders able to ramp up production of lower-priced homes. With half the year in the books, we have slightly scaled back our forecasts for homes sales and new home construction. While demand remains solid, diminishing affordability amid a general lack of homes available for sale appear to be problems with no quick or easy solutions. New home sales remain on pace to rise 1.5 percent this year to 62, homes. Sales should rise an additional 9.7 percent in 218. Existing home sales should rise 2.5 percent this year, as tight supplies continue to push prices up faster than incomes. Figure 3 Figure 4 2 Existing Home Sales Year-Over-Year Change 2 1.6 New to Existing Home Price Ratio 12-MMA, Median New Home Price, Mendian Existing Home Price 1.6 2 2 New to Existing Home Price Ratio: Jul @ 1.32 1 1 1 1 1.4 1.4 - - -1-1 -2-2 Northeast Midwest South West U.S. $-K $-25K $25-5K $5-75K $75K-1M $1M+ -1-1 -2-2 1..8 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 1..8 Source: NAR, U.S. Dept. of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities 2
Housing Chartbook: August 217 August 4, 217 National Housing Outlook Forecast 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 Real GDP, Percent Change 2.5 1.6 2.2 1.7 2.4 2.6 1.6 2.1 2.5 Residential Investment, Percent Change -2.5.5 13.5 11.9 3.5 11.7 4.9 2.5 4.6 Nonfarm Payroll Change (Avg. Monthly) 88 174 179 192 25 226 187 164 14 Unemployment Rate 9.6 8.9 8.1 7.4 6.2 5.3 4.9 4.4 4.1 Home Construction Total Housing Starts, in Thousands 586.9 68.8 78.6 924.9 1,3.3 1,111.8 1,173.7 1,24. 1,32. Single-Family Starts, in Thousands 471.1 43.5 535.3 617.7 647.9 714.5 781.5 86. 93. Multifamily Starts, in Thousands 115.8 178.3 245.3 37.2 355.4 397.3 392.2 38. 39. Home Sales New Home Sales, Single-Family, in Thousands 322. 35. 369. 429. 437. 51. 561. 62. 68. Total Existing Home Sales, in Thousands 4,19. 4,26. 4,66. 5,9. 4,94. 5,25. 5,45. 5,58. 5,72. Existing Single-Family Home Sales, in Thousands 3,78. 3,787. 4,128. 4,484. 4,344. 4,646. 4,838. 4,96. 5,9. Existing Condominium & Townhouse Sales, in Thousands 474. 477. 528. 63. 591. 68. 614. 62. 63. Home Prices Median New Home, $ Thousands 221.8 227.2 245.2 268.9 282.8 296.4 316.2 325. 335.2 Percent Change 2.4 2.4 7.9 9.7 5.2 4.8 6.7 2.8 3.1 Median Existing Home, $ Thousands 172.9 166.1 176.8 197.1 28.3 222.4 233.8 247.9 262.3 Percent Change.2-3.9 6.4 11.5 5.7 6.8 5.1 6. 5.8 FHFA Purchase Only Index, Percent Change -3. -4.1 3. 7.3 5.3 5.6 6.1 6.4 6. S&P Case-Shiller C-1 Home Price Index, Percent Change 2.1-3.5.3 11.7 7.9 4.6 4.5 5.5 5.4 Interest Rates - Annual Averages Federal Funds Target Rate.25.25.25.25.25.27.52 5 1.88 Prime Rate 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.25 3.27 3.52 4.25 4.88 1-Year Treasury Note 3.22 2.78 1.8 2.35 2.54 2.14 1.84 2.42 2.71 Conventional 3-Year Fixed Rate, Commitment Rate 4.69 4.46 3.66 3.98 4.17 3.85 3.65 4.12 4.41 Forecast as of: August 2, 217 Source: U.S. Dept. of Commerce, U.S. Dept. of Labor, FRB, FHFA, FHLMC, National Association of Realtors, S&P, Wells Fargo Securities 3
Housing Chartbook: August 217 August 4, 217 Mortgages 7% Mortgage Rate vs. 1-Year Treasury Yield Percent 7% Mortgage rates dipped for the third week in a row to end the month at 3.92 percent. While down substantially from their post-election highs, mortgage rates remain about 35 bps above their level prior to the presidential election. As a result, the pull-back in rates has done more for lifting purchase applications than it has refinancings. Mortgage purchase applications have been gradually trending higher for the past few months, reflecting the modest uptrend in new home sales. After a bump following the surprise Brexit vote, refinancing applications have settled back down near their lows. 3% 2% 1% Conv. 3-Year Fixed Mortg. Rate: Jul-26 @ 3.92% 1-Year Yield: Jul-26 @ 2.27% 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 3% 2% 1% Mortgage Apps for Refi and 1-Year Treasury Yield 4-Week Moving Averages 1,5 1,35 New Home Sales vs. Mortgage Purchase Applications Thousands, Index 199=; Seasonally Adjusted 5 45 12, 1, Refi Index: Jul-21 @ 1,345.9 (Left Axis) 1-Year: Jul-21 @ 2.3% (Right Axis) 7. 6. 1,2 4 8, 5. 1,5 35 9 3 6, 4. 75 25 4, 3. 6 2 45 15 2, 2. 3 15 New Home Sales: Jun @ 61, (Left Axis) Mortgage Purchase Applications: Jul @ 242.8 (Right Axis) 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 28 26 Mortgage Applications for Purchase Index Seasonally Adjusted Index, 199= 5 28 26 3 2 2 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 Mortgage Origination by Credit Score Billions of Dollars <62: Q1 @ $17.7B (R) 62-659: Q1 @ $22.8B (R) 66-719: Q1 @ $74.2B (R) 72-759: Q1 @ $77.7B (R) 76+: Q1 @ $299.1B (R) Subprime Share: Q1 @ 8.2% (L) 1. $1,2 $1, $8 24 24 1 $6 22 22 1 $4 2 2 $2 18 16 Weekly Figure: Jul-21 @ 24.1 Mort. Appl.: 4-Week Average: Jul 21 @ 244.4 14 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 16 14 $ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Source: MBA, FHLMC, Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, FRBNY and Wells Fargo Securities 4
Housing Chartbook: August 217 August 4, 217 Single-Family Construction 2. Single-family housing starts rose 6.3 percent in June, driven primarily by solid gains in the supply-starved South and West. Starts rose 7.2 and 1.6 percent, respectively, in those regions. The rebound reflects some normalization in housing starts, which were buoyed earlier this year by unseasonably mild winter weather, which pulled strength forward from the spring. Single-family permits rose 4.1 percent in June, following three consecutive monthly declines. On a year-to-date basis, permits are running 7.4 percent ahead of their year-ago pace. But permits are also running slightly below the recent pace of starts, suggesting starts are unlikely to suddenly break out to the upside. Single-Family Housing Starts vs. Building Permits SAAR, In Millions, 3-Month Moving Average 2. 2. 1.8 1.6 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Builder Confidence & Single-Family Starts Diffusion Index; Starts SAAR 3-MMA in Millions NAHB Housing Market Index: Jul @ 64. (Left Axis) Single-Family Housing Starts: Jun @ 824K (Right Axis) 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 Single-Family Housing Completions Year-over-Year Percent Change 2, 1,8 1,6 1,4 1,2 1, 8 6 4 2 2. 1.8 1.6 1.8 1.8 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.6 1.4 1.4 1. 1..8.8 1. 1..6.6.8.6.8.6.4 Single-Family Housing Completions: Jun @ 798K.2 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17.4.2.4 Single-Family Housing Starts: Jun @ 824K Single-Family Building Permits: Jun @ 795K.2 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 2,4 2, 1,8 1,5 1,2 9 6 3 Single-Family Housing Starts Annual Average of SAAR SF Housing Starts: 217 @ 831K 217 is YTD Average of SAAR.4.2 2,4 2, 1,8 1,5 1,2 9 6 3 Single-Family Housing Permits by MSA Year-to-Date, Total Number of Permits in Thousands Houston, TX Dallas, TX Atlanta, GA Phoenix, AZ Austin, TX Orlando, FL Washington, DC-VA-MD-WV Charlotte, NC-SC Nashville, TN Tampa, FL Raleigh, NC Riverside, CA Los Angeles, CA Denver, CO Las Vegas, NV June 217 5 1 15 2 25 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Association of Home Builders and Wells Fargo Securities 5
Housing Chartbook: August 217 August 4, 217 Multifamily Construction 6 Multifamily Housing Starts vs. Building Permits SAAR, In Thousands, 3-Month Moving Average 6 Despite jumping 13 percent in June, multifamily housing starts and permits have both slowed significantly. The three-month moving average shows both series have clearly rolled over, possibly reflecting some tightening in credit. Multifamily effective rent growth has slowed to nearly a standstill, rising.2 percent over the quarter, the smallest quarterly gain since 29. There has been a surge of apartment deliveries over the past few quarters in many of the fastest growing markets, leading to higher vacancy rates and increased leasing concessions. Demand for apartments remains strong, however, particularly in markets that have not yet seen a surge in new apartment development. Multifamily Housing Permits by MSA Year-to-Date, Total Number of Permits in Thousands New York, NY-NJ-PA Dallas, TX Los Angeles, CA Denver, CO Seattle, WA Miami, FL Chicago, IL-IN-WI Atlanta, GA Austin, TX San Francisco, CA Phoenix, AZ Washington, DC-VA-MD-WV Boston, MA-NH Houston, TX Tampa, FL June 217 5 4 3 2 5 4 3 2 Multifamily Housing Starts: Jun @ 34K Multifamily Building Permits: Jun @ 422K 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 Multifamily Housing Starts SAAR, In Thousands, 3-Month Moving Average 5+ Units: Jun @ 328K (Left Axis) 2-4 Units: Jun @ 12K (Right Axis) 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 5 4 3 2 8 6 4 2 5 1 15 2 9% Apartment Supply & Demand Percent, Thousands of Units 6. Apartment Effective Rent Growth Quarter-over-Quarter Percent Change 2. 8% 75 5. 2. 7% 5 4. 3. 1. % 25 2..8% 1.... -25-1. -. -2. -.8% -3. -% -4. Quarter-over-Quarter: Q1 @.2% (Right Axis) -1. Year-over-Year: Q1 @ 3. (Left Axis) -5. -2. 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 3% Apartment Net Completions: Q1 @ 39, Units (Right Axis) Apartment Net Absorption: Q1 @ 23,79 Units (Right Axis) Apartment Vacancy Rate: Q1 @ 4.3% (Left Axis) 2% -75 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, Reis, Inc., and Wells Fargo Securities -5 6
Housing Chartbook: August 217 August 4, 217 Buying Conditions 9 Home Purchase Sentiment Index Index 9 The current housing environment is imbalanced, with a shortage of homes available for sale keeping potential buyers and sellers on the sidelines and driving home prices higher. The West has been particularly hard hit, as construction has been unusually slow to ramp back up. Demand is not the issue. The Fannie Mae Home Purchase Sentiment Index rose to a post-recession high of 88.3 in June. The University of Michigan s measure of the proportion of consumers stating that now is a good time to buy a home continues to trend lower and is now even with the rising number stating that now is a good time to sell. Potential buyers have been put off by the general lack of inventory and rising home prices. 3 32% Consumer Confidence vs. Disposable Income Pct. Consumers That Expect Incomes to Increase Next 6 Months 6-Month Income Expectations 12-MMA: Jul @ 19.2% (Left Axis) Income Yr/Yr % Chg. 12-MMA: May @ 3.7% (Right Axis) 1 8 7 6 Home Purchase Sentiment Index: Jun @ 88.3 5 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 2 175 15 125 Good Time to Buy vs. Good Time to Sell University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Survey Good Time to Buy a House: Jun @ 143. Good Time to Sell a House: Jun @ 143. 8 7 6 5 2 175 15 125 28% 8% 2 75 75 2 5 5 1 2% 25 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 8% -2% 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 72% 7 Homeownership vs. Housing Affordability Percentage, Index Homeownership Rate: Q2 @ 63.7% (Left Axis) Housing Affordability Index: Q2 @ 154.5 (Right Axis) - 21 19 3 2 18% Home Prices vs. Wages and Salaries Year-over-Year Percentage Change Wage & Salaries (3-MMA): May @ 3. S&P/Case-Shiller Composite-2: May @ 5.7% National HPI: May @ 5. 3 2 18% 68% 17 6 15 - - - - 6 13-18% -18% 62% 11-2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17-2 6 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 9 Source: University of Michigan, National Association of Realtors, The Conference Board, S&P, Fannie Mae, U.S. Dept. of Commerce and Wells Fargo Securities 7
Housing Chartbook: August 217 August 4, 217 New Home Sales New home sales inched up to a 61,-unit pace in June. The West and Midwest led the way. Supply concerns have been the primary drag on new home sales. The recent momentum in the West is an encouraging sign, however, as completions have risen in this rapidly growing region, which is seeing increased development. Homebuilders have been ramping up construction of lower priced homes in an effort to attract more first-time buyers. The shifting price mix has pulled down the median price of a new home over the past year. Builders are increasingly looking to lower-priced suburban areas for lots, which is one reason so much of the recent gain in home sales has been for homes where construction has not yet begun. 2 1 Median New Home Sales Price Year-over-Year Percent Change, 3-Month Moving Average Median New Sales Price: Jun @ $31,8 Year-over-Year Percent Change: Jun @. 2 1 1 9% 8% 7% New Home Sales vs. Mortgage Rates Seasonally Adjusted Annual Rate, In Thousands Mortgage Rate: Jun @ 3.9% (Left Axis) New Home Sales: Jun @ 61, (Right Axis) 3% 93 95 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 14 12 1 Months' Supply of New Homes Seasonally Adjusted Months' Supply: Jun @ 5.4 1,75 1,5 1,25 1, 75 5 25 14 12 1 1 1 8 8 6 6 4 4 - - -1-1 2 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 2-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17-1 18 New Home Sales New Homes Sold During Month, Index 22=, 3-MMA 18 $44 Average and Median New Home Sale Price In Thousands $44 16 14 16 14 $4 $4 12 12 $36 $36 $32 $32 8 8 $28 $24 $2 $16 Average Sales Price: Jun @ $379,5 $28 $24 $2 $16 6 4 South: Jun @ 82.6 Midwest: Jun @ 37. 2 West: Jun @ 68.8 Northeast: Jun @ 59.7 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 6 4 2 Median New Sales Price: Jun @ $31,8 $12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 $12 Source: U.S. Department of Commerce, FHLMC and Wells Fargo Securities 8
Housing Chartbook: August 217 August 4, 217 Existing Home Sales 13 Pending vs. Existing Home Sales Index 21=, SAAR in Millions 7.5 Existing home sales fell for the second time in three months, declining by 1.8 percent to a 5.5 million-unit pace. The drop is most likely due to the lack of supply of homes available for sale. The inventory of existing homes for sale has declined year-to-year for the past 25 months. The lack of homes is particularly an issue in the South and West, which account for over half of the nation s existing home sales. This has pushed the median existing single-family home price to a record $266,2 and pulled affordability lower. The lack of existing homes for sale is most apparent at the lower end of the price spectrum, which is where investor purchases of distressed properties have severely reduced inventories and profoundly lowered housing turnover. Home sales below $, fell 9.3 percent over the year. 115 85 7 Existing Home Sales: Jun @ 5.52 Million (Right Axis) 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 4.5 Pending Home Sales Index: Jun @ 1 (Left Axis) Inventory of Existing Homes for Sale Existing Homes for Sale at End of Month, In Millions Total Inventory: Jun @ 1.96M 4.5 6.5 5.5 4.5 3.5 2.5 Existing Single Family Home Sales vs. Mortgage Rate Percent and SAAR In Millions 4. 4. 3-Yr. Conventional Mortg. Rate: Jun @ 3.9 (Left Axis) SF Existing Home Sales: Jun @ 4.9 Million (Right Axis) 7. 3.5 3.5 1 6. 3. 3. 8% 5. 2.5 2.5 4. 2. 2. 3. 1.5 99 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1.5 2% 86 88 9 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 $35 Existing Single-Family Home Prices In Thousands 2. $35 15 13 Existing Home Sales Existing Homes Sold During Month, Index, 22= Northeast: Jun @ 76. Midwest: Jun @ 95. South: Jun @ 15.2 West: Jun @ 9.3 15 13 11 11 $3 $3 9 9 $25 $25 7 7 $2 $2 5 5 $15 Average Sale Price: Jun @ $35,5 $15 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 3 Median Sale Price: Jun @ $266,2 $ 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 $ Source: National Association of Realtors, FHLMC and Wells Fargo Securities 9
Housing Chartbook: August 217 August 4, 217 Home Prices 24 22 2 18 16 14 The S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Index rose 5.6 percent year-to-year in May. Prices are rising the fastest in the West, where population and employment are growing rapidly and homebuilding remains constrained. While prices are surging in the West, they are cooling off slightly in some larger metro areas, including New York, Chicago and Washington D.C. All of these markets are included in the 1-City HPI, which has underperformed the broader national and 2-City indices. Home prices in Denver and Dallas fell less than they did nationally during the housing bust and recovered much more rapidly, lifting home prices in both well past their previous highs. 12 National HPI: May @ 19.6 Composite-2 City: May @ 199. Composite-1 City: May @ 212.3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 2 S&P CoreLogic CS Home Price Index Index, January 2= Home Prices Year-over-Year Percentage Change 2 24 22 2 18 16 14 12 Seattle Portland Denver Dallas Detroit Las Vegas Tampa San Diego Boston Charlotte Phoenix Minneapolis Los Angeles Atlanta San Francisco Miami New York City Washington, D.C. Cleveland Chicago C-1 C-2 National HPI Denver Dallas Portland Seattle Boston San Francisco Charlotte Atlanta San Diego Los Angeles Minneapolis Cleveland Detroit Washington, D.C. New York City Chicago Tampa Miami Phoenix Las Vegas 24 22 C-1 C-2 National HPI S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Prices Year-over-Year Percent Change, NSA 8.9% 7.9% 7.8% 7. 6.9% 6.8% 6. 6.1% 6.1% 5.7% 5.7% 5. 5. 5. 5.3% 4. 3. 3. 3.3% 4.9% 5.7% 5. 13.3% May 217 2% 8% 1 1 S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Prices Percent Change from Previous Peak, NSA May 217-4.2% -4. -6.3% -7.2% -1. -11. -12. -17. -18.3% -2.2% -25.8% -31. -6.2% -3.7% 17.9% 17.7% 1.1% 9.8% 9.2% % 3.2% 41. 39. -5-4 -3-2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller Home Price Index Index, January 2= Denver: May @ 198.3 National HPI: May @ 19.6 Dallas: May @ 176.5 24 22 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 18 18 16 16 - - 14 14-1 -1-1 -1 12 12-2 Median Sale Price: Jun @ $266,2 Median Sale Price, 3-M Mov Avg: Jun @ 6.2% -2 FHFA Purchase Only Index: May @ 6.9% S&P/Case-Shiller Composite-1: May @ 4.9% -3 97 99 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17-2 -2-3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Source: National Association of Realtors, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, S&P, FHFA and Wells Fargo Securities 1
Housing Chartbook: August 217 August 4, 217 Renovation and Remodeling Residential improvements spending rose less than initially thought, with spending rising 6.2 percent year-to-year in the first quarter. Earlier data had put the gain at 7.5 percent. Milder conditions this past winter pulled spending at home improvement centers forward into the first quarter and contributed to a slow start to the spring. The Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS) expects home improvement spending to continue to strengthen. With for-sale inventories unusually lean, more homeowners are opting to renovate their existing homes. Rising home values are also encouraging homeowners to enhance their current homes. 4 3 2 1-1 -2-3 -4 Residential Improvements Year-over-Year Percent Change Improvements: Q1 @ 6.2% Res. Investment Ex. Improvements: Q1 @ 7.1% -5 96 98 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 65 NAHB Remodeling Market Index Index, Seasonally Adjusted 4 3 2 1-1 -2-3 -4-5 65 $1, $1, $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 Residential Investment Billions of Dollars Other: Q1 @ $1.3 B Brokers' Commissions: Q1 @ $169.1 B Improvements: Q1 @ $235.5 B New Building: Q2 @ $323.7 B $1, $1, $9 $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 6 55 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 Overall Index: Q1 @ 58.3 15 Future Expectations: Q1 @ 58.2 Backlog of Remodeling Jobs: Q1 @ 61.8 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 6 55 5 45 4 35 3 25 2 15 1 $ $ $35 $ 92 94 96 98 2 4 6 8 1 12 14 16 Leading Indicator of Remodeling Activity In Billions, 4-Q Moving Total, Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies JCHS Forecast $ $35 5 4 3 2 Building Material, Garden Equip & Supply Stores 3-Month Moving Average Year-over-Year Percent Change: Jun @ 7.2% 3-Month Annual Rate: Jun @ -2. 5 4 3 2 $3 $3 1 1 $25 $25-1 -1 $2 $2-2 -2-3 -3 $15 $15-4 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17-4 $ 5 6 7 8 9 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 $ Source: Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NAHB and Wells Fargo Securities 11
Wells Fargo Securities Economics Group Diane Schumaker-Krieg Global Head of Research, Economics & Strategy (74) 41-181 (212) 214-57 diane.schumaker@wellsfargo.com John E. Silvia, Ph.D. Chief Economist (74) 41-3275 john.silvia@wellsfargo.com Mark Vitner Senior Economist (74) 41-3277 mark.vitner@wellsfargo.com Jay H. Bryson, Ph.D. Global Economist (74) 41-3274 jay.bryson@wellsfargo.com Sam Bullard Senior Economist (74) 41-328 sam.bullard@wellsfargo.com Nick Bennenbroek Currency Strategist (212) 214-5636 nicholas.bennenbroek@wellsfargo.com Anika R. Khan Senior Economist (212) 214-8543 anika.khan@wellsfargo.com Eugenio J. Alemán, Ph.D. Senior Economist (74) 41-3273 eugenio.j.aleman@wellsfargo.com Azhar Iqbal Econometrician (74) 41-327 azhar.iqbal@wellsfargo.com Tim Quinlan Senior Economist (74) 41-3283 tim.quinlan@wellsfargo.com Eric Viloria, CFA Currency Strategist (212) 214-5637 eric.viloria@wellsfargo.com Sarah House Economist (74) 41-3282 sarah.house@wellsfargo.com Michael A. Brown Economist (74) 41-3278 michael.a.brown@wellsfargo.com Jamie Feik Economist (74) 41-3291 jamie.feik@wellsfargo.com Erik Nelson Currency Strategist (212) 214-5652 erik.f.nelson@wellsfargo.com Michael Pugliese Economic Analyst (74) 41-3156 michael.d.pugliese@wellsfargo.com E. Harry Pershing Economic Analyst (74) 41-334 edward.h.pershing@wellsfargo.com Hank Carmichael Economic Analyst (74) 41-359 john.h.carmichael@wellsfargo.com Ariana Vaisey Economic Analyst (74) 41-139 ariana.b.vaisey@wellsfargo.com Abigail Kinnaman Economic Analyst (74) 41-157 abigail.kinnaman@wellsfargo.com Shannon Seery Economic Analyst (74) 41-1681 shannon.seery@wellsfargo.com Donna LaFleur Executive Assistant (74) 41-3279 donna.lafleur@wellsfargo.com Dawne Howes Administrative Assistant (74) 41-3272 dawne.howes@wellsfargo.com Wells Fargo Securities Economics Group publications are produced by Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, a U.S broker-dealer registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, and the Securities Investor Protection Corp. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, distributes these publications directly and through subsidiaries including, but not limited to, Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank N.A., Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, Wells Fargo Securities International Limited, Wells Fargo Securities Asia Limited and Wells Fargo Securities (Japan) Co. Limited. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. ("WFS") is registered with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission as a futures commission merchant and is a member in good standing of the National Futures Association. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("WFBNA") is registered with the Commodities Futures Trading Commission as a swap dealer and is a member in good standing of the National Futures Association. WFS and WFBNA are generally engaged in the trading of futures and derivative products, any of which may be discussed within this publication. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC does not compensate its research analysts based on specific investment banking transactions. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC s research analysts receive compensation that is based upon and impacted by the overall profitability and revenue of the firm which includes, but is not limited to investment banking revenue. The information and opinions herein are for general information use only. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC does not guarantee their accuracy or completeness, nor does Wells Fargo Securities, LLC assume any liability for any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon any such information or opinions. Such information and opinions are subject to change without notice, are for general information only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sales of any security or as personalized investment advice. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC is a separate legal entity and distinct from affiliated banks and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company 217 Wells Fargo Securities, LLC. Important Information for Non-U.S. Recipients For recipients in the EEA, this report is distributed by Wells Fargo Securities International Limited ("WFSIL"). WFSIL is a U.K. incorporated investment firm authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. The content of this report has been approved by WFSIL a regulated person under the Act. For purposes of the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority s rules, this report constitutes impartial investment research. WFSIL does not deal with retail clients as defined in the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive 27. The FCA rules made under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2 for the protection of retail clients will therefore not apply, nor will the Financial Services Compensation Scheme be available. This report is not intended for, and should not be relied upon by, retail clients. This document and any other materials accompanying this document (collectively, the "Materials") are provided for general informational purposes only. SECURITIES: NOT FDIC-INSURED/NOT BANK-GUARANTEED/MAY LOSE VALUE