RESOLUTION NO. B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and

Similar documents
CITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP

ORDINANCE NUMBER WHEREAS, the regulation of development in single-family residential districts is within the police powers of the City; and,

CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

MINNETONKA PLANNING COMMISSION June 2, A conditional use permit for 2,328 square feet of accessory structures at 4915 Highland Road

PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

EL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALBANY, COUNTY

RESOLUTION NO xx

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

MINOR SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CITY OF ROHNERT PARK CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

City of Brisbane Agenda Report

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA Napa (707)

TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

LEMOORE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting AGENDA Lemoore Council Chamber 429 C Street. May 14, :00 p.m.

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238

MINOR SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO A.P. #

ORDINANCE NO

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

ORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary

Residential Project Convenience Facilities

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT August 30, 2007

NOTICE OF A REGULAR MEETING

The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District:

Agenda Item No. October 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager

ORDINANCE NO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

Planning Commission Staff Report

SECTION 10.7 R-PUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ZONE

Article XIII-A. A-1000-M Apartment District Regulations

Glades County Staff Report and Recommendation Unified Staff Report for Small Scale Plan Amendment and Rezoning

RESOLUTION PC NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Duarte resolves as follows:

MEMORANDUM CITY COUNCIL TERESA MCCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR ROBIN DICKERSON, CITY ENGINEER

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3:

RESOLUTION NO

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit

ORDINANCE NO

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAUSALITO AMENDING TITLE 10 TO MODIFY SECTION 10.44

Combined Zoning/Minor Variance and Boulevard Parking Agreement Exception

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

RESOLUTION NUMBER 5059

ORDINANCE NO NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ENACTED BY THE CITY OF WINTER GARDEN, FLORIDA, AS FOLLOWS:

San Carlos Wheeler Plaza Project, Disposal of Former Redevelopment Agency Property and Entry into Related Compensation Agreement

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. T15-058

RESOLUTION NO

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

ORDINANCE NO. 208 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA:

ORDINANCE NO. O-5-10

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

CITY OF BONITA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE NO

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS ZONING ORDINANCE

ARTICLE 44. PD 44. Unless otherwise stated, the definitions and interpretations in Chapter 51 apply to this

Planning Commission Report

DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

Ordinance No. 04 Series of 2013 RECITALS

P.C. RESOLUTION NO

the conditions contained in their respective Orders until January 1, 2025, at the discretion of the Director of Planning, Property and Development.

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL

2. Approval of Minutes Approval of the minutes of the March 2, 2016, May 4, 2016, July 6, 2016 meeting.

820 BEL MARIN KEYS BOULEVARD, NOVATO ASSESSOR'S PARCEL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

SECTION 23 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FOR ELDERLY PERSONS

ORDINANCE NO. _ _

Chair Brittingham, Vice-Chair Barron, Commissioner Hurt, Commissioner Keith, Commissioner LaRock

FENCE PERMIT APPLICATION

And adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Pleasanton on May 2, 2017 by the following vote:

ORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:

SECTION 3.1 ZONING DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED

ORDINANCE NO. Be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Abilene, Texas:

RESOLUTION NO CITY OF MAPLE GROVE

DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

THE CITY COUNCIL OF NORTH ROYALTON, OHIO

AN ORDINANCE OF THE NAPA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN NAPA COUNTY AND NAPA REDEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LLC

RESOLUTION NO. PC 18-14

SECTION 827 "R-2" AND "R-2-A" - LOW DENSITY MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

AGENDA: APRIL 13,1999 SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF A PORTION OF AN OPEN SPACE EASEMENT, APN

AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY GLADES COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

TOOELE COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE CHAPTER 31 Page 1

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REPORT

RESOLUTION TO FORM THE REDSTONE PARKWAY BENEFIT DISTRICT

RESOLUTION NO. P15-07

MUNICIPAL DISTRICT OF ROCKY VIEW NO. 44 ELBOW VALLEY WEST DIRECT CONTROL DISTRICT BYLAW C

Transcription:

RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA RECOMMENDING TO CITY COUNCIL REZONING TO MODIFY THE EXISTING POLICY STATEMENT AND ADOPT THE BAY VILLAGE HOMES DEVELOPMENT PLAN AFFECTING THE PROPERTIES LOCATED ALONG BAY VILLAGE AVENUE BETWEEN BAY MEADOW DRIVE AND MONET STREET, ASSESSOR S PARCEL NUMBERS 036-790-032 THROUGH 036-790-052 - FILE NUMBER MJP14-001 WHEREAS, after public hearing, the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Rosa believes that the changes to the policy statement for PD04-002, effecting the properties situated along Bay Village Avenue between Bay Meadow Drive and Monet Street, within the Planned Development (PD04-002) zoning district, is required for public convenience, necessity and general welfare; and WHEREAS, the Rezoning for PD04-002 is necessary in order to allow development on APN 036-790-052, the subject site, located at the northeast corner of Bay Meadow Drive and Bay Village Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, pursuant to City Code Section 20-64.050 and Section 20-26.060 (Findings), hereby finds and determines: A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of all elements of the General Plan, and any applicable specific plan in that the General Plan land use designation for the subject site allows medium density residential development; and B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and C. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that an Initial Study was conducted resulting in a Mitigated Negative Declaration dated April 13, 2015, posted from April 24, 2015 through June 5, 2015 and adopted by the Planning Commission on June 11, 2015; and D. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of this Zoning Code; and E. The site is physically suitable (including absence of physical constraints, access, compatibility with adjoining land uses, and provision of utilities) for the requested zoning designations and anticipated land uses/developments in that all utilities and emergency services are available; and F. The proposed project would result in preservation of natural amenities including creeks, hillsides and significant vegetation in that proof of purchase for appropriate mitigation credits to mitigate the loss of California Tiger Salamander habitat, the presence of Resolution No. 11706 Page 1 of 3

Burke s goldfield, and the loss of seasonal wetlands shall be provided prior to issuance of any permits resulting in ground disturbing activities G. The proposed project will result in the creation of new amenities such as recreational and/or community facilities in that it will provide a bicycle and pedestrian connection to the commercial properties located to the north along the eastern project boundary; and H. The proposed project will result in diversity in the proposed mix of housing types and densities in the surrounding residential community; and I. The proposed development regulations will ensure a superior relationship among uses within the district as well as those surrounding the district in that parking has been provided in excess of Zoning Code requirements and the inclusion of the pedestrian connection to the properties to the north will result in less vehicular traffic; and J. The project will preserve and protect of the quality of living for areas surrounding the planned community by providing a smooth transition from residential uses to the future development of commercial uses to immediate north; and K. Accommodation of non-auto oriented modes of transportation including pedestrian walkways, bicycle paths and transit routes/stops have been considered in the project design. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Santa Rosa City Planning Commission recommends approval and adoption of the rezoning subject to the following conditions: 1. Sewer connections for this development, or any part thereof, will be allowed only in accordance with the requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region, in effect at the time, or thereafter, that the building permit(s) for this development, or any part thereof, are issued. 2. Compliance with all conditions as specified by the Bay Village Homes Tentative Map Resolution Number 11707. 3. The modified Policy Statement for Planned Development 04-002 attached hereto and incorporated herein, will allow development on the subject parcel. Where the Policy Statement is silent, both in terms of development standards and allowable uses, the default will be compliance with R-3-18 zoning district standards. 4. The Bay Village Home subdivision shall be constructed as shown on the approved Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein. BE IT RESOLVED that the revisions to the PD04-002 Policy Statement attached hereto and incorporated herein are necessary to allow development on the subject parcel at this time because the original Meadowlark Village Unit 2 Subdivision Policy Statement, dated August 26, 2003 required the subject parcel, APN 036-790-052 to be developed with a mix if commercial Resolution No. 11706 Page 2 of 3

and residential uses; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends the City Council the approve and adopt the Rezoning to modify the existing PD04-002 Policy Statement for the properties situated along Bay Village Avenue between Bay Meadow Drive and Monet Street, more precisely described as Assessor s Parcel Numbers 036-790-032 through 036-790- 052. REGULARLY PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Planning Commission of the City of Santa Rosa on the 25 th day of June, 2015, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: APPROVED: CHAIR ATTEST: EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Exhibit A Revised Policy Statement dated September 2014 Exhibit B Development Plan Resolution No. 11706 Page 3 of 3

EXHIBIT A PD No. 04-002 (revised) POLICY STATEMENT Meadowlark Village Unit 2 Subdivision And Bay Village Homes September 2014 Location: Zone: Meadowlark Village Unit 2 and.784- acre parcel northeast of the intersection of Bay Meadow Drive and Bay Village Avenue (Bay Village Homes) PD: Planned Development APN: 036-790- 032 through 052 General Plan: Retail and Business Services/Medium Density Residential I. Purpose: To provide a pedestrian connection in order to integrate the adjoining commercial/mixed use parcels to the north (APNs: 036-011- 053, 046). To allow for attached single- family housing at medium density on parcels within the portion of the multi- parcel, partially developed mixed- use Community Shopping Center/Medium Density Residentially designated area encompassed by this zoning district. II. Principal Permitted Uses: Lots 1 through 20 (Meadowlark Village Unit 2), and Lots 1 through 12 (Bay Village Homes) One single- family attached dwelling per lot. III. Accessory Uses: Lots 1 through 20 (Meadowlark Village Unit 2), and Lots 1 through 12 (Bay Village Homes) The following accessory uses and structures are permitted provided that no accessory use or structure shall be initiated or constructed prior to the construction of or use of the single- family attached dwelling. No accessory use shall be permitted on a separate lot from the main use or building: A. Private Garage accessory to a principal residence.

B. Private swimming pool accessory to a principal residence. C. The accommodation of not more than two roomers or boarders per dwelling. D. Other uses and structures on the same parcel shall be subject to the general and special provisions of the Zoning Code, all applicable laws and are intended solely for use by the occupant of a principal permitted use or uses. IV. Uses Permitted By Conditional Use Permit: Lots 1 through 20 (Meadowlark Village Unit 2) and Lots 1 through 12 (Bay Village Homes). The following uses may be conditionally permitted by conditional use permit and then only when such use conforms to every term and condition of the permit: A. Temporary subdivision sales offices B. Churches C. Community Care Facilities D. Public or private schools V. District Regulations: Lots 1 through 20 (Meadowlark Village Unit 2) and Lots 1 through 12 (Bay Village Homes) A. Minimum Lot Area Dimensions: 1,800 square feet unless otherwise approved by Conditional Use Permit. B. Minimum Yard Setback Requirements: None: Except that all single- family lots shall provide a minimum of 400 square feet of useable private open space. The minimum depth or width shall be 15 feet. Garages or carports when facing the street shall be setback not less than 20 feet to the rear of the public sidewalk, or 20 feet from the property line or adopted street plan line, whichever is greater distance from the edge of pavement of the street. C. Lot Coverage: 65% unless a higher coverage is approved by Conditional Use Permit. D. Maximum building Height: Main Building: 35 feet Accessory Building: 16 feet Detached second unit: 35 feet E. Parking Requirements Parking shall be provided as required by the City of Santa Rosa Zoning Code, except that tandem parking may be counted for both resident and 2

visitor parking and that on- street parking may be counted. Flag lots are not required to provide additional parking beyond that required for the other single- family lots. F. Fences, Hedges and Walls shall comply with all provisions of the Zoning Code. VI. Modification to Policy Statement and Development Plan. Proposed modifications to the Policy Statement and Development Plan shall be subject to Public hearings and City Council action in the same manner as any other change of zone application and shall be considered against the original development plan and policy statement and the conditions obtained at the time the modification is requested, except that minor modifications, which do not increase the approved density, change the approved use or its conditions of approval, change the general appearance of the original project, and do not result in the objections from affected parties within or adjacent to the development who have been publically noticed of the proposed modifications may be allowed by conditional use permit and processed administratively. 3

BAY VILLAGE HOMES Santa Rosa, California FUTURE DIRECT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM BAY VILLAGE AVENUE INTO REAR OF FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT WITH ANTI-GRAFFITI LATTICE TYPICAL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THESE TWO LOTS WITH ANTI-GRAFFITI LATTICE WITH ANTI-GRAFFITI LATTICE 12' LONG SECTION OF REMOVED UPON DEVELOPMENT OF SHOPPING CENTER FUTURE 6' HIGH PRIVACY FENCE (TO BE BUILT WHEN PATH BECOMES PUBLIC ACCESS) 2' WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP BAYMEADOW DRIVE BAY VILLAGE AVENUE MONET COURT 2' WIDE LANDSCAPE STRIP NEW 6' HIGH PRIVACY FENCE (TO BE REMOVED WHEN PATH BECOMES PUBLIC ACCESS) EXISTING 6' HIGH PRIVACY FENCE ON ADJACENT LOT EXISTING 6' HIGH PRIVACY FENCE ON ADJCNT LOT EXISTING HOUSE 8 FOOT WIDE CONCRETE WALKWAY BOULDER BARRICADE (TO BE REMOVED WHEN PATH BECOMES PUBLIC ACCESS) 12 FOOT WIDE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT EXISTING HOMES EXISTING HOMES EXISTING HOMES DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN PD No. 04-002 (Revised Jan 2015) 0' 16' 32' 48' 64' 80' DRAWING SCALE 1/16"= 1'-0"