MOTION NO. M Capitol Hill Site D Agreement with Seattle Central College and Capitol Hill Housing

Similar documents
MOTION NO. M Roosevelt Station Central TOD Site Property Transaction Agreements PROPOSED ACTION

MOTION NO. M Capitol Hill Transit-Oriented Development Purchase and Sale Agreement and Ground Lease

Transfers of Property Q Sound Transit did not transfer any properties subject to RCW (1)(b) during the first quarter of 2018.

Sound Transit s Office of Land Use Planning & Development Transit Oriented Development Quarterly Status Report Q2 2018

Adopts a revised Real Property Excess, Surplus, and Disposition Policy and supersedes Resolution No. R99-35.

MOTION NO. M Property Exchange Agreement with the University of Washington for the Northgate Link Extension

RESOLUTION NO. R To Acquire Real Property Interests Required for the Downtown Redmond Link Extension

RESOLUTION NO. R Agreement with the Port of Everett to Convey Certain Real Property Interests to Sound Transit

MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Recommend to Board. Final Action

RESOLUTION NO. R To Acquire Real Property Interests Required for the Lynnwood Link Extension

RESOLUTION NO. R To Acquire Real Property Interests Required for the Federal Way Link Extension

PROPOSED METRO JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: POLICIES AND PROCESS July 2015 ATTACHMENT B

10/22/2012. Growing Transit Communities. Growing Transit Communities Partnership. Partnership for Sustainable Communities

Cancelled. Final Action

METRO JOINT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: POLICY Updated January 2017


OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

RESOLUTION NO. R To Acquire Real Property Interests Required for the Operations and Maintenance Satellite Facility

Report by Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee (B)

INFORMATION SUBJECT: UPDATE ON COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN FOR PROPOSED GOOGLE DEVELOPMENT AT DIRIDON STATION

Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Progress Report

Sound Transit Capitol Hill Station TOD Sites Baseline Report

TOD and Equity. TOD Working Group. James Carras Carras Community Investment, Inc. August 7, 2015

MITIGATION POLICY FOR DISTRICT-PROTECTED LANDS

Subject. Date: January 12, Chair and Members of Planning and Development Committee 2016/02/01

12. STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED SUMMARY. Date: September 21, Toronto Public Library Board. To: City Librarian. From:

SANTA CLARA COUNTY RHNA SUBREGION TASK FORCE GUIDING PRINCIPLES - May 2018

City-Wide Real Estate Transformation

GM26.17 REPORT FOR ACTION

Creative Approaches to Land Acquisition

SOUND TRANSIT RESOLUTION NO. R99-11

Approval of New Carrollton Joint Development Agreement

Barbara County Housing Element. Table 5.1 Proposed Draft Housing Element Goals, Policies and Programs

MUNICIPAL SERVICES PROJECT LAND ACQUISITION FRAMEWORK

CITY OF TORONTO. Response to the Provincial Inclusionary Zoning Consultation

OTTAWA COMMUNITY LANDS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement

Subject: Southwest Light Rail Transit (Green Line Extension) Initiate Condemnation on Parcels over $1 Million

Potential Property Impacts Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization

AGRICULTURAL LAND SOIL INVESTIGATION

Pine Hills. Pine Hills. Community Involvement Getting it Right

RENTAL, LEASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY

Hennepin County Department of. Housing, Community Works and Transit. Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Guidelines

Subject. Date: 2016/10/25. Originator s file: CD.06.AFF. Chair and Members of Planning and Development Committee

RECITALS STATEMENT OF AGREEMENT. Draft: November 30, 2018

DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT

City of Philadelphia POLICIES FOR THE SALE AND REUSE OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY. Approved By Philadelphia City Council on December 11, 2014

SOUND TRANSIT RESOLUTION NO. R

7. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

KENT COUNTY LAND BANK AUTHORITY REVIEW DECEMBER 2018

City of Winnipeg Housing Policy Implementation Plan

East Link Light Rail Cost-Savings Ideas

Civic San Diego Affordable Housing Master Plan

Prioritizing Publicly-Owned Lands as a Critical Resource For Affordable Housing Recommendations From GCC Public Lands Working to CASA

Real Estate Acquisitions Audit (Green Line LRT Stage 1)

Finance Department Real Estate Section Section SUBJECT: PROCEDURE - ACQUISITION, SALE, OR LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY BY THE CITY

OVERVIEW OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, LONDON (HDC)

NANTUCKET ISLANDS LAND BANK AFFORDABLE HOUSING POLICY Adopted by the vote of the Land Bank Commission on November 10, 2015

RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING A NEW COUNCIL POLICY No ENTITLED SURPLUS SALES

PLANNING FOR NEW TRANSIT NODES IN BELLEVUE

Update on the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Action Plan

MEMORANDUM DEBBIE MALICOAT, DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CONSULTANT AGREEMENTS FOR REAL ESTATE SERVICES

OFFICE OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

DATE: June 25, 2014 TO:

18 Sale and Other Disposition of Regional Lands Policy

Expropriation of 30 Newbridge Road and 36 North Queen Street

SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY

Land Consolidation Review Committee Annual Performance Report. April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010

12 REGIONAL CENTRES AND CORRIDORS PROGRAM UPDATE

1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE CIP VISION LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Municipal Act Planning Act...

ADOPTED BOARD OF SUPERVISORS COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

Board Meeting Handout ACCOUNTING FOR CONTINGENCIES September 6, 2007

CITY OF LOS ANGELES INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE. WA# C.F Date:

Creating a Brighter Future in the Post-Redevelopment Era

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE

5. Responsibilities. City Council

Jason Smith, Manager of Development Services Infill Development Draft Official Community Plan Amendment and Policy

Summary of Tower Road Property Planning and Maintenance

Rosslyn Sector Plan Implementation Zoning Ordinance Amendments. NAIOP Meeting April 13, 2016

Legal and Realty Services 2012 Annual Report

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. Between THE CITY OF SEATTLE. And THE CENTRAL PUGET SOUND REGIONAL TRANSIT AUTHORITY. Regarding

JOB DESCRIPTION MANAGEMENT EXCLUSION

Nassau County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Housing Element (H) Goals, Objectives and Policies. Goal

BALTIMORE REGIONAL FAIR HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2/19/13

Ideas + Action for a Better City learn more at SPUR.org. tweet about this #Oakland spubliclands

MEMPHIS HOUSING AUTHORITY 700 ADAMS AVENUE MEMPHIS, TN BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETING January 22, :00 P.M.

Glendale Housing Development Project Plan

MIAMI-DADE EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY PROPERTY ACQUISITION POLICY

Oregon, Brownfields, and the Land Bank and Tax Abatement Authorities. How Does It All Work And Why Cities and Counties Should Be Interested

How Municipalities Can Tackle the Challenge of Vacancy. October 18, 2015

CITY CLERK. Consolidated Clause in Policy and Finance Committee Report 7, which was considered by City Council on July 19, 20, 21 and 26, 2005.

Report by Capital Program, Planning and Real Estate Committee (B)

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

EMINENT DOMAIN Educational Series

A REPORT FROM THE OFFICE OF INTERNAL AUDIT

REAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT & MANAGEMENT

NOVA SCOTIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION BUSINESS PLAN

When the Plan is not Enough

Board Resolution -1- Month, Day, Year M E M O R A N D U M

Transcription:

MOTION NO. M2017-145 Capitol Hill Site D Agreement with Seattle Central College and Capitol Hill Housing MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: Board 11/16/2017 Final Action Don Billen, Acting Deputy Executive Director, PEPD Brooke Belman, Land Use Planning & Development Director Sarah Lovell, Transit Oriented Development Manager PROPOSED ACTION Authorizes the chief executive officer to (1) execute a Memorandum of Understanding with Seattle Central College and Capitol Hill Housing to exchange property in order to develop equitable transitoriented development in the Capitol Hill Station Area, and (2) negotiate a discounted property value in order to achieve affordable housing. KEY FEATURES SUMMARY Seattle Central College (SCC) has a right of first offer for Sound Transit s Site D TOD property (Site D) at Fair Market Value (FMV). SCC would like to acquire Site D from Sound Transit and has offered to provide two parcels that the college owns nearby, collectively known as the Atlas Site, as consideration for the transaction. SCC has identified the Atlas Site as surplus to their educational needs and had previously selected a developer, Capitol Hill Housing (CHH), to construct affordable housing on the property. Sound Transit and SCC propose to swap a Sound Transit-owned parcel (Site D) for two parcels (Atlas Site) owned by SCC. The details of the proposed swap are as follows: o The Atlas site, owned by SCC, is larger and has a higher unrestricted fair market value than Site D. SCC s developer, CHH, would pay the difference in the land values (approximately $2.2 million) to SCC and work with Sound Transit to develop a TOD project on the Atlas site. o Sound Transit and CHH will negotiate a land value for the Atlas Site that is less than the fair o market value of the property. The acquisition price paid by CHH (approximately $3.0 - $4.0 million) aims to facilitate the proposed land swap, set the land value within the competitive range for local affordable housing funding, and achieve fair market financial return to Sound Transit for the commercial component of the Atlas properties. Sound Transit, SCC, and CHH will negotiate site specific Purchase and Sale Agreements, which are anticipated to be ready for Board approval in 2019/2020. Developing affordable housing on the Atlas properties would result in the creation of approximately 34 additional affordable units beyond what could be accomplished on Site D. Site D, as developed by SCC, would be incorporated into an adjacent SCC-owned parcel and redeveloped as a primary entrance to the college and is anticipated to include additional classrooms, student services, bookstore, and faculty space. The SCC project would better connect students and faculty to Capitol Hill Station and support additional ridership as the college continues its growth.

BACKGROUND Sound Transit adopted a TOD Program Strategic Plan in 2010, and adopted a TOD Policy in December 2012 through Resolution No. R2012-24. Sound Transit updated its TOD strategic plan in 2014 to reflect the 2012 TOD Policy. The policy and strategic plan provide the foundation for how the agency approaches integrating transit infrastructure and local and regional land use development. The Capitol Hill Site D was identified in the 2010 and 2014 strategic plans as a TOD opportunity. In 2015, the state legislature amended the agency s enabling legislation, directing the agency to advance equitable TOD goals, setting forth specific financial and procedural requirements, and giving new tools to the agency to advance equitable development through prioritizing affordable housing in surplus property disposition. Those statute changes took effect upon the November 2016 voter-approved Sound Transit 3 Regional Transit System Plan. The agreement advances equitable Transit-Oriented Development goals at the Capitol Hill Station producing affordable housing, increasing ridership, and strengthening the physical integration of the station into the neighborhood while facilitating Seattle Central College s campus expansion plan. Property Sound Transit owns property (Site D) that consists of approximately 10,383 square feet and is located at 1827 Broadway, Seattle WA, adjacent to the west entrance of the Capitol Hill Station. Sound Transit purchased the properties that comprise Site D in 2007 for the University Link Extension. Federal Interest Sound Transit s Site D parcel was acquired with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding which includes 86.5 percent federal interest. Sound Transit intends to attribute the fair market value of Site D ($5.7 million) to another eligible grant and enter into the disposition process with FTA for Site D. This would extinguish the federal interest in Site D and alleviates any need to repay the FTA. First Right of Offer Seattle Central College (SCC) is the adjacent property owner to Site D and has a right to negotiate exclusively to purchase the Site D property from Sound Transit at fair market value. This right was obtained through negotiations when Sound Transit obtained tunnel easements from SCC for the University Link Extension. Development Agreement Site D is subject to the Development Agreement between Sound Transit and the City of Seattle should SCC not be the ultimate owner of the parcel. If SCC becomes the owner, the college s master plan supersedes the Development Agreement. The Coordinated Development Plan that was adopted with the Development Agreement showed approximately 44 units of housing could be developed on Site D if developed independently under a Development Agreement between Sound Transit and the City of Seattle should SCC not be the ultimate owner of Site D. Motion No. M2017-145 Page 2 of 5 Staff Report

Seattle Central College s Atlas Property SCC owns two parcels located south of Pine Street that represent a development opportunity in the Capitol Hill Station area, known as the Atlas Properties. SCC has concluded that the Atlas Properties are not ideal for campus expansion. In early 2017, SCC explored ways to accomplish Sound Transit s affordable housing requirements under RCW 81.112.350 and issued a Request for Interest to developers seeking proposals to develop the Atlas properties and participate in a ground lease. Through that process, SCC selected Capitol Hill Housing (CHH), who proposed to develop 78 units of workforce housing and ground floor retail on Broadway. In their proposal, CHH valued the commercial condo at $1 million. Affordable Housing Requirements RCW 81.112.350(b)(i) states that, unless certain exceptions apply, a minimum of eighty percent of [Sound Transit s] surplus property to be disposed or transferred, including air rights, that is suitable for development as housing, must be offered for either transfer at no cost, sale, or long-term lease first to qualified entities that agree to develop affordable housing on the property, consistent with local land use and zoning laws. The statute defines qualified entities as local governments, housing authorities, and non-profit developers. The statute requires that if a qualified entity accepts the property through the offer, then at least 80 percent of the housing units constructed would need to be affordable to those earning 80 percent of the area median income for the county in which the property is located. Capitol Hill Housing is a qualified entity and will meet the affordable housing requirements on the Atlas Site. Future Board Involvement Staff will seek Board approval of Purchase and Sale Agreements with Seattle Central College and Capitol Hill Housing, which are anticipated to be ready for Board approval in 2019/2020. FISCAL INFORMATION The agency s financial plan assumes $93.8 million of sales revenue from selected surplus real estate parcels of which approximately $32.1 million has been realized to date from the sale or lease of properties. The forecasted sales proceeds from all of the Capitol Hill properties is $24.9 million (2020$). Based on two transactions that have been authorized on Sites A, B-south, B-north, and C, the remaining value attributable to the Capitol Hill Site D property is $2.2 - $4.2 million. The current fair market value (FMV) of the Site D property is $5.7 million (2017$) for unrestricted use. However, restricting the land use to affordable housing significantly reduces the income potential and therefore the value of the property. In reducing the Capitol Hill Site D property value to facilitate affordable housing, the agency would need to realize approximately $57.5 million in future surplus real estate sales to achieve the forecast in the financial plan. SMALL BUSINESS/DBE PARTICIPATION AND APPRENTICESHIP UTILIZATION Not applicable to this action. Motion No. M2017-145 Page 3 of 5 Staff Report

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Sound Transit and the City of Seattle working collaboratively with the community beginning in 2008 to carefully consider the opportunities and constraints for the redevelopment at the Capitol Hill Link light rail station. Through that process, the community articulated desires for redevelopment and how those desires can build upon their vision for the neighborhood. Sound Transit and the City used a number of innovative techniques to incorporate that vision into the plans for redevelopment. The community s collective vision for the redevelopment opportunities is described in the Urban Design Framework (UDF). The Urban Design Framework provides a tool for the City and the Capitol Hill Community to work together with Sound Transit, Seattle Central Community College and other partners to leverage public and private actions to achieve the community s overall vision for the immediate Broadway Station area. This document, and the ideas it represents, played a key role influencing critical documents that govern the redevelopment of the sites. Sound Transit s Coordinated Development Plan described for developers how to address the physical design elements of the community s vision. Sound Transit and the City responded to the vision described in the UDF by incorporating many of those elements into a Development Agreement that codifies many aspects of the development on the site. Throughout the engagement process there was strong community support to include Site D as part of SCC s master plan. The UDF includes specific development guidance for Site D: Provide uses affiliated with the College according to the needs of the college. Engage the Broadway street frontage by locating pedestrian-generating active uses on the ground floor facing Broadway. Provide ground floor transparency along the Broadway frontage so as to further activate the street. A community organization known as the Capitol Hill Champion was formed in 2010 out of the Capitol Hill Chamber and the Capitol Hill Community Council to advocate for the community desires throughout the developer selection, design review, and construction of the sites. Numerous public meetings were held about the sites, including several meetings co-hosted by Sound Transit in collaboration with the Capitol Hill Champion. A series of stakeholder meetings with the Capitol Hill Chamber of Commerce Sub Committee on TOD (2008). Four community forums, each seeking input on a different topic: Community Uses (3/25/09), Housing and Retail (6/24/2009), Nagle Place, Farmer s market and parking (10/27/2009), and a summary of findings on (2/23/2010). A public workshop to discuss redevelopment options for Nagle Place (8/3/2010). A series of three public workshops to create the Urban Design Framework for Capitol Hill (2011). TIME CONSTRAINTS A one-month delay would not create a significant impact to the project schedule, but would delay the three parties from entering into negotiations. Delay in negotiations could impact the timing for Capitol Hill Housing to apply for funding and could delay SCC s redevelopment plan. PRIOR BOARD/COMMITTEE ACTIONS Motion No. M2017-145 Page 4 of 5 Staff Report

Resolution No. R2013-02: Approved the chief executive officer s declaration of surplus real property, including the method of disposition of selling the property and using the proceeds for the open University Link Extension Project, or other capital projects. Motion No. M2011-22: Authorized the chief executive officer to execute an exclusive negotiating agreement for a future purchase and sale agreement with the State Board of Community and Technical Colleges for a college related proposed transit oriented development project on potential future surplus property near the Capitol Hill Station Resolution No. R2010-17: Authorized the chief executive officer to acquire, dispose, or lease certain real property interests by negotiated purchase, by condemnation (including settlement), by condemnation litigation, or by administrative settlement; and to pay eligible relocation and reestablishment benefits to affected parties as necessary for construction, maintenance and operation of a light rail tunnel and stations between the University of Washington Station and the Pine Street Stub Tunnel and between the University of Washington Station and Northgate. Resolution No. R2007-19: Authorized the chief executive officer to acquire, dispose, or lease certain real property interests by negotiated purchase, by condemnation (including settlement), by condemnation litigation, or by administrative settlement; and to pay eligible relocation and reestablishment benefits to affected parties as necessary for construction, maintenance and operation of a light rail tunnel between the University of Washington Station and the Pine Street Stub Tunnel. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW KH 11/9/17 LEGAL REVIEW JB 11/13/17 Motion No. M2017-145 Page 5 of 5 Staff Report

MOTION NO. M2017-145 A motion of the Board of the Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority authorizing the chief executive officer to (1) execute a Memorandum of Understanding with Seattle Central College and Capitol Hill Housing to exchange property in order to develop equitable transit-oriented development in the Capitol Hill Station Area, and (2) negotiate a discounted property value in order to achieve affordable housing. BACKGROUND: Sound Transit adopted a Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Program Strategic Plan in 2010, and adopted a TOD Policy in December 2012 through Resolution No. R2012-24. Sound Transit updated its TOD strategic plan in 2014 to reflect the 2012 TOD Policy. The policy and strategic plan provide the foundation for how the agency approaches integrating transit infrastructure and local and regional land use development. The Capitol Hill Site D was identified in the 2010 and 2014 strategic plans as a TOD opportunity. In 2015, the state legislature amended the agency s enabling legislation, directing the agency to advance equitable TOD goals, setting forth specific financial and procedural requirements, and giving new tools to the agency to advance equitable development through prioritizing affordable housing in surplus property disposition. Those statute changes took effect upon the November 2016 voter-approved Sound Transit 3 Regional Transit System Plan. The agreement advances equitable Transit-Oriented Development goals at the Capitol Hill Station producing affordable housing, increasing ridership, and strengthening the physical integration of the station into the neighborhood while facilitating Seattle Central College s (SCC) campus expansion plan. SCC would like to acquire Site D from Sound Transit and has offered to provide two parcels that the college owns nearby, collectively known as the Atlas Site, as consideration for the transaction. SCC has identified the Atlas Site as surplus to their educational needs and had previously selected a developer, Capitol Hill Housing (CHH), to construct affordable housing on the property. Sound Transit and SCC propose to swap a Sound Transit-owned parcel (Site D) for two parcels (Atlas Site) owned by SCC. The details of the proposed swap are as follows: The Atlas site, owned by SCC, is larger and has a higher unrestricted fair market value than Site D. SCC s developer, CHH, would pay the difference in the land values (approximately $2.2 million) to SCC and work with Sound Transit to develop a TOD project on the Atlas site. Sound Transit and CHH will negotiate a land value for the Atlas Site that is less than the fair market value of the property. The acquisition price paid by CHH (approximately $3.0 - $4.0 million) aims to facilitate the proposed land swap, set the land value within the competitive range for local affordable housing funding, and achieve fair market financial return to Sound Transit for the commercial component of the Atlas properties. Developing affordable housing on the Atlas properties would result in the creation of approximately 34 additional affordable units beyond what could be accomplished on Site D. Site D, as developed by SCC, would be incorporated into an adjacent SCC-owned parcel and redeveloped as a primary entrance to the college and is anticipated to include additional classrooms, student services,

bookstore, and faculty space. The SCC project would better connect students and faculty to Capitol Hill Station and support additional ridership as the college continues its growth. Property Sound Transit owns property (Site D) that consists of approximately 10,383 square feet and is located at 1827 Broadway, Seattle WA, adjacent to the west entrance of the Capitol Hill Station. Sound Transit purchased the properties that comprise Site D in 2007 for the University Link Extension. Federal Interest Sound Transit s Site D parcel was acquired with Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding which includes 86.5 percent federal interest. Sound Transit intends to attribute the fair market value of Site D ($5.7 million) to another eligible grant and enter into the disposition process with FTA for Site D. This would extinguish the federal interest in Site D and alleviates any need to repay the FTA. First Right of Offer Seattle Central College (SCC) is the adjacent property owner to Site D and has a right to negotiate exclusively to purchase the Site D property from Sound Transit at fair market value. This right was obtained through negotiations when Sound Transit obtained tunnel easements from SCC for the University Link Extension. Development Agreement Site D is subject to the Development Agreement between Sound Transit and the City of Seattle should SCC not be the ultimate owner of the parcel. If SCC becomes the owner, the college s master plan supersedes the Development Agreement. A recent market study showed that approximately 44 units of housing could be developed on Site D if developed independently under a Development Agreement between Sound Transit and the City of Seattle should SCC not be the ultimate owner of Site D. Seattle Central College s Atlas Property SCC owns two parcels located south of Pine Street that represent a development opportunity in the Capitol Hill Station area, known as the Atlas Properties. SCC has concluded that the Atlas Properties are not ideal for campus expansion. In early 2017, SCC explored ways to accomplish Sound Transit s affordable housing requirements under RCW 81.112.350 and issued a Request for Interest to developers seeking proposals to develop the Atlas properties and participate in a ground lease. Through that process, SCC selected Capitol Hill Housing (CHH), who proposed to develop 78 units of workforce housing and ground floor retail on Broadway. In their proposal, CHH valued the commercial condo at $1 million. Affordable Housing Requirements RCW 81.112.350(b)(i) states that, unless certain exceptions apply, a minimum of eighty percent of [Sound Transit s] surplus property to be disposed or transferred, including air rights, that is suitable for development as housing, must be offered for either transfer at no cost, sale, or long-term lease first to qualified entities that agree to develop affordable housing on the property, consistent with Motion No. M2017-145 Page 2 of 3