CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE SIXTEENTH COUNCIL

Similar documents
Affordable Housing Advisory Committee Review of Recommendations. Planning and Development Department Community Development Division March 10, 2015

CITY OF SASKATOON COUNCIL POLICY

EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT OF THE CITY OF FELLSMERE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN APPENDIX D HOUSING ELEMENT


ASSEMBLY, No. 266 STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

7. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

ORDINANCE City of DeBary Comprehensive Plan Amendments Page 1 of 3

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER

The Bonus Zoning policy will be applied in conjunction with the Implementation policies contained within the Official Plan.

Community Revitalization Efforts 2016 Thresholds and Scoring Criteria

ROOSEVELT CITY. Finally, STRATEGIC ISSUES are ideas the City might want to consider when they conduct a formal update to their plan.

Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Department of Health, Housing & Community Services

Corporate Report. 2. That the Interim Control By-law prohibit within the Low Density Residential Suburban Neighbourhood (R1) zone, the following:

HOUSING ELEMENT I. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES

Chapter 4: Housing and Neighborhoods

B. Subarea Provisions, including the Design Elements and Area of Special Concern and Potential Park/Open Space/Recreation Requirements;

Housing Assistance Incentives Program

INCENTIVE POLICY FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING

SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM AMENDMENTS TO SECTION 415 INCLUSIONARY AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM

Nassau County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. Housing Element (H) Goals, Objectives and Policies. Goal

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO

Section 4 Master Plan Framework

Council Staff recommends approval of the attached SDC resolution, consistent with the results of the May 7 Bi-County meeting.

ORDINANCE NO

BYLAW a) To impose and provide for the payment of Off-site development levies;

1 #N7 AMX42TOD4BVTv1

BY AUTHORITY A BILL FOR AN ORDINANCE MAKING REVISIONS TO CHAPTERS 2 THROUGH 5 OF TITLE XI OF THE WESTMINSTER MUNICIPAL CODE

SECTION 7000 LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS

Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-

SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY

Comprehensive Housing Policy. City of Dallas, Texas

RECITALS. WHEREAS, the GMA requires counties to adopt county-wide planning policies in cooperation with cities within the County; and

CITY OF MADISON, WISCONSIN Responses to Questionnaire for HUD s Initiative on Removal of Regulatory Barriers: May 11, 2007 Status

[Disposition and Development Agreement - Seawall Lot 337 Associates, LLC - Mission Rock Project]

TOTTENHAM SECONDARY PLAN

Chapter 10: Implementation

Project: Address: MAJOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW

Sec Definitions. [Note: the long list of definitions related to Mobility will appear in the Handbook.]

City of Winnipeg Housing Policy Implementation Plan

City of Oakland Programs, Policies and New Initiatives for Housing

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

Public Portion: Mr. Bianchini opened the public portion. There being no comment, the public portion was closed. Resolutions:

Housing Conservation District Advisory Group

New Planning Code Summary: HOME-SF and Density Bonus Projects

Guidelines for Implementation of the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance of the City of San José, Chapter 5.08 of the San José Municipal Code.

b. providing adequate sites for new residential development

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for Senate Bill No. 2188

SANTA CLARA COUNTY RHNA SUBREGION TASK FORCE GUIDING PRINCIPLES - May 2018

APPENDIX D: DEFINITIONS

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

ASSEMBLY BILL No. 904

AN ORDINANCE BY COUNCILMEMBER JENNIFER N. IDE AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF ATLANTA ("CITY") TO ACQUIRE APPROXIMATELY 2.

Community Improvement Plan. Corporation of the City of Owen Sound

Glendale Housing Development Project Plan

ASSEMBLY, No STATE OF NEW JERSEY. 218th LEGISLATURE PRE-FILED FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 2018 SESSION

CITY OF OAKLAND IMPACT FEE ANNUAL REPORT FOR: Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2018

Treasure Island Development Program

MEMORANDUM! AGENDA ITEM #IV.C

4.13 Population and Housing

ADUs and You! Common types of ADUs include mother-in-law suite, garage apartments and finished basements.

El Cerrito Affordable Housing Strategy City Council Presentation August 15, 2017

Proposal to the City of Walnut Creek November 17, 2015 Riviera Family Apartments

Please review the Draft PTF Grant Manual with the above background information in mind. AGC

Regional Equity and Affordable Housing

HOUSING ELEMENT GOAL, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES

How to Adopt an Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC) Report

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA

HOUSING ELEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES, & POLICIES

ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF DALY CITY REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER RE: INCLUSIONARY HOUSING

ULI MN Regional Council of Mayors Housing Initiative 2017 Work Plan

NOTICE OF ADOPTED CHANGE TO A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR LAND USE REGULATION

City of Valdosta Land Development Regulations

CHAPTER V: IMPLEMENTING THE PLAN

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

Bunker Hill Part II Urban Design. Specific Plan. Case No. CPC SP TABLE OF CONTENTS

Bernalillo County Project Revenue Bond Application Approval. Bernalillo County Commission Board Meeting Date: September 27, 2016 A.

ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts

Generic Environmental Impact Statement. Build-Out Analysis. City of Buffalo, New York. Prepared by:

HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE CITY OF PEMBROKE PINES COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ADOPTION DOCUMENT

ORDINANCE NO

STAFF REPORT. Community Development Director PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076

RESOLUTION NO R-023

DONELSON TRANSIT-ORIENTED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN

San Francisco Business and Tax Regulations Code

Saskatchewan Municipal Financing Tools

1.0 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE OF THE CIP VISION LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY Municipal Act Planning Act...

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

City and County of San Francisco

WORK SESSION DOCUMENT

CITY OF VAUGHAN EXTRACT FROM COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF DECEMBER 11, 2012

Building Livable Communities with Transit. Introduction to Financing Livable Communities. Portland Lindbergh City Center Case Study

2. Rezone a portion of the lot from R2 (Small Lot Residential) to RD2 (Duplex: Housing Lane).

Zoning Regulations of the Town of Redding Connecticut

Title. This article shall be known and may be referred to as the "Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance of the Township of Montclair.

13 Sectional Map Amendment

Kinzie Industrial Corridor

Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231A Replacing the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231

FLORENCE NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION

Poughkeepsie City Center Revitalization Plan

STAFF REPORT NO

Transcription:

City of Albuquerque Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Government Center One Civic Plaza Albuquerque, NM 87102 Legislation Text File #: R-04-159, Version: 3 CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE SIXTEENTH COUNCIL COUNCIL BILL NO. F/S R-04-159 ENACTMENT NO. SPONSORED BY: MICHAEL CADIGAN RESOLUTION t ESTABLISHING INTERIM COUNCIL POLICY REGARDING LOWER IMPACT FEES DUE TO SERVICE EFFICIENCIES, REDUCTIONS/OFFSETS OF IMPACT FEES BASED ON CITY PLANNING POLICIES, AND IMPACT FEE WAIVERS FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING. b WHEREAS, Section 14-13-1-4 ROA 1994 of the Planned Growth Strategy (PGS) Ordinance states, Impact fees, Utility Expansion Charges, and other development related charges are key strategic tools for implementing the Planned Growth Strategy and the City/County Comprehensive Plan ; and WHEREAS, the Impact Fee consultants have prepared schedules of development impact fees based on the full marginal cost of growth within tiers and services areas; and WHEREAS, Section 14-13-4(C) ROA 1994 calls for the first step in the development of impact fees to be their calculation based upon the full marginal cost of growth; and WHEREAS, Section 14-13-4(D) ROA 1994 states Impact fees, including the incorporated Utility Expansion Charges shall be reduced based upon a schedule, to be created, of facility and infrastructure efficiencies that result from the nature and location of the types of development. Non-exclusive examples include projects that result in jobs closer to predominately residential areas, mixed use projects, neighborhood commercial centers, activity centers consistent with the City/County Comprehensive Plan, higher density housing, City of Albuquerque Page 1 of 5

affordable housing with smaller lot sizes and fewer utility fixtures ; and WHEREAS, Section 14-13-4(E) ROA 1994 further states Impact fees, including the incorporated Utility Expansion Charges, shall be partially or completely waived based upon developments that are consistent with the policies contained in the Planned Growth Strategy as adopted, the City/County Comprehensive Plan, and other policies and recommendations in area plans, metropolitan redevelopment plans, neighborhood and sector development plans, center and corridor plans, and for affordable housing and for new zoning objectives as described in Resolution R-02-111 as adopted. These waivers shall be provided using a policybased ranking system ; and WHEREAS, the Council is authorized to adopt development impact fee ordinances pursuant to Sections 5-8-1 NMSA 1978 et seq., and is authorized to direct that impact fees be reduced based on adopted policies and is authorized to direct that impact fees be lowered based on efficiencies. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL, THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE: Section 1. The City shall develop schedules of lower impact fees based on efficiencies and reduced impact fees based on adopted policies. These schedules shall be based on the following policies: A. Development must be within the Water Service Area and consistent with the City of Albuquerque's approved land use assumptions for impact fees to receive lower impact fees or reduced impact fees. B. Jobs-Housing Balance. 1. There shall be lower or reduced impact fees for certain service areas as depicted in F/S2 O-04-71 (Appendix A). The service areas where these reductions shall be in effect are: SW MESA, W MESA and NW MESA. These reductions are based on research that indicates that significant reductions in Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) can be achieved through a balance of approximately 1 job per 2.5 persons. 2. Adjustment. For every new building housing the following uses, the Roadway Facilities Impact Fee will be reduced as follows: Industrial or Manufacturing 70% reduction Institutional 60% reduction Office 50% reduction City of Albuquerque Page 2 of 5

Lodging, Retail, or Quality Restaurant 30% reduction 3. The lower/reduced fees identified in Section 1.B.2. shall be reviewed for modification when the new land use zones identified in Section 3, including lower and reduced impact fee schedules, have been approved by the City. The terms in this section shall have the same meaning as the terms in F/S O-04-71 Appendix B. The Mayor shall promulgate regulations to implement the above schedule within 60 days of the enactment of this Resolution. C. Area Plans, Metropolitan Redevelopment Plans, Neighborhood and Sector Development Plans, Center and Corridor Plans. 1. Schedules of lower impact fees based on efficiencies and reduced impact fees shall be developed to foster the implementation of area plans, redevelopment plans, neighborhood and sector development plans, and center and corridor plans. These schedules shall be reviewed through one or more public hearings with affected stakeholders prior to consideration by the City Council. 2. Metropolitan Redevelopment Areas. No impact fees shall be charged for non-residential development within Metropolitan Redevelopment Areas that conforms to the MRA Plan and any applicable Sector Development and Area Plan subject to the review of the Planning Director. Impact fees for all owner-occupied housing affordable to households earning 80% or less of Area Median Income spending 30% of income on PITI (principal and interest as well as taxes and insurance) within Metropolitan Redevelopment Areas shall be waived. D. Impact Fee Waivers for Economic Based Development Projects. 1. Impact Fees may be waived for projects that meet the following criteria: Development that has received City Council approval for or subject to Industrial Revenue Bonds, Metropolitan Redevelopment Bonds or the Local Economic Development Act (Section 5-10-1 et seq. NMSA 1978) and an economic impact analysis has been conducted for the development that indicates a positive economic impact on the City. Section 2. Waiver of Impact Fee for Affordable Housing. 1. Impact fees shall be completely or partially waived based on policies that support both affordable housing and stable neighborhoods. As used in this Resolution, affordable housing means housing owned and occupied, or rented by households earning a defined percentage of Area Median Income (AMI) spending no more than 30% of household City of Albuquerque Page 3 of 5

income on housing costs defined as PITI (principal and interest as well as taxes and insurance). The defined percentage of AMI is identified in each subsection that follows. 2. Impact fees for owner-occupied housing affordable to households earning 80% or less of AMI within Metropolitan Redevelopment Areas shall be completely waived. 3. Impact fees for owner-occupied housing affordable to households earning 80% or less of Area Median Income within Planned Village Development Zones and Infill Development Zones shall be completely waived. 4. Impact fees for mixed-income projects. Impact fees for the affordable units in projects located within adopted Centers and Corridors (excluding proposed centers and corridors) as identified in Figure 20 of the Albuquerque/Bernalillo County Comprehensive Plan shall be waived completely. Impact fees for affordable units within mixed income projects located elsewhere shall be waived 60%. The term "mixed-income projects" is defined as below: a. For owner occupied housing: not less than 20% or more than 50% of the total owner occupied units in the development affordable to households earning 80% or less of AMI and at least 40% remaining units affordable at 120% or more of AMI, and b. For rental housing: not less than 20% or more than 40% of the total rental units in the development affordable to households earning 60% or less of AMI and at least 30% of the total units serving families at 80% or more of AMI. 5. Impact fees for housing affordable to households earning 30% or less of AMI shall be completely waived. 6. Regulations shall be established in order for the affordability requirements to remain in effect for the homes and projects which receive the affordable housing waivers. Such regulations shall consider deed restrictions or other mechanisms to insure long term affordability and shall be adopted prior to the initiation of development impact fee charges. c. Any properties under the jurisdiction of FAA Grant Assurances shall have impact fees reduced 100%. Section 3. Pursuant to PGS Bill No. F/S R-02-111 (Enactment No. 112-2002), there will be impact fee reductions for the Commercial Center Zone, the Campus Zone, the Conservation Subdivision Zone, the Transit-Oriented Development / Corridor Zone, Planned Village Development Zone, and Infill Development Zone which shall be adopted when such zones are approved by the Council. The schedules for impact fees shall be calculated first City of Albuquerque Page 4 of 5

based upon on efficiencies and second, upon adopted policies. Section 4. Policy Basis. The policy basis for these reductions is contained in the City/County Comprehensive Plan, Bill No. R-70, Interim Growth Policy ; Bill No. R-55, Centers and Corridors ; Bill No. R-17, Infill Development Task Force, Bill No. O-34-2002, Adopting Elements of a Planned Growth Strategy, Bill No. O-47-2003, Adopting an Infrastructure and Growth Plan, the West Side Strategic Plan, and other area plans, redevelopment plans, neighborhood and sector development plans. Section 5. One mill of the City's property tax that was allocated temporarily to the General Fund to alleviate the budget short-fall in FY/05 shall be returned from the General Fund (Fund 110) to the Capital Improvement Fund (Fund 305) beginning as soon as practicable to July 1, 2005 for the FY/06 budget. The revenues represented by this one mill in the Capital Improvement Program shall be used exclusively for street rehabilitation, street deficiency correction, and for pedestrian improvements including, but not limited to, missing sidewalks, pedestrian streetscape enhancements, shortened street crossing distances across arterials and collectors, bulb outs, textured pavements on cross walks, widened sidewalks, landscaping, façade improvements, and so on as allowed by Statute. These new funds shall not offset current spending levels for the street rehabilitation and deficiency correction program funded through property tax and other revenue sources. Section 6. Review and re-evaluate R-159 six months after enactment. X:\share\leg\16\r-159fsfin. City of Albuquerque Page 5 of 5