PLANNING REPORT Gordon Street City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of Ontario Inc. March 17, Project No. 1507

Similar documents
PLANNING REPORT. 33 Arkell Road City of Guelph. Prepared on behalf of OHM Arkell Inc. August 4, Project No. 1327

Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services

PLANNING REPORT. Starwood Drive and Watson Parkway North City of Guelph. Coletara Development. November 12, Project No. 1307

Planning Justification Report

3.1. OBJECTIVES FOR RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATIONS GENERAL OBJECTIVES FOR ALL RESIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS

PLANNING RATIONALE 680 BRONSON AVENUE OTTAWA, ONTARIO PROPOSED ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT

MINTO COMMUNITIES INC. AVALON WEST STAGE 4 PLANNING RATIONALE. July Prepared for:

For Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario

P. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management

8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District

Planning Justification Report - Update Castlegrove Subdivision, Gananoque Draft Plan of Subdivision and Class III Development Permit

Keele Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Planning and Building Department

INNOVATIVE PLANNING SOLUTIONS

50+54 BELL STREET NORTH

Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Site Plan Control

111 Plunkett Road (formerly part of 135 Plunkett Road) - Zoning By-law Amendment Application and Plan of Subdivision Application - Preliminary Report

Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District ESC 44 OZ & ESC 44 SB

AMENDMENT NUMBER 38 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WEST LINCOLN (COMPLIANCE)

770 BROOKFIELD ROAD Site Plan Control Atlantis Investments November 2017

1202 & 1204 Avenue Road Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE

Islington Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment

111 Wenderly Drive Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING THE CERTIFICATE PAGE FOR AMENDMENT NO. 89 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF KING

Zoning Amendment. Public Meeting: February 7, 2018

Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services

Application for a Zoning By-law Amendment, ZBA , Zelinka Priamo Ltd, on behalf of HLH Investments Inc.; Ilderton Road

PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT INNOVATIVE PLANNING SOLUTIONS. Centreville Stroud Yonge Street, Stroud. Town of Innisfil

Residential. Infill / Intensification Development Review

Mr. Trevor Hawkins Development Planner Development Services City of Waterloo 100 Regina Street South Waterloo, ON N2J 4A8. Dear Mr.

1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

50 and 52 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

PIN , Part 1, Plan SR-713 in Lot 2, Concession 5, Township of McKim (1096 Dublin Street, Sudbury)

Ashcroft Homes Trim Road Development Planning Rationale

307 Sherbourne Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

5219 Upper Middle Road, Burlington

1555 Midland Avenue - Zoning Amendment & Subdivision Applications - Preliminary Report

STAFF REPORT PLN September 11, 2017

Housing & Residential Intensification Study Discussion Paper Township of King

250, 252, 254 and 256 Royal York Road and 8 and 10 Drummond Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Members of the City of Brantford Committee of Adjustment. 1.0 TYPE OF REPORT Committee of Adjustment Decision Regarding an Application for Consent

12, 14, 16 and 18 Marquette Avenue and 7 Carhartt Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Municipality of Brockton Planning Report

Staff Report. Recommendations: Background:

The City of Burlington 4880 VALERA ROAD PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT. December 2017 ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT. AJC Project Number:

1 Blue Goose Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Application for a Zoning By-law Amendment, Zelinka Priamo Ltd, on behalf of HLH Investments Inc.; Ilderton Road

25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

10 St Mary Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Yonge Street and 3 Gerrard Street East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Planning Justification Report

PLANNING REPORT. Prepared for: John Spaleta 159 Delatre Street Woodstock Ontario N4S 6C2

20 Edward Street Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

836 St Clair Ave W - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

3390, 3392, 3394, 3396 and 3398 Bayview Avenue - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Sheppard Ave East and 6, 8 and 10 Greenbriar Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report

Changing Lanes: The City of Toronto s Review of Laneway Suites City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Final Report

Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Peter Street and 357 Richmond Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Corporate Report OZ 07/022 W7. DATE: January 13, Chair and Members of Planning and Development Committee Meeting Date: February 2, 2009 TO:

DATE: April 26, 2017 REPORT NO. CD Members of the City of Brantford Committee of Adjustment

507, 509 and 511 Kingston Road - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications Request for Interim Directions Report

PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT

25 Vickers Road, 5555 and 5559 Dundas Street West and 10 Shorncliffe Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report

Bylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT

PLANNING REPORT THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF COBOURG

PLANNING REPORT. Lot 5, SDR Lot 6 and 7 Concession 3 Township of Normanby Municipality of West Grey County of Grey

Urban Design Brief. Italian Seniors Project 1090, 1092, 1096 Hamilton Road City of London

355 King St W and 119 Blue Jays Way - OPA & Rezoning Applications - Preliminary Report

4650 Eglinton Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Planning Justification Report

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake Official Plan Review. Discussion Paper: Second Residential Units. Prepared for: The Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake

6. RESIDENTIAL ZONE REGULATIONS

Corporate Report. Report from Planning and Building Services, Planning Services. Date of Report: March 17, 2015 Date of Meeting: April 13, 2015

The Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON

REDEVELOPMENT OF 403 TWEEDSMUIR AVENUE

Urban Design Brief Dundas Street. London Affordable Housing Foundation. November Zelinka Priamo Ltd.

6208 Jeanne D Arc Boulevard North. Planning Rationale. Site Plan Control

2306 St. Clair Avenue West Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Paul D. Ralph, BES, RPP, MCIP, Commissioner, Development Services Department

31, 33 and 35 Wilmington Avenue, Rezoning Application - Final Report

17-23 Clairtrell Road and 391 Spring Garden Avenue - OPA & Rezoning, Site Plan - Preliminary Report

DECISION AND ORDER APPEARANCES. Decision Issue Date Thursday, March 22, 2018

STAFF REPORT PLN December 9, 2013

Yonge Street, 5-9 St. Joseph Street and 11-19, 25 St. Nicholas Street Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report

PREPARED FOR: ADI DEVELOPMENT GROUP INC.

CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT

HOUSING ISSUES REPORT

CENTENNIAL NEIGHBOURHOODS SECONDARY PLAN STUDY. City of Hamilton

166 Clinton Street Zoning Amendment Application Preliminary Report

SUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard

Montreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]

Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

150 Eglinton Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

STAFF REPORT. January 25, North York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, North District

6040 Bathurst Street and 5 Fisherville Road Zoning Bylaw Amendment Application Preliminary Report

Brooklin Study Secondary Plan and Transportation Master Plan Background Report: Potential Intensification Opportunities

Transcription:

PLANNING REPORT 1131 Gordon Street City of Guelph Prepared on behalf of 1876698 Ontario Inc. March 17, 2016 Project No. 1507 423 Woolwich Street, Suite 201, Guelph, Ontario, N1H 3X3 Phone (519) 836-7526 Fax (519) 836-9568 Email astrid.clos@ajcplanning.ca

Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Description of the Proposal 1 3. Existing Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses 2 4. Planning Framework 3 4.1 Provincial Policy Statement (2014) 3 4.2 Places to Grow 4 4.3 City of Guelph Official Plan (September 2014 Consolidation) 5 4.4 Envision Guelph Draft Official Plan (OPA No. 48) 8 4.5 Zoning By-law 9 5. Conclusion 11 Figures Figure 1 - Proposed Concept Plan 1 Figure 2 - Proposed Building Elevations 2 Figure 3 Surrounding Land Use 3 Figure 4 Guelph Official Plan 6 Figure 5 Official Plan Criteria to Evaluate a Townhouse Proposal 7 Figure 6 OPA No. 48 Land Use Schedule 9 Figure 7 Zoning Compliance 10 Figure 8 Existing Zoning 11

1. Introduction This report has been prepared in support of a zone change application for the property municipally addressed as 1131 Gordon Street, City Guelph and legally described as, Part of Lots 4 and 5, Concession 7 (Geographic Township of Puslinch) City of Guelph. The subject property is owned by 1876698 Ontario Inc. The total area of the property subject to this zone change application is 0.184 hectares. A pre-consultation meeting was held with the City on November 18, 2015. This Planning Report was requested by the City as a requirement for a complete application. 2. Description of the Proposal The current zoning of the property is the R.1B Zone which does not permit Stacked Townhouses. A zone change application is therefore been submitted to change the zoning to the R.3A Zone. As shown by the proposed Concept Plan included as Figure 1, 16 stacked townhouse units are proposed. The building is proposed to be three storeys in height. Each unit has one garage parking space. 4 visitor parking spaces are provided. The proposed Concept Plan was prepared by Lee Associates Architects Corp. on February 24, 2016. Figure 1 Proposed Concept Plan

Specialized Zoning Regulations being requested: 2 Minimum Lot Area per Dwelling Unit of 115 m 2. Minimum Front yard of 4.5 m. At Grade Minimum Private Amenity Area setback 2.5 m from the lot line. Maximum Number of Dwellings in a Row of 16. Maximum Density of the Site of 87 units per hectare. Figure 2 - Proposed Building Elevations The east building elevation as shown in Figure 2 includes a front door and windows facing onto the Gordon Street frontage. A porch with a sidewalk providing direct access to the municipal sidewalk is planned. A sidewalk accessing the entrances to the remainder of the units also is proposed to connect with the municipal sidewalk as shown on Figure 1 the proposed Concept Plan. 3. Existing Conditions and Surrounding Land Uses The property has an existing single detached dwelling on the property which is proposed to be demolished. The subject property is not included on the Municipal Register of Cultural Heritage Properties nor has the existing house been designated.

The existing surrounding land uses include: 3 North - East - South - West - Single detached dwellings on the corner of Gordon Street and Harts Lane. Gordon Street and single detached dwellings. Cluster townhouse dwellings in the R.3A-34 Zone. Rear yards of single detached dwellings fronting onto Harts Lane. Figure 3 - Surrounding Land Use 4. Planning Framework 4.1 Provincial Policy Statement 2014 The Provincial Policy Statement 2014 (PPS) is issued under the authority of Section 3 of the Planning Act and was in effect as of April 30, 2014. It replaces the Provincial Policy Statement issued March 1, 2005. In respect of the exercise of any authority that affects a planning matter, section 3 of the Planning Act requires that decisions affecting planning matters shall be consistent with policy statements issued under the Act. The Provincial Policy Statement is more than a set of individual policies. It is to be read in its entirety and the relevant policies are to be applied to each situation. When more than one policy is relevant, a decision-maker should consider all of the relevant policies to understand how they work together. The language of each policy, including the Implementation and Interpretation policies, will assist decision-makers in understanding how the policies are to be implemented.

Provincial plans are to be read in conjunction with the Provincial Policy Statement. They take precedence over the policies of the Provincial Policy Statement to the extent of any conflict, except where the relevant legislation provides otherwise. The Provincial Policy Statement provides policy direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. (bolding added for emphasis) 1.1.3 Settlement Areas 1.1.3.1 Settlement areas shall be the focus of growth and their vitality and regeneration shall be promoted. 1.1.3.2 Land use patterns within settlement areas shall be based on: a. densities and a mix of land uses which: 1. efficiently use land and resources; 2. are appropriate for, and efficiently use, the infrastructure and public service facilities which are planned or available, and avoid the need for their unjustified and/or uneconomical expansion; and 3. minimize negative impacts to air quality and climate change, and promote energy efficiency in accordance with policy 1.8; and b. a range of uses and opportunities for intensification and redevelopment in accordance with the criteria in policy 1.1.3.3,where this can be accommodated. 1.6.3 a) The use of existing infrastructure and public service facilities should be optimized; 1.6.6.2 Municipal sewage services and municipal water services are the preferred form of servicing for settlement areas. Intensification and redevelopment within settlement areas on existing municipal sewage services and municipal water services should be promoted, wherever feasible. The site will be serviced with municipal sewage and water services consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. The proposal for the subject property is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement 2014 in that land within the settlement area should be efficiently used. 4.2 Places to Grow Pursuant to the Places to Grow Act, 2005: the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2006 was approved by the Lieutenant Governor in Council, Order-in-Council No 1221/2006 took effect on June 16, 2006; minor amendments were made to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2006 by Minister s Order dated December 19, 2011; and Amendment 1 (2012) to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2006, was approved by the Lieutenant Governor in Council, Order-in-Council No 1702/2011 to take effect on January 19, 2012. Amendments 1 and 2 have been approved and are in effect. 4

Excerpts from the Growth Plan are included in the report. Bolding has been added for emphasis. The Growth Plan directs growth through intensification to the built-up area in a compact and efficient form that optimizes the use of municipal infrastructure. 1.2.2 Guiding Principles The vision for the Greater Golden Horseshoe is grounded in the following principles that provide the basis for guiding decisions on how land is developed, resources are managed and public dollars invested: Build compact, vibrant and complete communities. Optimize the use of existing and new infrastructure to support growth in a compact, efficient form. The proposal for the subject property will assist the City to meet the Places to Grow principle to build in a compact and efficient form within the built-up area. 4.3 City of Guelph Official Plan (September 2014 Consolidation) The property is designated General Residential in the current Official Plan. Multiple unit residential buildings such as stacked townhouses are permitted in the General Residential designation. Multiple unit residential buildings are permitted without an amendment to the Official Plan, subject to the satisfaction of specific development criteria as noted by the provisions of policy 7.2.7. The net density of development shall not exceed 100 units per hectare. The proposed density of 87 units per hectare is less than the maximum permitted density of 100 units per hectare. 'General Residential' Land Use Designation 7.2.31 The predominant use of land in areas designated, as 'General Residential' on Schedule 1 shall be residential. All forms of residential development shall be permitted in conformity with the policies of this designation. The general character of development will be lowrise housing forms. Multiple unit residential buildings will be permitted without amendment to this Plan, subject to the satisfaction of specific development criteria as noted by the provisions of policy 7.2.7. Residential care facilities, lodging houses, coach houses and garden suites will be permitted, subject to the development criteria as outlined in the earlier text of this subsection. 7.2.32 Within the 'General Residential' designation, the net density of development shall not exceed 100 units per hectare (40 units/acre). 7.2.7 Multiple unit residential buildings, such as townhouses, row dwellings and apartments, may be permitted within designated areas permitting residential uses. The following development criteria will be used to evaluate a development proposal for multiple unit housing: a) That the building form, massing, appearance and siting are compatible in design, character and orientation with buildings in the immediate vicinity; 5

b) That the proposal can be adequately served by local convenience and neighbourhood shopping facilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities and public transit; c) That the vehicular traffic generated from the proposal can be accommodated with minimal impact on local residential streets and intersections and, in addition, vehicular circulation, access and parking facilities can be adequately provided; and d) That adequate municipal infrastructure, services and amenity areas for the residents can be provided. Figure 4 Guelph Official Plan 6 Townhouse proposals must be evaluated using the criteria in section 7.2.7 of the Official Plan. The evaluation of the proposal using these criteria is found in Figure 5. The proposed stacked townhouse proposal at 1131 Gordon Street meets the evaluation criteria of section 7.2.7.

7 Figure 5 - Official Plan Criteria to Evaluate a Townhouse Proposal 7.2.7 Multiple unit residential buildings, such as townhouses, row dwellings and apartments, may be permitted within designated areas permitting residential uses. The following development criteria will be used to evaluate a development proposal for multiple unit housing: Official Plan Policy a) That the building form, massing, appearance and siting are compatible in design, character and orientation with buildings in the immediate vicinity; b) That the proposal can be adequately served by local convenience and neighbourhood shopping facilities, schools, parks and recreation facilities and public transit; c) That the vehicular traffic generated from the proposal can be accommodated with minimal impact on local residential streets and intersections and, in addition, vehicular circulation, access and parking facilities can be adequately provided; and d) That adequate municipal infrastructure, services and amenity areas for the residents can be provided. Analysis The proposed 3 storey building has a form, massing, appearance and siting which is compatible in design, character and orientation with buildings in the immediate vicinity of the site. The abutting property located to the south is developed as cluster townhouses. The proposed townhouses back onto these existing cluster townhouses which have a setback of 19.5 m from the lot line. The proposed three storey building height is compatible with the abutting single detached homes located to the north and east. Shopping facilities are available to the north along Gordon Street. Public and separate schools are located in proximity to the site. Guelph Transit provides bus service along Gordon Street. Traffic generated from the proposal will use Gordon Street, an arterial road, for access with no traffic impact on local residential streets. Schedule 9A: EXISTING ROAD NETWORK in the Official Plan shows Gordon Street as an arterial road. The report prepared by GM Blue Plan evaluates the municipal infrastructure available to service the proposal. Schedule 1B Growth Plan Elements of the Official Plan includes the subject property within the Built-up Area and within the Intensification Corridor along Gordon Street. The Official Plan anticipates higher residential densities within the built-up area within intensification corridors to ensure the viability of existing and planned transit service levels. 2.4.4 Settlement Area Boundary The City s future development to the year 2031 will be accommodated with the City s settlement area boundary identified on Schedule 1B of this Plan. 2.4.4.1 The City will meet the forecasted growth within the settlement area through: b) intensifying generally within the built-up area, with higher densities within Downtown Guelph, the community mixed use nodes and within the identified intensification corridors;

2.4.8 Intensification Corridors 8 Intensification Corridors are identified on Schedule 1B of this Plan and will be planned to provide for mixed-use development in proximity to transit services at appropriate locations. 2.4.8.1 Intensification corridors will be planned to achieve: a) increased residential and employment densities that support and ensure the viability of existing and planned transit service levels; The proposal is in conformity with the policies of the General Residential designation. The proposed density of 87 units per hectare is less than the maximum permitted density of 100 units per hectare. The proposed stacked townhouse proposal at 1131 Gordon Street meets the evaluation criteria of section 7.2.7. The Official Plan anticipates higher residential densities within the built-up area within intensification corridors to ensure the viability of existing and planned transit service levels. 4.4 Envision Guelph Draft Official Plan (OPA No. 48) Official Plan Amendment No. 48 is the 5 year review of the Guelph Official Plan. OPA No. 48 has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board and is not in effect. OPA No. 48 proposes to designate the subject property as Medium Density Residential. OPA No. 48 proposes to designate the subject property as Medium Density Residential. Apartments are a permitted use within this designation. The proposed maximum height of 5 storeys is within the range of permitted building heights of 2 to 6 storeys. The proposed density of 98.09 units per hectare is within the permitted net density range of 35 to 100 units per hectare within this designation. 9.3.4 Medium Density Residential The use of land within the Medium Density Residential designation will be medium density housing forms. Permitted Uses 1. The following uses may be permitted subject to the applicable provisions of this Plan: Height and Density i) multiple unit residential buildings, such as townhouses and apartments. 2. The minimum height is two (2) storeys and the maximum height is six (6) storeys. 3. The maximum net density is 100 units per hectare and not less than a minimum net density of 35 units per hectare. The proposed 3 storey building height is within the permitted range of building heights within the Medium Density Residential designation. The proposed density of 87 units per hectare is within the permitted range of the Medium Density Residential designation.

Figure 6 - OPA No. 48 Land Use Schedule 9 4.5 Zoning By-law The current zoning of the property is the R.1B Zone which permits the following uses: Single Detached Dwelling Accessory Apartment in accordance with Section 4.15.1 Bed and Breakfast establishment in accordance with Section 4.27 Day Care Centre in accordance with Section 4.26 Group Home in accordance with Section 4.25 Home Occupation in accordance with Section 4.19 Lodging House Type 1 in accordance with Section 4.25

Figure 7 - Zoning Compliance 10 R.3A Stacked Townhouse Zone Zoning Regulation Required Provided Compliance Minimum Lot Area 1,000 m 2 1,846 m 2 Yes Minimum Lot Area per Dwelling 150 m 2 115 m 2 No Minimum Lot Frontage 18 m 27 m Yes Minimum Front Yard 6 m 4.5 m No Minimum Side Yard 6 m 7 m Yes Half the building height Minimum Rear Yard 7.5 m 14.4 m Yes Minimum Building Coverage 40% 27.8 % Yes (514 m 2 ) Maximum Building Height 3 storeys 3 storeys Yes Minimum Common Amenity Area Not required for Not required N/A 16 units for 16 units Minimum Private Amenity Area Minimum area of 20 m 2 Yes At Grade 20 m 2 Be 4.5 m in 4.5 m Yes depth Be defined by a Defined by a Yes wall or fence wall or fence. Be 3m from a lot 2.5 m No Minimum Private Amenity Area Above Grade line Minimum area of 10 m 2 Yes 10 m 2 Be defined by a wall or railing minimum height of 1.8 m Defined by a railing. Minimum Landscaped Open Space 40% 40% Yes Buffer Strip fence fence Yes Off-Street Parking 20 parking spaces 1.2 per unit 20 parking spaces (including 4 Yes visitor spaces) Maximum Number of Dwellings in a Row 12 16 No Maximum Density of Site 60 units per 87 units per No hectare hectare Specialized Zoning Regulations being requested: Minimum Lot Area per Dwelling Unit of 115 m 2. Minimum Front yard of 4.5 m. At Grade Minimum Private Amenity Area setback of 2.5 m from the lot line. Maximum Number of Dwellings in a Row of 16. Maximum Density of the Site of 87 units per hectare. Yes

The zoning proposal is described further in section 2 of this report. 11 Figure 8 - Existing Zoning 5. Conclusion This Planning Report has been prepared in support of a Zoning Amendment Application for the property municipally addressed as 1131 Gordon Street. The proposed zone change is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and the Growth Plan, is in conformity with both the in effect and adopted Official Plan and in my professional opinion represents good planning. This report has been prepared and respectfully submitted by, March 17, 2016 Astrid Clos, RPP, MCIP Date (1507.Planning Report.doc)