Impact of Building Byelaws on Housing: A Comparative Study of Development Control Rules of Jaipur and Pune

Similar documents
REVIEW OF LAND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN URBAN GROWTH PERSPECTIVE

A Study on Housing Growth Pattern in West Zone of Surat City

The following recommendations were made by the committee in the first meeting held on

Staff Report. Port Hood Area Advisory Committee Inverness Planning Advisory Committee Inverness County Council. To: Planning Staff (EDPC) From:

Performance Check of Urban Land Management Policies With Sustainability Indicators

Estimating Poverty Thresholds in San Francisco: An SPM- Style Approach

Land Based Financing Options in Indian Cities

MASTER PLAN PROVISIONS (1st, 2nd & 3rd MASTER PLANS)

Is FSI Dependent on Land Availability and Densities? A Comparative Review of FSI in Indian Cities

CHALLANGES OF VALUING IN INDIA

S L U M R E H A B I L I T A T I O N A U T H O R I T Y M U M B A I M A H A R A S H T R A I N D I A M A R C H 2 1 ST

Orange Water and Sewer Authority Water and Sewer System Development Fee Study

STAFF REPORT. Permit Number: Porter. Kitsap County Board of Commissioners; Kitsap County Planning Commission

1 August 12, 2015 Public Hearing

1. Multi-family dwellings, including town homes, apartments, or condominiums.

Land policies and land reforms in China: current situation and lessons to be learned for the future Dr. Michael Klaus

1970 Victoria Park Avenue and 9 Clintwood Gate Zoning By-law Amendment Application Preliminary Report

BOWEN ISLAND MUNICIPALITY BYLAW NO. 440, A Bylaw to amend Land Use Bylaw No. 57, 2002

06.09 Urban Structural Density (2017 Edition)

25 N 23rd STREET COMMERCIAL-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

Presentation. Agenda Item # 1. Meeting Date February 3, Erkin Ozberk, Planner. Prepared By. Brian T. Kenner City Manager.

AFFORDABLE HOUSING. April 2018 I Volume 32

Missing Middle Housing Types Showcasing examples in Springfield, Oregon

PIP practice note 1 planning assumptions. How to use this practice note. Planning assumptions. What are planning assumptions? Type.

Implementation. Approved Master Plan and SMA for Henson Creek-South Potomac 103

ARTICLE B ZONING DISTRICTS

County Survey. results of the public officials survey in the narrative. Henry County Comprehensive Plan,

Outline. Property taxes-general. Tax concept. Property taxes-liabilities. authorizations. Property taxes-authorizations

PLANNING 101. What architects think I do. the what s and how s of land use planning

Appendix B. Density Definitions. Densification Definition and Concepts

LAND MONITOR REPORT

3035 Weston Road - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Directions Report

Welcome. City of Abbotsford Zoning Bylaw Update. June 25 th obtain your feedback on key changes to the Bylaw.

1 November 13, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER: HOME ASSOCIATES OF VIRGINIA, INC.

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS

Registering Property

INSTRUCTIONS TO PRIVATE DEVELOPERS

EXHIBIT B FINDINGS OF FACT BEND DEVELOPMENT CODE (BDC) UPDATE AMENDMENT PZ

PP requested to consider the project on 19/09/2016; Committee accepted

AHMEDABAD BUS RAPID TRANSIT SYSTEM (ART)

City of Independence

GENERAL PURPOSES OF ZONES

Director, Community Planning, North York District

(1) The following uses are permitted uses subject to:

Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Fort Collins, CO

SHRI GANESHAY NAMAHA

Staff Report for Council Public Meeting

Office Building. Market Value Assessment in Saskatchewan Handbook. Office Building Valuation Guide

Municipality of Brockton Planning Report

York Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan

Ontario Rental Market Study:

El Dorado County Overview of the General Plan and County Code/Zoning Ordinances. A. General Plan

COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM SUPPORTING DEVELOPMENT OF LAND MARKET IN GEORGIA

City of Independence

Review of the Prices of Rents and Owner-occupied Houses in Japan

The Demolition Rate Of Residential Buildings In Iran. Banafsheh Najafi

City Council Study Session Agenda Puyallup City Council Chambers 333 S Meridian, Puyallup Tuesday, February 5, :30 PM

Examples of Quantitative Support Methods from Real World Appraisals

A case study of Ahmedabad, India

A. K. Alexandridis University of Kent. D. Karlis Athens University of Economics and Business. D. Papastamos Eurobank Property Services S.A.

CBDT issues Draft ICDS on real estate transactions: public comments invited by 26 May, 2017

1267 King Street West Zoning Amendment Final Report

Mr Mehta s Conundrum: Where Next?

Press Coverage on WAF India Tour 11 th -12 th April, Ahemdabad

A Report on One Week STTP COORDINATORS. Dr. Yogesh U. Shah, Associate Professor, MEFGI Dr. Siddharth G. Shah, Head FOPG, MEFGI

Residential. Infill / Intensification Development Review

2030 General Plan. December 6, 7 pm

Board of Adjustment Staff Report Meeting Date: June 1, 2017

(b) each living unit shall have a minimum floor area of 27 m 2 (290.6 sq.ft.). (B/L No ) (a) the zoning designations R4, R5, R9, or

RESOLUTION NO ( R)

70 Melbourne Ave Application to amend the (former) City of Toronto Zoning By-law Parkdale Pilot Project Final Report

Gulf Boulevard, Indian Rocks Beach

Foreign Direct Investment in Real Estate in India Policy Insight at a glance

Flinders Avenue, Lara Planning Scheme Amendment Combined Application for Rezoning and Multi-Lot Subdivision Reference : Decembe

BUSINESS PROPERTY THE REAL VALUE OF. New Minnesota law gives appraisers a way to establish minimum compensation in eminent domain cases

Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake Official Plan Review. Discussion Paper: Second Residential Units. Prepared for: The Town of Niagara-on-the-Lake

JOINT VENTURE DEVELOPMENT (JVD)

INDIAN RIVER COUNTY, FLORIDA. The Honorable Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission DEPARTMENT HEAD CONCURRENCE

Land Tenure Issues and Improvement of Urban Low Income Settlements Experiences of Colombo, Sri Lanka

1202 & 1204 Avenue Road Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

CITY OF MEDFORD COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BUILDABLE LAND INVENTORY

Instructions: Script:

13 Sectional Map Amendment

STAFF REPORT. January 25, North York Community Council. Director, Community Planning, North District

This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of medium density, high rise multiple family housing.

Settlement Pattern & Form with service costs analysis Preliminary Report

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF NEW ORLEANS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. City Planning Commission Staff Report. Executive Summary

DAYLIGHT SIMULATION FOR CODE COMPLIANCE: CREATING A DECISION TOOL. Krystle Stewart 1 and Michael Donn 1

Colchester Borough Council - Local Plan Part 2 Viability Study: Summary of Emerging Findings

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

Real Estate Investment Analysis

BY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AN ACT TO BE ENTITLED

O-I (Office-Institutional) and AG-1(Agricultural)

Table of Contents. Appendix...22

Land Use. Existing Land Use

Attachment 4 ANALYSIS I. Current Special Exception Use Standards for Accessory Apartments (Also See Attachment 2 Table for Quick Comparison)

Zoning within Plot An Approach to Land Sub Division to Control Violation of Development Control Rules

Transcription:

Impact of Building Byelaws on Housing: A Comparative Study of Development Control Rules of Jaipur and Pune Abstract Housing is the prime necessity of human beings. Government has made many policies to encourage the housing activity. Building Byelaws affect housing activities very significantly in terms of its utilization and cost. Building Byelaws control the numbers of dwelling units, in some cases, that can be accommodated in a given parcel of land by implementing the essential clauses such as Built Up Area, FSI/FAR, Maximum Building Height, Margins to be kept open in front and around the buildings, etc. The impact of all these clauses varies to the extent of 200 percent in case of Jaipur and Pune city. Attempt has been made in this paper to reveal the impact of Byelaws on housing. Comparative study has been done for Jaipur and Pune cities for five building forms and impact has been revealed. 1. INTRODUCTION Development plan of the city or town attempts to evolve scientific and rational policies to meet the functional needs of the city and aspirations of its citizens. Planning of land use and construction activities require control on it by some regulations, which are General Development Control Regulations, may suitably be renamed as General Development Promotion Regulations. In India, it is the field of legislation pertaining to the state government to frame development control regulations. These regulations affect many parameters of urban development like housing, population density, infrastructure requirement, environment, etc. This impact directly depends upon the development control regulations for the city. In this paper attempt has been made to study the impact of building byelaws on housing by comparing the DCR of Jaipur city and Pune city. To study impact of development control regulations on housing, two cities have been selected as they have comparable population and potential for development, namely Jaipur from Rajasthan and Pune from Maharashtra. This study has been carried out by comparing the DCR of both the cities. The study was limited to residential dwelling units only and for five types of building forms, namely detached bungalows, duplex bungalows, row houses, low rise buildings and high rise buildings type development. Thus, this study is limited to only residential use and five building forms of development type. K. B. Vaghani, is practicing as a engineer (civil), planner and valuer. He pursued his M. Tech. (Planning) in 2009. Email: vertex_303@yahoo.com Dr. Krupesh A. Chauhan, is Associate Professor in Civil Engineering, SVNIT, Surat. He is also Professor in Charge, Landscaping and Road Network at SVNIT, Surat. Email : ncs@ced.svnit.ac.in Dr. N. C. Shah, is Professor in Civil Engineering, SVNIT, Surat. He is Section Head of M. Tech. (Planning). Email: kac@ced.svnit.ac.in 34

Fig. 1 Study Area Location ( Jaipur and Pune ) 2. OVERVIEW OF THE BYELAWS AND HOUSING Government has made policies to provide houses to all. It has encouraged this policy in Five Year Plans and through other policies regarding finance and land use. After 62 years of Independence, still government is not in a position to provide shelter to all. Hence, it is high time to think about the ways by which maximum dwelling units can be provided in the available parcel of land for controlling land cost factor and minimizing conversion of land under agriculture use to nonagriculture use. Otherwise, it will create scarcity of other two prime necessity of human needs i.e. food and cloth. At the same time, quality of life should not be affected anyway. One of the best tools to achieve this goal is to make modifications in development control regulations and building byelaws. In India, building byelaws are framed taking into account the National Building Code as the base and state government acts. However, it is not mandatory for the states to follow the NBC strictly. Each state makes modifications as per their local requirements and traditions. National Building Code has been revised in 2005 but there has been stated nothing about restricting the states by making building byelaws which have adverse affects on housing availability and indirectly affecting land cost and land use conversion. 35

Building byelaws are the tools in hand of policy makers to control the various parameters affecting the quality of life. It is also helpful for implementing authority to control and carry out systematic development as per policies. These byelaws affect the availability of housing. This is due to the impact of DCR on the planning, which controls the numbers of dwelling units that can be accommodated in a given parcel of land. Necessary data for planning are common open plot required to be kept, maximum permissible ground coverage i.e. built up area, FSI/FAR, building height, margins required to be kept open from abutting road as well as on other than roadside and between two buildings within same plot. All these data from the DCR of both the cities are collected and noted as shown in Table 1. Necessary data for planning are common open plot required to be kept, maximum permissible ground coverage i.e. built up area, FSI or FAR, building height, margins required to be kept open from abutting road as well as on other than roadside and between two buildings within same plot. All these data from the DCR of both the cities are collected and noted as shown in Table 1. Table 1 Maximum / Minimum Limits of Various Byelaws of Jaipur City and Pune City Sr. No. Building Built Up Building Margins : Road Margins : Form Area (%) Height (Mt.) Side (Mt.) Other Than Road Side (Mt.) Jaipur Pune Jaipur Pune Jaipur Pune Jaipur Pune i. Detached 45 50 12.0 12.0 7.50 4.50 3.0-9.0/ 3.00 Bungalows -18.0 3.0-10.0 ii. Duplex 45 50 12.0 10.0 4.50 4.50 3.00 3.00 Bungalows - 6.0 iii. Row Houses 60 50 12.0 10.0 4.50 4.50 2.50 2.50 iv. Low Rise 40 25 12.0 16.0 15.00 4.50 6.00 3.00 v. High Rise 35 25 30.0 36.0 15.00 7.50 9.00 7.50 Permissible FSI in Jaipur is 1.2 for Detached Bungalows, Duplex Bungalows and Row Houses, 1.67 for Low Rise and 1.8 for High Rise whereas in Pune, it is 1.0 for all building forms. Common Open Plot : Not required in Jaipur City whereas 10% in Pune City. Margin between two adjacent buildings within same building unit : Jaipur City : Not Specified Pune City : (H/2 3.0) X 2 for both Low Rise as well as High Rise, where, H is Height of Taller Building. Source : Jaipur Development Authority ( Jaipur Region Building ) Rules 2000 and DCR 1982, Pune. 36

Fig.2 Layout Plan for High Rise Building as per DCR of Jaipur and Pune City. High Rise Building as per DCR of Jaipur City High Rise Building as per DCR of Pune City The layout plans are prepared in a hypothetical plot of an extent of one hectare i.e. 100 m X 100 m for all five building forms. Layout plans for high rise buildings are shown in Fig. 2 consuming full permissible FSI available as per building byelaws in force for both the cities. Number of dwelling units that can be accommodated in layout for each building form by applying the byelaws of both the cities separately have been obtained. It is noted as shown in Table 2. Main affects of byelaws are maximum permissible ground coverage i.e. built up area, maximum permissible FSI or FAR, maximum permissible height of the building, the width of the road on which the building unit i.e. plot abutting, minimum margins to be kept open on all sides of the building, etc. All these byelaws ultimately used for controlling the population density and to create comfortable environment for achieving best possible quality of life. It also takes care of the safety of occupants. In DCR of Pune city, one more parameter is used to control the population density, 37

Table 2 Numbers of Similar Size Dwelling Units as per DCR of Jaipur and Pune. Sr. No. Building Permissible Total Consumed Total Nos. of Dwelling Ratio : Pune Form Built Up Area (FSI) Built Up Area (FSI) Units (%) Jaipur v/s. Jaipur Pune Jaipur Pune Jaipur Pune i. Detached 9,638.40 6,879.60 8,836.80 4,844.70 16 21 76.19 Bungalows ii. Duplex 9,408.00 5,818.00 6,986.88 3,480.00 32 40 80.00 Bungalows iii. Row Houses 8,409.60 5,466.00 8,395.20 5,362.80 48 60 80.00 iv. Low Rise 16,700.00 9,000.00 12,416.00 8,640.00 128 80 160.00 v. High Rise 18,000.00 9,000.00 17,760.00 8,640.00 160 80 200.00 is tenement density i.e. permissible numbers of tenements per hectare of land. This rule controls the numbers of dwelling units that can be permitted in a given parcel of land. It also controls the size of dwelling unit indirectly. In DCR of Jaipur City, required size of plot for various building form varies from 45 sq m for row housing to 1,000 sq m for high rise buildings. Similarly, Fig. 3 Impact of DCR on Housing permissible built up area, FSI, margins, maximum permissible building height and requirement of width of road on which plot shall abut gets changed. Thus, when the building form is changed, and the entire requirement is changed. For Jaipur City, only one byelaw remains same for all building forms under consideration, which is requirement of COP not required to be provided. Ground coverage varies from 35 percent for high rise buildings to 60 percent for row houses. Height varies from 12 m for detached bungalows, duplex bungalows, row houses and low rise buildings to 30 m for high rise buildings. Minimum width of road on which plot shall be abutting for high rise buildings is 24 m in Jaipur city for getting full height of 30 m whereas it is only 9 m in Pune city. In Pune city DCR, required size of Plot for various building forms varies from 50 sq m. for Row House to 1,000 sq m. for high rise buildings. Byelaws remain same for all building forms considered in study are requirement of COP and permissible FSI, which are 10 percent of plot area and 1 respectively. 38

Ground Coverage is 50 percent for detached bungalow, duplex bungalow and row houses whereas for low rise buildings and high rise buildings, it is 25 percent. Maximum permissible height varies from 10 m for row houses to 36 m for high rise buildings. Requirement for margins is correlated with extent of plot and width of road on which the plot abuts for all type of building forms. Distance between two buildings on a single plot is {(½ H 3) x 2} meter for both low rise buildings as well as for high rise buildings. 3. MAJOR FINDINGS From the study, it is found that by applying the DCR of Jaipur city and Pune city, there is not much impact of DCR on detached bungalows, duplex bungalows and row houses type development. By applying DCR of Pune city, 31.25 percent more dwelling units can be accommodated in case of detached bungalows type development and 25 percent in case of duplex bungalows and row houses type development than by applying DCR of Jaipur city. In case of low rise buildings and high rise buildings, by applying DCR of Jaipur city, 128 and 160 dwelling units can be accommodated respectively instead of 80 dwelling units for both type of development in the same parcel of land in Pune city i.e. 60 percent and 100 percent respectively more as shown in Fig. 2. Hence, the DCR of Jaipur city allows 1.60 times the dwelling units in low rise buildings and 2 times in high rise buildings than that in Pune city. Thus, DCR affect availability of numbers of housing units that can be accommodated in a available parcel of land. The development can be categorized in four categories considering different philosophy: High Rise with High Density; High Rise with Low Density; Low Rise with High Density; and Low Rise with Low Density. The study supports the first notion that high rise with high density particularly for high land cost with sound infrastructure available. 4. CONCLUSIONS The impact of building byelaws is significant on housing as parcels of land are sold on available FSI on that parcel of land. DCR of Pune city are favorable in case of detached bungalows, duplex bungalows and row houses as more numbers of dwelling units can be accommodated in Pune than Jaipur by applying its own DCR. Its effect is up to 31.25 percent for detached bungalows and 25 percent in case of duplex bungalows and row houses type development. Effect of DCR is tremendous in case of low rise buildings and high rise buildings, which is up to 60 percent in low rise 39

building and 100 percent in high rise building type development due to wide difference in available FSI. It means 60 percent and 100 percent more dwelling units can be accommodated in Jaipur city than that in Pune by applying its own DCR respectively. DCR of Jaipur city is favorable for these two building forms. DCR of Jaipur city for low rise buildings and high rise buildings are favorable for housing compared to DCR for Pune city. DCR shall be made such that maximum number of dwelling units can be accommodated in the available parcel of land to optimize the use of land without affecting adversely the quality of urban life. REFERENCES Vaghani, K.B., Chauhan, K.A. and Shah, N.C. (2009) General Development Promotion Regulations: A Comparative Study of Different Cities of Western India, CED, SVNIT, Surat. Bureau of Indian Standards (1976) The National Building Code of India -2005, Bureau of Indian Standards, Government of India, New Delhi. Dave, N.T. (2007) A Study of Revised Development Plan 2004 of Surat, with Special Reference to Planning Parameters, CED, SVNIT, Surat. Government of Gujarat (1976) Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act 1976, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar. Government of Gujarat. Revised Development Plan with Development Control Rules, Surat Urban Development Authority, Surat. Government of Maharashtra. Development Control Regulations for Pune Municipal Corporation, Pune. Patel P.S. Impact of Building Byelaws and Zoning Regulations in Urban Development: A Case Study of Ashram Road and Arvind Road, CEPT, Ahmedabad. Ramkrishna, S.R. Development Control Regulations: A Tool for Intense and Utilization: Case Study of Chennai City, CEPT, Ahmedabad. ITPI PUBLICATIONS Reader Volumes (Rs. 100/- each) Advanced Transportation Planning City and Metropolitan Planning and Design Development Management Ecology and Resource Development Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental Planning and Design History of Human Settlements Housing Land Economics Network and Services Planning Legislation and Professional Practice Planning Techniques Planning Theory Project Formulation and Appraisal Regional Planning and Development (Part -I) Social Formation and Changes Statistics and Population Studies Transportation Planning Village Planning and Rural Development 40