MULTIFAMILY PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE RESEARCH. City of Phoenix Water Services Department

Similar documents
Water Use in the Multi family Housing Sector. Jack C. Kiefer, Ph.D. Lisa R. Krentz

2.2 Future Demand Projection Methodology

Return on Investment Model

Relationship Between Building Permits, Housing Starts, and Housing Completions

METROPOLITAN NORTH GEORGIA WATER PLANNING DISTRICT CONSERVATION PRICING GUIDANCE JANUARY 2014

Employing a GIS-based Approach to Developing. Student Generation Rates

2018 Assessment Roll Edit Guide for Parcel-Level Geographical Information System (GIS) Information

Residential Building Stock Assessment (RBSA)for Multi-Family Housing

Customer Classifications and Allocation Policies

ANALYSIS OF WATER USE PATTERNS IN MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENCES FINAL REPORT

South Park County Sanitation District

Advancing Methodology on Measuring Asset Ownership from a Gender Perspective

MULTIFAMILY PROPERTY MANAGERS

A Brief Overview of H-GAC s Regional Growth Forecast Methodology

New Models for Property Data Verification and Valuation

Future Land Use Allocation Model (FLUAM) Methodology

Town of North Topsail Beach

Presented by: Stewart Information International, Inc. Jack McKenna

SQUAW VALLEY PUBLIC SERVICE DISTRICT

October 1, 2011 thru December 31, 2011 Performance Report

Asset valuation. Advancing Methodology on Measuring Asset Ownership from a Gender Perspective

Updated - A Report on the County of Arlington s Existing and Possible Urban Tree Canopy

July 1, 2018 thru September 30, 2018 Performance Report

MAJESTIC PALMS 1920 N 32ND ST PHOENIX, AZ Danny Lee Vice President Investment Advisor

2019 DC Study External Stakeholder Committee Minutes

2458 E Ivy St, Mesa, AZ 85213

HOLLEY NAVARRE WATER SYSTEM, INC. IMPACT FEE POLICIES, PROCEDURES & CALCULATIONS

Assessing Affordable Housing Need A Practical Toolkit. Jenni Easton, AICP Nick Fedorek

Rental Housing Finance Survey* *and a few observations about gubment data. Rich Levy US Census Bureau Washington, DC April 2014

RIM Spatial Data. Subhead for title slide

Nonresidential construction activity in the Twin Cities region was robust in 2013

Additional Guidance for Residential Properties

WRF Webcast. Water Use in the Multi-family Housing Sector

Chesapeake Bay Program Indicator Analysis and Methods Document Protected Lands Updated September 2016 (Data current through 2015_16)

The New Technology of a Survey Data Model and Cadastral Fabric as the Foundation for a Future Land Administration System.

STATE UNIVERSITY of NEW YORK PROJECT CAPITALIZATION FORM (PCF) INSTRUCTIONS

CHAPTER 2 VACANT AND REDEVELOPABLE LAND INVENTORY

WATERFIX STRATA PROVIDES SAVINGS FOR CUSTOMERS IN HI-RISE TOWERS

Land Details. Bridging the Gap between Assessor Acres and GIS Acres

5. PROPERTY VALUES. In this section, we focus on the economic impact that AMDimpaired

General Market Analysis and Highest & Best Use. Learning Objectives

Economic Development Action Plan

Using Geographical Information Systems to Enhance Public Finance Analyses

Suite TM SERVICE PROVIDERS. Move Your Business Forward

TROUBLESHOOTING YOUR CAMA DATA WITH GIS

A Review and Perspective on Parcel Data Models for Urban Planning

Water and Wastewater Submetering Addendum SAMPLE

City of Bellingham Urban Growth Area - Land Supply Analysis Summary

Economic Effects of the New Housing Industry in the Sacramento Region

Appendix A2 Methodology for Estimating Employment Capacity in MD NCSGRE Aug 2012 Page 1

Existing Land Use. Typical densities for single-family detached residential development in Cumberland County: 1

DUCHARME PROPERTY REVENUE, BULK DATA & ASSET REGISTER SUPPORT ARE YOUR PROPERTY & REVENUE DATA COMPLETE AND ACCURATE?

Development and Updates of Protected Lands Databases in the US (PAD-US, NCED, CARL)

Trend (span) Last 4-6 Months (3-month period)

RULE 24 - CALCULATION OF WATER USE CAPACITY AND CAPACITY FEES A. RESIDENTIAL CALCULATION OF WATER USE CAPACITY

(340) (866)

Table 4b-1. City of Bremerton Building Permits CITY OF BREMERTON: NEW UNITS Type

Mississauga Residential Multiple Unit Directory

Barry Farm Phase 1 Design Workshop Excel Academy Public Charter School June 20, 2017

Oak Cliff Gateway District PD 468

CoStar Commercial Repeat Sales Indices (CCRSI)

Table of Contents. Appendix...22

GASB 34 Compliance. Retrospective Valuation of ODOT Infrastructure. A Proposed Approach

2005 COTTAGE GROVE BUILDABLE LANDS ANALYSIS UPDATE

The Added Value of Geospatial Information in Disaster and Risk Management: A Case Study on the 2009 Flooding in Namibia

Condominium Conversions in. Determinants

Download Presentation

Is there a conspicuous consumption effect in Bucharest housing market?

FGDC Cadastral Data Subcommittee. December 2008

Course Mass Appraisal Practices and Procedures

GENERAL PROVISIONS

City of Surrey s Digital Plan Submission Process

Annual (2013) Review of the Surrey Official Community Plan

Questions and Answers to the RFP for Professional Property Management Bid

Capturing the Geographic Value of Living in 3-D3. Boulder County Assessor s s Office

BARNSTABLE COUNTY HOME CONSORTIUM UNDERWRITING ANALYSIS OF FUNDING REQUEST

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Proposed Abington Terrace Development Abington Township, Montgomery County

FLOOR AREA REPORT GUIDE

Demonstration Properties for the TAUREAN Residential Valuation System

Parks & Recreation Impact Fee Update

Town of Gilford, New Hampshire

A. K. Alexandridis University of Kent. D. Karlis Athens University of Economics and Business. D. Papastamos Eurobank Property Services S.A.

MISSOULA DOWNTOWN BUILDING & BUSINESS INVENTORY

Installation Boundary Mapping and the DoD Real Property Inventory Program

2012 Multifamily Market Research Energy and Water Survey INSTRUCTIONAL BOOKLET

ENVIRONMENT CANTERBURY S WEB-BASED CONTAMINATED LAND INFORMATION TRANSFER SYSTEM

Gold Beach Buildable Lands Analysis

REAL ESTATE MARKET OVERVIEW 1 st Half of 2015

MonthlyStatistics OCTOBER 2018

MonthlyStatistics AUGUST 2018

Technical Description of the Freddie Mac House Price Index

>The Finishing Touches

Kaua i General Plan Update Technical Study

1519 Tower Grove Ave: Request for Tax Abatement. Site Address: 1519 Tower Grove Avenue. Request: Tax Abatement. Company Name: Pier Property Group

Pecos County Appraisal District. Chief Appraiser: Sam Calderon III

Project Summary Housing Affordability Data for CLF Equity Atlas 2.0

The Newsletter of the Maine Chapter IAAO SPRING Covering Maine Assessing FROM THE EDITOR:

MonthlyStatistics OCTOBER 2017

For Sale - ±3.36 Acre Multi-Family Land $841,000 Zoned R Units Per Acre Camelback East, Phoenix

Attached are most of our responses to the WSA scope questions and a pdf of the attachments referenced in the responses.

Transcription:

MULTIFAMILY PAST, PRESENT AND FUTURE RESEARCH City of Phoenix Water Services Department

Overview 1. Background 2. Research a. Past b. Present c. Future

Multifamily Developments

Multifamily Unit Size 3,000 Recent (Post 1998) City of Phoenix Multifamily Developments By Average Size of Units in Square Feet 2,500 2,000 1,500 Traditional Multifamily Size 1,000 500 0

Multifamily Fixtures 30 Recent (Post 1998) City of Phoenix Multifamily Developments By Average Number of Fixture Units Expected Single Family Count 25 20 Old Expected MF Count 15 10 5 0

Potential Multifamily Subsectors ICI sectors have similar end use characteristics Hospitality (extended stay) Retirement Communities Timeshare Dormitories Correctional Facilities Mixed-use (residential/retail) Brookedale Central Senior Living Extended Stay America

Previous Research 2008 Hazen and Sawyer Demand management plan update Goals: Begin to disaggregate sector Characterize presence and efficiency of end uses quantify curtailment potential Method: mail survey Site level data Water use matched to properties using address and customer characteristics Attempted to match landscape meters to properties 2014 BBC/Keen ICI Phoenix research initiative Goal: Assessing structural changes in demand property characteristics Method: GIS Water use spatially join to parcel Enhanced data with Hazen and Sawyer site level data

BBC/Keen Estimating Indoor Use Indoor Use = 166-169 g/u/d Majority of water use indoor Major indoor uses Toilets, showers, faucets Clothes washers In-unit laundry, common area, no laundry facilities

BBC/Keen Estimating Outdoor Use Outdoor use = 43-46 g/u/d, less than ¼ total use 125 developments (98% had irrigable landscape, 78% at least one pool Lower water use than single family shared common area Not all properties have dedicated irrigation meters Variation of landscape types within and among developments

Developed landscape categories based on City s single family landscape classification Source: BBC/Keen Independent Multifamily Report

Gallons per unit per day BBC/Keen Overall Trends 300 Average water use for sample properties, 2002-2012 250 258 200 212 150 100 50 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year Source: Keen Independent Calculations

Current Research Multifamily Inventory Creating a more expansive multifamily inventory (5+ unit developments) Data Acquisition Multiple sources Maricopa County Database COP water consumption COP water meter shapefile Maricopa County Parcel shapefile Using aerial imagery to identify pools and cooling towers Data Complexity Multiple sources different structures and formats Association between parcels, water meters and multifamily developments

Inventory Creation Data Complexity One to one relationship (meter to parcel/development) similar single family

Inventory Creation Data Complexity Many to one relationship (meter to parcel/development)

Inventory Creation Data Complexity Many to many relationship (meter to parcel)

Current Research Overcoming Data Obstacles Identifying and correcting the locations of incorrectly placed water meters in GIS Layer Applying spatial analysis to more accurately associate multifamily developments with water meters and property characteristics Creating multifamily developments from Maricopa County parcel shapefile Spatial selection of all water meters which fall into multifamily development polygons

Inventory Database 1348 multifamily development polygons (5+ unit complexes) Database includes: Building characteristics Water consumption data Unit counts for each multifamily development Presence of pools (using GIS/assessor data) Presence of cooling towers (using GIS) Total Number Polygons (PUC 035-039) Total Number Parcels Unit Count Water Meter Count Properties (Polygons) 1,348 1,878 115,683 4,319

Number of Apartment Complexes Top-down Data Analysis 400 Multifamily Developments (5+ units) by Build Year 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1910-191920-291930-391940-491950-591960-691970-791980-891990-992000-092010-15 Build Year

Number of Apartment Complexes Top-down Data Analysis Distribution of Multifamily Developments (5+ units) by unit count 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Units

Gallons Per Day/Unit Water Use Trend Comparison Water Use for Multifamily Development (5+ units) 2002-2012 300 250 200 150 City of Phoenix BBC/Keen (sample) 100 50 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year

Future Research Include site specific data for bottom-up analysis Site visits/audits occupancy rates, number of residents, types of fixtures, amenities (pools, laundry, etc.) Datalogging Differentiate fixture types landscape characteristics landscape classification Imagery analysis/coding system Expand inventory for multifamily subsectors Refine water demand forecasts

Landscape Variation of landscape within multifamily developments

Projected End Uses and Average Use

MULTIFAMILY Past, Present and Future Research Jamie Campbell City of Phoenix Water Services Department jamie.campbell@phoenix.gov