Development Program Report for the Alamo Area of Benefit

Similar documents
Development Program Report for the Bethel Island Area of Benefit

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 4 - MAINTENANCE OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY

ORDINANCE WHEREAS, this title is intended to implement and be consistent with the county comprehensive plan; and

RESOLUTION NO. R To Acquire Real Property Interests Required for the Operations and Maintenance Satellite Facility

CHAPTER 4 IMPACT FEES

ADOPT A RESOLUTION REGARDING

SANTA ROSA IMPACT FEE PROGRAM UPDATE FINAL REPORT. May Robert D. Spencer, Urban Economics Strategic Economics Kittelson & Associates

AVENIR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CITY OF PALM BEACH GARDENS SPECIAL BOARD MEETING JANUARY 11, :00 A.M.

Regional Road Capital Improvements Plan and Impact Fee Methodology

MOUNTAIN HOUSE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT To provide responsive service to our growing community that exceeds expectations at a fair value

Cedar Hammock Fire Control District

Exhibit A PROPERTY: LEGAL DESCRIPTION AND MAP. (Included on following pages)

4. Parks and Recreation Fee Facility Needs and Cost Estimates Fee Calculation Nexus Findings 24

RESOLUTION NO. RD:EEH:LCP

ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF PORT ARANSAS, TEXAS, BY ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER

in Book 10019, at Page 9432, 352 feet, more, or less, to the North right of way of 3350 South Street; thence West along said right of way 93 feet,

STAFF REPORT FOR REZONE #R JANUARY 15, 2015 PAGE PC-1 CVH INVESTMENTS LLC 455 E. GOBBI ST UKIAH, CA 95482

CITY OF OAKLEY PARK IMPACT FEE PROGRAM UPDATE NEXUS STUDY

Sec Definitions. [Note: the long list of definitions related to Mobility will appear in the Handbook.]

Kane County. Division of Transportation. Technical Specifications Manual for Road Improvement Impact Fees Under Kane County Ordinance #07-232

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD NO (West Lake Elsinore Public Improvements)

r t h c t y w e s t * THESE PAGES REPLACE THE PAGES HAVING THE SAME PAGE NUMBER AS THOSE IN THE DEVELOPMENT UNIT 4A PLAN TEXT DATED OCTOBER 26, 1987.

WEDNESDAY, JUNE 28, 2017, 9:00 AM

SOUTH DAVIS METRO FIRE AGENCY FIRE IMPACT FEE FACILITIES PLAN (IFFP) AND IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS (IFA)

RECOMMENDATION Following the public hearing, consider Zoning Case PD14-16, with a Development Plan.

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES TRANSPORTATION

DRAFT. Development Impact Fee Model Ordinance. Mount Pleasant, SC. Draft Document. City Explained, Inc. J. R. Wilburn and Associates, Inc.

RESOLUTION NO

Executive Summary Planning Code Text Change HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 2015

City of Banks TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE. Methodology Report. February 2016 FCS GROUP. Prepared by:

Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231A Replacing the Ada County Highway District Impact Fee Ordinance No. 231

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1154

OLD GRANADA VILLAGE MANAGEMENT DISTRICT PLAN

City and County of San Francisco

Development Impact & Capacity Fees

CONTRA COSTA LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICER'S REPORT. May 12, 2010 (Agenda)

Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Mitigation Program Procedural Manual

Guy Kay Director Ward Three AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS REGULAR MEETING

"#$%!&'()*+,'-(-.,)! /(+.-(0!12+()*.,)!

Capital Improvement Plans and Development Impact Fees

Sketch & Legal Description of Mitigation Bank and Ingress/Egress Access Easements

QUARTERPATH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CITY OF WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA SPECIAL ASSESSMENT REPORT. Prepared By: MuniCap, Inc.

REPORT OF SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR THE CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE. CITY OF LAKE ELSINORE CFD (Rosetta Canyon Public Improvements) Fiscal Year

(Res. No R003, ) NON-REGIONAL ROAD CAPITAL EXPANSION FEE [2] Footnotes: --- (2) Findings.

JOBS HOUSING NEXUS ANALYSIS

SPECIAL TAX AND BOND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT

CHICO/CARD AREA PARK FEE NEXUS STUDY

ARTICLE IX. DEVELOPMENT FEES

SYSTEMS OF PROPERTY DESCRIPTION

APPROVED LONG-RANGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PLAN MAJOR APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PROJECT MISSION BAY

Full Freeway Frontage Opportunity

RD17 Area: Interim Urban Level of Flood Protection Levee Impact Fee

Water Investigation Zone No. 2 Fee Analysis Report Fiscal Year

TRUCKEE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT ORDINANCE

Rough Proportionality and the City of Austin. Prepared for the Austin Bar Association 2016 Land Development Seminar (9/30/16)

AGENDA UPDATE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT & FINANCE STANDING COMMITTEE MEETING MONDAY, AUGUST 10, 2015 III. COMMITTEE AGENDA

Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study

This unofficial copy was downloaded on Jul from the City of Fort Collins Public Records Website:

City of Cupertino AB 1600 Mitigation Fee Act Annual & Five Year Report for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2014 & 2015

Order of Business. Board of Supervisors' Agenda Items

SECTION 7000 LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

EXHIBIT A. City of Corpus Christi Annexation Guidelines

Tahoe Truckee Unified School District. Developer Fee Justification Study

POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ADMINISTRATION REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2017/2018 IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.

ATTACHMENT B GRANT DEED. This deed is in satisfaction of the Eminent Domain Action Case No. GRANT DEED

ORDINANCE # AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ALBANY CITY COUNCIL APPROVING UNIVERSITY VILLAGE MIXED USE PROJECT ZONING MAP AMENDMENT

Community Facilities District Report. Jurupa Unified School District Community Facilities District No. 13. September 14, 2015

S A N TA C L A R A VA L L E Y T R A N S P O R TAT I O N A U T H O R I T Y

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR CASITAS MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO (OJAI)

MEMORANDUM. Mr. Sean Tabibian, Esq. Dana A. Sayles, AICP, three6ixty Olivia Joncich, three6ixty. DATE May 26, 2017

CITY of EDMONTON / LEDUC COUNTY ANNEXATION. Framework for Agreement

AGREEMENT TO SETTLE LITIGATION RELATING TO THE DOUGHERTY VALLEY GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT

V.A. EMERYVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. Agenda Date: April 24, 2014 Report Date: April 17, Emeryville Planning Commission

ORDINANCE NO. CID-3087

VILLAGE OF ORLAND PARK

County and related Memorandum of Understanding MOU

E WASHINGTON COUNTY OREGON. Andy Back, Planning and Development Services Manager

Parks and Recreation Development Impact Fee Study

Order of Business. D. Approval of the Statement of Proceedings/Minutes for the meetings of June 21, 2017 and June 28, 2017.

Improvement District (T.I.D.) Document Last Updated in Database: November 14, 2016

Section 150, Impact Fees, Pinellas County Land Development Code

Exhibit A COUNTY OF EL DORADO TRAFFIC IMPACT MITIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATIVE MANUAL. Adopted by Board Resolution on January 24, 2017.

RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 3 (SEABRIDGE AT MANDALAY BAY) OF THE CITY OF OXNARD

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT ENGINEER S REPORT

M EMORANDUM. Attachment 7. Steve Buckley and Margot Ernst, City of Walnut Creek. Darin Smith and Michael Nimon, EPS

COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS & IMPACT FEES FOR DEVELOPMENTS IN VARIOUS CITIES

SECOND AMENDMENT TO JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR EAST CONTRA COSTA REGIONAL FEE AND FINANCING AUTHORITY

CITY OF HIAWATHA, IOWA TOWN VILLAGE CENTER URBAN REVITALIZATION PLAN. for the TOWN VILLAGE CENTER URBAN REVITALIZATION AREA

RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, The City of Santa Clara is the Government entity responsible for providing public

Drainage Impact Fee AB 1600 Nexus Study Update to the Thermalito Master Drainage Plan

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT Country Club Acres Second Amended Subdivision Amendment PLNSUB E Parkway Avenue December 12, 2013

GeoPoint 1403 E. 5th Avenue Tampa, Florida

TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN PARAGON STAR, LLC

Bill 226 (Private) An Act respecting Ville de Shawinigan

DISTRICT. Huntington Beach. FIM 40-40C-3 APN and

OFFICIAL SUMMARY OF AN ORDINANCE TO CONVEY CERTAIN RAMSEY COUNTY PARK AND OPEN SPACE LANDS TO THE CITY OF MAPLEWOOD.

Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study

Sacramento County Water Agency Code Title 5 ZONE 40 - SPECIAL SERVICE AREA A WATER SUPPLY DEVELOPMENT

Orange Water and Sewer Authority Water and Sewer System Development Fee Study

Transcription:

Julia R. Bueren, Director Deputy Directors Brian M. Balbas, Chief Mike Carlson Stephen Kowalewski Carrie Ricci Joe Yee ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON Development Program Report for the Alamo October, 2016 Prepared Pursuant to Section 913 of the County Ordinance Code Prepared by and for: Contra Costa County Public Works Department, Transportation Engineering Division and Department of Conservation and Development, Community Development Division "Accredited by the American Public Works Association" 255 Glacier Drive Martinez, CA 94553-4825 TEL: (925) 313-2000 FAX: (925) 313-2333 www.cccpublicworks.org

Table of Contents Development Program Report CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE... 1 CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND... 2 CHAPTER 3: LOCATION AND BOUNDARY... 3 CHAPTER 4: GENERAL PLAN RELATIONSHIP... 3 CHAPTER 5: PROJECT LIST... 4 CHAPTER 6: DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL... 5 CHAPTER 7: ESTIMATED COST OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS... 6 CHAPTER 8: METHOD OF COST APPORTIONMENT... 7 CHAPTER 9: FEE RATES... 10 CALCULATION OF FEES... 10 RECOMMENDED FEES... 11 CHAPTER 10: PROGRAM FINANCE CONSIDERATIONS... 12 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES... 12 REVIEW OF FEES... 12 COLLECTION OF FEES... 12 INTEREST ON FEES... 13 DEDICATION IN LIEU OF FEE... 13

List of Tables TABLE 1. ALAMO AOB PROJECTS 4 TABLE 2. DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL SUMMARY 5 TABLE 3. DWELLING UNIT EQUIVALENT (DUE) RATES 7 TABLE 4. GROWTH IN DUE'S 8 TABLE 5. FEE CALCULATIONS 10 List of Exhibits EXHIBIT A. AREA OF BENEFIT BOUNDARY LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT B. AREA OF BENEFIT BOUNDARY PLAT MAP EXHIBIT C. ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECT LIST WITH ASSOCIATED COSTS EXHIBIT D. NEXUS STUDY: ALAMO AREA OF BENEFIT

Chapter 1 Introduction and Purpose The Alamo ( Alamo AOB ) was created as a means to collect funds to maintain and improve roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities needed to accommodate travel demand generated by new land development within the town of Alamo. This Development Program Report ( DPR ) contains information and data in support of maintaining the current fee imposed on development projects within the Alamo AOB. The DPR is required by Chapter 913-6 of the County Ordinance Code and is required by the Board of Supervisors Policy on Bridge Crossing and Major Thoroughfare Fees (adopted July 17, 1979), which implements Division 913 of the County Ordinance Code and section 66484 of the State Subdivision Map Act. One of the objectives of the County General Plan is to connect new development directly to the provision of community facilities necessary to serve that development. In other words, development cannot be allowed to occur unless a mechanism is in place to provide the funding for the infrastructure necessary to serve that development. The Alamo AOB Fee is a means of raising revenue to construct road improvements to serve new developments. Requiring that all new development pay a road improvement fee will help ensure that they participate in the cost of improving the road system. Each new development or expansion of an existing development will generate additional traffic. Where the existing road system is inadequate to meet future needs of new development, improvements are required to meet the new demand. The purpose of a development program is to determine improvements ultimately required by future development and to require developers to pay a fee to fund these improvements. Because the Alamo AOB Fee is based on the relative impact on the road system and the costs of the necessary improvements to mitigate this impact, the fee amount is roughly proportional to the development impact. This report discusses the basis of that fee amount. 1 OF 13

Chapter 2 Background On March 15, 1988, the Board of Supervisors ( Board ) passed a resolution forming the Countywide ( Countywide AOB ) to improve the capacity and safety of the arterial road network in the County through the establishment of a traffic mitigation fee ordinance (Resolution 88/122 and Ordinance 88-27). This ordinance applied to unincorporated areas of the County and outlined boundaries of seven areas of benefit, including the Alamo AOB, within the original Countywide AOB. The Alamo AOB was last updated in 1998. In recent years, the area within the Alamo AOB has experienced changes in the area s traffic circulation needs and development potential. Most of the residential development potential has been fulfilled, and many of the original AOB projects have been constructed. The Alamo AOB is about 98 percent built out, based on projections for a 25-year (2015-2040) planning horizon. Yet new development and expansion of existing development continues, which will generate new travel demand across all travel modes. These changes in AOB area and growth potential have prompted an update to the AOB program, resulting in an amended project list and fee schedule. Over the past 29 years, AOB fees have helped pay for improvements to Stone Valley Road, Miranda Avenue, Livorna Road, and Danville Boulevard. 2 OF 13

Chapter 3 Location and Boundary The Alamo AOB boundary location is described in Exhibit A and generally shown in Exhibit B. Chapter 4 General Plan Relationship The Alamo AOB is consistent with the features of the County General Plan and its amendments, and subscribes to the policies of the General Plan elements. The General Plan policies include, but are not limited to, improving the County roadway network to meet existing and future traffic demands. The Alamo AOB Fee will assist in funding the necessary roadway improvements required for future growth as shown in the General Plan. 3 OF 13

Chapter 5 Project List The project list for the Alamo AOB is set forth in Table 1 below. This list contains three projects, mainly related to pedestrian and bicycle safety improvements. The improvements not related to pedestrian and bicyclist safety are focused on capacity improvements at intersections. The improvements proposed on the Alamo AOB project list were identified in a cooperative effort by the Public Works Department and community stakeholders. The proposed improvements will be reviewed periodically to assess the impacts of changing travel patterns, the rate of development, and the accuracy of the estimated project costs. The periodic review of the program will also allow staff to evaluate project priority and the need to increase fees should project costs increase or exceed the rate of inflation. Table 1. Proposed Project List for Alamo AOB Program Alamo AOB Recommended Projects Danville Blvd/Orchard Ct Complete Streets Improvements Pedestrian Safety Improvements at Stone Valley Middle School, Alamo Elementary, and Rancho Romero School 1. Hemme Avenue Sidewalk 2. Miranda Avenue Natural Pathway 3. Livorna Road Sidewalk Improvements Safety Improvements at intersection of Danville Blvd and Hemme Ave 4 OF 13

Chapter 6 Development Potential The Nexus Study: Alamo ( Nexus Study ), dated October 2016, was prepared by DKS Associates in collaboration with Urban Economics for the Public Works Department and is attached as Exhibit D and incorporated herein by reference. The Nexus Study provides the technical basis for establishing the required nexus between the anticipated future development within the Alamo AOB boundary and the need for certain facilities. The projected growth in households, employment, and vehicle-miles traveled within the Alamo AOB is discussed and shown in the Nexus Study. A summary of the potential new residential dwelling units, office, industrial, and commercial/ retail developments (net growth from 2010 to 2040) for the unincorporated portion of AOB is shown in Table 2. Table 2. Development Potential Summary Land Use Category Units Single-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Office Industrial Commercial/Retail 102 dwelling units 0 dwelling units 30,000 sq ft 0 sq ft 0 sq ft 5 OF 13

Chapter 7 Estimated Cost of Road Improvements The estimated costs of the road improvements planned for the Alamo AOB are shown in Exhibit C. The Alamo AOB will only finance the proportional share of the improvements necessitated by the impact on the road system from new development. Detailed cost estimates for the projects included in the road improvement plan are provided in Appendix C of the Nexus Study. The County will assess an administrative fee equal to 2% of the applicable fee. This additional fee will be used to cover staff time for fee collection, accounting, and technical support to the community groups and traffic advisory committees. 6 OF 13

Chapter 8 Method of Fee Apportionment The total estimated cost of the projects included in the Alamo AOB project list is $6,437,000. The cost to accommodate new development within the Alamo AOB is $2,872,000. The expected growth in the Alamo AOB to the year 2040 is 102 dwelling units and 30,000 square feet of office space. To determine a fee rate per unit, first each development type is assigned a dwelling unit equivalent or DUE rate. DUEs compare the trip making characteristics of a land use in relation to a typical single-family residential unit, which is assigned a DUE of 1. Land uses with lower overall traffic impacts than a single family home are assigned values less than 1, and vice versa. The following Table shows the DUE rates for the various land use categories. Table 3 Dwelling Unit Equivalent (DUE) Rates Trip Percent VMT DUE Land Use Category PM Peak Hour Trip Rate per Unit Length (miles) 2 New trips 2 per Unit per Unit Singe Family 1.01 Dwelling 5.0 100 5.050 1.00 Multi-Family 0.62 Unit 5.0 100 3.100 0.61 Retail 4.10 1,000 2.3 76 7.167 1.42 Office 1.40 Square 4.5 92 5.796 1.15 Industrial 0.98 Feet 5.1 92 4.598 0.91 1 ITE Trip Generation 7th Edition 2 ITE Journal, May 1992 Source: DKS Associates, 2014 7 OF 13

Table 4 Growth in DUEs Development Program Report Land Use Category Unit Growth in Units 1 DUE per Unit Growth in DUEs Singe Family Dwelling 102 1.00 102 Multi-Family Unit 0 0.61 0 Retail 1,000 0 1.42 0 Office Square 30 1.15 35 Industrial Feet 0 0.91 0 Total 137 1 See Table 2: Summary of Estimated Development 2010 to 2040 Growth Source: DKS Associates, 2014 The growth in DUEs for each land use and the total growth in DUEs is shown above in Table 4. Because the DUE rates are based on estimates of the average vehicle-miles of travel generated during the PM peak hours for each general land use type, the developments are charged fees in proportion to the amount of traffic impact they are projected to generate. In this way, the fees attributed to each new parcel will be proportional to the estimated benefits they receive through use of the new improvements. The existing facility standard, or transportation infrastructure investment per dwelling unit, is identified in the nexus study as $20,964 per DUE and is calculated by dividing the existing transportation system value ($158,842,800 as calculated in the nexus study in Table 5) by the total number of existing DUEs. The resulting value of $20,964 represents the existing level of investment per parcel in AOB. Table 5 Existing Transportation System Facility Standard Existing Transportation System Value 1 $158,842,800 Existing DUEs 2 7,577 Existing Facility Standard ($ per DUE) $20,964 Source: Urban Economics, 2014. 8 OF 13

Based on the existing facility standard shown in Table 5 and the estimated growth in DUEs, the total obligation of new development within the Alamo AOB is $2,872,000 as shown below in Table 6. Table 6 Obligation From New Development Existing Facility Standard ($ per DUE) 1 $20,964 Growth in DUEs (2010-2040) 2 137 Total Costs To Accommodate Growth (2010-2040) $2,872,000 Source: Urban Economics, 2014. 9 OF 13

Chapter 9 Fee Rates Calculation of Fees The fee calculation is set forth in detail in the Nexus Study. To determine a maximum fee rate for each land use category, the Cost per DUE is multiplied by the DUE per unit. In the residential categories, this results in a fee per dwelling unit. In the nonresidential categories, the fee is listed per square foot. These calculations are summarized in Table 7 below. Table 7. Fee Calculations Nexus-Based Fee Rates for Alamo AOB Cost of Improvements Allocated to AOB Growth in Dwelling Unit Equivalents Cost per DUE $2,872,000 137 $20,964 Land Use Units DUE per Unit Maximum Fee per Unit 1 Single Family Multi-Family Retail Office Industrial Other Dwelling Unit Dwelling Unit Square Foot Square Foot Square Foot Dwelling Unit Equivalent 1.00 0.61 0.00142 0.00115 0.00091 1.00 1 Maximum Fee per Unit = (Cost per DUE) x (DUE per Unit) $20,964 $12,788 $29.77 $24.11 $19.08 $20,964 Source: DKS Associates, 2014 To determine the DUE for a development considered Other, the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) are first estimated using a combination of trip generation data, the default rate for trip length, and percent new trips. 10 OF 13

Recommended Fees The potential maximum fee rates calculated in the Nexus Study and presented in Table 7 above are not the recommended fee rates for the Alamo AOB. These represent a 27% to 71% increase from the current fee schedule, depending on the land use category. It has been determined that maintaining the current fee rates would be best for the Alamo AOB to encourage continued economic growth by holding rates at approximately the current level as identified below in Table 8. Table 8. Fee Schedule to Implement Land Use Category Calculated Nexus Fee Rate Proposed Fee Rate to Implement Single-Family $20,964 / du $12,102 / du Multi-Family $12,788 / du $10,080 / du Commercial $29.77 / sf $11.18 / sf Office $24.11 / sf $11.18 / sf Industrial $19.08 / sf $11.18 / sf Other $20,964 / due $12,102 / due Note: du = dwelling unit; sf = square foot; due = dwelling unit equivalent 11 OF 13

Chapter 10 Program Finance Considerations Other Funding Sources The improvements planned for the Alamo AOB will be only partially funded by Alamo AOB fee revenues. Other sources of funding, such as State or Federal aid, or local sources such as sales tax, gas tax, etc., will be pursued. These other funding sources include, but are not limited to, Regional Measure J Funds, State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) Funds, and Federal Program Funds. The rate at which revenue is generated by the Alamo AOB Fee depends on the rate of new development. This rate of revenue generation affects the timing of construction of the improvement projects because it is dependent upon the total amount of fees collected, less expenditures. Alternate sources of funding would permit construction of AOB projects sooner. Review of Fees Project cost estimates will be reviewed periodically while the Alamo AOB is in effect. On January 1 of each year thereafter, the amount of the fees will be increased or decreased based on the percentage change in the Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index for the San Francisco Bay Area for the 12-month period ending with the October index of the previous calendar year, without further action of the Board of Supervisors. Collection of Fees Fees will be collected when a building permit is issued, in accordance with Section 913-4.204 of Title 9 (Subdivisions) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. Fees collected will be deposited into an interest bearing trust fund established pursuant to Section 913-8.002 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. 12 OF 13

Interest on Fees The interest accrued on the fees collected shall continue to accumulate in the trust account and shall be expended for construction of the improvements, or to reimburse the County for the cost of constructing the improvements, pursuant to Section 913-8.006 of the County Ordinance Code. Dedication in Lieu of Fee A development may be required to construct, or dedicate right-of-way for a portion of the improvements as a condition of approval. In such an event, the developer may be eligible to receive credit for the fee or reimbursement. The eligible credit and/or reimbursement shall be determined in accordance with the County s Traffic Fee Credit and Reimbursement Policy. 13 OF 13

Exhibit A Boundary Legal Description A portion of south central Contra Costa County, California, bounded on the northwest by South Walnut Creek adopted December 6, 1994 by Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors (hereinafter referred to as Board) Resolution 94/604, bounded on the north and southwest by Central County adopted June 13, 1995 by Board Resolution 95/273, and bounded on the east and south by South County adopted August 6, 1996 by Board Resolution 96/344. Beginning on the boundary of Central County at the most eastern corner of South Walnut Creek, being the intersection of the centerline of Crest Avenue with the extended west right of way line of South Main Street; thence from the Point of Beginning along the boundary of Central County in a general easterly direction 48,280 feet, more or less, to the northeast line of PARCEL D of Subdivision 5536 filed March 17, 1981 in Book 250 of Maps at page 8, being an angle point on the boundary of South County ; thence leaving the boundary of Central County and following the boundary of South County Area of Benefit in a general southeasterly direction and then in a general westerly direction, a total of 49,450 feet, more or less, to the boundary of Central County on the east line of Section 24, Township 1 South, Range 2 West, Mount Diablo Meridian; thence leaving the boundary of South County and following the boundary of Central County in a general northwesterly direction 23,270 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Lot B shown on the Record of Survey filed March 13, 1984 in book 74 of Licensed Surveyors Maps at page 12, also being the most southeastern corner of South Walnut Creek ; thence leaving the boundary of Central County and following the boundary of South Walnut Creek Area of Benefit in a general northerly direction and then in a general easterly direction, a total of 6,275 feet, more or less, to the most eastern corner thereof, the Point of Beginning.

Exhibit B Boundary Plat Map

Exhibit Road Improvement Plan C Project List with Associated Costs Allocation of Project Costs to Alamo AOB Program Recommended Project Estimated Total Cost Danville Blvd/Orchard Ct Complete Streets Improvements $3,614,000 Pedestrian Safety Improvements at Stone Valley Middle School, Alamo Elementary, and Rancho Romero School 1. Hemme Avenue Sidewalk $566,000 2. Miranda Avenue Natural Pathway $922,000 3. Livorna Road Sidewalk Improvements $831,000 Safety Improvements at intersection of Danville Blvd and Hemme Ave $504,000 Source: DKS Associates, 2014 Total $6,437,000

Exhibit D Nexus Study Alamo Exhibit D Attached as separate document