Bettencourt Case Studies: Achieving Outstanding Results for Our Clients Across a Broad Spectrum of Business Models BTA Mission Statement Bettencourt Tax Advisors strives to provide our clients with an effective, efficient, and ethical team who will apply proprietary technology, knowledge of the Property Tax Code, and industry experience, in order to develop strategically compelling cases, on our client s behalf. BTA will uncover all options available to our clients, within the compliance of the law, to gain the maximum reduction possible on their tax liabilities. BTA is committed to providing excellent service and outstanding results to our clients.
Case Study: Airport Garage The data the Appraisal District had available when determining the construction type and costs for this garage did not accurately represent the property. The subject property is a 530 stall concrete and steel constructed parking garage with four decks. It had been valued by the appraisal district utilizing a cost analysis instead of income analysis. During the hearings BTA presented the strongest argument first, using anincome analysis. The tenant, a rental car company, had vacated the property over a year ago, and no other tenants had been secured to date. This analysis indicated a value of $3 million. However, the Appraisal District and the Appraisal Review Board chose to stay with the cost analysis to determine the value. We quickly transitioned into presenting the cost analysis we had prepared. In our analysis we had identified that the appraisal district had utilized an incorrect construction type for the garage, which we were able to evidence with our photos. We had prepared our cost analysis utilizing a comparable garage, approximately 30 miles away that was under construction at the time of the hearing. Utilizing the newest construction methods and being comparable in size, the new garage had a construction cost of approximately $3 million. The subject property was assessedat $9.4 millionand built in1992. The Appraisal Review Boardgranted a reduction of the assessed value to $7.3 million, which reflected a total tax savings of approximately $53,000. However, the Appraisal Review Board refused to reduce the value to the supported value due to the significant variance in the numbers. This case is currently a pending lawsuit with an additional potential tax savings of$100,000 to be secured incourt.
Case Study: Business Personal Property Understanding how your county depreciation schedules are applied to different types of equipment and inventory can have a large impact on your bottom line. BTA s experts have experience working with these depreciation schedules and know how to interpret them and reclassify items, as necessary, to correctly report our client s Business Personal Property (BPP). The subject was an Industrial Manufacturer with $3.3 million in Business Personal Property. Their BPP list included a variety of assets such as manufacturing equipment, office equipment, manufactured products for sale, etc. When our BTA representative approached this account, a complete assessment was done of all of the client s BPP. Using the comprehensive inventory of all applicable property, our representative was able to work from the county s depreciation schedule to divide the client s BPP into the appropriate equipment classifications. As a result of the agent s experienced and educated assessment of this client s property, BTA was able to reduce the BPP valuation from $3.3 million to $2.4 million. The end result was an approximate reduction of the depreciated assets by $900,000, or 27%, for a tax savings of $20,000.
Case Study: Hotel/Motel A thorough assessment of all aspects of a client s property is always the first step in preparing a case to protest the County Appraisal District s valuation of the property. In this case the evidence showed that the recession had affected the Income and Expenses the client realized on the appraised property. These changes indicated a variance was necessary in the valuation; the existing tax appraisaldidnot reflect thecurrent market. The subject was a 67 room hotel constructed in 2003. When Bettencourt Tax Advisors was hired to represent the owner of this property, an assessment was done to determine the best approach to take. After doing an analysis of comparables, costs, and income streams, we determined the best approach to be income stream. As a result of our initial site visit and in depth study of the property s income and expenses; BTA was successful in working with the County Appraisal District to reduce the property valuation for this building. The county agreed to an adjustment based on income, lowering the appraised amount from $3.3 million to $2.1 million. This was an approximate reduction of $1,200,000 or 37.5% in property values, saving the customer $ 31,200 in taxes.
Case Study: Industrial A thorough assessment of all aspects of a property is always the first step in preparing a case to protest your property tax appraisal. During the lifetime of a property, there are often building modifications done to accommodate new owners. These modifications can lead to a variance in valuation that is not always reflected in the existingtax appraisal. The subject was a 44,000 square foot building constructed in 1992. The property had changed ownership since being built and modifications were made. When Bettencourt Tax Advisors first approached the property, a thorough assessment was done of the property s condition, updates, comparables, etc. As a result of our initial site visit and in depth study of the property and comparables, BTA was successful in working with the County Appraisal District to reduce the property valuation for this building. The county agreed to an adjustment based on building design and construction, lowering the appraised amount from $3.6 million to $2.6 million. This was a reduction of $1 million or 27.8% in property values, saving the customer $23,500 in taxes.
Case Study: Multi-Family Cumulative valuations on this property owner s various multi-family locations were increased by an excessive amount for the calendar year in question. Existing market conditions did not warrant the size of theincrease. By following our standard procedures during the preliminary study phase we were able to accumulate the appropriate information to build a winning case for the customer. The total value of the properties involved was $64 million. Based on our initial site visit, as well as, an in depth study of current rent and vacancy rates in the area compared to the subject properties our analysis determined the strongest argument to be the income approach. Using the evidence of photographs of the properties as well as rent roll reflecting the properties tenant occupancy, we successfully proved their overvaluation; reducing the market value from $64 million to $46 million. This was an approximate reduction of $18 million dollars, or approximately 28% in the properties appraised value, saving the customer $450,000 in property taxes.
Case Study: Office Building 1 Although the property had been previously represented by a reputable property tax firm for years, we made no assumptions and did a thorough analysis; every detail was verified. In this case evidence showed that the square footage of the property was listed incorrectly by the appraisal district for the past 31 years. When Bettencourt Tax Advisors first approached the property, a thorough assessment was done of the property s location, classification, comparables, square footage, income stream, etc. As a result of our initial site visit and in depth study of the property and comparables, BTA was successful in working with the County Appraisal District to reduce the property valuation for this building. BTA s analysis indicated that there were three approaches that could successfully be used to gain a reduction in the appraised property value. First, the square footage shown on the building s blue prints were 10,000 less than was stated in the county records. Second, we found that the building s amenities qualified it for a Class B rating not the Class A rating it was being assessed at. Finally, an Income Analysis reflecting current economic conditions greatly contributed to the client s case for a reduction. All three approaches were used successfully to reduce the appraised amount from $4.6 million to $2.9 million. This was an approximate reduction of $1.7 million or 37% in property values, saving the customer $41,500 in taxes.
Case Study: Office Building 2 This property was still under construction as of January 1 st. The percentage of completion had been significantly overstated. An aggressive review of AIA documents and intimate site knowledge resulted in significant tax savings. The subject property is an office building and parking deck that had been under construction and was only 70% complete on January 1 st. When the initial valuation was conducted by the district, they estimated 90% completion, which indicated a significantly higher value than the actual costs in place as of January 1 st. Additionally, the AIA documents reflected many items such as plumbing, a/c components, etc. which had not been installed on the site as of the valuation. Our argument utilized a review of the AIA documents with a fine toothed comb, as well as, a comprehensive site inspection, to determine true hard costs in-place as of January 1 st. Our aggressive cost analysis reflected a value of $17,000,000 which we presented along with an affidavit from the property owner to evidence the items listed on the AIA that were not in place as of January 1 st. The appraisal district accepted our analysis. However, they applied 15% for entrepreneurial profit, pushing the indicated and final value to $20,900,000. This resulted in $6,000,000 reduction and a tax savings of approximately $144,021. This was a reduction of 22% in the assessed value.
Case Study: Restaurant A thorough assessment of all aspects of a client s property is always the first step in preparing a case to protest the County Appraisal District s valuation of said property. In this case the evidence showed that comparable properties had been overlooked when the client s property was appraised. These oversights indicated a variance was necessary in the valuation; the existing tax appraisal did not reflect the current market. The subject was a 10,700 square foot restaurant constructed in 2005. When Bettencourt Tax Advisors first approached the property, an assessment of the property was done to determine the best approach to take. After doing an analysis of comparables, costs, and income streams, we determined the best approach to be comparables. As a result of our initial site visit and in depth study of the property and comparables; BTA was successful in working with the County Appraisal District to reduce the property valuation for this building. The county agreed to an adjustment based on comparables, lowering the appraised amount from $2.5 million to $2.1 million. This was anapproximate reduction of $400,000 or 16% in property values, saving the customer $13,000 in taxes
Case Study: Shopping Center The Appraisal District s classification of the property s grade was based on incorrect information. Bettencourt Tax Advisors scrutinizes every component of an appraisal district s analysis to find the most compelling argument to use in the client s appeals. The subject was a 93,000 square foot Power center constructed in 2001, and classified by the appraisal district as a Class A grade property. The appraisal district had assessed the property based in an Income Analysis. However, we had determined it was a Class B property based on our initial site visit, as well as, an in depth study of current rent, vacancy rates, and tenant mix in the area as compared to the subject property. Our analysis determined the strongest argument to be the income approach. We were successful in proving the classification discrepancy with our evidence of photos of the property as well as the rent roll reflecting the tenants of the property. With that we were able to utilize a more favorable cap rate and stabilization rate; therefore, achieving a 10% reduction from $13,000,000 down to $11,700,000. This reflected a reduction in value of $1,360,000 and a tax savings of approximately$37,700.
Case Study: Warehouse A thorough assessment of all aspects of a client s property is always the first step in preparing a case to protest the County Appraisal District s valuation of said property. In this case the evidence showed that relevant issues had been overlooked when the client s property was appraised. These oversights indicated a variance was necessary in the valuation; the existing tax appraisal didnot reflect current conditions. The subject was a 58,000 square foot warehouse constructed in 1946. When Bettencourt Tax Advisors first approached the property, a thorough assessment was done of the property s location, construction, condition, updates, comparables, etc. As a result of our initial site visit and in depth study of the property and comparables, BTA was successful in working with the County Appraisal District to reduce the property valuation for this building. The county agreed to an adjustment based on the building frontage and construction, lowering the appraised amount from $1.9 million to $1.6 million. This was an approximate reduction of $300,000 or 16% in property values, saving the customer $7,000 in taxes.