SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT November 20, 2015

Similar documents
ATTACHMENT A: FINDINGS

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT February 15, 2013

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT April 18, 2014

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT January 11, 2008

Project Location 1806 & 1812 San Marcos Pass Road

1.0 REQUEST. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Coastal Zone Staff Report for Vincent New Single-Family Dwelling & Septic System

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT August 30, 2007

MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for the Montgomery Lot Line Adjustment

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM. Santa Barbara County Planning Commission

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526

ATTACHMENT B: CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. Overholtzer Tentative Parcel Map Case No. 08TPM /TPM 14,744 Date: October 13, 2010

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report For Magali Farms/Sulpizio Tentative Parcel Map/Development Plan/ Conditional Use Permit

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Flood Control Easement Quitclaim

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Staff Report for Coleman SFD Addition Coastal Development Permit with Hearing

CITY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 300 Richards Blvd, 3rd Floor, Sacramento, CA 95811

1708 Martin Luther King Jr. Way

SISKIYOU COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT March 21, 2018

1. Adopted the required findings for the project specified in Attachment A of the staff report dated February 6, 2004, including CEQA findings;

TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TIME EXTENSION

RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP December 13, 2016

MONTEREY COUNTY STANDARD SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE

City of Placerville Planning Commission STAFF REPORT

RESOLUTION NO xx

CITY OF SANTA CLARITA PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. SUBJECT: Master Case No ; Tentative Parcel Map No

812 Page Street. Item 10 June 21, Staff Report

APPLICATION PROCESSING. CHECK WITH STAFF - Development Services Staff will explain the requirements and procedures to you.

CHAPTER 3 PERMITS, PLANS AND ANNEXATION

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Klink Lot Line Adjustment and Modification

APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR Tentative Parcel or Subdivision Maps

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

820 BEL MARIN KEYS BOULEVARD, NOVATO ASSESSOR'S PARCEL * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM. Planning Commission. Alice McCurdy, Deputy Director Development Review Division

ARTICLE V AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AND RURAL RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT

Diamond Falls Subdivision PROPOSED YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

CITY OF SANTA ANA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AGENDA JANUARY 16, :30 A.M.

APPLICATION PROCESSING

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

FEE The staff will let you know the current cost of filing an application. Make checks payable to the San Joaquin County Treasurer.

Central Lathrop Specific Plan

Planning Commission Staff Report August 6, 2015

TENTATIVE MAP INFORMATION SHEET


Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe

APPLICATION PROCESSING STEPS STEP 1 CHECK WITH STAFF

Residential Project Convenience Facilities

The City of Carlsbad Planning Division A REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Item No. P.C. AGENDA OF: March 16, 2011 Project Planner: Shannon Werneke

MONTECITO PLANNING COMMISSION Coastal Zone Staff Report for Klein Appeal of the Hughes Addition and Remodel Coastal Development Permit

PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALBANY, COUNTY

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Bosshardt Appeal of Planning and Development Denial of Land Use Permit 06LUP

DOUGLAS COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION Section 4 LRR - Large Rural Residential District 3/10/99. -Section Contents-

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Ranch Monte Alegre Lot Line Adjustment

FORM Seven (7) copies of the completed application information forms (attached) which all owners must sign.

292 West Beamer Street Woodland, CA (530) FAX (530)

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING. Recommendation Report. Central Area Planning Commission. Case No.: CEQA No.: Incidental Cases: Related Cases:

MINUTE ORDER BONNER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES AUGUST 6, 2015

PENINSULA TOWNSHIP LAND DIVISION ORDINANCE TOWNSHIP OF PENINSULA COUNTY OF GRAND TRAVERSE, STATE OF MICHIGAN ORDINANCE NO OF 2012

MINOR SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF EL DORADO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TENTATIVE MAP

Agricultural Preserve Cancellation

EL DORADO COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA Napa (707)

A Guide to the Municipal Planning Process in Saskatchewan

EL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. PT14-047


FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Date Submitted Received By Fees Paid $ Receipt No. Received By Application No. Application Complete Final Action Date

ARTICLE 7: PLOT PLANS AND SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS AND REVIEW

ARTICLE 15 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

BONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FOR June 7, 2018

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

FINAL DRAFT 10/23/06 ARTICLE VI

GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS (Exhibit A): MDR (Medium Density Residential) Designation. SURROUNDING: MDR (Medium Density Residential) Designation

Processing Procedures for Subdivisions of Land under a Williamson Act Contract

APPLICATION CHECKLIST

1. The reason provided for the opposing votes was that the two commissioners wanted something else to be developed on their parcel.

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

APPLICATION FOR PERMIT: (Pursuant to Ord & Reso ) 4d Habitat Loss Permit Vegetation Removal Tree Removal. Address:

CHAPTER XVIII SITE PLAN REVIEW

Santa Ynez Valley Community Plan. Planning Commission Solvang Veteran s Memorial Hall May 13, 2009

CHAPTER 7 PROVISIONS GOVERNING USE DISTRICTS

FINAL DRAFT 12/1/16, Rev. to 7/18/17

BONNER COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISION STAFF REPORT APRIL 19, 2018

March 26, Sutter County Planning Commission

YELLOWSTONE COUNTY BOARD OF PLANNING FINDINGS OF FACT

RESIDENTIAL AND RECREATIONAL

LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION GUIDE (BCC , ET SEQ.)

FROM: Kevin Canning, Contract Planner ) OC Development Services/Planning

Kitsap County Department of Community Development. Notice of Administrative Decision

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: NOVEMEBER 22, 2016

Butte County Board of Supervisors

Parcel Map Review Committee Staff Report

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of January 11, Agenda Item 6C. Zone X (Minimal Flood Hazard Area)

STAFF REPORT FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT CDP# STANDARD PERMIT June 11, 2013 CPA-1. Victor Suarez Fern Drive Mendocino, CA 95460

RESOLUTION NO. P15-07

Transcription:

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT November 20, 2015 PROJECT: Acquistapace Tentative Parcel Map HEARING DATE: December 7, 2015 STAFF/PHONE: Dana Eady, (805) 934-6266 GENERAL INFORMATION Case No. 15TPM-00000-00005 / TPM 14,817 Project Site Assessor s Parcel Number: 117-170-063 Applicant: James Acquistapace 1635 N. Blosser Road Santa Maria, CA 93455 Agent/Phone: Dave Cross Fletcher-Cross & Associates 801 S. Broadway, Suite 1 Santa Maria, CA 93454 (805) 928-6463 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The application requests the approval of a Tentative Parcel Map in compliance with County Code Chapter 21 to subdivide a 73.98 gross/net acre parcel into two parcels of 14.8 gross/net acres (proposed parcel 1), and 59.0 acres (proposed parcel 2). The existing parcel would be subdivided along the existing zoning lines so that proposed parcel 1 would be zoned C-S, and proposed parcel 2 would be zoned AG-II-40. The existing parcel is developed with approximately 5,081 sq. ft. of existing development consisting of agricultural storage structures and a single family dwelling. Following approval of the subject Tentative Parcel Map application, these structures would be located entirely within the C-S zone district on proposed parcel 1. Since these structures were constructed prior to 1958 when the zoning ordinance went into effect, these structures are considered to be legal non-conforming and can remain on the parcel. Access to proposed parcel 1 would continue to be provided by an existing private driveway from Main Street / Highway 166. Access to proposed parcel 2 would be provided from Main Street / Highway 166 by a 28 wide private easement for ingress and egress for the benefit of parcel 2 over parcel 1. Caltrans district 5 has reviewed and approved the proposed access. The applicant has indicated that following approval of the subject Tentative Parcel Map application, they plan to apply to place proposed parcel 2 under a Williamson Act contract.

Acquistapace Tentative Parcel Map / Case No. 15TPM-00000-00005 / TPM 14,817 Hearing Date: December 7, 2015 Page # 2 2.0 REQUEST Hearing on the request of Dave Cross of Fletcher-Cross & Associates, agent for the Acquistapace 2004 Family Trust, owner, to consider Case No. 15TPM-00000-00005/TPM 14,817, [application filed on September 4, 2015] for the approval of a Tentative Parcel Map in compliance with County Code Chapter 21 to subdivide a 73.98 gross/net acre parcel into two parcels of 14.8 gross/net acres (proposed parcel 1), and 59.0 acres (proposed parcel 2), on property zoned C-S and AG-II-40; and to determine that the project is exempt pursuant to Section 15305 of the State Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. The application involves AP No. 117-170-063, located approximately 2,000 feet west of the intersection of Blosser Road and Main Street/Highway 166, in the Santa Maria area, Fifth Supervisorial District. 3.0 RECOMMENDATION Follow the procedures outlined below and conditionally approve case number 15TPM-00000-00005/TPM 14,817 marked Officially Accepted, County of Santa Barbara, December 7, 2015, Zoning Administrator Attachments A-D, based upon the project s consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and the ability to make the required findings. The Zoning Administrator s action should include the following: 1. Make the required findings for approval of the project, Case No. 15TPM-00000-00005/TPM 14,817, specified in Attachment A of this staff report, including CEQA findings. 2. Determine the project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15305 of CEQA, as specified in Attachment C; and 3. Approve the project, Case No. 15TPM-00000-00005/TPM 14,817, subject to the conditions included as Attachment B. 4.0 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS 4.1 Site Information Site Size: 73.98 acres (gross/net) Comprehensive Plan Designation: Service Commercial, A-II, A-II-40 Ordinance/Zoning: LUDC, C-S (Service Commercial); AG-II-40 (Agriculture) Surrounding Use, Zoning: North: Agriculture (row crops), AG-II-40 South: Agriculture (row crops), C-S East: Agriculture (row crops) AG-II-40; City of Santa Maria West: Agriculture (row crops) AG-II-40 Services/Systems: Water: Existing private onsite water well; City of Santa Maria Sewer: City of Santa Maria Fire: Santa Barbara County Fire Station #32 Existing private driveway off Main Street/Hwy 166 County Sheriff Access: Police:

Acquistapace Tentative Parcel Map / Case No. 15TPM-00000-00005 / TPM 14,817 Hearing Date: December 7, 2015 Page # 3 Present Use and Development: Existing development onsite consists of: 1) 420 sq. ft. agricultural storage shed; 2) 1,296 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn; 3) 476 sq. ft. agricultural storage shed; 4) 225 sq. ft. storage shed; 5) 180 sq. ft. storage shed; 6) 540 sq. ft. detached garage; 7) 144 sq. ft. storage shed; and 8) 1,800 sq. ft. single family residence. The parcel is also utilized for agricultural purposes (row crops). 4.2 Project Description Request of Dave Cross of Fletcher-Cross & Associates, agent for Acquistapace Family Trust, owner, to consider Case No. 15TPM-00000-00005 / TPM 14,817 [application filed on September 4, 2015] for approval under County Code Chapter 21 to subdivide a 73.98 gross/net acre parcel into two parcels of 14.8 gross/net acres (proposed parcel 1); and 59.0 gross/net acres (proposed parcel 2). The parcel would be subdivided along the existing zoning lines so that proposed parcel 1 would be zoned C-S, and proposed parcel 2 would be zoned AG- II-40. The subject 73.98 gross/net acre parcel contains the following existing development: 1) 420 sq. ft. agricultural storage shed; 2) 1,296 sq. ft. agricultural storage barn; 3) 476 sq. ft. agricultural storage shed; 4) 225 sq. ft. storage shed; 5) 180 sq. ft. storage shed; 6) 540 sq. ft. detached garage; 7) 144 sq. ft. storage shed; and 8) 1,800 sq. ft. single family residence. According to the Santa Barbara County Assessor s Office, the single family residence and detached garage were constructed in 1920, and the remaining structures were constructed in 1911. Since these structures were constructed prior to 1958 when the zoning ordinance went into effect, these structures are considered to be legal non-conforming and can remain on the parcel. Water and sanitary services for proposed parcel 1 would continue to be provided by an existing onsite water well, and the City of Santa Maria. Water services for proposed parcel 2 would be provided by an existing onsite private water well. Future development on this parcel would be served by a private septic system built in conformance with Environmental Health Services requirements. Access to proposed parcel 1 would continue to be provided by an existing private driveway from Main Street / Highway 166. Access to proposed parcel 2 would be provided from Main Street / Highway 166 by a 28 wide private easement for ingress and egress for the benefit of parcel 2 over parcel 1. 5.0 PROJECT ANALYSIS 5.1 Environmental Review The proposed project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15305 [Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations] of the Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Class 5 consists of minor alterations in land use limitations in areas with an average slope of less than 20%, which do not result in any changes in land use or density. With the application of standard County requirements, the project would not create a significant effect on the environment. Additional information is provided in the Notice of Exemption (Attachment C) to this staff report. 5.2 Comprehensive Plan Consistency The proposed project is consistent with all applicable policies contained within the County s Comprehensive Plan.

Acquistapace Tentative Parcel Map / Case No. 15TPM-00000-00005 / TPM 14,817 Hearing Date: December 7, 2015 Page # 4 5.3 Land Use and Development Code Compliance The proposed project site is zoned C-S (Service Commercial), and AG-II-40 (Agriculture), under the County Land Use and Development Code. The proposed project would be consistent with both the C-S and AG-II- 40 zone district standards. The newly created lot could be developed consistent with the requirements of the AG-II-40 zone district. The proposed project is also consistent with the requirements of the County s subdivision regulations as described in the findings (Attachment A). The proposed lots would conform to the configuration requirements as outlined in the Land Use and Development Code, and Chapter 21, and therefore would comply with the minimum requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. 5.4 Subdivision/Development Review Committee (SDRC) The proposed project was reviewed by SDRC on September 17, 2015. Departmental conditions letters were issued by Public Works Transportation, Community Services Parks Division, and the Santa Barbara County Fire Department. No other County Departments have conditions for the proposed project. 6.0 APPEALS PROCEDURE The action of the Zoning Administrator may be appealed to the Planning Commission within the 10 calendar days following the date of the Zoning Administrator's decision by the applicant or an aggrieved person. The appeal fee to the Planning Commission is $608.26. 7.0 ATTACHMENTS A. Findings B. Conditions of Approval C. CEQA Exemption D. Proposed Tentative Parcel Map 14,817

ATTACHMENT A: FINDINGS 1.0 CEQA FINDINGS 1.1 CEQA EXEMPTION The Zoning Administrator finds that the proposed project is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15305. Please see Attachment C, Notice of Exemption. 1.2 LOCATION OF DOCUMENTS The documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which this decision is based are in the custody of the Secretary of the Zoning Administrator located at 123 East Anapamu Street, Santa Barbara, CA 93101. 2.0 ADMINISTRATIVE FINDINGS A. Findings for all Tentative Maps. In compliance with the Subdivision Map Act, the review authority shall make the following findings for the Acquistapace Tentative Parcel Map, Case No. 15TPM- 00000-00005/TPM 14,817: 2.1 State Government Code 66473.1. The design of the subdivision for which a tentative map is required pursuant to 66426 shall provide, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision. Parcel 1 is currently developed with approximately 5,081 sq. ft. of existing development. Parcel 2 is undeveloped. There is sufficient northern, southern, eastern, and western exposure to allow for passive heating or cooling systems to be provided on the site. 2.2. State Government Code 66473.5. No local agency shall approve a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, unless the legislative body finds that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement is consistent with the general plan required by Article 5 (commencing with 65300) of Chapter 3 of Division 1 or any specific plan adopted pursuant to Article 8 (commencing with 65450) of Chapter 3 of Division 1. The project is consistent with all applicable policies of the County s Comprehensive Plan. Adequate ingress/egress, infrastructure and public and private services are available to serve both parcels. Compliance with the project description and conditions of approval will ensure that the subdivision does not create any significant environmental impacts. The parcel sizes are consistent with those of the surrounding area and any future development will be required to be compatible with neighboring land uses. The project is also consistent with the requirements of the Land Use and Development Code, and Chapter 21, the County Subdivision Ordinance.

Acquistapace Tentative Parcel Map / Case No. 15TPM-00000-00005/TPM 14,817 Hearing Date: August 17, 2015 Attachment A: Findings Page # 2 2.3 State Government Code 66474. The following findings shall be cause for disapproval of a Tentative Parcel Map: a. The proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in 66451. The project is consistent with all applicable policies of the County Comprehensive Plan, as described in Section 5.0 of the Zoning Administrator staff report dated November 20, 2015. b. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. Compliance with the project description and conditions of approval will ensure that the proposed Tentative Parcel Map is consistent with all applicable policies of the County s Comprehensive Plan, the Santa Barbara County Land Use and Development Code, and Chapter 21, the County Subdivision Ordinance. c. The site is not physically suitable for the type of development proposed. Adherence to the project description and conditions of approval will ensure that both parcels are sufficient in size for existing and future development of the lots. Future development will have adequate access and public services and will be compatible with the adjacent agricultural and commercial uses. Therefore, the site is physically suitable for development as shown on the project plans. d. The site is not physically suited for the proposed density of development. The subdivided parcels will meet the minimum lot size required by the AG-II-40 and C-S zone districts, and each parcel is adequate in size and shape to accommodate future development while minimizing environmental impacts. With implementation of the conditions of approval outlined in Attachment B of the Zoning Administrator staff report dated November 20, 2015 (incorporated herein by reference), potential impacts will be minimized. Adequate public and private services will be available to serve the project. As such, the site can be found physically suitable for the proposed density of development. e. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. There are no known sensitive plant or animal species located on the subject parcel.

Acquistapace Tentative Parcel Map / Case No. 15TPM-00000-00005/TPM 14,817 Hearing Date: August 17, 2015 Attachment A: Findings Page # 3 f. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems. There are no identified or likely public health problems or hazards associated with the lot split from future development of the two lots. Adequate water, utilities, and access are available to serve the parcels. The project is not located within an area of historic flood hazards and has been reviewed and approved by the County Fire Department, the County s Flood Control District, Environmental Health Services, and Air Pollution Control District. g. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. The tentative parcel map will not conflict with any easements located on the property. The proposed driveways have been located outside of any public easements on the property that are used for utilities or access. No easements will need to be altered or relocated as a result of the project. Therefore, the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the subdivision. 2.4 State Government Code 66474.4. The legislative body of a city or county shall deny approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map for which a tentative map was not required, if it finds that either the resulting parcels following a subdivision of that land would be too small to sustain their agricultural use or the subdivision will result in residential development not incidental to the commercial agricultural use of the land, and if the legislative body finds that the land is subject to any of the following: a. A contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 51200) of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5), including an easement entered into pursuant to Section 51256. The project site is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965 (Chapter 7 (commencing with Section 51200) of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5), including an easement entered into pursuant to Section 51256. b. An open-space easement entered into pursuant to the Open-Space Easement Act of 1974 (Chapter 6.6 (commencing with Section 51070) of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5). The project site is not subject to an open-space easement entered into pursuant to the Open-Space Easement Act of 1974 (Chapter 6.6 (commencing with Section 51070) of Part 1 of Division 1 of Title 5).

Acquistapace Tentative Parcel Map / Case No. 15TPM-00000-00005/TPM 14,817 Hearing Date: August 17, 2015 Attachment A: Findings Page # 4 c. An agricultural conservation easement entered into pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 10260) of Division 10.2 of the Public Resources Code. The project site is not subject to an agricultural conservation easement entered into pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 10260) of Division 10.2 of the Public Resources Code. d. A conservation easement entered into pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 815) of Part 2 of Division 2 of the Civil Code. The project site is not subject to a conservation easement entered into pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 815) of Part 2 of Division 2 of the Civil Code. 2.5 State Government Code 66474.6. The governing body of any local agency shall determine whether discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into an existing community sewer system would result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by a California Regional Water Quality Control Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with 13000) of the Water Code. Waste discharge for parcel 1 will continue to be provided by the City of Santa Maria. Waste discharge for parcel 2 will be provided by a private septic system built in conformance with Environmental Health Services requirements. The County s Environmental Health Services department has reviewed the project and has determined that the lot created by this lot split will not be in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board for the discharge of waste water. EHS has determined that a private septic disposal system will be feasible and adequate to serve domestic wastewater based on soil conditions and the size of the parcels. Future development will be subject to policies and plans in effect at the time such development is proposed. 3.0 TENTATIVE MAP FINDINGS A. The following, among others, shall be cause for disapproval of a tentative map including tentative parcel maps, but the tentative map may nevertheless be approved in spite of the existence of such conditions where circumstances warrant: 3.1 Easements or rights-of-way along or across proposed county streets which are not expressly subordinated to street widening, realignment, or change of grade by an instrument in writing recorded, or capable of being recorded, in the Office of the County Recorder, provided, however, that the Director of Public Works may approve such easements or rights-of-way without such subordinations. Easements or rights-of-way shall not be granted along or across proposed county streets before filing for record of the final subdivision map by the County Recorder, unless the Director of Public Works shall approve such grants. If the Director of Public Works does not grant such approvals within fourteen days from the date they were requested, they shall be deemed to have been refused. Appeal from refusal of the Director of Public Works to grant such approvals may be made in writing to the Board of Supervisors, which may overrule the Director of Public Works and grant such requested approvals in whole or in part.